PressReleasePing

Unanimity on Condemnations of Free

Speech Dogma, SAARC-ASEAN Postdoc
Academics 1st Mark Inter-Faith Peace
Observance, Consensus to Curb Religious
Blasphemies
"Does the 'free speech' notion hold an absolute value anywhere?? Even in the western
culture?? Can 'freedom of expression' be meant for; over-riding the humane and ethical
deeds?sabotaging the entire ethico-moral codes?bulldozing the whole cross-communal or
inter-ethnic human values system..?"??? An Analytical Discourse and Scholarly Treatise of
Free Speech Dogmatization: Logical Fallacies and Ethico-Moral Shortfalls Exposed by
SAARC-ASEAN Postdoctoral Academics
Colombo, Sri Lanka, Asia, January 09, 2016 /PressReleasePing/ - While remembering
the again-n-again cyclical recurrences of the blasphemous acts by Charlie Hebdo, a myriad of
thorny questions besieges every logical mind which of the stimuli can be able to justify this
venomous absurdity? what objective can be achieved by insulting and disparaging ones
objects of sacredness? what purpose can be served by manifesting such offensive profanes
and blasphemies? except breaching, contravening and infringing the inter-faith peace and a
state of cross ethnic harmony? remind Post-doctoral academics and other scholars of
ASEAN and SAARC regions.

We have to strive for a principal resolve for these highly condemnable cyclical blasphemous
reappearances that become responsible for rupturing and breaching the cross-ethnic state of
harmony and inter-faith peace environment.

And if, we fail, therefore, to respond at this highly susceptible and subject-to-viciousness
point, or if the global community continues to shy away from taking a moral stand, then, there
can be no more justifiable reason for the pursuit of a global peace in a broader perspectives of
cross-ethnic, cross-sectarian and inter-faith outlook, at the least realms of peace
reconciliations!

This is not an offensive delinquency against a religious group, but the exasperations and

dreadfully obnoxious manifestations of immorality, against all religions and the whole global
creeds said Postdoctoral academics belonging to dissimilar and unalike articles of faith.

Higher judiciary-officials of Asian region strappingly condemned blasphemous acts and

declared them grave inter-faith violence by all means, at all vantages and from all
perspectives, in a pronounced way by citing decidedly significant reference quote-marks from
diverse scriptures.

The Dogma-notion of Free Speech:

'Freedom of Speech' is the narrative that is vastly and quite pretentiously used by certain
quarters, to not only validate, but justify and vindicate the sacrileges, profanities and religious
blasphemies.

The notion of an 'absolute free speech' serves as a pretext as well as the basic 'construct of
interpretation' for the motives ahead of certain sentiments-injuring acts and the nefarious
designs behind igniting the hatred inflaming.

Todays' radical debate, as well as a serious communal-issue of the moment is, "... Mr. ABC
holds an 'absolute right' to free speech", or "...No compromises can be made on Mr. XYZ's
'freedom of expression'.." etc. These narratives are being narrated and re-narrated by many
people so senselessly and inconsiderately, that it appears as if one has never paused for a
moment and thought of the stark implications for what he or she is stating or endorsing of!

Does the 'free speech' notion hold an absolute value anywhere? Even in the western
culture? Can 'freedom of expression' be meant for; over-riding the humane and ethical
deedssabotaging the entire ethico-moral codesbulldozing the whole cross-communal or
inter-ethnic human values system..? These are some thorny questions posed over to the mind
that holds some rationality, any sense of right and wrong, or at least, a more or less
conscience or some scruples of righteousness within one's self.

Exercising 'free speech', that may ardently injure or sensitively indignant a certain ethnicity, is
criminalized, in almost all western countries. Henceforth, the sacrileges and profanities
crossing all the limits of ethical or moral codes, and even in most of the cases abolishing all
humanity-based values, cannot be rationalized, by any means or on any account, to be
permissible or tolerable to mutilate, harm and detriment the inter-ethnic peace of global
communities by planting the seeds of hatred abhorrence or blasphemies.

There exists nowhere in the world where licenses are granted that one can flagrantly say and
blatantly express whatever he or she likes to; but reasonably, there are certain limits that one
is supposed to be within.

However, pretty conversely, the kind of the 'moral trait-outlook' manifested by certain vagrant
quarters, on the face of 'free speech', is neither justifiable, nor explicable on the least of any of
the moral, ethical, judicial or humanitarian accounts!

Analyzing the Dogma-notion---An Open License to Free Speech?:

Advocating for an 'open license' to the 'free speech' and spreading the dogma-notion behind
this, is nothing, but a clumsily and maladroitly 'disgraceful-enough' modality of ridiculous
manifestations by deflated societies, having no acclimatization of moral perspectives.

While advocating the tarnished-hatred, apparently, the 'tender-keepers' of free speech, along
with their biased and discriminatory partisan means, present certain devious and deceitful
arguments in wrapped misconceptions and logical-fallacies.

So thoughtlessly, not only to the extents of public spheres, but also many of the so-called
communal 'opinion-builders' are onto the 'dogma', that they aren't even aware of. More or
less, completely side-tracking or ignoring the far-reaching corollary repercussions, the
consequential upshots and the socio-moral reverberations associated therewith.

However, when it reaches to the end of the tether or the commonsense truss-leash, one can
easily comprehend and realize the rationality-based questions that arise from such naive
argumentative fallacies.

Examining the reason-index:

Now, for instance, lets examine that: are these reason-indexes actually so, as they are
dogmatized to appear or opinionated to spread out? Do these jargons and verbiages certainly
provide some justifiable grounds for a 'free speech' without any limits? With an absolute builtin value capable to bulldoze all other values..?..Especially when it comes to the sensitivities-

based sentiments?

These are not, but just some of the simplest questions out of an entire cluster of rationalitydemanding enigma-paradoxes, that are serious-enough in their nature. Not only are questions
enigmas, but, in a literal sense, these are the 'essential morality-probes' for a considerate
mind that can hold to the state of affairs, when it comes to moral convictions. Henceforth,
these 'probes' are to be dealt with great trepidations.

The Senselessness behind the Talk of the Town:

Today's talk of the town, " Charlie Hebdo or Riss has an 'absolute right' to free speech", is
being repetitively narrated everywhere as senselessly as it could be and as thoughtlessly as it
should be!

Not need to mention, Charlie Hebdo has an evident track-record for stoking up the 'flames of
racial hate' and promoting cross-ethnic rancor content and abhorrence that is progressively
proceeding towards austere hatred revulsions and animosity conflicts. It has long continued to
push hatred, revulsive and rhetoric pomposity through its satiric, magniloquence and a series
of tarnish ads.

Charlie Hebdo has got notorious escalations in promoting ethnic hate throughout the globe,
and henceforth, is labeled as a 'hate-content-promotion-group', by the academics.

Unanimity to Curb Blasphemies:

We, the academicians of ASEAN and SAARC regions, under the patronage and
benefactions of Justice(R) S.S. Paru L.L.D., Chancellor Emeritus SAARC-ASEAN Post-doc
Academia (Indonesia), Dr. Faisar N.M. (Sri Lanka), Dame Dr. Mehar Master Moos (India), Dr.
Bareera N.B. (Pakistan), Dr. Dass U. (India), Justice (R) Khawaja Muhammad Sharif, Justice
(R) Nazir Akhtar, Prof. Qadhi Aurangzeb Al-Hafi, Prof. Emeritus Dr. Zaki, Dr. Khalida M. Khan,
Dr. F. M. Bhatti and Lt. Col (R) Azhar Saleem (Pakistan), along with tens of hundreds of other
academics from SAARC-ASEAN Post-doc Academia, unanimously condemn religious
blasphemies and echo our clarion call by marking this day, to curb sacrilege, irreverence and
all types and forms of desecrations and profanities, against all of the sacred and revered
objects or entities that is beheld to any faith-article of any religion, say cross-disciplinary
scholars belonging to different faiths, at the 1st Inter-Faith Peace Observance.

SAARC Anti-blasphemy Commission presented a Deca-archic Strategic Action Plan, to

address the dilemma, and made strong recommendations to build a cross-ethnic and interfaith
sentimentalities-based consensus in the broad-based ethico-moral perspectives, concerning
the sensitivities related to the subject-matter.

The Declaration of Peace Martyrdoms:

Cherif and Said Kouachi have been titled Martyrdoms of Peace. Special memorial services
with high religious reverence have been paid in honor of the French Kouachi brothers.

The two brothers gunned down the Hebdo cursers for the reason of the repeated and cyclical
blasphemous acts that French publisher, Charlie Hebdo used to carry out repetitively since
2006.

The two assassins, who eventually turned to be murdered by the French authorities and
police consequently, have been declared as Leading Inter-Faith Peace Heroes and
Protagonist Martyrdoms, by the 1st All Universities Inter-Faith Peace Observance,
unanimously.
Leader of the World Minorities Alliance J. Salik (Ex Pakistani Federal Minister of Minorities)
supported the anti-blasphemy cause and made high condemnations on the blasphemous acts
of Charlie Hebdo, and categorically cited for the sentiments of Vaticans Pope Francis,
concerning the sensitivity of the subject-matter. Though, the Vatican Popes statement didnt
justify the Hebdo murders, but nevertheless, quite noticeably and evidently, it provided an
appreciably perceptible baseline and reference point position. The Pope very clearly stated
for what constitutes the conceivable principal base-line, concerning the subject under
considerations, learnt the cross-regional scholars at the 1st Inter-Faith Peace Observance.

The Pope very clearly stated for what constitutes the conceivable principal base-line,
concerning the subject under considerations, learnt the cross-regional scholars at the 1st
Inter-Faith Peace Observance.

Last year, the in-absentia funeral services for Cherif and Said Kouachi were solemnly paid in
Peshawar, Istanbul, Kabul Hyderabad Deccan, Sri Lanka, and Indonesia declaring Kouachi
brothers martyrdoms. French authorities forbade the family members to hold their funeral in
Paris. However, the prevented funeral began to be commenced at different parts of the
world. Initiated by Qadhi Aurangzeb Al Hafi and Allama Pir Muhammad Chishti, the memorials

to honor them have been performed in almost 12 countries.

The IFPO conveners Justice (R) S.S. Paru, Dr. Fiasar N.M. and Dr. Bareera N.B., gave the
opening and the closing discourses as well.

The IFPOs observed across the SAARC and ASEAN regions, were convened by
academicians, councils of legislatures, different seminaries and leaders of political parties.
Colombo, Sri Lanka
Dr. Faisar N. M.
SAARC Academia?s Anti-Blasphemy Action Commission
0094775993698
saarc-sec@asia.com
www.saarc-sec.org
Source URL: http://pressreleaseping.com/unanimity-condemnations-free-speech-dogma-saarc-aseanpostdoc-academics-1st-mark-inter-faith-peace