Understanding

Consumer Behavior and

Consumption Experience
Rajagopal

EGADE Business School, Tecnolgico de Monterrey, Mxico

Raquel Castao
EGADE Business School, Tecnolgico de Monterrey, Mxico

A volume in the Advances

in Marketing, Customer
Relationship Management,
and E-Services (AMCRMES)
Book Services

Chapter 1

Sensory Marketing

INTRODUCTION
Passengers boarding Boeings new 787 Dreamliner are in for a very different ride that they
may be used to when flying the world skies. As soon as they step through the cabin door,
they will realize that this is an airplane designed to please the senses. High vaulted ceilings,
adaptable LED lighting, and larger windows with electric dimming capabilities create a
visually spacious and comfortable cabin. A new air filtration system removes contaminants
and odors, letting consumers breathe clean, fresh air. A quieter air conditioning system,
sound-deadening materials in the walls and ceiling, and new engine components
significantly reduce noise and improve sound quality in the cabin. Even interior equipment
is specifically intended to reduce squeaks. Softer plastics and materials enfold passengers in
their seats. Finally, the in-flight entertainment system provides on-demand audiovisual
content to every seat.
Boeing is not alone among marketers in appealing to consumers senses to help their
products stand out in a crowded marketplace. An increasing number of managers are using
the sensory qualities of their products and retail spaces to connect their brands and products
with consumers. These efforts leverage the ability of sensations to influence moods, form
product memories, and build brand attachments in order to increase sales. Such efforts can
be described as sensory marketing, which is defined as marketing that engages the
consumers senses and affects their perception, judgment and behavior; it represents the
application of sensation and perception principles to the field of marketing (Krishna, 2012).
Over the past three decades, consumer researchers have begun to explore the roles of
sensation and perception in consumer behaviors. These two intricately related concepts
refer to different stages of sensory processing. Sensation, which is primarily a physical
process, occurs when environmental stimuli (e.g., light) reach the sensory organs (e.g.,
eyes) and stimulate the receptor cells in these organs. Perception, on the other hand, is the
understanding or interpretation of the environmental information obtained through the

Copyright2015, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited

senses. In other words, in perceiving stimuli, consumers draw from their experiences,
learning and memory to interpret the information they receive through their senses. This
distinction is important, because it suggests that consumers may not perceive marketing
stimuli exactly as they are presented in the environment.
A good way to understand this difference is to think of visual illusions, in which what
people see does not necessarily correspond to the actual features of an image or object.
Consumers have learned through experience that certain things look a certain way; thus,
when they encounter these things, they see what they have learned to expect rather what is
actually shown. Consumer perception is a complex process that is affected by the
characteristics of the individual consumer (knowledge, interests and experiences),
characteristics of the stimulus (the features of the stimulus itself), and the context (the
setting in which the stimulus is found). Sensation and perception are automatic processes
that, to a large extent, occur outside of conscious awareness. Although research suggests
that there are multiple sensory systems, this chapter will focus on the traditional
classification of the five senses touch (also known as haptics), smell, taste, hearing and
vision as they have broad applications in marketing. Research on sensation and
perception contains important insights for marketing managers. Because complete product
information is desirable but seldom available before purchase and consumption, consumers
make inferences about the quality and performance of a product on the basis of sensory
cues such as appearance, shape, sound, smell, taste, and texture, as well as other product
cues perceived through the senses such as brand, price, or package. Thus, sensory cues are
important in consumer evaluations and decision making.
One important cue from which consumers derive information and make inferences
about a product is its package. Packaging not only protects the product but also conveys
important information about the product and its positioning. In fact, the package has
become an important point of differentiation for many consumer products. Firms and
consumers are increasingly interested in the sensory and aesthetic features of product
packages. This chapter will also discuss recent research on the influences packaging can
have on consumer behaviors. Some of this research has used sophisticated brain imaging
technology to explore how consumers react to the attractiveness of product packages.
It is important to note that sensory cues can influence consumer behavior through both
conscious and unconscious mechanisms. The sensory cues consumers perceive in their
environment outside of their awareness can also have effects on their minds. Unconscious
consumer processes constitute both an interesting area of recent research and an
opportunity for managers to develop marketing strategies based on consumers nonconscious perceptions of stimuli. This chapter will illustrate how insights from research on
sensory cues and unconscious processes can help managers develop effective marketing
strategies based on the five senses. The chapter will close with a set of rules for managerial
action. Overall, this chapter is intended to provide managerial guidance on the basis of
recent research findings on perception and consumption processes.
2

1. EFFECTS OF SENSORY CUES

As mentioned before, this chapter will focus on the traditional classification of the five
senses: touchalso known as hapticssmell, taste, hearing and vision.
Touch
Interest in how the touch properties of objects affect consumers has been growing in recent
years. Because the skin is the largest organ in humans, the sense of touch is very important
for consumers, who perceive a wide array of stimuli through touch. Touching not only
allows for the active manipulation of objects but also, in an interpersonal context, has also
been shown to affect attitudes and behaviors. Research on airline passengers has found that
being touched on the shoulder or forearm by a flight attendant increases passengers liking
of the flight attendant, liking of the airline in general, and feeling of safety while flying
(Wycoff & Holley, 1990).
As a form of direct experience with a product, touch has been found to play a role in
product evaluation (Peck & Childers, 2003). Consumers prefer to buy products from
vendors who allow them to touch their products, especially when touch characteristics are
important to evaluate a product through information that cannot be obtained visually
(McCabe & Nowlis, 2003). This is particularly important when touch sensations are
diagnostic of a products quality or performance (e.g., textiles and clothing). In fact,
research shows that attitude and purchase intentions are significantly more influenced by
tactile information than by visual information. For example, consumers in one experiment
expressed stronger unfavorable feelings when they were not allowed to touch the product
than when their vision of the product was blocked. Also, findings from the same study
suggest that visual cues and tactile information may interact and have additive effects on
product evaluation (Balaji, Raghavan, & Jha, 2011).
Consumer preference for touching products has become more relevant with the
increasing frequency of Internet shopping, which does not allow consumers to touch
products before purchasing them. The concept of virtual touch, refers to the sense of touch
that consumers perceive in a virtual product experience online. Providing consumers with a
simulated touching experience could have effects on consumers evaluation of and
intention to buy a product (Demirci, 2007).
Smell
The human sense of smell can identify around 10,000 different scents (Buck & Axel,
1991). Of the five senses, the sense of smell is the most closely related to emotion and
memory, because olfactory organs are structurally linked to the regions of the brain that
process emotions and memory (Herz & Engen, 1996). Thus, scent information is more
emotional, more easily remembered recalled, and stored longer in memory than information
3

from other senses (Herz, 2004). This suggests that scents can be powerful cues to help
consumers learn and remember products and experiences. In marketing, smells have been
used mainly in two ways: to create an association with a product and to create an
atmosphere or ambiance in a place.
Product scent can increase memory for product information. In one experiment,
consumers received a pencil imbued with a pine scent, a tea tree scent, or no scent, along
with a list of ten attributes of the pencil. Consumers who received the scented pencils could
recall more attributes two weeks later than consumers who received the unscented pencils
(Krishna, Lwin, & Morrin, 2010). In addition, scent is more powerful when it is congruent
with the product. For instance, consumers evaluated a suntan lotion with a coconut scent
more positively than a suntan lotion with a lemon scent, because the former was perceived
as more congruent (Bone & Jantrania, 1992).Furthermore, imagining a scent can enhance
consumers evaluations, and even influence physiological responses, such as salivating, and
actual consumption when imagining a fresh baked cookie. (Krishna, Morrin & Sayin,
2014). This effect can be significantly increased by pairing the scent with a visual image.
In contrast to product scent, ambient scent does not originate from a product; instead, it
is present in the environment of a specific location (Spangenberg, Crowley, & Henderson,
1996). Research indicates that scents can influence cognition, affective responses and even
behaviors. Studies of the effect of ambient scent have shown that scents can have a number
of positive effects. Ambient scents can improve recall and recognition of both familiar and
unfamiliar brands (Morrin & Ratneshwar, 2003). Neutral or pleasant scents can improve
consumers store and product evaluations, can make consumers feel they have spent less
time in the store (Spangenberg et al., 1996), and can influence consumers intentions to
visit and return to a store (Bone & Ellen, 1999). Under some conditions in a shopping mall
environment, pleasant scents have been found to improve shoppers perceptions of the
retail environment and, indirectly, product quality (Michon, Chebat, & Turley, 2005). A
study in a dance club found that pleasant scents (orange, seawater or peppermint) used to
mask unwanted odors enhanced dancing activity and improved evaluations of both the
music and the evening (Schifferstein, Talke, & Oudshoorn, 2011).
Scents can also increase the amount time spent on a decision task (Bone and Ellen
1999) and the amount of time spent shopping. For example, one study found that
consumers spent more time shopping, but did not buy more, in a scented store
(Spangenberg et al., 1996). Other studies have found that ambient scents may influence
purchasing behaviors. For example, gamblers in a casino spent more at slot machines when
the casinos were infused with a pleasant scent (Hirsch, 1995). Another experiment tested a
lavender scent, a lemon scent or no odor diffused in a restaurant and showed that the
lavender scent increased both the time spent and the amount purchased (Guguen & Petr,
2006).
Because consumers generally use product and environmental cues as information, the
congruency of the scent and the product or the environment in which the product is offered
seems to be important. Scents that are consistent with the product tend to produce improved
4

product evaluations, whereas scents that are incongruent tend to have a negative effect
(e.g., Bosmans, 2006). Moreover, retail stores commonly have separated areas for feminine
and masculine categories of products. Gender-based scent congruity can improve
consumers evaluations of the store in regard to selection, style, quality and prices; and the
time consumers spend at the store (Spangenberg et al., 2006).
Hearing
Sound refers to the small vibrations in the air caused by speech, music, and other noises
that are detected by the auditory system. Sound is ubiquitous in marketing communications;
it is an important dimension of brands, products, advertising and retail environments.
Sound symbolism, or the meaning we attach to sounds, is an important factor in how
consumers interpret brand names. Consumers use information from the sound of brand
names to infer product attributes and evaluate brands. For example, one study found that an
ice cream with the brand name Frosh was perceived as richer, smoother and creamier than
the same ice cream with the brand name Frish (Yorkston & Menon, 2004). Furthermore,
homophones can serve to prime behaviors in consumers. For example, when consumers
cognitive resources are busy: the word bye (homophone to buy) can lead to a higher
willingness to pay; right leads to more words written; and phew! resulted in predicting
saving less money (Davis & Herr, 2014).
The sound a product makes can also impact consumer evaluations and the benefits
consumers derive from the product. For example, the sound certain foods like carrots and
chips make when they are consumed influences consumers evaluations of their quality and
freshness (Zampini & Spence, 2005). Moreover, music that has been categorized as bitter
(or sweet) played in the background can alter the bitterness (or sweetness) of food while
being sampled (Crisinel et al., 2012).
Music used in marketing-related contexts is capable of producing affective and
behavioral responses in consumers (Gorn, Pham & Sin, 2001). Research has found that
varying musical elements (e.g., mode, tempo, pitch, rhythm, harmony, or volume) can nonconsciously alter affective states (e.g., happiness, sadness, or amusement; Bruner, 1990).
Moreover, music influences how a product is evaluated depending on the available
resources that the consumers have to process the information and their level of need for
cognition (Zhu & Meyers-Levy, 2005). For example, consumers will evaluate a travel
agency higher in the dependable and hassle-free dimensions if the ad is easy to process and
the music is sedative (vs energetic; Zhu & Meyers-Levy, 2005).
Background music in retail settings can also influence consumer perceptions and
behaviors. The mere presence of music can have a positive effect on store patronage as well
as consumers feelings of pleasure. In addition, music can influence consumers to select
certain products, particularly when it is perceived as congruent with the target product. For
example, playing French or German music has been shown to have a positive effect on
sales of French and German wines, respectively (North, Hargreaves, & McKendrick, 1999),
5

and classical music has been shown to induce customers to purchase more expensive wines
compared to Top 40 music (Areni & Kim, 1993). Music can also influence shopping and
consumption pace. Slow-tempo, low-volume, and more familiar music lead consumers to
stay longer than high-tempo, high-volume or less familiar music (Garlin & Owen, 2006).
For example, one study found that supermarket shoppers shopped longer and moved more
slowly through the store when slow-tempo music was played than when fast-tempo music
was played (Milliman, 1982). In another study, when slow-tempo background music was
played in a restaurant, customers stayed longer and consumed more alcoholic beverages
(Milliman 1986). Research has also found that consumers spend more time and more
money in a store (Herrington, 1996) or restaurant (Caldwell & Hibbert, 2002) when they
like the music that is being played. Also, when consumers enjoy the music, they feel they
have spent less time shopping (Yalch & Spangenberg, 2000) and have a more positive
emotional response to waiting (Hui, Dube, & Chebat, 1997). Music is likely to have its
greatest behavioral effect when consumers have high affective and/or low cognitive
involvement with the product (Bruner 1990).
Taste
The sense of taste provides information mainly about the food and beverages we consume.
Eating is one of lifes great pleasures for many consumers, and food holds an important
place in modern society. Flavor is the combination of taste, smell, touch, and trigeminal
(mechanical, thermal, chemical or pain; e.g., the slight irritation caused by chili) sensations,
as well as visual and auditory cues (Auvray & Spence, 2008). As a result, most research in
this area has focused on how interactions among the senses affect taste perceptions, and a
common finding is that taste perceptions are highly susceptible to other sensory cues. Taste
perceptions of a food item can be affected by its smell, texture, consistency and temperature
and the sound it makes when eaten.
Product attributes, such as color, brand name, labeling, or packaging, can also influence
the experience of taste. For example, consumers often misidentify the flavor of drinks when
the coloring is inappropriate, relying more on the color than on the taste of the drink to
identify the flavor. In one experiment, only 20% of participants correctly identified the
flavor of a drink when its color was not visible, and 26% of participants reported that a
cherry-flavored drink tasted of lemon/lime when it was colored green (DuBose, Cardello, &
Maller, 1980).
2. NON-CONSCIOUS PROCESSES IN CONSUMER BEHAVIOR
Imagine the following scenario: You are at the grocery store buying groceries for the week.
You are exposed to hundreds or even thousands of sensory stimuli, such as colors,
products, designs, brands, prices, packages, and textures. While moving through the store,
you listen to the nice background music and smell the aroma of freshly baked bread
6

emanating from the strategically situated bakery at the stores entrance. Your brains
attention mechanisms automatically filter out non-essential information, but what
information do you actually perceive? How does it affect your purchase decisions?
For many years, it was assumed that buyer decision making was a conscious and
deliberate process. New research, however, suggests that environmental and contextual
stimuli can have an important influence on behavior outside of conscious awareness.
Mental processes are considered non-conscious when individuals are not aware that their
behavior is being influenced by context or environmental stimuli.
Non-conscious processes are considered to be beyond conscious awareness or voluntary
control (Epley & Gilovich, 2001). Although prior research has made important progress in
the field of non-conscious processes of consumption (e.g., Bargh, 1990; Tom, Nelson,
Srzentic, & King, 2007; Chartrand, Huber, Shiv, & Tanner, 2008; Fitzsimons, Chartrand, &
Fitzsimons, 2008), still little is known about its implications for marketing.
Non-conscious stimuli can be presented in two ways. The first form is subliminal,
which refers to stimuli that occur outside of consumers awareness. Subliminal stimuli can
be produced by presenting a stimulus very rapidly. To be considered subliminal, a stimulus
has to be presented for less than 20 milliseconds. (By comparison, each still frame of a
traditional film is projected for 42 milliseconds.) At this speed, individuals are not able to
see the stimuli, but their subconscious is able to perceive it. Research on this topic,
however, has produced contradictory and inconclusive results on the effects of subliminal
stimuli.
Subliminal advertising has been the focus of study as early as the 1950s, when market
researcher James Vicary claimed an increase in sales of both soft drinks and popcorn after
flashing the messages Drink Coca-Cola and Eat popcorn in a movie theater. After
unsuccessful attempts to replicate these findings, it was concluded that the messages had no
effect on behavior. However, several decades later, in the early 2000s, research showed
that it is possible to modify behavior outside the individuals awareness using nonconscious primes. Although both subliminal primes (i.e. stimuli of which the individual is
not aware) and supraliminal primes (discussed below) happen on a non-conscious level,
they do not operate in the way that Vicary assumed (Karremans, Stroebe, & Claus, 2006).
The form of non-conscious stimuli is supraliminal. In this case, consumers are aware of
the stimulus but not of its potential influence on their behavior. For example, in a study
conducted by Ferraro, Bettman, and Chartrand (2009), subjects observed a series of
photographs of individuals engaged in everyday activities (e.g., waiting for a bus or having
lunch), after which they were asked to choose a brand of bottled water. Researchers found
that, when the photographs the subjects observed had images of a water bottle with its
brand visible embedded into them the subjects more frequently chose the brand they had
seen in the photographs. What is interesting about this study is that, when questioned after
completing the task, subjects could not recall having seen the chosen brand in the
photographs. In addition, a products effectiveness can be diminished if consumers paid a
reduced (vs full) price, which is a form of the placebo effect (Shiv, Carmon & Ariely,
7

2005). This effect has been found to work at a supraliminal level (i.e. the consumer is
aware of the promotional discount). However, in the field of medicine, a recent study
showed that the placebo effect can be induced subliminally (Jensen et al., 2012). This
finding opens a possible new line of research in the marketing field in order to investigate if
it can be replicated in consumer behavior.
This line of research suggests that most of our consumption decisions may be
primarily determined not by conscious intentions and deliberate choices, but by
psychological processes that are set in motion by stimuli from the environment that operate
outside of conscious awareness.
3. AESTHETIC PACKAGE DESIGN
Packaging refers to all activities related to the design and production of the container and/or
wrapper for a product. The original objective of packaging was to protect the product;
however, marketers have increasingly used the product packaging as a major factor in
gaining customers (Sehrawet and Kundu, 2007). Up to three levels of materials are used in
packaging: the primary package, secondary package, and tertiary or shipping package. The
primary package is directly in contact with the product; for example, a perfume bottle. The
secondary package serves to protect the product while identifying and communicating its
qualities and is usually discarded once the product is consumed. For example, this could be
a box containing the perfume bottle. Finally, shipping or tertiary package contains the two
previous forms and is used to distribute, unify and protect products throughout the
distribution chain. For example, this could be a cardboard box containing several boxed
bottles of perfume. This section focuses on the secondary package, which can be very
influential in persuading consumers because it is present at the crucial moment when the
purchase decision is made (Orth and Malkewitz, 2008).
Product packaging can be used to transmit and communicate brand information, to
modify brand beliefs, and even to affect consumption. Previous studies have shown that
product packaging creates desired consumer perceptions via packaging elements such as
color, typography or font, graphic form and illustrations (e.g. Ampuero & Vila, 2006). It
also communicates brand personality via multiple structural and visual elements combining
brand logos, colors, fonts, package materials, images, product descriptions, and shapes
(Underwood, 2003). Packaging has been found to be as important as price, as it is able to
change brand beliefs. Further, large product packages of familiar branded products
encourage more use than small packages, thus affecting the amount of product consumed
(Wansink, 1996).
Orth and Malkewitz (2008) found that package designs can be narrowed down to five
holistic types massive, contrasting, natural, delicate, and nondescript that are related to
brand personality. For example, massive package designs are associated with impressions
of excitement but score low in the areas of competence and sophistication, while
contrasting package design score higher on excitement, lower on competence and
8

sophistication, and average on sincerity, in addition to leading to stronger impressions of

ruggedness.
Package design, shape, and size have been shown to have non-conscious effects on
consumers. For example, research has shown that aesthetic package design significantly
increases the reaction time when choosing a product compared to standardized packages,
and that, despite higher prices, such designs are chosen over products with well-known
brands in standardized packages (Reimann et al. 2010). Attractive and attention-grabbing
package shapes are perceived as containing greater volume (Folkes & Matta, 2004), and
taller package shapes are perceived to contain more than shorter ones, apparently leading
consumers to prefer them (Raghubir & Krishna, 1999). However, when consumers have a
low self-esteem related to their body image, they will prefer smaller food packages and
consume more of them (Argo & White, 2012).
Recent research has investigated the heuristics that consumers use to estimate changes
in package sizes (Ordabayeva & Chandon, 2013). It has been found that consumers notice
differences in each dimension individually (height, width and depth) but they cannot
combine them correctly to estimate the total volume change. For example, if a container
shrinks only in one dimension, like width, consumers will easily estimate the volume
change. However, when the container has a smaller width but a larger height, consumers
will find it harder to assess the total volume change (Ordabayeva & Chandon, 2013).
Design processing theory suggests that the way a design is perceived and interpreted
encourages beliefs about product characteristics and attributes and product categorization
(Veryzer, 1999). Specifically, there is debate in the literature regarding whether or not
packaging design is a product-related attribute or a non-product-related attribute
(Underwood, 2003). Keller (1993) argued that packaging is a non-product-related attribute
that is not related to any functional, experiential or symbolic benefits or product
performance. In contrast, however, recent literature has focused on packaging as a productrelated attribute that are often critical to creating and communicating brand identity
(Underwood, 2003). Brand identity elements (logo, font, colors) can be used to confound
the consumer. However, the law can protect registered trademarks from high-similarity
copy-cats, which strive to emulate the brand leaders identity. When the brand leader is
present, these high-similarity copycats lose consumers favor because they are perceived as
lower quality brands. In contrast, moderately-similar copycats win in the presence of the
brand leader because usually they have a lower price and contain similar elements that
make consumers perceive them as members of the same product category of the brand
leader (Horen & Pieters, 2012).
Labels and Information Format
Consumers need information in order to make good decisions. Simply providing
information, however, is not sufficient; if the information provided cannot be easily
processed, consumers cannot use it appropriately. Thus, information should not only be
9

provided to consumers but should also be presented in a way that facilitates its use and
comprehension. In other words, the processability of information is a function of
information format.
Previous research has suggested that information format influences consumer
processing and choice. For instance, in a classic study, Russo (1987) showed that providing
unit price information in the form of a sorted list rather than on individual price tags
increased consumer use of unit prices. This study suggested that consumer comprehension
and decision-making are affected by information that is easy to process. Since consumer
mental processing capacity is limited, presenting information in an easily comprehensible
format can reduce the mental effort needed to process it, which in turn allows consumers to
acquire, understand, and process more of the available information. In fact, consumers tend
to process information in the form provided rather than by transforming it (Bettman &
Kakkar, 1977). Cognitive effort is a major cost of acquiring and using information, which,
for practical purposes, can be indexed by time. In other words, given an individuals
thinking capacity, time on task is a good index of the total mental effort devoted to a
given task (Russo, 1987, p. 122). In fact, fluency can affect how the information is
perceived. In a recent study, it was found that consumers evaluate better a brand which is
perceived as powerful when the brand logo is located in a high position in the package. In
contrast, consumers evaluate better a brand which is perceived as less powerful when the
logo is placed in a lower position in the package (Sundar & Noseworthy, 2014).
Information format can also influence the type of processing that occurs. Different
information formats can make some forms of processing easier.. Jarvenpaa (1989) extends
these findings to graphic formats and states that information in graphic or picture formats
may be easier to process and understand. The effectiveness of graphic over text-only
information is well-documented in education and health care research. Moreover, pictures
help consumers to organize and interpret information. In a literature review, Houts, Doak,
Doak, and Loscalzo (2006) concluded that the combination of pictures and text markedly
increased attention and recall, improved comprehension, and positively influenced
intentions and behavioral outcomes of health communications compared to text alone.
GENERAL DISCUSSION
We have reviewed the effects of perceptual and non-conscious processes on diverse
consumer behaviors. On the basis of the resulting insights, this section presented
implications for marketing, shedding more light on the practical relevance of research on
non-consciousness in consumer behavior. The research discussed in this chapter suggests
interesting ways in which marketing managers can leverage the results to develop better
marketing strategies based on scientific evidence. For example, manufacturers and retailers
may benefit from setting up their retail areas and showrooms in a manner that allows and
encourages consumers to touch and handle their products. Manufacturers and retailers who
sell their products over the Internet face particular challenges, because consumers are not
10

able to physically touch products while shopping. Some online retailers have made attempts
to compensate for touch by providing written descriptions of touch properties along with
visual elements such as pictures and videos that allow consumers to imagine what the
product feels like to the touch. Some research indicates that touch descriptions can engage
the touch sense of consumers even if they cannot actually touch the product (Balaji et al.,
2011).
As the marketplace becomes more competitive and different providers offerings
become more similar, more marketers are resorting to the sense of smell to create pleasant
environments and establish their brands. For example, American youth-oriented retailer
Abercrombie and Fitch developed a signature and instantly recognizable scent, Fierce,
which it pumps into its stores; Singapore Airlines uses a proprietary scent called Stefan
Floridian Waters in its airplanes; the lobbies at Westin hotels are scented with a white tea
fragrance developed for the chain; and Samsung reportedly increased sales at its flagship
store in New York using a summery scent of honeydew melons (Klara, 2012).
To engage consumers visual sense, managers should consider package design and
shape, since it has been demonstrated that size attracts attention and that consumers tend to
choose products in packages that appear taller than other product packages.
Finally, marketing managers must be aware of the context in which their products are
presented in the event of external and incidental exposures (non-conscious primes) that
could encourage or discourage consumers preference for their product (Martinez, Castao,
Quintanilla & Reimann, 2011).
FURTHER RESEARCH
Although there is a vast body of literature on vision and hearing, and studies on touch and
smell have recently become more frequent, the sense of taste still needs more attention. It
would be of particular interest to explore the effects of priming across two or more senses.
For example, is music more enjoyable when touching something smooth? Can different
lighting change the way food tastes and how enjoyable the music is? In terms of nonconscious processes, more research is needed on the way that external stimuli can help
consumers to achieve both consumers and marketers goals consciously or even nonconsciously. Regarding aesthetic packaging, further research could study the
neurophysiological effects of different packaging in order to better understand the elements
that constitute an aesthetic package on different product categories and how it affects
choice. Furthermore, another line of research could continue studying how to improve
labeling in order to convey important information to consumers.

11

References
Ampuero, O., & Vila, N. (2006). Consumer perceptions of product packaging. Journal of
Consumer Marketing, 23(2), 102- 114.
Areni, C.S., & Kim, D. (1993). The influence of background music on shopping behavior:
Classical versus top-forty music in a wine store. Advances in Consumer Research,
20(1), 336-340.
Argo, J. J., & White, K. (2012). When do consumers eat more? The role of appearance selfesteem and food packaging cues. Journal of Marketing, 76(2), 67-80.
Auvray, M., & Spence, C. (2008). The multisensory perception of flavor. Consciousness
and Cognition, 17(3), 1016-1031.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Dholakia, U. M. (2006). Antecedents and purchase consequences of
customer participation in small group brand communities. International Journal of
Research in Marketing, 23(1), 45-61.
Balaji, M.S., Raghavan, S., & Jha, S. (2011) Role of tactile and visual inputs in product
evaluation: A multisensory perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and
Logistics, 23(4), 513-530.
Bargh, J. A. (1990). Auto-motives: Preconscious determinants of social interaction. In E.T.
Higgins & R.M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of Motivation and Cognition Vol.2, 93130.
Bettman, J. R., & Kakkar, P. (1977). Effects of information presentation format on
consumer information acquisition strategies. Journal of Consumer Research, 3(4),
233-240.
Bettman, J. R., Luce, M. F., & Payne, J. W. (1998). Constructive consumer choice
processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(3), 187-217.
12

Bone, P. F. & Ellen, P. M. (1999). Scents in the Marketplace: Explaining a Fraction of

Olfaction. Journal of Retailing,75(1), 243-62.
Bone, P. F., & Jantrania, S. (1992). Olfaction as a cue for product quality. Marketing
Letters, 3(3), 289-296.
Bosmans, A. (2006). Scents and sensibility: when do (in) congruent ambient scents
influence product evaluations? Journal of Marketing, 70(3), 32-43.
Bruner, G.C. (1990). Music, mood, and marketing. The Journal of Marketing, 54 (4), 94104.
Buck, L., & Axel, R. (1991). A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: A
molecular basis for odor recognition. Cell, 65(1), 175-187.
Caldwell, C., & Hibbert, S.A. (2002). The influence of music tempo and musical preference
on restaurant patrons behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 19(11), 895-917
Chartrand, T. L., Huber, J., Shiv, B., & Tanner, R. J. (2008). Nonconscious goals and
consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(2), 189-201.
Crisinel, A. S., Cosser, S., King, S., Jones, R., Petrie, J., & Spence, C. (2012). A bittersweet
symphony: systematically modulating the taste of food by changing the sonic
properties of the soundtrack playing in the background. Food Quality and Preference,
24(1), 201-204.
Custers, R., & Aarts, H. (2005). Positive affect as implicit motivator: On the nonconscious
operation of behavioral goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(2),
129.
Davis, D. F., & Herr, P. M. (2014). From Bye to Buy: Homophones as a Phonological
Route to Priming. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6), 1063-1077.

13

Demirci, S. (2007). Virtual touch: An experimental study on the effects of online sense of
touch on consumer behavior. Maastricht University.
DuBose, C. N., Cardello, A. V., & Maller, O. (1980). Effects of colorants and flavorants on
identification, perceived flavor intensity, and hedonic quality of fruitflavored
beverages and cake. Journal of Food Science, 45(5), 1393-1399.
Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C. Y., & Hong, Y. Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in
judgments and reactions: A word from two perspectives. Psychological inquiry, 6(4),
267-285.
Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2001). Putting adjustment back in the anchoring and adjustment
heuristic: Differential processing of self-generated and experimenter-provided
anchors. Psychological Science, 12(5), 391-396.
Ferraro, R., Bettman, J. R., & Chartrand, T. L. (2009). The power of strangers: The effect
of incidental consumer brand encounters on brand choice. Journal of Consumer
Research, 35(5), 729-741.
Fishbach, A., Friedman, R. S., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2003). Leading us not into temptation:
Momentary allurements elicit overriding goal activation. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 84(2), 296.
Fitzsimons, G. M., Chartrand, T. L., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2008). Automatic effects of brand
exposure on motivated behavior: How Apple makes you think different. Journal of
Consumer Research, 35(1), 21-35.
Folkes, V., & Matta, S. (2004). The effect of package shape on consumers judgments of
product volume: Attention as a mental contaminant. Journal of Consumer
Research, 31(2), 390-401.

14

Frster, J., Liberman, N., & Friedman, R. S. (2007). Seven principles of goal activation: A
systematic approach to distinguishing goal priming from priming of non-goal
constructs. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(3), 211-233.
Garlin, F. V., & Owen, K. (2006). Setting the tone with the tune: A meta-analytic review of
the effects of background music in retail settings. Journal of Business
Research, 59(6), 755-764.
Gorn, G., Pham, M. T., & Sin, L. Y. (2001). When arousal influences ad evaluation and
valence does not (and vice versa). Journal of Consumer Psychology,11(1), 43-55.
Guguen, N., & Petr, C. (2006). Odors and consumer behavior in a restaurant. International
Journal of Hospitality Management, 25(2), 335-339.
Herrington, J. D. (1996). Effects of music in service environments: A
field study. Journal of Services Marketing, 10(2), 26-41.
Herz, R.S., (2004). A naturalistic analysis of autobiographical memories triggered by
olfactory, visual and auditory stimuli. Chemical Senses, 29, 217-224.
Herz, R.S., & Engen, T. (1996). Odor memory: Review and analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin
& Review, 3(2), 300313.
Hirsch, A. R. (1995). Effects of ambient odors on slotmachine usage in Las Vegas
casino. Psychology & Marketing, 12(7), 585-594.
Horen, F. V., & Pieters, R. (2012). When high-similarity copycats lose and moderatesimilarity copycats gain: the impact of comparative evaluation. Journal of Marketing
Research, 49(1), 83-91.
Houts, P. S., Doak, C. C., Doak, L. G., & Loscalzo, M. J. (2006). The role of pictures in
improving health communication: A review of research on attention, comprehension,
recall, and adherence. Patient Education and Counseling, 61(2), 173-190.
15

Hui, M.K., Dube, L., & Chebat, J.C. (1997). The impact of music on consumers reactions
to waiting for services. Journal of Retailing, 73(1), 87-104.
Jarvenpaa, S. L. (1989). The effect of task demands and graphical format on information
processing strategies. Management Science, 35(3), 285-303.
Jensen, K. B., Kaptchuk, T. J., Kirsch, I., Raicek, J., Lindstrom, K. M., Berna, C., ... &
Kong, J. (2012). Nonconscious activation of placebo and nocebo pain responses.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(39), 15959-15964.
Karremans, J., Stroebe, W & Claus, J. (2006). Beyond Vicarys fantasies: The impact of
subliminal priming and brand choice, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 42
(6), 792798.
Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand
equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1-22.
Kivetz, R., Urminsky, O., & Zheng, Y. (2006). The goal-gradient hypothesis resurrected:
Purchase acceleration, illusionary goal progress, and customer retention. Journal of
Marketing Research, 39-58.
Klara, R. (2012). Something in the air in a growing trend, retailers are perfuming stores
with near-subliminal scents. Call it branding's final frontier. Adweek. Recovered
from: http://www.adweek.com/news/advertising-branding/something-air-138683
Krishna, A. (2012). An integrative review of sensory marketing: Engaging the senses to
affect perception, judgment and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3),
332-351.
Krishna, A., Lwin, M. & Morrin, M. (2010). Product scent and memory. Journal of
Consumer Research, 37(1), 57-67.

16

Krishna, A., Morrin, M., & Sayin, E. (2014). Smellizing Cookies and Salivating: A Focus
on Olfactory Imagery. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(1), 18-34.
Martinez, I., Castao, R., Quintanilla, C., & Reimann, M. (2011). Nonconscious processes
in consumer behavior. In S. S. Posovac (Ed.), Cracking the Code: Leveraging
Consumer Psychology to Drive Profitability. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.
McCabe, D. B., & Nowlis, S. M. (2003). The effect of examining actual products or
product descriptions on consumer preference. Journal of Consumer Psychology,
13(4), 431-39.
Michon, R., Chebat, J. C., & Turley, L. W. (2005). Mall atmospherics: The interaction
effects of the mall environment on shopping behavior. Journal of Business
Research, 58(5), 576-583.
Milliman, R.E. (1982). Using background music to affect the behavior of supermarket
shoppers. The Journal of Marketing, 46(3), 86-91.
Milliman, R.E. (1986). The influence of background music on the behavior of restaurant
patrons. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(2), 286-90.
Monahan, J., Murphy, S., & Zajonc, R.B. (2000). Subliminal mere exposure: Specific,
general, and diffuse effects. Psychological Science, 11(6), 462-466.
Morrin, M., & Ratneshwar, S. (2003). Does it make sense to use scents to enhance brand
memory? Journal of Marketing Research, 40(1), 10-25.
North, A.C., Hargreaves, D.J., & McKendrick, J. (1999). Music and on-hold waiting time.
British Journal of Psychology, 90(1), 161-164
Ordabayeva, N., & Chandon, P. (2013). Predicting and managing consumers' package size
impressions. Journal of Marketing, 77(5), 123-137.

17

Orth, U. R., & Malkewitz, K. (2008). Holistic package design and consumer brand
impressions. Journal of Marketing, 72(3), 64-81.
Park, J. K., & John, D. R. (2010). Got to get you into my life: do brand personalities rub off
on consumers? Journal of Consumer Research, 37(4), 655-669.
Peck, J., & Childers, T. L. (2003). Individual differences in haptic information processing:
The 'need for touch' scale. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), 430-442.
Raghubir, P., & Krishna, A. (1999). Vital dimensions in volume perception: Can the eye
fool the stomach? Journal of Marketing Research, 96(3) 313-326.
Reimann, M., J. Zaichkowsky, C. Neuhaus, T. Bender, and B. Weber. (2010). Aesthetic
package design: A behavioral, neural, and psychological investigation. Journal of
Consumer Psychology, 20 (4), 431-41.
Russo, J. E. (1987). Toward intelligent product information systems for consumers. Journal
of Consumer Policy, 10(2), 109-138.
Schifferstein, H. N., Talke, K. S., & Oudshoorn, D. J. (2011). Can ambient scent enhance
the nightlife experience? Chemosensory Perception, 4(1-2), 55-64.
Sehrawet, M., & Kundu, S. C. (2007). Buying behaviour of rural and urban consumers in
India: The impact of packaging. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(6),
630-638.
Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information
processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general
theory. Psychological Review, 84(2), 127.
Shiv, B., Carmon, Z., & Ariely, D. (2005). Placebo effects of marketing actions:
Consumers may get what they pay for. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(4), 383393.
18

Spangenberg, E., Crowley, A. & Henderson, P. (1996). Improving the store environment:
Do olfactory cues affect evaluations and behaviors? The Journal of Marketing, 60(2),
67-80.
Sundar, A. & Noseworthy, T. J. (2014) Place the Logo High or Low? Using Conceptual
Metaphors of Power in Packaging Design. Journal of Marketing. Advance online
publication. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jm.13.0253
Tom, G., Nelson, C., Srzentic, T., & King, R. (2007). Mere exposure and the endowment
effect on consumer decision making. The Journal of Psychology, 141(2), 117125.
Underwood, R. L. (2003). The communicative power of product packaging: Creating brand
identity via lived and mediated experience. Journal of Marketing Theory and
Practice, 11(1), 62-76.
Veryzer, R. W. (1999). A nonconscious processing explanation of consumer response to
product design. Psychology and Marketing, 16(6), 497-522.
Yalch, R.F., & Spangenberg, E.R. (2000). The effects of music in a retail setting on real
and perceived shopping times. Journal of Business Research, 49(2), 139-147
Yorkston, E., & Menon, G. (2004). A sound idea: Phonetic effects of brand names on
consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 43-51.
Wansink, B. (1996). Can package size accelerate usage volume? Journal of Marketing,
60(3), 1-14.
Wycoff, E. & Holley, J. (1990) Effects of flight attendants touch upon airline passengers
perceptions of the attendant and the airline. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71(3), 32934.
Zajonc, R. B. (1968). The attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 9(2), 1-27.
19

Zaltman, G. (2000). Consumer researchers: Take a hike! Journal of Consumer

Research, 26(4), 423-428.
Zampini, M., & Spence, C. (2005). Modifying the multisensory perception of a carbonated
beverage using auditory cues. Food Quality and Preference, 16(7), 632-641.
Zhu, R., & Meyers-Levy, J. (2005). Distinguishing between the meanings of music: When
background music affects product perceptions. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(3),
333-345.

20