Democratic National Conference also sought the release of Sheikh Abdullah
who, ironically enough, would most likely have opposed their Constitutional demands. At once, the Praja Socialist Party, a secular formation, gathered stren gth in Jammu and called for a dialogue with Sheikh Abdullah. Bakshi bitterly attacke d both organizations, and at times used what one observer described as totalitarian methods to contain them.78 In January 1958, with Bakshi firmly ensconced in office and Jammu and Kashmir s constitutional relationship with India on relatively firm ground, Sheikh Abdullah was released from jail. Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru s abiding friendship with his old political colleague may have been one major factor in bringing about the release; so too may have been the desire to ensure the reincorporation of Abdullah in mainstream Jammu and Kashmir politics. Behera has suggested, following Puri, that the release (and, indeed, the fact that Mirza Afzal Beg was released from jail and allowed to mobilize a pro-Abdullah campaign) was something of a conspiratorial performance, intended to undermine the Democratic National Conference Praja Socialist Party mobilization. After achieving that objective , she has suggested, they could be quietly incarcerated in the name of safeguarding India s national interests in Kashmir .79 Though this school of thought has considerable currency in Jammu and Kashmir, it does appear somewhat simplistic. Sheikh Abdullah was after all only released after the 1957 elections, not before them, when he would have most hurt the Democratic National Conference s prospects. It is also worth noting that a third conspiratorial explanation exists for Abdullah s release, inferred from a statement by the then chief of the Intelligence Bureau, B.N. Mullik, India s first spymaster: we were sure that he would indulge in such activities as would enable us to get further direct evidence against him .80 In other words, Abdullah was released in order to secure the evidence to arrest him yet again. Whatever the truth, Mullik s observation points to the near-predestination of what was to follow. Struggling for political space, Sheikh Abdullah was in no position to seek accommodation with New Delhi. Out of jail after four years, he did nothing to alleviate Nehru s concerns. In a statement to the press, Sheikh Abdullah proclaimed that the expression of the will of the people through a plebiscite is the one formula which has been agreed upon by the parties concerned and in a mass of disagreement about details, this common denominator has held the field so far. Lest someone should have read this to mean that the field might shift in the future, Sheikh Abdullah underlined his position. Bakshi could shout from the top of the Banihal pass that the accession of Jammu and Kashmir was final and irrevocable , but such claims had no legitimacy for the government was made up of goondas [thugs], opportunists and thieves .81 33