WHAT BAD OR WRONG WITH IT?!

After a deep, long, sensative thinking and linguistic experiments of books and i
nterviews with the experts on languages that I have mentioned four points in my
writings:
a. languages alphabets of exercise are insufficient to meet the streat talking
and some very personal conversations / interviews.
b. This is a serious and hot need of this age that linguistic experts must do
their
best to invent and create some more alphabet sounds.
c. Crunt alphabets of the languages have more than one sound in speaking or wri
ting
but they are not in record.
d. Languages experts should get sounds from nature, streat talks or children ta
lks.
They can easily convert these sounds into symbles for alphabet.
These points are connected. Someone took them serious, but their attempts turtl
e are not sufficient to meet the needs of this age. With the passage of time due
circumtences different lifestyles and preferences have been totally changed. In
every moment of life challenges encountered strange horrible and hard events. T
hese are stand before men as a policy and not qualified engineer. Geting to regi
ster for these events available alphabets are not enough. Poets and writers even
ts paining people face a very uncomfortable. They cover and to over come this de
ficiency through the sounds made compounds. But this attitude is incorrect and s
o low standered by all means. These compounds always create complications in pro
nonciation.
For example, sheen sound is very commen in the world languages. In eastren, spe
cially sub-continent languages have this sound almost like a part of the sound a
lphabet. But languages of the west have not this sound like the sound of alphabe
t. They use more than six compounds for this sound:
1- Ch cliche nietzoche, Fitche, charade, chauvanism
2 - CE croce
3 CI facial precious
4 - Sh shift, sheet, shirt, shawal, shrink
5 - Si asia, malaysia
6 - Ti action, mention essential potential residentional, confidention
al
These compounds are also other sounds shine. Reader feel difficulty to pronounce
these sounds to made up. What bad or wrong in addtion of a sound on regular bas
es in alphabet of the world's languages instead of using many many different typ
es of compounds. S is available in the alphabets of the westeren languages. Afte
r S shes sound can be adapted. It can be demonstrated by a second s under line o
r a line could be put on it. It can be read shes. Do see this added sound in Eng
lish alphabet:
a ay an apple ay
b bi book
C ce cat
d de dog
e ee egg
f eff fan
g ge/gi girl
h eh hen
i ae inkwell
j jay jug
k kay kite
l el lemon
m em mango
n en nothing
o oo orange
p pe/pi pen
q ku
r ar rail
s es sachool
s shes sirt, screening, seet, sawal, srink, koros, nietzose, Crose,
Fasal,
presous, consous, asa, Malaysa, Menson, essensal, potensal
,
t te/ti tree
u yo umblrella
V vi van
w dablu whistle, west
x ex xrays
y wae year
z zee zoo
Certainly first time s (shes) will be appeared as a stranger, but when it become
s part of the alphabet sound, people will not feel strange to write or read it.