Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
by
Gita Rianawati
1004290921
ENGLISH DEPARTMENT
TEACHERS TRAINING AND EDUCATION FACULTY
PEKALONGAN UNIVERSITY
2014
APPROVAL
This final project entitled "THE EFFECTMNESS OF STUDENT TEAMSACHIEVEMENT DIVISION (STAD) METHOD IN TEACHING
DESCRIPTM READING COMPREHENSION" (An Experimental Research
at the Eighth Graders of SMP N 1 Tirto in the Academic Year of 20fi/2A14),by:
Name
GitaRianawati
NPM
100429092r
Department : English
Faculty
has been approved by the advisors of English Deparknent Teachers' Training and
Education Faculty of Pekalongan University,
Day
: Monday
Date
: July 2l*,2014
Advisor
Advisor
p{'ry,
II
aTtu*!"-
NPP. 111010214
NPP. r 11008177
NPP. lt}4l1?'20
l1
RATIFICATION
August 7il,2014. This 'Final Project' has fulfilled the requirements for the
Degree of Strata 1 (Sl) at the English Departnent.
Pekalongan, August 7n, 201 4
NPP.110411220
198103 1002
EXAMINERS
Examiner
Examiner
II
!,ilfV"
NPP. 111010218
NPP.1tt0102t4
Examiner
III
4,pr4",
Pradnva Permanasari. M.Pd
NPP.111008177
lll
STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP
The Undersign;
Name
: Gita Rianawati
NPM
:1004294921
Department :English
Faculty
However, it has been signed by the advisors and the examiners, the validation
this final project is my responsibility.
Pekalongan, July
Gita Rianawati
iv
2f
of
2014
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Bismillahirrohmanirrokhim
First and foremost, I would like to praise and thank to Allah Subhanahu
Wa taala the almighty for the blessing and inspiration leading to the completion
of my final project entitled The Effectiveness of Student Teams-Achievement
Division Method in Teaching Descriptive Reading Comprehension (An
Experimental Research at the Eighth Graders of SMP N 1 Tirto in the Academic
Year of 2013/2014. Peace and blessing on the Messenger of Allah, Muhammad
Shallalahu Alaihi Wassalam the prophet.
I also express for my special gratitude and appreciation to:
1. H. Suryani, S.H., M.Hum, as the Rector of Pekalongan Unversity.
2. Drs. H. M. Chamdi Rochmat, M.M. M.Pd, as the Dean of Teachers
giving support, guidance, advice and correction to finish this final project.
6. Saefudin, S.Pd, as the headmaster of SMP N 1 Tirto and Amin
9. My special
in finishing my final
project.
10. Last
but least,
Finally, I realize that my final project is still far from being perfect. I have
,W,
The Writer
v1
vii
ABSTRACT
Rianawati, Gita. 1004290921. 2014. The Effectiveness of Student TeamsAchievement Division (STAD) Method in Teaching Descriptive
Reading Comprehension (An Experimental Research at the
Eighth Graders of SMP N 1 Tirto in the Academic Year of
2013/2014). Final Project. Advisors: I. Sarlita D. Matra, M.Pd., II.
Pradnya Permnasari, M.Pd. English Department Teachers Training
and Education Faculty Pekalongan University.
Keywords: Student Teams-Achievement Division, Teaching Method, English
Teaching, Descriptive Text, Reading Comprehension.
This study is an Experimental Research. The objectives of this study are to
find out the effectiveness of Student Teams-Achievement Division method to
teach Descriptive reading comprehension and to describe the application of
Student Teams-Achievement Division method in teaching Descriptive reading
comprehension.
The population of this study was the eighth grade students of SMP N 1
Tirto in the academic year of 2013/2014. There were 239 students of SMP N 1
Tirto and the writer used cluster random sampling to select sample. The writer
took two classes as samples, they were 33 students of class VIII F as the
experimental group who were taught using STAD method and 33 students of class
VIII A as the control group who were taught without using STAD method.
The result of this research shows that the experimental group got better
development in the average scores than the control group. The experimental group
got better development, the average increased 18.82 point (from 62.21 to 81.03),
whereas the control group only increased 8.45 point (from 64.42 to 72.87). The
result shows that there was significance difference in the students reading
comprehension taught using STAD method in experimental group and without
STAD method in control group and it indicate that STAD was an effective
method in teaching Descriptive reading comprehension to the second grade
students of Junior High school in Tirto.
Finally, the writer suggests to apply STAD method in teaching Descriptive
reading comprehension because it had been proven scientifically that STAD
method can improve the students ability in reading comprehension of Descriptive
text.
viii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
TITLE .........
APPROVAL............
ii
RATIFICATION ....
iii
iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .....
vii
ABSTRACT ...
viii
TABLE OF CONTENTS....
ix
LIST OF TABLE....
xii
LIST OF APPENDICES.....
xiii
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the Study...
10
11
14
16
2.5 Genre.
17
18
School.......
ix
21
21
22
Text...
2.6.3 The Example of Descriptive Text..
24
25
26
27
28
29
32
32
(STAD).........
2.8.2 Components of Student Teams-Achievement Division (STAD)...
33
39
40
41
2.11Theoritical Framework.
42
43
44
44
3.3.1 Population..
45
3.3.2 Sample........
45
46
48
50
52
52
54
54
55
56
57
59
59
66
68
70
72
75
77
77
78
80
5.1 Conclusions ..
80
5.2 Suggestions ..
81
REFERENCES .
82
APPENDICES ..
85
xi
LIST OF TABLES
Table
2.1 Improvement Point . 38
2.2 Level of Awards ....
38
48
58
66
68
73
xii
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendices
1. Certificate of the Research Authorization ..
Page
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
99
104
114
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
132
141
146
148
149
151
152
xiii
153
156
161
162
32. Documentation .
163
169
xiv
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
This chapter discusses the background of the study, reasons for choosing the
topic, statements of the problem, objectives of the study, limitation of the study,
significances of the study, definition of the key terms, and outline of the study.
1.1 Background of the Study
English is an international language used in many countries all over the
world. It is used to communicate each other and it is used in many sectors
such as education, information, business, etc, so it is important to be taught
especially for the countries that English is not their first language.
Consequently, in Indonesia now English is taught in schools, from junior high
school up to university level. According to Minister of education and culture
decree No: 372/2003, English becomes the first language and the compulsory
subject that should be thought in Indonesia from junior high school up to
university level. In order to be good in mastering English, students should
master the four language skills; listening, speaking, reading and writing.
Reading is one of the language skills, which is very essential and
important for success in educational context. According to Linse (2006:69),
reading is a set of skills that involves making sense and deriving meaning
from the printed word. On the other side, Grabe & Fredericka (2003:9) as
cited by Untung (2013:36) define that reading is the ability to draw meaning
from the printed page and interpret this information appropriately. Through
reading the students can increase their knowledge and get more information
from printed material.
Practically, many students can pronounce words fluently but when being
asked what they read, they cannot respond. For students it is not easy to read
materials in a foreign language because they have to face vocabularies and
difference structures from their own language. The students also feel difficult
to comprehend the text because they still translate word by word not grasp the
meaning of the text and the other side is the use of conventional method by the
teacher that makes them get bored and not interested in learning. The teacher
asks their students to read personally, and then ask to answer the questions
from the text.
Based on the School Based Curriculum (KTSP) on Badan Standar
Nasional Pendidikan (BNSP) for junior high school several types of monolog
text are taught; Descriptive, Narrative, Procedure, Recount, Report, and etc.
Hence, the students should have reading skill and able to comprehend kinds of
those text. In the second year of junior high school, basic competence that
should be achieved in the reading English subject is that the students have
ability to response the meaning of monolog text in the form of Descriptive,
Recount, and Narrative.
In this study, the writer focused on teaching Descriptive reading
comprehension. Descriptive text is one of the functional texts which is
difficult enough to be learnt by the students. Descriptive text is a part of
factual genres. Its social function is to describe a particular person, place or
that
introduces
the
continuity and
and demand
c. Pedagogically
1) The writer hopes that this research could be references of teaching
reading comprehension of Descriptive text using Students TeamsAchievement Division method.
2) The writer hopes that this research could enrich the varieties of
educational
literature
on teaching reading
comprehension
of
d. Reading
According to Linse (2006:69), reading is a set of skills that involves
making sense and deriving meaning from the printed word.
e. Reading Comprehension
Reading
comprehension
refers
to
reading
for
meaning,
of the study, significances of the study, the limitation of the study, definition
of the key terms, and outline of the study.
Chapter II discusses previous studies, general concept of reading, reading
comprehension, the assessment of reading skill, genre, types on genre taught
to the second grade of Junior High School, Descriptive text, cooperative
learning, Student Teams-Achievement Division, the characteristics of Junior
High school students, hypothesis of the study, and theoretical framework.
Chapter III presents research methodology that discusses research design,
location of the study, subject of the research, procedures of the study, methods
of collecting data, instruments of the study, variable of the study, validity of
the test, reliability of the test, methods of analyzing data, and scoring rubric.
Chapter IV discusses the result and discussion. The result consists of the
result of tryout, the result of mean and deviation of experimental group, the
result of mean and deviation of control group, the result of t-test, the result of
observation and the result of interview. Whereas, discussion consists of the
effectiveness of Student Teams-Achievement Division method in teaching
Descriptive reading comprehension and the application of Student TeamsAchievement
Division
method
in
teaching
comprehension.
Chapter V presents the conclusions and discussions.
Descriptive
reading
CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
This chapter discusses some previous studies, general concept of reading,
reading comprehension, the assessment of reading skill, genre, types on genre
taught to the second grade of Junior High School, Descriptive text, cooperative
learning, Student Teams-Achievement Division, the characteristic of Junior High
school students, hypothesis of the study, and theoretical framework.
2.1 Previous Studies
In this part the writer described some previous studies that relevant to this
final project. First, final project entitled The Use of Group Investigation (GI)
Method to Improve Students Reading Ability in Descriptive Text (A
Classroom Action Research with the Eighth Graders of MTs Sabilul Ulum
Mayong Jepara in the Academic Year of 2010/2011) by Mabruroh (2011),
Education Faculty Walisongo State Institute for Islamic Studies. It shows that
Group investigation (GI) can improve students achievement in reading ability
of Descriptive text.
Second, a final project under entitled The Use of Beauty and the Beast
Illustrated Version as Narrative Reading Material (An Experimental Study at
the Eighth Grade Students of SMP Negeri 1 Mungkid in the Academic Year of
2006/2007) by Hidayah (2007), English Department Faculty of Languages
and Arts Semarang State University. Her final project shows that Beauty and
the Beast illustrated version can be used to improve the students ability in
10
11
reading comprehension between the class using Beauty and the Beast
illustrated version and without using Beauty and the Beast illustrated version.
From the previous studies above, the writer can conclude that the
relevancies of those researches with this research are they have same purpose
that is to improve the students ability in reading comprehension although
those researches are different in their methods and media. The first final
project used Group investigation method and the result was it could improve
students achievement in reading, while the second final project used Beauty
and the Beast illustrated as media and it also could improve students ability in
reading comprehension. The writer tried to use Student Teams-Achievement
Division as a method in conducting this research, because to add the
reference in teaching reading research. The subject was junior high school
students.
2.2 General Concept of Reading
Reading is one of the language skills that should be mastered by the
students. There are some definitions from the experts to make us understand
about reading. Stuffer (in Petty and Jensen, 1980:207) as cited in Hidayah
(2007:12) states:
a. Reading is a complex process.
b. Reading means to get information from printed page.
c. Reading is the ability to pronounce and comprehend the printed words.
d. Reading is interpreting sign, letters, symbols, by assigning meaning to
them.
12
e. Reading is receiving ideas and impression from an author via the printed
page.
On the other side, Linse, (2006:69) says reading is a set of skills that
involves making sense and deriving meaning from the printed word. Grabe &
Fredericka (2003: 9) as quoted by Untung (2013:36) define that reading is the
ability to draw meaning from the printed page and interpret this in-formation
appropriately.
From the various definitions above, it can be concluded that reading is
used to analyze print material. Through reading the readers can analyze the
writers purpose so that the reader can get information, meaning and message
from what they read. Reading is also a process of matching information
since the activity of reading is the reader matches his information that
he already had with the printed page in order to get the message.
In reading, there are some strategies to make understand about the content
of reading material. The strategies can connect between the text and what the
readers already know, these strategies are:
a. Making prediction
b. Visualize
c. Ask and answer questions
d. Retell and summarize
e. Connect the text to live experiences, other text and prior knowledge.
http://www.reading-tutors.com (Retrieved October 7 2013, at 12:11)
13
Generally, the main purpose of reading are reading for pleasure and
reading for information. Reading for pleasure if reading can be used for
entertainment and the readers get pleasure from printed material, for instance
reading stories. On the other hand, reading for information if the readers can
get the information from that printed material, for example reading passage.
It is important to judge the purpose of reading. Burns, Roe, and Ross
(1984:202) as cited in Hidayah (2007:15) explain that all reading done by
children should be purposeful because (1) children who are reading with a
purpose tend to comprehend what they read better than those who have no
purpose; and (2) children who read with a purpose tend to retain what they
read better than those who have no purpose.
There are some types of reading, Brown (2004:186-187) explains about
types (Genres) of reading are as a follow:
a. Academic reading
General interest article (in magazine, newspaper, etc)
References material (dictionary)
Textbook, thesis
Essay, paper
Test direction
Editorials and opinion writing
b. Job-related reading
Messages (e.g. phone message)
14
Letters/email
Memos
Reports (e.g. job evaluation, project report)
Schedule, labels, sign, announcements)
Forms, application, questionnaires
Financial document (bills, office, etc)
Direction
c. Personal reading
Newspaper, magazine
Letters, email, greeting card, invitation
Messages, notes, list
Schedule (train, bus, air plane)
Menu, map, calendar
Advertisements (commercial, wand ads)
Novel, joke, drama, poetry
Financial document (check)
Comic strip
Medical report, immigration documents, questionnaire, forms.
2.3 Reading Comprehension
According to Linse (2006:71), reading comprehension refers to reading for
meaning, understanding, and entertainment. While, Anderson (2001) as cited
in Linse (2006:71) states that reading comprehension is a purpose of reading.
15
material.
Here
are
some
principle
strategies
for
reading
comprehension;
a. Identify the purpose of reading text.
b. Apply spelling rules and convention for bottom-up decoding
c. Use lexical analysis (prefixes, suffixes, roots, etc.)
d. Guess the meaning (of words, idiom, etc.) from parts that are not certain.
e. Skim the text for the gist and for main ideas.
f. Scan the text for specific information (names, dates, keywords).
g. Use the silent reading technique for rapid processing.
h. Use marginal notes, outlines, charts, or semantic map for understanding
and retaining information.
i. Distinguish between literal and implied meaning.
j. Capitalize and discourse markers to process relationship.
(Brown 2004:188-189)
From the principles above, the writer concludes that the strategies in
reading comprehension are the readers identify the goal of the text, guess the
meaning and answer the questions to comprehend the content of the text.
16
17
18
The texts that include story genres are Narrative, News Story, Exemplum,
Anecdote, Recount and Spoof. Whereas in factual genres consist of Procedure,
Explanation, Report, Exposition, Discussion, Description, Review, News
Item, and Commentary.
2.5.1
competencies
and
basic
competencies
19
b. Descriptive text
According to Hartono (2005:6) Descriptive text is a factual
genre. Its social function is to describe a particular person, place, or
thing. The explanation about Descriptive text will be presented in
the next session.
c. Recount text
Recount text is a text that retells past evens. Its social function
is to retell past event for the purpose of informing or entertaining.
The schematic structures are:
1) Orientation, introducing the participants, place and time;
2) Events, describing series of event that happened in the past;
3) Reorientation, it is optional. Stating personal comment of the
writer to the story.
Linguistic features of Recount text are as a follows:
1) Focus on individual participant
2) The use of simple past tense
3) Circumstances of time and places
4) The use of material or action clauses. Hartono (2005:8)
According to the explanation above, the writer can conclude
that Recount text is a kind of text that describes something happened in
the past.
20
d. Narrative text
Narrative text focuses on a pattern of events with a problematic
and or unexpected outcome. The purpose of Narrative text is to
entertain the reader. For example: Cinderella story, Malin
Kundang, etc.
According to the Susilohadi, et al. (2008:136), a Narrative text
consists of the orientation, complication, and resolution.
1) Orientation
Tell about characters, place, time (if possible) and other things
to make the readers understand the story.
2) Complication
Tell about problems that happened in the story. Usually tell the
steps starting from how the problem arises up to the climax.
3) Resolution
Tell the anti-climax or the answer to the problem.
The language features of this text are:
1) Focus on specific participant
2) Use of past tense
3) Use of temporal conjunction and temporal circumstances
4) Use of material (or action) processes. Hartono (2005:7)
21
22
23
24
Identification
the Pacific Ocean, far away from any other land. There are
eight islands of different sizes, and while they differ from
each other in some ways, they share many features.
Description
Description
25
26
27
28
class, they have to move around the class to help students and group if
any problems in the learning. It is similarly with (Harel 1992:169)
explanations as quoted by Richard and Rodgers (2001:1990).
During this time the teacher interact, teaches, refocuses,
question, clarifies, support, expand, celebrates, empathizes,
depending on what problems evolve, the following
supportive behavior are utilized. Facilitator are giving
feedback, redirecting the group question, encouraging the
group to solve its own problem, extending activity,
encouraging thinking, managing conflict, observing students,
and supplying resources.
b. Learners roles
In cooperative learning, learners have to learn teamwork skills.
They should be able work together with their team members. Richard
and Rodgers (2001:1990) argue that the primary role of learner is the
members of group who must work collaboratively on task with other
members of group. Learner is taught to plan, monitor, and evaluate
their own learning.
2.7.3
29
b. Individual accountability
This is achieved in two ways. Group scores are averaged of individual
quiz scores and the other is task specialization, it mean that is each
student is given a unique responsibility for part of the group task.
c. Equal opportunities for success
A characteristic unique to the Student Team Learning method is the
use of scoring method that ensure all students an equal opportunity to
contribute to their team.
d. Team competition
In STAD and TGT, teams are motivated to compete, so they cooperate
within team.
e. Task specialization
In Jigsaw and Group Investigation, and the other task-specialization
method is the assignment given to each students.
f. Adaptation to individual needs
In TAI and CIRC, adapt instruction to students individual needs.
From the explanation above, the writer can conclude that there are
some characteristics of cooperative learning that distinctive with the other
methods, they are group goals, individual accountability, team
competition, task specialization, and etc.
2.7.4
30
31
32
33
that all team members have mastered the lesson. Finally, all students take
individual quizzes on the material, they must know the material, thus in
individual quizzes they may not help each other, (Slavin 1995:6).
Student Teams-Achievement Division is a general method of
organizing class. The focus of STAD is to motivate students to encourage
and help among members of team in mastering skills presented by the
teacher. Teacher can use their own lessons and other materials. The team
members in STAD are about four in different sex, level, and ethnicity. It
has purpose to make them help each other to master academic content.
Student Teams-Achievement Division (STAD) has been used to most
subjects including mathematics, language arts, and social studies. This
method is appropriate for teaching that defines subject, such as such as
mathematical computations and applications, language usage and
mechanics, geography and map skills, and science facts and concepts.
STAD is applied from grades two through college.
2.8.2
34
35
The teacher can use the material from John Hopskin Team Learning
Project, textbook or other sources or the material teacher-made. Slavin
(1995:73) explains, the material from John Hopskin are appropriate for
mathematics for grade two up ten, language art for grades three up eight
junior high school and physical science and the other topics. Though,
teacher can make own material; make worksheet, a worksheet answer
sheet, and quiz. In this session, teacher should give direction for students
to give full attention because it will help them do quizzes and their quizzes
determine their team score.
b.
Team
The members of team in Student Teams-Achievement Division
(STAD) involve four members in different sex, level, and ethnicity. A
four person team in a class that is half male and half female might have
two boys and two girl, or three white students and one minority
students. Thus, teacher that should chose the member of the group
because they will tend to choose others like themselves.
Slavin (1995:74) argues the steps to organize the team are as
follows:
1) Make copies of team summary sheet. Each group is given one
summary sheet.
2) On a sheet of paper, rank the students from highest to lowest in
the past performances.
36
37
38
Table 2.1
Improvement Point
Quiz score
Improvement
Point
5
10
20
30
30
Slavin (1995:80)
Awards
GOOD TEAM
GREAT TEAM
SUPER TEAM
39
40
team member master the material after they work and discuss
together.
f. Teacher with students score the test by discussing together. Students
are allowed to exchange the papers with members of other teams.
Then, teacher record students score by filling in the quiz score sheet.
g. Teacher gives certificate or other rewards for the best team based on
the degree of their quiz scores that higher than their base score and
award criterion.
h. Teacher returns the first set of quizzes (with the base scores, quiz
score, and improvements point) to the students. Thus, it can be
analyzed and improve the students achievement.
Slavin (1995)
2.9 The Characteristic of Junior High School Students
A Junior High school usually consists of students about eleven up to
fourteen years old who have different motivation from the students in higher
level like Senior High school and University. They are also in changing from
children to adolescent. In this phase, they are period of change, of new
experiences, of learning new roles and search for individual identity. It makes
them like challenges, peer approval and being forced among classmates and
friends.
Students in junior high school level like response to texts and sit with their
own thought than just answer questions or do abstract learning activities. Thus
the teachers should understand the psychological and characteristic of their
41
students because education and psychological are very related each other. Its
purpose is to design the appropriate and proper programs to fit the particular
requirements of individuals in this age group. Teacher should give students
tasks which they are able to do and also use interested method and media to
support learning process.
2.10
42
the null hypothesis into the alternative hypothesis if there was a significant
difference between teaching reading comprehension of Descriptive text
taught using Student Teams-Achievement Division method and without
Student Teams-Achievement Division method to the second grade
students of Junior High school in Tirto. It means that the null hypothesis
was refused and the alternative hypothesis was accepted.
2.11
Theoretical Framework
In this study, the writer made theoretical framework to make easy to
write the final project, the writer chose the theme Student TeamsAchievement
Division
and
Descriptive
reading
comprehension.
Effectiveness
Descriptive Reading
Comprehension
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHOD
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of Student
Teams-Achievement
Division
method
in
teaching Descriptive
reading
Where,
experimental group
control group
43
O2
O4
44
45
3.3.1
Population
Gall, et al. (2003:167) state that population refers to the larger group
that will be learned or researched. While according to Urdan (2010:1) a
population is an individual or group that represents all the members of a
certain group or category of interest.
The objects in a population are investigated, analyzed, and concluded
before the conclusion is finally valid to the whole population. The aim of
this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of Student Teams-Achievement
Division (STAD) method in teaching Descriptive reading comprehension.
Therefore the writer chose students in second grade of SMP N I Tirto in
the academic year of 2013/2014 as population. The total number of
population was 239 students divided into seven classes.
3.3.2 Sample
Urdan (2010:1) explains that sample is a subset drawn from the larger
population. According to Gall, et al. (2003:167) sample is a process to
select a sample from a defined population with the intent that the simple
accurately represent that population.
The first step in sampling was defining the target of population.
Sometimes the number of population is too big and out of reach. This part
must have the characteristics that represent the whole population.
According to Arikunto (2002:109), sample must have characteristics that
can represent all the population observed in the research. If the population
46
is more than 100 persons, we may take 10-15 percent or 20-25 percent or
more from the population.
The writer used cluster random sampling to select sample. There were
7 classes of the eighth grade of SMP N 1 Tirto. The writer chose two
classes as samples, they were class VIII F as the experimental group and
the control group was class VIII A. Thus, the writer took 66 students and
they equal to 28 percent of the whole population. So, the sample
represented all the population.
3.4 Procedures of the Study
In this study the writer chose two classes that equated as early as possible.
Because using the same classroom, they got the same condition and made this
research more reliable. The writer chose class VIII F as the experimental
group and class VIII A as the control group. Before giving the treatment, the
writer conducted a pre-test to both classes are experimental group and control
group as sample to measure the condition before treatment (01). It was
conducted on May 19th, 2014. The test consisted of 30 items in the form of
multiple choices.
After conducting a pre-test, the writer gave a treatment to both groups. The
experimental group was treated by using Student Teams-Achievement
Division method in teaching Descriptive reading comprehension on May
22nd, 2014, whereas the control group was given treatment without Student
Teams-Achievement Division method on May 24th, 2014. This treatment had
47
Division
as
method
to
teach
Descriptive
reading
48
Name of Students
Aspect of Observed
A
B
C
D
Total
Maximum Score
Average Score
Percentage
Total
49
Score 3
Score 2
fair, if the students condition is far from the same as the criteria
50
51
c. Test
Gall, et al. (2003:189) state test is any structured performance situation
that can be analyzed to yield numerical scores from which inferences can
be made about how individuals differ in the performance construct
measured by the test.
There are some characteristics of a good test as a follows:
1) Objectivity
2) Standard condition of administering and scoring
3) Standard for interpretation
4) Fairness
5) Validity
6) Reliability
(Gall, et al. 2003:190)
In this study, the test was given after treatment to the both group. The
purpose of this instrument was to measure the students achievement after to
be taught by using STAD to the second grade in SMP N 1 Tirto.
d. Interview
According to Gall et al. (2003:222), interview consists of oral questions
asked by interviewer and oral responses by the research participants. This
instrument was used to know what were the students difficulties faced by the
students in studying Descriptive reading comprehension.
52
The writer conducted interview after the treatment of Student TeamsAchievement Division method.
3.7 Variable of the Study
According to Urdan (2010:11), variable is any construct with more than
one value that is examined in research. In this study, the writer used two
variables, they were dependent and independent variable.
a. Dependent variable (Y)
According to Cohen (2007:504), dependent variable is a variable,
that which causes, in part or in total, a particular outcome; it is a stimulus
that influences a response, an antecedent or a factor which may be
modified to affect an outcome. Based on the definition, the dependent
variable of this study was the students achievement which was indicated
by the score of Descriptive reading comprehension test.
b. Independent variable (X)
Urdan (2010:11) explains that a variable on which the values of the
independent variable are hypothesized to depend. From the definition, the
independent variable of this study was the use of Student TeamsAchievement Division method in teaching reading comprehension.
3.8 Validity of the Test
Validity shows the validity of instrument, it is the most important criterion
of an effective test. Gall, et al. (2003:31) says validity as the degree to which
evidence and theory support the interpretation of test scores entailed by
proposed uses of test. To find out whether the test has content validity, the
53
writer arranged the test items dealing with Descriptive text. To convince that
the test was valid, the writer asked her advisor to check them up. A test is to
have empirical validity if it can show the evidence that the test scores have a
high correlation to some criterion such as the mark the students got. In this
research the writer used the item validity and calculates them by using the
Pearson Product Moment formula. The formula is like this:
Figure 3.2
Pearson Product Moment Formula
Where,
coefficient of correlation between x and y variable or validity of
each item.
the number of students/subject participating in the test.
the sum of score in each item.
x2
y2
54
Where:
r11
total of varian
Sugiyono (2007:361)
3.10
Difficulty Level
After the try out was conducted, an item was analyzed to evaluate the
effectiveness of the items and whether it was requirement of a good test
item or not. Each of the items was classified into difficulty level by using
this formula:
55
Figure 3.4
Difficulty Level
Where:
item difficulty
number of students who answered the item correctly
number of students
The difficulty level of each item can be determined by using these
following categorizations:
0
Discrimination Power
The discriminating power is used to measure the test items because it
could identify the differences in the competence of the students. The writer
used this formula to discriminate power of test item.
Figure 3.5
Discrimination Power
56
Where:
discriminating power
number of students in the upper group who answered the item
correctly.
number of students in the lower group who answered the item
correctly.
number of all students in the upper group.
number of all students in the lower group.
The criteria of the discriminating power are:
D 0,2
is poor
is insufficient
is sufficient
is good
Heaton (1975, 175) cited by Hidayah (2007:33-34).
3.12
57
Figure 3.6
T-Test Formula
Where:
t
t-value
the mean of the experimental group.
the mean of control group
3.13
Scoring Rubric
An experimental research usually has pre-test and post-test to gather
the data. Pre-test is conducted before giving the treatment to the
experimental and control class. After the treatment, post-test is conducted
to know the effect after the treatment is given. The writer conducted a test
that consisted of 30 multiple choice items of Descriptive text. The scoring
rubric will be shown below:
58
Table 3.2
The Scoring Rubric
Criteria
Score
Correct answer
Incorrest answer
No answer
1
0
0
Table 3.2 shows the scoring rubric that can be attained from the
criteria on the table above.
The assesment guidelines of this research are:
1. Correct answer, each number gets score 1
2. Maximum score 30
3. Students mark
100
CHAPTER IV
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
This chapter analyzes each of the data gathered from the experimental
research activities. The analysis of each activity started from tryout, pre-test up to
post-test, observation during teaching learning process and the analysis of
interview. The chapter is divided into the following topics:
4.1 Result
The result consists of the result of tryout, the result of mean and deviation
of experimental group, the result of mean and deviation of control group, the
result of t-test, the result of observation and the result of interview.
4.1.1
59
60
Where,
coefficient of correlation between x and y variable or validity
of each item.
the number of students/subject participating in the test.
the sum of score in each item.
x2
y2
61
rtable (0.519
0.334).
From all computations, it was obtained that from 50 test items;
there were 45 test items which were valid, there were number 1, 2, 3,
4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 26,
28, 29, 30, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 46, 47, 48,
49, 50 and 5 test items which were invalid, there were number 19, 22,
27, 31, and 45.
The invalid items were not given for experimental and control
group. The writer computed all of validity items by using Pearson
Product formula in Ms. Excel. The computation all of items can be
seen in appendix 10.
b. Reliability Analysis
The writer used the Kuder Richardson (KR21) formula to measure
the reliability of the test, as follows:
Figure 4.2
Kuder Richardson (KR21) formula
Where:
r11
62
total of varian
Sugiyono (2007:361).
the rtable with the number of subjects (N) = 35 and significance level
5% it was 0.334. It can be said that item number 1 is reliable because
r11
rtable (0.96
0.334).
63
Figure 4.3
Difficulty Level
Where :
item difficulty
number of students who answered the item correctly
number of students
Then, the computation was consulted with these following
categorizations:
0
is easy
From the result of computation above, the writer concluded that the
difficulty level of item no 1 was 0.57 and could be categorized into
64
easy item. The writer also computed all items of discrimination power,
as follows:
1) Item number 9, 34, 39 were categorized into very easy item.
2) Item number 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 20, 23,
24, 25, 26, 29, 30, 32, 33, 35, 36, 37, 40, 41, 42, 43, 45, 46, 47,
48, 49, 50 were categorized into easy item.
3) Item number 3, 5, 10, 15, 21, 27, 28, 31 were categorized into
medium item.
4) Item number 19, 22 were categorized into difficult item.
The writer computed by using discrimination power formula in
Ms. Excel and the result could be seen in appendix 11.
d. Discrimination Power
To measure the test items that can identify the differences in the
competence of the students. The writer used this formula to
discriminate power of test items.
Figure 4.4
Discrimination Power
Where:
discriminating power
65
is poor
is insufficient
is sufficient
is good
Heaton (1975, 175) cited by Hidayah (2007:33-34).
8
18
66
0.14
The result of D
67
Table 4.1
The Result of Mean and Deviation of Experimental Group
Student
S-1
S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5
S-6
S-7
S-8
S-9
S-10
S-11
S-12
S-13
S-14
S-15
S-16
S-17
S-18
S-19
S-20
S-21
S-22
S-23
S-24
S-25
S-26
S-27
S-28
S-29
S-30
S-31
S-32
S-33
Pre-Test (X1)
56
66
66
70
60
66
70
53
70
66
56
53
66
43
86
66
66
76
53
66
60
66
53
66
60
63
60
63
43
63
60
66
56
2053
Experimental Class
Post-Test (X2) Differences (X)
86
30
90
24
83
17
60
-10
76
16
76
10
83
13
86
33
86
16
80
14
86
30
76
23
86
20
76
33
93
7
90
24
90
24
86
10
83
30
76
10
83
23
70
4
73
20
73
7
86
26
86
23
83
23
90
27
70
27
83
20
76
16
83
17
70
14
2674
621
X2
900
576
289
100
256
100
169
1089
256
196
900
529
400
1089
49
576
576
100
900
100
529
16
400
49
676
529
529
729
729
400
256
289
196
14477
68
2
2
2
4.1.3
Pre-Test (Y1)
80
73
63
80
63
56
Control Class
Post-Test (Y2) Differences (Y)
80
0
76
3
60
-3
83
3
70
7
76
20
Y2
0
9
9
9
49
400
69
S-7
S-8
S-9
S-10
S-11
S-12
S-13
S-14
S-15
S-16
S-17
S-18
S-19
S-20
S-21
S-22
S-23
S-24
S-25
S-26
S-27
S-28
S-29
S-30
S-31
S-32
S-33
70
90
70
53
63
76
70
66
60
76
53
36
70
66
53
66
53
63
66
53
60
76
60
56
60
56
70
2126
66
80
60
70
70
83
76
70
80
76
80
70
70
83
60
73
60
66
70
76
63
76
73
76
80
80
73
2405
-4
-10
-7
17
7
7
6
4
20
0
27
34
0
17
7
7
7
3
4
23
3
0
13
6
20
24
3
279
16
100
49
289
49
49
36
16
400
0
729
1156
0
289
49
49
49
9
16
529
9
0
169
36
400
576
9
5885
Based on table above, the mean and deviation of control group could
be computed below:
The mean computation of the control group
70
2
2
2
4.1.4
Where
t-value
the mean of the experimental group.
mean of control group
x2 the deviation of the experimental group
y2
71
From the computation above, the t-test was 4.25. Then it was
consulted with t-table. The writer used the 5% (0.05) level of significance.
There are 33 students in experimental group and 33 in control group,
hence the number of students was 66. The degree of freedom was 64,
because
72
The result of t-table was 1.669 and the t-value was obtained 4.25.
Therefore, the t-value was higher than t-table
. It could be
73
Name of Students
S-03
S-31
S-04
S-11
S-12
S-14
S-06
S-21
S-05
S-28.
S-10
S-16
S-32
S-07
S-20
S-26
S-08
S-13
S-25
S-27
S-01
S-18
S-23
S-30
S-22
S-32
S-09
S-19
S-02
S-15
S-17
S-24
S-29
Total
Aspects of Observed
A
B
C
4
2
3
4
2
2
3
3
3
4
3
4
4
4
3
4
3
4
4
3
3
4
2
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
3
3
3
4
4
3
2
4
4
4
4
3
3
4
3
3
4
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
2
4
4
3
4
3
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
4
4
2
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
3
129
114
108
Total
D
3
3
2
3
2
4
3
2
3
4
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
98
12
11
11
14
13
15
13
11
15
16
13
14
13
12
15
13
13
13
16
13
14
13
14
15
13
15
13
13
14
16
15
14
14
449
74
Maximum Score
Average Score
Percentage
132
3.90
97%
132
3.45
86%
132
3.27
81%
132
2.96
74%
528
13.60
85%
According to the table above, the first aspect was A, the students
concern towards teachers explanation. The result of aspect A was most of
students concern towards teachers explanation and it could be seen from
point 4 that were gotten by them. Yet, there were some students got point
3, it indicated that they listened to the teachers explanation but did other
activity that is not related with learning activity. Most of students
concerned when the teacher explained the material, but there were boys
who talked to their friends when the teacher explained material in the front
of the class.
Aspect B was the students cooperate in group. Most of students got
point 4, it showed that students took active part in group cooperation
correctly and can associate with member of group well. There were
three students got point 2, it indicated that they took active part in
cooperation, but could not associate with member of group. Some groups
cooperated to answer questions, besides there were some groups who did
not associate because only girl member who discussed in group
discussion.
Aspect C was the students activeness in answering questions in
group. Table above showed that there were 14 students got point 4, it
indicated that they gave complete answer without helped by the teacher.
75
14 students got point 3, it showed that they gave answer but helped by the
teacher. Point 2 were gotten by five students, they gave answer the
question but the answer was not match. Some students could answer
questions without any helps by the students because they had understood
the material after discussed together with their teammates.
The last aspect was D, the students activeness in asking question.
Most of students asked question as many as possible, but the question was
not focus of the problem and it could be indicated from point 3 that were
gotten by them. Students were active in asking question, but it was out of
focus on problem. Some students asked the teacher about the meaning of
multiple choices answer.
From the result of observation discussion above, the percentage of the
observation was gathered 85%, then it was consulted with assessment
percentage explanation. Hence, it could be categorized into good
learning.
4.1.6
76
five questions for English teacher and five questions for students. The
interview guideline could be seen in appendix 26.
The writer concluded the English teachers interview from number 1
up to 5. The first question was how is the students reading ability?. The
reading ability of students in second grade was average. The second
question was How many students do they get reading lesson, in a week?.
The reading lesson is one time a week. The third question was Do you
find the difficulties in teaching reading comprehension?. The difficulty
that was faced by the students that was the less of students vocabulary
and they were so lazy to find the meaning in dictionary. The fourth
question was Have you ever heard about STAD before?. The teacher
said yes, she had ever heard about STAD. The fifth was What do you
think about STAD?. According to the teacher, STAD was a good method
because learning with their friends made the students were interested and
enthusiastic to learn and find the meaning of vocabulary from the text.
The writer concluded the result of students interview from question
number 1 was Do you like reading lesson?. All of students answered
yes, so it could be concluded that they like reading lesson. The second
question was What is your opinion about reading lesson with Student
Teams-Achievement Division method?. The writer concluded that all of
students were interested with STAD because they liked studying with their
friends. They could help each other and discuss material and answer
question together.
77
The third question was Do you like it? Why?. From the students
answer, the writer could conclude that they liked reading lesson with
STAD. They liked being was taught using STAD because it was a new
atmosphere that different from teaching learning process as usual, so it
was not monotonous.
The fourth question was Do you feel enjoy when you were taught
using STAD? Why?. The answer of students was they felt enjoy were
taught using STAD because they could study together and discuss the
material was given by the teacher, so they did not think alone.
The fifth question was Do you any improvement in your reading
ability after the teaching learning process using STAD?. All of students
answered Yes, they got a little improvement in reading ability. It could
be seen from the result of post-test was higher than pre-test.
4.2 Discussion
78
79
teacher copied summary for each team, worksheet and worksheet answer
sheet two copies for each team. After that, students discussed and solved
the problem or something that did not understand yet about the material,
and also answered worksheet together. They worked in pair within group.
The worksheet could be seen in appendix 22.
The third step is quizzes. After the discussion had finished, teacher
gave them an individual test to know how far they understood about the
material that was discussed together with teammates. They were not
permitted to help each other though they studied together. After it had
done, papers were exchanged with the other members of their team to
score it. Quiz score sheet could be seen in appendix 23.
The fourth step was team recognition. After quizzes finished to be
scored, the teacher announced the super team and gave them award.
Teacher determined the level of award based on averaging the
improvement point of each member in team. Team summary sheet could
be seen in appendix 24.
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS
In this chapter discusses some conclusions and suggestions of the study.
5.1 Conclusions
The main purpose of this study was to know whether there is any
significance difference in teaching Descriptive reading comprehension
between using Student Teams-Achievement Division (STAD) method and
without Student Teams-Achievement Division (STAD) method.
Based on the data which have been analyzed in previous chapters lead to
conclusion that:
a. STAD
method
was
effective
in
teaching
Descriptive
reading
comprehension, it was shown from the t-value was higher than t-table
. Thus, it could be concluded that there was a significance
difference in the students reading comprehension taught using STAD in
experimental group and without STAD in control group.
b. STAD method application in teaching Descriptive reading comprehension
made the students were willing to participate in group discussion, active,
and serious to finish the task in group, hence they were motivated in
reading Descriptive text. Differences with the conventional method that
made the students got bored and not interested in learning. The problem
that was faced in STAD method application was some students could not
cooperate with members in group, they did activity that not related with
80
81
REFERENCES
Alawi, Fikri F. 2011. Improving Students Ability in Writing Descriptive Text
Using Clustering Technique. Final Project. Jakarta: Syarif Hidayatullah
State Islamic University
Gall, M.D., Gall, J.P., and Borg, W.R. 2003. Educational Research an
Introduction (7th Edition). USA: Allyn and Bacon
Hidayah, Nurul. 2007. The Use of Beauty and the Beast Illustrated version as
Narrative Reading Material. Final Project. Semarang: Semarang State
University
82
83
Hyland, Ken. 2004. Genre and Second language Writing. London: University of
Michigan Press
Young
Priyana, Joko et al. 2008. Scaffolding English for Junior High School Students
Grade VIII. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan, DEPDIKNAS.
84
Untung. 2013. The Effectiveness of English Learning through the Social Network
Sites in Enhancing the Students Speaking Competence. Journal of
Education. 3 (1) (2013). 1-36. Retrieved December 12 2013, at 10:26 from
http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej
Urdan, T.C. 2010. Statistics in Plain English (Third Edition). USA: Taylor and
Francis Group, LLC
Wardiman, Artono et al. 2008. English in Focus for Grade IX Junior High School
(SMP/MTs). Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan, DEPDIKNAS.
Widiarti, Utami et al. 2008. Contextual Teaching and Learning Bahasa Inggris:
Sekolah Menengah Pertama/Madrasah Tsanawiyah Kelas VIII Edisi 4.
Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional
UI\IVERSITAS PEKALONGAN
85
Nomor
Lampiran
: I 62/8.32.0 1 IFKIPIV
Hal
: Izin Penelitian
Yth. Kepala
SMP Negeri
I 20
2I Apil2Al4
I Tirto
Kabupaten Pekalongan
Di Tempat
Dengan hormaL
Bersama ini kami beritahukan bahwa mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Fakultas
Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas pekalongan :
Nama
NPM
GitaRianawati
:1004290921
izin
kepad
, S.Pd., M.Hum.
yang
85
SMP 1 TIRTO
TERAKREDITASI 'A *
Jl. RayaPacar 184 Tirto TeW.429497 Pekalongan 51151
SURAT. KETERANGAN
NOMOR
: 421.3 I
139
12014
Nama
GITA RIANAWATI
NPM
1004290921
Program Studi
Sl / Pendidikan
Fakultas /Jwusan
Benar
benar
telah
@xperimental Research
Teams
Balrasa Inggns
melaksanakan Penelitian
Slaipsi
TEACHING DESCRIPTTVE
IN
dengan baik
sebagaimana mestinya.
2014
199412 1 001
87
Appendix 3
The List of Experimental Group Students
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
Students
Abdul Fattah
Adelia Ayu Ningrum
Akmal Bahtiar
Anggita Anindia
Anggreini Wulandari
Arief Mustofa
Azza Zulfatin
Baskoro Dwiyanto
Choerul Mufid
Eko Hadi Wibowo
Farah Ainaya Ansirni
Intan Syahra Febiantika
Isnan Rizkianto
Khusnul Khotimah
Lutfian Hadiarso
M. Abdul Rozak
M. Dwi Andriyan
M. Maulana Majid
Mellyati Agustina
M. Mahfud L.
M. Erfandi
M. Hasyim Muzadi
Murni Yuliana
Muslimin
Nuzul
Puja Adi Saputra
Rina Anita
Sanada Ulfi Khikmah
Shinta Amelia Fitri
Suciati
Taufan Arifian
Teguh Budi Utomo
Teguh Imam S.
Code
S- 1
S- 2
S- 3
S- 4
S- 5
S- 6
S- 7
S- 8
S- 9
S-10
S-11
S-12
S-13
S-14
S-15
S-16
S-17
S-18
S-19
S-20
S-21
S-22
S-23
S-24
S-25
S-26
S-27
S-28
S-29
S-30
S-31
S-32
S-33
88
Appendix 4
The List of Control Group Students
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
Students
Agus Mahardika
Ali Nurdin
Annisa
Bayu Rizka Hidayat
Centio DEwi
Deni Hardiyanto
Dessy Surya R.
Dhani Chandra
Dimas Sidiq M.
Dina Nuril Aini
Dodi Rahman
Faisol Fahmi
Filza Rizkiana
Firman Nur Diyanto
M. Adi Darmawan
M. Firhan Aji I.K.
M. Rahmi
M. Taufiq Qurokhman
Maruf Albana
Moh. Adnan S.Y.
Nabillah Putri R.
Nur Fathirotul Azahro
Nurul Karima
Putrid Melinia
Rizqi Dewi Anggraini
Robby Krisyanto
Silmi Amiruna
Slamet Naufal Affandi
Sri Utari
Triana Octafiyanti
Tyas Desi Andayani
Ulul Azmi
Zafia Nurul Anam
Code
S- 1
S- 2
S- 3
S- 4
S- 5
S- 6
S- 7
S- 8
S- 9
S-10
S-11
S-12
S-13
S-14
S-15
S-16
S-17
S-18
S-19
S-20
S-21
S-22
S-23
S-24
S-25
S-26
S-27
S-28
S-29
S-30
S-31
S-32
S-33
89
Appendix 5
The List of Non-Treatment Group Students
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
Students
Abdul Rozak
Akbarudin
Aldinata
Ana Fitriana
Ashkarudin
Desti Fitriana
Fahrul Hidayat
Fakis Salsabila
Farichul Ilma
Fikri Safana
Ghani D.W.
Indah Novitasari
Ivan Alfian Y.
M. Alfan Mubarok
M. Bayu Aji
M. Giyo Salim
M. Iqbal
M. Puja Gustanto
Mukhafidzin
Nur Halimah
Nur Hidayah
Purwati
Rani Septianingrum
Riza Khumairoh
Salman Hikam
Shahibun Alim
Slamet Surono
Syarifatun Nabila
Teguh Setiaji
Umi Fitriyani
Umriyanti Zulfa
Widya Mardiana
Yogi Ferdianto
Zaenur Khustoni
Zahri Romadhoni
Code
S- 1
S- 2
S- 3
S- 4
S- 5
S- 6
S- 7
S- 8
S- 9
S-10
S-11
S-12
S-13
S-14
S-15
S-16
S-17
S-18
S-19
S-20
S-21
S-22
S-23
S-24
S-25
S-26
S-27
S-28
S-29
S-30
S-31
S-32
S-33
S-34
S-35
)iJ
,)
PRETEST
NAME
NO
!rr+4^
Nadl;ar@
TVt, I r}}rerI-
Aasl6.oro
ffi=*-
tvt.Mulane tnaild
{
Akr.^t l1-ht,u^r
M.rtoodi
#N'
6
7
F^ln
&,;A
+%a
4
5
I
10
Anata7 trn6,rni
Adrr2q 41u- p{rngrut3
,J6& L*-
Ktil
M
ffiY
dt"^
lvv
0'
ffi
ZuLFA.flF., 'hmmnnrwrwm
/zza
rt
A\
lttrwrumr;,
W*u
12
13
Ptttg
L4
15
16
l7
i8
19
20
21
22
24
25
Anttq
*t r,,'ni
l-rulu L
Shrnto arnefio fitr'
(qnada Ufi kftltman
Ar@ita', ztrirndia'P.
tahrxnuL phot imah
Mortrl0h flqur$nq
i..t$uini VutiOnor
fif,1uL C, (lbt,finc,
V(rY+ at?t e '
M l'\oh l-u;l
28
t/.tta,vlru M
29
lqnan Aullrni-o
'il e< U t-.\A t3 r,rd i U forr.arl
al
JI
32
JJ
34
35
36
7t
,/
$iw
Ari
;*
'[WY
r
ad
&W0PxQctn r',
n.Dld.
M' HosYlM'Muzod'
A8.ter nnuSIoFA
CHoGPUL PtlStP
4zfun"ri^2
:{J
F x#totf 0
JI{I\
.ffi',ff,
alttlJ$}dmt
Lili
*l fi'o
4t
"t17W
|-I
l-s'q/
,tdt
'21w
WZ'
\#-
<.*i
?v-
ZPfr-
r-
i-.\
[w4,vz
-4
:zU
%
,'t!
lhilu
nf,0
,4
R(-/
/-,
ffi
4VW
Gf>4
/1^,W,
LL
-ryN
fl.
/
(
,'7
=
1P
frNt,
fWW
j: 4z:
AW
W.
+P;
kn, o-
"ift
4/trek
llkhr,
frl ts,'
7W_
ht
/t
it..11
1CIffi)-
27
30
rygt$
-*t
17,,1 7
AT'fi1
rrY i,ho'
\rntavt lqat^rU F4*,,Trithx@
ArSf trrr' wu\ondori gffi{'xii{6l
il
W
I
w
l,rr[\
u o- t\
wfltfw+
,4i
Mrrfrl
DwiVqfil'b
POSTTEST
TREATMENT
-/,
'1
v1,,&
7I
NAMB
PRETEST
srr
urarf
Pafn Me/tnt.z
/4,r/^
-V
Lv
Irionq O6{aplqant
(W,,,
Ceneta d eu-tt
lj
Oo rl; , P-ah(non
[)pr.,
FiQrvton
tvl
10
ll
12
AU
fis1r$tyan*t
n$diIonu
$ tQ
r;u Ra lH
N {ll
M.
Dannl,
l'-l.u 1[r{nqn "(.r
(
A.q,oi
fi,ti
9r\ml Amiru0o\
t4 Tqas gosi hrDagani
15 Utbtutah Putrr E i.tr
t6 Nurqt ko\-trno
17
r.u?uL htt
Dtne
ANH\5A
\,rqq
22
T1\?6 $!f\tn?
N\ur farhirOcctl
R.iers=r Oetori A
23
24
Ma'ra
25
26
21
2B
29
30
31
JZ
JJ
34
35
36
37
Aat^
Alb,ancl
S\aoett lopEo\6pgrng
AAU,S filPlARDtxn
DHann LqNDDD n.
Bsqu RlzEa iltoa)J1
nt.ut-DlN
.*a*aAU F/&.6uao*
Er
tr^ffim,r
6M
|H4ry1177s$t
41,^r.L
[-n I,WIB.L
L
EA
fuk
r{$r'6r,.r
-&
ronL
i ri,YM.
@2_-*
t, 'trw
"1
ery
-{*4-ttl}.
.f"l
ddi,
Qrrq-.
a-*,
I fi ''Ql {'
W1^"
1"41)
"E
r
frtLltF
'l'4r-'
ktful4ttbbfr),P'
Alrrnq\A
hffi ,Ja-
Nkriiml.
6@-*
E"tdffir7" M@ffi.,
?rntrf,)/
,ffi
tVt
,@#
SLlm
Smrdfi
@a)*
W"W^+
1L
It/
't
'( l,'t
' )?tt t,-+
q4
}/,t
7:+.i't \l
/W
,'J*444
fr1,6\
@2--
-4ffifrfr
ryixr
.W
WA
l-&m,
bfu,tuL
frq^,
,|fu.
tffirl
A*ol s
Iab
fi6
frw
q-/
Oa
filifu"
POSTTEST
AW
$W
qhfrf
4,hfr*
rdtu&_u Tuu-fur ?.)\-,
3tfittn
6ffi,
ftus<., \ Tahnn.
AU
#Nd-<
kuffi.r*'
-fl^4
T)eeY
20
2l
1ilt-:
iYtffil
?
19
w'
/4-fls*
/),9.
L3
18
**-*-i)
JJ
//'U
b;(
TRtrATMENT
,if,!'*4-
/|Yv
"Fh*
7lt1
&A .(-
-qVltY,
'{M4 -
tu
Gr'?-/--'
92
NAMA
NO
I
S1-arifatun Nabila
,,,
Fakis Salsabila
Desti Fitriana
rJmriyanti Zulfa
P
D
I
Fikri Safana
Widla Mardiana
Asl*arudin
Zalrri Romadhoui
Mukhafidzin
10
M. Iqbal
L
L
1I
Riza Khurnairoh
t2
Rani Septraningrum
13
Ana Fitnana
Nur Halinrah
4
5
14
l5
' f(\^iP
L
/,
P
P
4{YNk{ rC.
:fr,W
1Q
Tcguh Setia.ji
23
M. Puja Gustanto
24
Salnran Hikam
25
Slarnet Surono
L
L
L
L
26
M.
Aji
27
Ghani D.W.
28
Akbarudin
L
L
29
M.
Cip
Salint
Abdul Rozak
32
YogiFerdianto
Farichul llma
JJ
L
L
L
3l
34
Al{bn Mubarok
Ivan Alfian Y.
35
Shahibun Alim
*r
T)
' '(M/
^ u---*
t
L
9L
L
Zffi,-
'alw,
22
30
ftri."j
L/
Ba1'u
#'o
+rnA
Fahrul Hida-yat
19
'-Br+h
2t
18
_Wi+{
&lb)
ZCI
t7
qril,-
vffi
ffisA
t
Umi Fitriyani
Indair Novitasari
Nur Hidayah
Puruati
Zaenur l(hustoni
Aldinata
16
TTD
LIP
/ar4rflr
'*-7'k>5
.HJ
Ytyt^L-
'#
fi
(-s,r
"
o^M1
-ffi-
\t{?"2
/1,1' '^{v1,t--
#n*
-<-49
93
Appendix 9
STATISTICAL DATA (TEST SCORES)
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
Experimental Class
Students
Pre
Test
Abdul Fattah
56
Adelia Ayu Ningrum
66
Akmal Bahtiar
66
Anggita Anindia
70
Anggreini Wulandari
60
Arief Mustofa
66
Azza Zulfatin
70
Baskoro Dwiyanto
53
Choerul Mufid
70
Eko Hadi Wibowo
66
Faroh Ainaya Ansirni
56
Intan Syahra F.
53
Isnan Rizkianto
66
Khusnul Khotimah
43
Lutfian Hadiarso
86
M. Abdul Rozak
66
M. Dwi Andriyan
66
M. Maulana Majid
76
Mellyati Agustina
53
M. Mahfud L.
66
M. Erfandi
60
M. Hasyim Muzadi
66
Murni Yuliana
53
Muslimin
66
Nuzul
60
Puja Adi Saputra
63
Rina Anita
60
Sanada Ulfi Khikmah
63
Shinta Amelia Fitri43
Suciati
63
Taufan Arifian
60
Teguh Budi Utomo
66
Teguh Imam S.
56
Post
Test
86
90
83
70
76
76
83
86
86
86
86
83
86
76
93
90
90
86
83
86
83
70
73
73
90
86
83
90
86
83
76
83
70
Control Class
Students
Pre
Test
Agus Mahardika
80
Ali Nurdin
73
Annisa
63
Bayu Rizka Hidayat
76
Centio DEwi
63
Deni Hardiyanto
56
Dessy Surya R.
70
Dhani Chandra
90
Dimas Sidiq M.
70
Dina Nuril Aini
53
Dodi Rahman
63
Faisol Fahmi
76
Filza Rizkiana
70
Firman Nur Diyanto
66
M. Adi Darmawan
60
M. Firhan Aji I.K.
76
M. Rahmi
53
M. Taufiq Q.
36
Maruf Albana
70
Moh. Adnan S.Y.
66
Nabillah Putri R.
53
Nur Fathirotul A.
66
Nurul Karima
53
Putri Melinia
63
Rizqi Dewi A.
66
Robby Krisyanto
53
Silmi Amiruna
60
Slamet Naufal A.
76
Sri Utari
60
Triana Octafiyanti
53
Tyas Desi Andayani
60
Ulul Azmi
56
Zafia Nurul Anam
70
Post
Test
80
76
56
83
66
76
66
80
63
60
63
80
60
70
60
76
80
70
70
83
60
73
60
66
66
76
63
76
66
76
70
80
73
n_,
-r{
A DDT]LT TI\i.
,l
ll-Fr
E-lTur-ar 'r1,
No. Res
I
s-21
s-09
S-
S- 5
/t
S- 2
S. 3
s-27
s07
s-34
t0
s-03
I1
s-01
t2
s-20
:x3
s-r4
r-)
I
I
s-04
s-06
l6
s-23
t7
s-02
l8
s-33
t0
lf.
8
I
(r
t4
0
I
I9
s-33
20
s-22
21
s-r9
22
s-08
t)
L)
s-24
24
s-29
25
s- 25
26
s-05
27-,
s-15
28
s-l I
29
s-
l6
30
til;3.11
s-t0
s- l7
,,.32,,',
s-1 8
::l-.i$3i
s-30
:34:
s-28
35:
s-26
Total
IT
l5
22
12
17
l3
20
19
16
26
13
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
Xx
l5
22
t2
17
l3
20
t9
t6
26
t3
Iy
908,00
908,00
908.00
908,00
908,00
908,00
908,00
908,00
908,00
908,00
rxv
506,00
676,00
414,00
569,00
412.00
655,00
o0,00
538,00
81
1,00
456,00
5,00
22,00
12,00
17,00
13,00
20,00
19,00
16,00
26,00
13,00
484,00
144,00
289,00
69,00
400,00
361,00
256,00
676,00
r69,00
Ix2
(rx)'
225,00
ry'
29466.00
29466,00
29466,00
29466,00
29466.00
29466.00
'J
29466,00
29466.00
29466,00
29466,00
(rv)'
824464,00
82446,1,00
824464.00
824464,00
32446,1.00
824464.00
824464.00
824464,00
32,1464,00
824464,40
NIxv-(Ix)(Iv)
4090,00
1684.00
1594,00
787 7,42
7691.42
0,519
0.479
rabel
0,334
0.334
Valid
Valid
V{NIx'z-(Ix)'z
{NIvz-(Iv)'z}
Criteria
44',79,00
26 I 6,00
4765,00
4448,00
4302,00
4',7'77.00
4156,00
795s,81
'7691.42
7877,42
7929,77
19)q 11
69-57,t 5
'7691.42
0,476
0,563
0,340
0,605
0,561
0,543
0,687
0,540
0,334
0.334
0.-134
0,334
0,334
0,334
0.334
0,334
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
nf
,-)
7I'
no
34
37
l5
36
3l
i9
:t0
(l
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
20
2t
26
22
2t
23
24
18
15
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
20
21
26
22
2t
23
908,00
908,00
908,00
908,00
908,00
908,00
908,00
232,00
670,00
617,00
793,00
729.00
675,00
7,00
20,00
21,00
26,00
22.00
21,00
49,00
400,00
441,00
676,00
484,00
44t,00
18
15
908,00
908,00
908,00
767,00
767,00
573.00
s03.00
23,00
24.00
529,00
576,00
8.00
15,00
324.00
225,00
29466,00
29166.00
29466,00
29466,00
29466.00
29466.00
29466,00
29466,00
29166.00
29466,00
824464,00
824464,00
824,16,1,00
824464,00
32446,1.00
824464,00
824464,00
821464.00
32.146,1,00
824464.00
t764,00
5290,00
4627,00
414't.00
4557,00
5961,00
50s3.00
3711,00
3985,00
6367.25
'787',7,12
'7798,25
6951,15
'7691.42
7798,25
7555.76
7389,68
7955,8r
787',7,42
0,277
0.672
o (o1
0,596
0.720
0,584
0,789
0,684
0.466
0,506
0,334
0,334
o 114
0,334
0,334
0,334
0,334
0.334
0.334
0,334
Ini,alid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
42
43
,+.+
45
41
48
19
50
v'
11
936
42
761
42
764
12
164
,11
168
39
152
39
152
39
152
-16
1296
35
33
1089
46
225
31
96r
31
961
3l
961
()
30
900
30
900
29
841
28
784
27
729
27
729
26
676
26
616
25
625
2t
441
2t
441
23
529
361
324
289
256
225
196
196
196
I
I
196
25
l5
19
17
18
16
22
22
22
20
908
29466
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
25
15
19
17
18
16
22
22
22
20
908,00
908,00
908,00
908,00
908,00
908,00
908,00
908,00
908,00
908,00
800,00
502,00
620,00
562.00
567,00
536,00
717
.00
7l 8,00
720,00
673,00
5,00
19,00
8,00
16,00
22,00
22,00
22,00
20,00
22s,00
361,00
324,00
256,00
484,00
484,00
484,00
400,00
25.00
625,00
7.00
289,00
29466.00
29466,00
29466,00
29466.00
29466.00
29466,00
29466,00
29466,00
29466,00
29166,00
824464.00
824464,00
824464.00
824464,00
824464,00
824464.00
824464,00
821,+61,00
824464,00
824464,00
-5300.00
3950,00
4448,00
4214.00
3501,00
4232.00
5 I 19,00
5154,00
5224,00
s39s,00
'7191.0'7
787't,42
795-S.81
7955,81
'7929;77
't691.42
7691,42
7691,42
7877,42
0,737
0,501
0,561
0.532
0,M0
0,534
0.666
0,670
0,679
0,685
0.33,1
0,334
0,334
0.334
0,334
0,334
0.334
0,334
0.334
0.334
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
Valid
,,
r DDl;rl.rnrl/
II
N0. item
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
34
11 01
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
27.9'1
27,97
27,97
27.9',7
)1 q'l
)1 01
2',7,97
2',7,97
)1 01
88,3 r
88,31
88.31
88.31
88.3 I
88.31
88.31
88.3 I
88.3 l
88,3r
1,03
1,03
1,03
1,03
1,03
l,03
1,03
1,03
I,03
96,60
196,60
196,60
196,60
r96.60
t96,60
196,60
3090.97
3090,97
3090.97
3090.97
3090.97
3090.97
3090.97
3090.97
3090.97
0,96
0,96
0,96
0,96
0,96
0,96
0,96
0,96
0.96
0,96
0.334
0.334
0.334
0.334
0.334
0,334
0,334
0.334
0334
Reliable
Reliable
Reliable
Reliable
Reliable
Reliable
Reliable
Reliable
Reliable
Reliable
15,00
14.00
14,00
13,00
9,00
16.00
3,00
12,00
4.00
I 1,00
17
t'l
t7
t'7
1',]
t7
l'7
t1
t1
l8
t7
t8
l8
l8
t8
t8
l8
l8
18
l8
0,55
0,43
0,49
0,49
0.36
0,44
0,38
0.37
0. r2
0.42
Good
Good
Good
Good
Sufllcient
Good
Sufficient
Sufficient
Poor
Good
23
23
22
l9
t4
2'.1
22
20
l6
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
r96,60
34
35
1,03
96.60
196,60
3090,97
0,66
0,66
0,63
0,54
0.40
0.11
0.63
0,57
0.20
0,46
Easy
Easy
Easy
Easy
Medium
Easy
Easy
!,asy
Difficuit
Easy
Dipakai
Dipakai
Dipakai
Dipakai
Dipakai
Dipakai
Dipakai
Dipakai
Dibuang
Dipakai
..=l
r,l
1Aa
ii-j1
2t
0
22
21
2-1
25
26
1.',1
2\)
2'a
10
t)
0
0
0
0
1
(.)
(.)
0
0
(.)
{.)
(.)
0
0
{..}
(.)
0
0
0
I
(.)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
l9
t'l
l5
t4
t2
25
2'7
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
27,97
?7,97
27,97
88.31
88,31
88,3
1,03
27,97
27,97
34
)1 01
)1 91
)7 q1
27,9',7
2',1,97
88,3r
88,3 I
88,31
88,3
88,3 l
88,31
t,03
1,03
1,03
1,03
1,03
1,03
1.03
1,03
196,60
196,60
196,60
196,60
96,60
r96,60
196.60
196,60
3090.97
3094.97
3090.97
3090.97
3090,97
3090,97
3090,97
3090,97
3090,97
0,96
0,96
0,96
0,96
0,96
0,96
0,96
0.96
0,96
0,334
0,334
0,334
0,334
0,334
0,334
0,334
o.734
0,334
Reliable
Reliable
Reliable
Rsliable
Reliable
Reliable
Reliable
Reliable
Reliable
Reliable
10,00
5,00
13,00
10,00
3,00
12,00
8,00
8,00
I4,00
,00
t'7
t7
17
t7
t7
t'7
t7
l8
l8
l8
l8
l8
l8
t7
l8
l8
t7
t8
0.1 3
0.54
0.3 r
0,54
0,59
0,19
0.36
0.32
0,33
Poor
Good
Sufficient
Good
Good
hxulficient
Sufficient
Suflicient
Sufficient
27
3090.97
96
Good
88.3
96,60
19
t7
l7
l5
t4
t2
25
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
15
0.26
0.54
0.49
0.49
0.43
0.40
0.34
0.71
0'1'1
Mediun
Difficult
Easy
Mediur
Mediurr
Fasv
Easv
Dipakai
Dibung
Dipakai
Dipakai
Dipakai
Dipakai
Dibuang
Dioakai
Dipakai
Dipakai
1l
12
1t
14
11
3S
l9
38
:10
(.1
(l
I
0
0
0
t)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
t)
0
0
0
0
0
0
t)
(.)
t)
21
it
23
23
23
29
l8
15
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
35
35
34
)1 q1
34
)1 01
27,97
27,97
2'7,9',1
2'7.97
27,97
27,97
2'1.97
)1 01
88.31
88.3 r
88,3 r
88,31
88,31
88,3 r
88,3
88,3 I
88,3 I
88.3
1,03
I,03
1,03
1,03
1,03
1,03
1,03
1,03
1,03
196,60
196,60
196,60
196,60
196,60
t96,60
196,60
196,60
196,60
3090.97
3090.97
3090.97
3090.97
3090.91
3090,97
3090,97
3090.97
3090,97
3090,97
0,96
0,96
0,96
0,96
0,96
0,96
0,96
0,96
0,96
0,96
0.334
0.334
0.334
0.334
0,334
0,334
0,334
0,334
0,334
Reliable
Reliable
Reliable
Reliable
Retiable
Reliable
Reliable
Reliable
Reliable
Reliable
4,00
16,00
14,00
15,00
16,00
3,00
17,00
r6,00
12,00
9,00
l4
ll
t7
1',7
t'7
t7
t7
t'7
t7
t7
11
t'7
18
l8
l8
18
l8
l8
l8
0,66
t8
n l)
l8
l0
0,78
0,33
0..r3
0.31
Good
Poor
Good
Sufficient
Good
Sufficient
Good
Sufficient
20
2l
3l
23
23
23
29
l8
15
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
10
0.7't
Poor
Good
ll
35
l8
0,
0.31
o 57
0.60
0,89
0,66
0,66
0,66
0,83
0,43
Medim
Easy
Easy
Very Easy
Easy
Easy
EaSy
Very Easy
Easy
Easy
Dibuang
Dipakai
Dipakai
Dibuang
Dipakai
Dipakai
Dipakai
Dipakai
Dipakai
Dipakai
0,5
I_r-1
104
Appendix 12
PRE-TEST
Answer the following question by choosing A, B, C or D based on the text!
This text is for no.1 to 2
Kediri is a name of a town. It is situated in a valley between the Kelud and
Wills mountains and inhabited by about 1.3 million people. In the centre of the
town there is a large hill which is called the Dathok Mountain. Because of the
topography of the region, Kediri is called a chilly town by the locals. There is a
big river called Brantas cutting off the centre of the town.
Besides temples, Kediri is also famous for its products like cigarettes and a
special kind of tofu or bean curd. This highly nutritious food is delicacy of Kediri
and has a distinctive taste. The cigarette factory dominates the towns economy
and employs the majority of the women labor force. Kediri and the cigarette
factory are inseparable and it is considered the big cigarette factory in Indonesia.
Most of the local people work in this factory. Those who do not work here are
farmers or traders.
Adapted from Detik-Detik Ujian Nasional Bahasa Inggris SMP/MTS 2010
1. Which one of distinctive taste?
A. The cigarette
2. Those who do not work here.. (Last sentence). The underline word
refers to.
A. the local people
B. the farmers
D. the traders
105
B. scratches
106
C. dots
D. rosettes
B. customers
107
C. counters
D. cassettes
C. Events
B. Orientation
D. Description
108
The big animal eats leaves, twigs, and certain kinds of grass. It searches
for food in the afternoon, after the sun goes down. During the hot part of the day,
it plays in the mud, turning and rubbing its body in the mud to feel cooler.
The animals always live in a very small group, and sometimes even live
alone. This Rhino is famous for its horn. Many hunters kill this animal for the
horn, which they sell at very high prices. Other people make medicine from
Rhinos horns. Many Rhinos die at the hands of these hunters. If this continuous
to happen, in another few years we will not be able to find Rhinos anymore.
Adapted from English for eighth grade Junior High School
11. Why it is difficult for Rhino turn its head to other side? Because of
A. its tick hard skin
D. its weight
C. Descriptive
B. Recount
D. Procedure
109
110
C. Orientation
B. Events
D. Description
C. Sailendra dynasty
B. Gupta architecture
D. a large stupa
C. old
B. new
D. popular
111
C. Far
B. Safe
D. Warm
C. On the ground
B. On the branches
D. On a certain object
C. Sweet fruits
B. Little insect
D. Nuts
C. Descriptive
B. Recount
D. Procedure
112
113
Good Luck
114
Appendix 13
POST-TEST
Answer the following question by choosing A, B, C or D based on the text!
The text is for question no. 1 to 2
Sragen is one of the regencies of central Java. The Sragen regency usually
called Tlatah Sukowati is 941.555 km2 with the topographies as follows: in the
middle of the area as flows the longer river in Java, Bengawan Solo; in the
southern of Sragen is a slope of mount Lawu; in the northern part is the hillside of
Kendeng mountain; and in the western part is a famous region is called The
Sangiran Dome.
One of the interesting tourist objects in Sragen is the Sangiran museum
which is built in the Sangiran Dome. The dome itself is situated in the depression
of Solo in the north-west slope of mount Lawu. This area is about 56 km2 which
consists of three districts in the Sragen regency, they are the Gemolong,
Kalijambe, and Pupuh districts and one in the Karanganyar regency (the Gondang
Rejo district). Sangiran is the most important site for the development of various
fields of knowledge: anthropology, archeology, biology, and geology.
Adapted from Detik-Detik Ujian Nasional Bahasa Inggris SMP/MTS 2010
1. What passes through the middle of the Sragen regency?
A. The Plupuh district
B. The Kendeng Mountain
C. The Sangiran Dome
D. The Bengawan Solo River
2. This area is about 56 km2 which consists (Paragraph 2)
The underline phrase refers to
A. the Sangiran Dome
115
B. My dog
D. My fish
116
fruits, eggs, coffee, and etc. people can bargain before they decide to buy
anything.
The location is convenient. People can park easily and it is safe. Nobody
tries to steal your money or goods. Usually there are young porters who offer to
carry your shopping to the nearest bus stop. The sellers are king and helpful. They
are always be patient to serve people even though they keep bargaining
People can see why Jatinegara market is very popular in East Jakarta. The
prices are reasonable and the products are good. That is why people like to shop
there.
7. The main idea of the third paragraph is
A. The sellers are kind and helpful.
B. The sellers sell fresh food, vegetables, meat. Fruits, and etc
C. There are some reasons why people like the shop in Jatinegara
D. Jatinegara market is the popular market in the East Java
8. People like to shop in Jatinegara market because
A. it is the most complete market
B. it is not easy to park
C. the sellers are not patient to serve
D. the prices are expensive
9. The prices are reasonable and.. (Last paragraph)
The underline word has same meaning with..
A. cheap
C. acceptable
B. expensive
D. understandable
117
of Manado and five islands: the Bunaken, Manado Tua, Siladen, Mantehage, and
Nain.
Benaken is about 45-60 minutes by boat from Manado. It is the most
amazing driving place in the world. The waters of Bunaken National Marine Park
are extremely deep (1.560 meters in Manado bay). However, people can dive
safely at Bunaken. The temperature is about 270-290 Celsius. Divers can find
corals, fish, spongers, clams, and other see species in the water. Bunaken has
about 60 kinds of corals and a thousand of fish species.
Bunaken Marine Park is such a treasure trove of biodiversity.
Adapted from FUN for Children
10. The first paragraph in the text above is..
A. Identification
C. Events
B. Orientation
D. Description
D. its weight
118
C. Descriptive
B. Recount
D. Procedure
119
C. the engineers
B. thousands of people
D. the tourist
19. Pisa would hate to lose its precious Campo dei Miracoli (The last
sentence). The underline word has same meaning with
A. amazing
C. useless
B. valuable
D. credible
120
C. Mantehage
B. In Europe
D. In England
C. Far
B. See
D. Enjoyable
121
C. short horns
B. brown spot
D. thick lashes
C. Descriptive
B. Recount
D. Procedure
through
Kedungjati.
unpolluted fresh air to breathe. The Ambarawa Railway Museum is wellmaintained. It is a medium-sized building. The railway route is offered to visitors.
You can enjoy the beautiful panorama during the route. All in all, this is a truly
exciting treasure to visit.
(Source: Dit. PSMP, 2006)
122
26. The following statements are true based on the text above,
EXCEPT
A. Ambarawa Railway Museum is located in Semarang, Central Java
B. The panorama during the route is beautiful
C. Ambarawa railway Museum has fresh air.
D. Ambarawa railway Museum is far from the capital of Central Java
27. The first paragraph in the text above is..
A. Identification
C. Events
B. Orientation
D. Description
C. perfect
B. good
D. new
Good Luck
123
Appendix 14
ANSWER KEY
Pre-Test Items
1. B
2. A
3. B
4. B
5. A
6. C
7. B
8. A
9. B
10. A
11. A
12. C
13. C
14. A
15. C
16. C
17. A
18. A
19. C
20. A
21. A
22. C
23. D
24. B
25. C
26. C
27. A
28. A
29. D
30. C
11. A
12. B
13. C
14. B
15. C
16. A
17. C
18. A
19. B
20. B
21. A
22. B
23. A
24. B
25. C
26. D
27. A
28. C
29. C
30. B
Post-Test Items
1. D
2. A
3. C
4. D
5. A
6. B
7. D
8. A
9. A
10. A
124
Appendix 15
Answer sheet
Score
PRE-TEST
Name :
Roll No :
B C
11
B C
21
B C
B C
12
B C
22
B C
B C
13
B C
23
B C
B C
14
B C
24
B C
B C
15
B C
25
B C
B C
16
B C
26
B C
B C
17
B C
27
B C
B C
18
B C
28
B C
B C
19
B C
29
B C
10
B C
20
B C
30
B C
21
B C
22
B C
23
B C
24
B C
25
B C
26
B C
27
B C
28
B C
29
B C
30
B C
Answer sheet
Score
POST-TEST
Name :
Roll No :
B C
11
B C
B C
12
B C
B C
13
B C
B C
14
B C
B C
15
B C
B C
16
B C
B C
17
B C
B C
18
B C
B C
19
B C
10
B C
20
B C
l^E
Appendix l6
Answer.t.* frg -
lName
'
J-et
J-rrl-.f,'al @ot'o.6
-l
RolrNo 't6
class/group :
I
2
a
f
--
eryef MgWql
ABCX
A
KBCD
X.c
ABCy-.
A x.c D
i7
K.B C D
l0
AY.C D
lz A Bx'D
A B s..D
14
A B CF
k{ X.BCD
I6 A B
Y.D
11
X,B C D
A F-C D
1718
t9
X-.8 C
20
Name
RoliNo
,AL
{.8 c
?
22
T3
Ax.c D
Answer sheet
I
00
0
24
25
26
27
ts.e c D
A B A'D
{.e c D
28
29
30
B ,&..D
A Bx.D
X-B C D
x-F.
A B ['n
Y.D
.B C
{u
A B C.)e-_*
A B F.D
6sl
Pre -T? st
:9tldati
: bt.
Class/grciup : egL9ennmtat'6r0ttP'
I
'2
A B CX
)x ABCR
XB C D
tz
7 A BX'
4
Ax c D
5
6
7
8
E
10
AX C D
A Bx D
Axc
xBCD
A Bx,D
xB c D
15
ABXD
A ts KD
KB C D
A,BKD
xBCD
t3
v
J4
A BY
rv ABcy
AXCD
20
xB c D
6'lg
24
ABY,D
ABCX
23
24
25
26
27
28
7v
30
ABCX
XBCD
ABKD
A Bx D
XBCD
xBcD
XBcD
ABxD
LZO
Appendix l7
Students' Answer sheet of Post-Test of Experimental Group
I
lAnswer sheet
I
- Test
'-!-6(ialr
1osL
'Na*e
'
RollNo
{oa'^*-*o
9s
lb.
Class/group
1
g tal
12
B"
xC
rB C
10
18
19
20
posL
lName
: 5uahH'
Roll No
)
J
-q
5
6
7
8
, EX?eriruanboi /
ABCX
XB C D
AXcD
A B CX
xBcD
A BFD
AACD
\B
-r ABCD
BCD
10
A B KD
KB C D
$r
3t'
Class/group
I
T'est
Answer sheet
l
}CS C
anh*t
AX.CD
t2 A B
X, D
t3 A BF D
)1 KB C D
AByD
15
16
A BY D
l1
t7
18
19
20
xBCD
r.B c D
A.BXD
BCD
9=
2s
^.'
Appendix 18
Students' Answer Sheet of Pre-Test of Control Group
No
$u
:08
l1
tr<
e2
><
D
D
A
A
X
A
Y-l
rs
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
l0
F<
A
A
A
A
A
A
t2
13
t4
15
16
17
l8
t9
20
i
b<
A
><
p
\<!
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
Y
\4
tl
!.7
t5
N'
A7
><
A
B
B
><
A.
A
A
30
A
A
><'
><
C
B
B
{8
a9
D
D
D
D
D
,l
><
D
D
><
D
F-
.D
D
D
D
D
G
C
l'
Answer sheet
Name ,&rrY
Suryg 8 -
]O
I
RollNo . O7
Class/group , *,, A (aonWo\ <\ass)
i A B CX
LK >(BCD
.y
J
/{
6
7
8
t6
A *X'
A B KD
A B cx
A B C>K'
A BxD
l*/
ABC
18
A B )(D
AXC
Ia
LL
AXC D
A B cy
A BXD
aflc
\E
KB C D
td A B cx
,4
13,
L4
).5"
19
./-\ I
$n c
0"tt
21
22
r
.A
25
/.o
2l
D
XB C D
A BKD
FC D
XB C D
A BXD
A BXD
X B C. D
A BXD
A B{D
29
ABC
XBCD
30
ABKD
i i6
Appendix 19
Students' Answer Sheet of Post-Test of Control Group
Answer
sheet Posb-Test
Name
Roll
No
class/group
1
a?
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
,QHnrrtt CnNDRfr 0.
'
Od
:#p#*
Controt
Eo
A B CX
AXC D
AXC D
A XC D
XB C D
A BYD
A YC D
YBCD
8",
21
AIXC D
XB C D
Post-Test
Name
Roll No
: Nux,tt
:
l-aqrtmq.
24.
6o
.y XB c D
-y AX C D
.(
A B/K
A BA
D
D
XB C D
A BAD
AX C D
XB C D
I
l0
A BAD
\B
b, l8
BC
ABC
A XC
BCD
BCD
A Bq
ABXD
BC
AB
129
Appendix 20
RENCANA PELAKSANAAN PEMBELAJARAN (RPP) I
Nama Sekolah
SMP 1 TIRTO
Mata Pelajaran
Bahasa Inggris
Kelas/Semester
VIII/1
Alokasi Waktu
2 x 40 menit ( 1x pertemuan )
Topik Pembelajaran
Descriptive text
A. Standar Kompetensi
Membaca
5. Memahami makna teks tulis fungsional dan esei pendek sederhana berbentuk
descriptive dan recount yang berkaitan dengan lingkungan sekitar
B. Kompetensi Dasar
Membaca
5.1 Merespon makna dan langkah retorika dalam essei pendek sederhana secara
akurat, lancar, dan berterima untuk berinteraksi dengan lingkungan sekitar
dalam teks berbentuk descriptive dan recount.
130
esei
pendek
esei
pendek
sederhana bersahabat,
cinta
damai,
gemar
D. Tujuan Pembelajaran
Pada akhir pembelajaran siswa dapat:
a. Memahami esei pendek sederhana berbentuk teks Descriptive
b. Mengidentifikasi esei pendek sederhana berbentuk teks Descriptive
c. Merespon esei pendek sederhana berbentuk teks Descriptive
131
E. Materi Pokok
Descriptive text is kind of text that describe about something, for example
person, animal, and etc. this text focuses on the characteristic features of a
particular think.
The schematic structures of descriptive text are:
1) Identification
Identifies the phenomenon to be described
2) Description of feature
Describes the feature in order of importance:
a) Parts/things (physical appearances)
b) Qualities (degrees of beauty, excellence, or worth/value)
c) Other characteristics (prominent aspect that are unique).
The linguistic features of Descriptive text are:
1) Using simple present tense;
2) Focus on specific participants;
3) Using attributive and identifying processes;
4) Frequent use of epithets (adjective or adjective phrase) and classifier
in nominal groups;
5) Linking verbs;
Example of Descriptive text:
THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS
The Hawaiian Islands are located in the
middle of the Pacific Ocean, far away from any
Identification
132
Description
F. Metode Pembelajaran/Teknik:
Student-Teams Achievement Division
G. Strategi Pembelajaran
Tatap Muka
Terstruktur
Mandiri
teks Descriptive
mengetahui
mana
Descriptive
memahami
teks
Descriptive
Memberikan contoh esai
untuk
Membahas
yang
dalam
dihadapi
siswa
melakukan
tentang
bersama kelompoknya
teks Descriptive.
esai
kesulitan
siswa
sejauh
pendek
berbentuk
133
mandiri.
134
Elaborasi
Dalam kegiatan elaborasi guru:
Konfirmasi
Dalam kegiatan konfirmasi guru:
135
H.
Sumber/Bahan/Alat
Modul Bahasa Inggris kelas VIII. Utami Widiati, dll. Bahasa Inggris
Sekolah Menengah Pertama kelas VIII edisi 4. Halaman 62
Realia
Kamus
I. Penilaian
I. Indikator, Teknik, Bentuk, dan Contoh.
No
1.
Indikator
Teknik
Tes
sederhana
berbentuk
Lisan
teks Descriptive
Bentuk
Menganalisa
Contoh
teks What
Mengidentifikasi
pendek
structure
esei
and and
feature
linguistic
of
this
text?
sederhana
berbentuk
3.
the
linguistic feature)
2.
are
teks
Descriptive
Tes
Menjawab
Answer
sederhana
following
berbentuk
teks Descriptive
berdasarkan teks
question
the
by
choosing a, b, c,
or d based on the
text!
136
c. Singapore
b. A beautiful city
11t
:JI
4.
flor'?
a.
b.
IlI.
Gocd
c. I.ogical
Nice
d. Excellent
Pedoman Penilaian
1.
2.
Skor maksimal = 30
3.
Nilai siswa :
Skor siswa
Skor maksimal
100
Rubrik Penilaian
Uraian
Skor
Jawatran benar
Jau,aban saiah
Tidak menjawab
Mengetaliui
Peneliti
q ,0.
Gita tiarruyati
NlP I 9621242
NPM tA042qAq2t
198403 2010
138
Appendix 21
SILABUS PEMBELAJARAN
Sekolah
Kelas
Mata Pelajaran
Semester
: SMP 1 TIRTO
: VIII (Delapan)
: Bahasa Inggris
: 1 (satu)
Kompetensi
Dasar
5.1
Merespon
makna dan
langkah
retorika
dalam essei
pendek
sederhana
secara
akurat,
lancar, dan
Materi Pokok/
Pembelajaran
Descriptive
text is a kind
that describe a
particular
something,
place, thing,
animal, etc.
The schematic
structures of
Kegiatan
Pembelajaran
Indikator
Alokasi
Waktu
2 x 40
Menit
Sumber
Belajar
Modul Bahasa
Inggris kelas
VIII.
Utami
Widiati, dll.
Bahasa
Inggris
Sekolah
Menengah
Pertama kelas
VIII edisi 4.
Penilaian
Bentuk
Teknik
Instrumen
Tes
MenganaliLisan
sa teks
Descriptive
(generic
structure
and
linguistic
feature)
139
berterima
untuk
berinteraksi
dengan
lingkungan
sekitar
dalam teks
berbentuk
descriptive
dan
recount.
1)
2)
1)
2)
3)
4)
descriptive text
are:
Identification
Description of
feature
The linguistic
features of
Descriptive
text are:
Using simple
present tense;
Focus on
specific
participant
Using
attributive and
identifying
processes;
Frequent use
of epithets
(adjective or
adjective
phrase) and
Memberikan
contoh
esai
pendek
berbentuk teks
Descriptive
Membuat grup
terdiri dari 4
orang
Mendiskusikan
tentang
worksheet esai
pendek
berbentuk teks
Descriptive
dengan
kelompok
belajarnya
Guru bersama
siswa
membahas dan
mengoreksi
worksheet yang
telah dikerjakan
sederhana
berbentuk
teks
Descriptive
Memahami
esei pendek
sederhana
berbentuk
teks
Descriptive
Page 62
Realia
Kamus
Tes
Tertulis
Menjawab
pertanyaan
berdasarkan
teks
st
-iC>
CI
ai
Dl
-: $_. il j
2^El
Z
:a)v;r
J.)ut
C)o.
=t
\ \=-'/
-i
.-l
2
n
z,
t/
-(J
::a
=d)
\)
/t
LU
;iE
-qJri-
X=L='. ---.;aOaE
3,iaE9=
a
a,
c.l
(t
-o
h
-
t:
ali
c.io
C'l
C'l
N
'\o
a''i\
141
Appendix 22
RENCANA PELAKSANAAN PEMBELAJARAN (RPP) II
(K.D. 5.1)
Sekolah
SMP 1 Tirto
Mata Pelajaran
Bahasa Inggris
Kelas / Semester
VIII / 1
Tahun Pelajaran
2013/2014
Skill
Reading
Waktu
2 X 40 menit (1 x pertemuan)
Standar Kompetensi
Membaca (Reading)
5.
Kompetensi Dasar
5.1. Merespon makna dan langkah retorika dalam essei pendek sederhana
secara akurat, lancar, dan berterima untuk berinteraksi dengan lingkungan
sekitar dalam teks berbentuk descriptive dan recount.
Indikator
Dengan nilai jujur, rasa ingin tahu, mandiri, kerja keras, dan senang
membaca dapat
informasi tersurat/tersirat, makna kata/frase, rujukan kata, dan pokok pikiran dari
teks yang berbentuk descriptive.
142
Tujuan Pembelajaran
Menemukan
tujuan
komunikatif
teks,
gambaran
umum,
informasi
tersurat/tersirat, makna kata/frase, rujukan kata, dan pokok pikiran dari teks yang
berbentuk descriptive dengan mandiri, kerja keras, dan jujur.
Materi Pembelajaran
Descriptive text is kind of text that describe about a particular something,
for example person, animal, and etc. this text focuses on the characteristic features
of a particular think.
The schematic structures of descriptive text are:
1) Identification
Identifies the phenomenon to be described
2) Description of feature
Describes the feature in order of importance:
a) Parts/things (physical appearances)
b) Qualities (degrees of beauty, excellence, or worth/value)
c) Other characteristics (prominent aspect that are unique).
The linguistic features of Descriptive text are:
1) Using simple present tense;
2) Focus on specific participants;
3) Using attributive and identifying processes;
4) Linking verbs;
Example of Descriptive text:
THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS
The Hawaiian Islands are located in
the middle of the Pacific Ocean, far away
Identification
143
Description
Metode/Teknik Pembelajaran
-
Ceramah
Penugasan
KEGIATAN
WAKTU
Siswa menjawab salam guru denganbersahabat dan 10 Menit
komunikatif.
Siswa merespon pertanyaan guru tentang kehadiran
siswa denganbersahabat dan komunikatif.
Siswa merespon pertanyaan-pertanyaan apersepsi guru
dengan kreatif, mandiri, jujur, dan rasa ingin tahu.
Siswa memperhatikan penjelasan guru tentang tujuan
pembelajaran yang hendak dicapai dengan rasa ingin
tahu.
WAKTU
60 Menit
144
WAKTU
10 Menit
Sumber
a.
Kamus
Penilaian
-
1A!
lL+)
Rubrik Penilaian
FORMAT TENILAIAN
NO
NAMA
NILAI
PROSES
TUGAS
2
J
J
5
KriterialPedoman Penilaian:
R*ntang skor penilaian adalah 10 * 100
Pekalongan,T Mei2014
Mengetahui
Peneliti
q{.
Gita Rianawati
NPM 1004290921
146
Appendix 23
SILABUS PEMBELAJARAN
Sekolah
: SMP N I Tirto
Kelas
: VIII
Mata Pelajaran
: B. Inggris
Standar Kompetensi : Membaca (Reading)
5.Memahami makna teks tulis fungsional dan essei pendek sederhana berbentuk descriptive dan
recount untuk berinteraksi dengan lingkungan sekitar.
No
Kompetensi
Dasar
5.1. Merespon
makna dan
langkah retorika
dalam essei
pendek sederhana
secara akurat,
lancar, dan
berterima untuk
berinteraksi
dengan
Materi
Pokok/
Pembelajaran
Teks tulis essei
pendek
sederhana
berbentuk teks
Descriptive
Kegiatan
Pembelajaran
Materi pokok
diajarkan
dengan tahapan
sbb:
I. Pendahuluan
II. Kegiatan
Inti
- Tahap
Eksplorasi
- Tahap
Indikator
Alokasi
Waktu
Sumber
Belajar
2 x 40
Menit
- Buku
Bahasa
Inggris
untuk
kelas
VIII
yang
relevan
- Kamus
Penilaian
Bentuk
Teknik Instrume
n
- Tes
lisan
Menganali
sa teks
- Tes
Descriptitulis
ve (generic
structure
and
linguistic
feature)
- Tes essai
r*
sr
._l
u6.
=
(-'l
..9\}lqr
-S-SE\-J.El
'.=l
dt
d\
Ei
tz
58oi
(B
-v
o
E
L!
-d o
;Htid
c'r
9at
$'li#Y
o0.3
.!4*
F
S
E+ S,FS
e YP
=; agt
P
=
rEa:^:
E+
O.
IE
E^(,
131
O.l
o
(c
(B
q)
j4
d
U
-'
hETS
!
.E3
v
E3*
O
c\
5
c.l
.,,ls
.-..t1
El ec\
-=l
c.)
00
:l
Jdt
ctl
cl
0-
^i
als
cl
<l
148
Appendix 24
ASSIGNING STUDENTS TO TEAMS
GROUP 1
GROUP 2
GROUP 3
GROUP 4
GROUP 5
GROUP 6
GROUP 7
GROUP 8
Akmal Bahtiar
Taufan Arifian
Anggita Anindia P.
Faroh Ainaya Ansirni
Intan Syahra Febiantika
Khusnul Khotimah
Arif Mustofa
M. Erfandi
Anggreini Wulandari
Sanada Ulfi K.
Eko Hadi Wibowo
M. Abdul Rozak
Teguh Imam S.
Azza Zulfatin
M. Mahfudz
Puja Adi Saputra
Baskoro Dwiyanto
Isnan Rizkianto
Nuzul
Rina Anita
Abdul Fattah
M. Maulana Majid
Murni Yuliana
Suciati
M. Hasyim Muzadi
Teguh Budi Utomo
Choerul Mufid
Mellyati Agustina
Adelia Ayu Ningrum
Lutfian Hadiarso
M. Dwi Andrian Maulana
Muslimin
Shinta Amelia Fitri
149
Appendix 25
WORKSHEET
Descriptive text is kind of text that describe about something, for example
person, animal, etc.
The schematic structures of descriptive text are:
a. Identification
Identifies the phenomenon to be described
b. Description of feature
Describes the feature in order of importance:
a. Parts/things (physical appearances)
b. Qualities (degrees of beauty, excellence, or worth/value)
c. Other characteristics (prominent aspect that are unique).
The linguistic features of Descriptive text are:
1) Using simple present tense; S+V1+e/es+O/K
2) Focus on specific participants;
3) Linking verbs;
150
goods are duty free. Singapores restaurants sell Chinese, Indian, Malay and
European food, and the prices are quite reasonable.
1. What is the purpose of the text?
c. To describe Singapore
d. To entertain the reader about Singapore
e. To tell about Singapore
f. To show about Singapore
2. What is identification of the text?
a. The 1st sentence of the 2nd paragraph
b. The last sentence of the 2nd paragraph
c. The 1st sentence of the 1st paragraph
d. The last sentence of the 1st paragraph
3. Its a beautiful city with lots of parks and open spaces (Line 1)
It refers to
a. An island city
c. Singapore
b. A beautiful city
c. Logical
b. Nice
d. Excellent
151
Appendix 26
QUIZ SCORE SHEET (STAD)
Students
Abdul Fattah
Adelia Ayu Ningrum
Akmal Bahtiar
Anggita Anindia
Anggreini Wulandari
Arief Mustofa
Azza Zulfatin
Baskoro Dwiyanto
Choerul Mufid
Eko Hadi Wibowo
Farah Ainaya Ansirni
Intan Syahra Febiantika
Isnan Rizkianto
Khusnul Khotimah
Lutfian Hadiarso
M. Abdul Rozak
M. Dwi Andriyan
M. Maulana Majid
Mellyati Agustina
M. Mahfud L.
M. Erfandi
M. Hasyim Muzadi
Murni Yuliana
Muslimin
Nuzul
Puja Adi Saputra
Rina Anita
Sanada Ulfi Khikmah
Shinta Amelia Fitri
Suciati
Taufan Arifian
Teguh Budi Utomo
Teguh Imam S.
Base
Score
56
66
66
70
60
66
70
53
70
66
56
53
66
43
86
66
66
76
53
66
60
66
53
66
60
63
60
63
43
63
60
66
56
Date:
Quiz :
Quiz
Improvement
score
Points
66
20
100
30
50
10
50
5
83
30
66
20
66
10
66
30
66
5
83
30
50
10
66
30
66
20
66
30
100
30
83
30
100
30
66
10
66
30
66
20
66
10
66
20
66
30
100
30
66
10
66
10
66
10
83
30
100
30
66
10
50
10
66
20
66
20
152
Appendix 27
TEAM SUMMARY SHEET
Team
Name
Team Members
Score
Akmal Bahtiar
Taufan Arifian
Anggita Anindia P.
Faroh Ainaya A.
Intan Syahra F.
Khusnul Khotimah
Arif Mustofa
M. Erfandi
Anggreini W.
Sanada Ulfi K.
Eko Hadi Wibowo
M. Abdul Rozak
Teguh Imam S.
Azza Zulfatin
M. Mahfudz
Puja Adi Saputra
Baskoro Dwiyanto
Isnan Rizkianto
Nuzul
Rina Anita
Abdul Fattah
M. Maulana Majid
Murni Yuliana
Suciati
M. Hasyim Muzadi
Teguh Budi Utomo
Choerul Mufid
Mellyati Agustina
Adelia Ayu N.
Lutfian Hadiarso
M. Dwi Andrian M.
Muslimin
Shinta Amelia Fitri
10
10
5
10
30
30
20
10
30
30
30
30
10
10
20
10
30
20
10
10
20
10
30
10
20
20
5
30
30
30
30
30
30
Team
Total
Score
35
Team
Average
Team
Awards
8.75
Good
Team
90
22.5
Great
Team
120
40
Super
Team
50
12.5
Good
Team
70
17.5
Great
Team
70
17.5
Great
Team
75
18.75
Great
Team
150
30
Super
Team
153
Appendix 28
OBSERVATION SCHEME
THE RESULT OF OBSERVATION
Group
Name of Students
Akmal Bahtiar
Taufan Arifian
Anggita Anindia P.
Faroh Ainaya Ansirni
Intan Syahra Febiantika
Khusnul Khotimah
Arif Mustofa
M. Erfandi
Anggreini Wulandari
Sanada Ulfi K.
Eko Hadi Wibowo
M. Abdul Rozak
Teguh Imam S.
Azza Zulfatin
M. Mahfudz
Puja Adi Saputra
Baskoro Dwiyanto
Isnan Rizkianto
Nuzul
Rina Anita
Abdul Fattah
M. Maulana Majid
Murni Yuliana
Suciati
M. Hasyim Muzadi
Teguh Budi Utomo
Choerul Mufid
Mellyati Agustina
Adelia Ayu Ningrum
Lutfian Hadiarso
M. Dwi Andrian Maulana
Muslimin
Shinta Amelia Fitri
Total
Maximum Score
Average Score
Percentage
Aspects of Observed
A
B
C
D
4
2
3
3
4
2
2
3
3
3
3
2
4
3
4
3
4
4
3
2
4
3
4
4
4
3
3
3
4
2
3
2
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
2
4
4
3
3
3
3
4
3
4
3
2
3
4
4
4
3
4
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
3
4
4
3
3
4
3
4
2
4
3
4
3
4
4
4
3
3
3
4
3
4
4
4
3
4
4
2
3
4
4
2
3
4
4
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
3
3
4
4
3
3
129 114 108
98
132 132 132 132
3.90 3.45 3.27 2.96
97% 86% 81% 74%
Total
12
11
11
14
13
15
13
11
15
16
13
14
13
12
15
13
13
13
16
13
14
13
14
15
13
15
13
13
14
16
15
14
14
449
528
13.60
85%
154
155
Score 2:
= Bad learning
156
Appendix 29
INTERVIEW GUIDELINE
a. English Teacher
1) How is the students reading ability?
2) How many students do they get reading lesson, in a week?
3) Do you find some difficulties in teaching reading comprehension so far?
How is the solution?
4) Have you ever heard about Student Teams-Achievement Division method
before?
5) What do you think about Student Teams-Achievement Division method?
b. Students
1) Apakah kamu suka pelajaran Reading?
2) Apa pendapatmu tentang pelajaran Reading dengan menggunakan metode
Student Teams-Achievement Division?
3) Apakah kamu suka dengan metode Student Teams-Achievement Division?
Berikan alasanmu?
4) Apakah kamu senang ketika diajar menggunakan metode Student TeamsAchievement Division? Berikan alasanmu?
5) Apakah ada peningkatan dalam kemampuan membacamu setelah diajar
dengan menggunakan metode Student Teams-Achievement Division?
157
Researcher :
Mrs. Nani :
Yes, I have heard it, but I do not know the complete detail about
STAD.
158
: 15
1. Apakah kamu suka pelajaran Reading? Berikan alasanmu?
Iya, suka karena bisa menambah ilmu pengetahuan kita, dan juga bisa
menambah kosakata.
2. Apa pendapatmu tentang pelajaran Reading dengan menggunakan metode
Student Teams-Achievement Division?
Cukup menyenangkan karena bisa saling bertukar pikir membahas
pelajaran bersama.
3. Apakah kamu suka dengan metode Student Teams-Achievement Division?
Berikan alasanmu?
Saya suka karena kita bisa belajar bersama membahas pelajaran yang
diberikan guru.
4. Apakah kamu senang ketika diajar menggunakan metode Student TeamsAchievement Division? Berikan alasanmu?
Saya senang diajar dengan STAD, karena berbeda dengan biasanya, jadi
tidak membosankan.
5. Apakah ada peningkatan dalam kemampuan membacamu setelah diajar
dengan menggunakan metode Student Teams-Achievement Division?
Iya, ada peningkatan sedikit. Nilai saya lebih baik karena sudah dilatih
beberapa kali dengan diskusi kelompok, tes individu, dll.
Name : M. Mahfud L.
No
: 20
1. Apakah kamu suka pelajaran Reading? Berikan alasanmu?
Iya, suka. Pelajaran Reading itu susah-susah gampang karena jawaban dari
pertanyaan sudah ada di teks.
159
: 23
1. Apakah kamu suka pelajaran Reading? Berikan alasanmu?
Iya, lumayan suka.
2. Apa pendapatmu tentang pelajaran Reading dengan menggunakan metode
Student Teams-Achievement Division?
STAD itu cukup menyenangkan
3. Apakah kamu suka dengan metode Student Teams-Achievement Division?
Berikan alasanmu?
Iya, suka karena saya suka belajar dengan kelompok.
4. Apakah kamu senang ketika diajar menggunakan metode Student TeamsAchievement Division? Berikan alasanmu?
Saya senang diajar dengan STAD karena bisa menambah pengetahuan
tentang teks Descriptive.
160
: 14
1. Apakah kamu suka pelajaran Reading? Berikan alasanmu?
Iya suka karena bisa berdiskusi mengerjakan bersama teman.
2. Apa pendapatmu tentang pelajaran Reading dengan menggunakan metode
Student Teams-Achievement Division?
Cukup menyenangkan karena itu tidak membosankan biasanya hanya
mendengarkan penjelasan dari guru didepan kelas.
3. Apakah kamu suka dengan metode Student Teams-Achievement Division?
Berikan alasanmu?
Saya suka karena bisa termotivasi dengan teman yang sudah memahami
pelajaran dari guru terlebih dahulu.
4. Apakah kamu senang ketika diajar menggunakan metode Student TeamsAchievement Division? Berikan alasanmu?
Saya senang diajar dengan STAD karena saya bisa belajar bersama jadi
tidak berpikir sendiri seperti biasa.
5. Apakah ada peningkatan dalam kemampuan membacamu setelah diajar
dengan menggunakan metode Student Teams-Achievement Division?
Iya, ada peningkatan.
161
Appendix 30
1{-
ir_1L
Appendix 3l
TABIf.
OF DISTRIBUTION
O['T.TABLE
f Table
cum. prob
one-tail
t.so
t.ao
t .ts
0.50
1.00
0.25
0.50
0.20
0.40
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
.oo0
0.816
0.765
0.741
0.727
0,718
0.711
.376
1.061
0.978
0.941
0.920
0.906
0.896
;.ffi ;.;;
11
12
t.so
f .os
.ss
0.10
0.20
0.05 0.025
0.10
0.05
.963
1.386
1.250
1.190
1.156
.134
1.119
3.078
1.886
1.638
1.533
.476
I .440
1.415
6.314
2.920
2.353
2.132
2.015
.943
1.895
12.71
4.303
3.182
2.776
2.571
2.447
2.36s
t -sru
t.sgs
f.sgss
0.005
0.001
o.ooo5l
0.01
0.002
0.001
t.sg
t.gru
0.15
0.30
0.01
0.02
.82
6.965
4.541
3.747
3.365
3'143
2 998
31
'1
.E
1.833 2.262
1.796
1.782
1.771
1.761
.753
1.746
1.740
.734
1.729
1.725
1.721
1.717
1.714
1.711
1.708
2.681
2.650
2.624
2.602
2.583
2.567
2.552
2-539
2.528
2.518
2.508
2.500
2.492
2.485
3.055
3.012
2.977
2.947
2.921
2.898
2.878
2-861
2.845
2.831
2.819
2.807
2797
2.787
3.930 4.318
3.852 4.221
3.787 4j40
3.733 4.073
3.686 4 015
3.646 3.965
3.610 3-922
3.579 3.883
3.s52 3 850
3.527 3.819
3.505 3.792
3.485 3.768
3.467 3.745
3.450 3.725
.684
1.671
2.021
2.000
2.704
1.990
2.660
2.639
3.307
3.232
3.195
3.551
1.664
1660
1.984
1.962
2.423
2.390
2.374
2.364
2.330
2.626
3.174
3.390
2.581
3.098
4.437
.::26
,,
::ti
::.:.
,,.
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.681
0.851
0.679
0.678
0.677
0.675
0.848
0.846
0.845
0.842
1.050
1.045
1.043
1.042
1.037
1.303
1.296
1.292
1.290
1.282
1.646
.:aa:a::1
:::0i6tr-l.4.,
0%
50%
.ytlu
1.036
60%
70%
80% 90%
95%
Confidence Level
2.3;zo',. z.szo
98%
99%
ii1-:]:::=
lEr09o
99
3.460
3.416
3.300
: si2st
99.9%
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
Appendix 33
ABOUT THE WRITER
Name
: Gita Rianawati
NPM
: 100429921
Address
Telephone
: +6285741941277
: grianawati@gmail.com
Religion
: Islam
2010
2006
2003