Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Abstract
A set-type fermented milk manufactured from goats milk was developed. Optimal curd tension was achieved by supplementation
of milk with skim milk powder and whey protein concentrate (WPC). Milk was fermented employing a commercial probiotic starter
culture (ABT-2), which contained Streptococcus thermophilus ST-20Y, Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5, and Bifidobacterium BB-12.
Supplementation of milk with 3% WPC reduced fermentation time by 2 h due to the increase in viable counts of S. thermophilus and
Bifidobacterium by 0.3 and 0.7 log units, respectively. Addition of WPC increased the protein content (1%) as well as potassium and
magnesium content (0.3 and 0.02 g kg 1, respectively). Increase of the protein content led to an increase in the apparent viscosity and
gel rmness of the product, and at the same time whey syneresis was reduced. As a consequence, the product received a high score
for appearance, taste, aroma, texture and overall acceptance.
r 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Whey protein concentrate; Bifidobacterium; Fermented goats milk; Rheological properties
1. Introduction
During recent years, an increasing interest has
developed in foods that contribute to a positive effect
on health beyond their nutritional value. Among these
functional foods, much attention has been focused on
probiotic products. Probiotic foods contain microorganisms or components of microbial cells that have a
benecial effect on the health and well-being of the
consumer host (Salminen, Ouwehand, Benno, & Lee,
1999). Viability of probiotic bacteria to high counts (at
least 107 cfug 1 or mL 1 of product) is recognized as an
important requirement during manufacturing and marketing of probiotic foods in order to achieve the claimed
health benets.
Goats milk has been described as having a higher
digestibility and lower allergenic properties than cows
milk. In addition, goats milk has been attributed with
certain therapeutic values in human nutrition (Spuergin
et al., 1997; Alferez et al., 2001; Barrionuevo, Alferez,
Lopez-Aliaga, Sanz-Sampelayo, & Campos, 2002).
However, the manufacture of fermented goats milk
ARTICLE IN PRESS
828
ARTICLE IN PRESS
A.B. Mart!n-Diana et al. / International Dairy Journal 13 (2003) 827833
6.5
6.0
pH
Protein was determined by applying a nitrogen-toprotein conversion factor of 6.38. Non-protein nitrogen
(NPN) was determined in the 12% trichloroacetic acid
(TCA)-soluble fraction of the samples and analysed in
the LECO analyser after removal of TCA. Mineral
content (Ca, Na, K, Mg, Mn, Zn, Fe, and Cu) was
determined following the method described by De la
Fuente, Fontecha and Juarez (1996). The chloride
concentration was determined using the Sigma diagnostics chloride reagent (Sigma chemical Co., St. Louis,
USA) and following the manufacturers instructions.
The lactose content was determined using the lactose/
d-galactose test for food analysis (Roche, Mannheim,
Germany). Total solids were determined by drying the
samples at 10272 C to constant weight for gravimetric
determination. Ash content was determined by ignition
of solid materials at 550 C for 24 h in an electric mufe
furnace (Guzma! n-Gonza! lez, Morais, Ramos, & Amigo,
1999). All the analyses were performed in triplicate.
829
5.5
5.0
4.5
4.0
The results of the two trials were studied using oneway analysis of variance to determine signicant
differences (Po0.05) by the addition of WPC to
fermented milk samples in bacterial counts, composition, pH, rheological properties and sensory scores by
10
12
Time (h)
ARTICLE IN PRESS
A.B. Mart!n-Diana et al. / International Dairy Journal 13 (2003) 827833
830
Table 1
Content (%, meana 7SD) in total solids, ash, protein, NPN and lactose in the fermented milk samples manufactured from cows milk (A), goats
milk (B) and goats milk supplemented with 3% WPC (C) and 5% WPC (D)
Fermented milk
Total solids
Ash
A
B
C
D
14.270.86
14.370.04a
16.770.81ab
17.872.07b
a
Protein
a
NPN
a
0.8770.08
0.8670.01a
1.2070.21ab
1.3970.25b
Lactose
a
3.7170.01
3.9570.06a
5.0170.41b
5.3170.13b
2.1870.21b
1.1970.30a
1.2870.22a
1.2270.31a
0.1870.03
0.1870.03a
0.5870.10b
0.6670.05b
Means are average from two independent trials. Different letters indicate signicant differences (Po0.05) between batches.
Table 2
Mineral composition (g kg 1; meana7SD) of the fermented milk samples manufactured from cows milk (A), goats milk (B) and goats milk
supplemented with 3% WPC (C) and 5% WPC (D)
Fermented milk
A
B
C
D
Chlorides
2.970.01
3.170.05
3.170.05
3.070.04
Ca
Na
a
1.0170.06
1.1170.06ab
1.1870.06b
1.1970.07b
K
a
0.5370.01
0.6270.02b
0.6570.04b
0.7070.03c
Mg
a
1.5070.04
1.5370.21a
1.8470.10b
1.9270.20b
0.09670.002
0.10670.001b
0.12770.006c
0.13570.007d
Cu
Fe
Zn
o0.002
o0.002
o0.002
o0.002
o0.002
o0.002
o0.002
o0.002
0.004670.0001
0.004570.0001
0.004870.0009
0.004670.0006
Means are average from two independent trials. Different letters indicate signicant differences (Po0.05) between batches.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
A.B. Mart!n-Diana et al. / International Dairy Journal 13 (2003) 827833
831
Table 3
Viability (cfu g, 1 meana 7SD) of Streptococcus thermophilus ST-20Y, Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5, and Bifidobacterium BB-12 in the fermented
milk samples manufactured from cows milk (A), goats milk (B) and goats milk supplemented with 3% WPC (C) and 5% WPC (D) after the
fermentation process and 21 days of storage at 4 C
Fermented milk
1 day
21 days
ab
6.670.7
5.272.9a
9.971.7bc
11.274.0c
a
1 day
a
7.171.4
7.271.4a
8.771.4a
8.972.7a
Bifidobacterium BB-12
(cfu g 17SD) 106
21 days
1 day
o10
o106
o106
o106
ab
3.270.7
3.771.0b
3.471.0b
1.970.7a
21 days
a
2.271.4a
2.770.5a
13.572.7b
19.474.8c
4.271.3
3.670.4a
16.674.8b
44.0711.7c
Means are average from two independent trials. Different letters indicate signicant differences (Po0.05) between batches.
4800
Viscosity (cP)
A
B
C
D
Lactobacillus acidophilus
(cfu g 17SD) 107
Streptococcus thermophilus
(cfu g 17SD) 108
3600
2400
1200
0
0
10
15
Time (h)
Table 4
Rheological properties (meana7SD): viscosity (cP), rmness (g) and
syneresis grade (g kg 1) of the fermented milk samples manufactured
from cows milk (A), goats milk (B) and goats milk supplemented
with 3% WPC (C) and 5% WPC (D)
Fermented milk
A
B
C
D
Viscosity
Firmness
ab
23257388
17867284a
30127300b
45457487c
Syneresis
a
11.770.68
6.1571.48a
25.270.98b
34.776.43c
570783bc
635744c
508776ab
430757a
a
Means are average from two independent trials. Different letters
indicate signicant differences (Po0.05) between batches.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
832
Table 5
Sensory analysis (meana 7SD) of the fermented milk samples manufactured from cows milk (A), goats milk (B) and goats milk supplemented with
3% WPC (C) and 5% WPC (D)
Fermented milk
A
B
C
D
Appearance
ab
7.571.4
6.572.2a
8.571.1b
8.371.3b
Aroma
Taste
b
8.371.1
6.472.0a
7.970.9b
7.870.9b
Texture
b
8.270.9
4.371.3a
7.871.3b
7.570.9b
Acceptability
b
8.070.9
5.271.2a
8.370.8b
7.970.7b
8.370.8b
4.771.4a
8.171.0b
7.970.9b
4. Conclusion
An acceptable fermented goats milk, when compared
with a set-style cows milk yoghurt, has been obtained
by supplementation of milk with 3% WPC. The main
advantages of WPC addition to goats milk are related
to the reduction of fermentation time, the nutritional
enrichment of the product in protein and minerals, the
increase in bidobacterial growth and viability, and the
development of suitable rheological properties for a setstyle fermented milk. Increase in bacterial population by
addition of 3% WPC did not adversely affect the
sensory acceptability of the product, which had a high
score for appearance, taste, aroma, texture and overall acceptance, nor did it cause acidication during
storage.
Acknowledgements
This research was nanced by Project AGL20000727-C03-02. We thank Fermo SA and Borculo Domo
Ingredients for their kind supply of WPC and Vivinal
ARTICLE IN PRESS
A.B. Mart!n-Diana et al. / International Dairy Journal 13 (2003) 827833
References
Alferez, M. J., Barrionuevo, M., Lopez-Aliaga, I., Sanz-Sampelayo,
M. R., Lisbona, F., Robles, J. C., & Campos, M. S. (2001).
Digestive utilization of goat and cow milk fat in malabsorption
syndrome. Journal of Dairy Research, 68, 451461.
Barrionuevo, M., Alferez, M. J. M., Lopez-Aliaga, I., Sanz-Sampelayo, M. R., & Campos, M. S. (2002). Benecial effect of goat milk
on nutritive utilization of iron and copper in malabsorption
syndrome. Journal of Dairy Science, 85, 657664.
Bozanic, R., & Tratnik, L. (2001). Quality of cows and goats
fermented bido milk during storage. Food Technology and
Biotechnology, 39, 109114.
Britten, M., & Giroux, H. J. (2001). Acid-induced gelation of whey
protein polymers: Effects of pH and calcium concentration during
polymerization. Food Hydrocolloids, 15, 609617.
Dave, R. I., & Shah, N. P. (1998). Ingredient supplementation effects
on viability of probiotic bacteria in yogurt. Journal of Dairy
Science, 81, 28042816.
De la Fuente, M. A., Fontecha, J., & Juarez, M. (1996). Partition of
main and trace minerals in milk: Effect of ultracentrifugation,
rennet coagulation and dialysis on soluble phase separation.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 44, 19821992.
De la Fuente, M. A., Olano, A., & Ju!arez, M. (1997). Distribution of
calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, zinc, manganese, copper and
iron between the soluble and colloidal phases of ewes and goats
milk. Lait, 77, 515520.
Duboc, P., & Mollet, B. (2001). Applications of exopolysaccharides in
the dairy industry. International Dairy Journal, 11, 759768.
Flynn, A., & Cashman, K. (1997). Nutritional aspects of minerals in
bovine and human milks. In P. F. Fox (Ed.), Advances in dairy
chemistry. Lactose, water, salts and vitamins, Vol. 3. (pp. 257302).
London: Chapman & Hall.
Gastaldi, E., Lagaude, A., & Tarodo de la Fuente, B. (1996). Micellar
transition state in casein between pH 5.5 and 5.0. Journal of Food
Science, 61, 5968.
Gopal, P. K., Sullivan, P. A., & Smart, J. B. (2001). Utilisation of
galacto-oligosaccharides as selective substrates for growth by lactic
acid bacteria including Bifidobacterium lactis DR10 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus DR20. International Dairy Journal, 11, 1925.
Guzm!an-Gonz!alez, M., Morais, F., Ramos, M., & Amigo, L. (1999).
Inuence of skimmed milk concentrate replacement by dry dairy
products in a low fat set-type yoghurt model system. I: Use of whey
protein concentrates, milk protein concentrates and skimmed
milk powder. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 79,
11171122.
Hess, S. J., Roberts, R. F., & Ziegler, G. R. (1997). Rheological
properties of nonfat yogurt stabilized using Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus producing exopolysaccharide or using
commercial stabilizer systems. Journal of Dairy Science, 80,
252263.
Isolauri, E., Arvola, T., Sutas, Y., Moilanen, E., & Salminen, S. (2000).
Probiotics in the management of atopic eczema. Clinical and
Experimental Allergy, 30, 16041610.
Kurmann, J. A. (1986). Yogurt made from ewes and goats milk.
Bulletin of the International Dairy Federation, 202, 153166.
833