Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ByRoll No.
Name
001
018
019
020
025
Aakash Hoskoti
Arun Karchakatti
Ashvin Hudedagaddi
Ashwin Kulkarni
Darshan Pawar
U.S.N.
2BV13ME001
2BV13ME018
2BV13ME019
2BV13ME020
2BV13ME025
I. INTRODUCTION
Leaf springs are widely used in automobile and in railway. The leaf spring should
absorb the vertical vibrations and impacts due to road irregularities by means of
variations in the spring deflection so that the potential energy is stored in spring as
strain energy and then released slowly so increasing the energy storage capabilities
of a leaf spring and ensures a more compliant suspension system. Leaf springs are
probably one of the oldest forms of spring-type suspension systems, having been in
use since medieval times. Until recently, leaf springs were a common rear
suspension component of most automobiles. The introduction of light-weight
front-wheel drive vehicles has basically made the use of leaf springs unnecessary,
and automobile manufacturers are now using coil springs for both front and rear
suspension systems. Leaf springs are now generally used only for heavier
commercial-type vehicles such as trucks, vans, trailers, and railroad cars.
There are two basic types of leaf springs:
Mono-leaf
Multi-leaf.
Multi-leaf:
Chrome-Vanadium
alloy
Steel(0.5% C )
Material
C40
Modulus of
Elasticity
MN/m2
0.206 106
Ultimate strength
MN/m2
950
Allowable Stress
MN/m2
550
1250
Modulus of
Elasticity
MN/m2
0.220 106
Ultimate strength
MN/m2
540
Allowable Stress
MN/m2
328
770
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
10.
Design parameter
Value
1610
0
10
0.206 106
550
50.8
9000
Base width(mm)
Band length (lbmm)
4920
60
By eqillibrium equations
Rf + Rr = 88920 N ------------------------ (a)
Taking moments about point O
Rb 4920 = 2360 88920
Rb = 42350.48 N
From eqn (a) we get
Rf = 88920 42350.48 = 45939.52 N
Therefore the design is based on front axle since it is heavily loaded.
Hence F =
Length L=
45939.56
2
2
2
= 22969.76 N
161060
2
= 775mm.
3
2
bh2 =
322969.76775
10550
63
y = (2)3
bh3 =
622969.767753
50.80207103 20
= 305034.49------------------------(c)
h = 3(9709.94)/9 = 10.25mm
eqn (c)
h = 4(305034.49)/9 = 13.56mm
3
3
22969.767753
207103 1012614
= 149.39mm
effective length
1
1610
9
2nd leaf =
1610
3rd leaf =
1610
4th leaf =
9
1610
9
+ ineffective length
+ 60 = 238.88mm
2 + 60 = 417.76mm
3 + 60 = 596.64mm
4 + 60 = 775.52mm
5th leaf =
1610
6th leaf =
1610
7th leaf =
1610
8th leaf =
1610
9th leaf =
1610
5 + 60 = 954.4mm
5 + 60 = 1133.28mm
5 + 60 = 1312.26mm
5 + 60 = 1491.04mm
5 + 60 = 1669.92mm
Pin design
Since there is clearance between plate and eye
L2=L+4 = 126+4=130mm
We know that M=
FL2
8
22969.76130
8
= 373258.6 N-mm.
Where Z =
d3
32
373258.632
d3
d=28.51mm
Standard d=30mm
Therefore length of the master leaf = 2L + 2 (d+h) = 1610 + 276.46 = 1886.46mm
Conclusion:
Sl
no
1.
2.
Parameter
Thickness of
leaves
Width of the
leaves
Calculated value
mm
14
Actual value
mm
15
Error %
126
130
3.07
3.28
3.
Length of
master leaf
188.6
195
4.
Diameter of
the pin
28.6
35
6.67
In this work, we designed the leaf spring for Tata Marco polo 912 using analytical
approach. We determined different parameters of the leaf spring like thickness,
length using the analytical formulae. The values obtained by above approach
revealed that the closeness of the values were differing by 6.6% for
thickness(height), 3.07% for the width and also the length of each spring is
determined, the closeness of values are obtained by comparing the values with the
actual values.