Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
A CRITICAL REVIEW:
Introduction
The history of Swahili language and its speakers has long been controversial with number of
competing views on what is the true origin of Swahili and Swahili speakers. Some scholars
hold that Swahili language originates from Arabic language; thus, Swahilis are therefore
believed to be descendants of Arabs and Muslims who speak Swahili. This view has a slight
support however, as it only focuses on the amount of Arabic vocabulary in Swahili language.
More influential is the view that Swahili is Bantu language as explained by a number of
scholars (Massamba, 2002; Chiraghdin and Mnyapala; 1977; Wald, 1987; Whiteley, 1969;
The view that Swahili is a Pidgin or Creole is mainly pegged on evidence that Arabs and
Africans formed a new community from which emerged a new form of language: Swahili.
Yet, this view appears spurious as it lacks a living evidence of the first form or a written
The question of who are Swahilis has also been broadly discussed. Commonly, scholars
define Swahilis according to their ethnic groups, religion, names, geographical area and
This paper, hence, reviews various theories on the origin of Swahili language and Swahili
speakers. It further examines the issues of the identification of Swahili people and offers
more accurate criteria to defining and classifying Swahili people. It concludes by providing
directions for further studies on the history of Swahili language and Swahili speakers.
Because the existing views on whether Swahili is Bantu, Arabic, Creole or Pidgin, lack
compelling evidence, further studies are indispensable to determine the exact origins of
Swahili. This is necessitated by the fact that there are limited views which provide authentic
‘’The Swahili community developed as a people group as Arab and Persian traders
established business contacts and married local women on the East African coast. This was
probably around AD 700 though some scholars think there were Arab settlements before
the advent of Islam.’’
Jenkins views that the Swahili community developed from the intermingling between Arab,
Persians, and African tribes living in the coast before Islam implies that Swahili was not
originally affiliated with Islam as claimed by some prior literatures. On the other hand, Al
According to the writings of this author (the Greek author) in his book, The Periplus of Erynthrean Sea,
those Arabs had made their settlements in East Africa for centuries before his visit, and had already mixed
their blood with the local population.
community might have originated. Both Jenkins and Al Barwani consent that Swahili
emerged on the East African coast as the result of long term contact between Arabs,
Persians, and the Africans who lived there. However, both disregarded to mentioning
whether Swahili language was already spoken before or after the arrival of Arabs on the East
Africa coast: a possible root of controversy in the study of history of the Swahili language
and Swahili speakers. Though little is said, and with doubtful evidence about whether Swahili
was already spoken before the coming of Arabs, it is palpable that the indigenous African
population settled on the East African coast spoke a form of language closely related or
almost similar to the form of Swahili spoken in the East African coast and the vicinity.
Afterwards, upon the arrival of Persian tribes on the East African coast, the typical form of
Swahili as spoken today in the East African coast developed. In anycase, although it is widely
accepted that Swahili developed from the contact between Arabs, Persians, and Africans;
To the present, the general impressions of Swahili people are based on factors such as ethnic
and/or religious grounds. To be more precise and detailed, the factor such as geographical
area as first stated by Stigand is incorporated. This general view point is also supported by
the Swahilis are predominantly Arab descendents who mixed with African tribes of the
coast. However, this classification alienates those who are non-Arab descendents from being
Swahilis: which is unfair to hold such a standpoint. Second, Stigand generalizes all who speak
speakers are French people; the same applies to other languages coinciding with their
Other sources define Swahilis as Muslim people of the East Africa coast who speak Swahili.
This view is outright illusory because it overlooks the large numbers of non Muslim Swahili
native speakers living in the East Africa coast. This view relates the arrival of Arabs and
Persians in East Africa, Islam and the emergence of Swahili language and generalizes that all
Arabs that came to East Africa were Muslims: a flaccid claim with superficial and obscuring
evidence.
Eastman’s study (1971) of Swahili people is more comprehensive, and seemingly accurate
but a little flimsy and more of complicating the issue than clarifying it substantially.
Classifying Swahili people according to five main criteria: ethnic and religious grounds,
names, geographical area, and educational grounds, Eastman derived the following
Muslim + + + + - - - - 1
Coastal origin + + - - 2
Muslim name + + - - 3
Christian + - + - 4
name
Koran school + - + - 5
NB: Number 1-8 were not in the original distinctive feature matrix of the author.
2. Mwarabu (Arab)
4. Mswahili (Swahili)
study was conducted on the heydays of the post colonial era when people could be proudly
identify others using criteria such as race or ethnicity. In the contemporary Swahili
communities, people do not rely on the use of these criteria to identify people as Swahilis.
Second, the population used in the data collection was inadequate in their knowledge of
Swahilis .Since Swahili is not an ethnic or religious language, those criteria were simply
negligible factors of identifying ones language identity. However, these criteria can be
somewhat useful to understanding Swahilis. In my own point of view, the first Swahili might
have been both or either of the two; Arab descendant and/or African. Hence forth, it is
hypothesized that both Africans and Arabs came to the East African coast with their own
languages. Through long term intermingling and intermarriages, the first Swahili speaking
generation might have developed from there on. Thus, convincingly the first Swahili people
might be Arabs, Arab-Africans (half castes), or Africans as seen today amongst Swahili
classification of Swahili people: where number 1 (AA) refers to Arab tribes coming to 3
(East Africa coast); number 2 (BB) Bantu African tribes to East African coast. Where AA
refers to Arabs and Persians; AB denotes Arab African (half castes) and BB African tribes
consistently.
Together all AA, AB, and BB can be Swahilis despite their ethnic and religious grounds,
(3) (2)
AA
BB
AA AB BB
This genetic network notation shows that Swahili people can be Arabs, Arab African or
from any ethnic grounds including Africans, Muslim or non Muslims. They can also be from
East African coast, mainland or from the islands. But these do yet define a Swahilis as
Eastman argued. In its real sense Eastman studies discounted the concepts of inner
circle(IC), outer circle (OC) and expanding circle speakers (EC) coined by Kachru (1985) in
defining language speakers. In Swahili language these concepts are applicable. Hence, I have
come up with the diagram below illustrating Swahilis in inner, outer, and expanding circle as
follows:
PIC
OC
EC
As in other languages such as English, there are also inner circle speakers of Swahili. These
are defined into more sub groups; inner core (ICC), and periphery inner circle (PIC) Swahili
speakers. The Inner core Swahilis speak Swahili as their native, first language with at least
their parents (mother and father) being native speakers of Swahili. On the other hand,
Periphery inner circle speakers speak Swahili as their native, first language, though their
parents might have their own native languages apart from Swahili. Pursuant to this,
therefore, both inner core (ICC), and Periphery inner circle (PIC) speakers are defined as
Swahilis. On the contrary, outer circle speakers are non native speakers of Swahili who speak
Swahili as a second or a foreign language. These are non Swahilis (not Swahilis but Swahili
speakers) the same applies to the Swahili from the expanding circle (EC)
In summary, Swahilis are all Swahili speakers eligible for the features of inner core and
periphery inner circle despite their ethnic or religious backgrounds and other factors
mentioned and discussed before. In contrast, the Swahili speakers’ from the outer and the
expanding circles are non-native Swahili speakers who are Swahili speakers but not Swahilis.
The origin of Swahili language and Swahilis debate is yet resolved due to insufficiently
supported views of various scholars and lack of research conducted on this area of study.
Though widely discussed, extensive research on the true origins of Swahili language and
Swahili speakers is still compelling. As far and the exigency of this area of study is
concerned, the research will basically provide directions to a better understanding of the
subject matter and the entire history of Swahili language and the Swahilis thus ending a
References
Nairobi.
Eastman, C.1971.Who are the Swahili?. In Africa: Journal of the international African
Useful Sites
http://www.zanzinet.org/zanzibar/people.html
http://orvillejenkins.com/profiles/swahili.html
http://www.jstor.org/view/00019720/ap040159/04a00070/3?frame=noframe&userID=ab
4... (JSTOR: Journal of the international African institute: vol.41, No.3, and p228-231)