Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
FACTORS AFFECTING OIL RING AND SLINGER LUBRICANT DELIVERY & STABILITY
Simon Bradshaw
Director of API Product Development & Technology
Jeremy Hawa
R&D Development Engineer
John Salerno
Owner
JCS Design
Waterloo, NY, USA
Simon Bradshaw is the Director of API
Product Development & Technology for
ITT Goulds Pumps, in Seneca Falls NY.
His responsibilities include the design
and development of new products and
processes. Prior to joining ITT Goulds,
he worked for both Sulzer Pumps and
Weir Pumps, where he held various positions of engineering
and contractual responsibility. Additionally he has supported
the Hydraulic Institute in the development of pump standards
and best practice guides.
Mr. Bradshaw has a BEng (Hons) degree (Mechanical
Engineering) from Heriot Watt University. He is a registered
Chartered Engineer in the UK and a member of the Institute of
Engineering Designers.
Jeremy Hawa is a Product Development
Engineer with ITT Goulds Pumps, in
Seneca Falls NY. His responsibilities
include design and development of new
pump products and processes for the oil
and gas markets. This specifically
includes new bearing housing design for
all API 610 compliant product lines.
Mr. Hawa has a B.S in Mechanical Engineering from SUNY at
Buffalo.
ABSTRACT
The choice of which lubrication strategy to apply for pump
bearings has implications for both the short term characteristics
exhibited by the bearings and their long term reliability. When
lubricating rolling element bearings, four basic strategies have
historically been employed:
Grease lubrication
Oil bath lubrication
Oil lubrication via slinger disc or oil ring
Oil mist lubrication
For high speed (3000 RPM and higher), slinger discs or oil
rings are commonly used due to the short re-greasing interval
exhibited with grease lubrication and the high heat generation
due to churning seen with oil bath lubrication.
Rotational speed
Slinger geometry
BACKGROUND
The lubrication methods for horizontal pump rolling
element bearings are widely known and many preferences exist
among the users and manufacturers of pumping equipment.
For smaller bearing arrangements and slower speeds oil
bath lubrication arrangements are commonly employed. In
these arrangements the normal oil level is set at around 1/3rd to
of the diameter of the rolling element ball (or roller) as
shown on Figure 1. These arrangements have the advantage of
simplicity of design and manufacture.
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this paper is to build upon existing papers
on oil ring and oil slinger delivery. Specifically it encompasses
the following goals:
Side by side comparison between oil rings and
slinger discs in a common arrangement
features of the test rig are shown in Figure 7a, 7b, 7c and 7d.
Internally the test rig is a close facsimile of half of the
geometry associated with bearing oil delivery for the
companys OH2 model line, specifically the SX size. This
arrangement uses cast sloping troughs to capture the oil thrown
by the oil delivery device (normally an oil ring) and deliver it to
both the radial and thrust bearings. In the test rig arrangement
the sloping trough is machined and attached to the housing to
allow adjustment if desired. The output of the trough is piped
through the front of the test rig into the collection/measurement
container.
The test rig is equipped with a viewing window and
internal lighting to allow close observation of the oil delivery
and to ensure that the oil level internal to the housing remains
at the desired level during testing.
SX thrust bearings
SX radial bearing
SX allowable speed range
SX cooling
SX lubrication method
7312
6212
1000 to 4000 RPM
Finned free convection or
Forced convection fan or
Fin tube cooling insert
Dual oil rings with ISO VG
68 oil
Figure 7c: End view of the Test Rig during roll/pitch testing
Figure 7b: End view of the Test Rig during roll/pitch testing
Copyright 2014 by Turbomachinery Laboratory, Texas A&M Engineering Experiment Station
10000
BASELINE TESTING
The test rig was setup with a 0.38 (9.5mm) oil
submergence and level stationary conditions. This represents
normal conditions in a land based installation.
Measurement of oil delivery was then made at a number of
speeds from 1000 RPM to 6000 RPM and is shown in Figure.
There are significant differences between how oil delivery
varies with speed. The oil ring delivery is lower at low shaft
RPM, increasing to peak value beyond which the delivery rate
declines. The slinger disc had the highest delivery at low shaft
RPM and declined continually up to the highest RPM.
Based on the minimum lubrication delivery line
established previously, it can be seen that the slinger disc oil
delivery was insufficient beyond around 2100 RPM. The oil
ring delivery from the bronze ring was sufficient over the full
range of speeds run. The nonmetallic ring fell slightly below
the minimum delivery at 1000 and 1200 RPM and again at
4100 RPM, exhibiting a narrower range of acceptable oil
delivery. One possible reason for this is that the nonmetallic
ring tended to displace towards the trough due to its lighter
weight. This created additional drag and contributed to the
slower ring speeds shown in Figure 13b.
1000
100
10
1
100
Bearing outer diameter D (mm)
1000
1000
100
Oil Flowrate (mL/min)
10
10
0.1
1000
2000
3000
4000
Shaft Speed (RPM)
5000
6000
100
Oil Flowrate (mL/min)
10
0.1
1000
2000
3000
4000
Shaft Speed (RPM)
5000
6000
1000
0.13" (3.2mm) Submergence
0.38" (9.5mm) Submergence
0.63" (15.9mm) Submergence
0.88" (22.2mm) Submergence
1.13" (28.6mm) Submergence
500
450
10
100
0.1
1000
400
350
300
250
200
150
2000
3000
4000
Shaft Speed (RPM)
5000
6000
100
1000
2000
3000
4000
Shaft Speed (RPM)
5000
6000
The results for the bronze oil ring show significantly more
variability than for the nonmetallic oil ring. This is related to
the stability of the ring particularly at high speeds and will be
discussed later.
500
The speeds of the oil rings was also measured and is shown
in Figures 13a and 13b. In general the nonmetallic oil ring
operated with ring speeds that were 61% to 74% of the speed
attained by the bronze oil ring. Since the speed of the ring
correlates loosely with oil delivery, the slower speeds were
likely part of the reason for the lower oil delivery from the
nonmetallic ring.
For the oil slinger disc it was found that small changes in
immersion depth yielded large changes in oil delivery rate. The
immersion depth was increased from 0.38 (9.5mm) in 0.125
450
Oil Ring Speed (RPM)
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
1000
2000
3000
4000
Shaft Speed (RPM)
5000
6000
100
10
0.1
1000
2000
3000
4000
Shaft Speed (RPM)
5000
6000
1000
100
10
0.1
1000
2000
3000
4000
Shaft Speed (RPM)
5000
6000
Figure 16: Oil delivery testing with the test rig in motion active pitch of 4 and active roll of 8 with a 15 sec. period
10
100
10
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
0
1000
10
2000
3000
4000
Shaft Speed (RPM)
5000
Contacts/min
1000
Stability
0
6000
0.1
1000
2000
3000
4000
Shaft Speed (RPM)
5000
6000
It was found that the bronze oil ring was less stable
particularly at 2 pole speeds and higher. Additionally the
number of observed contacts per minute rose continuously from
2400 RPM. In contrast the non-metallic ring contacts started to
rise only above 2 pole speeds and the number of contacts
remained less.
Figure 17: Oil delivery testing with a stationary test rig and
adverse housing angles (-4 pitch and -8 roll, see Figure 15).
Copyright 2014 by Turbomachinery Laboratory, Texas A&M Engineering Experiment Station
11
100
10
1
1000
2000
3000
4000
Shaft Speed (RPM)
5000
6000
Figure 20: Oil delivery testing with the out of round oil ring
overlaid with the results for a normal oil ring
12
DISCUSSION
COMPARISON OF OIL RING RESULTS WITH
PREVIOUS STUDIES
Lemmon & Booser (Lemmon and Booser, 1960), provided
a range of formulae to define the operational behavior of an oil
ring. For the geometry and speeds tested in this paper, the oil
ring was operating in Full-film Drive as defined in their
paper. For a 10% submergence and metric units, the equation
governing oil ring speed was defined as:
= 0.26
When the oil ring speed predicted by this formula (see Figure
21), is compared to the test results three observations can be
made
The Ettles formula was fitted to the test results and based
on this the following formula obtained:
=
8.2 10
500
450
Oil Ring Speed (RPM)
60 300
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
1000
2000
3000
4000
Shaft Speed (RPM)
5000
6000
13
NOMENCLATURE
FPSO = Floating Production Storage & Offloading vessel
API
= American Petroleum Institute
d
= rolling element bearing bore (mm)
=shaft diameter at oil ring (m)
ds
dm
= rolling element bearing mean diameter (d+D)/2
D
= rolling element bearing outside diameter (mm)
Dr
= oil ring inner diameter (m)
H
= Submergence of ring or disc into the oil (m)
L
= effective width of the disc (m)
N
= shaft speed (RPM)
Ndm
=the product of the shaft speed in RPM * the mean
bearing diameter in mm (RPM*mm)
Nr
= Oil ring speed (RPM)
U
= disc peripheral speed (m/s)
Q
= oil delivery (mL/min)
= the ratio of /1
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Special thanks to Cody Arliss for supporting the test rig
and helping with the many hours of testing required.
Copyright 2014 by Turbomachinery Laboratory, Texas A&M Engineering Experiment Station
14