Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
K HERHOLZ,
MD,
1,3
S F CARTER,
MSc
and 1M JONES,
MBChB, MRCP
Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, 2The Research School of Translational
Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester and 3The School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester,
Manchester, UK
Positron emission tomography (PET) utilizes biologically active molecules in micromolar or nanomolar
concentrations that have been labelled with short-lived
positron-emitting isotopes. The physical characteristics
of the isotopes and the molecular specificity of labelled
molecules, combined with the high detection efficacy of
modern PET scanners, provide a sensitivity for human in
vivo measurement of indicator concentrations that is
several orders of magnitude higher than with the other
imaging techniques. Whereas the very short half-lives of
O-15 (2 min) and C-11 (20 min) limit their use to fully
equipped PET centres with a cyclotron and radiopharmaceutical laboratory, F-18 labelled tracers (half-life
110 min) can be produced in specialized centres and
distributed regionally to hospitals running a PET scanner
only.
Clinical use of PET is now well established in clinical
oncology and it is therefore becoming widely available in
major hospitals. In addition to its use in research, brain
PET also provides diagnostically relevant information
mainly in neurodegenerative disorders, focal epilepsy
and brain tumours [1]. In dementia, the measurement of
Address correspondence to: Karl Herholz, Wolfson Molecular
Imaging Centre, The University of Manchester, 27 Palatine Road,
Withington, Manchester M20 3LJ, UK. E-mail: Karl.Herholz@
manchester.ac.uk
S160
Received 11 December
2007
Accepted 11 December
2007
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/97295129
2007 The British Institute of
Radiology
cerebral glucose metabolism by 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-Dglucose (FDG) and specific molecular imaging techniques involving tracers for amyloid and major neurotransmitters (see Table 1) are of diagnostic interest and
will therefore be reviewed in this paper.
typical anatomical distribution of metabolic abnormalities in AD. In a multicentre study involving 395 patients,
the sum of t-scores in those brain areas that are typically
affected in AD discriminated patients from control
subjects with 93% accuracy [8]. Discriminant functions
derived by multiple regression of regional data achieved
87% correct classification of AD patients vs control
subjects [11], and a neural network classifier arrived at
90% accuracy [12]. Several discriminant functions combined with principal component analysis or partial least
squares have been tested for discrimination between AD
and FTD in a sample of 48 patients with autopsyconfirmed diagnosis and achieved accuracies between
80% and 90% [13].
The abnormalities found in AD with FDG-PET mirror
those found with SPECT, and MRI [14] using blood flow
techniques; however, most direct comparison studies
have shown superior accuracy with PET [15, 16]. As
cerebral blood flow (CBF) is dependent on arterial pCO2
and therefore physiologically more variable than glucose
metabolism in normal subjects, CBF measurements using
PET (H215O) have relatively lower diagnostic power for
AD [17] than FDG-PET studies.
Microglial activation
The peripheral benzodiazepine receptor site (PBBS) is
found on the outer membrane of mitochondria and is
expressed only at low levels in the healthy human brain.
Increased expression has been observed using the
specific ligand 11C-PK11195, which has been shown to
reflect the distribution of activated microglia in experimental and human brain disease [56, 57]. Activated
microglia are present at sites of aggregated Ab deposition in the brains of AD subjects, although their precise
role in the disease process remains unclear [58]. A
moderate yet significant increase in 11C-PK11195 binding
was observed in patients with AD compared with
healthy control subjects [59] and also in other neurodegenerative diseases such as frontotemporal lobar degeneration [60] and Huntingtons disease [61].
S163
Cholinergic receptors
Dopamine
Serotonin
Impairment of serotonergic innervation has mostly
been studied in the context of depression, and depression is also a major clinical issue in dementia. A
reduction of receptor-binding potential in AD has been
observed mainly for 5-HT(2A) receptors [79, 80]. In MCI,
reduced 5-HT(2A) binding in the striatum was correlated
with depression and anxiety scores [81].
S164
Summary
Brain PET using FDG is a firmly established technique
for demonstration of regional functional impairment in
neurodegenerative disease. AD is associated with typical
regional impairment of posterior cortical association
areas that allow very early diagnosis before clinical
manifestation of dementia and monitoring of progression and treatment effects. DLB additionally involves
metabolic impairment of the primary visual cortex.
Predominant impairment of the frontal and anterior
temporal regions is seen in FTD, primary progressive
aphasia and semantic dementia. New perspectives are
opened by tracers for imaging amyloids, which appear to
be very sensitive for detecting even preclinical AD cases,
although confirmation of the specificity remains to be
demonstrated. Tracers for measuring local AChE activity
and the binding capacity of nicotinic and serotonergic
receptors address neurotransmitter deficits in dementia.
Impairment of dopamine synthesis that is characteristic
for DLB can be demonstrated by 18F-fluorodopa PET.
The British Journal of Radiology, Special Issue 2007
References
1. Herholz K, Herscovitch P, Heiss WD. NeuroPET. Berlin/
New York: Springer, 2004.
2. Sokoloff L. Relation between physiological function and
energy metabolism in the central nervous system. [Review].
Journal of Neurochemistry 1977;29:1326.
3. Kuhl DE, Metter EJ, Riege WH, Phelps ME. Effects of
human aging on patterns of local cerebral glucose utilization determined by the [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose method.
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 1982;2:
16371.
4. Herholz K. PET studies in dementia. Annals of Nuclear
Medicine 2003;17:7989.
5. Bartzokis G, Lu PH, Mintz J. Human brain myelination and
amyloid beta deposition in Alzheimers disease.
Alzheimers and Dement 2007;3:1225.
6. Minoshima S, Giordani B, Berent S, Frey KA, Foster NL,
Kuhl DE. Metabolic reduction in the posterior cingulate
cortex in very early Alzheimers disease. Ann Neurol
1997;42:8594.
7. Gusnard DA, Raichle ME, Raichle ME. Searching for a
baseline: functional imaging and the resting human brain.
Nat Rev Neurosci 2001;2:68594.
8. Herholz K, Salmon E, Perani D, Baron JC, Holthoff V,
Frolich L, et al. Discrimination between Alzheimer dementia and controls by automated analysis of multicenter FDG
PET. NeuroImage 2002;17:30216.
9. Burdette JH, Minoshima S, Vander Borght T, Tran DD, Kuhl
DE. Alzheimer disease: improved visual interpretation of
PET images by using three-dimensional stereotaxic surface
projections. Radiology 1996;198:83743.
10. Ishii K, Willoch F, Minoshima S, Drzezga A, Ficaro EP,
Cross DJ, et al. Statistical brain mapping of 18F-FDG PET in
Alzheimers disease: validation of anatomic standardization
for atrophied brains. J Nucl Med 2001;42:54857.
11. Azari NP, Pettigrew KD, Schapiro MB, Haxby JV, Grady
CL, Pietrini P, et al. Early detection of Alzheimers disease:
a statistical approach using positron emission tomographic
data. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
1993;13:43847.
12. Kippenhan JS, Barker WW, Nagel J, Grady C, Duara R.
Neural-network classification of normal and Alzheimers
disease subjects using high-resolution and low-resolution
PET cameras. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 1994;35:715.
13. Higdon R, Foster NL, Koeppe RA, DeCarli CS, Jagust WJ,
Clark CM, et al. A comparison of classification methods for
differentiating fronto-temporal dementia from Alzheimers
disease using FDG-PET imaging. Stat Med 2004;23:31526.
14. Johnson NA, Jahng GH, Weiner MW, Miller BL, Chui HC,
Jagust WJ, et al. Pattern of cerebral hypoperfusion in
Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment measured with arterial spin-labeling MR imaging: initial
experience. Radiology 2005;234:8519.
15. Herholz K, Schopphoff H, Schmidt M, Mielke R, Eschner
W, Scheidhauer K, et al. Direct comparison of spatially
normalized PET and SPECT scans in Alzheimer disease.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2002;43:216.
16. Messa C, Perani D, Lucignani G, Zenorini A, Zito G, et al.
High-resolution technetium-99m-HMPAO SPECT in
patients with probable Alzheimers disease: comparison
with fluorine-18-FDG PET. Journal of Nuclear Medicine
1994;35:21016.
17. Powers WJ, Perlmutter JS, Videen TO, Herscovitch P,
Griffeth LK, Royal HD, et al. Blinded clinical evaluation
of positron emission tomography for diagnosis of probable
Alzheimers disease. Neurology 1992;42:76570.
18. Jagust WJ, Friedland RP, Budinger TF, Koss E, Ober B.
Longitudinal studies of regional cerebral metabolism in
Alzheimers disease. Neurology 1988;38:90912.
S165
S166
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
S167