Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Soil nail walls consists of installing passive reinforcement (i.e., no post-tensioning) in existing
ground by installing closely spaced steel bars or sections (i.e., nails) and placing a front face
support. Soil nails are later grouted if they are installed in drilled holes. Ungrouted soil nails are
also possible if nails (or steel sections) are driven into the ground. Figure 1 shows typical details of
a soil nail wall:
Figure 2: Typical soil nail head plate and shotcrete details (US Practice)
Soil nailing is typically used to stabilize existing slopes or excavations where top-to-bottom
construction is advantageous compared to other retaining wall systems. For certain conditions, soil
nailing offers a viable alternative from the viewpoint of technical feasibility, construction costs, and
construction duration when compared to ground anchor walls, which is another popular top-to
bottom retaining system.
Soil nail walls are particularly well suited to excavation applications for ground conditions
that require vertical or near-vertical cuts and have been shown to be particularly well suited in the
following temporary or permanent applications:
2-m (3- to 6-ft) high vertical or nearly vertical cut for one to two days.
All soil nails within a cross section are located above the groundwater table
If soil nails are below the groundwater table, and the groundwater does not adversely
affect the face of the excavation, the bond strength of the interface between the grout and
the surrounding ground, or the long-term integrity of the soil nails (e.g., the chemical
characteristics of the ground do not promote corrosion).
Soil nail walls exhibit numerous advantages when compared to ground anchors and alternative
topdown construction techniques. Some of these advantages are described below:
Requires smaller right of wat than ground anchors as soil nails are typically shorter;
Less disruptive to traffic and causes less environmental impact compared to other
construction methods.
Provide a less congested work place, particularly when compared to
bracedexcavations.
There is no need to embed any structural element below the bottom of excavation as
(cobbles or boulders, piles or underground utilities) are encountered. On the other hand,
the horizontal position of ground anchors is more difficult to modify almost making
field adjustments costly.
Since considerably more soil nails are used than ground anchors, adjustments to the
design layout of the soil nails are more easily accomplished in the field without
compromising the level of safety.
Overhead construction requirements are smaller than those for ground anchor walls
because soil nail walls do not require the installation of soldier beams (especially when
construction occurs under a bridge).
Soil nailing is advantageous at sites with remote access because smaller equipment
is generally needed.
Soil nail walls are relatively flexible and can accommodate relatively large total
flexibility.
Soil nail walls are more economical than conventional concrete gravity walls when
anchor walls when conventional soil nailing construction procedures are used.
Shotcrete facing is typically less costly than the structural facing required for other
wall systems.
Soil nail disadvantages
Some of the potential disadvantages of soil nail walls are:
Soil nail walls may not be appropriate for applications where very strict deformation
control is required for structures and utilities located behind the proposed wall, as the
system requires some soil deformation to mobilize resistance. Deflections can be reduced
by post tensioning but at an increased cost.
Existing utilities may place restrictions on the location, inclination, and length of soil
nails.
Soil nail walls are not well-suited where large amounts of groundwater seeps into