Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
DOI 10.1007/s10560-011-0235-z
Abstract The prevention of Rapid Repeat Births (RRBs) and Teen Repeat Births
(TRBs) is an important indicator of the effectiveness of home visitation programs
that serve mothers who are at-risk for child maltreatment. This study examined the
effects on RRBs and TRBs of a rural/small town home visitation program based on
the Healthy Families America (HFA) model. The participants in this study were
referred between 1999 and 2007 and included a Treatment Group of 140 at-risk
mothers who met minimum engagement criteria and a Comparison Group of 241 atrisk mothers who were referred for services but not enrolled due to limits on
program capacity. In addition, county-wide TRB data was used as the basis for a
static group comparison. With regard to RRBs, the rates for the Treatment (18%)
and Comparison (30%) groups were compared using a Chi-Square test of homogeneity. The null hypothesis that there would be no difference between the rates for
the two groups was rejected at the .05 level. Similarly, with regard to TRBs, the null
hypothesis that there would be no difference between the rates for the Treatment
(9%) and Comparison (27%) groups was rejected at that .01 level. Furthermore,
using a Chi-Square test of independence, this investigation tested the null hypothesis
that the rates for the two groups would not differ from the county-wide rate (24%).
This hypothesis was also rejected at the .01 level. Overall, these results of this
inquiry support the conclusion that participants in a rigorously implemented HFA
program show significantly lower rates of RRB and TRB when compared to a
comparable group of at-risk nonparticipants. They also appear to have a significantly lower incidence of TRB than teen mothers in the general population.
M. Ownbey J. Ownbey
Catawba Valley Healthy Families, Barium Springs Home for Children, Statesville, NC, USA
J. Cullen (&)
Institute for Health and Human Services, ASU Box 32102, Boone, NC 28608, USA
e-mail: cullenjc@appstate.edu
123
440
Keywords
America
M. Ownbey et al.
Introduction
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS 2000) defines
Rapid Repeat Births (RRBs) as births that occur in intervals of less than 24 months.
It uses the term Teen Repeat Births (TRBs) to refer to multiple births to a teen
mother regardless of birth interval. Preventing RRBs and TRBs among at-risk
mothers has been a key public health objective over the past 40 years. The emphasis
given to this objective is well justified by a substantial body of research on the
negative effects of short birth intervals and/or multiple births during the teen years,
particularly among mothers at-risk for child maltreatment. The following sections
will review this body of research along with the evidence base that supports the use
of home visitation as a primary prevention strategy.
123
441
resources decreased significantly following the birth of a new baby and that positive
interactions with the older child diminished. In particular, the authors found that
parental warmth diminished, controlling parenting styles became more prevalent,
and physical discipline increased. These conclusions were extended to at-risk
mothers by El-Kamary et al. (2004) who, in a study of Hawaiis Healthy Start
program, found that mothers who had a subsequent birth within 3 years of the birth
of the index child were more likely to show poor warmth to the index child.
Research on families with short birth intervals has been especially consistent in
documenting changes in family dynamics associated with subsequent births.
Specifically, studies have found that positive interactions between primary
caregivers and eldest children are especially likely to diminish in families with
short birth intervals (Baydar and Greek 1997; El-Kamary et al. 2004). In addition, a
number of studies have found a higher incidence of child maltreatment in families
with closely spaced children. Groothuis et al. (1982), for example, found that
families with twins, the most extreme example of closely spaced births, had a higher
incidence of child abuse than families with a single child. Similarly, Benedict et al.
(1985), in a study of the relationship between maternal peri-natal risk factors and
child abuse, found a inverse relationship between birth interval and incidence of
maltreatment. These results were replicated by Zuravin (1988) who, in a study of the
connection between fertility patterns and child maltreatment, found that closely
spaced births increased the risk of physical abuse and neglect. Closely spaced births
have also been found to be associated with a higher risk of childhood injury
(Nathens et al. 2000). Based on these findings, many child welfare organizations
have concluded that helping mothers adequately space births will have a positive
effect on child safety and well-being.
123
442
M. Ownbey et al.
123
443
123
444
M. Ownbey et al.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
In an effort to meet its program goals and minimize family stress that can result
in child abuse and neglect, one focus of HFA is to help mothers delay subsequent
births and, in the case of teen mothers, multiple births during the teen years. By
helping overburdened mothers space their children, HFA seeks to improve the
likelihood of positive parentchild interactions by avoiding the increase in negative
mother-firstborn child interactions often associated with the birth of a second child
and protecting the mothers available time to attend to her firstborn child.
123
445
Table 1 Studies of home visitation programs that found positive treatment effects for RRB and TRB
Study
Findings
Table 2 Studies of home visitation programs that did not find positive treatment effects for RRB and
TRB
Study
Findings
Mothers served by Hawaiis Healthy program did not differ in their rates of
rapid repeat pregnancies from mothers in a control group
Koniak-Griffin et al.
(2002, 2003)
Stevens-Simon et al.
(2001)
Critique
While studies of the effects of home visitation on rates of RRB and TRB have not
consistently shown positive results, a number of authors have commented that these
123
446
M. Ownbey et al.
Methods
This study is based upon an analysis of data collected by an HFA credentialed
program in rural Western North Carolina from 1999 through 2007. The following
narrative will describe the participants, treatment model, research design, sampling,
instrumentation, and data analysis procedures that support the defensibility of this
investigation and inspire confidence in its results.
Research Design
While this investigation utilized a comparison group, it was not a true control group
due to an inability to randomly assign subjects. It also focused on dependent
variables that could only be measured post-intervention. Therefore, it is properly
considered a post-test only, non-equivalent control group design which authoritative
sources (Campbell and Stanley 1963; Fraenkel and Wallen 2009) describe as
defensible but with threats to internal validity associated with group equivalence;
e.g., selection, regression, maturation, and/or mortality. External validity treats
123
447
associated with this design include interaction of selection and treatment and
multiple treatment interference.
To control effectively for the rival hypotheses of selection, regression, and
maturation, this inquiry collected key risk and demographic information on subjects
to evaluate group equivalence. Statistical tests, including t-test and Chi-square
procedures, were used to evaluate the significance of group differences and assure
that the Treatment and Comparison groups were similar with regard to age, risk
level, and ethnicity. In addition, the low attrition rate (13%) in the treatment group
strongly suggests that mortality would not is not a viable alternative explanation for
the results of this investigation.
Regarding external validity threats, the threat of interaction between selection
and treatment is minimized by the fact that the Treatment and Comparison groups
were closely matched on the salient treatment factors of age, risk level, and
ethnicity. However, given that this investigation was field-based and that the
participants had exposure to a range of human service options, it is impossible to
rule out the threat of multiple treatment interference. The implications of this threat
will be explored in the Discussion section.
Sampling
Participants for this investigation were referred to a rural/small town Healthy
Families America (HFA) program between 6/01/2000 and 7/6/2007. Expectant
parents and parents with an infant under 3 months of age were identified, screened,
and referred by Maternal Care Coordinators from the county Health Department, the
Nursing staffs of local hospitals and two local Obstetrics practices, and Social
Workers from the county Department of Social Services.
Referrals were prioritized based on the results of an informal pre-screening
checklist (Frankel et al. 2000) that included the following indicators of risk for child
maltreatment: (a) Late or no prenatal care or poor compliance, (b) Abortion/
adoption unsuccessfully sought or attempted during pregnancy, (c) Inadequate
income, (d) Single parent, (e) No telephone, (f) Unstable housing, (g) History of
sexual abuse, (h) History of substance abuse, (i) History of abortions, (j) History of
psychiatric care, (k) Employment problems, (l) Marital or family problems,
(m) Education under 12 years, (n) History of or current depression, (o) Inadequate
emergency contacts, and (p) Child protective services history. The priority status of
a referral depended upon (a) the number of at-risk indicators they exhibited and
(b) their responses to the most critical indicators (i.e., items that are known to have
the strongest relationship with abusive and/or neglectful parenting behaviors).
Minimum requirements for a positive screen were an affirmative response to either
item a or item b, affirmative responses to two or more indicators, or unknown
responses to seven or more indicators.
To receive services, families who screened positive on the referral questionnaire
were further evaluated on the Kempe Family Stress Inventory (KFSI; Murphy et al.
1985; Orkow 1985), an established indicator of parental risk for child maltreatment.
To be eligible, families had to score in the at-risk range based on the normative
standards of the KFSI. Because the participants were referrals from human service
123
448
M. Ownbey et al.
agencies, the sampling approach for this study is most accurately described as
convenience sampling. This method of sampling, while not ideal, is defensible when
dealing with participants that cannot be accessed through randomized procedures
(Fraenkel and Wallen 2006).
Participants
Study participants included 402 pregnant or new mothers, 232 of whom were in
their teens when they were referred to the program. Due to limited service capacity,
161 of these mothers, including 90 teen mothers, were enrolled in the program
during the time of the study while 241 mothers, including 142 teen mothers, could
not be enrolled. Of the 161 mothers enrolled, 21 (13%) withdrew before they met
the minimum engagement criteria (defined by HFA as participation in 75% of home
visits over the first 3 months of service). A profile of key demographic
characteristics (age, risk factors, and ethnicity) of the 161 enrolled, 21 drop-out
and 241 non-enrolled mothers can be found in Table 3. As these data indicate, the
three groups appear to be fairly similar in terms of age, risk factors, and ethnic
distribution. Nonetheless, to eliminate the problem of small sample size and create
the most parsimonious design for this inquiry, the drop out group was not included
in further analyses.
To establish the comparability of the remaining two groupsa Treatment Group
consisting of 140 at-risk mothers (90 teen mothers) who met minimum engagement
criteria and a Comparison Group of 241 at-risk mothers (130 teen mothers) who
could not be enrolled due to full caseloadsthe examiners used pooled variance ttests to evaluate comparisons based on interval and ratio-level data and a Chi-square
test of homogeneity to evaluate points of comparison that were based on nominal
Table 3 Demographic characteristics of enrolled, not enrolled and drop-out groups
Attributes
Enrolled
(n = 140)
Not enrolled
(n = 241)
Dropout
(n = 21)
20.37
20.89
19.90
Range
13.8340.5
14.8535.5
15.0829.58
SD
4.73
3.96
3.88
Age
Risk factors
X
5.9
5.0
5.2
Range
214
213
211
SD
2.20
2.54
2.49
Teen % (N)
64 (90)
54 (130)
57 (12)
White % (N)
81 (113)
81 (196)
86 (18)
14 (20)
13 (30)
9.4 (2)
Hispanic % (N)
1.5 (2)
2 (5)
0 (0)
Asian % (N)
2.8 (4)
4 (10)
4.6 (1)
.7 (1)
0 (0)
0 (0)
123
449
data. The results of these analyses are profiled in Tables 4 and 5. As these data
indicate, t-test results revealed a significant difference between the Treatment Group
and the Comparison Group with respect to mean at-risk factors (5.9 vs. 5.0,
p = .001). However, when a Chi-square test of homogeneity was used to compare
observed demographic frequencies in the Comparison Group to expected frequencies in the Treatment Group, the results indicate that the null hypothesis of no group
differences can be accepted (v2 = 8.083, p = .1517 at 5 df); that is, that the two
groups do not differ with respect to ethnic composition or proportion of adolescent
mothers. Based on these findings, it was concluded that the two groups were
sufficiently similar to treat them as equivalent for the purposes of this investigation.
Nonetheless, the implications of group dissimilarity in risk factors will be explored
in the Discussion section.
Data Collection
Birth information was gathered in a number of ways. For the Treatment Group,
information on the birth of the index child and all subsequent children was gathered
by Family Support Workers on referral forms and during home visits as long as
Table 4 Demographic characteristics of Treatment and Comparison groups with pooled variance t-test
results
Group
Mean
Age
SD
Age
Mean
Risk factors
SD
Risk factors
Treatment
140
20.37
4.73
5.9
2.54
T
Probability
p = .25
Accept Ho
Comparison
241
20.81
3.94
5.0
2.46
p = .001
Reject Ho
Table 5 Chi-Square test for homogeneity of demographic characteristics of comparison and treatment
groups
Observed
(comparison)
Expected (based
on treatment group)
O-E
(O - E)2
(O - E)2/E
Adolescent
130
154.2 (64%)
-24.2
585.64
3.80
White
196
195.2 (81%)
.8
.64
.003
30
33.7 (14%)
-3.7
13.69
.406
.544
African American
Hispanic
Asian
Native American
Totals
3.6 (1.5%)
1.4
1.96
10
6.7 (2.8%)
3.3
10.89
1.63
1.7 (.7%)
-1.7
2.89
1.70
241
v2 = 8.083, p = .1517 at 5 df
241
Accept Ho
Ho The ethnic profiles of the comparison group will not differ from the ethnic profile of the treatment
group
123
450
M. Ownbey et al.
123
451
degree of ethnic diversity, they closely matched the ethnic composition of the
county and the clientele of the program. In addition, all staff members had work
experience in human services when they were hired, ranging from 6 to 20 years,
with an average of 14.5 years. Furthermore, careful attention was given to personal
qualities that would enable FSWs to address difficult topics with their clients.
Specifically, FSWs were screened for their ability to confidently and sensitively
address the subjects of family planning, domestic violence, substance abuse, and
parental depression. Degree status was not a significant factor in personnel
selection. As a result, the educational backgrounds of the seven FSWs who
participated in this study were quite varied, including one high school graduate, two
with associate degrees, and four with bachelor degrees.
Regarding training, all FSWs participated in an extensive regimen of rigorous,
outcome-based training and development activities. These activities included:
(a) Connecting with Families: Family Support in Practice, a 6-day training program
that teaches essential intervention and treatment practices that are respectful to such
factors as gender, age, race, ethnicity, religion, geographical region, family
traditions, and lifestyle; (b) Family-Centered Practice in Family Preservation
Programs, a second 6-day training program focused on principles of partnership,
relationship-building, and strengths-based intervention; (c) HFA Role-Specific Core
Training, a pre-service curriculum that addresses principles of home visitation,
family assessment, and/or program management; (d) HFA mandated continuing
education, which includes a set of advanced training modules on maternal health,
child development and parenting skills that all staff members are required to
complete within their first year of employment; and (e) On-going in-service training
on various topics through staff meetings, seminars, workshops, and conferences. In
addition, to supplement formal training, supervisors provided opportunities for
FSWs to shadow experienced practitioners and observe them apply the skills they
had learned in training sessions.
Regarding supervision and evaluation, the FSWs who participated in this study
received weekly one-on-one reflective supervision and regular supervised co-visits
throughout their tenure in the program. In addition, the performance of FSWs was
routinely evaluated via direct observation and the collection of consumer
satisfaction surveys. These data sources were used to assure program quality and
fidelity to treatment goals and methods.
Hypotheses
The following sections with discuss the results of this inquiry with respect to the
following three null hypotheses:
Ho 1 The distribution of RRBs in the treatment group will not differ from the
distribution of RRBs in the Comparison group.
Ho 2 The distribution of TRBs in the treatment group will not differ from the
distribution of TRBs in the Comparison group.
123
452
M. Ownbey et al.
Ho 3 The distributions of TRBs in the Treatment and Comparison groups will not
differ from those that would be expected based on county-wide census and public
health data.
Results
Results of this study are profiled in Tables 6, 7, and 8. As Table 6 indicates, the
results of a Chi-square test of homogeneity reveals that the difference between the
RRB rates for the Treatment Group (18%) and the Comparison Group (30%) was
statistically significant .05 level (v2 = 5.07, p = .0243at 1 df). Based on these
findings, Ho 1 can be rejected. Specifically, they demonstrate that at-risk mothers
who participate in a rigorously implemented HFA program exhibit significantly
lower rates of RRB than a comparable group of nonparticipants.
With regard to TRBs, the results of a Chi-square test of homogeneity profiled in
Table 7 reveals that the differences in the distributions of TRBs in Treatment Group
(9%) and Comparison Group (27%) were statisticallysignificant at the .01 level
(v2 = 8.87, p = .0029 at 1 df). Based on these findings, Ho 2 can be rejected.
Specifically, they demonstrate that at-risk teen mothers who participate in a
rigorously implemented HFA program exhibit significantly lower rates of TRB than
a comparable group of teen mother nonparticipants. Similarly, as Table 8 indicates,
the results of a Chi-square test of independence revealed that the distribution of
rates of TRB in the Treatment and Control groups differed markedly from the
county-wide rate of TRB (24%) at p \ .01 level (v2 = 8.02, p = .0027 at 1 df).
These data indicate that Ho 3 can also be rejected; that is, that the distributions
conform to county-wide norms. Upon inspection it is evident that the data are
skewed by a lower frequency of TRB among the Treatment Group participants.
Table 6 v2 Test of homogeneity for RRB using mean rate for both groups (26%) as the expected rate
N
% Observed
F observed
F expected
O-E
(O - E)2
(O - E)2/E
Treatment
140
18
25
35.6
-10.6
112.36
3.16
Comparison
241
30
72
61.2
10.8
116.64
1.91
Total
281
25.2
97
Table 7 v2 Test of homogeneity for TRB using mean rate for both groups (20%) as the expected rate
N
Treatment
% Observed
F observed
F expected
O-E
(O - E)2
(O - E)2/E
90
17.6
-9.6
92.16
5.24
Comparison
130
27
35
25.4
9.6
92.16
3.63
Total
220
19.55
43
123
453
Table 8 v2 Test of independence for TRB using county-wide rate (24%) as the expected rate
N
Treatment
% Observed
F observed
F expected
O-E
(O - E)2
(O - E)2/E
90
21.6
-13.6
184.96
8.56
Comparison
130
27
35
31.2
3.8
14.44
.46
Total
220
19.55
43
Discussion
Relative to the Comparison Group and the community at large, clients of the HFA
program examined in this study exhibited significantly reduced rates of RRB and
TRB. These results provide evidence that well designed Healthy Families programs
implemented with fidelity can have significant positive effects on a key indicator of
the effectiveness of home visitation programs that serve mothers at-risk for child
maltreatment. Specifically, relative to the Treatment Group, rates of RRB were 60%
higher in Comparison Group. Similarly, teen mothers in the Comparison Group
were three times more likely to have a second birth during adolescence than were
teen mothers in the Treatment Group. Furthermore, teen mothers who participated
in the program were more than 67% less likely to have a TRB than nonparticipants
and 63% less likely to have a TRB than teens in the community at large. These
findings are especially noteworthy in light of the fact that the Treatment Group
consisted of at-risk mothers who, on average, exhibited a significantly higher
number of risk factors than participants in the Comparison Group.
While favorable, these results must be considered in light of the limitations of
this inquiry. Specifically, it relied, in effect, on a convenience sample and lacked
random assignment. In addition, the treated and untreated conditions were not
carefully controlled, leading to the question of multiple treatment interference. This
question is especially critical in light of the fact that the model of intervention used
was highly individualized and encouraged participants to access a full range of
services in the community, resulting in differences across clients in the level and
type of services provided. Furthermore, since RRB and TRB data on the
Comparison Group were gathered from public records, there were no opportunities
to follow up with these participants to determine what, if any, services they received
from other programs.
Nonetheless, the results are rather striking and somewhat out of synch with the
results of similar studies of home visitation programs. The authors propose four
specific factors that may account for these outcomes. The first is that the HFA
program in this study, as discussed previously, was rigorously implemented and
incorporated many characteristics found in effective prevention programs (Klerman
2004; and Omar et al. 2008).
Secondly, the HFA program described in this study exhibited low rates of staff
turnover throughout the intervention period. Specifically, the mean length of service
for the employees who participated in this investigation was 4.7 years. This feature
circumvented many of the implementation challenges described in previous studies
of HFA and of home visitation in general.
123
454
M. Ownbey et al.
Thirdly, the mothers in this study were enrolled prenatally whenever possible.
The programs emphasis on this feature was based on the conviction that it is
essential to offer services when mothers are most open and receptive to assistance
(Frankel et al. 2000). It is the authors observation that early engagement was
instrumental in facilitating a strong bond between the mother and the FSW. This
bond provided clients with opportunities to revise their working models of
attachment and, as a result, establish a foundation for building closer and more
functional bonds with their children (Rutter and OConnor 1999; Sroufe et al. 1999).
The strength of these bonds may have provided the motivation for participants to
delay subsequent births.
Finally and most importantly, it is the authors belief that the success of this
program in preventing RRB and TRB was mostly due to the depth and intensity of
the services provided. Specifically, services to mothers and other caregivers focused
on the development of life skills. In this regard, FSWs used home visits to engage in
frank discussion aimed at assisting clients to improve their judgment and change
counter-productive ways of thinking. Specific intervention techniques included
solution-focused problem solving and providing mothers with individualized
rationales about the benefits and costs of their choices.
Beyond individual work, FSWs helped mothers develop social supports, find
stable housing, and find economic supports as needed. Mothers were also given
assistance in accessing needed educational resources so that they could return to or
continue in school or work after giving birth. This assistance often included
adequate and affordable childcare. In addition, Family Support workers endeavored
to: (a) establish and maintain mutually respectful therapeutic relationships with
parents, (b) deliver services within a flexible framework to allow for individualization to meet the specific needs of each family; and (c) remain involved with
families over a long period of time. Collectively, these interventions contributed to
feelings of security, purpose, and hopefulness; all of which supported their decisions
to delay subsequent births.
With regard to family planning, FSWs educated parents in a culturally sensitive
manner on available contraceptive methods helped them decide which ones were
best for them. They also offered frequent, ongoing information on their consistent
and proper use. In addition, motivational interviewing was used to encourage
parents to delay subsequent births (Britt et al. 2004; Petersen et al. 2007; StevensSimon et al. 1991). Furthermore, FSWs responded to parental resistance with
encouragement and support for their self-efficacy. Other evidence based features of
the program included a strength-based philosophy, voluntary enrollment, regularly
scheduled home visits, and the use of tested curricula to structure home visits
(Heaman et al. 2006).
Conclusions
Participation in a rigorously implemented, early intervention home visitation
program for at-risk mothers based on the Healthy Families America Model was
associated with a significantly reduced frequency of RRB and TRB among the
123
455
mothers it served. It is the authors contention that these findings provide valuable
direction for the future development of home visiting programs in general and for
Healthy Families programs in particular. Based on the results of this study, the
examiners would offer the following conclusions:
1.
2.
3.
Finally, this investigation points to a need for further research. Future inquiry
into the effects of home visitation should examine such factors as effective staff
training and supervision strategies, reliable program replication, traditional and
nontraditional program outcomes, and identification of active program ingredients.
Acknowledgment The authors gratefully acknowledge Shanna Carswell-Worley, Lisa Ross, and Janice
Atkinson for their dedicated service and commitment to the mothers served by the Catawba Valley Health
Families program. This article would not have been possible without their efforts.
References
Barnet, B., Liu, J., DeVoe, M., Alperovitz-Bichell, K., & Duggan, A. (2007). Home visiting for
adolescent mothers: Effects on parenting, maternal life course, and primary care linkage. Annals of
Family Medicine, 5(3), 224232.
Baydar, N., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Furstenberg, F. (1993). Early warning signs of functional illiteracy:
Predictors in childhood and adolescence. Child Development, 64(3), 815829.
Baydar, N., & Greek, A. (1997). A longitudinal study of the effects of the birth of a sibling during the first
six years of life. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 939956.
Benedict, M., White, R., & Cornely, D. (1985). Maternal and perinatal risk factors and child abuse. Child
Abuse & Neglect, 9, 217224.
Black, M. M., Bentley, M. E., Papas, M. A., Oberlander, S., Teti, L. O., McNary, S., et al. (2006).
Delaying second births among adolescent mothers: A randomized, controlled trial of a home-based
mentoring program. Pediatrics, 118, e1087e1099.
Black, D., Heyman, R., & Slep, A. (2001). Risk factors for child physical abuse. Aggression and Violent
Behavior, 6(2), 121188.
Blankson, M. L., Cliver, S. P., Goldenberg, R. L., Hickey, C. A., Jin, J., & Dubard, M. B. (1993). Health
behavior and outcomes in sequential pregnancies of black and white adolescents. The Journal of the
American Medical Association, 269, 14011403.
Britt, E., Hudson, S., & Blampied, N. (2004). Motivational interviewing in health settings: A review.
Patient Education and Counseling, 53(2), 147155.
123
456
M. Ownbey et al.
Brody, D. J., & Bracken, M. B. (1987). Short interpregnancy interval: A risk factor for low birthweight.
American Journal of Perinatology, 4, 5054.
Campbell, D., & Stanley, J. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston:
Houghton-Mifflin Company.
Carolina State Center for Health Statistics. (20002007). Basic automated birth yearbook: BABYBOOK.
Retrieved January 10, 2010 from http://www.schs.state.nc.us/SCHS/births.
Conde-Agudelo, A., Rosas-Bermudez, A., & Kafury-Goeta, A. C. (2006). Birth spacing and risk of
adverse perinatal outcomes: A meta-analysis. The Journal of the American Medical Association,
295(15), 18091823.
Dailard, C. (2000). Reviving interest in policies and programs to help teens prevent repeat births.
Guttmacher Report on Public Policy, 3(3), 12.
Dangal, G. (2005). An update on teenage pregnancy. The Internet Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 5(1).
Retrieved May 17, 2010, from http://www.ispub.com/journal/the_internet_journal_of_gynecology_
and_obstetrics.html
DeFranco, E. A., Stamilio, D. M., Boslaugh, S. E., Gross, G. A., & Muglia, L. J. (2007). A short
interpregnancy interval is a risk factor for preterm birth and its recurrence. American Journal of
Obstetrics & Gynecology, 197(3), 264.e1264.e6.
DePanfilis, D., & Zuravin, S. (2002). The effect of services on the recurrence of child maltreatment. Child
Abuse and Neglect, 26(2), 187205.
Diaz, J., Oshana, D., & Harding, K. (2004). Healthy Families America: 2003 profile of program sites.
Chicago: Prevent Child Abuse America.
Downey, D. B., Powell, B., Steelman, L. C., & Pribesh, S. (1999). Much ado about siblings: Change
models, sibship size, and intellectual development. American Sociological Review, 64, 193198.
Dubow, E., & Luster, T. (1990). Adjustment of children born to teenage mothers: The contribution of risk
and protective factors. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 52(2), 393404.
Dunn, J., & Kendrick, C. (1980). The arrival of a sibling: Changes in patterns of interaction between
mother and first-born child. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 21(2), 119132.
El-Kamary, S., Higman, S., Fuddy, L., McFarlane, E., Sia, C., & Duggan, A. (2004). Hawaiis Healthy
Start home visiting program: Determinants and impact of rapid repeat birth. Pediatrics, 114(3),
e317e326.
Field, T., Widmayer, S., Greenberg, R., & Stoller, S. (1982). Effects of parent training on teenage mothers
and their infants. Pediatrics, 69, 703707.
Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M. & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation
research: A synthesis of the literature (pp. 24560). Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis
de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network (FMHI
Publication #231). http://www.fpg.unc.edu/*nirn/resources/publications/Monograph.
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education (6th ed.).
Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Fraenkel, J., & Wallen, N. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed.). New
York: McGraw-Hill.
Frankel, S., Friedman, L., Johnson, A., Thies-Huber, A., & Zuiderveen, S. (2000). Appendix A: The
critical elements. In A. Johnson (Ed.), Healthy families America site development guide (pp.
173209). Chicago, IL: Prevent Child Abuse America.
Fuentes-Afflick, E., & Hessol, N. A. (2000). Interpregnancy interval and the risk of premature infants.
Obstetrics and Gynecology, 95(3), 383390.
Furstenberg, F., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Morgan, S. (1987). Adolescent mothers in later life. New York, NY:
Cambridge University Press.
Gilbert, W., Jandial, D., Field, N., Bigelow, P., & Danielsen, B. (2004). Birth outcomes in teenage
pregnancies. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 16(5), 265270.
Gortzak-Uzan, L., Hallak, M., Press, F., Katz, M., & Shoham-Vardi, I. (2001). Teenage pregnancy: Risk
factors for adverse perinatal outcome. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, 10(6), 393397.
Grisaru-Granovsky, S., Gordon, E. S., Haklai, Z., Samueloff, A., & Schimmel, M. M. (2009). Effect of
interpregnancy interval on adverse perinatal outcomesa national study. Contraception, 80(6),
512518.
Groothuis, J. R., Altemeier, W. A., Robarge, J. P., OConnor, S., Sandler, H., Vietze, P., et al. (1982).
Increased child abuse in families with twins. Pediatrics, 70(5), 769773.
123
457
Gueorguieva, R., Carter, R., Ariet, M., Roth, J., Mahan, C., & Resnick M. (2001). Effect of teenage
pregnancy on educational disabilities in kindergarten. American Journal of Epidemiology, 154,
212220.
Harris, K. M. (1996). Life after welfare: Women, work, and repeat dependency. American Sociological
Review, 61, 407426.
Hayes, H., Luchok, K., Martin, A. B., McKeown, R. E., & Evans, A. (2006). Short birth intervals and the
risk of school unreadiness among a medicaid population in South Carolina. Child: Care, Health and
Development, 32(4), 423430.
Heaman, M., Chalmers, K., Woodgate, R., & Brown, J. (2006). Early childhood home visiting
programme: Factors contributing to success. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 55(3), 291300.
Horwitz, S. M., Klerman, L. V., Kuo, H. S., & Jekel, J. F. (1991). School age mothers: Predictors of longterm educational and economic outcomes. Pediatrics, 87, 862868.
Key, J. D., Gebregziabher, M. G., Marsh, L. D., & ORourke, K. M. (2008). Effectiveness of an intensive,
school-based intervention for teen mothers. Journal of Adolescent Health, 42, 394400.
Kitzman, H., Olds, D. L., Henderson, C. R., Hank, C., Cole, R., Tatelbaum, R., et al. (1997). Effect of
prenatal and infancy home visitation by nurses on pregnancy outcomes, childhood injuries, and
repeated childbearing: A randomized controlled trial. The Journal of the American Medical
Association, 278(8), 644652.
Klerman, L. V. (2004). Another chance: Preventing additional births to teen mothers. Washington, DC:
National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy.
Klerman, L. V., Baker, B. A., & Howard, G. (2003). Second births among teenage mothers: Program
results and statistical methods. Journal of Adolescent Health, 32, 452455.
Koniak-Griffin, D., Anderson, N., Brecht, M., Verzemnieks, I., Lesser, J., & Kim, S. (2002). Public health
nursing care for adolescent mothers: Impact on infant health and selected maternal outcomes at
1 year postbirth. Journal of Adolescent Health, 30(1), 4454.
Koniak-Griffin, D., Verzemnieks, I., Anderson, N., Brecht, M., Lesser, J., Kim, S., et al. (2003). Nurse
visitation for adolescent mothers: Two-year infant health and maternal outcomes. Nursing Research,
52(2), 127136.
Malamitsi-Puchner, A., & Boutsikou, T. (2006). Adolescent pregnancy and perinatal outcome. Pediatric
Endocrinology Reviews, 3(1), 170171.
Manlove, J., Mariner, C., & Papillo, A. R. (2000). Subsequent fertility among teen mothers: Longitudinal
analyses of recent national data. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 430448.
Maynard, R. (Ed.) (1996). Kids having kids: A Robin Hood Foundation special report on the costs of
adolescent childbearing. New York: The Robin Hood Foundation.
Menacker, F., Martin, J. A., MacDorman, M. F., & Ventura, S. J. (2004). Births to 1014 year-old
mothers, 19902002: Trends and health outcomes. National vital statistics reports: From the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. National Vital Statistics
System, 53(7), 118.
Miller, J. E. (1991). Birth intervals and perinatal health: An investigation of three hypotheses. Family
Planning Perspectives, 23, 6270.
Moore, K. A., Driscoll, A. K., & Lindberg, L. D. (1998). A statistical portrait of adolescent sex,
contraception, and childbearing. Washington, DC: National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy.
Murphy, S., Orkow, B., & Nicola, R. (1985). Prenatal prediction of child abuse and neglect: A
prospective study. Child Abuse and Neglect, 9, 225235.
Nathens, A. B., Neff, M., Goss, C., Maier, R., & Rivara, F. (2000). Effect of an older sibling and birth
interval on the risk of childhood injury. Injury Prevention: Journal of the International Society for
Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention, 6(3), 219222.
Norr, K., Crittenden, K., Lehrer, E., Reyes, O., Boyd, C., Nacion, K., et al. (2003). Maternal and infant
outcomes at one year for a Nurse-Health Advocate Home Visiting Program serving AfricanAmericans and Mexican-Americans. Public Health Nursing, 20(3), 190203.
Olds, D. L. (2002). Prenatal and infancy home visiting by nurses: From randomized trials to community
replication. Prevention Science, 3(3), 153172.
Olds, D., Henderson, C., Kitzman, H., Eckenrode, J., Cole, R., & Tatelbaum, R. (1998). The promise of
home visitation: Results of two randomized trials. Journal of Community Psychology, 26(1), 521.
Olds, D. L., Henderson, C. R., Tatelbaum, R., & Chamberlin, R. (1988). Improving the life-course
development of socially disadvantaged mothers: A randomized trial of nurse home visitation.
American Journal of Public Health, 78, 14361445.
123
458
M. Ownbey et al.
Omar, H. A., Fowler, A., & McClanahan, K. K. (2008). Significant reduction of repeat teen pregnancy in
a comprehensive young parent program. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 21,
283287.
Orkow, B. (1985). Implementation of a family stress checklist. Child Abuse and Neglect, 9, 405410.
Petersen, R., Albright, J., Garrett, J., & Curtis, K. (2007). Pregnancy and STD prevention counseling
using an adaptation of motivational interviewing: A randomized controlled trial. Perspectives on
Sexual and Reproductive Health, 39(1), 2128.
Powell, B., & Steelman, L. C. (1990). Beyond sibship size: Sibling density, sex composition, and
educational outcomes. Sociological Forces, 69, 181206.
Powell, B., & Steelman, L. (1993). The educational benefits of being spaced out: Sibship density and
educational progress. American Sociological Review, 58(3), 367381.
Reime, B., Schucking, B. A., & Wenzlaff, P. (2008). Reproductive outcomes in adolescents who had a
previous birth or an induced abortion compared to adolescents first pregnancies. BMC Pregnancy
Childbirth, 8, 4.
Rutter, M., & OConnor, T. (1999). Implications of attachment theory for child care policies. In J.
Cassidy & P. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research and clinical applications.
New York: Guilford Press.
Sangalang, B., Barth, R., & Painter, J. (2006). First-birth outcomes and timing of second births: A
statewide case management program for adolescent mothers. Health and Social Work, 31(1), 5463.
Smith, G. C. S., & Pell, J. P. (2001). Teenage Pregnancy and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes
associated with first and second births: Population based retrospective cohort study. British Medical
Journal, 323, 476481.
Smits, L., Pedersen, C., Mortensen, P., & van Os, J. (2004). Association between birth intervals and
schizophrenia in the offspring. Schizophrenia Research, 70, 4956.
Sprang, G., Clark, J., & Bass, S. (2005). Factors that contribute to child maltreatment severity: A multimethod and multidimensional investigation. Child Abuse and Neglect, 29(4), 335350.
Sroufe, L., Carlson, E., Levy, A., & Egeland, B. (1999). Implications of attachment theory for
developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 11, 113.
Steelman, L. C., Powell, B., Werum, R., & Carter, S. (2002). Reconsidering the effects of sibling
configuration: Recent advances and challenges. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 243269.
Stevens-Simon, C., Kelly, L., & Singer, D. (1991). Preventing repeat adolescent pregnancies with early
adoption of the contraceptive implant. Family Planning Perspectives, 31(2), 8893.
Stevens-Simon, C., Nelligan, D., & Kelly, L. (2001). Adolescents at risk for mistreating their children.
Part II: A home- and clinic-based prevention program. Child Abuse and Neglect, 25(6), 753769.
Stewart, J., & Dooley, M. (1999). The duration of spells on welfare and off welfare among lone mothers
in Ontario. Canadian Public Policy, 25, 4772.
Stewart, R., Mobley, L., Van Tuyl, S., & Salvador, M. (1987). The firstborns adjustment to the birth of a
sibling: A longitudinal assessment. Child Development, 58(2), 341355.
Todoroff, K., & Shaw, G. M. (2000). Prior spontaneous abortion, prior elective termination,
interpregnancy interval, and risk of neural tube defects. American Journal of Epidemiology,
151(5), 505511.
Trause, M. (1978). Birth in the hospital: The effect on the sibling. Birth & the Family Journal, 5(4),
207210.
U. S. Census Bureau. (2000). Fact sheet: Burke county, North Carolina. Retrieved January 6, 2010 from
http://factfinder.census.gov.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2000). Family planning. In: Healthy people 2010:
Understanding and improving health (2nd ed.) Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Retrieved November 19, 2008 http://www.health.gov/healthypeople.
Zajonc, R. B. (2001). The family dynamics of intellectual development. American Psychologist, 56,
490496.
Zhu, B., Rolfs, R. T., Nangle, B. E., & Horan, J. M. (1999). Effect of the interval between pregnancies on
perinatal outcomes. The New England Journal of Medicine, 340(8), 589594.
Zhu, B., Rolfs, R. T., Nangle, B. E., & Horan, J. M. (2001). Effect of interval between pregnancies on
perinatal outcomes among white and black women. American Journal of Obstetrics and
Gynecology, 185, 14031410.
Zuravin, S. (1988). Fertility patterns: Their relationship to child physical abuse and child neglect. Journal
of Marriage & the Family, 50(4), 983993.
123
Copyright of Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal is the property of Springer Science & Business Media
B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright
holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.