Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
'
CHAPT ER III,
BY FR ..t\.NKLIN
JOHNSON,
D. D.), LL. D~
i
1
DEFINITION
,(
48
49
But, as the higher critics con tradict tl1e testim ony 0 all the
He brew historic documents which profess to be early, their
theory might better be called the ''u11historic view.'' The higher criticism has sometimes been called the ''documentary l1ypothesis." But as all schoo,ls of criti.cism and all doctrin,es of
e inspiration are equally h.ospitable to the sqpposition that tl1e
t biblical writers may have consulted documents, and may have
~ quoted them, the higher criticism ha s no special right to thi s
title. We must fall back, therefore, upon the name ''the high1 er criticism'' as the very best at our disposal, and upon the
t definition of it as chiefly an inspectio ,n of literary productions
in order to ascertain their dates, . their authors, and their value,
as they tl1emselves,. inte rpr eted in the light of the hypothesis
, of evolution, may yield the evidence.
iJ
I turn 110w to ask what the higher critics p,rof ess to have
1
found out by this method of study . The ''assured resuits'' on
' which they congratulate tl1emselves are stated variously. In
radical than that given the m in Germany, though sufficiently
J, startling and destructive to arouse vigorous protest and a vig' orous demand for the evidences, which, as we shall see, have
' not been produced and cannot he produ ced. Tl1e less star tling
~ form of the ''assured results'' usually announced in England
' tty in these countries. Yet it should be noticed that there are
higher critics in this country and England who go beyond the
. principal "German representatives of the school in their zeal
' for the dethronement of the Old Testament and the New, in so
far as the se holy books are presented to the world as the very
: Word of God, as a special revelation from heaven.
' The following statement from Zenos* may ser-ve to introduce us to the more moderate form of the ''assuied results''
*Page 205.
50
51
52
TJze Fundamentals.
is, after all, one book. But the limits of the Old Testament
have long since been overpassed by the higher critics, and it is
demanded of us that we abandon the in1memorial teaching of
the church concerning the entire volume. The picture of
Christ which tl1e New Testa1nent sets before us is in many
respects mistaken. The doctrines of primitive Christianity
wl1ich it states and def e11ds were ,vell enougl1 for the time,
but have no value for us today except as they commend
themselves to our independent judgment.
Its moral precepts
are fallible, and v.re should accept them or reject them freely,
in accordance with the greater light of the twentieth century .
Even Christ could err concerning ethical qttestions, and neitl1er
His commandments nor His example need constrain us.
FIRST FALLACY:
THE ANALYSIS
OF THE PEITTATEUCH .
I. The first fallacy that I shall bring forward is its analysis of the Pentateuch.
54
The Fitndamentals.
'
AP-
t~agina ry.
,
1''Die Biblische The ,ologie Wissenschaftlich Dargestellt.
2''Bib 'lical Critici sn1 and Modern Tl1,ought,'' T .. and 'T. Cla,rk,, 1909,
,I
..
55
THlRD FALLACY:
*'~H1
st ory o f
c1,v1"l'1zat101n
..
1
11
E ng 1an d-.''
.56
FOURTH FALLACY:
IV.
57
impression that the writers who reco ,rd the birth of Cnrist
were influenced by these fables to emulate th.em, and thus to
secure for Him the honor of a celestial paternity.
It turns
out, however, that these pagan fables do not in any case pre sent to us a virgin mother; the cl1ild is alwa,ys the product
of commerce with a god who assumes a ht1man form for the
1
purposle. The d espair , of the higl1er criti .cs in t'his hunt for
events of the same kind is well illus ,trated by Ch e,yne,* who
cites tl1e record of the Babylonian king Sargon, about 3,800
B. C. This monarch represe11ts himself as having ''been born
of a poor mother in secret, and as not knowing his father."
There have been many millions of such instances, but we do
Nor does the BaDynot think of the mother ~ as virgins.
lo,nian story affirm that the mother of Sargon was a virgi11,
Oir ~ven that his fath er was a, g od. It is plain that Sargon
did not intend to claim a supernatural origin, for, after saying that he ''did . not know his father, '' he adds that ''the
brother of his f.ather Jived in the rt1ountains.'' It was a case
1
,r
58
like n1uttitudes of others in "vhich childrer1, early orpl1an,ed,
have not known their fathers, bttt hav e known tl1e relation9
This statement of Sargon I quote f1om a
of tl1eir fathers.
tran slation of it n1ade by Cheyne himself in the ''Encycle:r
pedia Biblica.'' He continue s, ''There is reas.on to , suspect that
something similar was originally sa id by the Israelites of
Mose s.' ' To substantiate this he add , ''Se e Encyclopedia Biblica, 'Moses,.' section 3 with note 4.." On turni11g to this ref.erence t~e reader fi11ds
. t'hat the .article was written by Cheyne
himself,, and that it contain s 110 evidence whatever. ,
1
FIFTH
FALLA CY:
1
- -----=--~
--
--
------ - - - -
--- -
59
II
*''Light
1
ti,on.
...
I
I
61
Amraphel came back from tl1e g1aveas a real historical characte.r,, beari ng,l1iscode of laws. They were sho cke.d wl1en the .stele
of the Pharaoh of the eX.Odus was read, a11dit was proved that
he knew a people called Israel, that they had no settled place
of abode, that t]1ey were ''without grain'' for food, and that
in these particulars they were quite as they are represented by
the S,criptures to l1ave been wl1en tl1ey had fled from Egypt
into the wilderness.* Tl1e embarrassment created by these
discoveries 'is manifest in many o.f the recent writings of the
higher critics, in which, however, tl1ey still cling heroically to
their analysis and their late dating of the Pentateuch and their
confidence, in the hypo ,t'hes.is of' evolution as tl1e key of al l
history.
.
1
SIXTH
FALLACY:
THE
PSALMS WRITTEN
EXILE.
AFTER
THE
.,
62
,,
..
t]1e
63
-~
--
T.lie Fu1idamentals.
in all his I.ater experiences, a.nd his ass,ociati ons with: nol
pr:iests and prophets? He was certainly teac hable: did G
f Ml to make use of him in further revealing Himself to Hi
peo_ple 1 1:o deny these Psalms to David on the giound of h'.i
limited vieWs of God ill his early life, is this not te deny th.a
God ma.de sucaessive revelations of Himself wher.e~er He
found suitable channels?- If., further, we consider the unq.uestioned skill of E>avid in -tl1e, music of his, nation and nis age
( I. Sam. 16 :14-2 5), this will consti tuie a Presupposition in
favor of his interest in sacred song. If, finally, we consider
his personal career of danger and deli\'erance, this will appear
a~. the natural means of awakening in hill:}the spirit of varied
religious poetry, FI.is. times were much like the Elizabethan
~ried, which ministerecl unexampled stimulus to the English
min&
From all thi~ we may; turn to the singIar \i!eri
'dict of Professor ~orel:an: ''if ' a man says he cannot see why D,avid could
not hae written Psalms 51 and 139, you are compe)led to r~ly
as politely as possible that if he did write tnem: then any man
,can write anything.'' So also w:e may say, ''as politely as po-ssiale,'' tnat it Shakespeare, witn his ''sm:tll Latin and les.s
Greek,'' did write ]1is incomparaole dran1as, ''then any man
can write anything' ' ; that if Bickens, witn his mere elementary education, did write his great nove,Is, '' then any man can
w1iteanything''; ,and tnat if Linooln, who had no early school
ing, did write his Ciettysburg address, ''then any ran can wnite
anything.''
SEVENTif F'ALLACY:
DEUTERONOMY N0 :F WR1TTEN B~
MOSES.
1
65
all of which c
(
1J
NO i
vrn :.
now:
67
of B
.
. 0
aal or of Chemosh ; 1t was certai nly not worthy of the
dishonor
them
when
.
w
e
attribute
~rophets
of
Jehovah
and
we
1t to '
. them and place tl1em upon a Jow plane oii craft and cun. i
'
at1
r1st1an faith.
. B ,. .
NO MIDDLE GROUN.D. .
.lt u~ lll1ght
we
11ot
accept
a
part
of
this
system
of
thought
.
.
'
2.
APPEND IX.
ORR.
It.
MOLLER.
SCHMAUK.
CROSLEGH.
GREEN.
CHAMBERS .
BLO~IFIELD.
RAVEN.
S YCE.