Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
One of the earliest and most critical tasks in a submarine pipeline planning exercise is the route
selection.[5] This selection has to consider a variety of issues, some of a political nature, but most
others dealing with geohazards, physical factors along the prospective route, and other uses of
the seabed in the area considered.[5][6] This task begins with a fact-finding exercise, which is a
standard desk study that includes a survey of geological maps, bathymetry, fishing charts, aerial
and satellite photography, as well as information from navigation authorities.[5][6]
Physical factors
Interaction between a submarine pipeline and the seabed onto which it rests (four possible
scenarios).
The primary physical factor to be considered in submarine pipeline construction is the state of
the seabed whether it is smooth (i.e., relatively flat) or uneven (corrugated, with high points
and low points). If it is uneven, the pipeline will include free spans when it connects two high
points, leaving the section in between unsupported.[2][7] If an unsupported section is too long, the
bending stress exerted onto it (due to its weight) may be excessive. Vibration from currentinduced vortexes may also become an issue.[7][8] Corrective measures for unsupported pipeline
spans include seabed leveling and post-installation support, such as berm or sand infilling below
the pipeline. The strength of the seabed is another significant parameter. If the soil is not strong
enough, the pipeline may sink into it to an extent where inspection, maintenance procedures and
prospective tie-ins become difficult to carry out. At the other extreme, a rocky seabed is
expensive to trench and, at high points, abrasion and damage of the pipeline's external coating
may occur.[7][8] Ideally, the soil should be such as to allow the pipe to settle into it to some extent,
thereby providing it with some lateral stability.[7]
One of a number of reasons why submarine pipelines are buried below the seabed: to protect
them against the gouging action of drifting ice features, such as icebergs.
Other physical factors to be taken into account prior to building a pipeline include the following:
[2][7][8][9][10]
Seabed mobility: Sandwaves and megaripples are features that move with time, such that
a pipeline that was supported by the crest of one such feature during construction may
find itself in a trough later during the pipelines operational lifespan. The evolution of
these features is difficult to predict so it is preferable to avoid the areas where they are
known to exist.
Submarine landslides: They result from high sedimentation rates and occur on steeper
slopes. They can be triggered by earthquakes. When the soil around the pipe is subjected
to a slide, especially if the resulting displacement is at high angle to the line, the pipe
within it can incur severe bending and consequent tensile failure.
Currents: High currents are objectionable in that they hinder pipe laying operations. For
instance, in shallow seas tidal currents may be quite strong in a straight between two
islands. Under these circumstances, it may be preferable to bring the pipe elsewhere, even
if this alternative route ends up being longer.
Waves: In shallow waters, waves can also be problematic for pipeline laying operations
(in severe wave regimes) and, subsequently, to its stability, because of the waters
scouring action. This is one of a number of reasons why landfalls (where the pipeline
reaches the shoreline) are particularly delicate areas to plan.
Ice-related issues: In freezing waters, floating ice features often drift into shallower
waters, and their keel comes into contact with the seabed. As they continue to drift, they
gouge the seabed and can hit the pipeline.[11] Stamukhi can also damage this structure,
either by exerting high local stresses on it or by causing to soil around it to fail, thereby
inducing excessive bending. Strudel are another pipeline hazard in cold waters water
gushing through them can remove the soil from below the structure, making it vulnerable
to overstress (due to self-weight) or vortex-induced oscillations. Pipeline route planning
for areas where these risks are known to exist has to consider laying the pipeline in a
back-filled trench.
Other pipelines: If and where the proposed pipeline intersects an existing one, which is
not uncommon, a bridging structure may be required at that juncture in order to cross it.
This has to be done at a right angle. The juncture should be carefully designed so as to
avoid interferences between the two structures either by direct physical contact or due to
hydrodynamic effects.
Fishing vessels: Commercial fishing makes use of heavy fishing nets dragged on the
seabed and extending several kilometers behind the trawler. This net could snag the
pipeline, with potential damage to both pipeline and vessel.
Ship anchors: Ship anchors are a potential threat to pipelines, especially near harbors.
Military activities: Some areas still have mines originating from former conflicts but that
are still operational. Other areas, used for bombing or gunning practices, may also
conceal live ammunition. Moreover, at some locations, various types of instrumentation
are laid on the seafloor for submarine detection. These areas have to be avoided.
Pipeline construction
Pipeline construction involves two procedures: assembling a large number of pipe segments into
a full line, and installing that line along the desired route. Several systems can be used for a
submarine pipeline, the choice in favor of any one of them is based on the following factors:
physical and environmental conditions (e.g. currents, wave regime), availability of equipment
and costs, water depth, pipeline length and diameter, constraints tied to the presence of other
lines and structures along the route.[2] These systems are generally divided into four broad
categories: pull/tow, S-lay, J-lay and reel-lay.[15][16][17][18]
Simplified drawings showing three configurations used to tow subsea pipelines offshore to the
planned installation site (not to scale).
Surface tow: In this configuration, the pipeline remains at the surface of the water during
tow, and is then sunk into position at lay site. The line has to be buoyant this can be
done with individual buoyancy units attached to it.[19] Surface tows are not appropriate for
rough seas and are vulnerable to lateral currents.
Near-surface tow: The pipeline remains below the water surface but close to it this
mitigates wave action. But the spar buoys used to maintain the line at that level are
affected by rough seas, which in itself may represent a challenge for the towing
operation.
Mid-depth tow: The pipeline is not buoyant either because it is heavy or it is weighted
down by hanging chains. In this configuration, the line is suspended in a catenary
between two towing vessels. The shape of that catenary (the sag) is a balance between the
lines weight, the tension applied to it by the vessels and hydrodynamic lift on the chains.
[22]
The amount of allowable sag is limited by how far down the seabed is.
Off-bottom tow: This configuration is similar to the mid-depth tow, but here the line is
maintained within 1 to 2 m (several feet) away from the bottom, using chains dragging on
the seabed.
Bottom tow: In this case, the pipeline is dragged onto the bottom the line is not affected
by waves and currents, and if the sea gets too rough for the tow vessel, the line can
simply be abandoned and recovered later. Challenges with this type of system include:
requirement for an abrasion-resistant coating, interaction with other submarine pipelines
and potential obstructions (reef, boulders, etc.). Bottom tow is commonly used for river
crossings and crossings between shores.[23]
Simplified drawings of three common systems used for the construction and installation of
subsea pipelines (not to scale): S-lay, J-lay and reel.
The DCV Aegir, a pipelay vessel designed for J-lay and reel-lay.
The Saipem 7000, a semi-submersible crane vessel equipped with a J-lay pipe-laying system.
lay-barge, is better suited for deep water environments. In this system, the pipeline leaves the
vessel on a nearly vertical ramp (or tower). There is no overbend only a sagbend of catenary
nature (hence the J notation), such that the tension can be reduced. The pipeline is also less
exposed to wave action as it enters the water.[28] However, unlike for the S-lay system, where
pipe welding can be done simultaneously at several locations along the vessel decks length, the
J-lay system can only accommodate one welding station. Advanced methods of automatic
welding are used to compensate for this drawback.[29]