OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (OPCR)

I, FELOMINO P. ALBA, of the Institute of Teacher Education and Information Technology , Malita Campus commit to deliver and agree to be rated on the attai
following targets in accordance with the indicated measures for the period JANUARY 2016 - JUNE 2016.

Approved by:

Approved by:
IRVIN C. GENERALAO, Ph.D
SUC President

Major Final Output

Success indicators (Targets + Measures

STRATEGIC FUNCTIONS:

1. Accreditation of IT Level 2
1.a prepared OBE accreditation
10 areas

documents in

1.b subjected OBP documents for IAB evaluation

1.c subjected OBP documents for self-survey
1.e prepared PPP for 10 areas
1.f participated in the AACCUP accreditation
survey visit

organized OBP accreditation documents in 10 areas with minor

modifications prior to actual accreditation
100% compliance to recommendations of IAB evaluators prior
to actual accreditation
100% of OBP accreditation areas surveyed with minor
modification prior to actual accreditation
100% PPP submitted to overall accreditation coordinator with
no error prior to actual accreditation
100 % of area leaders participated in the AACCUP accreditation
survey visit

Allotted Budget (detailed

budget attached as
Annex A)

3. CHED Compliance for BSIT

3.a reviewed and evaluated CHED compliance
documents

100% documents reviewed and evaluated with minimal lacking

documents prior to submissionto CHED

Hosting senior high school (K-12)

Increased enrolment by 5%
National Certification II for CSS
CORE FUNCTIONS
Designations (Refer to SO Dept Chair, TESDA Coordinator
a. INSTRUCTION
6 meetings conducted w/ minutes and attendance sheet
1. Department Heads Meeting
attached
100% class schedules finalized and submitted w/o error 10 WDs
2. Faculty Assignments and Class Scheduling
before the start of classes
100% school requirements and reports submitted w/o error 10
3. Submission of school requirements and reports
WDs before the deadline
4. Preparation of Activity Design
5. Submission of Budget Proposal, quarterly and
annual report submitted
6.Procurement Plan preparation
8. Classes Observation Undertaken
9. Faculty Evaluation
10. Teaching Performance evaluation submitted
11. Class schedule and consultation posted

100% Activity design approved 20 WDs days before the activity

budget proposal; quarterly and annual reports submitted
complete and w/o revision 7WDs before the deadline
3 Procurement Plan preparation finalized and approved
complete w/o revision 10 WDs before the deadline
100% Class Observation report submitted w/o error 7WDs
before deadline
100% Complete Faculty evaluation finalized and submitted w/o
revision 7WDs before the deadline
100% teaching performance evaluation submitted 2 weeks
after the end of the semester w/ 1 error
4 Class shedule and consultation posted w/o revision 1 month
after the start of classes

12. TOS and periodic test collated

97 of OBE syllabus collated by department 14WDs after the

start of the clases
97 of TOS and periodic test collated by department 7WDs
before the exam

13. Report of grades collated

97 ROG collated w/ no error 3WDs before the deadline

11. OBE syllabi collated

14. Workloads collated

15. Class Schedule collated

30 Workloads collated w/ no error 7WDs after the start of the

class
30 Class schedule collated w/ no error 7WDs after the start of
the class

14. OJT of students monitored

b. RESEARCH

100% of the students deployed and monitored

1. Monitored graduating students thesis/capstone

outline defense
2. 4 recommended research papers for paper
presentation

100% of the applicants for thesis/capstone monitored in the IT

Department

3. 1 online publication per program

1 online publications (refereed)

1 recommended research paper presented

c. EXTENSION
1. 1 Attended Extension program formulated/
developed for the ITEIT
125 beneficiaries trained/served/capacitated by the Institute
d. PRODUCTION
Testing of Systems Program for Research Information
System
100% of system features presented
Testing of SPAMAST Examination Management
System
100% of system features presented
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS

a. DTR with MPOR prepared and submitted

DTR with MPOR and complete attachments prepared and

submitted end of the month w/o error 5WDs after the end of
the preceding month.

b. IPCR submitted

2 signed IPCRs (accomplishment for the first rating period and

targets for the second rating period) submitted w/o error 7WDs
before the deadline set by the PMT

c. OPCR submitted
d. Certificate of Travel Completed (CTC) Submission
e. Back to Station Report Submitted
f. Itinerary of Travel Submission
g. Travel Order Submission

2 signed OPCRs (accomplishment for the first rating period and

targets for the second rating period) submitted w/o error 7WDs
before the deadline set by the PMT
100% Certificate of travel completed (CTC) submitted w/in 2
WDs after travel
100% BTSR submitted w/ complete attachments w/ no error
within 2WDs after travel
100% Itinerary of Trave Submitted w/no error w/in 2WDs after
travel

f. Monthly Accomplishment Report Submission

100% TO submitted within 2WDs after travel with no error

6 Monthly Accomplishment Report submitted w/ no error 5WDs
after the eom

g. SALN submitted

1 SALN submitted 3 WDs before 30th day of April

h. Cedula Submitted

1 Cedula Sbmitted 3WDs before 15th day of January

i. Updated PDS submitted

1 Udated PDS submitted 3WDs before 15th day of April

j. Clearance submitted

1 Clearance for faculty submitted 7WDs before 15th day of May.

100% of flag raising and lowering ceremonies attended with no
complaint/negative observation as scheduled.
100% of convocation programs attended with no
complaint/negative observation as scheduled.
NBC 461 documents submitted with complete attachments
3WDs before the deadline.

k. Attendance to Flag Ceremonies

l. Attendance to Convocation Program
m. NBC 461 submitted

Comments and Recommendations for Development Purposes

Average Rating
CAT E G O R Y
Strategic Priorities
Core Functions
Support Functions
Total
Adj. Rating
Discussed with

Date

Assessed by
I certify that I discussed my
assessment of the
performance with the
employee

FELOMINO P. ALBA, MIM

SEVILLA C. YOBUENO, PH.D

Employee:
LEGEND:
1- Quantity

Supervisor
3- Timeliness

2- Efficiency

EW (OPCR)

be rated on the attaintment of the

FELOMINO P. ALBA, MIM

Head of Office
Date: _______________

Rating
Score

Date:

Department/
Individual
Accountable

Actual
Accomplishments
Expenses

Rating

Dean,All Faculty in IT
Dept.
All Faculty in the IT
All Faculty in the IT
All Faculty in the IT
All Faculty in the IT
Dean,All Faculty in IT
Dept.

5-Outstanding
4-Very Satisfactory
3-Satisfactory
2-Unsatisfactory
1-Poor
Remarks

Dean,All Faculty in IT
Dept.

K-12 Committee

J. Mebolos / IT Faculty

Faculty in the IT w/
designations

F. Alba
F. Alba / All IT Faculty
F. Alba / All IT Faculty
F. Alba / All IT Faculty
F. Alba / All IT Faculty
F. Alba / All IT Faculty
F. Alba / All IT Faculty
F. Alba / All IT Faculty
F. Alba / All IT Faculty
F. Alba / All IT Faculty

F. Alba / All IT Faculty

F. Alba / All IT Faculty
F. Alba / All IT Faculty

F. Alba / All IT Faculty

F. Alba / All IT Faculty
F. Alba / All IT Faculty

F. Alba / All IT Faculty

F. Alba / All IT Faculty

F. Alba / All IT Faculty

F. Alba / All IT Faculty

F. Alba / All IT Faculty

F. Alba / All IT Faculty

All Faculty in the IT

All Faculty in the IT

All Faculty in the IT

All Faculty in the IT
All Faculty in the IT
All Faculty in the IT
All Faculty in the IT
All Faculty in the IT
All Faculty in the IT
All Faculty in the IT
All Faculty in the IT
All Faculty in the IT
All Faculty in the IT
All Faculty in the IT
F. Alba / J.Mebolos

Date

Final Rating by

IRVIN C. GENERALAO, PH.D

Head of Office

4- Average

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (IPCR)

I, JAYF T. MANGANSAKAN of the SPAMAST - Institute of Teacher Education and Information Technology, Malita campus commit to deliver and agree to be rated on
the attaintment of the following targets in accordance with the indicated measures for the period JANUARY 2016 to JUNE 2016.

Reviewed by:

Date:

Approved by:

RUTH S. LUCERO, Ph.D.

Immediate Supervisor

Output

Date:

SEVILLA C. YOBUENO, PhD

Head of Office
Success Indicators
(Targets + Measures)

Actual Accomplishments

Rating
E(1)

STRATEGIC PRIORITY:

CORE FUNCTIONS:(47%)
a. INSTRUCTION
Workload submitted
Class Schedule Submitted
Summary of Workload Submitted
OBE Syllabus Submitted
TOS with exam submitted
Report of Grades (ROG)

1 workload submitted w/o error7WDs after the

start of classes
1 class schedule submitted w/o error 7WDs
after the start of classes
1 summary workload submitted w/o error
7WDs after the start of classes
4 OBE syllabus submitted w/o 7WDs after the
start of classes
8 TOS with exam submitted w/o 7WDs before
the exam
4 ROG submitted w/o 3WDs before te
deadline

Q(2)

T(3)

Class Record
b. DESIGNATION (33%)

3. SPMS seminar facilitated

2 class record submitted w/0 3WDs before the

deadline
2 SPMS IMPLEMENTATION seminar w/
complete documentation before end of
August 2015 facilitated

SUPPORT FUNCTIONS: (20%)

a. DTR

b. IPCR

6 DTR submitted w/o error 1-2 WDs after the

end of the month
1 IPCR submitted w/o error 7WDs before the
deadline

with 2 minor revisions

g. Clearance

1 Duly signed clearance submitted w/o error

7WDs before the deadline

h. Attendance to Flag Ceremonies

100% of flag raising and lowering ceremonies

attended with no complaint/negative
observation as scheduled.

i. Attendance to Convocation Program

100% of convocation programs attended with

no complaint/negative observation as
scheduled.

j. Attendance to wellness dance

100% of wellness dance attended with no

complaint/negative observation as scheduled.

k. Attendance to LGU
facilitated/iniatated programs and
activities re: Gaginaway, Araw ng
Davao Occidental, Malita, Clean-up
drive, WAM, WED and the like.

100% of LGU facilitated/initiated programs

attended with minimal absenteeism.

Comments and Recommendations for Development Purposes

Average Rating
CATEGORY
Strategic Priorities
Core Functions
Support Functions
Total
Adj. Rating
Discussed with
Date

JAYF T. MANGANSAKAN
Employee
LEGEND:

1- Efficiency

Assessed by
I certify that I discussed my assessment of
the performance with the employee RUTH
S. LUCERO, PhD

Date

Supervisor
2- Quality

3- Timeliness

4- Average

FORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (IPCR)

mation Technology, Malita campus commit to deliver and agree to be rated on

Edna A.Cenita, MS
Ratee
Date

Rating

Remarks
A(4)

Date

Final Rating by
SEVILLA C. YOBUENO, PhD

Head of Office
4- Average