Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME198
480
FIRST DIVISION.
481
481
1/8
12/5/2015
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME198
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001516ded63d5fd137d12003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
2/8
12/5/2015
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME198
482
3/8
12/5/2015
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME198
_______________
1
483
4/8
12/5/2015
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME198
_______________
2
Rollo, p. 62.
Decision
penned
by
Commissioner
Rustico
L.
Diokno
with
484
Affirming
that finding, we said in Republic vs. Court of
6
Appeals as follows:
Since NPDC is a government agency, its employees are covered by
civil service rules and regulations (Sec. 2, Article IX, 1987
Constitution). Its employees are civil service employees (Sec. 14,
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001516ded63d5fd137d12003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
5/8
12/5/2015
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME198
485
485
6/8
12/5/2015
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME198
486
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001516ded63d5fd137d12003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
7/8
12/5/2015
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME198
Melchor, 101 Phil. 857 (1977) Salcedo v. C.A., 81 SCRA 408 (1978)
Gementiza v. C.A., 113 SCRA 477 (1982) Laganapan v. Asedillo, 154
SCRA 377 (1987) and Antiporda v. Ticao, 160 SCRA 40 (1968) where,
reinstatement no longer being feasible, payment to a dismissed civil
service employee of back wages equivalent to five (5) years pay without
qualification or deduction was declared adequate remedy in the premises.
487
487
Copyright2015CentralBookSupply,Inc.Allrightsreserved.
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001516ded63d5fd137d12003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
8/8