Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
CONTENTS
1. Introduction
2. Hybrid DG System
3. Control Strategies of HS
4. Simulated and Experimental Results and Discussion
5. Conclusion
Acknowledgments
References
Appendix A
AbstractThis article addresses power quality improvement in a 3 grid-connected photovoltaicfuel cell based hybrid system using
hybrid filter topology. In the context of the extraction of maximum
power due to the uncertainty of solar insolation and temperature in
the hybrid system, backstepping control is addressed for the DCDC boost converter. A space vector pulse-width modulation control
technique is implemented for the voltage source inverter for the grid
integration objective. Compensation of the distorted waveform at the
point of common coupling is accomplished by a suitable controller
design using the hybrid filter. The series of simulation results in MATLAB environment (The MathWorks, Natick, Massachusetts, USA)
followed by prototype experimental validation reflects the superiority
of the proposed controllers to achieve power quality improvements.
1.
INTRODUCTION
2236
NOMENCLATURE
A
diode ideality factor of photovoltaic cell
d
duty cycle of boost converter
E0
reversible cell potential in fuel cell
photovoltaic current
I ph
diode saturation current of photovoltaic cell
Is
I p , V p output voltage and current of photovoltaic array
fuel cell stack current
Ifc
L , I L boost converter inductance and current across inductor
Np
Ns
p
Rsh
Rs
uc
Vba
Vf
uninterruptable power supply. Thus, the PV-FC with the integration of a BESS is integrated as an HS that is connected to the
DC bus. Further, at the point of common coupling (PCC), the
linear and non-linear loads are connected, for which the issue
of PQ in the distribution system is a concern. The increasing
application of power converters and DG has heightened the interest in PQ in recent years, and the mitigation objective with
various filter designs has been addressed in the literature.
DG systems comprised of PV and FCs are mostly based on
grid-connected converters as an interface between the source
and the grid. They require a suitable control strategy to be
designed to guarantee system stability and reliability. PQ mitigation [10] exploits the capabilities of the DC/AC converter
in a renewable power generation system, which is based on the
space vector theory, and analysis is confirmed by computer
simulation results. The work in [11] focused on steady-state
PQ issues in which the harmonic load flow program was implemented in symmetrical components to investigate the influence
of several control strategies in a single-phase inverter. The influence of single-phase DG units in the three-phase four-wire
distribution network is discussed by use of statistical indices
that combine power system unbalance and the existing harmonics.
Paulillo et al. [12] and other research [13, 14] presented the
use of an FC-based DG system to investigate the aspects related
to PQ, especially harmonic and voltage imbalances. A small
single-phase FC-based energy generation and compensation
system was proposed in [15]; that system was suggested as
reliable for residential applications and improved the PQ even
in a weak power grid.
The use of distributed static compensator (DSTATCOM)
systems as a compensator operating in current control mode
is addressed to improve PQ in low-voltage distribution grids
[16]. A hybrid PQ solution in a test system consisting of distributed passive filters, a universal PQ conditioner (UPQC),
and DG units was presented in [17]. In this system, single
passive filters were designed and connected to eliminate main
Patra et al.: Power Quality Improvement in Grid-connected PhotovoltaicFuel Cell Based Hybrid System
2237
2.
FIGURE 1. Proposed HS.
HYBRID DG SYSTEM
The robustness problem of PV systems for parameter uncertainty can be alleviated by its integration with other energy
sources, such as with an FC to form an HS as shown in Figure
1. Further, the sluggish response of an FC can be improved by
combining it with a BESS so the whole system can provide
a continuous and constant power supply to a DC bus. A VSI
is connected to invert the DC voltage into three-phase AC,
which is further connected to the grid. At the PCC, the linear and non-linear loads are connected. A hybrid filter is also
connected at the PCC to compensate the source voltage and
current, providing quality power to the grid.
2.1.
Photovoltic Module
q V
I Rs
+
N p 1
I P V = N p I ph N p Is e AkT Ns
Np
Rsh
V
I Rs
+
Ns
Np
,
(1)
FC
2238
BESS
Hybrid Filter
3.
CONTROL STRATEGIES OF HS
Patra et al.: Power Quality Improvement in Grid-connected PhotovoltaicFuel Cell Based Hybrid System
2239
(3)
(4)
where
perfectly robust MPPT design; specifically, the controller must
enforce the PV voltage to track as accurately as possible even
in rapid change in temperature and solar; (iii) a unity power
factor (PF) in the grid; and (iv) a suitable controller for a hybrid
filter to improve the PQ.
3.1.
(5)
2240
L IL = V p d Vba ,
(6)
3.1.1.
ce = n ke e.
The interleaved boost converters are governed by a control signal generated by the backstepping controller. This controller
is developed to maximize the power of the solar generating
system. The controller tracks a desired array voltage designed
on-line by using the MPPT algorithm by varying the duty cycle of the switching converter. The key idea of backstepping
control design is to generate virtual control in steps for a complicated system so that a simpler single-inputsingle-output
system in each step can be dealt with systematically; the next
step is always designed on the basis of previous step. Finally,
the stability of the complete system is judged by the Lyapunov
function [6].
An assumption made for robust controller design:
I p is
Ip
, where is a positive number.
The purpose is to maximize the power extracted from a solar
generating system Pp by tracking a continuously changing
array voltage Vd (Vd is the desired array voltage) so that V p
Vd as t by continuously varying the duty cycle of the
off-state of the switched control signal.
The generation of the reference voltage as shown in [28]
calculated from
Vop = Vx + Vx b ln(b b e(1/b) ),
e = Vd V p ,
(8)
n = I L Id ,
(9)
(10)
(12)
(14)
(15)
1 2 1 2
ce + Ln .
2
2
(17)
Stability Analysis
(7)
(13)
V =
1 2 1 2
ce + Ln .
2
2
(18)
(20)
V ke e2 kn n 2 k1 |n| L
Ip
|n| .
If k 1 is chosen in such a so that k1 L , then
V ke e2 kn n 2 .
(21)
Patra et al.: Power Quality Improvement in Grid-connected PhotovoltaicFuel Cell Based Hybrid System
2241
3.2.
Due to easy realization and implementation, SVPWM technology is widely used in inverters. For calculating the vectors
of the SVPWM to generate the pulse wave of the VSI, the
trigonometric function is involved and the sector selection is
considered. For the rapid change in power electronics application, the accuracy of SVPWM is very high although the
technique is complicated [29, 30].
Figure 9 shows the closed-loop control technique of a VSI
using the SVPWM technique.
FIGURE 10. Control scheme to calculate compensation voltage for the hybrid filter.
2242
3.4.
The control scheme for the hybrid filter [31] is discussed in this
section. On the load side, the voltage vector and source side of
the current vector are considered. The component of the
voltage and the current vector are obtained by transformation. The real instantaneous power is obtained by the product
of the component of voltage and current, and the mean
value is obtained with the help of a low-pass filter. The fundamental component of the current is obtained by the scheme
shown in Figure 10. A 3- VSI is implemented in the hybrid
filter as the main circuit (Figure 4). Real power demand by the
load should be equal to the power supplied from the main and
the power converter is assumed to be lossless; thus, the DC
capacitor average voltage is maintained as a constant value.
During the transient, such as a sudden change in load, power
imbalance occurs. Therefore, the DC capacitor average voltage
is reduced. At the same time, the current magnitude of the main
supply should be increased to increase the real power supplied
from the source. On the other hand, as the DC capacitor voltage
rises, the source current must be decreased. In this context, the
DC capacitor voltage reflects the information about the real
power flow. Further, to maintain constant DC bus voltage,
it is compared with a reference voltage and then fed to a
proportional-integral (PI) controller. Thus, the control of the
amplitude of the source current is obtained by the PI controller
output.
3.5.
System Configuration
The control scheme in the system configuration was described in detail in the previous section. Furthermore, the HS
component, i.e., PV-FC, is connected to the DC bus through
The control scheme described in previous sections is implemented with the considered HS (as shown in Figure 11) in a
MATLAB platform. All parameters (insolation, temperature
variation, load connected to the system, etc.) are considered in
the simulation and are shown in Appendix A (Table A1).
4.1.
4.1.1.
Time-domain Analysis
Robustness of the System
2243
Patra et al.: Power Quality Improvement in Grid-connected PhotovoltaicFuel Cell Based Hybrid System
2244
4.2.
FIGURE 13. Hybrid power filter behavior: (a) source current
of phase A without filter, (b) with passive filter, and (c) with
hybrid filter.
PQ Improvement at PCC
In the present analysis, PQ improvement is also studied. Figure 13 exhibits the PQ improvement with incorporation of a hybrid filter over a passive filter. The change of load for different
case studies is given in Appendix A (Table A3). Figure 13(a)
shows the current waveform of phase A at the PCC without
the filter when both linear and non-linear loads are connected;
Figures 13(b) and 13(c) show the same with a passive filter
and hybrid filter, respectively. A comparison has been done in
terms of total harmonic distortion (THD) and power factor in
Appendix A (Table A3). It is shown that hybrid filter exhibits
better performance than the passive filter.
Four types of case studies have been considered: (I) linear
and non-linear balanced load without a hybrid filter, (II linear
and non-linear balanced load with a hybrid filter, (III) linear
and non-linear unbalanced load without a hybrid filter, and (IV)
linear and non-linear unbalanced load with a hybrid filter. The
fifth and seventh harmonic components of the source current
are suppressed by the LC passive filter. The source voltage
and source current waveform and fast Fourier transform (FFT)
analysis of the source current THD of phase A without using
the hybrid filter is presented in Figures 14(a) and 14(b); the
same results are shown with incorporation of a hybrid filter in
Figures 14(c) and 14(d). A comparative assessment is made of
source current with and without a hybrid filter in Figure 14(e).
Case III and Case IV are depicted in Figures 14(f) and 14(g),
Experimental Setup
2245
Patra et al.: Power Quality Improvement in Grid-connected PhotovoltaicFuel Cell Based Hybrid System
2246
FIGURE 15. (a) Hardware prototype of the proposed system, (b) Spartan-6 LX45 FPGA connected with PC, and (c)
digital signal processor dsPlC60F2410 for power management
strategy.
5.
4.3.
Quantitative Analysis
Case studies presented in previous sections confirm the robustness of the proposed controller for maximum power tracking
as well as PQ improvement at the PCC using a hybrid power
filter. In Section 4.1.1 (Robustness of the System), MPPT with
a backstepping controller was shown to exhibit constant power
CONCLUSION
FIGURE 16. (a) Generated gate pulse for the boost converter
using I&C method, (b) generated gate pulse for the boost converter using backstepping method, (c) source voltage at PCC,
and (d) source current with and without filter with incorporation of non-linear load.
REFERENCES
[1] Jeon, J., Kim, S., Cho, C., and Ahn, J., Development of a gridconnected wind/PV/BESS hybrid distributed generation system, 19th International Conference on Electricity Distribution
(CIRED), Vienna, Austria, 2124 May 2007.
Patra et al.: Power Quality Improvement in Grid-connected PhotovoltaicFuel Cell Based Hybrid System
[2] Onara, O. C., Uzunoglua, M., and Alama, M. S., Modeling, control and simulation of an autonomous wind turbine/photovoltaic/fuel cell/ultracapacitor hybrid power system,
J. Power Sources, Vol. 185, No. 2, pp. 12731283, 2008.
[3] Kim, S. K., Jeon, J. H., Cho, C. H., Ahn, J. B., and Kwon, S.
H., Dynamic modeling and control of a grid-connected hybrid
generation system with versatile power transfer, IEEE Trans.
Ind. Electron., Vol. 55, No. 4, pp. 16771688, April 2008.
[4] Mohanty, A., Viswavandya, M., Ray, P. K., and Patra, S., Stability analysis and reactive power compensation issue in a microgrid with a DFIG based WECS, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy
Syst. Sci., Vol. 62, pp. 753762, 2014.
[5] Iyasere, E., Tatlicioglu, E., and Dawson, D. M., Backstepping
PWM control for maximum power tracking in photovoltaic array systems, 2010 American Control Conference Marriott Waterfront, pp. 35613565, Baltimore, MD, 30 June2 July 2010
[6] Montaseri, G., and Yazdanpanah, M. J., Adaptive control of
uncertain nonlinear systems using mixed backstepping and Lyapunov redesign techniques, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer.
Simulat., Vol. 17, No. 8, pp. 33673380, August 2012.
[7] Chiu, C.-S., Ouyang, Y.-L., and Ku, C.-Y., Terminal sliding
mode control for maximum power point tracking of photovoltaic
power generation systems,Solar Energy, Vol. 86, No. 10, pp.
29862995, October 2012.
[8] Wang, B., and Qin, S., Backstepping sliding mode control
of variable pitch wind power system, Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC), pp. 13, Chengdu, 2831
March 2010.
[9] Makhlouf, M., Messai, F., and Benalla, H., Modeling and simulation of grid-connected hybrid photovoltaic/battery distributed
generation system, Can. J. Electr. Electron. Eng., Vol. 3, No.
1, pp. 110, January 2012.
[10] Jardan, R. K., and Nagy, I., Power quality conditioning in
distributed generation systems, CES/IEEE 5th International
Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (IPEMC
2006), paper no. 4078461, pp. 13381342, Shanghai, 1416
August 2006.
[11] Degroote, L., Renders, B., Meersman, B., Vandoorn, T. L.,
and Vandevelde, L., Power quality improvements through
power electronic interfaced distributed generation, International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion (SPEEDAM 2010), paper no. 5545048,
pp. 895901 Pisa, 1416 June 2010.
[12] Paulillo, G., Impinnisi, P. R., Cantao, M. P., and Garcia, F. R.,
Power quality in distributed generation system based on fuel
cell technologya case study, 11th International Conference
on Harmonics and Quality of Power, pp. 608612, Orlando,
FL, 1215 September 2004.
[13] Mazumder, S. K., and Huang, R., A high-power highfrequency and scalable multi-megawatt fuel-cell inverter for
power quality and distributed generation, International Conference on Power Electronics, Drives and Energy Systems (PEDES
06), paper no. 4147989, New Delhi, 1215 December 2006.
[14] Sousa Lima, R. J., De Almeida, A. T., Mendes, A. M. S., and
Cardoso, A. J. M., High power quality system with fuel cell distributed generation - Simulation and tests, IEEE International
Symposium on Industrial Electronics, paper no. 4375034, pp.
26972702, Vigo, 47 June 2007.
2247
2248
Time (sec)
Temperature (K)
298
320
298
320
600
610
720
740
0
0.03
0.06
0.09
APPENDIX A
Time (sec)
1.3
0.00023 A/K
0.0064
1573
1.173 eV
298 K
3.75 A
1000 W/m2
10
2
70 V
L = 60 mH, C = 240 F, fsw =
10 kHz
k 1 = 0.12, Kn = 3.85, ke = 1.1
10 kW
L = 1 mH, C = 1 mF, fsw =
10 kHz
Open-loop control, switch duty
cycle = 10%
Three-phase VSI
SVPWM
10
2
12 V DC
2 kW, 226 A.hr
00.5
0.51.0
1.01.5
DC load
Linear load
Non-linear load
On
Off
Off
Off
On
Off
On
On
On
2249
Power factor
THD (%)
Linear load
Non-linear load
Both loads
Linear load
Non-linear load
Both loads
0.13
18.9
19.7
0.99
0.983
0.984
Hybrid
filter
Case I
0.11
4.6
4.9
0.99
0.985
0.997
Passive
filter
0.13
12.1
13
0.99
0.9825
0.9845
Hybrid
filter
Phase a
0.13
11.9
12.75
0.99
0.983
0.984
Hybrid
filter
Phase b
0.13
19.1
20.1
0.99
0.98
0.98
Hybrid
filter
Phase c
0.08
2
2
0.99
0.98
0.992
Hybrid
filter
0.1
5.0
5.2
0.99
0.98
0.99
Passive
filter
Phase a
TABLE A4. THD and power factor before and after the use of hybrid filter
0.1
1.89
2
0.99
0.985
0.998
Hybrid
filter
Case II
Case III
0.08
3
2.5
0.99
0.98
0.99
0.1
4.98
5.7
0.99
0.98
0.99
Passive
filter
Phase b
Case IV
Hybrid
filter
0.08
3
2
0.99
0.99
0.99
Hybrid
filter
0.1
5.1
5.5
0.99
0.98
0.99
Passive
filter
Phase c
2250
BIOGRAPHIES
Sandipan Patra completed his B.Tech. in electronics and instrumentation engineering from West Bengal University of
Technology, India, and his Masters degree in electrical engineering with specialization in power electronics and application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) design from Motilal
Nehru National Institute of Technology (MNNIT), Allahabad.
Currently he is a Ph.D. research scholar at NIT Rourkela. His
areas of interest include PQ, multi-level inverters, DG, and
signal processing applications in power electronics.
Ankur received his B.Tech. in electronics engineering from the
Institute of Engineering and Rural Technology, Allahabad, and
his Masters degree in control and instrumentation engineering
from MNNIT Allahabad. Currently he is an engineer at GE
India. His research interests include renewable energy and
DG.
Modem Narayana received his B.Tech. in electrical and electronics engineering from Sri Venkateswara University College of Engineering, Tirupati, India, in1996 and his M.Tech.
from Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, College of