Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Temp of Steam
(4.4 atm)
(Celsius)
Temp of Incoming
Stream
(Celsius)
Temp of Outgiong
Stream
(Celsius)
Log mean Temperature
Differnce
h - Heat transfer
coefficient (W/m^2*s)
Q = h*A*T
Q - Energy put into
reboiler (kJ/hr)
Q - Energy put into
reboiler (kJ/s)
Q - Energy put into
reboiler (J/s)
A = Q/(h*T)
Area of Reboiler (m^2)
Heat of vaporization
(kJ/kg steam)
Low Pressure Steam
Required (kg)
147
121.3
121.5
25.59986979
2000
1.15E+08
3.20E+04
3.20E+07
624.4606415
2121
5.43E+04
Problem 2 PART A
D501
R=2
R=3
R=5
0.9985
0.1941
0.8053
0.0006
0.9986
0.1948
0.8047
0.0005
0.9986
0.1962
0.8035
0.0003
QH507
1.11E+0
8
1.05E+0
7
7.05E+0
6
1.92E+0
6
8.13E+0
5
1.54E+0
7
1.14E+0
8
1.50E+0
4
7.17E+0
7
6.27E+0
5
1.11E+0
8
1.03E+0
7
7.05E+0
6
2.82E+0
6
8.13E+0
5
1.54E+0
7
1.15E+0
8
1.47E+0
4
7.14E+0
7
6.29E+0
5
1.11E+0
8
9.87E+0
6
6.98E+0
6
4.64E+0
6
8.13E+0
5
1.55E+0
7
1.17E+0
8
1.40E+0
4
7.11E+0
7
6.32E+0
5
Total
Energy
2.96E+0
7
2.94E+0
7
2.94E+0
7
515 EtOH
510 EtOH
510 H2O
510 CO2
QH512
QRB502
QH503
QCD501
QH506
QH509
QRB501
QT507-8
QCD502
Problem 2 PART B
D502
R=3
515
EtOH
511
EtOH
511H2O
511CO2
R=3.
8
R=5
0.9974
0.9985
0.9985
0.689
0.3092
0.0018
0.7989
0.1992
0.0019
0.8002
0.1979
0.0019
QH512
1.15E+
08
2.82E+
06
2.53E+
06
6.24E+
07
7.88E+
05
2.78E+
04
1.01E+
07
5.87E+
05
1.44E+
07
1.11E+
08
1.15E+
08
2.82E+
06
1.04E+
07
7.16E+
07
8.13E+
05
1.49E+
04
7.11E+
06
6.28E+
05
1.54E+
07
1.11E+
08
1.15E+0
8
2.82E+0
6
3.29E+0
7
9.41E+0
7
8.13E+0
5
1.48E+0
4
7.07E+0
6
6.29E+0
5
1.54E+0
7
1.11E+0
8
Total
Energy
2.87E+
07
2.94E+
07
2.94E+0
7
QRB501
QCD501
QRB502
QCD502
QH506
QT507-8
QH503
QH507
QH509
We noticed that an increase in the reflux ratio of the system increased the
purity of the final product but also increased the energy necessary to
complete the process. The amount of distillate sent back through the
column is increased with an increasing reflux ratio which is what allows for
the increase in purity both in the overhead product stream as well as the
final ethanol product.
40,000
47630
55000
0.9957
0.9986
0.9975
0.1985
0.1948
0.1661
QRB501
QCD501
QRB502
QCD502
QH506
QT507-8
QH503
QH507
QH509
QH512
1.01E+08
2.82E+06
4.49E+07
8.92E+07
7.12E+05
-4.01E+04
1.36E+07
5.36E+05
1.32E+07
1.11E+08
115100000
2817000
1.05E+07
71580000
812600
-14940
7110000
628100
15430000
111300000
1.31E+08
2.82E+06
2.06E+06
7.80E+07
7.93E+05
-2.61E+04
9.66E+06
5.92E+05
1.46E+07
1.11E+08
Total Energy
2.77E+07
2.94E+07
2.87E+07
EtOH 515
(mol Frac)
EtOH 510
(mol Frac)
Increasing the flow rate in the 510 stream resulted in a decrease in the mol
fraction of ethanol. The increased flow rate did not allow for the separation
Problem 4
Changing the Overhead flow rate from the second column showed a
decrease in the ethanol concentration in the stream since the diluted
stream contained proportionally more water. This increase did not have a
desirable effect on the overall system performance since we also observed
an increase in the energy consumption, although there seemed to be a
plateau effect on the energy consumption.
Problem 5
Problem 6