Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
The first ankle prostheses appeared in 1973 as an degenerative, inflammatory or post-traumatic pain-
alternative to ankle arthrodesis, which was until then ful ankle. Several techniques of arthrodesis exist,
the only valid solution for a painful degenerative, with or without loss of height and using several
rheumatoid or posttraumatic ankle. Several designs types of fixation device.
followed, all with disappointing results.
Watson Jones praised arthrodesis saying: “We
Low-constraint prostheses are now being used,with
literature studies of 5 years follow-up. can see the patient walk without hesitation, run,
In this study, the authors have evaluated the results jump, being able to pursue his occupations and
of 26 uncemented, hydroxyapatite-coated STAR pratice sports with an insignificant disability” (8).
prostheses, all implanted between January 1996 and Invalidating pain could thus be solved by fusion if
December 1999, with an average follow-up of performed in the right position.
15.8 months (range: 1.5 to 48 months). Charnley, on the other hand, did not consider this
For evaluation, all patients filled out a questionnaire gold standard procedure as an absolute success and
at three different moments in time, and all of them reported a complication rate of 60% with as many
were clinically reviewed by one single observer. The
as 20% nonunions (27).
Kofoed ankle score was used for clinical evaluation.
All ankle prostheses were also radiographically Since then arthrodesis of the tibiotalar joint pro-
reviewed, using a radiographic scoring system deve- ved to have some harmful consequences to neigh-
loped by the authors. bouring joints. This procedure should therefore be
Evaluation with the Kofoed ankle score showed 74% avoided in patients with degenerative knee-, subta-
favourable results. When patients were asked to rate lar- or midfoot joints (17, 40).
their satisfaction on a scale between 0 and 100, an In 1973 the first total ankle prosthesis was intro-
average improvement of 50/100 was reached. duced, offering a solution for the invalidating pain
Pain was the most important indication to surgery (the most important indication) as well as for resto-
and is the only parameter that can be predictibly inf-
ring motion and stability (34). As in other joints, the
luenced. The effects on motion and walking distance
are less predictible. ideal prosthesis had to meet certain standards in
No major complications occurred and there were no order to achieve a pain-free ankle joint with a range
revision operations. of motion of + 35° (10° dorsiflexion and 25° plan-
Should prosthetic failure occur, an arthrodesis can tar flexion) which is necessary for normal ambula-
still be performed, as bone resection in the primary tion and for climbing stairs (2, 8, 34). A construction
procedure has been minimal.
————————
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, U.Z. Pellenberg,
INTRODUCTION Weligerveld 1, B-3212 Lubbeek (Pellenberg).
Correspondence and reprints : G Dereymaeker, Department
Until the second half of the twentieth century, of Orthopaedic Surgery, U Z Pellenberg, Weligerveld 1, B-3212
ankle arthrodesis was the only valid solution for a Pellenberg, Belgium.
has to be biocompatible, cause minimal wear, We tried to develop such a scoring system. Tilting,
respect ligamentous structures, be flexible enough subsidence and radiolucent lines can easily be eva-
to correct all kinds of deformities and, not least, luated on sequential radiographs in the same inci-
cause minimal bone loss so that arthrodesis can still dence, but the question is whether or not they
be performed in case of failure (2, 3, 4, 9, 13, 14, 16, 17, depend on the position of the components (40). It is
22, 28, 29, 36, 38). a known fact that there is no correlation between
Several designs were tested, from a ball-in-soc- radiographic findings and clinical symptoms (28,
ket concept to constrained or unconstrained designs 40).
of the present concept, all with their own rationale,
results and failures. Most of these types were MATERIAL AND METHODS
cemented (1, 5, 10, 11-13, 19-21, 30, 31, 33, 35, 37, 40, 41).
In 1998 Kofoed showed that constrained designs Between January 1996 and December 1999,
lead to significantly worse results than designs 25 patients received 27 ankle prostheses in the orthopa-
allowing cylindrical movement (15, 18). He also edic department of the University Hospitals of
underlined that uncemented prostheses perform Pellenberg. All patients were operated upon by the seni-
better than cemented ones (39). In 1994 Kitaoka or author (G. D.). Twenty-six of these prostheses are in
follow-up. One could not be included in the study becau-
demonstrated that the results of ankle prostheses in
se the patient was admitted to the intensive care unit in
younger patients with previous ankle surgery are a coma after surgery unrelated to the index pathology,
clearly worse than in older patients without pre- with fatal outcome.The average age of the patients was
vious surgery (15, 26). 53.9 years (ranging from 32 to 78 years). Fourteen men
According to the literature, a total ankle prosthe- and 11 women were operated upon. Two men had bila-
sis should not be used in cases with active or prior teral prostheses (at different interventions). The opera-
infection, avascular necrosis of the talus (which tion was on the right side in 10 cases, on the left in 17.
causes more subsidence of the talar component), The mean follow-up is 15.8 months (ranging from 1.5
ligamentous instability, after prior tibiotalar arthro- to 48 months). The follow-up was done by means of a
desis (which causes more heterotopic ossification) questionnaire asking the patient to score his level of
and for younger patients with a very high level of pain, functional level, general activity and general satis-
physical activity or previous surgery to the ankle faction. This questionnaire was filled out at three sepa-
rate times (pre-operatively, two months post-operatively
joint (3, 9, 12, 15, 25, 28). In cases of prosthetic failu-
and at the latest follow-up visit).
re an arthrodesis can be performed since the All patients were reviewed clinically by a single inde-
modern designs resect a minimal quantity of bone. pendent observer at which time function and pain were
The S.T.A.R. uncemented total ankle prosthesis again assessed and the results evaluated using the
has been used in our institution since 1996. We Kofoed ankle score (table I).
report here the early results of 26 prostheses that The first and last X-ray of comparable incidence of
were implanted between January 1996 and each patient were evaluated using our own X-ray scoring
December 1999. system (table II) as an attempt to evaluate the interven-
The department of foot and ankle surgery at the tion. The angle of the tibial component to the long axis
Pellenberg University hospital is involved in furth- of the tibia was measured on radiographs (frontal and
er development of the prosthesic design hoping for lateral view). Deviations exceeding 2° from normal
standardisation of this technically demanding pro- (90°) were considered as improper placement. The same
was done for the talar component with respect to the
cedure, whih would give rise to long-term impro-
talar body and tibial component, again on frontal and
vements of the results. lateral view. More than 5 mm distance between the
At this moment there is no specific radiological centre of the talar component and the centre of the talar
information to determine the “ideal” position of the body or the centre of the tibial component were consi-
components. A radiographic scoring system is nee- dered as improper placement. The polyethylene insert
ded to evaluate the results technically and to corre- was evaluated for position and possible fracture. Each of
late these technical data with the clinical findings. these parameters was rated from 10 points (for perfect
Table I. — The Kofoed ankle score Table II. — X-ray evaluation system
EN COULEUR ?
<5 1
Supination (in degrees)
> 30 3
15 to 29 2
> 15 1
Pronation (in degrees)
> 20 3
10 to 19 2
< 10 1
Valgus during load (in degrees)
<5 2
5 to 10 1
> 10 0
Varus during load (in degrees) Fig. 1. — The STAR uncemented total ankle prosthesis : talar
<4 2 and tibial components and polyethylene insert.
4 to 7 1
>7 0 The uncemented hydroxyapatite-coated S.T.A.R.
EVALUATION total ankle prosthesis (Waldemar Link, Germany) (fig 1)
Excellent 85 to 100 was implanted using an anterior approach. The tibial cut
Good 75 to 84 was perpendicular to the long axis of the tibia and was
Moderate 70 to 74 performed with the utmost care in order to avoid fractu-
Unacceptable < 70 ring the medial or the lateral malleolus. The talar cuts
were then made with the ankle in 90° of flexion and in
positioning) to 0 points (if any fault was present). neutral varus-valgus position. There are three sizes for
Radiolucent lines, subsidence, tilting, fracture or saw the tibial component (small, medium, large) and three
cuts and medial or lateral radiographical impingement sizes for the talar component (small, medium, large)
scored 0 (if present) or 10 points (if absent). The maxi- with a difference between right and left. The polyethyle-
mum total score in this evaluation is 100 points. ne insert comes in five different thicknesses from 6 to
Table III. — Indication according to patient The large percentage of haemophilia patients in this
study is also unusual and is related to our connection
Pain 77%
with a specialised center.
Walking distance 77%
Motion 18%
Insecurity 18% RESULTS
Functional limitation 4%
The reasons mentioned by the patient as impor-
Table IV. — Pain location
tant in his decision to undergo surgery are listed in
table III. In 77% of the cases, invalidating pain was
Pre-op Latest follow-up the most important indication for the patient.
Ankle 100% 60% Decrease in walking distance is mentioned as being
Lower leg 26% 8% important in a similar proportion of cases.
Heel 26% 13% The pain had been present for an average dura-
Mid/forefoot 4% 13% tion of three years and nine months (ranging from
Toes 4% 4%
Knee 4% 13%
1 to 10 years) before deciding upon an operation.
Pain location was mainly around the ankle, lower
leg and heel. If postoperative pain was present, it
Table V. — Pain on VAS was mostly located at the same place (table IV).
By investigation with the visual analogue scale
Pre-op. 2 m. postop. At latest follow-up
(VAS) a clear reduction in pain during activity was
Activity 8.4 (4-10) 4.5 (0-10) 2.8 (0-9) achieved from an average of 8.4 (4-10) to 2.8 (0-9).
Rest 5.0 (0-10) 3.2 (0-10) 2.0 (0-8)
Night 4.5 (0-10) 2.7 (0-10) 1.5 (0-7)
This decrease in pain was almost always immedia-
tely postoperative (table V).
Pre-operatively, more than 70% of the patients
Table VI. — Professional status felt continuous severe pain, mainly during walking
and climbing stairs as well as during walking on
Pre-op. 2 m. postop. At latest
follow-up uneven surfaces. Postoperatively only 8% of the
patients suffered serious pain. Thirty-nine percent
Normal/retired 58% 45% 53%
None because of ankle 33% 45% 26%
were pain-free, 13% had pain when walking on
None because of other 9% 10% 21% uneven ground and 34% felt occasional pain. The
pain level of 92% of the patients was clearly reduced.
Regarding occupational activities, there were no
10 mm. An average of 4 mm of bone was resected on the important changes (table VI).
tibial side and 2 to 3 mm on the talar side. A clear improvement was also noted for activi-
Full weight bearing in a lower leg cast was already ties of daily life. Seventy-seven percent were very
encouraged at one week postoperatively. Cast immobili- limited or were unable to do most housekeeping
sation was continued for a period of 4 weeks. A short activities pre-operatively. A vast majority of the
readmission (average 2.5 days) at the time of cast remo- patients had a clear improvement in the activities of
val was performed for intensive revalidation, to instruct
daily life. No single patient was totally dependent
correct gait rehabilitation and walking pattern.
after the procedure (table VII).
The indications for operation were posttraumatic
osteoarthritis in 7 cases, haemophilia in 6, rheumatoid Pre-operatively 96% of patients were unable or
arthritis in 4, primary osteoarthritis in 4, haemochroma- almost unable to perform any recreational activity.
tosis in 4, psoriasis and Charcot-Marie-Tooth in one case Postoperatively 43% were able to do almost any
each. There is a remarkably low percentage of primary activity (table VIII).
osteoarthritis. Apparently the ankle joint resists degene- Ninety-one percent of the patients needed
ration better than other large joints, despite a load of significant amounts of medication, consisting
4 times body weight during normal activities (5, 29, 36). mainly of anti-inflammatory and analgetic drugs.
Fig. 2. — Clinical aspect three months after arthroplasty of the left ankle joint with a STAR prosthesis : (a) neutral position ;
(b) plantar flexion, anterior view ; (c) plantar flexion, posterior view.
Table XIII. — General satisfaction on 100 points at Table XIV. — Kofoed ankle score
subjective evaluation (total and separate constituents)
the range of motion remains unpredictable. Range If prosthetic failure should occur, arthrodesis of
of motion in this study improved by an average of the tibiotalar joint can still be performed, due to the
11.8 points, reaching a average range of 35°, minimal resection of bone (10, 14, 31, 34, 38). This
between 10° dorsi- and 25° plantar flexion minimal resection of the subchondral bone may
(table XIV). Even though this improvement is sub- also explain the fact that we encountered no col-
stantial, it is clinically unclear whether or not lapse of the components and only once a minimal
motion in all directions occurs only in the tibio- tilting of the talar component (2). Therefore the
talar joint, or also in the subtalar and midfoot operation can be considered safe from all points of
joints (28). To study this in more depth, a cinemato- view.
graphic X-ray study is indicated. This was not done This technically demanding procedure offers
in this study. considerable latitude with regard to instrumenta-
The same remarks can be made about the loca- tion. The large variation in the X-ray evaluations
tion of postoperative pain (table IV). If pain is still confirms this as well. Improvement in instrumenta-
present, 60% locate it around the ankle joint. The tion will certainly lead to a better positioning of the
contribution of the subtalar and talonavicular joint components. It is to be hoped that in the future the
in this pain pattern should not be omitted. Most of study of X-ray images will contribute to a better
these patients show degenerative X-ray findings of operating technique so that in the end, the total
the subtalar joint. A subtalar steroid injection could ankle prosthesis could perform as well as the total
resolve or improve the pain complaints. The high knee- or hip prosthesis.
percentage of haemophilia patients in this study is Although this study has a short follow-up, early
remarkable and is not mentioned elsewhere in the results seem promising. We believe that for the
literature. A large number of patients with persis- right indication the total ankle prosthesis is a valu-
ting pain is made up of these haemophiliacs. This is able alternative to arthrodesis. Our unit cooperates
not surprising since all the midfoot joints and not in every respect to further develop better and more
only the tibiotalar joint are affected in haemophilia. reliable material. Further studies and more data
The most important indication is invalidating remain necessary to come to further conclusions.
pain. If this is not made clear to the patient pre-ope-
ratively, disappointments may occur. REFERENCES
The fact that occupational activities did not
undergo an significant change may be explained by 1. Bolton B, Sudlow R, Freeman M. Total ankle arthropla-
the fact that 74% of the patients suffered from an sty. A long-term review of the London Hospital experien-
invalidating systemic disease (rheumatoid arthritis, ce. J Bone Joint Surg 1985 ; 67-B : 785-790
2. Buechel F, Pappas M, Iorio L. New Jersey low contact
haemophilia, Charcot-Marie-Tooth). stress total ankle replacement: biomechanical rationale and
Studying a frontal and lateral X-ray, we tried to review of 23 cementless cases. Foot Ankle 1988 ; 8 : 279-
determine a correct position of the prosthetic 290
components. We have not found any correlation 3. Burge P, Evans M. Effect of surface replacement arthro-
between X-ray findings and clinical symptoms so plasty on stability of the ankle. Foot Ankle, 1986 ; 7 : 10-17
4. Carlsson A. Arthrodesis of the ankle secondary to replace-
far. For example, 9 out of 11 patients with radio-
ment. Foot Ankle 1998 ; 19 : 240-245
graphic impingement of the components score 5. Dini A, Bassett F. Evaluation of the early results of Smith
themselves as “excellent”. Some patients with ideal total ankle replacement. Clin Orthop 1980 ; 146 : 228-230
X-ray findings complain of residual pain, while 6. Demottaz J, Mazur J, Thomas W et al. Clinical study of
others score themselves subjectively and clinically total ankle replacement with gait analysis. A preliminary
as “excellent” with imperfect X-ray findings. report. J Bone Joint Surg 1979 ; 61-A : 976-988
7. Evansky P, Waugh T. Management of arthritis of the
Further evaluation is needed to determine if there ankle. An alternative of arthrodesis. Clin Orthop 1977 ;
are certain variations from an as yet to be determi- 122 : 110-115
ned “ideal situation”, that can predict prosthetic 8. Fessy M, Carret J, Bejui J. Morphometry of the talo-
failure. crural joint. Surg Radiol Anatomy 1997 ; 19 : 299-302
9. Groth H, Fitch H. Salvage procedures for complications 25. Manes H, Alvarez E, Lleviene L. Preliminary report of
of total ankle arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1987 ; 224 : 244- total ankle arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the talus. Clin
250 Orthop 1977 ; 127 : 200-202
10. Herberts P, Goldie I, Korner L et al. Endoprosthetic 26. Mcguire M, Kyle R, Gustilo R et al. Comparative analy-
arthroplasty of the ankle joint. A clinical and radiological sis of ankle arthroplasty versus ankle arhtrodesis. Clin
follow-up. Acta Orthop Scand 1982 ; 53 : 687-696 Orthop 1988 ; 226 : 174-181.
11. Jarde O, Gabrion A, Meire P et al. Complications et 27. Newton S. An artificial ankle joint. Clin Orthop 1979 ;
échecs des prothèses totales de la cheville. A propos de 142 : 141-145
21 observations. Rev Chir Orthop 1997 ; 83 : 645-651 28. Newton S. Total ankle arthroplasty. Clinical study of
12. Kirkup J. Richard Smith ankle arthroplasty. J Royal Soc 50 cases. J Bone Joint Surg 1982 ; 64-A : 104-111
Med 1985 ; 78 : 301-304 29. Pappas M, Buechel F, DePalma A. Cylindrical total ankle
13. Kitaoka H. Salvage of non-union following ankle arthro- replacement: surgical and biomechanical rationale. Clin
desis for failed total ankle arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1991 ; Orthop 1976 ; 118 : 82-92
268 : 37-43 30. Pyevich M, Saltzman C, Callaghan J et al. Total ankle
14. Kitaoka H, Romness D. Arthrodesis for failed total ankle arthroplasty: a unique design. Two to 12 year follow-up.
arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1992 ; 7 : 277-284 J Bone Joint Surg 1998 ; 80-A : 1410-1420
15. Kitaoka H, Patzer G, Ilstrup D. et al. Survivorship ana- 31. Pipino F. Ankle prosthesis. 5 year follow-up. Acta Orthop
lysis of the Mayo total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Belg 1983 ; 49 : 725-735
Surg 1994 ; 76-A : 974-979 32. Schill S, Biehl C, Thabe H. Prothetische Versorgung des
16. Kitaoka H, Patzer G. Clinical results of the Mayo total Sprunggelenks. Orthopäde 1998 ; 27 : 183-187
ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 1996 ; 78-A : 1658- 33. Scholz K. Total ankle replacement arthroplasty. Foot
1664 Science 1974 ; 8 : 106-135
17. Kofoed H. Cylindrical cemented ankle arthroplasty: a pro- 34. Smith C. Physical therapy management of patients with
spective series with long-term follow-up. Foot Ankle total ankle replacement. J Am Phys Ther Assoc 1980 ; 60 :
1995 ; 16 : 474-479 303-306
18. Kofoed H, Sorensen T. Ankle arthroplasty for rheumatoid 35. Spaulding J, Megesi R, Figgie H et al. Total ankle arth-
arthritis and osteoarthritis: prospective long-term study of roplasty. A procedural review. AORN J 1988 ; 48 : 201-203
cemented replacements. J Bone Joint Surg 1998 ; 80-B : 36. Stauffer R, Chao E, Brewster R. Force and motion ana-
328-332 lysis of the normal, diseased and prosthetic ankle joint.
19. Kofoed H, Lundberg A. Ankle arthroplasty in patients Clin Orthop 1977 ; 127 : 189-196
younger and older than 50 years : a prospective series with 37. Stauffer R, Segal N. Total ankle arthroplasty: 4 years’
long-term follow-up. Foot Ankle Internat 1999 ; 20 : 501- experience. Clin Orthop 1981 ; 160 : 217-221
506 38. Stauffer R. Salvage of painful total ankle arthroplasty.
20. Lachiewicz P, Inglis A, Ranawat C. Total ankle replace- Clin Orthop 1982 ; 170 : 184-188
ment in rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg 1984 ; 66- 39. Takakura Y, Tanaka Y, Sugimoto K et al. Ankle arthro-
A : 340-343 plasty. A comparative study of cemented metal and unce-
21. Lachiewicz P. Total ankle arthroplasty. Indications, tech- mented ceramic prostheses. Clin Orthop 1990 ; 252 : 209-
niques, and results. Orthop Rev 1994 ; 23 : 315-320 216
22. Leardini A, O’Connor J, Catani P et al. A geometric 40. Unger A, Inglis A, Mow C et al. Total ankle arthroplasty
model of the human ankle joint. J Biomech 1999 ; 32 : in rheumatoid arthritis: a long-term follow-up study. Foot
585-591 Ankle 1988 ; 8 : 173-179
23. Lord G, Marotte J. Prothèse totale de cheville. Technique 41. Wynn A, Wilde A. Long-term follow-up of the Conaxial
et premiers résultats à propos de 12 cas. Rev Chir Orthop (Beck Steffee) total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle 1992 ;
1973 ; 59 : 139-151 13 : 303-306
24. Lord G, Marotte J. L’arthroplastie totale de la cheville.
Experience sur 10 ans, à propos de 25 observations person-
nelles. Rev Chir Orthop 1980 ; 66 : 527-530