Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Longitudinal Dynamics
6.1 Background
This chapter considers the aircraft's longitudinal behavior about the pitch-axis
reference frame. The system's dynamics will be developed by viewing the airframe
as a multi-degree-of-freedom eigenvalue problem using control theory concepts
described in Chapter 5. Descriptions of the mode shapes will be obtained and
approximations will be made to the equations of motion in order to increase the
understanding of the dynamics. It will be found that the fore and aft c.g. location
(i.e., the distance forward from the neutral point) will play a large role in the
dynamic behavior. In contrast, the airframe's lateral-directional dynamics are not
significantly influenced by the c.g. position.
The linearized governing equations describing the longitudinal motion were
cast into a set of four, first-order, coupled ODEs with constant coefficients, cf.
Sec. 4.6.1. These equations used dimensional coefficients and described the time
varying perturbations of the state vector in real time. The equations were
V(/V)= V X,. (u/V)+ Xa et - g cos 808 + X0 8
(V - Z,)a = VZ u (u/V)+Za et +(V+Z q )q - g sin 80 8 + Z 0 8
- Ma + q
= V M u (u/V)+Ma a + Mq q + M08
8=q
{x} = [u/V et q ef
and there was a single control term, 8, which normally would correspond to the
deflection of either an elevator or a movable horizontal stabilizer.
The presence of the a term on the left-hand side of the pitch moment equation
is worthy of note. It will be found that when making approximations for the short
period mode, algebraic manipulations can be made to simplify the presence of
the term. When investigating the complete linear system, which involves a state
vector with four components, linear algebra solution techniques will be employed.
The solution techniques for the state equations are exactly the same as would be
used to describe the motion dynamics of an automobile, ship, submarine, and even
a bridge structure. The choice of the state vector components and the plant matrix
is problem specific, but the mathematical techniques are fundamental.
165
166
[/n]{i} = [An]{x}
Example 6.1
Consider the A- 4D jet attack aircraft in leve! flight at M = 0.6 , h = 15,000 ft,
and c.g. at 0.25c, cf.Appendix B.l.Sol ve the eigenvalue problem and identify the
mode shapes. The MATLAB listing is as follows:
disp(In)
disp(An)
634.0
o.o
o.o
o.o
o.o
634.0
0.353
o.o
o.o
o.o
1.0000
o.o
O.O
o.o
o.o
1.0000
o.o -32.174
-8.179 -3.721
o.o
-65.94 -518.9 634.0
0.25
-12.97 -1. 071
o.o
o.o
o.o 1.0000 o.o
% The plant matrix [A] in x-dot = A X is:
A=inv(In) *An;
disp(A)
-0.0129 -0.0059
o.o
-0.0507
-0.1040 -0.8185
1.0000
o.o
0.2867 -12.6811 -1.4240
o.o
O.O
O.O
1.0000
O.O
% Find the characteristic polynomial
P=poly(A); disp(P)
1.0000 2.2554 13.8749 O .1939 O.0788
% (s!\4)
(s!\3)
(s/\2)
(s/\1)
(s/\0)
% Find the roots of the characteristic polynomial
R=roots(P); disp(R)
LONGITUDINAL DYNAMICS
167
inv(In)
168
= -1.1211 3.5472i
a
q
e
(u/V))
Wn
= 3.7202
radfs
0.0146L61.33 deg
_
1.000 LO.O deg
- 1
)
3.5614L94.86 deg
0.9573L -12.68 deg
= tan- [j
q {rad/sec)
0.301
3.547 rad/sec
____'1\_
ad =
I
Fig. 6.1
(rad) Real
(rad)
169
LONGITUDINAL DYNAMICS
(1)
111
g_ o
111
(1)
a::
-1
A-4D, Exomple 6. 1
M=0.6. h=lS,000 ft., (x/c\ =0.25
9
-2
1 /
'q. rod/sec
-3 '----'-'--'----'---'-
3
Time, sec
in conjunction with the MATLAB initial command and a time (row) vector that
extended from O to 6 s by 0.05-s intervals, cf. Appendix E. The mode is well
damped as can be noted by the rapid decay of the oscillatory response.
Although the aircraft's plant matrix contains information concerning ali of the
modes, the use of an initial condition corresponding to the short-period eigenvector
provides assurance that only that mode will respond. This statement can be verified
in the following manner.
Because the choice of coordinates used to span state space when describing the
aircraft motion is not unique, it is equally valid to express the motion as a linear
combination of the modal coordinates. The {x(t)} coordinates are related to the
modal form by the following transformation:
where
{x(t} = [P]{v(t)}
(6.2)
(5.64)
LONGITUDINAL DYNAMICS
201
The recognition that ali of the dimensional derivatives are negative in sign
and that (Za M) is greater in magnitude than (Z8 M) allows one to conclude
from Eqs. (6.37) and (6.38) that 1) the airframe acceleration due to a positive
step longitudinal control input will be initially negative in sign and 2) after ali
transients have decayed, the steady-state response will be positive in sign. This
behavior is typical for a nonminimum phase system.
Example 6.1 O
{B}
[z/
-0.8185
1.0000
1.00
J
] [
M; - -12.6811 -1.4240
and
= [-518.9 O.O]
[D]
= -57.02 (ft-s-2)
1) Find the transfer function Gn8(s). Use MATLAB to evaluate Eq. (6.36), i.e.,
which provides
[Num,Den]
= ss2tf ( A,B,C,D, 1)
G no(s) = (-57 2)
s2 + l .424s - 164.12
s2 + 2.243s + 13.847
2) Apply Eq.(6.37) to find the initial normal acceleration due to the unit (1-deg)
elevator step input,
an(O)
3) Find the steady-state value for normal acceleration due to a 1-deg elevator
step input. Instead of evaluating Eq. (6.38), apply the final value theorem to the
G n0(s) transfer function, i.e.,
lim an(t)
/-+()()
= (-57.02 ft-s-2/rad)
(-164.12)
(0.01745 rad/deg)
(13.847)