'UK has underground airport in Helmand'

Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:41:33 GMT

Font size :
British forces have constructed underground airports, concrete wells and warehouses in Afghanistan's
Helmand Province, an informed source says.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, the Afghan source who has worked in Helmand for four years
claimed British troops have dug 60-meter deep wells, reinforcing them with concrete, Fars News Agency
reported.

He added that there is currently no war in Helmand and accused foreign troops stationed there of
portraying a wrong image of the southwestern Afghan province.

According to the unnamed source, the military buildup by the UK and US in Helmand Province shows
they have no immediate pull out plans from Afghanistan and that they are pursuing objectives other than
fighting the Taliban such as concentrating on Iran.

The US and UK have said unrealistic things about Taliban brutality in Helmand Province in order to terrify
and prevent reporters from visiting that province, the source added.

The source claimed to have witnessed military airplanes coming out from beneath a British airbase in
Helmand Province where 60,000 people work.

Commenting on the death of an Afghan correspondent named Ajmal Naqshbandi, the Afghan source
alleged that the reporter had been murdered by the Taliban after attending a secret meeting between the
Taliban and British forces in Helmand Province.

Helmand Province is located in southwestern Afghanistan along the border with Iran.

[ANALYSIS 'UK has underground airport in Helmand' START OF]

PRESS TV Title presents itself as a fact while the symbol at the end is expected
to be created in the mind of the reader.

'UK has underground airport in Helmand [!]'

Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:41:33 GMT Synchronization with Enemies and Allies on a Global Scale

Font size :

+(ADD) 0 – (SUBSTRACT) = REACH

DESIRED CONCLUSION Mathematical
Symbols are used as part of programming
the readers mind.

Applying Philosophical Doctrines

Aggressively to impose its View seems to
be a standard pattern by PRESS TV and
probably other like minded Mainstream
Near East Media.
What Kind of This seems to be one more PRESS TV Message that has to be
Troops are read in reverse. Names do not matter.
coming?

“British [Who is not a British Like Minded Thinker?] forces have constructed underground airports [Where
in Britain?], concrete wells and warehouses in Afghanistan's Helmand Province, an informed source
says. [Message : Seek Places for forces to be Harbored in Britain] “ – PRESS TV

Page last updated at 22:07

GMT, Thursday, 18 February
2010

US, British and Afghan forces

have begun a major offensive
in Helmand province.

BBC News looks at the

offensive and its ultimate
target.

“Speaking on condition of anonymity [Names do not have importance for reasons of secrecy], the Afghan
source [of Anger] who has worked [Working on Anger] in Helmand for four years [Helmand has long been
considered a Taliban Stroghold. That leads to contradiction with the Report PRESS TV gives ] claimed
British troops have dug 60-meter deep wells [No Pictures given], reinforcing them with concrete [Concrete
Arguments], Fars News Agency reported [Focusing on UK, PRESS TV reports about British Mindset’s
Activities].

He added [Programming Mind] that there is currently no war [As Perceived by the Islamic Common
Sense] in Helmand and accused foreign troops stationed there [Elements in UK to] of portraying a
wrong image of the southwestern Afghan province [Mind Occupation in Britain to commence, that
leads to Propaganda Warfare even on an 1 vs 1 basis].

According to the unnamed source [Task of Source], the military [Propaganda Warfare] buildup [Build of
Arguments] by the UK and US in Helmand Province shows [Show Force in Britain] they have no
immediate pull out plans from Afghanistan and that they are pursuing objectives [Neutrals who will take
Islamic Fundamentalist Side and will Choose no] other than fighting the Taliban [British] such as
concentrating on Iran [Part of PRESS TV Message seems to be focusing on Elements located in
Germany].

The US and UK [Divide Sum of Public Opinion] have said unrealistic things [Objectives of British and US
Government have to be presented as Unrealistic, This part of the Message implies use of Al Qaida
Methods in case the Mainstream Media in Britain or in the UK do not apply a Pro Islamic Policy as this is
defined by Tehran] about Taliban [British] brutality in Helmand Province in order [Change order in
Audience’s Mind] to terrify [Apply Psychological Terror where that is Necessary in Britain, US] and
prevent reporters from visiting that province [Occupied Territories in UK, USA], the source added
[Instruction Set Added].

The source claimed to have witnessed [Use Faith and take Advantage of Issues raised against the
Catholic Church] military airplanes [Fields] coming out from beneath [Underground Movement in] a British
airbase [Officially British Territory] in Helmand Province [In UK] where 60,000 people work [Number
seems to have importance so it may be perceived as a Target of Initially affected citizens in UK by Iranian
or other Fundamental Islamist Propaganda. Could also be the number of those sent by Tehran in UK
(Without the Zeros 0)]. “ –PRESS TV

Italian zefiro already meant "west wind" from Latin and Greek
zephyrus; this may have influenced the spelling when transcribing
Arabic ṣifr.[7] The Italian mathematician Fibonacci (c.1170-1250),
who grew up in Arab North Africa and is credited with introducing
the decimal system to Europe, used the term zephyrum. This
became zefiro in Italian, which was contracted to zero in Venetian.

“Commenting on the death of an Afghan [UK] correspondent [Stop] named Ajmal Naqshbandi [name has
secondary or underground importance], the Afghan source [Use Available resources] alleged [Alligator
Predator] that the reporter had been murdered [Kill Mainstream Media Influence, Raise Media Storm to
be seen by Near East] by the Taliban [and UK Public] after attending a secret meeting between the
Taliban and British [Interaction] forces in Helmand Province [In Occupied British Land].

Helmand Province is located in southwestern Afghanistan along the border with Iran.” - PRESS TV

There seems to be a close watch by Iran and other Parties of how the NATO Alliance applies strategems
in Afghanistan and elsewhere to apply the same stratagems through Propaganda in Western Europe and
North America (Mainly UK and the US while Germany & France Follow as part of Targeting the Public
Audience).

The Text that follows below is mostly an indication and should be read as such when it comes in relation
to the analysis above:

“London's Little Afghanistan

The capital has a vibrant Afghan community, with characters from poets to gangsters and every
subdivision in between

When I first moved to London, I found it intriguing that it was actually possible to speak Farsi
there. I stayed in Hyde Park, and around my hotel there were numerous Iranian restaurants.
Walking on London's streets, one could easily find people who spoke Farsi. In the north and west
of the city, about 70% of taxi drivers are either Afghan or Iranian. So it didn't take me long to
meet many fellow Afghans, and be introduced to their restaurants, eateries and associations.” -
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/may/10/london-afghan-community-little-
afghanistan.
“Experts debate how to define the British constitution. Britain is often said to have an
‘unwritten’ constitution, but this is not strictly true, because many of the fundamental aspects
of the constitution can be found in documents, such as Acts of Parliament. However Britain does
not have a single ‘codifying’ document, collecting together the fundamental laws of the nation.

What Britain has is a mixture of various institutions, statutes, conventions, customs, judicial
decisions and treaties, which together can be called ‘the constitution’. The British constitution is
not ‘entrenched’ and there is no document with ‘higher law’ status. There is no single or easy
mechanism for distinguishing constitutional laws from the rest of the law or for testing whether
laws passed or actions taken by governments are ‘unconstitutional’. Unlike other countries, there
is no formal procedure which must be followed before changes are made to the British
constitution

The British constitution has evolved over approximately 800 years and its idiosyncratic nature is
largely a reflection of the nation's history. The elements which comprise the British constitution
are inter-related and changes to one element may have significant repercussions for other
elements. There have been a large number of constitutional reforms in Britain in recent times,
many of which have taken place on a piecemeal basis and without formal public debate on the
long-term implications of such change or consideration of the impact on other elements of the
constitution.” - http://www.re-constitution.org.uk/discover-the-facts/what-is-the-british-
constitution

[ANALYSIS 'UK has underground airport in Helmand' END OF]

'Israel may drag US into new war'

Mon, 12 Apr 2010 12:40:01 GMT
Font size :
Lebanese Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri
Lebanese Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri has expressed fears that Israel may attempt to involve the US
in a new aggression against Lebanon or the Gaza Strip.

"Because of Israel's current disagreements with the US, the Israeli side could get the US involved in what
is a 'crazy move,'" Berri was quoted as saying by Arab dailyAsharq al-Awsat .

He added that there were no guarantees that Israel would not start another war in the region.

In 2006, Israel fought a 33-day war against Lebanon, aimed at destroying Hezbollah's military power but
eventually left the battle scene without achieving any of its objectives.

In August 2006, the United Nations Security Counsel passed Resolution 1701, which called on Israel to
withdraw its troops from Lebanon.

The Lebanese resistance movement has reportedly doubled its military might since its victory over Tel
Aviv in the war.

[ANALYSIS START 'Israel may drag US into new war' OF]

 http://www.last.fm/group/Boycott+Israel/forum/37092/_/490442/1#f10401738

http://www.palestinechronicle.com/art.php?offset=0&browse_category=

Promotion of term “Non Violent Palestinian Reistance” as this is used by

Fundamental Islam.

In reality it seems to be the continuous effort by Anti Jewish and Anti US Interests to
Undermine and even “adopt” the Jewish Holocaust.

Undermining the Importance of the English Language to merely a Tool and apply this
tool on English Speaking Related Populations compare to careful precise use of
Original Middle Eastern Originated Languages seems to be a standard concern of
mainly Fundamental Islamist Media.

'Israel may [or may not] drag US into new war [of hearts
and minds but it also implies an Expanded 1973 War with
Iran and the US as participants.]'

“The Yom Kippur War, Ramadan War or October War (Hebrew: ‫ ;מלחמת יום הכיפורים‬transliterated:
Milẖemet Yom HaKipurim or ‫כיפור יום מלחמת‬, Milẖemet Yom Kipur; Arabic: ‫ ;أكتوبــــــر حرب‬transliterated:
ħarb October or ‫تشــــــرين حرب‬, ħarb Tishrin), also known as the 1973 Arab-Israeli War and the Fourth
Arab-Israeli War, was fought from October 6 to October 26, 1973, between Israel and a coalition of Arab
states backing Egypt and Syria. The war began with a joint surprise attack on Yom Kippur, the holiest
day in Judaism, which coincided with the Muslim holy month of Ramadan. Egypt and Syria respectively
crossed cease-fire lines to enter the Israeli-held Sinai Peninsula and Golan Heights, which had been
captured and occupied since the 1967 Six-Day War. The conflict had all the elements of a severe
international crisis, and ended with a near-confrontation between the two nuclear superpowers, the
United States and the Soviet Union,[19] both of whom launched massive resupply efforts to their allies
during the war. ” - Wikipedia Online

Create a Web Connection that will lead Israel

to an Undeclared War.

The 2006 Lebanon War, also called the 2006

Lebanese Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri
(1938- ) Lebanese politician, and speaker of parliament
since 1992 — the highest political position that a Shi'i
Muslim can have according to the Lebanese constitution.
Berri is effectively (if not formally) one of Lebanon's 3
heads of state, together with the weak Maronite Christian
president Emile Lahoud and the more apt Sunni Muslim
prime minister Rafiq Hariri.
Israel-Hezbollah War and known in Lebanon
as the July War[24] (Arabic: ‫تمــوز فـــي حرب‬, Ḥarb
fi Tammūz) and in Israel as the Second
Lebanon War (Hebrew: ‫מלחמת לבנון השנייה‬,
Milhemet Levanon HaShniya),[25] was a 34-day
military conflict in Lebanon and northern
Israel. The principal parties were Hezbollah
paramilitary forces and the Israeli military. The
conflict started on 12 July 2006, and continued
until a United Nations-brokered ceasefire
went into effect in the morning on 14 August
2006, though it formally ended on 8
September 2006 when Israel lifted its naval
blockade of Lebanon.

Berri has for more than 20 years been one of the strongest
leader of the Shi'is in Lebanon. Actually, however,he has
been little more than a puppet for the rulers in Damascus.
His popularity with the Shi'i groups has dwindled over the
years, and he needs foreign support to remain in his
position. Berri has provoked many fellow Shi'is with his
clearly anti-PLO orientation.

Mr. Berri is reported to have close connections with Syria,

a Close Ally of Iran.

“Lebanese Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri has expressed fears that Israel may attempt to involve
the US in a new aggression against Lebanon or the Gaza Strip.

"Because of Israel's current disagreements with the US, the Israeli side could get the US involved in what
is a 'crazy move, [To the Islamic Public Opinions Mind]'" Berri was quoted as saying by Arab dailyAsharq
al-Awsat . “ – PRESS TV

The United States and Israel are allies along with sharing the same cultural, historical and even religious
background.
The Jewish Community thrives in the United States and in particular in New York City.

“He added that there were no guarantees that Israel would not [dare to] start another war in the region
[Define Region].

In 2006, Israel fought a 33-day [Testing Israeli Enemy’s Dexterity] war against Lebanon [An Arabic
Country with Multinational and Multireligious Population], aimed at destroying Hezbollah's military
power but eventually left the battle scene without achieving any of its objectives.

[1]
“Hezbollah (Arabic: ‫ حزب ﷲ‬ḥizbu-'llāh(i),[2] literally "Party of God") is a Shi'a Islamist
political and paramilitary organisation based in Lebanon.[3] Hezbollah is now also a major
provider of social services, which operate schools, hospitals, and agricultural services for
thousands of Lebanese Shiites, and plays a significant force in Lebanese politics.[4] It is regarded
as a resistance movement throughout much of the Arab and Muslim world.[3] Many
governments, including Arab ones, have condemned actions by Hezbollah while others have
praised the party.[5][6] Several western countries regard it in whole or in part as a terrorist
organization. Hezbollah is also supported by Iran.” - Wikipedia Online

In August 2006, the United Nations Security Counsel passed Resolution 1701 [Number has importance
as a Date in Fundamental Islam since that number does not exist in the Islamic Calendar whose date is
1431H], which called on Israel to withdraw its troops from Lebanon [The 33-day war was presented as an
invasion by most Media. Israel called National Security Reasons and provocation by Hezbollah. The
Good Standing of the Israeli Army is vital for Israel’s Survival in the Middle East].

The Lebanese resistance movement has reportedly doubled its military might since its victory over Tel
Aviv in the war [Withdrawal was perceived as victory. The Precise Military Hardware of Hezbollah is not
known apart from what they present to the eyes of the Ignorant International Opinion about what actually
happens in the Middle East especially after 1982].

[ANALYSIS 'Israel may drag US into new war' END OF]

Iran to replace Persian Gulf radar
Mon, 12 Apr 2010 08:27:40 GMT
Font size :

The new radar systems are slated to be deployed on Iranian ships and vessels in the Persian Gulf.
Iranian scientists are planning to develop domestic radars to replace a series of aging Russian-made
systems currently deployed in the Persian Gulf.

"The systems will be designed and installed chiefly for defense purposes," said Vice President for
Science and Technology, Nasrin Soltankhah, in an interview with Fars News Agency on Saturday.

She added that the new radar systems will also feature capabilities to provide meteorological data for
weather forecasting and analysis.

This comes only a day after Iran announced that the country's first indigenous air defense system,
dubbed Mersad (Ambush), is ready to become operational.

Equipped with sophisticated radar signal processing technology, Mersad features cutting-edge
technology to "destroy modern aircraft at low and medium ranges" and contains exclusive electronic
equipment for guidance and target acquisition.

According to Iranian Defense Minister Ahmad Vahidi, Mersad features capabilities that are superior to
those in the US-made Hawk missile, which Tehran purchased in the 1970s.

The country has already begun mass-producing the new medium-range missile and plans to deliver a
sizeable number to the armed forces by the end of the year.
 [ANALYSIS Iran to replace Persian Gulf radar START OF]

Radar is an object detection

system that uses electromagnetic
waves to identify the range,
altitude, direction, or speed of
both moving and fixed objects
such as aircraft, ships, motor
vehicles, weather formations, and
terrain. The term RADAR was
coined in 1940 by the U.S. Navy as
an acronym for RAdio Detection
Iran to replace Persian Gulf radar And Ranging.[1][2][3][4] The term has
Mon, 12 Apr 2010 08:27:40 GMT
since entered the English language
as a standard word, radar, losing
the capitalization. Radar was
originally called RDF (Range and
Direction Finding) in the United
Kingdom, using the same acronym
as Radio Direction Finding to
preserve the secrecy of its ranging
capability[5].

The new radar systems are slated to be deployed on Iranian ships and vessels [Military or Other Type not defined and if defined the description is
not binding at least to a Reader not affiliated with the Iranian Side] in the Persian (Arab) Gulf.

slate [slayt]
noun (plural slates)
1. layered rock: a fine-grained metamorphic rock that splits easily into
Supposed to be a Civilian Object. layers and is widely used as a roofing material

2. roofing tile: a roofing tile made of slate

Fundamental Islam keeps a rather Mystic
3. writing tablet: a small square piece of slate formerly used for
Approach to Unidentified Flying Objects.
writing on, especially by school students.
It could be wiped clean and reused indefinitely.
“Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps claims
4. identifying board on film set: a board used on a film set to give
it has shot down a UFO over the Persian Gulf.” – information identifying something such as the number of the scene
2009, Wikipedia Online being shot

5. dark grey: a dark grey colour

U.F.O. mostly stands for a UAV or a hostile
Object when it comes to the Iranian Controlled
PRESS.
Is the Current Iranian Leadership hostile to Real
Alien intelligence?
6. North America POLITICS list of candidates: a list of the candidates in
an election
transitive verb (3rd person present singular slates,
present participle slating, past and past participle slated)
1. tile roof with slate: to cover a roof with tiles made of slate
“Iranian scientists are planning to develop domestic radars to replace a series of aging Russian-made
systems currently deployed in the Persian [Arab] Gulf.” – PRESS TV

Iran is pushing Russia to receive the S 300 Anti Aircraft System which was first built in 1979.

"The systems will be designed and installed chiefly for defense purposes, [Such as?]" said Vice President
for Science and Technology, Nasrin Soltankhah, in an interview with Fars [Sea, See Far Away] News
Agency on Saturday.

She added that the new radar systems will also feature capabilities to provide meteorological data for
weather forecasting and analysis [Kind of Hardware that composes the RADAR System not Mentioned].

This comes only a day after Iran announced that the country's first indigenous air defense system,
dubbed Mersad (Ambush), is ready to become operational [The PRESS TV Text does not mention
whether the Iranian RADAR has passed any tests].

Equipped with sophisticated radar signal processing technology, Mersad features cutting-edge
technology to "destroy modern aircraft at low and medium ranges" and contains exclusive electronic
equipment for guidance and target acquisition [Again that leads the reader to the question what is the
need of the S 300 Missile System if iran is capable of creating their own Anti Aircraft Capabilities. Again,
that further leads the reader to the conclusion that Iran is using the S 300 Missile System as a Pressure
Utility against Kremlin indirectly humiliating Russian Federation’s Soviet 1917 – 1991 Image. Russia
keeps good relationships with most Arab States in the region].

According to Iranian Defense Minister Ahmad Vahidi, Mersad features capabilities that are superior to
those in the US-made Hawk missile, which Tehran purchased in the 1970s [PRESS TV tries to avoid
officially and directly insulting Russia while attacking the Usual Enemy of Iran the United States of
America. That also implies that Iran needs the S 300 System while it further implies that an Aircraft with
Stealth Capabilities might have the ability to make an in & out Operations when it comes to Iran’s Non
Transparent Nuclear Program].

The country has already begun mass-producing the new medium-range missile and plans to deliver a
sizeable number to the armed forces by the end of the year [Again no one has a solid Objective Test
Result proving the capabilities the Iranian Army claims. PRESS TV is used as a vehicle to persuade the
Average Mainly Muslim Reader about Iran’s Potentials. It is widely known that Iran reverses nearly every
Western Made Military Technology that falls in their hands to take advantage of the latest advancements
and counter mainly Western Hardware both Civilian and Military deployed in the region now known as the
Persian / Arab Gulf].

[ANALYSIS Iran to replace Persian Gulf radar END OF]

Iran questions IAEA independence

Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:29:46 GMT
Font size :
Iran's envoy to the UN nuclear watchdog, Ali Asghar Soltanieh
Iran's envoy to the UN nuclear watchdog questions the independence of the 35-member body as world
powers push for a new set of sanctions against the country.

Ali-Asghar Soltanieh told Al-Alam late Saturday that “Washington and some of its allies are working to
undermine the independence of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)” in its dealing with Iran's
enrichment activities.

“They lay down the law in New York and expect [the UN nuclear agency in] Vienna to stick to the rules,"
he said.

Soltanieh, who is slated to attend the NPT Review Conference in New York in May, rejected what he
described as "baseless allegations of a hidden Iranian nuclear weapons program.”

“Why would we keep our intentions secret when our nuclear activities are being constantly monitored by
IAEA surveillance cameras?” asked Soltanieh.

“We have always worked in line with our commitments under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT),”
he added.

Soltanieh made the comments at a time when Western superpowers are preparing a new round of UN
sanctions against Iran over its refusal to abandon uranium enrichment.

Western powers accuse Iran of having the intent to develop nuclear weapons in defiance of its
international obligations.

Iran has rejected the allegations, saying that the non-diversion of its nuclear program has been verified by
IAEA inspectors.
[ANALYSIS Iran questions IAEA independence START OF]

Iran questions IAEA in[ter]dependence

Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:29:46 GMT
Font size :

Iran's envoy to the UN nuclear watchdog, Ali Asghar Soltanieh

envoy [én voy]

(plural envoys)
noun
1. official representative: somebody acting as a diplomat on behalf of a
national government or sent as its official messenger

2. envoy extraordinary (plural envoys extraordinary) diplomatic minister:

a minister in the Diplomatic Service of a rank above chargé d'affaires

3. envoi (plural envois) LITERATURE conclusion of literary work: the final

section of a book or play, or a short stanza at the end of a poem, used for
summing up or as a dedication

[Mid-17th century. < French envoyé, past participle of envoyer

'send' < assumed Vulgar Latin inviare 'put on the way' < Latin via
'way']

Iran's envoy [Way] to the UN nuclear watchdog questions [Targets] the in[ter]dependence of the 35-
member [Probably a PRESS TV Error made at will THE IAEA Has 151 Members] [Cell] body as world
powers [Forces in the Body] push [The Body , Implies Evil] for a new set of sanctions [Word Comes from
Sanctum which is Roman] against the country [which is a human like body as the Iranian Islamic
Fundamentalism perceives the State].
Moral dualism is the belief of the great conflict (in eastern and
naturalistic religions) or conflict (in western religions) between the
benevolent and the malignant. Most religious systems have some
form of moral dualism - in western religions, for instance, a conflict
between good and evil. Being a blanket statement, it is quite
antiquated.

Like ditheism/bitheism (see below), moral dualism does not imply

the absence of monist or monotheistic principles. Moral dualism
simply implies that there are two moral opposites at work,
independent of any interpretation of what might be "moral" and -
unlike ditheism/bitheism - independent of how these may be
represented.
Ali-Asghar Soltanieh told Al-Alam late Saturday that “Washington and some of its allies are working to
undermine the independence of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)” in its dealing with Iran's
enrichment activities [A Sign that Iran fears imminent Sanctions despite the Neutral Standing China and
Russia take to avoid potential destabilization actions of Iran in their Interior. SAVAMA is an Iranian Secret
Agency with Cells stationed around the world].

“They lay down the law in New York and expect [the UN nuclear agency in] Vienna to stick to the rules,
[of the game]" he said.

Soltanieh, who is slated [Acousic Distortion implies slaughter] to attend the NPT Review Conference in
New York in May, rejected what he described as "baseless allegations [Iranian predator] of a hidden
Iranian nuclear weapons program. [Stealth Jihad]”

“Why would we keep our intentions secret [if you cannot understand what you see?] when our nuclear
activities are being constantly monitored by IAEA surveillance cameras?” asked Soltanieh.

“We have always worked in line [Played by_passing the Rules] with our commitments under the Nuclear
Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT),” he [Who?] added [Added is used as a Keyword and part of instructions
by PRESS TV Text it could be a signaling message to SAVAMA Agents in the US].

Soltanieh made the comments at a time when Western superpowers are [SAVAMA] preparing [the
ground of] a new round of UN sanctions against Iran [US reversal of sanctions] over its refusal to
abandon uranium enrichment [Also implies control of Nuclei or mass population control in the name of
Social Order and Security].

Western powers accuse Iran of having the intent to develop nuclear weapons [As a safeguard in case the
Iranian methods controlling populations and foreign state decisions with Cheap means fails] in defiance of
its international obligations [Not Defined implies Deals under the table].

Iran has rejected the allegations [Predators of Iranian Logic], saying that the non-diversion [Illusion] of its
nuclear program has been verified by IAEA inspectors [Can a Camera see True Jihad though?].

TREATY

ON THE NON-PROLIFERATION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS

The States concluding this Treaty, hereinafter referred to as the “Parties to the Treaty”,

Considering the devastation that would be visited upon all mankind by a nuclear war and the

consequent need to make every effort to avert the danger of such a war and to take measures to

safeguard the security of peoples,

Believing that the proliferation of nuclear weapons would seriously enhance the danger of

nuclear war,

In conformity with resolutions of the United Nations General Assembly calling for the
conclusion of an agreement on the prevention of wider dis semination of nuclear weapons,

Undertaking to co-operate in facilitating the application of International Atomic Energy

Agency safeguards on peaceful nuclear activities,

Expressing their support for research, development and other efforts to further the

application, within the framework of the International Atomic Energy Agency safeguards

system, of the principle of safeguarding effectively the flow of source and special fissionable

materials by use of instruments and other techniques at certain strategic points,

Affirming the principle that the benefits of peaceful applications of nuclear technology,

including any technological by-products which may be derived by nuclear-weapon States from

the development of nuclear explosive devices, should be available for peaceful purposes to all

Parties to the Treaty, whether nuclear-weapon or non-nuclear-weapon States,

Convinced that, in furtherance of this principle, all Parties to the Treaty are entitled to

participate in the fullest possible exchange of scientific information for, and to contribute alone

or in co-operation with other States to, the further development of the applications of atomic

energy for peaceful purposes,

Declaring their intention to achieve at the earliest possible date the cessation of the nuclear

arms race and to undertake effective measures in the direction of nuclear disarmament,

Urging the co-operation of all States in the attainment of this objective,

INFCIRC/140

Recalling the determination expressed by the Parties to the 1963 Treaty banning nuclear

weapon tests in the atmosphere, in outer space and under water in its Preamble to seek to

achieve the discontinuance of all test explosions of nuclear weapons for all time and to continue

negotiations to this end,

Desiring to further the easing of international tension and the strengthening of trust between

States in order to facilitate the cessation of the manufacture of nuclear weapons, the liquidation
of all their existing stockpiles, and the elimination from national arsenals of nuclear weapons

and the means of their delivery pursuant to a Treaty on general and complete disarmament

under strict and effective international control,

Recalling that, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, States must refrain in

their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or

political independence of any State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the

United Nations, and that the establishment and maintenance of international peace and security

are to be promoted with the least diversion for armaments of the world's human and economic

resources,

Have agreed as follows:

ARTICLE I

Each nuclear-weapon State Party to the Treaty undertakes not to transfer to any recipient

whatsoever nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices or control over such weapons or

explosive devices directly, or indirectly; and not in any way to assist, encourage, or induce any

non-nuclear-weapon State to manufacture or otherwise acquire nuclear weapons or other

nuclear [Nuclei Force Driving People] explosive devices, or control over such weapons or explosive
devices [Man becomes a tool or a slave in fundamental Islam] .

[13th century. Shortening of Old French

esclave < medieval Latin s(c)lavus 'captive',
S(c)lavus 'Slav' < Slavic]

ARTICLE II

Each non-nuclear-weapon State Party to the Treaty undertakes not to receive the transfer

from any transferor whatsoever of nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices or of

control over such weapons or explosive devices directly, or indirectly; not to manufacture or

otherwise acquire nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices; and not to seek or

receive any assistance in the manufacture of nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive
devices.

ARTICLE III

1. Each Non-nuclear-weapon State Party to the Treaty undertakes to accept safeguards, as

set forth in an agreement to be negotiated and concluded with the International Atomic Energy

Agency in accordance with the Statute of the International Atomic Energy Agency and the

Agency's safeguards system, for the exclusive purpose of verification of the fulfilment of its

obligations assumed under this Treaty with a view to preventing diversion of nuclear energy

from peaceful uses to nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices. Procedures for the

safeguards required by this Article shall be followed with respect to source or special

fissionable material whether it is being produced, processed or used in any principal nuclear

facility or is outside any such facility. The safeguards required by this Article shall be applied

on all source or special fissionable material in all peaceful nuclear activities within the territory

of such State, under its jurisdiction, or carried out under its control anywhere.

INFCIRC/140

2. Each State Party to the Treaty undertakes not to provide: (a) source or special fissionable

material, or (b) equipment or material especially designed or prepared for the processing, use or

production of special fissionable material, to any non-nuclear-weapon State for peaceful [As
Internationally perceived, What is the definition of the International Community by Iran? Isn’t the World
interpreted in Strict Islamic Terms] purposes, unless the source or special fissionable material shall be
subject to the safeguards

required by this Article.

3. The safeguards required by this Article shall be implemented in a manner designed to

comply with Article IV of this Treaty, and to avoid hampering the economic or technological

development of the Parties or international co-operation in the field of peaceful nuclear

activities, including the international exchange of nuclear material and equipment for the

processing, use or production of nuclear material for peaceful purposes in accordance with the
provisions of this Article and the principle of safeguarding set forth in the Preamble of the

Treaty.

4. Non-nuclear-weapon States Party to the Treaty shall conclude agreements with the

International Atomic Energy Agency to meet the requirements of this Article either individually

or together with other States in accordance with the Statute of the International Atomic Energy

Agency. Negotiation of such agreements shall commence within 180 days from the original

entry into force of this Treaty. For States depositing their instruments of ratification or

accession after the 180-day period, negotiation of such agreements shall commence not later

than the date of such deposit. Such agreements shall enter into force not later than eighteen

months after the date of initiation of negotiations.

ARTICLE IV

1. Nothing in this Treaty shall be interpreted as affecting the inalienable right of all the

Parties to the Treaty to develop research, production and use of nuclear energy for peaceful [The Middle
East is in a state of Limbo (Not War nor Peace) the last 30 years or so]

purposes without discrimination and in conformity with Articles I and II of this Treaty.

2. All the Parties to the Treaty undertake to facilitate, and have the right to participate in. the

fullest possible exchange of equipment, materials and scientific and technological information

for the peaceful uses of nuclear energy. Parties to the Treaty in a position to do so shall also cooperate

in contributing alone or together with other States or international organizations to the

further development of the applications of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, especially in

the territories of non-nuclear-weapon States Party to the Treaty, with due consideration for the

needs of the developing areas of the world.

ARTICLE V

Each Party to the Treaty undertakes to take appropriate measures to ensure that, in

accordance with this Treaty, under appropriate international observation and through

appropriate international procedures, potential benefits from any peaceful applications of

nuclear explosions will be made available to non-nuclear-weapon States Party to the Treaty on a

non-discriminatory basis and that the charge to such Parties for the explosive devices used will

be as low as possible and exclude any charge for research and development. Non-nuclearweapon

States Party to the Treaty shall be able to obtain such benefits, pursuant to a special

international agreement or agreements, through an appropriate international body with adequate

representation of non-nuclear-weapon States. Negotiations on this subject shall commence as

soon as possible after the Treaty enters into force. Non-nuclear-weapon States Party to the

Treaty so desiring may also obtain such benefits pursuant to bilateral agreements.

INFCIRC/140

ARTICLE VI

Each of the Parties to the Treaty undertakes to pursue negotiations in good [Islamic?] faith on effective

measures relating to cessation of the nuclear arms race at an early date and to nuclear

disarmament, and on a treaty on general and complete disarmament under strict and effective

international control.

ARTICLE VII

Nothing in this Treaty affects the right of any group of States to conclude regional treaties in

order to assure the total absence of nuclear weapons in their respective territories.

ARTICLE VIII

1. Any Party to the Treaty may propose amendments to this Treaty. The text of any

proposed [Islamic?] amendment shall be submitted to the Depositary Governments which shall circulate
it

to all Parties to the Treaty. Thereupon, if requested to do so by one-third or more of the Parties

to the Treaty, the Depositary Governments shall convene a conference, to which they shall

invite all the Parties to the Treaty, to consider such an amendment.

2. Any amendment to this Treaty must be approved by a majority of the votes of all the
Parties to the Treaty, including the votes of all nuclear-weapon States Party to the Treaty and all

other Parties which, on the date the amendment is circulated, are members of the Board of

Governors of the International Atomic Energy Agency. The amendment shall enter into force

for each Party that deposits its instrument of ratification of the amendment upon the deposit of

such instruments of ratification by a majority of all the Parties, including the instruments of

ratification of all nuclear-weapon States Party to the Treaty and all other Parties which, on the

date the amendment is circulated, are members of the Board of Governors of the International

Atomic Energy Agency. Thereafter, it shall enter into force for any other Party upon the deposit

of its instrument of ratification of the amendment.

3. Five years after the entry into force of this Treaty, a conference of Parties to the Treaty

shall be held in Geneva, Switzerland, in order to review the operation of this Treaty with a view

to assuring that the purposes of the Preamble and the provisions of the Treaty are being realised.

At intervals of five years thereafter. a majority of the Parties to the Treaty may obtain, by

submitting a proposal to this effect to the Depositary Governments, the convening of further

conferences with the same objective of reviewing the operation of the Treaty.

ARTICLE IX

1. This Treaty shall be open to all States for signature. Any State which does not sign the

Treaty before its entry into force in accordance with paragraph 3 of this Article may accede to it

at any time.

2. This Treaty shall be subject to ratification by signatory States [Iran signed the Treaty when the shah
was still in Power]. Instruments of ratification

and instruments of accession shall be deposited with the Governments of the United Kingdom

of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the United

States of America, which are hereby designated the Depositary Governments.

3. This Treaty shall enter into force after its ratification by the States, the Governments of

which are designated Depositaries of the Treaty, and forty other States signatory to this Treaty
and the deposit of their instruments of ratification. For the purposes of this Treaty, a nuclear weapon

State is one which has manufactured and exploded a nuclear weapon or other nuclear

explosive device prior to 1 January, 1967 [Indirectly it allows Iran to possess Nuclear Weapons without
being called a Nuclear Weapon State assuming that the design of the Nuclear Weapon is that precise
and tested by Other Nuclear Weapon States that it does not need any Local Iranian Testing. That
keeps Iran typically legal to the NPT while being ready to confront the United States in the long run on
Equal Terms in case of a Full Scale War while the United States will be the Aggressor. These NPT Lines
allow Iran to acquire Information related to a Nuclear weapon coming from an enemy State like the
United States of America].

INFCIRC/140

4. For States whose instruments of ratification or accession are deposited subsequent to the

entry into force of this Treaty, it shall enter into force on the date of the deposit of their

instruments of ratification or accession.

5. The Depositary Governments shall promptly inform all signatory and acceding States of

the date of each signature, the date of deposit of each instrument of ratification or of accession,

the date of the entry into force of this Treaty, and the date of receipt of any requests for

convening a conference or other notices.

6. This Treaty shall be registered by the Depositary Governments pursuant to Article 102 of

the Charter of the United Nations.

ARTICLE X

1. Each Party shall in exercising its national sovereignty have the right to withdraw from the

Treaty if it decides that extraordinary events, related to the subject matter of this Treaty, have

jeopardized the supreme interests of its country. It shall give notice of such withdrawal to all

other Parties to the Treaty and to the United Nations Security Council three months in advance.

Such notice shall include a statement of the extraordinary events it regards as having

jeopardized its supreme interests.

2. Twenty-five years after the entry into force of the Treaty, a conference shall be convened

to decide whether the Treaty shall continue in force indefinitely, or shall be extended for an
additional fixed period or periods. This decision shall be taken by a majority of the Parties to the

Treaty.

ARTICLE XI

This Treaty, the English, Russian, French, Spanish and Chinese texts of which are equally

authentic, shall be deposited in the archives of the Depositary Governments. Duly certified

copies of this Treaty shall be transmitted by the Depositary Governments to the Governments of

the signatory and acceding States.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned, duly authorised, have signed this Treaty.

DONE in triplicate, at the cities of London, Moscow and Washington, the first day of July,

one thousand nine hundred and sixty-eight [Christian Gregorian Calendar Date. The Islamic Calendar is
widely enforced by Fundamental Islam in Iran while the Zoroastrian One is mostly used as a Cultural Link
throughout Central Asia among Countries with same Iranian Cultural Background].

The NPT Treaty reversed can quite enlightening about Iran’s Long Term Intentions when read under a
Different Prism.

[ANALYSIS Iran questions IAEA independence END OF]