Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Generators
Embedded Generation Interface
Protection (EGIP)
Stephen Walsh
Liaison Group 7th February 2012
Current position
Protection at the interface with embedded generation
ESB Distribution Standard 931030 Parallel Operation of Private
Generators, August 1995.
Requirements and settings were subsequently embedded in the
Conditions Governing document issued to customers (G10)
Specific issues addressed in individual protection studies
In the interim
Huge increase of the number and size of Generators on the ESBN
system
Moving from a passive system to an active system
The operating landscape has changed significantly
Improved modelling of fault response
Drive for sustainability e.g. Facilitation of Renewables (FoR 2020).
ENTSO-E Code
European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity
Wind Connections MW
11,158
6,610
3,990
1,260
1,360
Connected
Contracted
Gate 3
Connected
Post Gate 3
In
Queue
Issues reviewed
Considered the impact on Distribution protection
Low short circuit current contributions from some Generators
Connection voltage different protection schemes in use on the ESBN
110kV, 38kV, 20kV & 10kV networks
ESBN own and control interface breaker and protection*
Replacement of directional
overcurrent protection at MV
Review showed directional overcurrent protection is not reliable
with some modern Wind Generators
Interface Breaker
Volts
Freq
RoCoF
= Breaker with
disconnect & earths
ESBN CB
IPP CB
Impedance
Under-Volts
Differential
Reduce tripping time from 30-45s to 5s for EGIP NVD protection as follows:
Systems operated with Isolated Neutral and EFT (e.g. urban 10kV systems)
EGIP protection will indicate only (rather than trip) for single phase earth faults on the
following systems:
Systems operated with Isolated Neutral and FPE (e.g. rural 10kV systems)
Again this supports the national sustainability drive under the Facilitation of Renewables
(FoR 2020)
Anti-Islanding
Anti-Islanding is also called Loss Of Mains protection.
Currently this is done using RoCoF relays (Rate of Change of Frequency) or Vector Shift relays. The
settings of these pose a system wide risk if there are large numbers on at the same time.
The new increased settings will significantly reduce this risk. Also at 110kV we plan to use Special
Protection Schemes which monitor connections in the local area.
Generator technology
0.4Hz/s - 0.6Hz/s
0.6Hz/s - 2.0Hz/s
0.4Hz/s - 0.6Hz/s
2.0Hz/s
N/A
2.0Hz/s
0.4Hz/s - 0.6Hz/s
2.0Hz/s
0.4Hz/s - 0.6Hz/s
0.6Hz/s
0.4Hz/s - 0.6Hz/s
Synchronous
Under-Voltage:
Over-Voltage:
Under-Frequency:
Over-Frequency
Voltage
< 0.87pu
< 0.80pu
> 1.12pu
Trip Time
3.0s
1.1s
0.7s
OLD
<0.90pu; <1s
---------------->1.10pu; <1s
Frequency
<= 47.5 Hz
<= 47.0Hz
>= 52.0Hz
>= 52.5Hz
Trip Time
20s
0.5s
20s
0.5s
OLD
<48.0Hz; <1s
---------------->50.5Hz; <1s
-----------------
New
Old
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES (SPS)
YES
Impedance
YES
NO/study
Earth Fault
TRIP/ALARM
TRIP
YES
NO/study
Loss of Mains
Differential
(cabled interconnections)
EGIP at MV
Protection type
New
Old
YES
YES
YES
YES
Loss of Mains
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
TRIP/ALARM
TRIP
Earth Fault
Summary of Improvements
Better continuity for generators
Fault clearing
Impedance more reliable than overcurrent
ESBN own/control fault switching @ interface
Faster clearing of Earth Faults
Q&A