Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
TECHNICAL PAPER
INTRODUCTION
In recent years, research on fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP)
composite grids has demonstrated that these products may be as
practical and cost-effective as reinforcements for concrete
structures.1-5 FRP grid reinforcement offers several advantages
in comparison with conventional steel reinforcement and FRP
reinforcing bars. FRP grids are prefabricated, noncorrosive, and
lightweight systems suitable for assembly automation and ideal
for reducing field installation and maintenance costs. Research
on constructability issues and economics of FRP reinforcement
cages for concrete members has shown the potential of
these reinforcements to reduce life-cycle costs and significantly
increase construction site productivity.6
Three-dimensional FRP composite grids provide a mechanical
anchorage within the concrete due to intersecting elements, and
thus no bond is necessary for proper load transfer. This type of
reinforcement provides integrated axial, flexural, and shear
reinforcement, and can also provide a concrete member with
the ability to fail in a pseudoductile manner. Continuing
research is being conducted to fully understand the behavior of
composite grid reinforced concrete to commercialize its use
and gain confidence in its design for widespread structural
applications. For instance, there is a need to predict the correct
failure mode of composite grid reinforced concrete beams
where there is significant flexural-shear cracking.7 This type
of information is critical for the development of design
guidelines for FRP grid reinforced concrete members.
Current flexural design methods for FRP reinforced concrete
beams are analogous to the design of concrete beams using
conventional reinforcement.8 The geometrical shape, ductility,
modulus of elasticity, and force transfer characteristics of FRP
composite grids, however, are likely to be different than
250
developed in the shear span near the load points. The study
concluded that further research was needed to obtain a better
understanding of the stress state in the longitudinal reinforcement at failure to predict the correct capacity and failure
modes of the beams.
Further experimental tests on concrete beams reinforced
with three-dimensional FRP composite grids were conducted to
investigate the behavior and performance of the grids when
used to reinforce beams that develop significant flexural-shear
cracking.7 Different composite grid configurations were
designed to study the influence of the FRP grid components
(longitudinal bars, vertical bars, and transverse bars) on the
load-deflection behavior and failure modes. Even though failure
modes of the beams were different depending upon the
characteristics of the composite grid, all beams failed in their
shear spans. Failure modes included splitting and rupture of
the main longitudinal bars and shear-out failure of the
vertical bars. Research results concluded that the design
of concrete beams with composite grid reinforcements must
account for failure of the main bars in the shear span.
A second phase of this experimental research was performed
by Ozel and Bank5 to investigate the capacity and failure modes
of composite grid reinforced concrete beams with different shear
span-to-effective depth ratios. Three different shear spandepth ratios (a/d) were investigated, with values of 3, 4.5, and 6,
respectively.11 The data obtained from this recently completed
experimental study was compared with the finite element results
obtained in the present study.
Experimental studies have shown that due to the development of large cracks in the FRP-reinforced concrete beams,
most of the deformation takes place at a relatively small
number of cracks between rigid bodies.12 A schematic of this
behavior is shown in Fig. 2. As a result, beams with relatively
small shear span-depth ratios typically fail due to rupture of the
main FRP longitudinal reinforcement at large flexural-shear
cracks, even though they are over-reinforced according to
conventional flexural design procedures.5,7,13,14 Due to the
aforementioned behavior for beams reinforced with composite
grids, especially those that exhibit significant flexural-shear
cracking, it is postulated that the longitudinal bars in the
member are subjected to a uniform tensile stress distribution,
plus a nonuniform stress distribution due to localized rotations at large cracks, which can be of great importance in
determining the ultimate flexural strength of the beam. The
present study investigates the stress-state at the flexuralshear cracks in the main longitudinal bars, using explicit
finite element tools to simulate this behavior and determine
the conditions that will cause failure in the beam.
ACI Structural Journal/March-April 2003
Fig. 3Finite element model for composite grid reinforced concrete beam.
26.7 GPa
Xt
266.8 MPa
151.0 MPa
Ey
14.6 GPa
Yt
Gxy
3.6 GPa
Sc
6.9 MPa
xy
0.26
Xc
177.9 MPa
0.5
Yc
302.0 MPa
were observed in the short beam, which would imply that this
model does not exhibit significant flexural-shear damage. For
this model, the finite element analysis slightly over-predicted
both the stiffness and the ultimate load value obtained from
the experiment. On the other hand, the ultimate deflection
was under-predicted. Failure in this model was also caused
by rupture of the longitudinal bars at a location near the load
points. In the experimental test, failure was caused by a
combination of rupture in the longitudinal bars as well as
concrete crushing in the compression zone. This compressive
failure was located near the load points, however, and
could have been initiated by cracks formed due to stress
concentrations produced by the rigid loading plates. 11
Figure 8 shows the results for the long beam model.
Comparing this simulation with the two previous ones, it
can be seen that this model exhibits the least shear damage,
as expected. As a result, the longitudinal bars exhibit a
parabolic shape, which would be the behavior predicted
using conventional moment-curvature methods based on the
curvature of the member. Once again, the stiffness of the
beam was slightly over-predicted. However, the ultimate load
ACI Structural Journal/March-April 2003
Finite
element
analysis
Flexural
analysis
Finite
element
analysis
Beam
Experimental
Flexural
analysis
Short
215.7
196.2
215.3
90.7
51.6
Medium
143.2
130.8
161.9
90.7
76.5
Long
108.1
97.9
113.0
90.7
76.5
Mn Mu
(1)
(2)
Af ff
a = ------------- 1 f c b
(3)
1 d a
f f = E f cu ----------------a
(4)
(5)
Beam
Experimental
ultimate
Theoretical shear
shear, kN
critical, kN
Experimental
Short
108.1
88.1
Mn = t ie + m
216
199
70.7
Medium
71.6
88.1
Mn = Af f f (d a/ 2)
143
131
90.7
88.1
Mn = Af f f (d a/2)
109
99
90.7
Long
54.7
Vs a
t = ---------------------s
ni e
(6)
(7)
Vs
7 f Ef 1
--- f bd
= ----------------90 1 f c 6 c
(8)
crit
(9)
(10)
NOTATION
a
as
b
d
=
=
=
=
Ef
Ex
Ey
Gxy
f c
ff
ie
Mn
m
n
Sc
t
Vscrit
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
Vult
Xc
Xt
Yc
Yt
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
cu
f
xy
=
=
=
258
REFERENCES
1. Sugita, M., NEFMACGrid Type Reinforcement, Fiber-ReinforcedPlastic (FRP) Reinforcement for Concrete Structures: Properties and
Applications, Developments in Civil Engineering, A. Nanni, ed., Elsevier,
Amsterdam, V. 42, 1993, pp. 355-385.
2. Schmeckpeper, E. R., and Goodspeed, C. H., Fiber-Reinforced
Plastic Grid for Reinforced Concrete Construction, Journal of Composite
Materials, V. 28, No. 14, 1994, pp. 1288-1304.
3. Bank, L. C.; Frostig, Y.; and Shapira, A., Three-Dimensional FiberReinforced Plastic Grating Cages for Concrete Beams: A Pilot Study, ACI
Structural Journal, V. 94, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 1997, pp. 643-652.
4. Smart, C. W., and Jensen, D. W., Flexure of Concrete Beams
Reinforced with Advanced Composite Orthogrids, Journal of Aerospace
Engineering, V. 10, No. 1, Jan. 1997, pp. 7-15.
5. Ozel, M., and Bank, L. C., Behavior of Concrete Beams Reinforced
with 3-D Composite Grids, CD-ROM Paper No. 069. Proceedings of the
16th Annual Technical Conference, American Society for Composites,
Virginia Tech, Va., Sept. 9-12, 2001.
6. Shapira, A., and Bank, L. C., Constructability and Economics of FRP
Reinforcement Cages for Concrete Beams, Journal of Composites for
Construction, V. 1, No. 3, Aug. 1997, pp. 82-89.
7. Bank, L. C., and Ozel, M., Shear Failure of Concrete Beams Reinforced
with 3-D Fiber Reinforced Plastic Grids, Fourth International Symposium on
Fiber Reinforced Polymer Reinforcement for Reinforced Concrete Structures,
SP-188, C. Dolan, S. Rizkalla, and A. Nanni, eds., American Concrete
Institute, Farmington Hills, Mich., 1999, pp. 145-156.
8. ACI Committee 440, Guide for the Design and Construction of
Concrete Reinforced with FRP Bars (ACI 440.1R-01), American Concrete
Institute, Farmington Hills, Mich., 2001, 41 pp.
9. Nakagawa, H.; Kobayashi. M.; Suenaga, T.; Ouchi, T.; Watanabe, S.;
and Satoyama, K., Three-Dimensional Fabric Reinforcement, FiberReinforced-Plastic (FRP) Reinforcement for Concrete Structures: Properties
and Applications, Developments in Civil Engineering, V. 42, A. Nanni, ed.,
Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1993, pp. 387-404.
10. Yonezawa, T.; Ohno, S.; Kakizawa, T.; Inoue, K.; Fukata, T.; and
Okamoto, R., A New Three-Dimensional FRP Reinforcement, FiberReinforced-Plastic (FRP) Reinforcement for Concrete Structures: Properties
and Applications, Developments in Civil Engineering, V. 42, A. Nanni, ed.,
Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1993, pp. 405-419.
11. Ozel, M., Behavior of Concrete Beams Reinforced with 3-D
Fiber Reinforced Plastic Grids, PhD thesis, University of WisconsinMadison, 2002.
12. Lees, J. M., and Burgoyne, C. J., Analysis of Concrete Beams with
Partially Bonded Composite Reinforcement, ACI Structural Journal,
V. 97, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 2000, pp. 252-258.
13. Shehata, E.; Murphy, R.; and Rizkalla, S., Fiber Reinforced
Polymer Reinforcement for Concrete Structures, Fourth International
Symposium on Fiber Reinforced Polymer Reinforcement for Reinforced
Concrete Structures, SP-188, C. Dolan, S. Rizkalla, and A. Nanni, eds.,
American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Mich., 1999, pp. 157-167.
14. Guadagnini, M.; Pilakoutas, K.; and Waldron, P., Investigation on
Shear Carrying Mechanisms in FRP RC Beams, FRPRCS-5, FibreReinforced Plastics for Reinforced Concrete Structures, Proceedings of the
Fifth International Conference, C. J. Burgoyne, ed., V. 2, Cambridge, July
16-18, 2001, pp. 949-958.
15. Cook, R. D.; Malkus, D. S.; and Plesha, M. E., Concepts and
Applications of Finite Element Analysis, 3rd Edition, John Wiley &
Sons, N.Y., 1989, 832 pp.
16. Altair Computing, HyperMesh Version 2.0 Users Manual, Altair
Computing Inc., Troy, Mich., 1995.
17. Thompson, W. T., and Dahleh, M. D., Theory of Vibration with
Applications, 5th Edition, Prentice Hall, N.J., 1998, 524 pp.
18. Malvar, L. J.; Crawford, J. E.; Wesevich, J. W.; and Simons, D., A
Plasticity Concrete Material Model for DYNA3D, International Journal
of Impact Engineering, V. 19, No. 9/10, 1997, pp. 847-873.
19. Tavarez, F. A., Simulation of Behavior of Composite Grid Reinforced
Concrete Beams Using Explicit Finite Element Methods, MS thesis, University
of Wisconsin-Madison, 2001.
20. Hallquist, J. O., LS-DYNA Keyword Users Manual, Livermore
Software Technology Corporation, Livermore, Calif., Apr. 2000.