Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
IRMS-P-75-23-00
ISSUE 0
Dandilion prepared by Engineering Ltda. Date Elabor. July 2011
Approved by F. Arrieta Date PASS. Sept. 2011
Authorized by J. Gonzlez Date Implem. Nov. 2011
Change control
No.
Mod. Date
Mod. Scope Modification No. Page. Presented Approved
1. OBJECTIVE
Establish the activities through which Electrogas develop the tasks associated with
the direct examinations of their pipelines to detect internal corrosion. This
procedure does not apply to the pipeline.
It comprising internal corrosion chemical corrosion mechanisms and microbially
influenced corrosion (MIC: microbiologically influenced corrosion).
2. SCOPE
The procedure is applied in the implementation activities of the inspection plan
when the inspection is of direct type and when seeking to determine the extent of
the threat of internal corrosion.
Activities associated with the direct examination for internal corrosion (ICDA)
consists of four stages: 1) pre assessment and identification of ICDA regions, 2)
indirect inspection, 3) determination of excavation sites and direct inspection of the
pipeline, and 4) post evaluation and monitoring.
The results obtained by applying the ICDA method will be used to establish further
actions to improve operational procedures and inform the process of analysis and
decision of the inspection plan.
This procedure applies to the Operations and the wholeElectrogas Transportation
System.
Charge Integrity Management is responsible for the smooth operation of the
process, ensuring adequate staff training and participation associated with it.
Responsible for the implementation of the procedure is the Chief Operating Officer.
Direct to detect internal corrosion examinations are carried out by a specialized
service provider for this purpose.
twenty-one. Normative reference
This procedure complies with the following rules.
Procedure "Direct Examination of Internal Corrosion in Pipelines (ICDA)"
Page 4 of 17 Edition: 3-P-75-23-00 SGIR
Article 18.5: In the case of metal pipes they must be inspected, while in service with
the methods laid down in the ANSI / ASME B31.8S Code - 2004, "Managing System
Integrity of Gas Pipelines"
Article 20.7 d)The network integrity program must have the definition of methods
for assessing integrity of networks and the procedures for their application.
Article 19: The results of the inspections of the pipes must be reported to the
Superintendency, by the procedures established for this purpose.
Section 192 927: What are the requirements for using ICDA?
Letter a) Definition: ICDA is a process to identify along the pipeline locations where
they could reside fluid or electrolyte (introduced into the system during normal
operation or special conditions) and where internal corrosion is most likely to exist.
Letter b) General requirements: The ICDA applies only nominally dry pipelines
transporting natural gas, this is a flow of gas which nominally does not contain any
type of electrolyte.
Letter c) Plan ICDA: The operator must establish and follow a plan to develop the
ICDA to cover the stages of pre assessment, identification of ICDA regions; definition
of excavation sites and direct inspection of the pipeline, and post evaluation and
monitoring.
3. RELATED DOCUMENTS
3.1. Rules:
D.S. 280_2010: Safety Regulations for Transport andGas Distribution Network.
49 CFR.192_2007: Minimum Standards Network SecurityGas.
ANSI / ASME B31.8S_2004: Pipeline Integrity Management
GRI 02-0057: "Internal Corrosion Direct Assessment of Gas Transmission Pipelines
-Methodology" mandatory standard reference under 49 CFR 192 927,
Standard: SP NACE 0206 - 2006: "Internal Corrosion Direct Assessment
Methodology for Pipelines Carrying Normally Dry Natural Gas".
3.2. procedures:
3.3. instructional:
4. TERMINOLOGY
5. DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITIES
5.1. GENERAL
This procedure describes the necessary procedure for the implementation of direct
examination of internal pipeline corrosion activities.
Analysis gas, liquid or solid, particularly H2S, CO2; O2, and chloride free water)
bacterial cultures results,
corrosion sensing elements: coupons, samples, etc.,
operating parameters, particularly pressure and flow rate, especially periods of
low or no flow.
Evidence that internal corrosion has been the cause of past incidents,
If it is proved that section analysis never contained water or other electrolyte and
that there was no event due to internal corrosion, then the ICDA examination is not
required.
Electrogas considered as a basis for applying this method the lines of the standards
49 CFR 192 927 letter c); ANSI / ASME B31.8S Annex B2, not mandatory and NACE
SP0206.
Without limiting the foregoing may be used more detailed and / or variations to the
above specifications according to the particular case that either analyze or own
specifications ICDA service provider.
At this stage you must collect and integrate the information needed to evaluate the
feasibility of using the ICDA method to support the use of a particular model to
identify the locations of possible accumulation of electrolytes (liquids) along the
pipeline, identifying the ICDA regions, and potential entry points to the system
liquid.
ii) Information to support the selection of the model identification points of fluid
accumulation, among other: points of entry and exit of gas; location of all the low
points of the pipeline loops, earrings, dead ends, valves, manifolds, traps, etc .;
pipeline profile with sufficient detail to calculate the slope of each segment of the
pipeline; the diameter of the pipeline and the range of expected speeds.
iv) information segments where unused cleaning pigs or where they may have
deposited liquids.
The operator must analyze the information collected to determine if the method is
applicable or not. To do this, consider the following:
The operator must identify all ICDA regions. The ICDA regions extending from the
point where it enters the fluid including the rest of the product (downstream) where
internal corrosion may occur.
Income / expenses include fluid flow direction. For products having or have had bidirectional flow, ICDA regions should be established for each direction of flow and
evaluated independently.
To define regions ICDA should also consider changes in process variables (such as
temperature and pressure). These changes can be treated as:
In identifying segments the operator must use the model set out in GRI - 02-0057:
"Internal Corrosion Direct Assessment of Gas Transmission Pipelines - Methodology".
This model or equivalent are used to define the critical angle of the pipeline on
which the liquid film can not be carried by the gas.
Electrogas defined as an alternative model to model GRI indicated above, the model
set out in SP NACE 0206 - 2006: "Internal Corrosion Direct Assessment Methodology
for Pipelines Carrying Normally Dry Natural Gas".
In which:
- Critical : critical angle over which the liquid is not transported by the gas flow,
- l: liquid density,
- g: gas density,
- G: acceleration of gravity,
- Did: inner diameter of the pipeline,
- Vg superficial gas velocity
- All parameters must be in units
consistent.
- Consideration should be given the compressibility factor (Z) in the calculation of
the appropriate parameters.
In which:
- g: gas density,
- P: absolute pressure gas flow (MPag),
- MW: molecular weight of gas (assuming 100%
Methane: MW = 16 g / g-mol);
- Z: compressibility factor,
- R: universal gas constant: 8.314 Pa m3 / g-mol / K,
- T: Temperature of the gas flow ( K).
The calculations must be performed for all the operational history of the pipeline
and flow bi - directional in case it occurs or has occurred.
Once the critical angles calculated torque different operational conditions, they
must be compared with the different angles of the product (i):
For those cases where i critical, you have a possible point of accumulation of
fluid, ie a location ICDA.
The ICDA locations are determined by the analysis of information from Step 1: pre
evaluation and analysis of critical angles.
The operator should identify the locations where ICDA greater possibility of internal
corrosion exists. In this process the operator must identify at least two (2) locations
to be excavated and inspected within each region ICDA.
One of the two (2) points to be inspected must necessarily be the lowest point of
the ICDA locations and the following points should be a point closer to the bottom
end of the ICDA region waters.
If the ICDA region there were higher angles the critical angle, then you must select
the largest angle in the region. If it existed corrosion should check the next largest
angle. If there were no corrosion should likewise verify the following for the
validation of the method.
The method validation shall follow the guidelines of ANSI / ASME B31.8S Annex B2:
The operator must make at least two direct inspections in locations with
accumulation points electrolyte (i critical) determined in the above and where
the angles are smaller than the critical angle (i < critical). If these locations are
found to be free from corrosion, then the method is confirmed safe.
Thus validation is effective when two successive direct inspection it is found that
there is no corrosion. With this, all the ICDA region analyzed is accepted as free
from the threat of corrosion.
5.2.3.3 Response
i) To assess the severity of the defect (remaining strength) and act accordingly.
You should use one of the following criteria to determine if the corrosion is found
significant:
Corrosion is considered significant if the remaining wall thickness is less than the
nominal minimum wall thickness, based on tolerance wall specified in the standard
manufacturing,
An analysis of specific engineering which should consider prior metal loss and
years of service of the pipeline,
ii) Whenever loss of wall should be calculate the remaining strength of the product
in those locations, using ASME B31G,
iii) As part of the direct examination ICDA in the process, make additional direct
inspections of the ICDA region through the subdivision of the region into subregions, using the same methodology of this process, or verify the validity or not to
use another method inspection method,
iv) To evaluate the potential for internal corrosion throughout the product similar to
the ICDA certain characteristic regions, where this has been done only for a
segment of the pipeline.
The ICDA plan should contain provisions for evaluating the effectiveness of the
method and to monitor the segments where internal corrosion is detected.
Within a period not exceeding one year the operator must evaluate the
effectiveness of the method as a useful tool for addressing the threat of internal
corrosion and determine whether a particular segment should be re evaluated in a
shorter period than those established by the "Procedure Development Plan Update
and Pipeline Inspection ".
If corrosion is found, then the method by which the critical angle must be re -rated
estimated.
You must set the frequency of monitoring and analyzing fluid based on all available
integrity assessments and specific risk factors of each pipeline segment.
- Carry out direct inspections downstream of the point where the electrolyte may
have entered the pipeline, or
- Assess the segment using one of the other methods laid down in the inspection
plan.
5.2.5 Records
Then the records to be stored and / or to generate in each of the steps of the
method are detailed. All decisions taken during its development must be properly
documented. Records must be maintained throughout the life of the product.
b) Indirect Inspection
- Locations geo referenced the beginning and end of each region ICDA,
- Procedures for establishing the accuracy of the profiles of the pipeline,
c) direct inspections
d) Post Evaluation
- The results and the method of calculation of remaining life, determining the
maximum size of damage remaining, and calculation of the rate of corrosion,
- Determination, justification and validation period of re-evaluation (re-inspection)
- Criteria used to evaluate the effectiveness of the method and its results: criteria,
data and information of the periodic evaluations.
When first applied ICDA Direct Examination, should be considered more restrictive
conditions than the minimum established by the method and then make them less
demanding as experience is gained in the implementation of the method.
All activities associated with the direct examination ICDA be made in order to
minimize security risks to property and people, and environmental risks and for
which guidelines apply:
Once completed the direct examination report ICDA and established the plan of
action, the results of the inspection to the competent authority, SEC or other be
informed, in accordance with procedures established by it.
6 REGISTRATION OF QUALITY
The following documents are defined as quality records in order to provide pursuant
to Clause 7.2 of ISO 9001: 2008.
These will be stored in accordance to what stated in the GER-P42-03-00-0 "Record Control".
FIRST NAME
CODE
LOCATION TYPE O FILE RETENTION TIME