Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Hsu',
Yu-Jiun
Ren
and
Kai
Chang
Abstract
A new dual-frequency dual-polarized array antenna for airborne applications is presented in this paper. Two planar arrays
with thin substrates (RIT Ouroid 5880 substrate, with e; = 2.2 and a thickness of 0.13 mm) are integrated to provide
simultaneous operation at S band (3 GHz) and X band (10 GHz). Each 3 GHz antenna element is a large rectangular ringresonator antenna, and has a 9.5 dBi gain that is about 3 dB higher than the gain of an ordinary ring antenna. The 10 GHz
antenna elements are circular patches. They are combined to form the array with a gain of 18.3 dBi, using a series-fed
structure to save the space of the feeding line network. The ultra-thin array can be easily placed on an aircraft's fuselage, due
to its lightweight and conformal structure. It will be useful for wireless communication, radar, remote sensing, and surveillance
applications.
Keywords: Antenna arrays; microstrip arrays; microwave antenna arrays; aircraft antennas; planar arrays; polarization
1. Introduction
Magzine,
= 63 = 2.2)
and a foam
2. Array Design
Unlike most other elements, the electrical parameters of the
substrate will be affected by the temperature and moisture variations occurring in airborne applications, and these affect the
performance of the antennas. The magnitude of the transmitting
power may also generate a large amount of heat, which results in a
significantly increased temperature. The choice of the substrate is
therefore an important factor in airborne-antenna design. The
configuration of the antenna element determines the complexity of
the array feeding-line network, which controls the size and mass of
the array. The configuration of the feeding-line networks may also
incur different levels of port isolation and pattern polarization.
Important design considerations of a dual-polarized airborne array
antenna are summarized in Table I. Our goal is to design a lowmass conformal array antenna for airborne applications. An ultrathin substrate is used to achieve the conformal antenna.
The multilayer array structure for dual-band (S band and X
band) operation is shown in Figure I. The S-band antenna elements
sit on the top layer, and the X-band antennas are on the bottom
layer. A foam layer (h 2 ) serves as the spacer, and is sandwiched
between the two substrate layers. One of the important design
considerations for this multilayer dual-band array is that the S-band
antenna element should be nearly transparent to the X-band
antenna elements. Otherwise, the S-band element may degrade the
performance of the X-band antenna.
D
y.
x
Figure 1. The multilayer structure of the dual-band dualpolarized array antenna.
noitag porP
Authorized licensd use limted to: IE Xplore. Downlade on May 13,20 at 1:4738 UTC from IE Xplore. Restricon aply.
enizag M
Impact
This is determined by the aerial conditions and delivered power, which will affect the electrical
parameters ofthe substrate.
The effects due to moisture are similar to the temperature effects.
This controls the antenna's nerformance and is mainly changed by large temperature variations.
This determines the complexity of the array. Unsuitable antenna elements could result in a bulky
and heavy array.
Port-to-port isolation and cross-polarization level can be enhanced by using well-designed
feeing-line networks, such as proximity/aperture coupling and multilayer configurations.
For dual-frequency operation, the interference between antennas operating at different
frequencies may affect radiation patterns and gain.
, Vol. 51, No.4, August 2009
71
'lL--- ----
with
= 8.79r J ( / I
F:)
, 2R ,
-;---
L"
H-port
<,
f:O::::_'!:t------------------- -------------------
(2)
where Or and h (in em) are the relative dielectric constant and
thickness of the substrate, respectively. At the operating frequency,
fr = 10 GHz, an initial value of R of 5.82 mm, calculated from
Equation (I), was used. The optimized value of 5.95 mm was
obtained with the aid of IE3D.
The circular patches are fed with microstrip lines at the
circumferential edge, as shown in Figure 2a. For a single circular
patch, two microstrip feeding lines are used to feed the circular
patch to generate two orthogonally radiating TM t 1 modes for dualpolarized operation. Two feed points are located at the edge of the
patch, 900 away from each other, so that the coupling between
these two ports can be minimized. The port isolation also depends
on the quality factor of the patch. Increasing the substrate's thickness decreases the isolation [18]. Therefore, using thin substrates
could improve the quality of isolation.
..
.
H-port :
-.._..,---_._.._..
-,
L,5
Authorized licensd use limted to: IE Xplore. Downlade on May 13,20 at 1:4738 UTC from IE Xplore. Restricon aply.
(X-band)
H-port
(S-band )
72
H-port "
V-port .
(S-band)
noitag porP
,enizag M
3GHz
I------r----II
"'9
10 GHz
Use Eq. (1) to calculate R
Select IX1 - 1 "'9' wx1 = 0.17 mm
No
No
Yes
Yes
Normalized measured radiation patterns are shown in Figure 6. Well-defined patterns were observed. Cross-polarization levels in the E plane and H plane were 17 dB below the co-polarizedbeam peaks. It was noted that the dimensions of the ground plane
used for the array were about 18.3 em x 10.6 em, which were close
to those of the array's aperture. This could create strong edge
diffraction, and might account for the relatively higher crosspolarization levels. The peak sidelobe levels (SLL) were -10 to
-13dB, which were normal for the arrays with a uniform amplitude distribution. The asymmetric sidelobes of the H port were
caused by its feeding-line network asymmetry with respect to the
array's center. The maximum measured gain was 18.3 dBi, and the
averaged radiation efficiency was 31%. The half-power beamwidth
(HPBW) of the x-z plane was 9, and that of the y-z plane was 17.
This difference was due to the asymmetry of the 4 x 8 array
arrangement.
Figure 5 shows the return loss and the isolation of the X-band
array. The measurements were carried out with the S-band layer on
Theoretically, a microstrip antenna has a very good front-toback ratio (FBR), due to its infinite - or relatively large - ground
IE Anteas d
noitag porP
Authorized licensd use limted to: IE Xplore. Downlade on May 13,20 at 1:4738 UTC from IE Xplore. Restricon aply.
,enizag M
73
_ 'Ii:- _ - < _
-10 ...
-20
30
.
Measured S11
........Simulated S11
-><- Measured S12
(dB) -30
-10
-20
-20
-30
-40
9.5
9.6
9.7
9.8
9.9
10
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4
-20
10.5
-10
Frequency (GHz)
74
Authorized licensd use limted to: IE Xplore. Downlade on May 13,20 at 1:4738 UTC from IE Xplore. Restricon aply.
noitag porP
enizag M
Table 2. A summary of the measured and simulated results for the X-band and S-band array antennas.
Frequency (GHz)
Bandwidth (%)
Gain (dBi)
Efficiency (%)
HPBW (degrees)
Peak SLL (dB)
Polarization
Measurement
Simulation
Measurement
Simulation
Measurement
Simulation
Measurement
Simulation
E plane
Hplane
Measurement
Simulation
FBR (dB)
Isolation (dB)
X-Band
V Port
H Port
9.8-9.98
9.81-10.0
9.91-9.99
9.9-10.0
2.3
1.8
1.0
1.0
17.3
18.3
17.6
17.6
32.4
28.8
27.5
27.5
17
8.9
9.5
17.4
-12.3
-13.0
-30
> 3I.l
X to S band
-10.0
-13.0
-30
> 25.3
X to S band
-20
- - Measured 522
Measreud 521
-e-o-e-Simulated Sll
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -- -- -- - - - - - - - -
Simulated S22
CD
" -3 0
-40
-50
2.8
2.9
2.85
2.95
3
3.05
Frequency (GHz)
3.1
3.15
58
53
59
52
None
None
-34.8
>36.4
S to X band
-25.5
>33 .8
S to X band
ments for the S-band array, with or without the presence of the Xband array, including the S parameters and the radiation patterns.
When the X band was presented, the isolation of S-to-X (from the
ports of the S-band antenna to the ports of the X-band) was
between 33 dB and 42 dB; the isolation of X-to-S was better than
25 dB.
- - - - Measured 511
10
S-Band
V Port
HPort
2.94-2.96
2.94-2.96
2.94-2.96
2.94-2.96
1.03
1.03
1.03
1.03
9.5
7.9
8.72
8.73
96.8
66.8
80.9
80.9
3.2
It was observed that increasing the spacing between the Sband and the X-band antennas did not significantly improve the
isolation . Instead, it raised the center frequency of the S-band
antenna, and vice versa. Consider the case where the foam-layer
thickness (h z ) is changed within O.5 mm, If h z is increased by
-
Measured
Measured
- - Measu red
Measu red
Simulated
Simulated
-0--
E-plane co-pol
[ -plane r-pe l
H-plane co-pol
H-plan e s-pot
[ -plane co-pol
If-plane co-pol
-90
noitag porP
Authorized licensd use limted to: IE Xplore. Downlade on May 13,20 at 1:4738 UTC from IE Xplore. Restricon aply.
,ine Magz
75
- - Dual layer
- - - X-ba nd layer only
5. Acknowledgment
The authors would like to thank the Rogers Corporation for
donating the high-frequency laminates, and Mr. Ming-Yi Li of
Texas A&M University for his technical assistance and helpful
suggestions.
6. References
-90
Figure 9a. Comparisons of the X-band radiation patterns of
the If-port feed for the E plane.
- - Dual layer
- - - X-band layer only
1. A. Vallecchi and G. Gentili, "Design of Dual-Polarized SeriesFed Microstrip Arrays with Low Losses and High Polarization
Purity," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, AP-S3,
5, May 2005, pp. 1791-1798.
2. S. Gao and A. Sambell, "Dual-Polarized Broad-Band Microstrip
Antennas Fed by Proximity Coupling," IEEE Transactions on
Antennas and Propagation, AP-S3, 1, January 2005, pp. 526-530.
3. X. Qu, S. Zhong, Y. Zhang, and W. Wang, "Design of an SIX
Dual-Band Dual-Polarised Microstrip Antenna Array for SAR
Applications," lET Microwave, Antennas, and Propagation, 1, 2,
April 2007, pp. 513-517.
(d B)
-30
4. Conclusions
A dual-frequency (S-band and X-band) dual-polarization
array antenna has been developed. An ultra-thin structure was
adopted for the purpose of use with aircraft. The conformal array
can be installed on the airframe or inside the aircraft, due to its
small size and light weight. The X-band array used a series-fed
configuration to save the space of the feeding-line network. The Sband array adopted a larger radiation aperture to decrease the number of elements, to reduce the blockage, and to enhance the radiation gain. The V and H ports were put on two separate elements to
achieve high isolation. More subarrays could be assembled to
obtain higher gain with a narrower beamwidth. The newly developed dual-frequency dual-polarization array antenna should be useful for future wireless communications, remote sensing, surveillance, radar systems, and UAV applications .
76
Authorized licensd use limted to: IE Xplore. Downlade on May 13,20 at 1:4738 UTC from IE Xplore. Restricon aply.
san etnA
and
noitag porP
enizag M
Kai Chang received the BSEE degree from the National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; the MS degree from the State
University of New York at Stony Brook; and the PhD degree from
the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; in 1970, 1972, and 1976,
respectively.
Yu-Jiun Ren received the BSEE from National ChungHsing University, Taiwan; the MS degree in Communication Engineering from National Chiao-Tung University, Taiwan; and the
PhD degree from Texas A&M University at College Station; in
2000,2002, and 2007 , respectively. From 2002 to 2003, he was a
research assistant with the Radio Wave Propagation and Scattering
Laboratory, National Chiao-Tung University, and involved in
mobile-radio propagation, channel modeling, and cell planning. At
IE Anteas d
noitag porP
Authorized licensd use limted to: IE Xplore. Downlade on May 13,20 at 1:4738 UTC from IE Xplore. Restricon aply.
,enizag M
77
78
Changes of Address
or Delivery Problems
Information regarding subscriptions and addresses is managed by IEEE headquarters. It is not maintained, nor can it be
changed, by any member of the Magazine staff. If you are a member of the IEEE, your subscription is sent to the address in your
IEEE member record. Your address can be confirmed or updated
by visiting the Web page dealing with delivery of IEEE publications:
http://www.ieee.org/web/aboutus/help/products_services/
subscriptions.html
This page also has information about publication delivery, and a
link to an online form that can be used to inquire about missing or
delayed publications.
You can also update your address information by contacting
IEEE headquarters: Member Address Records, IEEE Headquarters,
445 Hoes Lane, Piscataway NJ 08855-1331 USA; Tel: +1 (908)
981-0060 or + 1 (800) 678-4333; Fax: +1 (908) 981-9667; E-mail:
address. change@ieee.org. If you are an institutional or other nonmember subscriber, contact IEEE Customer Service at the above
address,
telephone,
and
fax
numbers;
E-mail:
customer.service@ieee.org.
Please do not send requests related to the above items to any
member of the Magazine Staff.
IE Anteas d
Authorized licensd use limted to: IE Xplore. Downlade on May 13,20 at 1:4738 UTC from IE Xplore. Restricon aply.
noitag porP
.enizag M