Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
pubs.acs.org/Langmuir
INTRODUCTION
Ordered mesoporous silica can be synthesized in a variety of
pore sizes, pore shapes, pore arrangements, and morphologies.
Due to its large surface area, a material with a controllable pore
size and a narrow pore size distribution has many potential
applications, such as in separation, catalysis, and adsorption and
as templates.14 This class of materials has received much
interest in the past few decades, and depending on the application, various morphologies, pore sizes, and pore shapes are
preferable.
SBA-155,6 with its hexagonally ordered cylindrical pores can
be synthesized in a variety of morphologies, e.g., bers,7 spheres,8
platelets,9 or rods.10 The rodlike morphology of SBA-15 is of
interest due to its small dimensions, which result in short
diusion paths and thereby the possibility of fast adsorption
and mass transfer. This has been proven useful in applications
such as immobilization of enzymes1113 or as a template for
mesoporous carbon.14 The key to synthesizing rods is shortening
the stirring time from the normal 220 h to less than 10 min.
Rods with 69 nm large pores have been synthesized without
additives,10 in the presence of KCl14 or glycerol,15 or with sodium
metasilicate as the silica precursor.16 The length of these rods is
normally 12 m, but by varying the HCl concentration, the
length can be tuned from 0.3 to 4 m when glycerol is present
during the reaction.15
The pore size of SBA-15 is normally 69 nm, but it can be
increased by, e.g., adding swelling agents such as 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene (TMB)6 or by varying the hydrothermal treatment time
and temperature.17 It is possible to increase the pore size to
12 nm using swelling agents. Further increase was limited by a
phase transition from ordered hexagonal pores to disordered
mesocellular foams.18 Lately it has been shown that low-temperature syntheses with alkanes and NH4F can increase the pore
r 2011 American Chemical Society
Langmuir
ARTICLE
Table 1. Synthesis Conditions and Physisorption Data for the Synthesized Materials
sample [HCl] (mol/L) aging temp (C) aging time (h) static time (h) specic surface area (m2/g) pore size (nm) unit cell param (nm) total pore vol (cm3/g)
1.37
100
24
560
15.6
15.0
1.34
1.68
100
24
525
15.1
14.4
1.22
1.75
100
24
559
15.4
14.6
1.20
1.83
100
24
542
15.1
14.4
1.20
1.90
100
24
538
13.7
14.2
1.13
1.98
100
24
498
13.7
14.1
1.05
t6
1.75
100a
776
11.2
13.9
1.11
t24
t48
1.75
1.75
100a
100a
24
48
3
3
529
577
14.1
15.4
14.6
14.9
1.06
1.17
t120
1.75
100a
120
438
15.8
14.9
1.12
T80
1.75
80a
24
778
13.1
14.1
1.31
T130
1.75
130a
24
513
16.1
14.9
1.21
T130-t120
1.75
130a
120
410
16.8
15.4
1.12
Stat0
1.75
100
24
0 min
502
16.6
15.1b
1.35
Stat5
1.75
100
24
5 min
562
17.3
15.1
1.43
Stat10
Stat30
1.75
1.75
100
100
24
24
10 min
30 min
560
507
16.7
15.6
14.9
14.6
1.35
1.18
Stat60
1.75
100
24
60 min
545
15.0
14.6
1.17
Stat180
1.75
100
24
180 min
522
15.2
14.6
1.20
Hydrothermal treatment in an autoclave. b Calculated from the (100) diraction peak only.
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
Synthesis. Hydrochloric acid (purity g37%, puriss. p.a., Fluka, ACS
reagent, fuming), P123 (Aldrich), ammonium fluoride (purity g98.0%,
puriss. p.a., ACS reagent, Fluka), TEOS (reagent grade, 98%, Aldrich),
and heptane (99%, ReagentPlus, Sigma-Aldrich) were used as received.
In a typical synthesis 2.4 g of P123 and 0.028 g of NH4F were
dissolved in 80 mL of HCl solution. The HCl concentration in the
solution was varied between 1.37 and 1.83 M. The mixture was stirred at
20 C until the polymer was dissolved. A 17 mL volume of heptane was
premixed with 5.5 mL of TEOS and then the resulting mixture added to
the micellar solution. The synthesis was kept under vigorous stirring for
4 min and then under static conditions for 04 h. After the reaction the
solution was transferred to an autoclave for hydrothermal treatment at
100 C for 24 h. During the hydrothermal treatment study, the time and
temperature were varied between 6 and 120 h and 80 and 130 C,
respectively. The material was then ltered and washed with distilled
water and dried at 100 C overnight. Finally, the material was calcinated
at 550 C for 5 h. The samples and their synthesis conditions are
described in Table 1.
Characterization. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was
performed with a Leo 1550 Gemini scanning electron microscope
operated at 3 kV and a working distance of 35 mm. Nitrogen sorption
isotherms were obtained with a Micromeritics ASAP 2020 at 196 C
with samples outgassed at 300 C for 5 h. The pore size distribution was
calculated from the adsorption isotherm using the KrukJaroniecSayari
method24 and the BrunauerEmmettTeller (BET) surface area from the
relative pressure of 0.060.17. The total pore volume was estimated at
P0/P = 0.975. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was performed
with an FEI Tecnai G2 TF 20 UT microscope operated at 200 kV. TEM
samples were prepared by dispersing the product in acetone and
depositing it on a hollow carbon grid. X-ray diffraction (XRD) was
carried out with Cu KR radiation on a Kratky compact small-angle
Figure 1. SEM micrographs of particles synthesized with HCl concentrations of (a) 1.37 M, (b) 1.68 M, (c) 1.75 M, (d) 1.83 M, (e) 1.90 M,
and (f) 1.98 M.
system equipped with a 1024-channel detector. The air scatter was
reduced by using evacuated flight tubes.
RESULTS
Particle Shape and Separation. The particle shape varies
with the HCl concentration as can be seen in the SEM micrographs in Figure 1. In Figure 1a the particles are agglomerated
and 400 nm long and 400 nm wide. Increasing the HCl
concentration to 1.681.75 M (Figure 1b,c) results in separated
4995
Langmuir
Figure 3. Physisorption isotherms and pore size distributions calculated with the KJS method as a function of the HCl concentration in the
synthesis.
ARTICLE
Langmuir
ARTICLE
Figure 6. Pore size distributions for materials synthesized in an autoclave using dierent hydrothermal treatment conditions: (a) temperature and (b) time.
the nal pore size is reached. The pore volume is small for Stat0
but then increases as soon as the ordered pore structure is
present, Stat5 and above. The pore size and unit cell parameter
decrease with increasing static time until the nal value is reached
at Stat60. Samples synthesized with a 60 min static time are
similar to those synthesized with longer times, e.g., 180 min.
Hydrothermal Treatment. The effects of variations in the
hydrothermal treatment time and temperature on the pore size
are seen in Figure 6. All physisorption data are presented in
Table 1. It is clear that increasing the temperature and/or the
time of the hydrothermal treatment yields larger pores and a
decreased specific surface area of the materials.
DISCUSSION
Langmuir
separate the particles originates in the hydrolysis and condensation rates of TEOS and passivation of hydroxyl groups on the
particle surfaces. The hydrolysis and condensation rates of TEOS
are pH dependent, and for pH < 2 both increase with decreasing
pH (increasing HCl concentration).25 Studies of the formation
of SBA-15 have shown that spherical micelles become elongated
to cylinders upon addition of the silica precursor.26,27 These
micelles then attach together and form hexagonally ordered
clusters which then form the particles observed here. The
attachment occurs through linking of micelles by hydroxyl
groups during condensation of the silica species, and with time
these walls become more dense.27 It has previously been shown
that a low pH favors the fiber morphology while a higher pH
favors side by side anchoring of silicate micelles during the
formation. This has been explained by variations of protonation
of the silicates and electrical double-layer repulsion between
colloidal particles when the pH is altered.28,29
The particle length increases with the HCl concentration; cf.
Figure 1. This is in contradiction to what has previously been
reported by Wang et al.,15 who had glycerol present in the
synthesis, aecting the bridging between silica precursors and
thereby their hydrolysis rate. In that study it was stated that
variation in the particle length was due to a combination of high
concentrations of acid, yielding a larger number of seeds from
which particles can be formed, and the increased passivation of
the basal planes, inhibiting further elongation. In our case, the
elongation is rather related to the concentration of HCl in
combination with NH4F and thereby the hydrolysis rate of the
silica precursor. Fluoride ion, F, is a well-known catalyst for
hydrolysis and condensation of TEOS, but the concentration of
F in the solution will be aected by the HCl concentration due
to the fact that some of the H ions will form HF with a fraction
of the F ions. When F ions are in the solution, the silica
oligomers form networks that cannot penetrate deep into the
poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) shell.30 This yields less exibility
when the silicated micelles agglomerate to form the hexagonal
structure; the walls will be denser earlier and can lock the
formation from evolving further. Increasing the HCl concentration will remove some of the F catalysts, and smaller oligomers
will form the walls, making the silicated micelles more exible.
The micelles can then become elongated to form the hexagonal
structure. At the same time, a decreased pH increases the
hydrolysis and condensation rate of the silica precursor, which
increases the formation rate of the particles. As seen in studies of
the formation of SBA-15, the micelles become more elongated
and narrower with increasing time.26 This is consistent with our
observations; when the HCl concentration is increased, the
particles become more elongated and the pore size is decreased.
Hence, it is the competition between the eect of the decrease in
both the pH and F concentration that yields the variation in
morphology. For the lowest HCl concentration, sample A, the
particles are attached to each other and the pores are not as
ordered. A longer stirring time, e.g., 4 h, is needed to form an
ordered pore structure for this synthesis composition, and in this
case the ber morphology will be formed.22 In the case of
insucient stirring time, the micelles are not elongated and
can therefore not form the ordered structure. Instead the ongoing condensation quenches the material in its disordered state,
and particles are agglomerated and attached to each other with
time. Similar quenching of the structure is gained for higher HCl
concentrations as well. For sample B, there is an ordered pore
structure, but the pore lengths vary within each particle. The HCl
ARTICLE
Langmuir
The decrease in pore size with increasing HCl concentration is
probably due to two eects: increased formation rate with
increasing HCl concentration and a competition between H
and F with increasing HCl concentration. As discussed previously, the increased hydrolysis rate of the silica precursor due to
increased HCl concentrations in combination with the short
stirring time yields micelles that are more elongated and narrower. Furthermore, the balance among H, F, and HF in the
solution is shifted toward HF when the H concentration is
increased. Hence, the amount of F in the solution is reduced,
the condensation promoter eect of these ions is decreased, the
silica oligomers can penetrate deeper into the PEO shell, and the
pore size is decreased.
Hydrothermal treatment is a known method for controlling the
pore size at the angstrom level. When hexane has been used as a
swelling agent, an increase of the hydrothermal treatment time and
temperature to 130 C for 5 days increases the pore size to 18.2 nm
compared with 13.9 nm with 100 C for 1 day.35 When increasing
temperature, the hydrophilicity of the PEO chains decreases. The
chains then redraw from the silica network into the hydrophobic core
of the micelles.36 This leads to an increased pore size, decreased wall
thickness, and reduced specic surface area of the material. Hence, the
pore size can be precisely tuned between 11.2 and 16.8 nm, according
to the KJS method, by alterations in the hydrothermal treatment time
and temperature. It should be noted though that the KJS method
overestimates the pore size for pores larger than 12 nm;37 e.g., it has
previously been seen that a pore size of 19.9 nm calculated with the
KJS method is from TEM micrographs estimated to be 18 nm.21 This
is clearly also the case here, where the unit cell parameter is smaller
than the pore size for all samples; see Table 1.
CONCLUSION
We show that it is possible to synthesize separate SBA-15
particles in a low-temperature synthesis with additions of heptane and NH4F by decreasing the stirring time during the
reaction. Also, the reaction time can be decreased from 20 to 1
h without losing the quality of the material. The length and shape
of the particles can be controlled by varying the HCl concentration, and a mechanism for these variations is suggested. The pore
size can be tuned between 11.3 and 16.8 nm by changing the
hydrothermal treatment time and temperature. This work has
resulted in SBA-15 rods with the largest pore size reported for
this morphology.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Dr. Jessica Rosenholm, bo Akademi, is greatly acknowledged
for help with the XRD measurements. The Swedish Research
Council (VR) is acknowledged for nancial support.
REFERENCES
(1) Lee, J.; Cho, D.; Shim, W.; Moon, H. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2004,
21, 246251.
.; Boissiere, C. C. R. Chim. 2005, 8, 579596.
(2) Prouzet, E
(3) Chao, K.; Liu, P.; Huang, K. C. R. Chim. 2005, 8, 727739.
ARTICLE
(4) Giraldo, L. F.; Lopez, B. L.; Perez, L.; Urrego, S.; Sierra, L.; Mesa,
M. Macromol. Symp. 2007, 258, 129141.
(5) Zhao, D.; Huo, Q.; Feng, J.; Chmelka, B. F.; Stucky, G. D. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 60246036.
(6) Zhao, D.; Feng, J.; Huo, Q.; Melosh, N.; Fredrickson, G. H.;
Chmelka, B. F.; Stucky, G. D. Science 1998, 279, 548552.
(7) Schmidt-Winkel, P.; Yang, P.; Margolese, D. I.; Chmelka, B. F.;
Stucky, G. D. Adv. Mater. 1999, 11, 303307.
(8) Ma, Y.; Qi, L.; Ma, J.; Wu, Y.; Liu, O.; Cheng, H. Colloids Surf., A
2003, 229, 18.
(9) Chen, S.; Tang, C.; Chuang, W.; Lee, J.; Tsai, Y.; Chan, J. C. C.;
Lin, C.; Liu, Y.; Cheng, S. Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 39063916.
(10) Sayari, A.; Han, B.-H.; Yang, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 1434814349.
(11) Fan, J.; Lei, J.; Wang, L.; Yu, C.; Tu, B.; Zhao, D. Chem.
Commun. 2003, 21402141.
(12) Lei, J.; Fan, J.; Yu, C.; Zhang, L.; Jiang, S.; Tu, B.; Zhao, D.
Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2004, 73, 121128.
(13) Sun, J.; Zhang, H.; Tian, R.; Ding, M.; Bao, X.; Su, D. S.; Zou, H.
Chem. Commun. 2006, 13221324.
(14) Yu, C.; Fan, J.; Tian, B.; Zhao, D.; Stucky, G. D. Adv. Mater.
2002, 14, 1742.
(15) Wang, Y.; Zhang, F.; Wang, Y.; Ren, J.; Li, C.; Liu, X.; Guo, Y.;
Guo, Y.; Lu, G. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2009, 115, 649655.
(16) Kosuge, K.; Sato, T.; Kikukawa, N.; Takemori, M. Chem. Mater.
2004, 16, 899905.
(17) Fulvio, P. F.; Pikus, S.; Jaroniec, M. J. Mater. Chem. 2005,
15, 50495053.
(18) Lettow, J. S.; Han, Y. J.; Schmidt-Winkel, P.; Yang, P.; Zhao, D.;
Stucky, G. D.; Ying, J. Y. Langmuir 2000, 16, 82918295.
(19) Sun, J.; Zhang, H.; Ding, M.; Chen, Y.; Bao, X.; Klein-Homan,
A.; Pfander, N.; Su, D. S. Chem. Commun. 2005, 53435345.
(20) Zhang, H.; Sun, J.; Ma, D.; Weinberg, G.; Su, D. S.; Bao, X.
J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 2590825915.
(21) Johansson, E. M.; C
ordoba, J. M.; Oden, M. Mater. Lett. 2009,
63, 21292131.
(22) Johansson, E. M.; Cordoba, J. M.; Oden, M. Microporous
Mesoporous Mater. 2010, 133, 6674.
(23) Fulvio, P. F.; Pikus, S.; Jaroniec, M. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2005,
287, 717720.
(24) Kruk, M.; Jaroniec, M.; Sayari, A. Langmuir 1997, 13, 62676273.
(25) Cihlar, J. Colloids Surf., A 1993, 70, 239251.
(26) Ruthstein, S.; Schmidt, J.; Kesselman, E.; Telmon, Y.; Goldfarb,
D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 33663374.
(27) Khodakov, A. Y.; Zholobenko, V. L.; Imperor-Clerc, M.;
Durand, D. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 2278022790.
(28) Yang, S. M.; Yang, H.; Coombs, N.; Sokolov, I.; Kresge, C. T.;
Ozin, G. A. Adv. Mater. 1999, 11, 5255.
(29) Ozin, G. A.; Kresge, C. T.; Yang, H. In Nucleation, Growth and
Form of Mesoporous Silica: Role of Defects and a Language of Shape;
Bonneviot, L., Beland, F., Danumah, C., Giasson, S., Kaliaguine, S., Eds.;
Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis, Vol. 117; Elsevier: New York,
1998; pp 119127.
(30) Boissiere, C.; Martines, M. A. U.; Tokumoto, M.; Larbot, A.;
Prouzet, E. Chem. Mater. 2003, 15, 509515.
(31) Flodstr
om, K.; Teixeira, C. V.; Amenitsch, H.; Alfredsson, V.;
Linden, M. Langmuir 2004, 20, 48854891.
(32) Flodstr
om, K.; Wennerstrom, H.; Alfredsson, V. Langmuir
2004, 20, 680688.
(33) Colby, M. W.; Osaka, A.; Mackenzie, J. D. J. Non-Cryst. Solids
1986, 82, 3741.
(34) Boissiere, C.; van, d. L.; El Mansouri, A.; Larbot, A.; Prouzet, E.
Chem. Commun. 1999, 20472048.
(35) Kruk, M.; Cao, L. Langmuir 2007, 23, 72477254.
(36) Galarneau, A.; Cambon, H.; Di Renzo, F.; Fajula, F. Langmuir
2001, 17, 83288335.
(37) Jaroniec, M.; Solocyoc, L. A. Langmuir 2006, 22, 67576760.
4999