Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
STYLISTIC SYNTAX
1.
QUANTITATIVE
STRUCTURE
CHARACTERISTICS
OF
THE
SYNTACTIC
3.
Literature:
1. . Galperin I.R. Stylistics.
(p.p.190-253).
2.
3. .. . ., 1981.
( . 160-208)
STYLISTIC SYNTAX
Nominative sentences comprise only one principal part expressed by a noun or a noun
equivalent. The stylistic effect produced by a nominative sentence or by a succession of
nominative sentences is predetermined by a sense of the words of which they consist.
Eg. The horror! The flight! The exposure! The police! The first to desert him these
all save Sondra perhaps. And even she, too. Yes, she, of course. The horror in her eyes.
(Th.Dreiser)
Absence of auxiliary elements. (auxiliary verbs, articles, prepositions, conjunctions). All
these elements, except conjunctions, are omitted in careless colloquial speech; conjunctions, both
in colloquial speech and fiction. The absence of conjunctions bears the name asyndeton (Gr.
disconnected) Asyndetic connection between words, clauses and sentences is based upon the
lexical meanings of the parts connected. Absence of connecting elements imparts dynamic force
to the text.
B. Redundance of syntactical elements
Structural and material redundance within the simple sentence (but the same is true with
regard to the complex or compound sentences) occurs, first of all, in the increased number of
elements used.
Repetition is purely syntactical whenever what is repeated is not a word, but an abstract
syntactical position only. This is observed in any sentence comprising two or more homogeneous
parts. Compare: The people were running and Men, women, children were running. The
second sentence is not only different from the first semantically: the idea of totality of flight is
expressed in the second more emphatically.
Repetition may concern not only the syntactical positions (parts of the sentence), but the
meanings of recurrent parts as well. If the homogeneous parts are synonyms, we observe
synonymic repetition:
Joe was a mild, good-natured, sweet-tempered, easy-going, foolish dear fellow.
(Dickens)
Finally, repetition proper is recurrence of the same element (word or phrase) within one
sentence, the recurrence of words in neighboring sentences or even recurrence of whole
sentences. This kind of repetition is the most recognizable of the three; its obvious purpose is
visible intensification.
Syntactic tautology. The term implies recurrence of the noun subject in the form of the
corresponding personal pronoun. The stylistic function of this construction is communicative
emphasis of the theme.
Miss Tillie Webster, she slept forty days and nights without waking up (O.Henry)
Syntactic tautology is often met with in nursery rhymes and in folk ballads (or their
imitations):
Jack Sprats pig,
He was not very little,
He was not very big
A phenomenon, grammatically opposite to syntactic tautology, but often confused with it,
is the anticipatory use of personal pronouns:
Oh. Its a fine life, the life of the gutter (Shaw)
The stylistic function of anticipatory constructions under discussion is emphasis of the
theme (the part predicated).
Polysyndeton. The term is opposed to asyndeton means excessive use (repetition) of
conjunctions the conjunction and in most cases. Conjunctions may connect separate words,
parts of a sentence (phrases), clauses, simple and composite sentences, and even more prolonged
segments of text.
Polysyndeton is stylistically heterogeneous. Thus, in poetry and fiction, the repetition of
and either underlines the simultaneity of actions, or close connection of properties enumerated.
Advancing and prancing and glancing and dancing,
Recoiling, turmoiling, and toiling, and boiling,
And thumping, and plumping, and bumping, and jumping,
And dashing, and flashing, and splashing, and clashing;
And so never ending, and always descending
And in this way the water comes down at Lodore. (Robert Southey)
She was smartly dressed And her cheeks and lips were rouged a little. And her eyes
sparkled. And as usual she gave herself the airs of one very well content with herself.
(Dreiser)
Very often polysyndeton promotes a high-flown tonality of narrative
And only one thing really troubled him sitting there the melancholy craving in his
heart because the sun was like enchantment on his face and on the clouds and on the
golden birch leaves, and the winds rustle was so gentle, and the yew-tree green so
dark,and sickle of a moon pale in the sky. (Galsworthy)
Syntactic stylistic devices discussed above are connected with the structure of the
sentence, the number and position of its constituents. Now well search for stylistic functions in
the sentence forms. Regular interchange or repetition may not only concern communicative types
of sentences, but their syntactic structure as well. Adjacent sentences are often identical or
analogous by their syntactical (or morpho-syntactical) structures. Assimilation or even identity of
two or more neighbouring sentences (or verse lines) is called parallelism (parallel
constructions). As a matter of fact, parallelism is a variety of repetition, but not a repetition of
lexically identical sentences, only a repetition of syntactical constructions: John kept silent;
Mary was thinking. The two sentences are syntactically identical subject and predicate
consisting of two words. It should be stressed that lexically they are different.
Still, much more often it happens that parallel sentences contain the same lexical elements.
See, for instance:
adverbial modifier
Over by St Paul he stands and there is no money in it (Galsworthy)
Direct object
But Johnsie he smote, and she lay, scarcely moving in her painted iron bedstead
(O.Henry)
3. CHANGES IN THE USE OF SYNTACTIC FORMS
Revaluation of syntactical meanings.
Grammatical meanings, similar to notional meanings, can be shifted, i.e. used
figuratively. In other words, grammatical forms (in our case syntactical) are sometimes used not
in their original sphere they perform a function which is not their originally.
Quasi-affirmative sentences. This provisional term denotes a certain variety of rhetorical
question, namely those with a negative predicate. The implication of such a negative question is
an affirmative statement:
Isnt that too bad? = That is too bad.
Quasi-negative sentences. Most of them are rhetorical questions with affirmative
predicates: Did I say a word about the money? (Shaw) = I didnt say
Quasi-imperative sentences are those which express inducement (order or request) without
the imperative form of the verb. Some of them do not name the required action, but only mention
the object or a qualification of a self-evident action:
Tea. For two. Out here. (Shaw)
Quasi-interrogative sentences are either imperative or declarative. Instead of asking How
old are you? Where were you born? One may either command Fill in your age and birthplace or
explain: Here you are to write down your age and birthplace.
Types of Syntactic Connection Viewed Stylistically
Words, phrases, clauses, and sentences are connected with one another in speech. Words
and phrases are mostly combined with their environment semantically, sometimes by means of
auxiliary elements (prepositions and conjunctions) . Clauses and independent sentences can be
joined to one another asyndetically (in this case the connection is purely semantic); more often,
conjunctions or other connectors are employed.
Stylistically relevant are changes in the type of connection between the aforementioned
units.
Detachment. Detachment is specific phonetic treatment of a word or word-group ^ instead
of the usual articulation when the word (phrase) is fused with its environment, the speaker makes
a short pause before (and often after) the detached segment and lays special stress on it. As a
result of this, the word (phrase) appears to be opposed to the rest of the sentence to what
precedes it and follows it. Hence, the detached part is underlined as something specially
important.
In writing and in print, detached parts are separated from the rest of the sentence by
punctuation marks (mostly by commas or dashes). Unusual placement in the sentence (inversion
see above) is also a sure sign of detachment.
The general stylistic effect of detachment is strengthening, emphasizing the word (or
phrase) in question. Besides, detachment imparts additional syntactical meanings to the word or
phrase.
Talent, Mr. Micawber has, capital, Mr. Micawber has not. (Dickens)