Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
The Alignment for the RGV is not final yet – the Wall will count – I don’t think there is a problem with
OPB or the Sector I just need to understand the process – Also CBP is in-charge of Real Estate not
the USACE - USACE is executing the Real Estate actions - – I will come see you tomorrow – thanks
loren
I will check with(b) (6) to see exactly what he means because the last I knew the only movement was
because the sector had not seen an engineering floodplain assessment to ensure the latest laydown. I know I never
saw the "final" laydown as far as north/south nor have I seen or heard an anwer to (b) question of whether we
can count the retaining wall as fencing. I didn't know there was ever a question if (6)
the Corps was in charge of real
estate or not. USACE is in charge. I believe that (b) wants to ensure that all of his work is not "for naught" so
he wants to foster all the help he can towards the (6)
process. The sector chiefs are on the hook for what happens in
this project and have delegated that responsibility to agents such as (b) (6) I can ensure you that all are working
for the greater good.
(b)
(6)
----- Original Message -----
From: FLOSSMAN, LOREN W (b) (6) >
To: (b) (6)
-----Original Message-----
From (b) (6)
(b) (6) l]
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 5:22 PM
To: (b) (6)
By way of update on the real estate for Del Rio,TX, all landowners have
signed ROE for S&E but one. The one who hasn't may not be touched by
the
final fence alignment. As a result, we no longer have an immediate need
for
condemnation in Del Rio. In order to proceed to get to negotiations
with the
owners for the permanent construction rights we need, there are some
questions we need resolved as quickly as possible in the interests of
schedule.
2. Will DHS/CBP provide gate access to each of the private owners along
the
Del Rio fence segment? This area is primarily rural in use, although
near
the City of Del Rio. If we are able to acquire only the swath of land
required for the physical fence and not all of the land from the fence
south
to the Rio Grande River, then we will have lower acquisition costs by
virtue
of not needing to value the loss of riparian rights. The government
estimates of value can be completed in a quicker time period as well.
This
has to be weighed against the risks and concerns associated with private
gate
access. Purely from real estate standpoint, we would recommend the gates
because of the lower acquisition cost and more likelihood a landowner
would
voluntarily convey what we need. However, the security concerns are the
major driver of the decision. We can certainly acquire to the river if
the
project requires it.
(b)
(6)
-----Original Message-----
From: (b) (6)
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 1:15 PM
To: (b) (6)
Cc: (b) (6)
(b) (6) - as requested (b) (6) has stated that he wants to be the
POC for
the appraisers
-----Original Message-----
From (b) (6) v]
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 8:37 AM
To: (b) (6) WF
Cc: (b) (6)
Subject: Realty Information
(b) (6)
Thanks
(b) (6)
Del Rio Sector
(b) (6)