Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Copyright © 2000 by The Center for Strategic and International Studies and the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
The Washington Quarterly • 23:2 pp. 235–238.
voters conducted by John Zogby and his firm, Zogby International, between
December 11, 1998, and November 18, 1999, gives a bird’s eye view of the
challenges facing Clinton. The extraordinarily large sample gives the oppor-
tunity to examine and analyze demographic, geographic, and political sub-
groups much more closely than normally possible. Overall, Giuliani leads by
six percentage points, 48 to 42 percent, with 11 percent undecided.
First, look at Jewish voters, who make up 12 percent of the vote. Nor-
mally, Democrats can count on winning 70-75 percent of the Jewish vote in
New York, but among the 932 Jews in the
Zogby surveys, Clinton only tied Giuliani, 44
Clinton faces a to 44 percent. It is true that D’Amato and, for
that matter, Giuliani have always done better
distinctly uphill fight
among Jewish voters than other Republicans,
to win her first but this is clearly a problem for Clinton.
elective office. Exacerbating the situation for Clinton is
that Giuliani also beats her by 19 points
among Catholics, 55 to 36 percent. Catholics
make up 43 percent of the state’s electorate,
and white ethnic Catholics are a huge problem for her because they nor-
mally vote with the Democratic candidate.
Next, look at voters in union households, who make up almost a third of
the electorate. In his 55-44 percent win last year, exit polls showed Schumer
carried union households by 21 points, 60 to 39 percent. Clinton prevails by
only four percentage points, 47 to 43 percent. Given the disproportionate
number of Catholics and other white ethnics in the union vote, and
Clinton’s low ratings in those groups, her low union margin is understand-
able but still a problem.
Now, look at partisanship. Giuliani does much better among Republicans
than Clinton does among Democrats. He beats her soundly among indepen-
dents. Within the 35 percent of the New York electorate who call them-
selves Republicans, Giuliani captures 75 percent of the vote. By contrast,
Clinton carries the 45 percent who are Democrats with only 65 percent of
the vote. The greater number of Democrats would still give Clinton the
edge, except that Giuliani also carries the fifth of voters who are indepen-
dent or belong to other parties by 17 points, 51 to 34 percent.
The estimated percent of the vote that a Republican needs to win in New
York City, an area whose vote translates to between 29 and 31 percent of
the overall electorate, varies from 30 to 36 percent, depending upon how
that Republican draws upstate and in the suburbs. In a typical race, a 64 to
36 percent win by a Democratic candidate in the city would translate into a
50-50 race statewide. With Giuliani pulling 33 percent in these surveys and
Clinton getting 59 percent, with nine percent undecided, he stands now at
the cusp of what he needs to win, all other areas behaving normally.
In the New York City suburbs, which constitute 29 percent of the vote,
Giuliani dominates Clinton, 59 to 32 percent. If Giuliani gets anywhere near
this vote in November, the First Lady has little chance of victory. In the up-
state region, Giuliani seems to be underperforming, winning only 50 percent
of the vote to 38 percent for Clinton. This could be a function of a prejudice
against a New York City mayor by upstate voters. Generally, a Republican
needs to pull at least 56 to 57 percent of the upstate vote to win statewide.
Simply put, Clinton has two problems. With
the exception of African American voters, she
does not perform nearly as well among the core
Giuliani does much Democratic Party constituencies as she needs
better among to in order to win. Second, among swing con-
Republicans than stituencies (independents, moderates, and sub-
urbanites) that she needs to get to move from
Clinton does among the party base of 42-45 percent to 50 percent,
Democrats. she is woefully underperforming.
According to Zogby, Clinton must do four
things to win. She has to reduce Giuliani’s
margins in the suburbs; Zogby suggested that
she should be able to score some points on education, health care, and other
family issues. Second, she must win the upstate cities. Third, she needs to
drive African American turnout above normal levels, just as Democrats
have in many key races in 1998 and in the Mississippi gubernatorial race in
1999. Finally, she has to hope that Giuliani makes a mistake.
In short, Clinton lost a lot of ground during 1999. The good news for
Clinton and Democrats is that as badly as she is doing among core Demo-
cratic groups, she still only trails Giuliani by single digits. It does not take
much movement among these groups, who almost always vote Democratic,
to put her back in the hunt. Persuading people who normally vote Republi-
can to vote Democratic is hard. Persuading those who usually split their
tickets is also a challenge, just not as great. Persuading those who normally
vote Democratic to return to the fold is not one of the greatest challenges in
politics.
Does Giuliani have an edge in this race? Absolutely. Has he already won
it? No.