Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Bioinformatics
22
Evolutionary computing
23
Cryptography
24
SCADA Systems
Web Security
25
Digital Control
26
27
Computer Graphics
28
Computer Animation
29
Pattern Recognition
30
Genetic Algorithms
31
11
32
33
13 Image Analysis
34
Intelligent Systems
14 Artificial Intelligence
35
15 Neural Networks
36
Mobile Communications
37
Embedded Systems
38
Advanced Architectures
39
19 e-Commerce
40
Economic Engineering
20 Computational Geometry
41
IT Financial Engineering
21 Systems Simulation
42
IT Governance
Data Mining
3.
2.
4.
2.
5.
3.
6.
2.
3.
Sales Management
4.
Marketing Plan
APPLIED SCIENCE AND ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH CENTER, (CICATA) CAMPUS QUERETARO
(ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES MASTER PROGRAM
1.
Applied Physics
5.
Computer Vision
2.
Pattern Recognition
6.
Thermodynamics
3.
Advanced Technologies
7.
Radioprotection
4.
8.
Consumer behavior
LEVEL: II
GENERAL PURPOSE
Explain consumer behavior in the field of marketers, on the development of behaviors, interests and attitudes that
people take in the process of consumption of goods and services, which are the foundation on how marketing is
based, considering the ethical and social responsibility, through collaborative research of documentary and field.
CONTENTS:
I. Introduction to consumer behavior.
II. The socio-cultural consumer behavior.
III. Psychological factors in consumer behavior.
IV. The consumer and marketing
EDUCATIONAL GUIDANCE:
The teaching-learning allows students to construct their own learning, through the following strategies:
documentary and field research, text analysis, solving case studies, making presentations and exhibitions of
individual and groups.
ASSESSMENT AND ACCREDITATION
Include a written diagnostic evaluation to determine prior knowledge related to the learning unit. Formative
evaluation will be conducted consisting of the delivery of learning strategies and application of tests in each unit,
forming a portfolio of evidence. The assessment is weighted in the delivery of desk research and the realization
of the four practices in the field.
This learning unit can be evidenced by demonstrated competence using the weighted evaluation criteria
mentioned above.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Arellano, Rolando, Comportamiento del consumidor, Enfoque Amrica Latina, McGraw-Hill, Mxico 2002, 563 pgs.,
ISBN: 970-10-3527-5
D. Blackwell, Roger, W. Miniard, Paul y F. Engel James, Comportamiento del Consumidor, Thomson Editores, Mxico
2002, 9 edicin, 592 pgs., ISBN 970-686-187-4
Kotler, Philip y L. Keller Kevin, Direccin de Marketing, Prentice Hall, Mxico 2006, 12 edicin, 776 pgs.,
ISBN 978-970-26-0763-2
R. Solomon, Michael, Comportamiento del Consumidor, Pearson, Mxico 2008, 7 edicin, 672 pgs.,
ISBN 978-970-26-1086-1
Schiffman, Len y Kanuk, L. Lazar, Comportamiento del consumidor, Pearson Educacin Mxico 2005, 8 edicin,
587 pgs., ISBN: 970-26-0596-2
CONSULTATION OF WEB PAGES
http://www.profeco.org.mx Retrieved on June 21, 2008, http://www.alconsumidor.org Retrieved on June 21, 2008,
http://www.elpoderdelconsumidor.org Retrieved on June 22, 2008, http://www. amai.org/niveles.php Retrieved on June
22, 2008, http://www.conapo.gob.mx Retrieved on June 27, 2008, http://www.delariva.com.mx Retrieved on June 27,
2008, http://www.redpuentes.org Retrieved on July 6, 2008, http://www.comerciojusto.com.mx Retrieved on July 6,
2008, http://www.vinculando.org Retrieved on July 6, 2008, http://www.storyofstuff.com Retrieved on August 10, 2008.
http://www.apestan.com.mx Retrieved on December 11, 2008
GENERAL PURPOSE
This learning unit is essential for the professional development of graduate in Business Relationships, as its practice is strongly
related to meeting the needs and desires of consumers. Hence, it is necessary that the trade relations professional in understanding
the importance of the consumption process, investigate the various behaviors and communicate to businesses the importance and
advantages to be gained to develop new products and services based on the consumer.
Competencies to be achieved in this learning unit will be:
Investigate the reasons why consumers buy, use or reject a particular product or service.
Differentiate the major theories and approaches to study consumer behavior
Analyze the process of consumption,
Reflect on the importance of sustainability and consumer
Understand consumer rights.
Integrate key psychological factors that affect consumer behavior.
Distinguish the various socioeconomic and cultural variables related to consumption.
Analyze their influence on consumer behavior.
Analyze the relationship of the consumer with the basic elements of marketing,
Assess the importance of meeting or exceeding customer expectations.
Work collaboratively to reach agreement.
Present the results of investigations against the group.
understand texts related to the thematic units in the English language.
This learning unit is connected horizontally with:
o
Introduction to integrated communication.
o
Introduction to the sale.
And up and down vertically with: Fundamentals of Marketing, Analytical or Marketing, Direct marketing, Purchasing,
Advertising and Media, Quantitative and Qualitative Market research, Public Relations, Macroeconomics, Sales Promotion ,
Media, Global economic trends, Strategic planning and integrated communication, Business development workshop and
Commercial or strategic direction.
GENERAL PURPOSE
Explain consumer behavior in the field of marketers, on the development of behaviors, interests and attitudes that people
take in the process of consumption of goods and services, which are the foundation on how marketing is based, considering
the ethical and social responsibility, through collaborative research of documentary and field.
ASSIGNED TIMES
HOURS THEORY/WEEK: 3.0
HOURS PRACTICE/WEEK: 3.0
HOURS THEORY/SEMESTER:
54.0
HOURS PRACTICE/SEMESTER:
54.0
HOURS
TOTALS/SEMESTER:108.0
LEARNING UNIT:
PAGE:
Consumer behavior
OF
N THEME UNIT: I
No.
1.1
1.1.1
1.1.2
1.1.3
CONTENTS
1.1.3.1
1.1.3.2
1.1.3.3
1.1.3.4
1.1.3.5
Consumer behavior.
Conceptualization.
Its importance in the study added marketing.
Characteristics of consumer participation in the consumption
process.
The consumer.
buyer
Customer.
Influencer.
Decision-maker.
1.2
1.2.1
1.2.2
1.2.3
1.3
1.3.1.
1.3.2
1.3.3
1.3.4
1.3.5
1.3.6
1.4
1.4.1
1.5
1.5.1
1.5.2
1.5.3
1.5.4
1.6
HOURS AD
KEY
LITERATURE
T
P
2.0
1.0
T
2.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
2.0
2.0 2.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
2.0
2.0
8.0
6.0 5.0
7.0
TAA
KEY
LITERATURE
P
9-B
15-B
18-B
Consumer behavior
PAGE:
OF
LEARNING STRATEGIES
Discussion on collaborative teams of the concept and importance of consumer behavior.
Development of concept maps as a team on the characteristics of consumer participation in the consumption process.
Assess a case study stage of the process of consumer behavior provided.
Preparation and presentation of the team presenting the case to the group.
Electronic Research staff work on federal legislation and consumer standards institutions in Mexico.
Conduct practice no. 1: "The process of consumption."
Reading and comprehension of English texts related to the thematic unity with individual and team proficiency.
ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING:
Review written diagnosis to determine students' prior knowledge related to the learning unit.
Delivery of written conclusions on the result of team discussion, the evidence
be to deliver a manuscript and briefly (2-3 pages) that contains the general opinion of each ...5%
Delivery of a conceptual map at least 80% of the items included in the subject ......5%
Submission of written report of the documentary research on the following criteria: Quality of presentation (cover, index,
thematic development, conclusion) with an extensive text of four to six pages, all content areas of the unit and
bibliographic references . and electronic journals section ... .. .10%
Exhibition and presentation of the case investigated considering the quality of the written and exhibitions such as: verbal
fluency, attractive and material support creative compliance time ... ... .... ... .. 10%
Report writing practice no. 1. Develop and implement five-depth interviews (semistructured) per team, with housewives
made by each student to integrate a collaborative team, which will be integrated into one report per team, considering as
evidence: interviews objective, methodology , results and conclusions. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 20%
Review .....30%
Written evaluation of the English vocabulary ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. ......................... ....... 20%
PAGE:
Consumer behavior
OF
N THEME UNIT: II
No.
HOURS AD
KEY
LITERATURE
T
P
CONTENTS
TAA
T
2.1
2.1.1
2.1.2
Cultural Factors
Cultural influences on consumer behavior.
Creation and dissemination of global culture of consumption.
1.0
1.0
2.0
2.2
2.2.1
2.2.2.
Subcultural factors.
Subcultures ethnic, racial and religious.
Generations of "Baby Boomers", "X and Y"
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.3
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
2.3.4
Social factors.
Influence of groups
Reference Groups
Opinion leadership.
Family.
2.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.4
2.4.1
socioeconomic
AMAI socioeconomic
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.5
2.0
6.0
TEACHING
ACTIVITIES
9-B
15-B
18-B
2.0
5.0
4.0
LEARNING STRATEGIES
Delivery of a report as a result of the discussion taking as evidence a brief manuscript (2-3 pages) in which they
express the general opinion of each team. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ..... .... 5%
Delivery of a conceptual map that contains at least 80% of the items included in the subject ......................... 5%
Delivery of the report of the Investigation of Reference Groups on the following criteria: Quality of presentation
(cover, index, thematic development, conclusion), text length determined by number of pages, all contained
within the subject referral and bibliographic references. hemerographic and ..10%
Providing research report socioeconomic levels under the following criteria: Quality of presentation (cover,
index, thematic development, conclusion), text length determined by number of pages, all contained within the theme
related and References is acknowledged. hemerographic and ....10%
Report writing practice no. 2. Survey of a sample of 20 households per team, housewives, considering as
evidence: Objective of the survey methodology, results and ......................... ...... 20%
Review .....30%
Written evaluation of the English vocabulary ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...... 20%
PAGE:
Consumer behavior
OF
Explain the major psychological factors that affect consumer behavior and the process involved in designing
marketing strategies, through design, implementation and analysis of an observation guide.
No.
CONTENTS
HOURS AD
KEY
LITERATURE
T
P
1.0
1.0
TAA
T
1.0
P
1.0
3.1.
3.1.1
3.1.2
3.1.3
Personality.
Theories of personality.
Understanding the diversity of the consumer.
Brand personality
3.2
3.2.1
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.2.4
2.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
3.3.
3.3.1
3.3.2
3.3.3
Perception
Sensory systems.
Perceptual stimuli
Perceptual process: selection, organization and interpretation
2.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
3.4
3.4.1
3.4.2
3.4.3
3.4.4
2.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
3.5
3.5.1
3.5.2
3.5.3
3.5.5
3.5.5
Attitudes
Elements of the attitudes.
Model attitudes.
Functions of attitudes
Changing attitudes.
Study of the attitudes.
3.0
1.0
2.0
2.0
10.0
2.0
6.0
6.0
TEACHING
ACTIVITIES
9-B
15-B
18-B
LEARNING STRATEGIES
For each content area covered by this unit, perform the following learning strategies:
Presentation of research report on the following criteria: Quality of presentation (cover, index, thematic
development, conclusion), text length determined by number of pages, the entire content included in the issue
referred and references. and electronic journals section ................................................................................ ... 10%
Presentation exhibition of collaborative work in teams, considering: verbal fluency, attractive and material
support creative compliance time ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. ... 10%
Discussion and analysis of thematic content in computer and plenary sessions, taking as evidence the delivery
of a brief manuscript (2-3 pages) in which they express the general opinion of each team ... ... 10%
Report writing practice no. 3. Register observer in ten guides per team, with the data related to the behavior of
housewives in a convenience store, considered as evidence: Objective of the survey methodology, results and
conclusions. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ......................................................................................................... .... ...... 20%
Review .30%
Written evaluation of the English vocabulary ... ... ... .................................................................................... 20%
LEARNING UNIT:
N THEME UNIT: IV
PAGE: 10
OF
Consumer behavior
8
NAME: The consumer and marketing.
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES
Analyze the relationship consumers have with the basic elements of marketing, to assess the importance of meeting or
exceeding customer expectations through a survey on the identification of the demographic characteristics of a target
market.
No.
HOURS AD
KEY
LITERATURE
T
P
CONTENTS
4.1.
4.1.1.
4.1.2.
1.0
4.2.
4.2.1.
4.2.2.
4.2.3.
4.2.4.
4.2.5.
Segmentation of consumers
Geographic
Demographic
Psychographics
Benefits
Behavioral
4.3.
4.3.1.
4.3.2.
4.3.3.
4.3.4.
4.3.5.
4.3.6.
4.3.7.
4.3.8.
4.3.9.
4.4.
4.4.1.
4.4.2.
4.4.3.
4.4.4.
4.4.5.
4.5.
4.5.1.
4.5.2.
4.5.3.
4.5.4.
4.5.5.
TAA
T
P
9-B
15-B
18-B
1.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
Subtotals Thematic Unit 9.0
9.0
2.0
6.0
TEACHING
ACTIVITIES
6.0
.
ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING
Presentation of research report on the following criteria: Quality of presentation (cover, index, thematic
development, conclusion), text length determined by number of pages, the entire content included in the issue
referred and references. and electronic journals section ... ... 10%
Presentation exhibition of collaborative work in teams, considering: verbal fluency, attractive and material
support creative compliance time ... ... ... ... . ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 10 %
Discussion and analysis of thematic content in computer and plenary sessions, taking as evidence the delivery
of a brief manuscript (2-3 pages) in which they express the general opinion of each ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 10 %
Report writing practice no. 4. Develop and implement twenty surveys on demographic characteristics of a target
market, considering as evidence: objective, methodology, results and conclusions. Be given a report by staff. ...
... ... ... ... .... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. 20%
Review ..30%
Written evaluation of the English vocabulary ... . ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ......................... ... 20%
PAGE:
Consumer behavior
12
OF
LIST OF PRACTICES
Practice
No.
NAME OF PRACTICE
THEMATIC
UNITS
DURATION
DURATION
PLACE
13.0
Field
II
10.0
Field
Consumer attitudes.
III
16.0
Field
IV
15.0
Field
TOTAL HOURS
54 hrs.
LEARNING UNIT:
Consumer Behavior
ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE
Thematic Unit I Introduction to consumer behavior
The socio-cultural thematic unit II of consumer behavior
Thematic Unit III Psychological factors in consumer behavior
Thematic Unit IV The consumer and marketing
PAGE:
13
OF:
25%
15 %
30%
30%
Demonstrated competence at the beginning of the course and request (a) through a written evaluation and
implementation of the four practices considered in the learning unit which together show that having at least 80%
of the mastery of core competencies Learning Unit.
Courses in other national higher education institutions that have an agreement with the IPN.
Mobility between St. Thomas and ESCA Tepepan unit according to their ability to care.
KEY
REFERENCES
Anderson, W. Jasso, Consumption asset to seize power, Consumers Digest, Mexico, in December. 2007,
no.: 370, p. 12-15. ISSN: 0185-8874
Rachel Brown, Mary E. Perez, Claudia Quintanilla, Shopping at the border, Expansion, Mexico, May 26,
2008 no.: 991, p. 66-68. ISSN: 0185-2728
Marshal Cohen, Consumer behavior, who they are, why they buy and how to anticipate each of its
movements, McGraw-Hill, Mexico, 2006, ISBN: 10-970-10-5894-1
Crusade against misleading advertising, Expansion, Mexico, June 23, 2008 no.: 993, 350 pg. ISSN:
0185-2728
John Derick, Emotions, impulses and reasons, Expansion, Mexico, May 26, 2008 no.: 991, p. 85-86.
ISSN: 0185-2728
They buy and they go shopping, Expansion, Mexico, May 26, 2008 no.: 991, p. 46-50. ISSN: 0185-2728
Fernandez de Lara Carlos, Arrogant Technology, Excelsior, Mexico, June 20, 2008.
Naomi Klein, No Logo, The power of brands, Oxford Paids Ibrica, Spain, 2005 ISBN: 84-493-1248-5
7
8
Philip Kotler and Kevin Keller L, Marketing Management, 12th edition, Pearson Education, Mexico, 2006
ISBN: 970-26-0763-9
10
The consumer union is strength, Expansion, Mexico, June 23, 2008 no.: 993, p. 348. ISSN: 0185-2728
11
Luis de Llano Macedo, Generation 'Y' and 'T phenomenon', Expansion, Mexico, June 23, 2008 no.: 993,
pp. 363-367. ISSN: 0185-2728
12
Alejandro Mejia C., Consumer Crusade, Expansion, Mexico, June 23, 2008 no.: 993, pp. 345-46. ISSN:
0185-2728
13
Adrian Ryans, The customer has no reason, Expansion, Mexico, May 26, 2008 no.: 991, p. 58-60. ISSN:
0185-2728
14
Michael Saren, Marketing at Grupo Editorial Patria graffiti, Mexico, 2007 ISBN: 978-970-817067-3
15
Schiffman Leon and kanuka L. Lazar, Consumer Behavior 8th edition, Pearson Education, Mexico, 2005
ISBN: 970-26-0596-2
16
If it's expensive, it sure is good, Expansion, Mexico, May 26, 2008 no.: 991, p. 52-54. ISSN: 0185-2728
17
Claudia Solera, The world is me, leave behind the X, Excelsior, Mexico, April 13, 2008.
18
19
Michael R. Solomon, Consumer Behavior 7th edition, Pearson Education Mexico, 2008 ISBN: 978-97026-1086-1
X
William Stanton, Etzel and Michael Bruce Walker, Fundamentals of Marketing, 14th Edition, McGraw-Hill,
Mexico, 2007, ISBN: 970-10-6201-9
Websites internet:
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
ACADEMIC PROGRAM:
FORMATIVE
AREA:
ACADEMY:
Institutional
Marketing
Scientfic Basic
Professional
LEARNING UNIT:
II
LEVEL:
Consumer Behavior
OBJECTIVE LEARNING UNIT: Explain consumer behavior in the field marketing muscle on the development of
behaviors, interests and attitudes that people take in the process of consumption of goods and services,
considering the ethics and social responsibility through collaborative research of documentary and field
TEACHER PROFILE
KNOWLEDGE
Marketing.
Consumer psychology.
SKILLS PROFESSIONAL
In the areas of:
Marketing, sales,
Communication, service and
Market research
Sociology.
Economy of consumption.
Educational model of IPN
PREPARED BY
HABILITIES
Negotiation
Fluency.
Proper communication
oral and written.
Applying the
institutional educational
To motivate staff.
Leadership.
Management groups.
Troubleshooting.
Application of MEI.
REVISED
ATTITUDE
Flexible.
Empathy..
Tolerance.
Respect.
Service.
AUTORIZED
DATE: 2009.
ACADEMIC PROGRAM:
LEARNING UNIT:
LEVEL:
II
LEVEL: II.
METHOD: Schooling and no schooling
SCHOOL YEAR: Fourth.
CREDITS: 6 SATCA (9 Tepic)
EDUCATION INTENTION
This learning unit contributes to the exit profile of Business Administration and Business Development in the
acquisition of skills which analyze geopolitical integration phases of the countries and the Mexican economy
in the global context. Due to the global interconnection, companies operating in national markets are affected
by an economy increasingly integrated. Not only the face of growing competition from foreign companies, but
also by the dependence of the flow of raw materials, intermediate goods, and funding from foreign sources.
These skills enable students to develop the ability to integrate effectively in teams and responsibly addressed,
disposition, tolerance, fairness, leadership and creativity, as well as directed toward the achievement of goals,
objectives and results, updated, permanently learn and adapt to change, allowing Mexico's integration into the
global economy.
Mexican Economy in the Global Context has been preceded by a learning units: Foundations of Accounting,
Law, Marketing Basics and Fundamentals of Economics, as subsequent to the learning unit for Standardization
Standards as parallel learning units: Law commercial, Sales Management and Study of Economic Blocs. Also
relates transversely with learning units: Oral and written communication, Troubleshooting and creativity,
Sustainable Development, Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics, Entrepreneurship and Social
Service.
PURPOSE OF LEARNING UNIT
To analyze the characteristics of the Mexican economy from the global economic context.
TIMES ASSIGNED
LEARNING UNIT
AUTHORIZED BY:
DESIGNED BY: Academy of
Committee on Academic
THEORY HOURS / WEEK: 3.0
Economics ESCA Santo Tomas
Programs Advisory Council
Unit.
General IPN.
PRACTICE HOURS / WEEK: 3.0
REVIEWED BY: Unit
Academic Branch St. Tomas
HOURS THEORY / SEMESTER: 54.0
APPROVED BY: Technical
Advisory Unit School St. Tomas.
Dr. Emmanuel Alejandro
PRACTICE HOURS / SEMESTER: 54.0
President, CPA Norma Cano
Merchan Cruz
TOTAL HOURS / SEMESTER: 108
Olea
Technical Secretary for
Academic Programs
Committee
LEARNING UNIT:
THEMATIC UNIT No.:
PAGE:
OF
15
UNIT OF COMPETENCE
Difference stages of the globalization process and the formation of integrated markets based on the economic
performance of military movements (first and second world war).
HOURS AD
HOURS AD
KEY
Teaching
No.
CONTENTS
Teaching
LITERATU
activities
activities
RE
T
P
1.1
The economy in the global context.
1.0
1.0
1.0
1C
1.1.1
Concept, background and objectives of globalization.
9B
Major International Organizations
3B
1.1.2
(IMF, World Bank, GATT-WTO, FAO, ILO, OECD).
1.2
1.2.1
1.2.2
1.2.3
1.2.4
1.3
1.3.1
Economic policy.
The Trade Policy.
Trade policy instruments.
Model protectionist.
Free market model.
Global economic Radiography.
Economic crises in the XXI century.
Emerging economies.
subtotals:
2.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
4.0
4.0
3.0
LEARNING STRATEGIES
Questions detonating on the themes: globalization, international organizations, trade policy, economic crisis and
emerging economies. On computers and the information we have, develop worksheets.
Search for information from various sources on concepts, background and objectives of globalization to develop
concept maps.
Discussion guided by the teacher based on research.
Team Interactive exhibition on international organizations.
Based on the presentations and teacher monitoring, develop a table of international agencies including: core
members, objectives, and functions, supervisory and regulatory policies.
Professor interactive exhibition about trade policy and its main instruments.
Based on monitoring exposure and teacher, prepare a comparison chart that highlights the most important
features of a model free market protectionist.
Interactive exhibition by the teacher about the economic and financial crises of the century.
Based on monitoring exposure and teacher, develop an analysis of the crisis in the world, including the factors
that influence economic fluctuations that have characterized financial and economic crises of the century and the
rise of emerging economies.
Written objective test (examination).
Integration of the portfolio of evidence.
PAGE:
OF
EVALUATION OF LEARNING
Portfolio of evidence:
Worksheets
Concept map
Interactive exhibit
Table (international)
Comparative Table
Analysis
Objective test
10%
10%
20%
10%
10%
10%
30%
15
II
PAGE:
OF
15
UNIT OF COMPETENCE
Identify each of the degrees of economic integration from the trade agreement signed by member countries.
No.
2.1
2.1.1
2.2
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.2.4
2.3
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
2.4
2.4.1
2.4.2
2.4.3
2.4.4
2.4.5
2.4.6
HOURS AD
Teaching
activities
T
P
1.0
1.0
CONTENTS
Economic integration process
Concept, background and objectives
Degrees of Economic Integration.
Free trade zone.
Customs Union
Common Market.
Economic Union and Economic Integration
altogether.
Economic Zones
Europe
America
Asia and Oceania
Major economic integrations.
Economic integration in Africa.
EUROPEAN UNION.
NAFTA
MERCOSUR.
LAIA.
ASEAN.
subtotals:
TAA HOURS
Independent
Learning
Activities
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
3.0
2.0
2.0
5.0
6.0
5.0
11.0
KEY
LITERAT
URE
9B
4C
2B
LEARNING STRATEGIES
Discussion guided by the teacher about the concepts and objectives antecedes economic integration
process for the recovery of prior knowledge.
Prior information search and discussion guided by the teacher about the degree of economic
integration and the definition of economic zones that make up the world's geopolitics.
With constant monitoring, develop a timeline dual input (horizontal line bounded vertically years and
significant events), that includes at least the key elements and features of the historical context for
each economic integration.
With constant monitoring, develop an overview of treaties including the advantages and disadvantages
depending on the sector, and the main products exported in Mexico.
With constant monitoring, develop a statistical investigation to identify agricultural commodities
higher monetary value and export volume.
With constant monitoring, develop an analysis of government support for agricultural exporting
SMEs.
Case Study 1: "The process of Globalization". Team and based in a case brought by the teacher,
identify the stages of the process of globalization from two periods: 1) 1870-1914 comprising driven
by falling transport costs and the First World War and 2) the second stage of globalization of 19451970 with the closing of the Second World War, the Cold War, the creation of multilateral institutions
and the formation of integrated markets. Will undertake the following activities:
a. Presentation of resources, evaluation methods, and objectives of the case.
Exposure to study case.
i. Talk in teams to determine the tentative work plan and development of the case.
LEARNING UNIT:
PAGE:
OF
15
ii. Study and analysis of the case by a team approach to problem situations (questions
arising from the same case).
iii. With guidance and constant feedback from the teacher continually adjusts the final
report and conclusions are developed.
iv. Exposure of the solution and case team's conclusions.
v. Conclusions and teacher feedback on team practices.
b. Written objective test (based on the case).
c. Integration of the portfolio of evidence.
EVALUATION OF LEARNING
Portfolio of evidence:
Interactive exhibit
Synthesis
Case Study 2
Objective test
20%
10%
40%
30%
LEARNING UNIT:
THEMATIC UNIT No.:
PAGE:
OF
15
UNIT OF COMPETENCE
To distinguish the current economic integration scenarios based on the characteristics of the geopolitical.
No.
3.1
3.1.1
3.1.2
CONTENTS
HOURS AD
Teaching
activities
T
P
2.0
1.0
TAA HOURS
Independent
Learning
Activities
2.0
KEY
LITERATU
RE
3B
9B
2B
Concept.
3.2
3.2.1
3.2.2
Background.
1.0
1.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
6.0
7.0
4.0
12.0
3.3
3.3.1
3.3.2
Modes of production.
3.4
3.4.1
LEARNING STRATEGIES
Guided Discussion on geopolitics, capitalism and the Pacific Rim for brainstorming.
Pre-reading proposals (anthology) by the teacher about geopolitics, capitalism, causes the new world order and
APEC to form 2 teams per item.
a. Interactive exhibition team based on a rubric prior reading pre-prepared by the teacher.
b. equipment and after each exposure, to provide an overview of each topic.
Case Study 2 "geopolitical and economic evolution of integrated markets." In team and based on a case brought
by the teacher, review the process of evolution of the geopolitical and integrated markets, according to the
background of the political division (training world) and the modes of production. Will undertake the following
activities:
c. a) Presentation of resources, evaluation methods, and objectives of the case.
d. b) Presentation of the case study.
e. c) Discussion on computers to determine the tentative work plan and development of the case.
f. d) Study and analysis of the case by a team approach to problem situations (questions arising from the
same case).
g. e) With guidance and constant feedback from the teacher continually adjusts the final report and
conclusions are developed.
h. f) Exposure of the solution and case team's conclusions.
i. g) Conclusions and teacher feedback on team practices.
Written objective test (based on the case).
Integration of the portfolio of evidence.
PAGE:
OF
15
EVALUATION OF LEARNING
Portfolio of evidence:
Interactive exhibit
Synthesis
Case Study 2
Objective test
20%
10%
40%
30%
LEARNING UNIT:
THEMATIC UNIT No.:
PAGE:
10
OF
15
UNIT OF COMPETENCE
Interprets the scenes of the international economic structure from its components and economic indicators.
No.
HOURS AD
Teaching
activities
T
P
1.0
0.5
CONTENTS
4.1
4.1.1
Economic development.
Indicators of economic development.
4.2
4.2.1
Economic Growth.
Economic indicators of economic growth.
4.3
4.4
4.4.1
4.5
4.5.1
2.0
1.0
0.5
1.5
1.0
0.5
1.5
1.0
0.5
1.5
1.0
0.5
1.5
2.0
2.0
4.0
7.0
4.5
12.0
KEY
LITERATU
RE
2B
8C
9B
4.6
TAA HOURS
Independent
Learning
Activities
4.6.1
Subtotales:
LEARNING STRATEGIES
Interactive discussion by the teacher on economic development to develop a conceptual map of prior knowledge
organizer.
Interactive discussion by the teacher on economic growth to develop a conceptual map of prior knowledge
organizer.
Interactive exhibition on economic development through graphs of the highly developed countries.
Interactive exhibition on the classification of countries with economic growth.
Based on the presentations and with the guidance and constant monitoring, develop a comparative matrix of
economic development countries and countries with economic growth.
Interactive Exhibition characterization of developing and developed countries, through documentaries and
readings suggested by the teacher.
Based on the presentations and with guidance and constant monitoring, develop a matrix comparing developing
and developed countries.
Finding information in diverse sources of economic growth indicators that characterize the BRICS and prepare a
research report.
Modeling by the teacher on economic growth that identifies BRICS countries to develop a geographic map
including: roads, climate, tastes, preferences and socioeconomic indicators.
Search for information from various sources on the origin and destination of foreign direct investment to develop
a pie chart (pie).
Case Study 3 "international economic structure." In team and based on a case proposed by the teacher, analyze
economic levels (Development and Underdevelopment) and stage of economic growth, to draw a diagram on the
characteristics and differences of the components of the international economic structure of each continent
include: economic, mode of production, population, territory, language, currency, environment and type of
government.
i. Presentation of resources, evaluation methods, and objectives of the case.
LEARNING UNIT:
PAGE:
11
OF
15
5%
5%
5%
5%
10%
5%
5%
30%
30%
LEARNING UNIT:
PAGE:
12
OF
15
UNIT OF COMPETENCE
Compare the degree of economic growth in Mexico with its trading partners based on international economic indicators.
No.
5.1
5.1.1
5.1.2
5.1.3
5.1.4
5.2
5.2.1
5.2.2
5.3
5.3.1
5.4
5.4.1
5.4.2
CONTENTS
The Mexican economy from economic openness.
Mexico's entry into GATT.
Mexico and NAFTA.
Mexico and other treaties.
Mexico's trade agreements.
Mexico's economic policy
Mexico's trade policy.
Exchange rate policy.
Structure of the balance of payments.
Balance of payments and exchange rates.
Foreign investment in Mexico.
Foreign Investment Law of Mexico
Foreign Direct Investment in Mexico.
HOURS AD
Teaching
activities
T
P
1.0
1.0
TAA HOURS
Independent
Learning
Activities
3.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
KEY
LITERATU
RE
2B
5B
18C
5.7
5.7.1
Subtotals:
3.0
1.0
1.5
4.0
6.0
6.5
16.0
LEARNING STRATEGIES
Interactive discussion with guided questions about the political economy of Mexico to recover the background.
Pre-reading proposals (anthology) by the teacher on the themes: Mexican economy from economic openness,
balance of payments, foreign investment and business structure in Mexico. Based on the readings and constant
guidance, to elaborate:
a. A conceptual map of Mexico's economic policy based on the National Development Plan 2013-2018.
b. An analysis of the results of the balance of payments current account, trade balance, financial account
and gross international reserves.
c. A double entry matrix that includes small, medium and large companies in Mexico and at least the
following indicators: production, capital, number of employees, main products, exports, industry
involved.
Search for information from various sources on socially and environmentally responsible companies to produce
a research report.
Case Study 4 "Business Structure in Mexico". In team and based on a case proposed by the teacher, compare the
competitiveness of the Mexican company to the international market demand and environmental impact.
Portfolio of evidence:
Concept map
Analysis
Dual input matrix
Research report.
Case Study 4
Objective test
5%
5%
10%
10%
40%
30%
LEARNING UNIT:
LIST OF PRACTICES
PRACTICE
NAME OF PRACTICE
No.
1
"The process of Globalization
THEMATIC
UNITS
I, II
PAGE:
13
OF
DURATION PLACE
14.0
classroom /
III
12.0
classroom /
IV
12.0
classroom /
16.0
classroom /
TOTAL
HOURS
54.0
40%
40%
30%
40%
15
PAGE:
14
OF
15
ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE
PERIOD
UNIT
ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE
1
I, II
Continuous assessment 70% and 30% written examination
2
III, IV
Continuous assessment 70% and 30% written examination
3
V
Continuous assessment 70% and 30% written examination
Unit I. 20% of the final assessment.
Unit II. 20% of the final assessment.
Unit III. 20% of the final assessment.
Unit IV. 20% of the final assessment.
Unit V. 20% of the final assessment.
This unit of learning can be accredited by:
The student may accredit prior learning unit for assessment attend it previously acquired knowledge, integrating their knowledge
(knowing, knowing how, and knowing how to be and live) according to the criteria established by the academy.
be studied in other higher education institutions national and international, who have mobility agreement with the IPN.
Traffic between the ESCA academic units according to the attention span.
KEY
1
2
REFERENCES
* Barkin, J. Samuel (2006). International Organitations. Theories and Institutions. Hampshire, England:
Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 180. ISBN 1-4039-7248-6.
Bertrand, A. V. (2013). State of the World 2011. Madrid: Ediciones Akal. pp. 74-83 and 408-603. ISBN:
978-84-460-3325-7.
Carbaugh, R. J. (2009). International Economy. Mexico: Cengage Learning. 12th Edition. pp.186-308.
ISBN-10: 607-481-035-4, ISBN-13: 978-607-481-035-6.
Chanona, A. (2010) The security community in North America, a comparative perspective with the
European Union. Mexico: Miguel Angel Porrua. pp. 11-66. ISBN 978 607 401 356 6.
Correa, E., Girn, A., Guilln, A. & Ivanova. A. (2011). (Coordinators). The three crises. Economy,
finance and environment. Mexico: Miguel Angel Porrua. pp. 321-342. ISBN-978-607-401-396-2.
Dunning, J. H., Lundan, S. M. (2008). Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy, Massachusetts,
USA: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc., Second Edition. pp. 593-603, p. 707-730. ISBN 978 1 84376 525 7,
ISBN 978 1 84720 122 5.
Heller, Michael G. (2009) Capitalism Institutions and Economic Development. Routledge. New York,
USA. pp. 305, ISBN 0-203-87340-8.
Mendez, M. J. S. (2012), Economic Problems of Mexico and Sustainability. Mexico: Mc Graw Hill. pp.
421. ISBN 978-607-15-0738-9.
Tamames, R. & Huerta, B. G. (2010). International economic structure, Madrid: Alianza, 21 st Edition.
ISBN 978-84-206-9135-0.
Banco de Mexico. Http://www.banxico.org.mx/ Accessed on July 2, 2013.
World Bank. Http://www.bancomundial.org/ Accessed on July 2, 2013.
The comercio.pe. Http://elcomercio.pe/tag/281037/ocde Accessed on July 2, 2013.
National Institute of Statistics and Geography. Http://www.inegi.org.mx/ Accessed on July 2, 2013.
International Monetary Fund. Http://www.imf.org/ Accessed on July 2, 2013.
World Trade Organization. Http://www.wto.org/indexsp.htm Accessed on July 2, 2013.
Ministry of Economy. Http://www.economia.gob.mx/ Accessed on July 2, 2013.
Secretary of Finance and Public Credit. Http://www.shcp.gob.mx/ Accessed on July 2, 2013.
Rionda, R. J. I. (2010). Economic Growth and Regional Development in Mexico (1970 -2010), Published
by the Andalusian University Foundation Inca Garcilaso, p. 109. ISBN-13:978-841571446-4.
Viewed at: http://www.eumed.net/libros-gratis/2013/1263/index.htm on July 31, 2013.
10
11
12
13
14
15
X
X
X
X
X
X
16
17
X
X
18
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
ACADEMIC UNIT:
ACADEMIC PROGRAM:
TRAINING AREA:
ACADEMY:
Economy
Scientific
Basic
UNIDAD DE APRENDIZAJE:
LEVEL:
Professional
II
Terminal and
Integration
ATTITUDES
Be sociable, good
relationship with students,
schedule, be ethical,
responsible and have social
commitment.
DEVELOPED
REVIEWED
AUTHORIZED
DATE:
2013
ACADEMIC PROGRAM:
LEARNING UNIT:
Advanced Architectures
Level:
III
Jadhav, S.S. (2009). Advanced Computer Architecture and Computing. (2a Ed). India: Technical
Publications Pune. ISBN 9788184315721.
Shiva, Sajjan G. (2006). Advanced Computer Architectures. (1 Ed). EUA: CRC Taylor & Francis. ISBN
9780849337581.
Stallings, William (2010). Computer Organization and Architecture: Designing for Performance. (8 Ed).
EUA: Prentice Hall. ISBN 9780136073734.
microprocesadores
ACADEMIC AIM
Thislearning unitcontributesto the profileof the EngineerinComputer Systemstodevelop skills in the designing and
buildinghardware componentsforadvanced andefficientprocessing to create solutions for specific computerissues. It also
provides tools, to obtain a creative judgment, collaborative and participatoryworkandassertive communication.
This unit includes the units Discrete Mathematics, ComputationalTheory, DigitalDesign Fundamentals, Design ofDigital
SystemsandComputer Architecture, as well as,abilitytodesignhardware components inahardwaredescription language,
abilities in documentary investigationanduseofsimulationtools.
AIM OF THE LEARNING UNIT:
The student creates high-performance computing components based on computer advanced architectures.
CREDITS HOURS
THEORETICAL CREDITS / WEEK: 3.0
PRACTICAL CREDITS / WEEK: 1.5
HOURSTHEORETICAL/ SEMESTER:
54
HOURSPRACTICAL / SEMESTER: 27
APPROVED BY:
HOURS AUTONOMOUS
LEARNING:54
CREDITS HOURS/ SEMESTER: 81
_______________________________
Ing. Rodrigo de Jess Serrano
Domnguez
SecretarioTcnico de la Comisin de
ProgramasAcadmicos
LEARNING UNIT:
Advanced Architectures
PAGE:
3 OF OUT
No.
TeacherLedInstructi
onHOURS
CONTENTS
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
1.1
1.1.1
1.1.2
1.1.3
Computing Paradigms
Serial
Pipeline
Parallel
0.5
1.0
1.2
1.2.1
1.2.2
1.0
2.0
1.3
1.3.1
1.3.2
1.3.3
Parallelism Sources
Control Parallelism
Data Parallelism
Flow Parallelism
1.5
2.0
1.4
1.4.1
1.4.2
1.4.3
1.0
1.5
3.0
3.0
4.0
1.5
8.0
3.0
Subtotals:
REFERENCES KEY
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
Framing and team-work organization.
This learning unit will be approached through a learning strategy based on heuristic and analogical methods, enabling
the consolidation of the following learning techniques: worksheet, documentary research, led discussion, concept
mapping,and team presentation of complementary issues and developed of a practical under a case study to evaluate
the performance of a parallel system. Teacher takes the responsibility to decide to subjects of documentary research,
review of case studies, analyzes and simulations performed as well as to set the preparation and handing terms.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Assessment
Portfolio of Evidences:
Worksheet
Concept Map
Team Presentation
Report of Practical
Rubric of Self-Evaluation
Rubric of Co-Evaluation
Evidence of Learning
15%
10%
15%
25%
3%
2%
30%
Advanced Architectures
PAGE:
OF OUT
THEMATIC UNIT:II
No.
CONTENTS
TeacherLedInstructio
nHOURS
T
2.1
2.1.1
2.1.1.1
2.1.1.2
2.2
2.2.1
2.2.2
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
REFERENCES KEY
LEARNING UNIT:
Advanced Architectures
PAGE:
5 OUT OF
No.
TeacherLedInstructio
nHOURS
CONTENTS
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
3.1
3.1.1
3.1.2
3.1.3
3.1.4
3.1.5
Vector Processors
SIMD, MIMD, VLIW, EPIC
Basic Vector Processor
Interlaced or Interleaved Memory
Vector length and separation of elements
Relative performance between vector and scalar
1.5
1.0
3.0
2.0
3.2
3.2.1
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.2.4
3.2.5
3.2.6
Array Processors
Basic Organization
Internal structure of a processing element
Matrix Instructions
SIMD Matrix Multiplication
Associative Processors
Associative Memories on Hardware
1.5
1.0
3.0
2.0
0.5
3.3
REFERENCES KEY
5B,2B,1B,3B,6B,7C
4C
1.0
5%
5%
15%
5%
20%
15%
3%
2%
30%
Advanced Architectures
PAGE:
6 OUT OF
THEMATIC UNIT:IV
No.
TeacherLedInstructio
nHOURS
CONTENTS
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
4.1
0.5
1.0
4.2
4.2.1
4.2.2
0.5
1.0
4.3
4.3.1
4.3.2
4.3.3
4.3.4
4.3.5
Interconnection networks
Timeshare common channel.
Bar Red Cross and multiport memory.
Multistage networks.
Mesh network.
Hypercube network.
1.5
3.0
4.4
4.4.1
4.4.2
0.5
4.5
1.0
0.5
0.5
REFERENCES KEY
P
5B, 2B, 1B y3B
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.5
0.5
1.0
1.0
2.0
Subtotals: 4.0
2.0
8.0
4.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This unit will be addressed from the strategy of case-based learning and heuristic methods and analog, allowing the
consolidation of the following learning techniques: worksheet, documentary research, led discussion, concept mapping,
comparison chart, exhibition equipment complementary issues, work experience, simulations of parallel algorithms and
case studies of multiprocessor systems from Intel and the IBM Cell.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Assessment
Portfolio of Evidences:
Worksheet
Concept Map
Comparison Chart
Team Presentation
Report of Practical
Case study report
Rubric of Self-Evaluation
Rubric of Co-Evaluation
Simulations
5%
5%
10%
5%
10%
15%
3%
2%
45%
LEARNING UNIT:
Advanced Architectures
PAGE:
7 OUT OF
RECORD OF PRACTICALS
PRACTICAL No.
THEMATIC
UNITS
DURATION
ACCOMPLISHMENT
LOCATION
4.5
Computer lab
II
4.5
II
4.5
III
3.0
III
3.0
III
1.5
IV
1.5
Computer lab
IV
1.5
Computer lab
IV
1.5
Computer lab
10
IV
1.5
Computer lab
TOTAL OF
HOURS
27.0
Advanced Architectures
PEROD
1
UNIT
I, II
2
3
PAGE:
Continuous assessment
Written learning evidence
EVALUATION TERMS
70%
30%
III
Continuous assessment
Written learning evidence
70%
30%
IV
Continuous assessment
100%
8 OUT OF
Official recognition by either another IPN Academic Unit of the IPN or by a national
or international external academic institution besides IPN.
KEY
1
B
X
6
7
REFERENCES
Hwang, Kai (1993). Advanced computer architecture: parallelism, scalability,
programmability. (1 Ed). EUA: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 9780070316225 .
Jadhav, S.S. (2009). Advanced Computer Architecture and Computing. (2a
Ed). India: Technical Publications Pune. ISBN 9788184315721.
Parhami, Bhrooz (2007). Arquitectura de computadoras: De los
microprocesadores a lassupercomputadoras. (1 Ed). Mxico: McGraw Hill.
ISBN 9789701061466.
ISBN
Vai, M. Michael. (2000). VLSI design. (1 Ed). EUA: CRC Press. ISBN
9780849318764
ACADEMIC PROGRAM:
FORMATION AREA:
ACADEMY:
Institutional
Basic Scientific
Sistemas Digitales
LEVEL:
Professional
III
Terminal and
Integration
Sequential and
combinational logic
circuits.
VLSI Design.
Hardware description.
FPGAs
Computer
Architecture.
Parallel Architectures.
MEI.
English language
PROFESSIONAL
EXPERIENCE
One-year-experience in
VSLI design.
One-year-experience in
FPGAs development.
Two-years-experience in
handling groups and
collaborative work.
One-year-experience as a
Professor of Higher
Education.
DESIGNED BY
ABILITIES
APTITUDES
REVISED BY
Responsible.
Honest.
Respectful.
Tolerant.
Assertive.
Collaborative.
Participative.
AUTORIZED BY
Date: 2011
Distributed DataBase.
LEARNING UNIT:
LEVEL: III
AIM OF THE LEARNING UNIT :
The student implements Distributed Database Systems through mainly design methodologies and architectural
alternatives for distributed database.
CONTENTS:
I. Distributed Systems.
II. Distributed Database System.
III. Distributed Database Architectures.
IV. Design of a Distributed Database.
TEACHING PRINCIPLES:
The professor will apply a Projects-Based learning process, through analogical methods using analysis techniques,
technical data, charts, cooperative presentation, exercise solving and the production of the learning evidences.
Moreover, an autonomous learning will be encouraged by the development of a final project.
Official recognition by either another IPN Academic Unit or by a National or International external
Academic Institution besides IPN.
REFERENCES:
Elmasri, R. Navathe, S. B. (2007). Fundamentos de Sistemas de Bases de Datos. (Quinta Edicin).
Madrid Espaa: Pearson/Addison Wesley ISBN: 978-84-7829-085-7.
Stefano, C, Giuseppe, P. (1985). Distributed Databases Principles & Systems. Estados Unidos: Mc GrawHill Inc. ISBN: 978-0070108295.
Tamer, M. O., Valduriez P.(1999). Principles of Distributed Database Systems. (Second Edition). Estados
Unidos: Prentice Hall. ISBN: 978-0136597070.
Tanenbaum A.S., Van Steen M. (2007). Sistemas Distribuidos Principios y Paradigmas. (Segunda
Edicin). Mxico: Pearson Education Prentice Hall. ISBN: 978-970-26-1280-3.
Wujuan, L., Veeravalli, B. (2003). Object Management in Distributed Database System for Stationary and
Mobile Computing Environments: A Competitive Approach. USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
ISBN: 978-1-4020-7600-8.
LEVEL: III
CREDITS: 7.5 TEPIC 4.39 SATCA
CREDITS HOURS
THEORETICAL CREDITS/WEEK:3.0
PRACTICAL CREDITS/WEEK:1.5
REVISED BY:
THEORETICAL
HOURS/SEMESTER:54
PRACTICAL HOURS/SEMESTER:27
_______________________________
Ing. Rodrigo de Jess Serrano
Domnguez
Secretario Tcnico de la Comisin
de Programas Acadmicos
Distributed DataBase
PAGE:
THEMATIC UNIT: I
OUT OF
10
UNIT OF COMPETENCE
The student relates issues of Distributed Systems through its characteristics.
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
1.1
1.1.1
0.5
1.5
1.2
1.2.1
1.2.2
1.2.3
1.2.4
2.5
3.0
1.5
1.3
1.3.1
1.3.2
1.3.3
2.0
3.0
1.5
7.5
3.0
Subtotals:
5.0
0.0
REFERENCES KEY
7B
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This Thematic Unit must begin with a framing of the course and the formation of teams. Will be Projects-Based learning
strategy, trough analogical method, with the techniques of elaboration of charts, concept mapping, exhibition in team,
practical and production of learning evidence and the accomplishment of a project proposal.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Diagnostic Test
Project Portfolio:
Charts
Concept Mapping
Cooperative Presentation
Proposal of project
Practical w/report
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics
Written Learning Evidence
5%
5%
10%
20%
20%
5%
5%
30%
LEARNING UNIT:
PAGE:
OUT OF
10
THEMATIC UNIT: II
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
2.1
2.1.1
Distributed Database
Definition.
0.5
1.0
2.2
2.2.1
2.2.2
0.5
1.0
1.0
2.3
0.5
0.5
1.0
1.0
2.4
1.0
0.5
1.0
1.0
2.5
Data Fragmentation.
1.5
0.5
1.0
1.0
2.6
Data Replication.
0.5
0.5
1.0
1.0
2.7
Data Allocation.
0.5
1.0
1.0
7.5
6.0
Subtotals: 5.0
2.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
REFERENCES KEY
8C,1B, 4C
Will be projects-Based learning strategy, trough analogical method, trough analogical method, with the techniques of
elaboration of charts, concept mapping, exhibition in team, advance of the project, practical and production of learning
evidences.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Report of Practicals
Concept Mapping
Cooperative Presentation
Advance of the Project
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics
Writing Learning Evidence
20%
5%
5%
20%
5%
5%
40%
LEARNING UNIT:
Distributed DataBase
PAGE:
OUT OF
10
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
T
3.1
3.1.1
3.1.2
3.1.3
3.1.3
3.2
3.2.1
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.3
3.3.1
3.3.2
3.3.3
3.3.4
2.0
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
3.0
1.5
1.0
1.0
3.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
3.0
1.5
9.0
6.0
REFERENCES KEY
Will be projects-Based learning strategy, trough analogical method, trough analogical method. with the techniques of
elaboration of charts, concept mapping, exhibition in team, advance of the project, practical and production of learning
evidences.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Report of Practical
Charts
Concept Mapping
Advance of the Project
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics
Writing Learning Evidence
20%
5%
5%
20%
5%
5%
40%
Distributed Database
PAGE:
OUT OF
10
THEMATIC UNIT: IV
No.
CONTENTS
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
T
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
REFERENCES KEY
4.1
4.1.1
4.1.2
6B
4.2
4.2.1
4.2.2
4.2.3
Fragmentation.
Reasons for Fragmentation.
Fragmentation Alternatives.
Correctness Rules of Fragmentation.
2.0
4.3
4.3.1
4.3.2
4.3.3
Fragmentation Alternatives
Horizontal Fragmentation.
Vertical Fragmentation.
Hybrid Fragmentation.
1.5
1.5
4.0
4.0
4.4
4.4.1
4.4.2
4.4.3
Allocation
Allocation Problem.
Information Requirements.
Allocation Model.
1.5
0.5
3.0
2.0
1.0
2.0
Subtotals: 6.0
2.0
9.0
6.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
Will be projects-Based learning strategy, trough analogical method, trough analogical method. with the techniques of
exercise-solving, cooperative presentation, practical and learning evidence, the production of the learning evidences
and the presentation of the final project.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Report of Practical
Exercise-solving
Concept Mapping
Final Project
Self-Evaluation Rubric
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics
Writing Learning Evidence
20%
5%
5%
20%
5%
5%
40%
Distributed DataBase
LEARNING UNIT:
PAGE:
OUT OF
RECORD OF PRACTICALS
No.
THEMATIC
UNITS
DURATION
I,II
5.0
Centralized
System.
II
6.0
III
8.0
Partitioning
database.
IV
8.0
TOTAL OF
HOURS
27.0
Database
Algorithms
Architecture
for
distributed
ACCOMPLISHMENT
LOCATION
Computer Labs
10
LEARNING UNIT:
PERIOD
1
UNIT
I
PAGE:
Continuous evaluation
Written Learning Evidence
EVALUATION TERMS
70%
30%
II
Continuous evaluation
Written Learning Evidence
60%
40%
III
Continuous Evaluation
Written Learning Evidence
60%
40%
IV
Continuous Evaluation
Written Learning Evidence
60%
40%
OUT OF
10
LEARNING UNIT:
KEY
1
B
X
PAGE:
OUT OF
10
REFERENCES
Elmasri, R. Navathe, S. B. (2007). Fundamentos de Sistemas de Bases
de Datos. (Quinta Edicin). Madrid Espaa: Pearson/Addison Wesley
ISBN: 978-84-7829-085-7.
FORMATION AREA:
ACADEMY:
Institutional
LEVEL
Basic Scientific
Ingeniera de Software
Professional
LEARNING UNIT:
III
Terminal and
Integration
Distributed DataBase.
Data Modeling
Distributed System
SQL Standard
Distributed Database
Management System
Architecture
Knowledge of the
Institutional
Educational Model
English Language
PROFESSIONAL
EXPERIENCE
A year designs
computational systems
A year experience develop
database systems
Two Years working in
groups and work
collaborative.
A year experience in the
Institutional Educational
Model.
DESIGNED BY
ABILITIES
APTITUDES
REVISED BY
Responsible.
Honest.
Respectful.
Tolerant.
Assertive.
Colaborative.
Participative.
AUTHORIZED BY
2011
ACADEMIC PROGRAM:
LEARNING UNIT:
Evolutionary Computing
LEVEL: III
CONTENTS:
I.
Optimization and bio-inspired optimization algorithms.
II. Biological systems modeling and systems biology.
III. Web applications and high-performance computing in Bioinformatics.
TEACHING PRINCIPLES:
The learning unit will be addressed from the project-oriented learning strategy, the teacher apply the heuristic
method, with which it carried out learning activities that will guide the development of skills of abstraction, analysis
and design of efficient algorithms, using theoretical and practical tools, such is the case for the implementation of
computer programs that demonstrate the concepts of the unit. The activities done in class to encourage students
some techniques, such as collaborative, participatory, brainstorming, graphic organizers, inquiry documents,
worksheets, supplementary statement of issues, discussion and directed the execution of a project software. It is
the responsibility of the teacher decide the features of the project and the programs implemented by fixing the time
of preparation and delivery.
EVALUATION AND PASSING REQUIREMENTS:
This learning unit will be assessed from the portfolio of evidence, which is made up of: formative assessment,
summative and self-assessment and peer assessment rubrics.
Other means to pass this Unit of Learning:
Evaluation of acknowledges previously acquired, with base in the issues defined by the academy.
Official recognition by either another IPN Academic Unit of the IPN or by a national or international external
academic institution besides IPN.
REFERENCES:
Alon, U. (2007). An introduction to systems biology : design principles of biological circuits. (1a Ed.). Boca
Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC. ISBN: 978-1584886426.
Cauldwell, P. (2002). Servicios Web XML. (1a Ed.). Madrid, Espaa: Desarrollos Editoriales, S. L., Anaya
Multimedia. ISBN: 978-8441513631.
Coffey, W.T. Kalmykov, Y.P. (2006). Fractals, diffusion, and relaxation in disordered complex systems. (1a
Ed.). New Jersey: Wiley-Interscience. ISBN: 978-0471725077.
Cormen, T. H. (2009). Introduction to algorithms (3a Ed.). Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262533058.
Goles, E. (2009). Cellular automata: dynamical systems and neural networks. (2a Ed.). Boston: Kluwer
Academic Publishers. ISBN: 978-9048143825.
ACADEMIC AIM
This learning unit contributes to the exit profile of the Engineer in Computer Systems to develop the skills of effective
problem solving in complex dynamic systems modeling of practical problems. It also develops strategic thinking, creative
thinking, collaborative and participatory and assertive communication.
Requires learning units Probability and Statistics and Bioinformatics with the knowledge to the analysis of biological,
Advanced Mathematics for Engineering and Discrete Mathematics with the use of theoretical tools to characterize the
objects of study.
CREDITS HOURS
1.5
REVISED BY:
Dr. Flavio Arturo Snchez Garfias.
Subdireccin Acadmica
81
AUTHORIZED
BY:
Comisin
de
Programas Acadmicos del Consejo
General Consultivo del IPN
APPROVED BY:
Ing. Apolinar Francisco Cruz Lzaro.
Presidente del CTCE
Evolutionary Computing
PAGE:
OUT OF
THEMATIC UNIT: I
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
2.0
P
1.5
T
4.0
P
3.0
Optimization
Artificial Neural Networks
Self-organizing maps
Genetic algorithms
Autoimmune system
2.0
1.5
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.1
1.1.1
1.1.2
1.1.3
1.2
1.2.1
1.2.2
1.2.3
1.2.4
1.3
Subtotals:
6.0
REFERENCES
KEY
4.0
3.0
12.0
6.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This Thematic Unit must begin with a framing of the course and the formation of teams. Will be Projects-Based learning
strategy, trough inductive method, with the techniques of elaboration of charts, technical data and exercise-solving,
exhibition in team, practical and production of learning evidence and the accomplishment of a project proposal.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Diagnostic Test
Project Portfolio:
Technical data
5%
Charts
5%
Exercise-solving
10%
Cooperative Presentation
10%
Report of Practicals
20%
Proposal of project
10%
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
5%
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics 5%
Written Learning Evidence
30%
Evolutionary Computing
PAGE:
OUT OF
THEMATIC UNIT: II
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
2.1
2.1.2
2.1.3
2.1.4
2.1.5
2.2
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.2.4
Systems biology
Biological control systems
Modeling metabolic pathways
Synthetic Biology
Artificial Life
Subtotals:
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
3.0
P
1.5
T
6.0
P
3.0
3.0
1.5
6.0
3.0
6.0
3.0
12.0
6.0
REFERENCES
KEY
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
Will be projects-Based learning strategy, trough heuristic method, with the techniques of charts, exercise-solving,
cooperative presentation, advance of the project, practical and the production of the learning evidences.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Technical data
5%
Charts
5%
Computer programs w/report 15%
Cooperative Presentation
10%
Report of Practicals
15%
Proposal of project
30%
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
2%
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics 3%
Written Learning Evidence
15%
Evolutionary Computing
PAGE:
OUT OF
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
3.1
3.1.1
3.1.2
3.1.3
3.1.4
3.2
3.2.1
3.2.1
Subtotals:
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
3.0
P
1.5
T
6.0
P
3.0
3.0
1.5
6.0
3.0
6.0
3.0
12.0
6.0
REFERENCES KEY
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
Will be projects-Based learning strategy, trough inductive and heuristic methods, with the techniques of elaboration of
exercise-solving, cooperative presentation, practical and learning evidence, the production of the learning evidences and
advance of the project.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Technical data
5%
Charts
5%
Computer programs w/report 10%
Cooperative Presentation
10%
Report of Practicals
10%
Project report
50%
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
5%
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics 5%
Evolutionary Computation
PAGE:
OUT OF
RECORD OF PRACTICALS
No.
THEMATIC
UNITS
DURATION
Efficient optimization
3.0
Bio-inspired optimization
6.0
II
3.0
II
6.0
III
3.0
III
6.0
TOTAL OF
HOURS
27.0
ACCOMPLISHMENT
LOCATION
Computer Labs.
LEARNING UNIT:
PERIOD
1
2
3
UNIT
I y II
III
IV
PAGE:
OUT OF
EVALUATION TERMS
Continuous evaluation 70% and written learning evidence 30%
Continuous evaluation 85% and written learning evidence 15%
Continuous evaluation 100%
The learning unit I is 30% worth of the final score
The learning unit II is 30% worth of the final score
The learning unit III is 40% worth of the final score
Other means to pass this Learning Unit:
Evaluation of acknowledges previously acquired, with base in the issues
defined by the academy.
Official recognition by either another IPN Academic Unit of the IPN or by a
national or international external academic institution besides IPN.
KEY
X
7
X
8
X
9
X
10
X
11
X
12
X
13
REFERENCES
Alon, U. (2007). An introduction to systems biology : design principles of biological
circuits. (1a Ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC. ISBN: 978-1584886426.
Cauldwell, P. (2002). Servicios Web XML. (1a Ed.). Madrid, Espaa: Desarrollos
Editoriales, S. L., Anaya Multimedia. ISBN: 978-8441513631.
Coffey, W.T. Kalmykov, Y.P. (2006). Fractals, diffusion, and relaxation in disordered
complex systems. (1a Ed.). New Jersey: Wiley-Interscience. ISBN: 978-0471725077.
Cormen, T. H. (2009). Introduction to algorithms (3a Ed.). Cambridge, Mass. : MIT
Press. ISBN: 978-0262533058.
Goles, E. (2009). Cellular automata: dynamical systems and neural networks. (2a
Ed.). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. ISBN: 978-9048143825.
Helman, N. Wendell, L. Peisajovich, S. Pincus, D. Sommovilla, N. (2007). Bio
Building Basics: A Conceptual Instruction. Manual for Synthetic Biology. (1a Ed.).
USA: University of California San Francisco.
Kohonen, T. (2008). Self-organizing maps. (3a. Ed.). Berlin: Springer. ISBN: 9783540679219.
Kuri, M. A. (2002). Algoritmos genticos. (1a Ed.). Mxico: Fondo de Cultura
Econmica. ISBN: 9789681663834.
Maimon, O. Rokach, L. (2010). Data mining and knowledge discovery handbook. (2a
Ed.). New York: Springer. ISBN: 978-0387098227.
Mata, C.H. (1966). Algebra matricial con determinantes, espacios vectoriales,
programacin lineal. (1a Ed.). Madrid, Espaa: Dossat. ISBN: 9684228864.
Resnick, M. (2001). Turtles, termites, and traffic jams : explorations in massively
parallel microworlds. (2a Ed.). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262680936.
Sarker, R. Mahammadian, M. Xin, Y. (2002). Evolutionary optimization. (1a Ed.).
New York: Klower Academic. ISBN: 978-0792376545.
Torres, J.J. (2000). Conceptos de cmputo paralelo. (1a Ed.). Mxico: Trillas. ISBN:
978-9682462221.
FORMATION AREA:
ACADEMY:
Institutional
Ciencias de la Computacin
Basic Scientific
LEARNING UNIT:
LEVEL
Professional
III
Terminal and
Integration
Evolutionary Computation
SPECIALTY AND ACADEMIC REQUIRED LEVEL: Masters Degree or Doctor in Computer Science.
2.
Methods of
analysis of
algorithms.
Algorithm design
techniques.
Evolutionary
Computation
Programming
languages.
MEI.
English Language
PROFESSIONAL
EXPERIENCE
One year
experience in the
analysis of
algorithms.
One year
experience in the
use of algorithm
design techniques.
Two years
experience in
handling groups
and collaborative
work.
One year
experience as a
Professor of
Higher Education.
ABILITIES
Analysis and
synthesis.
Problems
resolution.
Cooperative.
Leadership.
Applications of
Institutional
Educational
Model.
Decision making.
APTITUDES
Responsible.
Tolerant.
Honest.
Respectful.
Collaborative.
Participative.
Interested to learning.
Assertive.
DESIGNED BY
REVISED BY
AUTHORIZED BY
ACADEMIC PROGRAM:
LEARNING UNIT:
Bioinformatics
LEVEL: III
Abel Fabre, F. (2001). Biotica: orgenes, presente y futuro. (1 Ed.). Espaa: Instituto Borja de Biotica.
ISBN (10): 84-7100-799-1.
Alonso Bedate, C. Mayor Zaragoza, F. (2003). Gen-tica. (1 Ed.). Barcelona, Espaa: Editorial Ariel. ISBN
(10): 84-344-1241-1.
Ashby, W.R. (1957). An Introduction To Cybernetics. (2a Ed.). London: Chapman & Hall. ISBN (13): 9780412056703.
Attwood,T. K. Parry-Smith, D. J. (2002). Introduccin a la Bioinformtica (1 Ed.). Madrid, Espaa: Prentice
Hall. ISBN (13): 978-8420535517.
Bollobs, B. (1979). Graph theory: an introductory course. (1a Ed.). New York: Springer Verlag. ISBN (13):
978-0387903996.
ACADEMIC AIM
This learning unit contributes to the profile of graduates of Engineering in Computer Systems to develop the skills of
effective problem solving in complex dynamic systems modeling of practical problems. It also develops strategic thinking,
creative thinking, collaborative and participatory and assertive communication.
Requires from learning units Probability and Statistics with the knowledge to analyze information, Advanced Mathematics
for Engineering and Discrete Mathematics with the use of theoretical tools to characterize the objects of study.
CREDITS HOURS
1.5
REVISED BY:
Dr. Flavio Arturo Snchez Garfias.
Subdireccin Acadmica
81
AUTHORIZED
BY:
Comisin
de
Programas Acadmicos del Consejo
General Consultivo del IPN
APPROVED BY:
Ing. Apolinar Francisco Cruz Lzaro.
Presidente del CTCE
Bioinformatics
PAGE:
OUT OF
THEMATIC UNIT: I
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
1.1
1.1.1
1.1.2
1.1.3
1.1.4
Introduction to Bioinformatics
General systems theory
Bioinformatics
Biological sequences
Bioethics
1.2
1.2.1
1.2.2
1.2.3
1.2.4
1.2.5
1.2.6
Basics of Biomathematics
Matrix algebra
Optimization
Combinatorics
Graph theory
Information Theory
Grammars
Subtotals:
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
3.0
P
1.5
T
6.0
P
3.0
3.0
1.5
6.0
3.0
6.0
3.0
12.0
6.0
REFERENCES
KEY
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This Thematic Unit must begin with a framing of the course and the formation of teams. Will be Projects-Based learning
strategy, trough the heuristic method, with the techniques of elaboration of charts, technical data and exercise-solving,
exhibition in team, practical and production of learning evidence and the accomplishment of a project proposal.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Diagnostic Test
Project Portfolio:
Proposal of project
10%
Charts
5%
Technical data
5%
Exercise-solving
10%
Cooperative Presentation
10%
Report of Practicals
20%
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
2%
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics 3%
Written Learning Evidence
35%
Bioinformatics
PAGE:
OUT OF
THEMATIC UNIT: II
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
2.1
2.1.1
2.1.2
Viewing biomolecules
Types of scientific visualization
Generation of computer graphics
2.2
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.2.4
Sequence Analysis
Pattern Recognition
Threading homology
Phylogenetic
Genomics
Subtotals:
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
3.0
P
1.5
T
6.0
P
3.0
3.0
1.5
6.0
3.0
6.0
3.0
12.0
6.0
REFERENCES
KEY
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
Will be projects-Based learning strategy, trough heuristic method, with the techniques of charts, exercise-solving,
cooperative presentation, advance of the project, practical and the production of the learning evidences.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Technical data
Charts
Computer programs
Cooperative Presentation
Report of Practicals
Advance of the Project
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
Rubric of Co-Evaluation
Written Learning Evidence
5%
5%
10%
10%
10%
30%
2%
3%
25%
Bioinformatics
PAGE:
OUT OF
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
3.1
3.1.1
3.1.2
3.1.3
3.1.4
3.2
3.2.1
3.2.2
3.2.3
Subtotals:
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
3.0
P
1.5
T
6.0
P
3.0
3.0
1.5
6.0
3.0
6.0
3.0
12.0
6.0
REFERENCES KEY
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
Will be projects-Based learning strategy, trough inductive and heuristic methods, with the techniques of elaboration of
exercise-solving, cooperative presentation, practical and learning evidence, the production of the learning evidences and
advance of the project.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Technical data
5%
Charts
5%
Computer programs
20%
Cooperative Presentation
10%
Report of Practicals
10%
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
5%
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics 5%
Project Report
40%
Bioinformatics
PAGE:
OUT OF
RECORD OF PRACTICALS
No.
THEMATIC
UNITS
DURATION
Biological information
3.0
6.0
II
3.0
Homology modeling
II
6.0
Biomolecular Simulation
III
3.0
III
6.0
TOTAL OF
HOURS
27
ACCOMPLISHMENT
LOCATION
Computer Labs.
LEARNING UNIT:
PERIOD
1
2
3
UNIT
I y II
III
IV
PAGE:
OUT OF
EVALUATION TERMS
Continuous evaluation 65% and written learning evidence 35%
Continuous evaluation 75% and written learning evidence 25%
Continuous evaluation 100%.
The learning unit I is 30% worth of the final score
The learning unit II is 30% worth of the final score
The learning unit III is 40% worth of the final score
Other means to pass this Learning Unit:
Evaluation of acknowledges previously acquired, with base in the issues
defined by the academy.
Official recognition by either another IPN Academic Unit of the IPN or by a
national or international external academic institution besides IPN.
KEY
X
3
4
10
11
12
13
14
15
REFERENCES
Abel Fabre, F. (2001). Biotica: orgenes, presente y futuro. (1 Ed.). Espaa:
Instituto Borja de Biotica. ISBN (10): 84-7100-799-1.
Alonso Bedate, C. Mayor Zaragoza, F. (2003). Gen-tica. (1 Ed.). Barcelona,
Espaa: Editorial Ariel. ISBN (10): 84-344-1241-1.
Ashby, W.R. (1957). An Introduction To Cybernetics. (2a Ed.). London: Chapman &
Hall. ISBN (13): 978-0412056703.
Attwood,T. K. Parry-Smith, D. J. (2002). Introduccin a la Bioinformtica (1 Ed.).
Madrid, Espaa: Prentice Hall. ISBN (13): 978-8420535517.
Bollobs, B. (1979). Graph theory: an introductory course. (1a Ed.). New York:
Springer Verlag. ISBN (13): 978-0387903996.
Brookshear, J. G. (2000). Teora de la computacin: lenguajes formales, autmatas y
complejidad. (3 Ed.). Mxico: Addison Wesley Longman. ISBN (13): 9789684443846.
Cuevas, G. Corts, F. (2003). Introduccin a la Qumica Computacional. (1 Ed.).
Mxico: Fondo de Cultura Econmica. ISBN (13): 978-9681671051.
Gibas, C. Jambeck, P. (2001). Developing Bioinformatics Computer Skills. (1a Ed.).
USA: O'Reilly. ISBN (13): 978-1600330292.
Grimaldi Ralph, P. (1998). Matemticas discreta y combinatoria: Introduccin y
aplicaciones. (3 Ed.). Mxico: Addison-Wesley Iberoamericana. ISBN (13): 9789684443242.
Grossman, S. I. (2008). Algebra lineal. (6 Ed.). Mxico: Mc Graw-Hill. ISBN (13):
978-9701008904.
Hearn, D. Baker, P. (2005). Grficos Por Computadora Con Opengl. (3a Ed.).
Madrid, Espaa: Pearson Educacin. ISBN (13): 978-8420539805.
Leach, A. (2001). Molecular Modelling: Principles and Applications. (2a Ed.).
Singapur: Prentice Hall. ISBN (13): 978-0582382107.
Sarabia, A.A. (ao). La Teora General de Sistemas: Ingeniera de Sistemas. (1a
Ed.). Madrid, Espaa: editorial. ISBN (13): 978-9681815677.
Schlick, T. (2002). Molecular Modeling and Simulation - An Interdisciplinary Guide.
(2a Ed.). New York: Springer. ISBN (13): 978-0387954042.
Xiong, J. (2006). Essential Bioinformatics. (1a Ed.). London: Cambridge University
Press. ISBN (13): 978-0521840989.
FORMATION AREA:
ACADEMY:
Institutional
Ciencias de la Computacin
Basic Scientific
LEARNING UNIT:
LEVEL
Professional
III
Terminal and
Integration
Bioinformatics
SPECIALTY AND ACADEMIC REQUIRED LEVEL: Masters Degree or Doctor in Computer Science.
2. AIM OF THE LEARNING UNIT:
The student Produces the structural, functional and evolutionary information in biological sequences
biochemical and biophysical knowledge based on coding in the language of biological sequences.
3. PROFESSOR EDUCATIONAL PROFILE:
KNOWLEDGE
Methods of
analysis of
algorithms.
Algorithm design
techniques.
Bioinformatics
Programming
languages.
MEI.
English Language
PROFESSIONAL
EXPERIENCE
One year
experience in the
analysis of
algorithms.
One year
experience in the
use of algorithm
design techniques.
Two years
experience in
handling groups
and collaborative
work.
One year
experience as a
Professor of
Higher Education.
ABILITIES
Analysis and
synthesis.
Problems
resolution.
Cooperative.
Leadership.
Applications of
Institutional
Educational
Model.
Decision making.
APTITUDES
Responsible.
Tolerant.
Honest.
Respectful.
Collaborative.
Participative.
Interested to learning.
Assertive.
DESIGNED BY
REVISED BY
AUTHORIZED BY
ACADEMIC PROGRAM:
LEARNING UNIT:
Cryptography
LEVEL: III
Konheim, A. G. (2007). Computer Security and cryptography. United States of America: Ed. John Wiley &
Sons. ISBN-13: 978-0471947837.
Paar, C. Pelzl ,J. Preneel B. (2009) Understanding Cryptography: A textbook for students and
practitioners. United States of America: Ed. Springer Verlag. ISBN-13: 978-3642041006.
Stallings, W. (2010) Cryptography and network security. (5 Ed.). United States of America: Ed. Prentice
Hall. ISBN-13: 978-00136097044.
Stinson, D. R. (2005). Cryptography: theory and practice. (3 Ed.). United States of America: Ed.
Chapman&Hall/CRC. ISBN-13: 978-1584885085.
Trappe, W., Washington L. (2006) Introduction to Cryptography with Coding Theory. (2 Ed.). United
States of America: Ed. Prentice Hall. ISBN-13: 978-0130618146.
EDUCATIVE AIM
This learning unit enhances the profile of graduates in Computer Systems Engineering providing cryptographic techniques
and tools that allows to protect information in a computer system. It also helps develop strategic and creative thinking,
collaborative work and assertive communication.
Learning units required are Algorithm and Structured Programming, Data Structure, Object-Oriented Programming,
Discrete Mathematics and Probability. The subsequent units are Work Safety and Terminal Work I and II.
CREDITS HOURS
1.5
54
AUTHORIZED
BY:
Comisin
de
Programas Acadmicos del Consejo
General Consultivo del IPN
REVISED BY:
Dr. Flavio Arturo Snchez Garfias.
Subdireccin Acadmica
81
APPROVED BY:
Ing. Apolinar Francisco Cruz Lzaro.
Presidente del CTCE
Cryptography
3 OUT OF
PAGE:
10
N THEMATIC UNIT: I
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
1.0
1.1
1.2
Cryptographic services.
1.0
0.5
1.3
0.5
1.0
Attacks
Ciphertext only
Known plaintext
Chosen plaintext
Chosen ciphertext
2.0
1.0
1.4
1.4.1
1.4.2
1.4.3
1.4.4
T
0.5
0.5
1.0
REFERENCES
KEY
Subtotals: 4.5
0.5
3.0
1.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This Thematic Unit will be Projects-Based learning strategy, trough heuristic method, with the techniques of elaboration
of charts, documentary research, brainstorming, technical data and exercise-solving, lab practical and production of
learning evidence and the accomplishment of a project proposal.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Assessment
Portfolio of Evidences:
Charts
Technical data
Exercise-solving
Proposal of project
Rubric of Self-Evaluation
Rubric of Co-Evaluation
Learning Evidence
5%
5%
25%
20%
2%
3%
40%
Cryptography
PAGE:
4 OUT OF
10
N THEMATIC UNIT: II
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
2.1
0.5
0.5
2.2
Perfect secrecy
1.0
2.0
2.3
Classical cryptosystems
1.0
1.0
2.0
2.0
3.0
1.0
6.0
2.0
Modes of operation
0.5
0.5
1.0
1.0
2.4
2.4.1
2.4.2
2.4.3
2.5
REFERENCES
KEY
2B,3B,4B,5B,1C
Subtotals: 6.0
2.5
11.5
5.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
Will be projects-Based learning strategy, trough heuristic method, with the techniques of charts, exercise-solving,
cooperative presentation, advance of the project, lab practical and the production of the learning evidences.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Portfolio of Evidences:
Charts
Comparison table
Exercise-solving
Lab practical reports
Advance of the project
Rubric of self-evaluation
Rubric of co-evaluation
Evidence of learning
5%
5%
5%
20%
20%
2%
3%
40%
Cryptography
PAGE:
OUT OF
10
UNIT OF COMPETENCE
The student implements public key cryptography protocols, using modular arithmetic.
No.
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.3.1
3.3.2
3.3.3
3.3.4
3.4
3.4.2
3.4.3
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
T
0.5
1.0
2.5
1.0
2.0
1.0
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
0.5
2.5
6.0
4.0
3.5
3.5
REFERENCES KEY
P
3B,4B,5B,1C
Subtotals: 5.0
3.0
12.5
7.5
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
Will be projects-Based learning strategy, through inductive and heuristic methods, with the techniques of elaboration of
exercise-solving, cooperative presentation, practical and learning evidence, the production of the learning evidences and
advance of the project.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project portfolio:
Charts
5%
Exercise-solving
5%
Technical data
5%
Lab practical reports
20%
Advance of the Project
20%
Self-Evaluation rubrics
2%
Cooperative Evaluation rubrics 3%
Written learning Evidence
40%
Cryptography
PAGE:
THEMATIC UNIT: IV
OUT OF
UNIT OF COMPETENCE
The student solves authentication problems in a computer system using digital signatures.
No.
4.1
4.1.1
4.1.2
4.2
4.3
4.3.1
4.3.2
4.3.3
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
Hash functions
Birthday attack
Collisions
Message authentication codes: MAC
Digital signatures.
RSA signature scheme
ElGamal signature scheme
Digital Signature Algorithm (DSA)
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
1.0
1.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
1.5
0.5
0.5
2.0
3.0
1.0
2.5
REFERENCES
KEY
3B,4B,5B,
1C
Subtotals: 3.5
2.0
8.0
5.5
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
Will be projects-Based learning strategy, trough inductive and heuristic methods, with the techniques of cooperative
presentation, practical, the production of the learning evidences and the presentation of the final project.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Charts
5%
Report of project
40%
Lab practical reports
20%
Self-Evaluation rubrics
2%
Cooperative Evaluation rubrics 3%
Written learning Evidence
30%
10
LEARNING UNIT:
PAGE:
OUT OF
RECORD OF PRACTICALS
No.
THEMATIC
UNITS
DURATION
Vigenre cipher.
1.5
II
1.5
II
1.5
II
3.0
II
1.5
III
1.5
Prime factorization.
III
1.5
III
1.5
Diffie-Hellman scheme.
III
1.5
10
Primality test.
III
1.5
11
III
3.0
12
IV
3.0
13
MAC.
IV
1.5
14
IV
3.0
TOTAL OF
HOURS
27.0
ACCOMPLISHMENT
LOCATION
Computer Labs.
10
LEARNING UNIT:
PERIOD
UNIT
1
2
3
I y II
III
IV
PAGE:
OUT OF
10
EVALUATION TERMS
Continuous evaluation 60% and written learning evidence
Continuous evaluation 60% and written learning evidence
Continuous evaluation 70% and written learning evidence
40%
40%
30%
LEARNING UNIT:
KEY
C
X
PAGE:
OUT OF
10
REFERENCES
Konheim, A. G. (2007). Computer Security and cryptography. United States
of America: Ed. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN-13: 978-0471947837.
ACADEMY:
Sistemas Distribuidos.
Basic Scientific
LEARNING UNIT:
LEVEL
Professional
III
Terminal and
Integration
Cryptography.
SPECIALTY AND ACADEMIC REQUIRED LEVEL: Masters Degree or Doctor in Computer Science.
2. AIM OF THE LEARNING UNIT:
The student designs primitives and cryptographic applications using existant algorithms, techniques and
existant tools.
3. PROFESSOR EDUCATIONAL PROFILE:
KNOWLEDGE
Cryptographic
algorithms
Algebra.
Computer Security
protocols.
Algorithmic
complexity.
Programming
languages
Knowledge of the
Institutional
Educational
Model.
English.
PROFESSIONAL
EXPERIENCE
ABILITIES
A year cryptograpy
Actual in
educational as
facilitator of the
knowledge of two
years.
A year experience
in the Institutional
Educational
Model.
Facility with
Problems
resolution.
Cooperative.
Leadership.
Applications of
Institutional
Educational
Model.
Decision making.
APTITUDES
Responsible.
Patient
Tolerant.
Respectful.
Collaborative.
Participative.
Interested to learning.
Assertive.
DESIGNED BY
REVISED BY
AUTHORIZED BY
ACADEMIC PROGRAM:
LEARNING UNIT:
LEVEL: III
Gebali, F. (2011). Algorithms and Parallel Computing (1 Ed.). Estados Unidos de Amrica: Ed. Wiley.
ISBN: 978-0470902103.
JaJa, J. (1992). Introduction to Parallel Algorithms (1 Ed.). Estados Unidos de Amrica: Ed. Addison
Wesley. ISBN: 978-0201548563.
Kumar, V. Grama, A. Gupta, A. Karpis, G. (2003). Introduction to Parallel Computing (2 Ed.). Estados
Unidos de Amrica: Ed. Addison Wesley. ISBN: 978-0201648652.
Paul, J. L. Berman, K. A. (2004). Algorithms: Sequential, Parallel and Distributed (1 Ed.). Estados Unidos
de Amrica: Course Technology. ISBN: 978-0534420574.
ACADEMIC AIM
The program provides knowledge on parallel algorithms implementation; this implementation is according with parallel
systems requirements. The students will work together in collaborative, tolerant, and respectful way; also, they will develop
strategic thinking skills and creative. All this support to graduate profile with knowledge and skills to develop parallel
algorithms that a Computational System Engineer has to know. This program has as antecedent Learning Units to:
Operating Systems, Object Oriented Analysis and Design, Computing Networks, Software Engineering, Data Structures,
Computer Architecture, and Applications to Communication on Networks.
AIM OF THE LEARNING UNIT:
The student develops parallel algorithms through parallel techniques.
CREDITS HOURS
1.5
THEORETICAL HOURS/SEMESTER: 54
AUTHORIZED
BY:
Comisin
de
Programas Acadmicos del Consejo
General Consultivo del IPN
REVISED BY:
Dr. Flavio Arturo Snchez Garfias.
Subdireccin Acadmica
PRACTICALS HOURS/SEMESTER: 27
AUTONOMOUS LEARNING HOURS: 54
CREDIT HOURS / SEMESTER:
81
APPROVED BY:
Ing. Apolinar Francisco Cruz Lzaro.
Presidente del CTCE
PAGE:
3 OUT OF
10
THEMATIC UNIT: I
TITLE: Introduction
UNIT OF COMPETENCE
The student analyzes the objective, characteristics and application of parallel algorithms based on their performance
and optimization.
No.
1.1
1.2
1.2.1
1.2.2
1.2.3
1.3
1.3.1
1.3.2
1.4
Teacher - led
instruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
T
1.0
1.5
Subtotal:
P
0.5
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
0.5
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
3.5
0.5
2.5
P
1.0
REFERENCES
KEY
2B,3B,6C
1.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
Course framing and team arrangement.
This Learning Unit will use Projects-Based learning strategy through heuristic and analogical methods with the follow
techniques: study cases, information search and analysis, teacher led discussions, elaboration of concept maps in
teams of four, and develop of practical 1 in team.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Diagnostic evaluation
Project Portfolio:
Worksheets
Concept maps
Practical reports
Self-evaluation rubric
Cooperative evaluation rubric
20%
60%
10%
5%
5%
PAGE:
THEMATIC UNIT: II
4 OUT OF
10
UNIT OF COMPETENCE
The student implements basic parallel algorithms based on parallelization techniques.
No.
2.1
2.1.1
2.1.2
2.1.3
2.1.4
2.1.5
2.1.6
2.1.7
2.2
Teacher - led
instruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
T
3.0
Basic techniques.
Balanced trees.
Jump pointer.
Divide and conquer.
Partitioning.
Pipelining.
Accelerated cascading.
Symmetry breaking.
Comparison of techniques.
P
0.5
1.0
Subtotal:
4.0
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
3.5
P
4.0
REFERENCES
KEY
1B,2B,3B
1.0
0.5
4.5
4.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This Learning Unit will use Projects-Based learning strategy through heuristic and analogical methods with the follow
techniques: study cases, search and analysis of information, teacher led discussions, elaboration of concept maps in
teams of four, develop of practical 2, 3 y 4 in team, and design of a project plan in teams of four where apply the
knowledge and skills learned in this unit and the previous one.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Learning Portfolio:
Worksheets
Concept maps
Practice report
Project plan design
Self-evaluation rubric
Cooperative evaluation rubric
20%
10%
10%
50%
5%
5%
PAGE:
5 OUT OF
10
No.
3.1
3.2
3.2.1
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.3
3.3.1
3.3.2
3.3.3
3.3.4
3.3.5
3.3.6
Teacher - led
instruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
T
0.5
1.0
Introduction.
Lists and trees.
Ordered List.
Euler tour technique.
Parallel computing on trees.
Graphs.
Routes, expansion and contraction of trees.
Connected Components.
Minimum spanning tree.
Eulerian circuits and maximum matching.
Graph Coloring.
Directed graphs.
P
0.5
3.5
P
8.5
REFERENCES KEY
1B,2B,3B,5C
3.5
2.0
Subtotal:
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
5.0
0.5
8.5
8.5
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This Learning Unit will use Projects-Based learning strategy through heuristic and analogical methods with the follow
techniques: study cases, search and analysis of information, teacher led discussions, elaboration of concept maps in
teams of four, develop of practical 5, 6 and 7 in team, and re-design of the project plan and development of the first part
of the project where apply the knowledge and skills learned in this unit and the previous one.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Learning Portfolio:
Worksheets
20%
Concept maps
10%
Practice report
10%
Project advances report (first part)
25%
Written and oral presentation of the partial technical report 25%
Self-evaluation rubric
5%
Cooperative evaluation rubric
5%
PAGE:
6 OUT OF
10
THEMATIC UNIT: IV
No.
4.1
4.2
4.2.1
4.2.2
4.2.3
4.3
Teacher - led
instruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
Introduction.
Construction of an expression tree.
Optimal parallel algorithm for the evaluation of
expressions.
Optimal parallel processing of regular expressions to
nondeterministic finite automaton.
Generalized expression evaluation.
Efficient algorithms for dynamic programming.
Subtotal:
T
0.5
3.0
P
0.5
P
5.5
REFERENCES
KEY
1B,2B,6C
4.5
1.5
5.0
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
3.0
0.5
7.5
5.5
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This Learning Unit will use Projects-Based learning strategy through heuristic and analogical methods with the follow
techniques: study cases, search and analysis of information, teacher led discussions, elaboration of concept maps in
teams of four, develop of practical 8 and 9 in team, and re-design of the project plan and development of the second
part of the project where apply the knowledge and skills learned in this unit and the previous one.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Worksheets
Concept maps
Practice report
Project advances report (second part)
Written and oral presentation of the partial technical report
Self-evaluation rubric
Cooperative evaluation rubric
20%
10%
10%
25%
25%
5%
5%
PAGE:
THEMATIC UNIT: V
7 OUT OF
10
UNIT OF COMPETENCE
The student implements parallel sorting algorithms based on parallelization techniques.
No.
5.1
5.2
5.2.1
5.3
5.3.1
5.3.2
5.3.3
5.4
Teacher - led
instruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
T
0.5
1.0
Introduction.
Sorting.
Classical techniques.
Sorting networks.
Sorting networks of Batcher.
Parallel optimal merge sorting of Cole.
Theoretically optimal sorting networks.
Borders to compare problems.
P
0.5
P
5.5
2.0
2B,3B,4C,5C
2.0
1.5
6.0
REFERENCES
KEY
5.0
3.0
Subtotal:
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
0.5
9.0
5.5
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This Learning Unit will use Projects-Based learning strategy through heuristic and analogical methods with the follow
techniques: develop of practical 10 and 11 in team, and development of the final part of the project where apply the
knowledge and skills learned in this unit and the previous one.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Practical reports
Project delivery
Written and oral presentation of the final technical report
Learning evidence
Self-evaluation rubric
Cooperative evaluation rubric
10%
50%
20%
10%
5%
5%
PAGE:
8 OUT OF
RECORD OF PRACTICALS
No.
THEMATIC
UNITS
DURATION
1.5
II
1.5
II
1.5
II
1.5
III
3.0
III
3.0
III
3.0
IV
3.0
Parallel
processing
of
regular
expressions to nondeterministic finite
automaton
IV
3.0
10
3.0
11
3.0
TOTAL OF
HOURS
27.0
ACCOMPLISHMENT
LOCATION
ESCOM Laboratories.
10
PERIOD
UNIT
I and II
Continuous evaluation
100%
III and IV
Continuous evaluation
100%
Continuous evaluation
Learning evidence
90%
10%
PAGE:
OUT OF
10
EVALUATION TERMS
The thematic unit I is 10% worth of the learning unit final score.
The thematic unit II is 20% worth of the learning unit final score.
The thematic unit III is 20% worth of the learning unit final score.
The thematic unit IV is 25% worth of the learning unit final score.
The thematic unit V is 25% worth of the learning unit final score.
Other ways to pass this Learning Unit:
Evaluation of knowledge previously acquired with base in the issues defined by
the academy.
In other Academic Unit of the IPN.
In other national or international academic undergraduate or graduate
institution.
If accredited by Special Assessment or a certificate of proficiency, this will be based
on guidelines established by the academy on a previous meeting for this purpose.
KEY
1
B
X
REFERENCES
Cassanova, H. Legrand, A. Yves, R. (2008). Parallel Algorithms (1 Ed.).
Estados Unidos de Amrica: Ed. Chapman and Hall. ISBN: 9781584889458.
ACADEMIC PROGRAM:
FORMATION AREA:
ACADEMY:
Sistemas Distribuidos.
Basic Scientific
LEARNING UNIT:
LEVEL
Professional
III
Terminal and
Integration
PROFESSIONAL
EXPERIENCE
ABILITIES
One year
experience in
teaching
professional level
education.
One year
experience in the
parallel and
concurrent
applications
design and
implementation.
ATTITUDES
Responsable.
Tolerant.
Honest.
Respectful.
Collaborative.
Participative.
Interested to learning.
Assertive.
Academic vocation.
Social and
institutional
commitment
DESIGNED BY
REVISED BY
AUTHORIZED BY
Coordinating Professor
Subdirector Acadmico
Director
Date: 2011
ACADEMIC PROGRAM:
LEARNING UNIT:
LEVEL: III
Michle, J. Q.(2003). Parallel Programming in C with MPI and OpenMP(1 Ed.).EstadosUnidos de Amrica:
Ed. McGraw Hill. ISBN: 978-0071232654.
Pacheco, P. (1996). Parallel Programming with MPI (1 Ed.). Estados Unidos de Amrica: Ed. Morgan
Kaufmann. ISBN: 978-1558603394.
ACADEMIC AIM
This Learning Unit provides students the knowledge and abilitieson the development ofparallel and concurrent systems
required by a computational system, working in a cooperative, tolerant and respectful environment. It contributes to form
the Computer Science Engineer graduate profile in the parallel and concurrent computing field, reinforcing it with the
integration of the acquired knowledge of theOperative Systems, Analysis and Design of Oriented Objects, Computer
Networks, Web Technologies, Software Engineering, Data Structure, Analysis and Design of Computing Systems,
Computers Architecture, Web Applications, Analysis and Design of Parallel Algorithms.
AIM OF THE LEARNING UNIT:
The student develops parallel and concurrent systems based on designpattern techniques.
CREDITS HOURS
THEORETICAL CREDITS/WEEK:3.0
PRACTICAL CREDITS/WEEK:1.5
THEORETICALHOURS/SEMESTER:
54
REVISED BY:
Dr. Flavio Arturo Snchez Garfias
Subdireccin Acadmica
PRACTICALS HOURS/SEMESTER:27
AUTONOMOUS LEARNING HOURS:
54
CREDIT HOURS/SEMESTER:81
APPROVED BY:
Ing. Apolinar Francisco Cruz Lzaro
Presidente del CTCE.
PAGE
3 OUT OF
10
THEMATIC UNIT: I
NAME:Introduction
UNIT OF COMPETENCE
The student analyzesthe objectives and the design characteristics in the parallel and concurrent systems based on
design requirements.
No.
1.1
1.1.1
1.2
1.2.1
1.2.2
1.2.3
1.2.4
1.3
1.3.1
1.3.2
1.3.3
1.3.4
HOURS
Teacher - led
instruction
CONTENTS
Subtotal:
HOURS
Autonomous
Learning
1.0
0.5
0.5
2.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.5
3.0
0.5
2.0
REFERENCES KEY
1B,3B
2.5
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
Course framing and team arrangement.
This current unit will be approached through the projects learning strategy as well as the heuristic and analogical
learning methods, using techniques such as: study cases,information search and analysis, teacher led discussions,
elaboration of concept maps andthe practical 1 in teams.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Diagnostic evaluation Project
Portfolio:
Worksheets
Concept maps
Practical reports
Self-evaluation rubric
Cooperative evaluation rubric
20%
60%
10%
5%
5%
PAGE:
4 OUT OF
10
THEMATIC UNIT: II
NAME:Parallel architectures
UNIT OF COMPETENCE
The student applies the characteristics and operation of the parallel architectures based on the parallel programming
environments.
No.
2.1
2.1.1
2.1.2
2.2
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.2.4
2.2.5
2.2.6
2.2.7
2.2.8
2.2.9
2.3
HOURS
Teacher - led
instruction
CONTENTS
Introduction.
Model of centralized hardware architectures.
Centralized model vs parallel.
Parallel architectures.
Flynn Taxonomy.
SISD Systems.
SIMD Systems.
MIMD Systems.
Shared memory.
Distributed memory.
ccNUMA.
MISD Systems.
Multi-nucleus systems.
Parallel programming environments.
Subtotal:
HOURS
Autonomous
Learning
1.0
0.5
0.5
2.5
2.0
3.0
1.0
2.0
4.0
0.5
5.5
REFERENCES KEY
1B,4B,5C
2.5
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This current unit will be approached through the projects learning strategy as well as the heuristic and analogical
learning methods, using techniques such as: study cases, information search and analysis, teacher led discussions,
elaboration of concept maps and the practical 2 and 3 in teams, and a project plan also designed in teams of four
members that applies the knowledge and skills acquired in this current thematic unit and the previous one.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Worksheets
Concept maps
Practical reports
Project plan design
Self-evaluation rubric
Cooperative evaluation rubric
20%
10%
10%
50%
5%
5%
PAGE:
5 OUT OF
10
No.
3.1
3.2
3.2.1
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.3
3.3.1
3.3.2
3.3.3
3.3.4
3.3.5
3.3.6
3.3.7
3.3.8
3.4
HOURS
Teacher - led
instruction
CONTENTS
Introduction.
Concurrency and synchronization.
Atomic operations and synchronization.
Semantics of concurrentexecution.
Techniques to avoid interferences.
Fine grain synchronization.
Critical section problem.
Tie-breaking algorithm.
Ticket algorithm.
Bakery algorithm.
Barrier synchronization.
Parallel data algorithms.
Semaphores.
Monitors.
Synchronous and asynchronous messages passing
(transfer).
Subtotal:
0.5
1.0
0.5
HOURS
Autonomous
Learning
T
P
8.5
3B,2C,5C
2.5
1.0
3.0
1.0
3.0
3.5
REFERENCES KEY
0.5
8.5
8.5
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This current unit will be approached through the projects learning strategy as well as the heuristic and analogical
learning methods, using techniques such as: study cases, information search and analysis, teacher led discussions,
elaboration of concept maps and practical 4, 5 and 6 in teams, and a project plan also designed in teams of four
members that applies the knowledge and skills acquired in this current thematic unit and the previous ones.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Worksheets
Concept maps
Practical reports
Project advances report (first part)
Written and oral presentation of the partial technical report
Self-evaluation rubric
Cooperative evaluation rubric
20%
10%
10%
25%
25%
5%
5%
PAGE:
THEMATIC UNIT: IV
6 OUT OF
10
UNIT OF COMPETENCE
The student implement parallel systems based on parallel programming techniques.
No.
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.3.1
4.3.2
4.3.3
4.4
4.4.1
4.4.2
4.4.3
4.4.4
4.4.5
4.5
4.5.1
4.5.2
4.5.3
HOURS
Teacher - led
instruction
CONTENTS
Introduccin.
Data and task parallelism.
Formulating parllelism.
Composed Parallelism.
Unlimited Parallelism.
Scalable Parallelism.
Parallel programming techniques.
Blocks of independent computing.
Reducing and exploring abstraction.
Dynamic work assignment.
Static work assignment.
Trees.
Parallel programming.
Programming threads.
MPI programming.
Partitioned global address space.
0.5
1.0
0.5
0.5
HOURS
Autonomous
Learning
T
REFERENCES KEY
P
8.5
1B,4B,6C
0.5
1.0
1.5
3.0
1.5
3.0
Subtotal: 5.0
0.5
7.5
8.5
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This current unit will be approached through the projects learning strategy as well as the heuristic and analogical
learning methods, using techniques such as: case-control studies, information search and analysis, teacher led
discussions, elaboration of concept maps and practical 7, 8 and 9 in teams, in addition to theplan anddevelopment redesign of the second part of the proposed project, applying the knowledge and skills acquired in this current thematic
unit and the previous ones.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Worksheets
Concept maps
Practical reports
Project advances report (second part)
Written and oral presentation of the partial technical report
Self-evaluation rubric
Cooperative evaluation rubric
20%
10%
10%
25%
25%
5%
5%
PAGE:
7 OUT OF
10
THEMATIC UNIT: V
No.
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.3.1
5.3.2
5.3.3
5.3.4
5.3.5
5.3.6
5.3.7
5.3.8
5.3.9
5.3.10
5.4
HOURS
Teacher - led
instruction
CONTENTS
Introduction.
Design patterns and pattern language.
Patterns for parallel and concurrent programming.
Task descomposition pattern.
Datadescomposition pattern.
Task group pattern.
Task order pattern.
Shared data pattern.
Parallel task pattern.
Divide and conquer pattern.
Geometric descomposition pattern.
Recursive data pattern.
Pipeline pattern.
Patterns for parallel and concurrent programming.
Subtotal:
HOURS
Autonomous
Learning
0.5
1.0
3.0
0.5
1.0
2.0
5.0
2.5
1.5
6.0
0.5
1.0
9.0
REFERENCES KEY
7B,2C
2.5
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This current unit will be approached through the projects learning strategy as well as the heuristic and analogical
learning methods, working on practical 10 elaboration in teamsand the final re-design and implementationof the
proposed project, applying the knowledge and skills acquired in this current thematic unit and the previous ones.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Practical reports
Project delivery
Written and oral presentation of the finalreport
Learning
evidence
Self-evaluation rubrics
Cooperative evaluation rubric
10%
50%
20%
10%
5%
5%
PAGE:
8 OUT OF
RECORD OF PRACTICALS
No.
THEMATIC
UNITS
DURATION
3.0
Multi-nucleus systems
II
1.5
II
1.5
III
3.0
III
3.0
III
3.0
IV
3.0
IV
3.0
IV
3.0
10
3.0
TOTAL OF
HOURS
27.0
ACOMPLISHMENT
LOCATION
ESCOM laboratories.
10
PERIOD
UNIT
Iand II
2
3
OUT OF
10
EVALUATION TERMS
Continuous evaluation
100%
100%
PAGE:
Continuous evaluation
Learning evidence
90%
10%
The thematic unit I is 10% worth of the learning unit final score.
The thematic unit II is 15% worth of the learning unit final score.
The thematic unit III is 20% worth of the learning unit final score.
The thematic unit IV is 20% worth of the learning unit final score.
The thematic unit V is 35% worth of the learning unit final score.
Other ways to pass this Learning Unit:
Evaluation of knowledge previously acquired with base in the issues defined by
the academy.
In other Academic Unit of the IPN.
In other national or international academic undergraduate or graduate institution.
If accredited by Special Assessment or a certificate of proficiency, it will be based on
guidelines established by the academy on a previous meeting for this purpose.
KEY
1
B
X
REFERENCES
Clavin, L, Synder, L. (2008).Principles of Parallel Programming (1 Ed.).
Estados Unidos de Amrica: Ed. Addison Wesley. ISBN: 9780321487902.
ACADEMIC PROGRAM:
FORMATION AREA:
ACADEMY:
Institutional
Basic Scientific
Sistemas Distribuidos.
LEVEL
Professional
III
Terminal and
integration
DESIGNED BY
Coordinating Professor
PROFESSIONAL
EXPERIENCE
One year
experience
inteachingprofes
sional level
education.
One year
experience in the
parallel and
concurrent
applications
design and
implementation.
ABILITIES
ATTITUDES
Able to Analyze
andsynthesize.
Able to apply knowledge
into practice.
Problem solving ability.
Team work and groups
management.
REVISED BY
Responsable.
Honest.
Respectful.
Tolerant.
Assertive.
Cooperative.
Participative.
Academic vocation.
Social and
Institutional
commitment.
AUTHORIZED BY
Subdirector Acadmico
Director
Date:
2011
ACADEMIC PROGRAM:
LEARNING UNIT:
Computer Graphics
LEVEL: III
Foley, J.D. (2000). Computer Graphics: Principles and Practice in C. (2a Ed.). USA: Addison-Wesley. ISBN:
978-0201848403.
Hearn, D. Baker, P. (2006). Grficos por Computadora con Opengl. (3a Ed.). Madrid, Espaa: Pearson
Educacin. ISBN: 978-8420539805.
Randima, F. Kilgard, M.J. (2003). The Cg Tutorial: The Definitive Guide to Programmable Real-Time
Graphics. (2a Ed.). Boston, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Professional. ISBN: 978-0321194961.
Rogers, D.F. Adams, J.A. (1990). Mathematical Elements for Computer Graphics. (2a Ed.). EUA: McGrawHill. ISBN-13: 978-0070535305.
ACADEMIC AIM
This learning unit contributes to the profile of graduates in Computer Systems Engineering, to develop the skills of effective
problem solving in complex dynamic systems modeling of practical problems. It also develops strategic thinking, creative
thinking, collaborative and participatory and assertive communication.
Requires learning units Computer Animation with the knowledge modeling graphical objects and computational geometry
using theoretical tools to characterize the graphical objects.
AIM OF THE LEARNING UNIT:
The student implements software solutions to problems in the visualization and graphcis treatment based on Computer
Graphics techniques.
CREDITS HOURS
1.5
REVISED BY:
Dr. Flavio Arturo Snchez Garfias.
Subdireccin Acadmica
81
AUTHORIZED
BY:
Comisin
de
Programas Acadmicos del Consejo
General Consultivo del IPN
APPROVED BY:
Ing. Apolinar Francisco Cruz Lzaro.
Presidente del CTCE
Computer Graphics
PAGE:
OUT OF
THEMATIC UNIT: I
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
History.
Computer Aided Design.
Applications.
Computer art.
Entertainment.
Education and training.
Display
Image processing.
Graphical user interfaces.
Algorithm to generate lines.
DDA algorithm.
Bresenham line algorithm.
Lines parallel algorithms.
Basic transformations.
Representing points in homogeneous coordinates.
Matrix representation of transformations.
Projections.
Orthogonal projection.
Perspective.
Animation
Subtotals:
T
1.0
1.0
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
2.0
P
1B,2B,3C
2.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
6.0
REFERENCES
KEY
2.0
3.0
12.0
6.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This Thematic Unit must begin with a framing of the course and the formation of teams. Will be Projects-Based learning
strategy, trough inductive method, with the techniques of elaboration of charts, technical data and exercise-solving,
exhibition in team, practical and production of learning evidence and the accomplishment of a project proposal.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Diagnostic Test
Project Portfolio:
Technical data
5%
Charts
5%
Exercise-solving
10%
Cooperative Presentation
10%
Report of Practicals
20%
Project Proposal
10%
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
5%
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics 5%
Written Learning Evidence
30%
Computer Graphics
PAGE:
OUT OF
THEMATIC UNIT: II
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
1.0
Concealment of faces.
Calculation of normal
Z Buffer
1.0
1.0
2.3
Light sources.
1.0
2.4
2.4.1
2.4.2
1.0
1.0
2.0
2.0
2.5
2.5.1
2.5.2
2.5.3
Lighting models
Constant model.
Phong model.
Gouraud model.
2.0
1.0
4.0
2.0
6.0
3.0
12.0
6.0
2.1
2.1.1
2.1.2
Polygonal meshes.
Definition.
Representation lists.
2.2
2.2.1
2.2.2
Subtotals:
T
2.0
2.0
2.0
REFERENCES
KEY
1B,3C
2.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
Will be projects-Based learning strategy, trough heuristic method, with the techniques of charts, exercise-solving,
cooperative presentation, advance of the project, practical and the production of the learning evidences.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Technical data
5%
Charts
5%
Computer programs w/report 10%
Cooperative Presentation
10%
Project Proposal
30%
Report of Practicals
10%
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
5%
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics 5%
Written Learning Evidence
20%
Computer Graphics
PAGE:
OUT OF
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
2.0
P
1.0
T
4.0
P
2.0
Parametric Surfaces
Hermite surfaces.
Bezier surfaces.
B-spline surfaces.
2.0
1.0
4.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
4.0
2.0
6.0
3.0
12.0
6.0
3.1
3.1.1
3.1.2
3.1.3
Parametric Curves
Hermite curves.
Bezier curves.
B-spline curves.
3.2
3.2.1
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.3
3.3.1
3.3.2
Subtotals:
REFERENCES KEY
2B, 4C
1B, 3C
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
Will be projects-Based learning strategy, trough inductive and heuristic methods, with the techniques of elaboration of
exercise-solving, cooperative presentation, practical and learning evidence, the production of the learning evidences and
advance of the project.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Technical data
5%
Charts
5%
Computer programs w/report 10%
Cooperative Presentation
10%
Project Report
50%
Report of Practicals
10%
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
5%
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics 5%
Computer Graphics
PAGE:
OUT OF
RECORD OF PRACTICALS
No.
THEMATIC
UNITS
DURATION
3.0
3.0
3.0
II
1.5
A face-hiding algorithm.
II
1.5
II
3.0
II
1.5
II
1.5
III
3.0
10
III
3.0
11
III
3.0
TOTAL OF
HOURS
27.0
ACCOMPLISHMENT
LOCATION
Computer Labs.
Computer Graphics
UNIT
I
II
III
PAGE:
OUT OF
EVALUATION TERMS
Continuous evaluation 70% and written learning evidence 30%
Continuous evaluation 80% and written learning evidence 20%
Continuous evaluation 100%
The learning unit I is 30% worth of the final score
The learning unit II is 30% worth of the final score
The learning unit III is 40% worth of the final score
Other means to pass this Learning Unit:
Evaluation of acknowledges previously acquired, with base in the issues
defined by the academy.
Official recognition by either another IPN Academic Unit of the IPN or by a
national or international external academic institution besides IPN.
If accredited by Special Assessment or a certificate of proficiency, this will be based
on guidelines established by the academy on a previous meeting for this purpose.
KEY
1
B
X
REFERENCES
Blinn, J. (1996). Jim Blinn's Corner: A Trip Down the Graphics Pipeline. (1a
Ed.). San Francisco, Cal.: Morgan Kaufman Publishers. ISBN: 9781558603875.
Foley, J.D. (2000). Computer Graphics: Principles and Practice in C. (2a
Ed.). USA: Addison-Wesley. ISBN: 978-0201848403.
Hearn, D. Baker, P. (2006). Grficos por Computadora con Opengl. (3a Ed.).
Madrid, Espaa: Pearson Educacin. ISBN: 978-8420539805.
FORMATION AREA:
ACADEMY:
Institutional
Ciencias de la Computacin
Basic Scientific
LEARNING UNIT:
LEVEL
Professional
III
Terminal and
Integration
Computer Graphics
Methods of
analysis of
algorithms.
Algorithm design
techniques.
Computer
Graphics
Programming
languages.
MEI.
English Language
PROFESSIONAL
EXPERIENCE
ABILITIES
One year
experience in the
analysis of
algorithms.
One year
experience in the
use of algorithm
design techniques.
Two years
experience in
handling groups
and collaborative
work.
One year
experience as a
Professor of
Higher Education.
Analysis and
synthesis.
Problems
resolution.
Cooperative.
Leadership.
Applications of
Institutional
Educational
Model.
Decision making.
APTITUDES
Responsible.
Tolerant.
Honest.
Respectful.
Collaborative.
Participative.
Assertive.
DESIGNED BY
REVISED BY
AUTHORIZED BY
Date: 2011
ACADEMIC PROGRAM:
LEARNING UNIT:
Computer Animation
LEVEL: III
Foley, J.D. van Dam, A. Feiner, S.K. Hughes, J.F. (2012). Computer Graphics: Principles and Practice,
(3ra. Ed.). EUA: Addison-Wesley. ISBN (13): 978-0321399526.
Foley, J.D. van Dam, A. Feiner, S.K. Hughes, J.F. Phillips, R.L. (1994). Introduction to Computer Graphics
(2a Ed.). EUA: Addison-Wesley. ISBN (13): 978-0201609219.
Hearn, D. Baker, M.P. (1995) Grficas por computadora (2 Ed.) Mxico: Prentice-Hall Hispanoamericana.
ISBN (10): 968-880-482-7.
Rogers, D.F. Adams, J.A. (1990). Mathematical Elements for Computer Graphics (2a Ed.). EUA: McGrawHill. ISBN (13): 978-0070535305.
ACADEMIC AIM
This learning unit contributes to the profile of graduates of Engineering in Computer Systems to develop the skills to design
efficient algorithms in computer animation for the solution of practical problems that require visual display solutions. It also
develops strategic thinking, creative thinking, collaborative and participatory and assertive communication.
Requires learning units Analysis of Algorithms, with the ability to program solutions in a high-level language, Data
Structure, with the use of appropriate structures to manipulate data efficiently and Computational Theory with the use of
tools theory to characterize computational processes.
AIM OF THE LEARNING UNIT:
The student designs algorithms on computer vision and graphics systems based on computer animation techniques.
CREDITS HOURS
1.5
REVISED BY:
Dr. Flavio Arturo Snchez Garfias.
Subdireccin Acadmica
81
APPROVED BY:
Ing. Apolinar Francisco Cruz Lzaro.
Presidente del CTCE
Computer Animation
PAGE:
OUT OF
THEMATIC UNIT: I
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
1.1
1.1.1
1.1.2
1.1.3
1.1.4
1.1.5
Fundamentals of graphing.
Homogeneous transformations.
Changes in perspective.
Graphic primitives.
Techniques polygonal rendering of scenes.
Models of color.
1.2
1.2.1
1.2.2
GPU Programming.
GPU programming model.
Programming tools.
1.3
1.3.1
1.3.2
1.3.3
1.3.4
Generate a storyboard.
Storyboard.
Enhance the script.
Edit the content.
Mounting.
Subtotals:
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
2.0
P
1.0
T
4.0
P
2.0
2.0
1.0
4.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
4.0
2.0
6.0
3.0
12.0
6.0
REFERENCES
KEY
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This Thematic Unit must begin with a framing of the course and the formation of teams. Will be Projects-Based learning
strategy, trough inductive method, with the techniques of elaboration of charts, technical data and exercise-solving,
exhibition in team, practical and production of learning evidence and the accomplishment of a project proposal.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Diagnostic Test
Project Portfolio:
Technical data
5%
Charts
5%
Exercise-solving
10%
Cooperative Presentation
10%
Report of Practicals
20%
Proposal of project
10%
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
2%
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics 3%
Written Learning Evidence
35%
Computer Animation
PAGE:
OUT OF
THEMATIC UNIT: II
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
2.1
2.1.1
2.1.2
2.1.3
2.1.4
Character development
Design Criteria
Character Design
Background design
Staging
2.2
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.2.4
Character Movement
Structure and proportion
Camera movements
Physical Activity
Animation
Subtotals:
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
3.0
P
1.5
T
6.0
P
3.0
3.0
1.5
6.0
3.0
6.0
3.0
12.0
6.0
REFERENCES
KEY
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
Will be projects-Based learning strategy, trough heuristic method, with the techniques of charts, exercise-solving,
cooperative presentation, advance of the project, practical and the production of the learning evidences.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Technical data
Charts
Compute programs w/report
Cooperative Presentation
Advance of the Project
Report of Practicals
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
Rubric of Co-Evaluation
Written Learning Evidence
5%
5%
10%
10%
20%
10%
2%
3%
35%
Computer Animation
PAGE:
OUT OF
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
3.1
3.1.1
3.1.2
3.1.3
3.1.4
3.2
3.2.1
3.2.2
Subtotals:
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
3.0
P
1.5
T
6.0
P
3.0
3.0
1.5
6.0
3.0
6.0
3.0
12.0
6.0
REFERENCES KEY
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
Will be projects-Based learning strategy, trough inductive and heuristic methods, with the techniques of elaboration of
exercise-solving, cooperative presentation, practical and learning evidence, the production of the learning evidences and
advance of the project.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Technical Data
5%
Charts
5%
Computer programs w/report 15%
Cooperative Presentation
10%
Project Report
40%
Report of Practicals
15%
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
5%
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics 5%
Computer Animation
PAGE:
OUT OF
RECORD OF PRACTICALS
No.
THEMATIC
UNITS
DURATION
1.
9.0
2.
Character generation.
II
9.0
3.
III
9.0
TOTAL OF
HOURS
9.0
ACCOMPLISHMENT
LOCATION
Computer Labs.
Computer Animation
UNIT
I
II
III
PAGE:
OUT OF
EVALUATION TERMS
Continuous evaluation 65% and written learning evidence 35%
Continuous evaluation 65% and written learning evidence 35%
Continuous evaluation 100%
The learning unit I is 30% worth of the final score
The learning unit II is 30% worth of the final score
The learning unit III is 40% worth of the final score
Other means to pass this Learning Unit:
Evaluation of acknowledges previously acquired, with base in the issues
defined by the academy.
Official recognition by either another IPN Academic Unit of the IPN or by a
national or international external academic institution besides IPN.
If accredited by Special Assessment or a certificate of proficiency, this will be based
on guidelines established by the academy on a previous meeting for this purpose.
KEY
1
C
X
REFERENCES
Erleben, K. (2005). Physics Based Animation (Graphics). (2a Ed.). EUA:
Charles River Media. ISBN: 978-1584503804.
Foley, J.D. van Dam, A. Feiner, S.K. Hughes, J.F. (2012). Computer
Graphics: Principles and Practice, (3ra. Ed.). EUA: Addison-Wesley.
ISBN (13): 978-0321399526.
Foley, J.D. van Dam, A. Feiner, S.K. Hughes, J.F. Phillips, R.L. (1994).
Introduction to Computer Graphics (2a Ed.). EUA: Addison-Wesley.
ISBN (13): 978-0201609219.
ACADEMIC PROGRAM:
FORMATION AREA:
ACADEMY:
Institutional
Ciencias de la Computacin
Basic Scientific
LEARNING UNIT:
LEVEL
Professional
III
Terminal and
Integration
Computer Animation
Analysis of algorithms.
Algorithm design
techniques.
Computer Animation
Programming
languages.
MEI.
English Language
PROFESSIONAL
EXPERIENCE
ABILITIES
Analysis and
synthesis.
Problems resolution.
Cooperative.
Leadership.
Applications of
Institutional
Educational Model.
Decision making.
APTITUDES
Responsible.
Tolerant.
Honest.
Respectful.
Collaborative.
Participative.
Assertive.
DESIGNED BY
REVISED BY
AUTHORIZED BY
ACADEMIC PROGRAM:
LEARNING UNIT:
Pattern Recognition
LEVEL: III
Marques de S, J. P. (2001). Pattern Recognition: Concepts, Methods and Application (1 Ed.) USA: Ed.
Springer, 2001. ISBN: 3-540-42297-8.
Sergios, T. Konstantinos, K. (2009). Pattern Recognition (4 Ed.) USA: Elsevier Inc. ISBN: 0-12-685875-6.
Simon, H. (2008). Neural Networks and Learning Machines (3 Ed.) USA: Ed. Prentice Hall. 2008. ISBN-13:
9780131471399.
Yaez, C. Diaz de Len. S., M. Juan Luis (2003) Introduccin a las Memorias Asociativas. Serie Research
on Computing Science, Vol. 6, Instituto Politcnico Nacional, Mxico. ISBN: 970-360116-2.
ACADEMIC AIM
This learning unit contributes to the profile of graduate in Engineering in Computer Sciences to develop skills for analyzing
problems, developing systems that solve problems by applying techniques of pattern recognition and evaluation. This will
develop strategic thinking, creative thinking, collaborative work and participatory and assertive communication.
This unit has the units Algorithm and Structured Programming, Object-Oriented Programming, Compilers and
Computational theory as antecedents.
AIM OF THE LEARNING UNIT:
The student develops pattern-recognition applications through techniques and classifiers methods.
CREDITS HOURS
1.5
REVISED BY:
Dr. Flavio Arturo Snchez Garfias.
Subdireccin Acadmica
81
AUTHORIZED
BY:
Comisin
de
Programas Acadmicos del Consejo
General Consultivo del IPN
APPROVED BY:
Ing. Apolinar Francisco Cruz Lzaro.
Presidente del CTCE
Pattern Recognition
PAGE:
OUT OF
12
THEMATIC UNIT: I
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
1.1
T
0.5
1.2
0.5
1.3
0.5
1.4
Supervised Learning.
1.0
0.5
1.5
Unsupervised Learning.
1.0
0.5
1.6
Semi-Supervised Learning.
1.0
1.5
Subtotals:
4.5
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
REFERENCES
KEY
P
3B,4B
4.5
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This Thematic will apply a Case-Based learning process, through inductive and heuristic methods, thus permitting the
consolidation of the following learning techniques: address issues through exhibitions based on documentary research,
led discussion, problem solving and practical work. In the state of the art form the student develops underpins work to
make a concept map. In each topic we propose to move the project to evidence its development so this unit should
submit a proposal.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Diagnostic Test
Project Portfolio:
Concept maps
5%
Technical data
5%
Cooperative Presentation
10%
Reports of practicals
20%
Project Proposal
20%
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
5%
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics 5%
Written Learning Evidence
30%
Pattern Recognition
PAGE:
4 OUT OF
12
THEMATIC UNIT: II
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
No.
CONTENTS
2.1
T
0.5
2.2
Pre-Processing.
0.5
2.3
1.0
2.4
0.5
1.5
2.5
1.0
Subtotals:
3.5
REFERENCES
KEY
P
3B,4C,2C
4.5
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This Thematic will apply a Case-Based learning process, through inductive and heuristic methods using theoretical
and practical tools. Address issues through exhibitions based on documentary research, led discussion, problem
solving and practical work.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Revision of papers
10%
Cooperative Presentation
10%
Reports of practicals
20%
Project advance
20%
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
5%
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics 5%
Written Learning Evidence
30%
Pattern Recognition
PAGE:
5 OUT OF
12
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
3.1
Introduction.
T
0.5
3.2
3.3
T
1.0
0.5
1.0
1.0
Discriminants Functions.
0.5
1.0
1.0
3.4
1.0
0.5
2.0
3.5
1.0
1.0
2.0
3.6
Bayesian Networks
1.0
0.5
1.0
2.5
4.5
0.5
5.5
8.5
Subtotals:
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
REFERENCES KEY
3B,6B,4C
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This Thematic will apply a Case-Based learning process, through inductive and heuristic methods using theoretical and
practical tools. Address issues through exhibitions based on documentary research, led discussion, problem solving and
practical work.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Revision of papers
10%
Cooperative Presentation
10%
Reports of practicals
20%
Project advance
20%
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
5%
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics 5%
Written Learning Evidence
30%
Pattern Recognition
PAGE:
OUT OF
12
THEMATIC UNIT: IV
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
4.1
Introduction.
T
0.5
4.2
1.0
1.5
1.0
4.3
1.0
2.0
2.5
4.4
1.0
0.5
2.0
2.0
3.5
0.5
5.5
5.5
Subtotals:
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
REFERENCES
KEY
P
3B,6C,4C
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This Thematic will apply a Case-Based learning process, through inductive and heuristic methods using theoretical
and practical tools. Address issues through exhibitions based on documentary research, led discussion, problem
solving and practical work.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Revision of papers
10%
Cooperative Presentation
10%
Reports of practicals
20%
Project advance
20%
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
5%
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics 5%
Written Learning Evidence
30%
Pattern Recognition
PAGE:
OUT OF
12
THEMATIC UNIT: V
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
5.1
T
0.5
5.2
0.5
1.0
0.5
5.3
Two-layer perceptron
1.0
1.0
1.0
5.4
Three-layer perceptron
1.0
1.5
2.0
5.5
Back-Propagation Algorithm
1.0
1.0
2.0
4.5
5.5
Subtotals:
4.0
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
REFERENCES
KEY
P
5C,3B,1C
0.5
0.5
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This Thematic will apply a Case-Based learning process, through inductive and heuristic methods using theoretical
and practical tools. Address issues through exhibitions based on documentary research, led discussion, problem
solving and practical work.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Revision of papers
10%
Cooperative Presentation
10%
Reports of practicals
20%
Project advance
20%
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
5%
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics 5%
Written Learning Evidence
30%
Pattern Recognition
PAGE:
OUT OF
12
THEMATIC UNIT: VI
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
6.1
T
0.5
6.2
Learnmatrix.
0.5
0.5
6.3
Correlograph.
0.5
0.5
1.0
6.4
Linear Asociator.
1.0
1.5
1.5
6.5
1.0
1.0
1.5
6.6
1.5
0.5
1.0
1.5
5.0
0.5
4.5
5.5
Subtotals:
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
REFERENCES
KEY
P
3B,7C,2C
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This Thematic will apply a Case-Based learning process, through inductive and heuristic methods using theoretical
and practical tools. Address issues through exhibitions based on documentary research, led discussion, problem
solving and practical work.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Revision of papers
10%
Cooperative Presentation
10%
Reports of practicals
20%
Project report
50%
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
5%
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics 5%
Pattern Recognition
PAGE:
OUT OF
RECORD OF PRACTICALS
No.
THEMATIC
UNITS
DURATION
III
3.0
III
3.0
III
3.0
Neural network
implementation.
Perceptron
IV
3.0
Support
Vector
implementation.
Machine
classifier
IV
3.0
Back-Propagation
implementation.
Neural
network
3.0
3.0
Fingerprint
Recognizer
Memories implementation.
Associative
VI
3.0
Classifier
using
implementation.
Memories
VI
3.0
TOTAL OF
HOURS
27.0
classifier
with
with
Associative
ACCOMPLISHMENT
LOCATION
Computer Labs.
12
Pattern Recognition
PERIOD
UNIT
1
2
3
I , II
III , IV
V
VI
PAGE:
10
OUT OF
12
EVALUATION TERMS
Continuous evaluation 70% and written learning evidence
Continuous evaluation 70% and written learning evidence
Continuous evaluation 70% and written learning evidence
Continuous evaluation 100%
30%
30%
30%
Pattern Recognition.
B
2
3
PAGE:
11
OUT OF
C
X
REFERENCES
Bishop, C. (1996) Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. Oxford
University Press, USA (January 18, 1996) ISBN: 0198538642
6
7
12
ACADEMIC PROGRAM:
FORMATION AREA:
ACADEMY:
Institutional
Ingeniera de Software
Basic Scientific
LEARNING UNIT:
LEVEL
Professional
III
Terminal and
Integration
Pattern Recognition.
Pattern
recognition.
Analysis on
the extraction and
feature selection.
Knowledge about
techniques
classifier.
Programming
Languajes.
Knowledge of the
Institutional
Educational
Model.
English.
PROFESSIONAL
EXPERIENCE
ABILITIES
A year in PR
programming
Actual in
educational as
facilitator of the
knowledge of six
months.
A year in applying
Artificial
Intelligence
techniques.
A year experience
in the Institutional
Educational
Model.
Analysis and
synthesis.
Problems
resolution.
Cooperative.
Leadership.
Teaching skills.
Ability to manage
groups.
Editorial review
and evaluation.
Applications of
Institutional
Educational
Model.
Decision making.
APTITUDES
Responsible.
Tolerant.
Honest.
Respectful.
Collaborative.
Participative.
Interested to learning.
Assertive.
DESIGNED BY
REVISED BY
AUTHORIZED BY
Coordinating Professor
Dr. Mario Aldape Prez
Dr. Benjamn Luna Benoso
M. en C. Miriam Pescador Rojas.
Collaborating Professors
Date: 2011
LEVEL: III
Kimball, R. Ross, M. Thornthwaite, W. Mundy, J. Becker, B. (2008). The Data Warehouse Lifecycle Toolkit
(2nd Edition). USA Indianapolis: Wiley Publishing Inc. ISBN: 978-0470149775
Prez, L. C, Santn, G. D. (2007). Minera de Datos. Tcnicas y Herramientas. Madrid Espaa: Editorial
Thompson. ISBN: 9788497324922
Ricardo, C. M.(2009). Bases de Datos. Mxico D.F.: Mc Graw Hill. ISBN: 978-970-10-7275-2.
LEVEL: III
MODALITY: Presencial
ACADEMIC AIM
Furthermore, this program to provide the knowledge to design decision support system, being caused the independent
learning by means of the use of tools and methods; developing abilities to use different technologies for developing a
data warehouse and data mining for knowledge discovery at database. It contributes to the debit profile reinforcing it
integration of the knowledge of other Units of Learning to plan, to negotiate and to foment the analysis skills; designing
and coordinating projects in the context of decision support systems and database topics. It dominates the practical and
methodological principles, aspects for the construction of systems. Decision making, solution of problems, assertive
communication, and creative, strategic thought. This unit has the units Database as antecedents.
PRACTICAL CREDITS/WEEK:1.5
REVISED BY:
THEORETICIAN
HOURS/SEMESTER:54
PRACTICAL HOURS/SEMESTER:27
______________________________
Ing. Rodrigo de Jess Serrano
Domnguez
Secretario Tcnico de la Comisin
de Programas Acadmicos
Data Mining
PAGE:
OUT OF
THEMATIC UNIT: I
TITLE: Introduction
UNIT OF COMPETENCE
TThe student relates kinds of decision support systems through data warehouse and data mart architectures.
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
T
1.1
1.1.1
1.1.2
1.1.3
1.2
12.1
1.2.2
1.2.3
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
0.5
1.5
2.5
3.0
1.5
2.0
3.0
1.5
7.5
3.0
5.0
0.0
REFERENCES KEY
1B,5C
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This Thematic Unit must begin with a framing of the course and the formation of teams. Will be Projects-Based learning
strategy, trough analogical method, with the techniques of elaboration of charts, concept mapping, exhibition in team,
practical and production of learning evidence and the accomplishment of a project proposal.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Diagnostic Test
Project Portfolio:
Charts
Concept Mapping
Cooperative Presentation
Reports of practicals
Proposal of project
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics
Written Learning Evidence
5%
5%
10%
20%
20%
5%
5%
30%
Data Mining
PAGE:
OUT OF
THEMATIC UNIT: II
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
1.5
1.0
2.1
0.5
2.2
1.5
0.5
1.5
2.0
2.3
1.5
0.5
1.5
1.0
2.4
1.0
0.5
1.5
1.0
2.5
2.5.1
0.5
1.0
1.0
7.5
6.0
Subtotals: 5.0
2.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
REFERENCES
KEY
Will be projects-Based learning strategy, trough analogical method, trough analogical method, with the techniques of
elaboration of charts, concept mapping, exhibition in team, advance of the project, practical and production of
learning evidences.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Report of Practicals
Concept Mapping
Cooperative Presentation
Advance of the Project
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics
Writing Learning Evidence
10%
5%
5%
30%
5%
5%
40%
Data Mining
LEARNING UNIT:
PAGE:
OUT OF
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
3.1
3.1.1
3.1.2
3.1.3
1.5
2.0
1.5
3.2
3.2.1
3.2.2
3.2.3
1.0
3.0
1.5
3.3
1.5
1.0
3.0
1.5
3.4
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.5
Subtotals: 5.0
2.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
9.0
6.0
REFERENCES KEY
2B, 5C, 7C
Will be projects-Based learning strategy, trough analogical method, trough analogical method, with the techniques of
elaboration of charts, concept mapping, exhibition in team, advance of the project, practical and production of learning
evidences.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Report of Practical
Charts
Concept Mapping
Advance of the Project
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics
Writing Learning Evidence
10%
5%
5%
30%
5%
5%
40%
LEARNING UNIT:
PAGE:
THEMATIC UNIT: IV
OUT OF
UNIT OF COMPETENCE
The student designs a data mining system trough knowledge discovery process.
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
REFERENCES KEY
4.1
4.1.1
4.1.2
Introduction
Basic Concepts
Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
2.0
0.5
2.0
3B, 8C, 6C
4.2
4.3
4.3.1
4.3.2
4.3.3
4.3.4
4.3.5
3.0
1.0
4.0
4.0
4.4
4.4.1
4.4.2
4.4.3
Tools
SPSS Clementine
SAS Enterprise Miner
Weka
1.0
0.5
3.0
2.0
Subtotals: 6.0
2.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
9.0
6.0
Techniques of elaboration of exercise-solving, cooperative presentation, practical and learning evidence, the
production of the learning evidences and the presentation of the final project.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Report of Practical
Exercise-solving
Concept Mapping
Final Project
Self-Evaluation Rubric
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics
Writing Learning Evidence
10%
5%
5%
30%
5%
5%
40%
Data Mining
LEARNING UNIT:
PAGE:
7 OUT OF
RECORD OF PRACTICALS
No.
THEMATIC
UNITS
DURATION
Multi-database Architecture.
3.0
II
8.0
Weka Tools.
III
8.0
IV
8.0
TOTAL OF
HOURS
27.0
ACCOMPLISHMENT
LOCATION
Computers Labs
LEARNING UNIT:
PERIOD
1
UNIT
I
PAGE:
Continuous evaluation
Written Learning Evidence
EVALUATION TERMS
70%
30%
II
Continuous evaluation
Written Learning Evidence
60%
40%
III
Continuous evaluation
Written Learning Evidence
60%
40%
IV
Continuous evaluation
Written Learning Evidence
60%
40%
OUT OF
KEY
1
B
X
REFERENCES
Efrem, G. M.(2002). Decision Support and Data Warehouse Systems. USA: Mc Graw
Hill Education. ISBN: 978-0070486843
ACADEMIC PROGRAM:
FORMATION AREA:
ACADEMY:
Basic Scientific
Institutional
Software Engineering
LEVEL
Professional
LEARNING UNIT:
III
Terminal and
Integration
Data Mining.
Multidimensional Data
Models
OLAP
Distributed Systems
SQL Standard
Artificial Intelligence
Techniques
Knowledge of the
Institutional
Educational Model
English Language
PROFESSIONAL
EXPERIENCE
A year designs
computational systems
A year experience develop
database systems
Two Years working in
groups and work
collaborative.
A year experience in the
Institutional Educational
Model.
DESIGNED BY
ABILITIES
APTITUDES
REVISED BY
Responsible.
Honest.
Respectful.
Tolerant.
Assertive.
Colaborative.
Participative.
AUTHORIZED BY
Date:
2011
ACADEMIC PROGRAM:
LEARNING UNIT:
Image Analysis
LEVEL: III
Bradski, G., Kaehler, A. (2008). Learning OpenCV: Computer Vision with the OpenCV Library. (1 Ed.),
U.S.A.: OReilly Media. ISBN- 978-0596516130.
Gonzlez, R., Woods, R. (2007). Digital Image Processing. (3 Ed.). U.S.A.: Prentice Hall. ISBN-9780131687288.
Ritter, G. Wilson, J. (2000) . Handbook of Computer Vision Algorithms in Image Algebra. (2 Ed.). U.S.A.:
CRC Press. ISBN- 978-0849300752.
Soille, P. (2004). Morphological Image Analysis: Principles and Applications. (2 Ed.). U.S.A.: Springer.
ISBN- 978-3540429883.
EDUCATIVE AIM
Furthermore, this program develops abilities to analyze and design efficient algorithms to extract information from digital
images. It contributes to the debit profile reinforcing it integration of the knowledge of other Units of Learning to plan, to
negotiate and to foment the analysis skills; designing and coordinating projects in the context of systems and Image
Analysis. It dominates the practical and methodological principles, aspects for the construction of systems. Decision
making, solution of problems, assertive communication, and creative, strategic thought.
This unit has like antecedents Algorithm and Structured Programming, Object-Oriented Programming, Data Structures and
Computing Theory. It uses some concepts form Discrete Mathematics, Lineal Algebra and Advanced Mathematics for
Engineering.
CREDITS HOURS
1.5
54
REVISED BY:
Dr. Flavio Arturo Snchez Garfias.
Subdireccin Acadmica
81
APPROVED BY:
Ing. Apolinar Francisco Cruz Lzaro.
Presidente del CTCE
LEARNING UNIT:
Image Analysis.
PAGE:
OF
N THEMATIC UNIT: I
TITLE: Introduction
UNIT OF COMPETENCE
The student differentiates between the different type of digital images through their main components
No.
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.3.1
1.3.2
1.3.3
1.3.4
1.3.5
1.4
1.4.1
1.4.2
Teacher ledInstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
Subtotals:
T
0.5
1.0
0.5
Autonomus
Learning
HOURS
0.5
T
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
2.5
2.5
1.0
2.0
3.5
REFERENCES
KEY
P
1C, 3B, 4C
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This Thematic Unit must begin with a framing of the course and the formation of teams. Will be Projects-Based learning
strategy, trough inductive method, with the techniques of elaboration of charts and technical data, exhibition in team,
practical and production of learning evidence and the accomplishment of a project proposal.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Assessment
Portfolio of Evidences:
Technical data
Charts
Cooperative Presentation
Report of Practical
Proposal of project
Rubric of Self-Evaluation
Rubric of Co-Evaluation
Learning Evidence
5%
5%
20%
30%
10%
5%
5%
20%
LEARNING UNIT:
Image Analysis.
PAGE:
OF
N THEMATIC UNIT: II
No.
Teacher ledInstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
2.1
2.1.1
2.1.2
2.1.3
The convolution
The convolution of two continuous functions.
The convolution of two discrete functions.
The digital image as a 2 dimensional discrete function.
2.2
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.3
2.4
2.4.1
2.4.2
Subtotals:
T
2.5
2.5
Autonomus
Learning
HOURS
T
4.5
0.5
4.5
2.5
1.5
1.5
0.5
0.5
2.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
8.0
1.5
13.0
4.5
REFERENCES
KEY
1C, 3B, 4C
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
Will be projects-Based learning strategy, trough inductive and heuristic methods, with the techniques of elaboration of
exercise-solving, cooperative presentation, practical and learning evidence, the production of the learning evidences
and advance of the project.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Portfolio of Evidences:
Technical data
Charts
Cooperative Presentation
Advance of project
Report of Practical
Rubric of Self-Evaluation
Rubric of Co-Evaluation
Learning Evidence
5%
5%
10%
10%
40%
5%
5%
20%
Image Analysis.
PAGE:
OF
N THEMATIC UNIT: IV
No.
3.1
3.1.1
3.1.2
3.1.3
3.1.4
3.1.5
3.2
3.2.1
3.2.2
3.2.3
Teacher ledInstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
Subtotals:
Autonomus
Learning
HOURS
T
2.5
P
0.5
T
3.5
P
2.5
2.0
0.5
4.0
2.5
4.5
1.0
7.5
5.0
REFERENCES KEY
1C, 3B, 4C
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
Will be projects-Based learning strategy, trough inductive and heuristic methods, with the techniques of elaboration of
exercise-solving, cooperative presentation, practical and learning evidence, the production of the learning evidences and
advance of the project.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Portfolio of Evidences:
Technical data
Charts
Cooperative Presentation
Advance of project
Report of Practical
Rubric of Self-Evaluation
Rubric of Co-Evaluation
Learning Evidence
5%
5%
10%
10%
40%
5%
5%
20%
Image Analysis.
PAGE:
OF
N THEMATIC UNIT: V
No.
4.1
4.1.1
4.1.2
4.1.3
4.1.4
4.1.5
4.1.6
4.1.7
4.2
4.2.1
4.2.2
4.2.3
4.2.4
4.2.5
4.2.6
4.2.7
Teacher ledInstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
T
3.0
3.5
Subtotals:
6.5
P
1.0
1.0
2.0
Autonomus
Learning
HOURS
T
4.0
P
5.0
6.0
3.5
10.0
8.5
REFERENCES
KEY
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
Will be projects-Based learning strategy, trough inductive and heuristic methods, with the techniques of cooperative
presentation, practical, the production of the learning evidences and the presentation of the final project.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Portfolio of Evidences:
Technical data
Charts
Cooperative Presentation
Final project
Report of Practical
Rubric of Self-Evaluation
Rubric of Co-Evaluation
5%
5%
10%
30%
40%
5%
5%
Image Analysis.
PAGE:
OF
RECORD OF PRACTICES
PRACTICAL No.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
THEMATIC
UNITS
DURATION
3.0
I
II
1.5
3.0
II
1.5
II
III
1.5
3.0
III
3.0
IV
1.5
IV
IV
IV
1.5
3.0
1.5
IV
3.0
TOTAL OF
HOURS
27.0
ACCOMPLISHMENT
LOCATION
Computer Lab
LEARNING UNIT:
PERIOD
UNIT
1
2
3
I and II
II and III
IV
PAGE:
OF
EVALUATION TERMS
Continuous assessment 80% and written learning evidence
Continuous assessment 80% and written learning evidence
Continuous assessment 100%
Unit I
Unit II and III
Unit IV
20%
20%
KEY
1
C
X
REFERENCES
Bradski, G., Kaehler, A. (2008). Learning OpenCV: Computer Vision with the
OpenCV Library (1 Ed.), U.S.A.: OReilly Media. ISBN- 978-0596516130
ACADEMY:
Ingenieria de Software
LEVEL
Basic Scientist
Professional
III
Terminal and
Integration
Image Analysis.
LEARNING UNIT:
SPECIALTY AND ACADEMIC REQUIRED LEVEL: Masters or PhD Degree in Computing Science.
2. AIM OF THE LEARNING UNIT:
The student evaluates several digital image analysis algorithms through the spatial, morphological and
frequency domains.
3. PROFESSOR EDUCATIONAL PROFILE:
KNOWLEDGE
Image analysis
method using the
spatial, frequency
and morphological
domains.
Programming
languages
Knowledge of the
Institutional
Educational
Model.
English.
PROFESSIONAL
EXPERIENCE
ABILITIES
A year experience
in image analysis
A year experience
in educational as
facilitator of the
knowledge.
A year experience
in cooperative
work.
A year experience
in the Institutional
Educational
Model.
APTITUDES
Analysis and
synthesis.
Leadership
Conflict
management
Group
management.
Fluent
Didactic abilities
Responsible.
Tolerant.
Honest.
Respectful.
Collaborative.
Participative.
Assertive.
DESIGNED BY
REVISED BY
AUTHORIZED BY
Date: 2011
LEVEL: III
Isasi, P. Galvn, I. (2004). Redes de Neuronas Artificiales, Un enfoque Prctico. Spain. Ed. Pearson
Education. ISBN 978-84-2054-025-2.
Pajares, M. Sanz G, De La Cruz, J. (2010). Aprendizaje Automtico Un Enfoque Prctico. Spain. Ed.
Alfaomega. ISBN 978-84-9964-011-2.
Ponce, P. (2010). Inteligencia Artificial con Aplicaciones a la Ingeniera. Mexico. Ed. Alfaomega. ISBN 978607-7854-83-8.
Russell, S. Norvig P. (2009., Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (3rd Ed.), USA. Ed. Prentice Hall.
ISBN 978-01-3604-259-4.
ACADEMIC AIM
This learning unit contributes to the output profile of the Engineer in Computer Systems, to develop the skills of analysis,
design, implementation and evaluation of intelligent systems, also developed strategic thinking, creative thinking,
collaborative and participative work and assertive communication.
Requirements: Discrete Mathematics, ability to demonstrate the validity of arguments by rules of formal logic, from
Algorithms and Structured Programming and Object Oriented Programming, the ability to program solutions in a highlevel language, from Data structure, use of appropriate structures to manipulate data efficiently.
AIM OF THE LEARNING UNIT:
The student develops applications based on artificial intelligence techniques.
CREDITS HOURS
1.5
REVISED BY:
Dr. Flavio Arturo Snchez Garfias.
Subdireccin Acadmica
81
APPROVED BY:
Ing. Apolinar Francisco Cruz Lzaro.
Presidente del CTCE
Artificial Intelligence
PAGE:
OUT OF
THEMATIC UNIT: I
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
1.1
1.1.1
1.1.2
1.1.3
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.2
1.2.1
1.2.2
1.2.3
1.2.3
Intelligent agents
Definitions of intelligent agents
Environment and structure of an agent
Classification of intelligent agents
Building intelligent agents
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.0
4.0
0.5
3.5
1.0
Subtotals:
REFERENCES
KEY
5B, 4C
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
Framing course and the team building.
This unit will address the strategy of project-oriented learning and heuristics, enabling the consolidation of the following
learning techniques: brainstorming worksheet, documentary research, led discussion, concept mapping, project
protocol and practicals.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Diagnostic test
Project portfolio:
Reporting practicals
Worksheet
Concept map
Project protocol
Self-evaluation rubrics
Cooperative evaluation rubrics
Written evidence of learning
30%
5%
5%
20%
5%
5%
30%
Artificial Intelligence
PAGE:
THEMATIC UNIT: II
OUT OF
UNIT OF COMPETENCE
The student implements algorithms based on the different tree search techniques.
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
0.5
0.5
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.5
1.5
2.1
1.0
2.2
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
0.5
0.5
0.5
2.3
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
2.3.4
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
2.4
2.4.1
2.4.2
Adversarial search
MiniMax algorithm
Alpha-beta pruning
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.5
5.5
2.0
5.0
5.5
Subtotals:
REFERENCES
KEY
5B
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This unit will address the strategy of project-oriented learning and heuristics, enabling the consolidation of the following
learning techniques: brainstorming worksheet, documentary research, led discussion, concept mapping, project
implementation and practicals.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project portfolio:
Reporting practicals
Worksheet
Concept Map
Advance of Project
Self-evaluation rubrics
Cooperative evaluation rubrics
Written evidence of learning
30%
5%
5%
20%
5%
5%
30%
Artificial Intelligence
PAGE:
OUT OF
No.
Teacher
ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
REFERENCES
KEY
3.1
3.1.1
Knowledge-Based Systems
Knowledge and its representation
0.5
0.5
5B
3.1
3.2.1
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.2.4
Propositional logic
Syntax and semantics, validity, satisfiability
Logical equivalence, logical consequence
Laws of propositional logic
Logical Reasoning
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
3.2
3.3.1
3.3.2
3.3.3
First-order logic
The language of predicate logic
Normal Forms
Resolution
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.5
2.5
3.4
3.4.1
3.4.2
3.4.3
3.4.4
Knowledge representation
Inference Rules
Forward and backward chaining
Semantic networks and frames
Ontologies
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.5
2.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.5
Subtotals:
10.0
1.5
8.0
2.5
7.5
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This unit will address the strategy of project-oriented learning and heuristics, enabling the consolidation of the
following learning techniques: brainstorming worksheet, documentary research, led discussion, concept mapping,
project implementation and practicals.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project portfolio:
Reporting practicals
Worksheet
Concept Map
Advance of Project
Self-evaluation rubrics
Cooperative evaluation rubrics
Written evidence of learning
30%
5%
5%
20%
5%
5%
30%
Artificial Intelligence
PAGE:
6
9
OUT OF
TITLE: Machine learning
UNIT OF COMPETENCE
The student builds intelligent systems based on different machine learning techniques and approaches.
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
T
4.1
4.1.1
4.2
4.2.1
4.2.2
4.2.2.1
4.2.2.2
Decision-tree learning
Decision-tree representation
Learning algorithms
ID3
C4.5
0.5
0.5
4.3
4.3.1
4.3.2
4.3.3
4.3.4
1.0
0.5
1.0
1.0
4.4
4.4.1
4.4.2
4.4.3
Genetic algorithms
Introduction
Elements, operators, parameters
Applications
0.5
0.5
1.0
4.5
4.5.1
4.5.2
0.5
1.0
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
REFERENCES
KEY
P
1B,2B,3B,4C,4B
Subtotals:
0.5
0.5
1.0
0.5
9.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
2.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.0
0.5
2.5
0.5
0.5
1.0
0.5
2.5
1.0
1.0
1.5
8.5
7.5
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This unit will address the strategy of project-oriented learning and heuristics, enabling the consolidation of the following
learning techniques: brainstorming worksheet, documentary research, led discussion, concept mapping, project
implementation and practicals.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project portfolio:
Reporting practicals
Worksheet
Concept Map
Project Report
Self-evaluation rubrics
Cooperative evaluation rubrics
30%
5%
5%
50%
5%
5%
Artificial Intelligence
PAGE:
OUT OF
RECORD OF PRACTICALS
No.
THEMATIC
UNITS
DURATION
Intelligent agent
1.5
Searching solutions
II
1.5
Blind search
II
2.0
Heuristic search
II
2.0
Adversarial search
II
2.0
Logic Programming
III
3.0
Knowledge representation
III
3.0
III
3.0
Decision trees
IV
3.0
10
Neural network
IV
3.0
11
Genetic algorithm
IV
3.0
TOTAL OF
HOURS
27.0
ACCOMPLISHMENT
LOCATION
Laboratorio de Cmputo.
LEARNING UNIT:
PAGE:
PERIOD
UNIT
I y II
Continuous evaluation
Written evidence of learning
70%
30%
III
Continuous evaluation
Written evidence of learning
70%
30%
IV
Continuous evaluation
100%
OUT OF
EVALUATION TERMS
KEY
1
B
X
REFERENCES
Araujo, L. Cervigon, C. (2009). Algoritmos Evolutivos, Un Enfoque
Prctico. Spain. Ed. Alfaomega. ISBN 978-84-7897-911-0.
ACADEMIC PROGRAM:
FORMATION AREA:
ACADEMY:
Institutional
Ingeniera de Software
Basic Scientific
LEARNING UNIT:
III
LEVEL
Professional
Terminal and
Integration
Artificial Intelligence
SPECIALTY AND ACADEMIC REQUIRED LEVEL: Masters Degree or Doctor in Computer Science.
2. AIM OF THE LEARNING UNIT:
The student develops applications based on artificial intelligence techniques.
3. PROFESSOR EDUCATIONAL PROFILE:
KNOWLEDGE
Lgic
Intelligent agents
Search techniques
Knowledge-Based
Systems
Machine learning
Neural networks
Evolutionary
algorithms
Knowledge
of
the
Institutional
Educational Model.
English
PROFESSIONAL
EXPERIENCE
ABILITIES
Experiencia de dos
aos diseando e
implementando
sistemas
computacionales.
Experiencia de un ao
diseando e
implementando
Sistemas inteligentes.
Experiencia de un ao
como Docente de
Nivel Superior.
Experiencia de un ao
en manejo de grupos y
trabajo colaborativo.
APTITUDES
Responsible.
Tolerant.
Honest.
Respectful.
Collaborative.
Participative.
Interested to learning.
Assertive.
Social and
institutional
commitment
DESIGNED BY
REVISED BY
AUTHORIZED BY
COORDINATING PROFESOR
Dr. Benjamn Luna Benoso
COLLABORATING PROFESSOR
Date:
2011
ACADEMIC PROGRAM:
LEARNING UNIT:
LEVEL: III
ACADEMIC AIM
This learning unit contributes to the profile of graduates of Ingeniera en Sistemas Computacionales, developing the
skills of designing and developing applications for mobile devices to know the different platforms, development
environments and elements of applications for mobile devices attached to the standards of quality and extent of existing
architectures. Generic skills. Likewise, invigorate the powers of creative thinking, assertive communication, collaborative
work.
It requires learning units as well as Software Engineering Object Oriented Programming the ability to program solutions
in a high-level language, Data Structure, the use of appropriate structures to manipulate data efficiently and
Technologies for developing Web applications on the Internet. Work units are consistent Trabajo Terminal I and Trabajo
Terminal II.
AIM OF THE LEARNING UNIT:
The student develops programs and applications for different mobile platforms based on the most appropriate
technology.
CREDITS HOURS
REVISED BY:
54
81
AUTHORIZED BY:
Comisin de Programas Acadmicos
del Consejo General Consultivo del
IPN. 2011
_______________________________
Ing. Rodrigo de Jess Serrano
Domnguez
Secretario Tcnico de la Comisin
de Programas Acadmicos
PAGE:
OUT OF
10
THEMATIC UNIT: I
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
T
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.6.1
1.6.2
1.6.3
1.6.4
1.6.5
Programming paradigms
Structured programming
Object Oriented Programming
Oriented Programming Events
Service Oriented Programming
Oriented Programming Mobile Devices
Mobility
Services
Prosecution
Connecting to Databases
Interfaces
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.5
Subtotals:
4.0
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
1.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
REFERENCES KEY
1C,2B,3B,4C,5C
1.0
1.5
2.0
1.0
1.5
1.0
1.0
5.0
5.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This unit will address the strategy from project-oriented learning and heuristics, enabling the consolidation of the
following learning techniques: brainstorming, worksheets, inquiry documentary, directed discussion, concept mapping,
resolution problems, exposure to additional topics and team work experience.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Diagnostic Test
Proyect Portfolio:
Proposal of project
10%
Charts
5%
Technical data
5%
Exercise-solving
10%
Cooperative Presentation
10%
Report of Practicals
20%
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
5%
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics 5%
Written Learning Evidence
30%
PAGE:
OUT OF
10
THEMATIC UNIT: II
No.
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.7.1
2.7.2
2.7.3
2.7.4
2.7.5
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
Model N - Layers
Architecture and user interface controls
Messaging Architecture
Communications architecture
Storage Architecture
SOA Service Architecture
Platforms
PDA
Pocket PC
Mobile Phones
Tablet PC
MAC Ipack and services
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.0
0.5
1.0
1.0
0.5
2.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
0.5
REFERENCES KEY
1C,2B,3B,4C,5C
1.0
Subtotals: 4.0
1.5
7.0
4.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
In this unit will be addressed from the project-oriented learning strategy and huerstic method, enabling the
consolidation of the following learning techniques: inquiry document, worksheet, guided discussion, table of
comparisons, computer programs, exposure complementary team issues, project proposal and work experience.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Proyect Portfolio:
Advance of project
10%
Charts
5%
Technical data
5%
Computer programs w/report 20%
Cooperative Presentation
10%
Report of Practicals
20%
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
5%
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics 5%
Written Learning Evidence
20%
PAGE:
OUT OF
10
No.
CONTENTS
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
0.5
2.0
1.0
1.5
1.0
2.0
1.0
1.5
1.0
3.1
XML
1.0
3.2
1.0
3.3
J2ME
1.0
3.4
CE.NET
1.0
1.0
REFERENCES KEY
1C,2B,3B,4C,5C
Subtotals: 4.0
1.5
7.0
4.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This unit will be addressed from the project-oriented learning strategy and heuristics, enabling the consolidation of the
following learning techniques: inquiry document, worksheet, guided discussion, table of comparisons, computer
program, exposure complementary team issues, project implementation and completion practices.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Proyect Portfolio:
Charts
5%
Technical data
5%
Computer programs w/report 20%
Cooperative Presentation
10%
Report of Practicals
20%
Advance of project
30%
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
5%
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics 5%
LEARNING UNIT:
PAGE:
THEMATIC UNIT: IV
OUT OF
10
UNIT OF COMPETENCE
The student develops mobile applications based on the main development tools and standards set for different
platforms.
No.
CONTENTS
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
T
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
Emulators
Development Environments (IDE)
Development Libraries
Mobile Programming Security
Multimedia
Communication
0.5
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.0
P
0.5
1.0
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
1.0
1.0
1.5
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
REFERENCES KEY
1C,2B,3B,4C,5C
1.0
1.0
Subtotals: 4.0
1.5
7.0
4.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This unit will be addressed from the project-oriented learning strategy, and heuristics, enabling the consolidation of the
following learning techniques: inquiry document, worksheet, guided discussion, table of comparisons, computer
program, exposure a team of complementary subjects, project implementation and completion practices.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Proyect Portfolio:
Charts
5%
Technical data
5%
Computer programs w/report 20%
Cooperative Presentation
10%
Report of Practicals
20%
Advance of project
30%
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
5%
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics 5%
LEARNING UNIT:
PAGE:
THEMATIC UNIT: V
OUT OF
10
UNIT OF COMPETENCE
The student deploys mobile applications, based on its specific purpose.
No.
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.6
CONTENTS
Mobile Agents
Communication Applications
Educational Applications
Electronic Commerce Applications
Applications Personal Services
Mobile Security
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
1.0
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.5
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
REFERENCES KEY
1C,2B,3B,4C,5C
Subtotals: 4.0
1.0
8.0
3.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This unit will be addressed from the project-oriented learning strategy and heuristics, enabling the consolidation of the
following learning techniques: inquiry document, worksheet, guided discussion, table of comparisons, computer
program, exposure complementary team issues, project implementation and completion practices.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Proyect Portfolio:
Charts
5%
Technical data
5%
Computer programs w/report 20%
Cooperative Presentation
10%
Report of Practicals
20%
Project evaluation
30%
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
5%
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics 5%
PAGE:
OUT OF
RECORD OF PRACTICALS
No.
THEMATIC
UNITS
DURATION
6.5
II
5.5
III
5.5
4.
Native applications
IV
5.5
4.0
TOTAL OF
HOURS
27.0
ACCOMPLISHMENT
LOCATION
Computer Labs.
10
PAGE:
UNIT
I
EVALUATION TERMS
Continuous evaluation 70% and written learning evidence 30%
II
III
IV y V
OUT OF
10
KEY
1
C
X
REFERENCES
Ballard, B. (2009). Designing the Mobile User Experience. England : John
Wiley & Sons Ltd. ISBN 9780470033616.
FORMATION AREA:
ACADEMY:
III
LEVEL
Institutional
Basic Scientific
Ingeniera de Software
Professional
LEARNING UNIT:
Terminal and
Integration
Application Development
for Mobile Devices
Programming
languages.
Web Technologies.
Software Engineering.
Databases
Web Site
Administration
English language
PROFESSIONAL
EXPERIENCE
A year in web programming
Actual in educational as
facilitator of the knowledge
of six months.
Six months in the handling
of equipment of calculation.
A year experience in the
Institutional Educational
Model.
ABILITIES
APTITUDES
Analysis and
synthesis.
Problems resolution.
Cooperative.
Leadership.
Applications of
Institutional
Educational Model.
Decision making.
Responsible.
Tolerant.
Honest.
Respectful.
Collaborative.
Participative.
Interested to
learning.
Assertive.
DESIGNED BY
REVISED BY
AUTHORIZED BY
COORDINATING PROFESOR
M. en C. Mnica Rivera De La Rosa
M. en C. Gabriela de Jess Lopez Ruiz
COLLABORATING PROFESSORS
Date:
2011
ACADEMIC PROGRAM:
LEARNING UNIT:
LEVEL: III
TEACHING PRINCIPLES:
This unit will be addressed using the project-oriented learning strategy and the heuristic method, therefore, the
student will carry out activities that will guide the development of skills of abstraction, analysis and design of
efficient algorithms, using Java Web development technologies, implementing computer programs that
demonstrate the concepts of the learning unit. The activities to be carried out in class, these will encourage in
students some techniques, such as: collaborative and participatory work, brainstorming, graphic organizers,
documentary research, worksheets, exposition of complementary topics, led discussionand implementasoftware
project. Itis the responsibility of the teacher to decide the features of the project and the developed programs,
setting the time for preparation and delivery.
EVALUATION AND PASSING REQUIREMENTS:
This learning unit will be evaluated from the project portfolio, which is formed of: formative and summative,
evaluation, self-evaluation and cooperative evaluation rubrics.
Other means to approve this learning unit:
Evaluation of previously acquired knowledge, based on the guidelines established by the academy..
Accreditation in another academic unit of the IPN or othernationalorinternationaleducational institution.in
addition to the IPN.
REFERENCES:
Bauer C. King, G. (2007).Java Persistence with Hibernate. USA. Ed. Manning. ISBN: 978-19-3239-488-7.
Brunner, R. (2003). JSP: Practical Guide for Programmers. USA. Ed. Morgan Kaufmann. ISBN: 1-55860836-2.
Chopra, V. Li, S.Genender, J. (2008).Professional Apache Tomcat. USA. Ed.Willey. ISBN: 978-04-7175361-2.
David, G. (2008). Core Java Server Faces (2nd. Ed.), USA. Pearson Education. ISBN: 978-81-3171-944-2.
Holmes, J. (2006). Struts: The Complete Reference.USA. Ed. McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 978-00-7226-386-2.
ACADEMIC AIM
This learning unit contributes to the output profile of the Engineer in Computer Systems, to develop the skills of analysis,
design, implementation and evaluation of Web applications, also developed strategic thinking, creative thinking,
collaborative and participative work and assertive communication.
Requirements: Object Oriented Programming, the ability to program solutions in a high-level language, from Databases,
the ability to design database models, from Computer Networks, use of communication protocols and standards, from
Analysis and Object Oriented Design the ability to analyze and design information systems and from Web Technologies
the ability to use appropriate technologies for the development of efficient Web-based applications.
AIM OF THE LEARNING UNIT
The student develops Web applications based on Java technology.
CREDITS HOURS
1.5
REVISED BY:
Dr. Flavio Arturo Snchez Garfias.
Subdireccin Acadmica
81
APPROVED BY:
Ing. Apolinar Francisco Cruz Lzaro.
Presidente del CTCE
PAGE:
OUT OF
THEMATIC UNIT: I
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
T
1.1
1.1.1
1.1.2
1.2
1.2.1
1.2.2
1.3
1.3.1
1.3.2
J2EE Architecture
Multilayer architectures
The J2EE standard
Application Servers
Web Servers
Tomcat Application Server
Structure of a Web application
Directory Structure
Configuration Files
Subtotals:
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.5
REFERENCES
KEY
P
3B
1.0
0.5
2.0
1.0
3.0
0.5
4.5
1.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
Framing course and the team building.
This unit will address the strategy of project-oriented learning and heuristics, enabling the consolidation of the following
learning techniques: brainstorming worksheet, documentary research, led discussion, concept mapping, project
protocol and practicals.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Diagnostic test
Project portfolio:
Reporting practicals
Worksheet
Concept map
Project protocol
Self-evaluation rubrics
Cooperative evaluation rubrics
Written evidence of learning
30%
5%
5%
20%
5%
5%
30%
PAGE:
4 OUT OF
THEMATIC UNIT: II
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
T
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
2.3.4
2.4
2.5
2.5
Introduction to Servlets
Life Cycle and the Servlet API
Context of HttpServlets
Parameters
Sessions
Attributes
Cookies
Filters
Connection pool
Developing Applications with Servlets
0.5
1.0
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
Subtotals:
5.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
3B, 6B
2.0
0.5
1.0
0.5
0.5
1.0
1.0
0.5
1.5
REFERENCES
KEY
2.0
2.0
5.5
6.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This unit will address the strategy of project-oriented learning and heuristics, enabling the consolidation of the following
learning techniques: brainstorming worksheet, documentary research, led discussion, concept mapping, project
implementation and practicals.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project portfolio:
Reporting practicals
Worksheet
Concept Map
Project implementation
Self-evaluation rubrics
Cooperative evaluation rubrics
Written evidence of learning
30%
5%
5%
20%
5%
5%
30%
PAGE:
OUT OF
THEMATIC UNIT:III
No.
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
Introduction to JSP
Elements of JSP: directives, declarations, scriplets,
expressions, actions
Context: embedded objects, sessions
JavaBeans
Custom tags and taglibs
Subtotals:
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
1.5
2.5
0.5
0.5
1.5
1.0
2.0
1.5
1.5
0.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
3.0
3.0
1.0
2.0
2.0
9.0
3.0
9.0
6.0
REFERENCES
KEY
2B, 3B,8C
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This unit will address the strategy of project-oriented learning and heuristics, enabling the consolidation of the following
learning techniques: brainstorming worksheet, documentary research, led discussion, concept mapping, project
implementation and practicals.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project portfolio:
Reporting practicals
Worksheet
Concept Map
Project implementation
Self-evaluation rubrics
Cooperative evaluation rubrics
Written evidence of learning
30%
5%
5%
20%
5%
5%
30%
PAGE:
OUT OF
THEMATIC UNIT:IV
TITLE: Frameworks
UNIT OF COMPETENCE
The student buildsWeb applications based on JavaFrameworks
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
T
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
0.5
1.5
1.0
3.0
3.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.5
1.0
3.0
3.0
2.5
2.5
2.5
9.0
1.5
9.0
7.5
REFERENCES
KEY
P
1B, 4B, 5B,
7B, 8C
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This unit will address the strategy of project-oriented learning and heuristics, enabling the consolidation of the following
learning techniques: brainstorming worksheet, documentary research, led discussion, concept mapping, project
implementation and practicals.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project portfolio:
Reporting practicals
Worksheet
Concept Map
Project implementation
Self-evaluation rubrics
Cooperative evaluation rubrics
30%
5%
5%
50%
5%
5%
PAGE:
OUT OF
RECORD OF PRACTICALS
No.
THEMATIC
UNITS
DURATION
1.5
Simple Servlet
II
1.5
Using filters
II
3.0
4.
Servlet-based application
II
3.0
Simple JSP
III
1.5
III
1.5
JavaBeans
III
3.0
Taglibs
III
3.0
STRUTS-based application
IV
3.0
10
Hibernate-based application
IV
3.0
11
JSF-based application
IV
TOTAL OF
HOURS
3.0
27
ACCOMPLISHMENT
LOCATION
Computer labs
UNIT
I y II
III
IV
PAGE:
OUT OF 9
EVALUATION TERMS
Continuous evaluation 70%
Written evidenceof learning
30%
Continuous evaluation 70%
Written evidence of learning
30%
KEY
1
B
X
Brunner, R. (2003). JSP: Practical Guide for Programmers. USA. Ed. Morgan
Kaufmann. ISBN: 1-55860-836-2.
David, G. (2008). Core Java Server Faces (2nd. Ed.), USA. Pearson Education.
ISBN: 978-81-3171-944-2.
REFERENCES
Bauer C. King, G. (2007).JavaPersistence with Hibernate. USA. Ed. Manning. ISBN:
978-19-3239-488-7.
Web,
un
enfoque
ACADEMIC PROGRAM:
Ingeniera en SistemasComputacionales.
FORMATION AREA:
ACADEMY:
Institutional
Ingeniera de Software
Basic Scientific
LEARNING UNIT:
LEVEL
Professional
III
Terminal and
Integration
PROFESSIONAL
EXPERIENCE
Two years designing
and implementing
computer systems.
A year designing and
implementing Web
applications.
One year as a
Professor of Higher
Education.
A year in management
and collaborative work
groups.
ABILITIES
APTITUDES
Responsible.
Tolerant.
Honest.
Respectful.
Collaborative.
Participative.
Interested to learning.
Assertive.
Social and
institutional
commitment
DESIGNED BY
REVISED BY
AUTHORIZED BY
COORDINATING PROFESSOR
Mnica Rivera de la Rosa
Rubn Peredo Valderrama
Ulises Vlez Saldaa
COLLABORATING PROFESSORS
Date: 2011
LEVEL: III
BFar, R. (2005). Mobile Computing Principles. Mxico: United Kingdom. Ed. Cambridge University Press.
ISBN 9780521817332
Filing, B. (2009). Mobile Design and Development. Estados Unidos de Amrica: Ed. OReilly.
ISBN: 9780596155445.
Lee, V. (2004). Mobile Applications. Estados Unidos de Amrica: Prentice Hall. ISBN 9780131172638.
Mehta, N. (2008). Mobile Web Development. Estados Unidos de Amrica: Packt Publishing
ISBN 9781847193438.
ACADEMIC AIM
This learning unit contributes to the graduate profile of the Engineer in computational systems, to develop the skills of
analysis and design of applications for mobile devices by knowing the different modeling techniques and design as well
as the best practices to obtain applications tied to the standards of quality and the extent of existing architectures.
Moreover, stimulate the powers of creative thinking, critical and reflexive, assertive communication and collaborative
work.
This unit has the units Software Engineering, Oriented Object Program and Web Technologies as antecedents. The
consequente units are Terminal Work I and II.
AIM OF THE LEARNING UNIT:
The student develops software systems for mobile devices through different platforms.
CREDITS HOURS
1.5
REVISED BY:
Dr. Flavio Arturo Snchez Garfias.
Subdireccin Acadmica
81
AUTHORIZED
BY:
Comisin
de
Programas Acadmicos del Consejo
General Consultivo del IPN
APPROVED BY:
Ing. Apolinar Francisco Cruz Lzaro.
Presidente del CTCE
PAGE:
OUT OF
10
THEMATIC UNIT: I
No.
1.1
1.2
1.2.1
1.2.2
1.2.3
1.2.4
1.2.5
1.2.6
1.2.7
1.3
1.3.1
1.3.2
1.3.3
1.3.4
1.4
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
0.5
1.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.5
1.5
0.5
0.5
3.5
1.0
0.5
0.5
6.0
3.0
0.5
Subtotals:
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
3.0
1.5
REFERENCES KEY
1B,2B,3B,4B
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This thematic unit must begin with a framing of the course and the formation of teams, will be Projects-Based learning
strategy, trough heuristic method, what will allow for the consolidation of the following learning techniques:
brainstorming, inquiry documentary, comparative tables, directed discussion, mental maps, project proposal (taking
into account the collection of requirements posed by the client), exhibition in team of supplementary issues and
implementation of practices.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Diagnostic Test
Project Portfolio:
Charts
Mind Maps
Cooperative Presentation
Proposal of project
Report of Practicals
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
Cooperative Evaluation
Written Learning Evidence
15%
10%
10%
5%
20%
5%
5%
30%
PAGE:
OUT OF
10
THEMATIC UNIT:II
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
T
2.1
2.1.1
2.1.2
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
1.5
0.5
0.5
1.0
1.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
REFERENCES KEY
P
1B,2B,5B,7C
1.5
1.5
Subtotals: 4.5
1.5
4.5
3.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
Will be Projects-Based learning strategy, trough heuristic method, what will allow for the consolidation of the following
learning techniques: brainstorming, inquiry documentary, comparative tables, directed discussion, comparative tables,
UML diagrams, exhibition in team of supplementary issues, advance of the project and practical and the production of
the learning evidences.
EVALUATION OF THE LEARNING
Project Portfolio:
Charts
UML diagrams
Advance of the Project
Cooperative Presentation
Report of Practicals
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
Cooperative Evaluation
Written Learning Evidence
10%
15%
5%
10%
20%
5%
5%
20%
PAGE:
OUT OF
10
THEMATIC UNIT:III
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
T
3.1
3.1.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
REFERENCES KEY
5%
10%
5%
20%
30%
5%
5%
20%
PAGE:
OUT OF
10
THEMATIC UNIT:IV
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
4.1
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
REFERENCES KEY
5%
15%
40%
10%
20%
5%
5%
PAGE:
THEMATIC UNIT: V
OUT OF
10
UNIT OF COMPETENCE
The student applies for best development practices based on the type of mobile application.
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
T
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.5
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
1.0
2.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
REFERENCES KEY
1B,2B,7C,12C
2.5
Subtotals: 3.5
0.5
5.5
2.5
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
Will be Projects-Based learning strategy, trough heuristic method, what will allow for the consolidation of the following
learning techniques: brainstorming, inquiry documentary, comparative tables, directed discussion, comparative tables,
UML diagrams, exhibition in team of supplementary issues, implementation of best practices in the project, and
practical and the production of the learning evidences
EVALUATION OF THE LEARNING
Project Portfolio:
Charts
Comparative Chart
Cooperative Presentation
Final project with best
practices integrated
Report of Practicals
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
Cooperative Evaluation
5%
15%
10%
40%
20%
5%
5%
PAGE:
OUT OF
10
RECORD OF PRACTICALS
No.
THEMATIC
UNITS
DURATION
4.5
II
4.5
Native Applications
III
9.0
IV
6.0
3.0
TOTAL OF
HOURS
27.0
ACCOMPLISHMENT
LOCATION
Computer Labs.
Continuous evaluation
Written learning evidence
EVALUATION TERMS
70%
30%
II
Continuous evaluation
Written learning evidence
80%
20%
III
Continuous evaluation
100%
IV y V
Continuous evaluation
100%
PAGE:
OF
10
KEY
Ballard B. (2009). Designing the Mobile User Experience. Inglaterra: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
ISBN 9780470033616
BFar R. (2005). Mobile computing principles. Inglaterra: Cambridge University Press. ISBN
9780521817332
Filing B. (2009). Mobile Design and Development. Estados Unidos de Amrica: OReilly. ISBN
978-0-596-15544-5
Mehta N. (2008). Mobile Web Development. Inglaterra: Pack Publishing. ISBN 9781847193438
ISBN
Mikkonen T. (2007). Programming Mobile Devices, Estados Unidos de Amrica: Wiley. ISBN
9780470057384
Moll C. (2008). Mobile Web Design. Estados Unidos de Amrica: Cameronmoll. ISBN
9780615185910
Piattini M., Garca F(2007). Calidad de Sistemas Informticos. Mxico Alfaomega. Mxico 2007.
388 pgs. ISBN 9789701512678
Pressman R(2005). Ingeniera del software: Un enfoque Prctico (8va. Ed.) Mxico: Mc Graw
Hill ISBN 9701054733.
10
Salmre I (2005). Writing Mobile Code: Essential Software Engineering for Building Mobile
Applications. Estados Unidos de Amrica: Addison-Wesley. ISBN 9780321269317
11
Sommerville I(2008). Ingeniera de Software (4ta. Ed.) Espaa: Addison Wesley. ISBN
9789702602064.
12
Golding P (2008). Next Generation Wireless Applications. Great Britain: John Wiley & Sons.
ISBN 978-0-470-72506-1.
ACADEMIC PROGRAM:
FORMATION AREA:
ACADEMY:
Institutional
Basic Scientific
Ingeniera de Software
LEARNING UNIT:
LEVEL
III
Professional
Terminal and
Integration
Unified
Modeling
Language
Software Engineering
Programming
Languages.
Web Technologies
English
Knowledge
of
the
Institutional
Educational Model.
PROFESSIONAL
EXPERIENCE
Two years in Analisys and
design Web Applications.
Two years handling Web
Technologies.
Two years in collaborative
work.
A year experience in the
Institutional
Educational
Model
ABILITIES
DESIGNED BY
Cooperative
Leadership
Fluidez verbal de ideas
Capacidad de traspasar
conocimientos
Manejo de estrategias
para
fomentar
el
aprendizaje autnomo
en el alumno
Manejo de estrategias
didcticas centradas en
el aprendizaje
Applications
of
Institutional Educational
Model.
REVISED BY
APTITUDES
Subdirector Acadmico
Responsible
Honest
Respectful
Tolerant
Assertiv
Collaborative
Participative
AUTHORIZED BY
COORDINATING PROFESOR
ACADEMIC PROGRAM:
LEARNING UNIT:
Cole, E. Krutz, R. Conley, J. (2009), Network Security Bible 2nd Edition, USA: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN:
978-0-470-50249-5.
Gmez, A. (2007), Enciclopedia de la Seguridad Informtica, Espaa: Alfa Omega. ISBN 9701512661
Long J. (2005), Google Hacking for Penetration Testers, USA: Syngress, ISBN: 1-931836-36-1
Mirkovic, J. Dietrich, S. Dittrich, D. Reiher, P. (2005), Internet Denial of Service: Attack and Defense
Mechanisms, USA: Prentice Hall. ISBN-13: 9780131475731
ACADEMIC AIM
This learning unit contributes to the profile of graduated of Ingeniera en Sistemas Computacionales, developing the skills
of abstraction, analysis and design of computer network security.
Design and Implementation of management systems for network security and monitoring using the architectures, protocols
and standards exist. It also develops strategic thinking, creative thinking, collaborative and participatory and assertive
communication.
Required of learning units Algoritmia y Programacin Estructurada, Sistemas Operativos, as como de Redes de
Computadoras, Aplicaciones para Comunicaciones en Red y Administracin de Servicios de Red.
AIM OF THE LEARNING UNIT:
The student develops computer networks security systems based on available infrastructure, connectivity devices, tools
and security policies.
CREDITS HOURS
1.5
REVISED BY:
Dr. Flavio Arturo Snchez Garfias.
Subdireccin Acadmica
81
APPROVED BY:
Ing. Apolinar Francisco Cruz Lzaro.
Presidente del CTCE
5%
5%
30%
5%
2.5% SECRETARA ACADMICA
2.5%
DIRECCIN DE EDUCACIN SUPERIOR
50%
LEARNING UNIT:
PAGE:
OUT OF
12
THEMATIC UNIT: I
No.
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
T
0.5
0.5
P
0.5
0.5
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.5
1.0
REFERENCES
KEY
P
2B, 5B
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.5
Subtotal:
2.5
1.0
6.5
2.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This unit will be addressed using learning strategy and project-oriented heuristics, enabling the consolidation of the
following learning techniques: documentary inquiry, guided discussion, case studies, problem solving, exhibition of
complementary topics and practical work.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Diagnostic Evaluation
Proyect Portfolio:
Evaluation of individual research
Research Worksheets
Report of practicals
Project Proposal
Self-assessment rubrics
Co-evaluation rubrics
Evidence of learning
PAGE:
OUT OF
12
THEMATIC UNIT: II
No.
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
T
1.0
1.0
Security strategies
Security policies
Security monitoring
Deployment mechanisms
Maintaining security
Security incident response
1.0
0.5
T
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
7.0
2.0
0.5
0.5
1.0
Subtotal:
3.5
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
REFERENCES
KEY
P
2B, 6B
1.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This unit will be addressed using learning strategy and project-oriented heuristics, enabling the consolidation of the
following learning techniques: documentary inquiry, guided discussion, case studies, problem solving, exhibition of
complementary topics and practical work.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Worksheets
Report of practicals
Project report (diagram and
equipment configuration)
Self-assessment rubrics
Co-evaluation rubrics
Evidence of learning
5%
25%
15%
2.5%
2.5%
50%
PAGE:
OUT OF
12
No.
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
Monitoring for network security
Monitoring for detection and its limitations
Applications for network monitoring
Operations for the security process in monitoring
Security architecture using firewalls
Security architecture using IDS
Security architecture using VPNs
Subtotal:
T
0.5
1.0
P
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.5
0.5
2.5
2.5
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
5.5
3.5
REFERENCES KEY
P
7B, 8B
1.5
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This unit will be addressed using learning strategy and project-oriented heuristics, enabling the consolidation of the
following learning techniques: documentary inquiry, guided discussion, case studies, problem solving, exhibition of
complementary topics and practical work.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Worksheets
Report of practicals
Project report (diagram and
equipment configuration)
Self-assessment rubrics
Co-evaluation rubrics
Evidence of learning
5%
20%
20%
2.5%
2.5%
50%
PAGE:
OUT OF
12
THEMATIC UNIT: IV
No.
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
Anatomy of intrusion attacks
Obtaining information about network to attack.
Determination of operating system
Determination of services
Discovering DNS
Mechanisms to detect an intrusion attack
Mechanisms to prevent intrusion attacks
T
0.5
P
0.5
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.5
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
1.0
1.0
0.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
REFERENCES
KEY
P
1B, 3C
1.0
0.5
1.0
0.5
1.5
3.0
6.5
3.0
Subtotal:
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This unit will be addressed using learning strategy and project-oriented heuristics, enabling the consolidation of the
following learning techniques: documentary inquiry, guided discussion, case studies, problem solving, exhibition of
complementary topics and practical work.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Worksheets
Report of practicals
Heading the project implementation
and progress
Self-assessment rubrics
Co-evaluation rubrics
Evidence of learning
5%
15%
25%
2.5%
2.5%
50%
PAGE:
OUT OF
12
THEMATIC UNIT: V
No.
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.6
5.7
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
T
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
Subtotal:
3.5
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
0.5
T
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
7.0
0.5
REFERENCES
KEY
P
4C, 10C
1.0
1.0
2.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This unit will be addressed using learning strategy and project-oriented heuristics, enabling the consolidation of the
following learning techniques: documentary inquiry, guided discussion, case studies, problem solving, exhibition of
complementary topics and practical work.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Worksheets
Report of practicals
Heading the project implementation
and progress
Self-assessment rubrics
Co-evaluation rubrics
Evidence of learning
5%
15%
25%
2.5%
2.5%
50%
LEARNING UNIT:
PAGE:
OUT OF
12
THEMATIC UNIT: VI
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
Types of data theft attacks
Anatomy of data theft attacks
Power Session Data
Packet Analysis
Attack detection mechanisms of information theft
Mechanisms to prevent data theft attack
Subtotals:
T
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
3.0
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
T
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.5
0.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
5.0
4.0
REFERENCES
KEY
P
13B, 12C
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This unit will be addressed using learning strategy and project-oriented heuristics, enabling the consolidation of the
following learning techniques: documentary inquiry, guided discussion, case studies, problem solving, exposure of
your project team and practical work.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Presenting the team final
Report of practicals
Report and project delivery
Self-assessment rubrics
Co-evaluation rubrics
Evidence of learning
15%
15%
35%
2.5%
2.5%
30%
PAGE:
OUT OF
12
RECORD OF PRACTICALS
No.
THEMATIC
UNITS
DURATION
1.5
DNS poisoning
1.5
Configure firewalls.
II
1.5
II
1.5
Configuring an IDS
III
3.0
III
3.0
IV
3.0
Setting up a honeypot
IV
3.0
Attack login
3.0
10
VI
1.5
11
VI
3.0
12
VI
1.5
TOTAL OF
HOURS
27.0
in Unit I.
in Unit II.
in Unit III.
in Unit IV, V and VI.
ACCOMPLISHMENT
LOCATION
Salas de cmputo de
escuela
la
PAGE:
PERIOD
UNIT
I y II
III y IV
VI
10
OUT OF
12
EVALUATION TERMS
The learning unit I and II are 30% worth of the final score
The learning unit III and IV are 30% worth of the final score
The learning unit V is 20% worth of the final score
The learning unit VI is 20% worth of the final score
Other means to pass this Learning Unit:
Evaluation of acknowledges previously acquired, with base in the issues
defined by the academy.
Official recognition by either another IPN Academic Unit of the IPN or by a
national or international external academic institution besides IPN.
If accredited by Special Assessment or a certificate of proficiency, this will be based
on guidelines established by the academy on a previous meeting for this purpose.
KEY
1
B
X
PAGE:
11
OUT OF
12
REFERENCES
Cole, E. (2002), Hackers Beware, USA: Sams Publishing, ISBN:
0735710090
Cole, E. Krutz, R. Conley, J. (2009), Network Security Bible 2nd Edition,
USA: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 978-0-470-50249-5.
Gregg, M. (2008), Build Your Own Security Lab: A Field Guide for Network
Testing, USA: John Wiley and Sons, ISBN: 0470179864
Gregg, M. (2006), Hack the Stack: Using Snort and Ethereal to Master the 8
Layers of an Insecure Network, USA: Syngress, ISBN: 1597491098
10
11
12
13
ACADEMIC PROGRAM:
FORMATION AREA:
ACADEMY:
Institutional
Sistemas Distribuidos.
Basic Scientific
LEARNING UNIT:
LEVEL
Professional
III
Terminal and
Integration
Architecture TCP / IP
Analysis of protocols
and programming
Computer Network
Security
Monitoring of
Computer Networks
PROFESSIONAL
EXPERIENCE
ABILITIES
Experience in
computer network
security
Experience using
applications for
Experience in safety
equipment
configuration: firewalls,
IDS and VPNs.
Experience managing
a programming
language
APTITUDES
Ability to communicate
well orally and in
writing.
Ability to review
software code and find
errors.
Easy management of
groups.
Management of
teaching methods
focused on learning
Architecture TCP / IP
Analysis of protocols and
programming
Computer Network
Security
Monitoring of Computer
Networks
DESIGNED BY
REVISED BY
AUTHORIZED BY
Date: 2011
NIVEL:
III
ACADEMIC AIM
This learning unit contributes to the profile of graduates of Computer Systems Engineer, developing the skills of
designing and developing applications for mobile devices to know the different platforms, development environments and
elements of applications for mobile devices attached to the standards of quality and extent of existing architectures.
Generic skills. Likewise, invigorate the powers of creative thinking, assertive communication, collaborative work.
It requires learning units as well as Software Engineering Object Oriented Programming the ability to program solutions
in a high-level language, Data Structure, the use of appropriate structures to manipulate data efficiently and
Technologies for developing Web applications on the Internet. Work units are consistent Trabajo Terminal I and Trabajo
Terminal II.
AIM OF THE LEARNING UNIT:
The student develops e-commerce applications based on security models, design and implementation of these systems.
CREDITS HOURS
REVISED BY:
54
81
AUTHORIZED BY:
Comisin de Programas Acadmicos
del Consejo General Consultivo del
IPN. 2011
_______________________________
Ing. Rodrigo de Jess Serrano
Domnguez
Secretario Tcnico de la Comisin
de Programas Acadmicos
e-Commerce
PAGE:
OUT OF
10
THEMATIC UNIT: I
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
T
1.1
1.2
1.2.1
1.2.2
1.2.3
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.7.1
1.7.2
0.5
0.5
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
REFERENCES KEY
1.0
1.0
1B,2B,3C,4B,5C
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.0
4.0
1.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.0
2.0
7.0
3.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This unit will address the strategy from project-oriented learning and heuristics, enabling the consolidation of the
following learning techniques: brainstorming, worksheets, inquiry documentary, directed discussion, concept mapping,
resolution problems, exposure to additional topics and team work experience.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Diagnostic Test
Proyect Portfolio:
Charts
5%
Technical data
5%
Exercise-solving
10%
Cooperative Presentation
10%
Report of Practicals
20%
Proyect proposal
10%
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
5%
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics 5%
Written Learning Evidence
30%
e-Commerce
PAGE:
OUT OF
10
THEMATIC UNIT: II
No.
CONTENTS
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
T
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
2.3.4
2.3.5
2.3.6
2.3.7
2.3.8
2.3.9
2.3.10
2.4
2.4.1
2.4.2
2.4.3
2.4.4
2.4.5
2.5
0.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
0.5
1.0
0.5
1.0
REFERENCES KEY
1B,2B,3C,4B,5C
1.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
0.5
0.5
1.0
Subtotals: 4.0
1.5
7.0
4.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This unit will be addressed from the project-oriented learning strategy and heuristics, enabling the consolidation of the
following learning techniques: inquiry document, worksheet, guided discussion, table of comparisons, computer
programs, exposure complementary team issues, project proposal and work experience.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Proyect Portfolio:
Charts
5%
Technical data
5%
Computer programs w/report 20%
Cooperative Presentation
10%
Report of Practicals
20%
Advance of Proyect
10%
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
5%
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics 5%
Written Learning Evidence
20%
e-Commerce
PAGE:
OUT OF
10
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
T
3.1
3.2
0.5
0.25
3.3
3.4
3.5
0.25
0.5
0.5
3.6
3.7
3.7.1
3.7.2
3.7.3
3.8
3.9
3.9.1
3.9.2
3.10
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.25
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
REFERENCES KEY
1.5
2B,3C,4B,5C
0.5
1.5
1.5
2.0
1.0
1.5
2.0
1.0
0.25
Subtotals: 4.0
1.5
7.0
4.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This unit will be addressed from the project-oriented learning strategy and heuristics, enabling the consolidation of the
following learning techniques: inquiry document, worksheet, guided discussion, table of comparisons, computer
program, exposure complementary team issues, project implementation and completion practices.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Proyect Portfolio:
Charts
5%
Technical data
5%
Computer programs w/report 20%
Cooperative Presentation
10%
Report of Practicals
20%
Advance ofProyect
30%
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
5%
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics 5%
LEARNING UNIT:
e-Commerce
PAGE:
OUT OF
10
THEMATIC UNIT: IV
No.
CONTENTS
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
T
4.1
0.5
4.2
0.5
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.6.1
4.6.2
4.6.3
Encryption methods
Certification schemes and digital signature
The electronic ID or eDNI
Security protocols on transactions:
PGP
SSL
SET
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.5
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
1.0
0.5
1.0
1.0
1.5
1.5
2.0
REFERENCES KEY
2B,3C,4B,5C
2.0
2.0
Subtotals: 4.0
1.5
7.0
4.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This unit will be addressed from the project-oriented learning strategy and heuristics, enabling the consolidation of the
following learning techniques: inquiry document, worksheet, guided discussion, table of comparisons, computer
program, exposure complementary team issues, project implementation and completion practices
LEARNING EVALUATION
Proyect Portfolio:
Charts
5%
Technical data
5%
Computer programs w/report 20%
Cooperative Presentation
10%
Report of Practicals
20%
Advance of Proyect
30%
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
5%
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics 5%
e-Commerce
PAGE:
OUT OF
10
THEMATIC UNIT: V
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
T
5.1
5.2
0.5
05
5.3
1.0
5.4
5.5
0.5
1.0
5.6
0.5
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
0.5
0.5
1.5
REFERENCES KEY
2B,5C
3.0
1.5
1.5
0.5
1.0
2.0
Subtotals: 4.0
1.0
6.0
5.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This unit will be addressed from the project-oriented learning strategy and heuristics, enabling the consolidation of the
following learning techniques: inquiry document, worksheet, guided discussion, table of comparisons, computer
program, exposure complementary team issues, project implementation and completion practices.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Proyect Portfolio:
Charts
5%
Technical data
5%
Computer programs w/report 20%
Cooperative Presentation
10%
Report of Practicals
20%
Proyect report
30%
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
5%
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics 5%
e-Commerce
PAGE:
OUT OF
RECORD OF PRACTICALS
No.
THEMATIC
UNITS
DURATION
4.5
II
5.5
III
5.5
4.
IV
5.5
6.0
TOTAL OF
HOURS
27.0
ACCOMPLISHMENT
LOCATION
Computer Labs.
10
LEARNING UNIT:
PERIOD
1
PAGE:
UNIT
I
EVALUATION TERMS
Continuous evaluation 70% and written learning evidence 30%
II
III
IV y V
OUT OF
10
KEY
1
C
X
REFERENCES
Chaffey, D. E-Business and E-Commerce Management: Strategy,
Implementation and Practice. (4th Edition). United States of America:
Prentice Hall. ISBN: 9780273719601.
De Reynools, J. (2009). The Complete e-Commerce Book. United States
of America: Ed. Elsevier Science Ltd. ISBN-13: 9781578203123.
FORMATION AREA:
ACADEMY:
III
NIVEL
Institutional
Basic Scientific
Ingeniera de Software
Professional
LEARNING UNIT:
Terminal and
Integration
e-Commerce
Programming
languages.
Web Technologies.
Software Engineering.
Databases
Web Site
Administration
English language
PROFESSIONAL
EXPERIENCE
A year in web programming
Actual in educational as
facilitator of the knowledge
of six months.
Six months in the handling
of equipment of calculation.
A year experience in the
Institutional Educational
Model.
ABILITIES
APTITUDES
Analysis and
synthesis.
Problems resolution.
Cooperative.
Leadership.
Applications of
Institutional
Educational Model.
Decision making.
Responsible.
Tolerant.
Honest.
Respectful.
Collaborative.
Participative.
Interested to
learning.
Assertive.
DESIGNED BY
REVISED BY
AUTHORIZED BY
2011
ACADEMIC PROGRAM:
LEARNING UNIT:
LEVEL: III
Bovet, D. Cesati, M. (2000) Understanding the Linux Kernel. (3 Ed.) EUA: Ed. O'Reilly. ISBN: 0-59600002-2
Hallinan, C. (2006) Embedded Linux Primer. EUA: Ed. Prentice Hall. ISBN: 978-0-13-167984-9
Kroah-Hartman, G. (2006) Linux Kernel in a Nutshell. EUA: Ed. O'Reilly. ISBN: 978-0-596-10079-7
Love, R. (2003) Linux Kernel Development. ( 2a Ed.) EUA: Ed. Novell Press. ISBN: 978-0672327209
Nutt, G. (2000) Kernel Projects for Linux. EUA: Ed. Addison Wesley. ISBN: 978-0201612431
ACADEMICAIM
This learning unit contributes to the profile of the Engineer in Computer Systems by developing skills as well as creative
thinking and programming system software that make optimal use of resources.
It also encourages self learning ability, along with participatory and collaborative attitudes in problem solving and project
planning working groups.
This unit has the units Algorithm and Structured Programming, Data Structures and Operating Systems as antecedents.
The consequent units are Terminal Work I and II.
AIMOF THE LEARNING UNIT:
The student restructures the LINUX operating system kernel, based on their analysis and redesign techniques.
CREDITS HOURS
1.5
AUTHORIZED
BY:
Comisin
de
Programas Acadmicos del Consejo
General Consultivo del IPN
REVISED BY:
Dr. Flavio Arturo Snchez Garfias.
Subdireccin Acadmica
APPROVED BY:
Ing. Apolinar Francisco Cruz Lzaro.
Presidente del CTCE
PAGE:
OUT OF
11
THEMATIC UNIT:I
TITLE:Introduction
UNIT OF COMPETENCE
The student carries out the compilation of the Linux operating system kernel, based on the configuration and
compilation procedures.
No.
1.1
1.2
1.2.1
1.2.2
1.3
1.3.1
1.3.2
1.3.3
1.3.4
1.4
1.4.1
1.4.2
1.4.3
1.4.4
1.5
1.5.1
1.5.2
1.5.3
1.5.4
1.6
1.6.1
1.6.2
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
History of LINUX.
General architecture of the core.
Core structure.
Supervisor mode and user mode.
Construction of the core.
Tools for the kernel.
Download the source code.
Tool chain.
Tools to use.
Configuration and compilation.
Installing and running the core.
Kernel upgrade.
Customizing the kernel.
Installing device drivers.
System Calls.
Transfer control.
Service routines.
Passing parameters.
Signal and interrupts.
Static and dynamic binding.
Symbol tables.
Modules.
Subtotals:
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
0.5
0.5
T
2.0
0.5
1.5
0.5
2.0
1.0
1.0
0.5
2.0
1.0
1.0
0.5
1.5
2.5
0.5
0.5
2.5
1.0
5.0
2.5
9.5
8.0
REFERENCES
KEY
P
2.5
2B,7B,6C,5C
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This Thematic Unit must begin with a framing of the course and the formation of teams. In this unit mainly used the
strategy of collaborative learning, and heuristic teaching method. The main techniques used are brainstorming,
discussion groups, cells of learning, concept maps, structured problem solving, practical work, and analysis and
research in teams.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Diagnostic Test
Project Portfolio:
Worksheet
5%
Research team
20%
Report of Practices
15%
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
5%
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics5%
Team Project35%
Written Learning Evidence
15%
PAGE:
OUT OF
11
THEMATIC UNIT:II
No.
2.1
2.2
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.6.1
2.6.2
2.6.3
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.10
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
Memory Management.
Paging and virtual memory.
3-page table levels.
Page frame.
Paging algorithms.
General-purpose cache.
Swapping and page cache.
Virtual memory management.
Process Management.
Structure to manage the processes.
Process list.
The file system / proc.
Kernel threads.
Creating processes and associated resources.
Context switch.
Scheduling processes.
Subtotals:
T
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
P
0.5
T
3.0
P
2.5
REFERENCES
KEY
2B, 7B, 6C
1.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
5.0
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
2.5
2.5
1.5
1.0
8.5
5.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
In this unit mainly to be used the strategy of collaborative learning, and heuristic teaching method. The main
techniques used are: brainstorming, discussion groups, cells of learning, concept maps, structured problem solving,
practical work, and analysis and research teams in groups. It must develop a team project for the thematic unit, or a
single project for the learning unit to incorporate elements of each topic.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Worksheet
5%
Research team
20%
Report of Practices
15%
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
5%
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics 5%
Team Project
35%
Written Learning Evidence
15%
PAGE:
OUT OF
11
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
T
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
Interrupt handling.
Upper half and lower half.
Using the tasklet.
Clocks in Linux.
RTC, the CPU cycle counter, the core clock.
Timer interrupts.
Soft IRQ.
Disabling interrupts.
Spin lock.
Kernel semaphores.
P
0.5
4.0
T
1.5
P
2.5
REFERENCES KEY
2B, 7B, 6C
1.5
0.5
0.5
1.0
Subtotals:
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
2.0
0.5
5.0
2.5
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
In this unit mainly to be used the strategy of collaborative learning, and heuristic teaching method. The main techniques
used are: brainstorming, discussion groups, cells of learning, concept maps, structured problem solving, practical work,
and analysis and research teams in groups. It must develop a team project for the thematic unit, or a single project for
the learning unit to incorporate elements of each topic.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Worksheet
Research team
Report of Practices
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics
Team Project
Written Learning Evidence
5%
20%
15%
5%
5%
35%
15%
PAGE:
OUT OF
11
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
Device driver.
DMA.
Character devices, block and network.
Special device file.
Device registration.
LINUX file systems.
File systems.
VFS virtual file systems.
LVM and RAID.
JFS.
Subtotals:
T
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
P
0.5
3.5
1.0
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
1.5
P
2.5
REFERENCES
KEY
2B,7B,3C
1.5
0.5
1.0
1.5
4.5
3.5
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
In this unit mainly to be used the strategy of collaborative learning, and heuristic teaching method. The main
techniques used are: brainstorming, discussion groups, cells of learning, concept maps, structured problem solving,
practical work, and analysis and research teams in groups. It must develop a team project for the thematic unit, or a
single project for the learning unit to incorporate elements of each topic.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Worksheet
Research team
Report of Practices
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics
Team Project
Written Learning Evidence
5%
20%
15%
5%
5%
35%
15%
PAGE:
OUT OF
11
THEMATIC UNIT: V
TITLE:Embedded Linux
UNIT OF COMPETENCE
The student implements an embedded system based on design strategies and the source code for Linux.
No.
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
Architecture of an embedded system.
Development process of embedded systems.
Boot loaders.
Development tools.
Real time.
Subtotals:
T
1.5
P
0.5
1.0
1.0
0.5
4.0
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
2.5
P
2.5
REFERENCES
KEY
4C
2.5
0.5
5.0
2.5
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
In this unit mainly to be used the strategy of collaborative learning, and heuristic teaching method. The main
techniques used are: brainstorming, discussion groups, cells of learning, concept maps, structured problem solving,
practical work, and analysis and research teams in groups. It must develop a team project for the thematic unit, or a
single project for the learning unit to incorporate elements of each topic.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Worksheet
Research team
Report of Practices
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics
Team Project
Written Learning Evidence
5%
20%
15%
5%
5%
35%
15%
PAGE:
OUT OF
RECORD OF PRACTICALS
No.
NAME OF THEPRACTICAL
THEMATIC
UNITS
DURATION
3.0
Optimization
installation.
driver
1.5
1.5
Construction of a module.
3.0
1.5
II
3.0
II
3.0
Implementing timers.
III
3.0
IV
3.0
10
IV
1.5
11
Embedded Linux.
3.0
TOTAL OF
HOURS
27.0
of
kernel
and
ACCOMPLISHMENT
LOCATION
Computer Labs.
11
PAGE:
PERIOD
1
UNIT
I
EVALUATION TERMS
Continuous evaluation 85% and written learning evidence 15%
II
III
IV
OUT OF
11
KEY
1
C
X
PAGE:
10
OUT OF
11
REFERENCES
Benvenuti, C. (2005).Understanding Linux Network Internals. EUA: Ed.
O'Reilly Media.ISBN: 978-0596002558.
Bovet, D. Cesati,M. (2000) Understanding the Linux Kernel. (3 Ed.). EUA:
Ed. O'Reilly. ISBN: 0-596-00002-2.
Nutt, G. (2000).Kernel Projects for Linux. EUA: Ed. Addison Wesley. ISBN:
978-0201612431.
Sistemas Distribuidos.
Basic Scientific
LEARNING UNIT:
LEVEL
Professional
III
Terminal and
Integration
Computer
networks and
networked
applications.
Handling of the
Operating
Systems.
Programming
Languages C and
assembler.
UNIX Systems
Programming.
Knowledge of the
Institutional
Educational
Model.
English.
PROFESSIONAL
EXPERIENCE
ABILITIES
Experience a year
in Linux
application
programming.
Two years
experience in
handling groups
and collaborative
work.
Experience of one
year as Professor
of Higher
Education.
Analysis and
synthesis.
Leadership.
Decision making.
Conflict
Management.
Group
management.
Verbal fluency of
ideas.
Teaching skills.
APTITUDES
Responsible.
Tolerant.
Honest.
Respectful.
Collaborative.
Participative.
Interested to learning.
Assertive.
DESIGNED BY
REVISED BY
AUTHORIZED BY
Date: 2011
ACADEMIC PROGRAM:
LEARNING UNIT:
Intelligent Systems
LEVEL: III
Jennings, N.R. Wooldridge, M.J. (2002). Agent Technology Foundations, Applications and Markets.
Alemania: Springer-Verlaga. ISBN: ISBN 3-540-63591-2
Weiss, G.(1999). Multiagent Systems: A Modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. USA: The
MIT Press, Pearson Education. ISBN: 978-0-262-73131-7
Wooldridge, M.(2009). An Introduction to MultiAgent System. (Second Edition) UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
ISBN: 978-0470519462
LEVEL: III
MODALITY: Presencial
ACADEMIC AIM
Furthermore, this program to provide the knowledge to design intelligent systems, being caused the independent
learning by means of the use of tools and methods; developing abilities to use different agent architectures and MultiAgent System Development Platformsfor implements multi-agent system. It contributes to the debit profile reinforcing it
integration of the knowledge of other Units of Learning to plan, to negotiate and to foment the analysis skills; designing
and coordinating projects in the context of intelligent systems and agent technology. It dominates the practical and
methodological principles, aspects for the construction of systems. Decision making, solution of problems, assertive
communication, and creative, strategic thought. This unit has the units Distributed Systems and Artificial Intelligence as
antecedents.
AIM OF THE LEARNING UNIT:
Designs a Multi-Agent System through FIPA reference model for Agent Systems.
CREDITS HOURS
THEORETICAL CREDITS/WEEK:3.0
PRACTICAL CREDITS/WEEK:1.5
REVISED BY:
THEORETICAL
HOURS/SEMESTER:54
PRACTICAL HOURS/SEMESTER:27
AUTHORIZEDBY:
Comisin
de
Programas Acadmicos del Consejo
General Consultivo del IPN. 2011
_______________________________
Ing. Rodrigo de Jess Serrano
Domnguez
Secretario Tcnico de la Comisin
de Programas Acadmicos
Intelligent Systems
PAGE:
OUT OF
THEMATIC UNIT: I
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
1.1
1.1.1
1.1.2
1.1.3
Introduction
Distributed Artificial Intelligence
Fundamentos de agencia
Applications: industries, marketing and medical.
0.5
1.2
12.1
1.2.2
1.2.3
1.2.4
Agent Theory
Agents and Objects
Agents and Expert Systems
Agents as Intentional Systems
Abstract Architectures for Intelligent Agents
2.5
0.5
3.0
3.5
1.3
1.3.1
1.3.2
1.3.3
Taxonomies of Agents
Reactive Agents
Deductive Agents
Hybrid Agents
2.0
1.0
3.0
3.5
5.0
1.5
7.5
7.0
Subtotals:
REFERENCES KEY
1.5
6B, 2C, 5C
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This Thematic Unit must begin with a framing of the course and the formation of teams. Will be Projects-Based learning
strategy, trough analogical method, with the techniques of elaboration of charts, concept mapping, exhibition in team,
practical and production of learning evidence and the accomplishment of a project proposal.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Report of Practicals
Tab work
Concept Map
Cooperative Presentation
Project proposal
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics
Writing Learning Evidence
10%
5%
5%
10%
30%
5%
5%
30%
Intelligent Systems
PAGE:
OUT OF
THEMATIC UNIT: II
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
2.1
2.1.1
2.1.2
2.1.3
Architectures
Blackboard Architecture
BDI Architecture
Multiagent Systems
2.5
0.5
2.5
2.0
2.2
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.2.4
Communications
Speech Acts
Lenguages: KQML, ACL
Interaction Protocols: Contract Net
Ontologies
2.5
0.5
2.5
2.5
0.5
2.5
2.5
2.3
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
2.3.4
REFERENCES KEY
Subtotals: 5.0
1.5
7.5
7.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
Will be projects-Based learning strategy, trough analogical method,trough analogical method, with the techniques of
elaboration of charts, concept mapping, exhibition in team, advance of the project, practical and production of learning
evidences.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Report of Practicals
Concept Mapping
Cooperative Presentation
Advance of the Project
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics
Writing Learning Evidence
10%
5%
5%
30%
5%
5%
40%
Intelligent Systems
PAGE:
OUT OF
No.
Teacherledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
3.1
0.5
1.0
3.2
AAII Methodology
0.5
1.0
3.3
3.3.1
3.3.2
3.3.3
3.3.4
GAIA
a) Agent Model
b) The Services Model
c) Interaction Model
d) Acquaintance Model
1.0
3.0
3.4
JADE y JADEX
1.0
1.0
3.5
TROPOS
0.5
0.5
3.6
PROMETHEUS
0.5
0.5
3.7
Agent UML
0.5
1.0
3.8
Agent Z
REFERENCES KEY
P
3B, 7B
0.5
1.0
Subtotals: 5.0
0.0
9.0
0.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
Will be projects-Based learning strategy, trough analogical method,trough analogical method, with the techniques of
elaboration of charts, concept mapping, exhibition in team, advance of the project, practical and production of learning
evidences.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Concept Mapping
Tab work
Advance of theProject
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics
Writing Learning Evidence
5%
5%
40%
5%
5%
40%
Intelligent Systems
PAGE:
OUT OF
THEMATIC UNIT: IV
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
3.0
1.5
3.5
3.0
3.0
1.5
5.5
4.0
Subtotals: 6.0
3.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
9.0
7.0
4.1
4.1.1
4.1.2
4.1.3
4.1.4
4.2
4.2.1
4.2.2
4.2.3
4.2.4
4.2.5
JADE
Introduction
Architecture
Threaded behaviours
Interaction protocols
Ontologies and content languages
REFERENCES KEY
1B, 4C, 7B
Techniques of elaboration of exercise-solving, cooperative presentation, practical and learning evidence, the
production of the learning evidences andthe presentation of the final project.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Report of Practical
Exercise-solving
Concept Mapping
Final Project
Self-Evaluation Rubric
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics
Writing Learning Evidence
10%
5%
5%
50%
5%
5%
20%
LEARNING UNIT:
Intelligent System
PAGE:
OUT OF
RECORD OF PRACTICALS
No.
THEMATIC
UNITS
DURATION
Deductive Agents
2.5
Reactive Agents
3.5
Hybrid Agents
2.5
Ontologies
II
2.0
Contract Net
II
3.0
Blackboard Systems
II
3.5
JADE Instalation
IV
2.0
JADE behaviours
IV
2.0
JADE Protocols
IV
3.0
10
IV
3.0
TOTAL OF
HOURS
27.0
ACCOMPLISHMENT
LOCATION
Computers Labs
Intelligent Systems
PERIOD
1
UNIT
I
PAGE:
Continuous evaluation
Written Learning Evidence
EVALUATION TERMS
70%
30%
II
Continuous evaluation
Written Learning Evidence
60%
40%
III
Continuous evaluation
Written Learning Evidence
60%
40%
IV
Continuous evaluation
Written Learning Evidence
80%
20%
OUT OF
KEY
1
B
X
REFERNCES
Belligemine, F. Caire, G. Greenwood, D.(2007). Developing multi-agents
Systems with JADE. USA: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. ISBN: 9780470057476
Institutional
LEVEL
Basic Scientific
Software Engineering
Professional
LEARNING UNIT:
III
Terminal and
Integration
Intelligent Systems .
PROFESSIONAL
EXPERIENCE
A year designs
computational systems
A year experience develop
expert systems
Two Years working in
groups and work
collaborative.
A year experience in the
Institutional Educational
Model.
DESIGNED BY
ABILITIES
APTITUDES
REVISED BY
Responsible.
Honest.
Respectful.
Tolerant.
Assertive.
Colaborative.
Participative.
AUTHORIZED BY
2011
ACADEMIC PROGRAM:
LEARNING UNIT:
LEVEL: III
Technological innovation
The strategy of technological innovation
Strategic technological cooperation
The technology transfer process.
Strategies of protection and development of technology
New products: conception, marketing and commercialization
TEACHING PRINCIPLES:
The unit of learning will govern from the strategy learning faced to projects. The skills that will help the chosen
strategy are: rain of ideas, graphic organizers, documentary investigation, collaborated work, guided discussions,
exhibition of topics, practices of laboratory and the achievement of a project of technological innovation. The
methods of education that will be implemented are inductive and deductive.
EVALUATION AND PASSING REQUIREMENTS:
The present Unit of Learning will be evaluated from the structure of the project of technological innovation and of the
briefcase of evidences, which is content of: diagnostic, formative and added assessment. The instruments of
evaluation that will be applied are: lists of collation, guides of observation and rubrics. The added evaluation will
consider the application of an evidence of learning written for the first and second period of evaluation and for the
third period, the structure of the project of technological innovation with viability of being an object of technological
transference.
Other means to pass this Unit of Learning:
Evaluation of acknowledges previously acquired, with base in the issues defined by the academy.
Official recognition by either another IPN Academic Unit of the IPN or by a national or international external
academic institution besides IPN.
REFERENCES:
Aggestam Maria (2008), Management Practices in High-Tech Environments. United Kingdom IGI Global.
ISBN 9781599045641.
Folz J. (2008) Management Practices in High-Tech Environments. United States of America: IGI Global.
ISBN 9781599045641.
Kenney, M. (2000). Understanding Silicon Valley: the anatomy of an entrepreneurial region. United States
of America: Stanford Business Books. ISBN 0804737339.
Morcillo Ortega, P. (2007) Direccin Estratgica de la Tecnologa e Innovacin: un enfoque de
competencias. Spain: Civitas. ISBN: 8447009106
Russo D., Bleier R. (2010), 17 Rules Successful Companies Use to Attract and Keep Top Talent: Why
Engaged Employees Are Your Greatest Sustainable Advantage. United States of America: Pearson ISBN:
97-8848-322-347-5
ACADEMIC AIM
This unit of learning contributes to the profile of graduation of the Computational Systems Engineer, by means of the
development of competences of technological innovation sustained in the technology as cooperative strategic variable,
transference of technology, strategies of protection, development, marketing and commercialization. The generic
competences that are intensify are the work in team, the critical thought for the creation and project management of high
technology, as well as the application of systemic solutions in complex problems, design and the management of the
innovation in the organization.
It needs from the units of learning Software Engineering, Quantitative Methods for the Capture of Decisions, Administrative
Management, and Management Project.
AIM OF THE LEARNING UNIT:
The student builds a project of technological innovation, based on technological transfer processes.
CREDITS HOURS
THEORETICAL CREDITS / WEEK: 3.0
PRACTICAL CREDITS / WEEK:
1.5
REVISED BY:
Dr. Flavio Arturo Snchez Garfias.
Subdireccin Acadmica
AUTHORIZED
BY:
Comisin
de
Programas Acadmicos del Consejo
General Consultivo del IPN
81
APPROVED BY:
Ing. Apolinar Francisco Cruz Lzaro.
Presidente del CTCE
PAGE:
OUT OF
11
N THEMATIC UNIT: I
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
The conceptual frame of the technological innovation
The concept of innovation and the terminology of the
R+D (Research and development)
Some definitions of innovation
Basic investigation, applied investigation and
technological development (R+D)
The innovative process
The lineal model
The model Marquis
The model of the London Business School
The model of Kline
The innovation as source of competitiveness
The process of technological innovation in the
organization
The management of the technological knowledge
The characteristics of the environment: the
technological change
The strategy as response to the evolution of the
competitive environment
The technology and the structure of the market
Subtotals:
T
0.5
0.5
1.0
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
1.0
P
0.5
0.5
1.0
1.0
REFERENCES
KEY
1C,2B,3B,4C
1.0
0.5
0.5
1.0
2.0
1.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
3.0
1.5
6.0
3.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
Framing of the course and formation of teams.
The present unit will be tackled from the strategy of learning faced to projects of technological innovation, the skills of
learning: rain of ideas, card of work, documentary investigation, guided discussion, conceptual maps, resolution of
problems, and exhibition in team of complementary topics and achievement of practices. The method of education that
will be implemented is the deductive one.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Diagnostic Test
Project Portfolio:
Card of work
5%
Conceptual map
5%
Exercises
10%
Team Presentation
10%
Report of practice
20%
Self evaluation Rubrics
5%
Co evaluation Rubric
5%
Evidence of learning
40%
PAGE:
OF
11
N THEMATIC UNIT: II
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
The definition of technological strategy
The technology as strategic variable
The making of the technological strategy
Tools for the strategic reflection
The counterfoil technologies - products
The counterfoil ADL and the strategies
The technological dual tree
The counterfoil technological attraction technological
position
The systematical exploration of applications in other
sectors: " the bunches or technological "trees"
The essential capacities (core competences)
The briefcase of technologies
The process of managing the technology: the strategic
plan of the technological development.
Subtotals:
T
0.5
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
1.5
P
0.5
1.5
0.5
REFERENCES
KEY
1C,2B,4B,5C
2.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.5
1.0
0.5
3.0
1.0
1.5
1.5
6.0
3.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
The present unit will tackle from the strategy learning faced to practical cases and the technological innovation, skills of
learning will be applied: documentary investigation, card of work, guided discussion, picture of comparisons, programs
of calculation, exhibition in team of complementary topics, proposal of the project and achievement of practices. The
methods of education that will implement are the inductive and deductive.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Assessment
Project Portfolio:
Card of work
5%
Conceptual map
5%
Exercises
10%
Team Presentations
10%
Report of practice
20%
Self evaluation Rubrics
5%
Co evaluation Rubric
5%
Evidence of learning
40%
LEARNING UNIT:
PAGE:
OF
11
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
The strategic cooperation in growth.
The principal forms of cooperation.
The motivations of the strategies of cooperation.
The cooperation between different agents in the
development and absorption of technology.
Technologies for the technological cooperation.
Networks, clusters and networking.
The Start-Ups and the joint ventures.
Success or defeat of the agreements of cooperation.
Subtotals:
T
0.5
1.0
0.5
0.5
1.0
3.0
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
1.0
1.5
P
0.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
REFERENCES
KEY
1C,2B,3B,4C
1.0
0.5
0.5
1.5
0.5
1.5
6.0
3.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
The present unit will tackle from the strategy learning faced to projects and the strategic technological cooperation,
which will allow the consolidation of the following skills of learning: documentary investigation, card of work, guided
discussion, picture of comparisons, program of calculation, exhibition in team of complementary topics, implementation
of the project and achievement of practices. The methods of education that will implement inductive and deductive.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Assessment
Project Portfolio:
Card of work
5%
Table of Comparisons
5%
Projects with reports
20%
Team Presentations
10%
Advance of the project
30%
Report of practice
20%
Self evaluation Rubric
5%
Co evaluation Rubric
5%
PAGE:
OF
11
N THEMATIC UNIT: IV
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
Transference of the technology: forms and strategies.
The forms of the transference of technology.
Motivations of the buyers and of the sellers of
technology.
Strategies of transference of technology.
Analysis of the process of transference of technology.
The market of the technology.
The product.
The distribution channels.
The price.
The contract of transference of technology.
Legal frame.
Content of the contracts.
Some specific contracts.
Optimization of the process of transference of
technology
Strategies of transference of technology.
Elements of support to the transference of technology.
Subtotals:
T
0.5
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
0.5
REFERENCES
KEY
P
1C,2B,4B,3C
1.0
1.0
0.5
0.5
1.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.5
0.5
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
3.0
1.5
1.5
6.0
3.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
The present unit will be tackled from the strategy of learning faced to projects and the technological transference, which
will allow the consolidation of the following skills of learning: documentary investigation, card of work, guided
discussion, picture of comparisons, program of calculation, exhibition in team of complementary topics, implementation
of the project and achievement of practices. The methods of education that will implement inductive and deductive
LEARNING EVALUATION
Assessment
Project Portfolio:
Card of work
5%
Table of Comparisons
5%
Team Presentations
20%
Exhibition in team
10%
Advance of the project
30%
Report of practice
20%
Self evaluation Rubric
5%
Co evaluation Rubric
5%
LEARNING UNIT:
PAGE:
OF
11
N THEMATIC UNIT: V
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
The need to protect the innovations.
The principal instruments.
Industrial property and intellectual property.
The protection of the inventions (patents and models of
utility).
The patents of invention.
The ways to patent.
The models of utility.
The Industrial design (Models and industrial drawings).
The distinctive signs (marks and trade names).
The mark.
The trade names.
The European or community mark.
Management of the intellectual property in the
organizations
Subtotals:
T
0.5
1.0
0.5
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
1.0
REFERENCES
KEY
P
1C,3B,4B,6B
1.5
0.5
0.5
1.5
1.0
0.5
1.0
0.5
1.0
1.0
0.5
3.0
1.0
1.5
6.0
3.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
The present unit will tackle from the strategy learning faced to practical cases and strategies of protection and
development of the technology, which will allow the consolidation of the following skills of learning: documentary
investigation, card of work, guided discussion, picture of comparisons, program of calculation, exhibition in team of
complementary topics, implementation of the project and achievement of practices. The methods of education that will
implement inductive and deductive.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Assessment
Project Portfolio:
Card of work
5%
Table of Comparisons
5%
Projects with reports
20%
Exhibition in team
10%
Advance of the project
30%
Report of practice
20%
Self evaluation Rubric
5%
Co evaluation Rubric
5%
LEARNING UNIT:
PAGE:
OF
11
N THEMATIC UNIT: VI
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
Introduction: new products, the vision from the
marketing.
Concept and position.
Concept and test of the concept.
Position and strategies of marketing.
Three tools for the conception of the products.
The deployment of the quality function (QDF).
The analysis of the value.
The resolution of inventive problems (TRIZ).
The process of development.
The design.
The plan of marketing and the throwing.
The plan of marketing.
The test of marketing.
The throwing.
Success and defeat of the new products.
Results of the investigation on the new products.
The importance of the complementary resources.
A new paradigm for the development of new products
Subtotals:
T
0.5
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
1.5
REFERENCES
KEY
P
1C,2B,3B,5C
0.5
0.5
1.5
0.5
0.5
0.50
1.5
0.5
0.5
1.5
0.5
3.0
0.50
2.0
0.50
3.0
1.5
6.0
3.0
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
The present unit will tackle from the strategy learning faced to projects, conception, marketing and commercialization,
applying the skills of learning: documentary investigation, card of work, guided discussion, picture of comparisons,
program of calculation, exhibition in team of complementary topics, implementation of the project and achievement of
practices. The methods of education that will implement inductive and deductive.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Card of work
Table of Comparisons
Projects with reports
Exhibition in team
Implementation of the project
Report of practice
Self evaluation Rubric
Co evaluation Rubric
5%
5%
20%
10%
30%
20%
5%
5%
PAGE:
OF
11
RECORD OF PRACTICALS
THEMATIC
UNITS
DURATION
3.0
1.5
II
1.5
II
3.0
III
1.5
III
3.0
IV
1.5
IV
3.0
1.5
10
3.0
11
VI
3.0
12
VI
1.5
TOTAL OF
HOURS
27.0
PRACTICAL No.
ACCOMPLISHMENT
LOCATION
Computer Labs.
PERIOD
1
UNIT
I, II
2
3
PAGE:
Continuous assessment
Evidence of learning
EVALUATION TERMS
60%
40%
III, IV
Continuous assessment
100%
V, VI
Continuous assessment
100%
10
OF
11
The Learning Units I and II is 30% worth of the total of the final evaluation
The Learning Units Unit III and IV is 30% worth of the total of the final evaluation
The Learning Units Unit V and VI is 40% worth of the total of the final evaluation
In case of accreditation this Unit of Learning for Extraordinary Assessment or
Sufficiency Assessment, this one will consist of a practical part that it will contribute
50% of the grade and a theoretical part that it will contribute 50% remaining, with base
in the lineaments established by the Academy.
Other means to pass this Learning Unit:
Evaluation of acknowledges previously acquired, with base in the issues
defined by the academy.
Official recognition by either another IPN Academic Unit of the IPN or by a
national or international external academic institution besides IPN.
KEY
1
C
X
REFERENCES
Aggestam Maria (2008), Management Practices in High-Tech
Environments. United Kingdom IGI Global. ISBN 9781599045641
ACADEMIC PROGRAM:
FORMATION AREA:
ACADEMY:
Institutional
Basic Scientific
LEVEL
Professional
III
Terminal and
Integration
Management of
Resources.
Skills of Management
of the Knowledge.
Tools of analysis for
the capture of
decisions.
Intellectual Property.
Marketing.
Strategic
Administration.
English Language
PROFESSIONAL
EXPERIENCE
Experience of one
year in administrative
area.
Experience of two
years in the handling
of groups and in the
team job.
Experience of one
year as Teacher of
Top Level.
ABILITIES
APTITUDES
Analysis
and
synthesis.
Leadership.
Capture of decisions.
Handling of Conflicts.
Handling of groups.
Verbal
Fluency
of
ideas.
Didactic Skills.
Collaborating.
To take part in a team.
Person in charge.
Honest.
Respectful.
Tolerant.
Assertive.
DESIGNED BY
REVISED BY
AUTHORIZED BY
Date: 2011
Synthetic Plan
Academic Site: Escuela Superior de Comercio y Administracion Unidad Santo Tomas Escuela
Superior de Comercio y Administracion Unidad Tepepan
Academic Plan: Public Accountant
Learning Unit: Fundamentals of Finance
Level: II
General Aim:
Assess the financial information of the items comprising the assets of the balance sheet based on to
financial tools to make decisions about the proper management of the investments in the economic entity
through solving a practical case.
Contents:
Introduction to finance
Working Capital
Permanent investments
Other assets
Teaching orientation:
In terms of teaching strategies the teacher will be responsible for working patterns noted for handling learning unit.
They implement the following strategies: text analysis and documentary research in various media as well as concept
mapping, synoptic charts, analysis and resolution of practical cases that fundaments making decisions.
Bibliography:
Besley, Scott y Brigham, Eugene. Fundamentos de admi nistracin financiera . Editorial Me
Graw Hill
Mxico
2008 pgs. 819 ISBN 0-03-025872-3
Brealey, Myers, Marcus
Fundamentos de finanzas corporat ivas . Editorial Me Graw Hill 5. Edicin
Mxico
2007 792 pgs. ISBN 84-481-4195-4
Moreno Fernndez Joaqun A. Las finanzas en la empresa. Editorial CECSA IMCP. Primera Edicin
Mxico 2005 pgs.677
ISBN 970-24-0231-X
Ortega Castro, Alfons o Introduccin a las finanzas. Editorial Me Graw Hill Mxico 2008
402
pgs. ISBN 970-10-3824-X
Block, Stanley B. Foundations of financia! management. Ed. Me Graw-Hill. Thirteen editon. USA.
2000 pp 665. ISBN 978-0-07-128525-4
General Purpose
Evaluate the financial information of the items comprising the assets of the balance sheet based on the
financial tools to make decisions about the proper management of investments in economic entities
through the resolution of a practical integrator.
Page:
of 10
PARTICULAR.PURPOSE
Analyze the importance of the finance in the business, government and international, as well as their interactions for better
economic development organizations through the implementation of an analytical table of public or private entity.
No.
CONTENTS
Hours of
teaching
activities
T
1.1
1.1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
Hours of
autonomous learning
activities
1.5
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.5
1.0
7.0
5.0
Bibliographyc
key
1.5
29,69, 129.
179
LEARNING STRATEGIES
Length.
Documentary research in various media and sources on the content of the thematic unity.
Working in a team of finance function questionnaires.
Individual development of overview on financial strategies.
Making reading and understanding English texts, individually and as a team with language skills.
EVALUATION OF LEARNING
The evaluation will be integrated into the portfolio of evidences.
desk research report. 15%
Submit a synthesis that contains all the themes of unity considering a minimum of three pages.
Concept map. 10%
Show: the interrelation of the basics of Finance containing integrative notion, relational and
constructive.
Questionnaire. 10%
Comprised of a series of 10 questions with 4 possible answers for each question and 10 questions of
correlation.
Report of the discussion. 10%
The report should be contained in class, take into account the domain of the subject.
Summary table. 15%
Show the financial strategies that you can implement an organization based on the resources they
own.
Analytical Table. 20%
Show the structure of the finance of a company both public and private sector.
Written evaluation on English vocabulary,
extracts the information and participation 20%
Page: 4
of
10
Thematic Unit: II
PARTICULAR PURPOSE
Analyze the set of institutions involved in saving, investment and financing in the country, to determine from which part of
the financial information of regulators and financial institutions through the development of analytical tables.
Hours of
Hours of
teaching
Autonomous
activities
Bibliographyc
CONTENS
No.
learning
key
activites
T
2.1
1.0
1.1
2.2
Regulators
1.5
1.5
2.3
Finantial Institutions
1.0
1.0
2.3.1
Banking
1.0
2.3.2
Non - Banking
Finantial Operations
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.4
2.5
9.0
128
1.5
2.0
176
7.0
LEARNING STRATEGIES
Documentary research in various media and sources on the content of the thematic unity.
Development Team of overview outlining where the concentration and classification of regulatory bodies.
Working in teams of overview on financial institutions.
c Working in teams of an analytical table of financial operations.
Making reading and understanding English texts, individually and as a team with language skills.
EVALUATION OF LEARNING
* Report of documentary research. 15%
Provide summary containing all the themes of unity considering at least three pages.
* Summary table. 20%
Show: classification concentrate all regulatory agencies Mexican Financial System,
main objectives, functions, importance, regulatory framework,
* Summary table. 15%
Show: concentrate with the classification of financial institutions and non-bank, main objectives, functions,
importance.
* Table analftico. 30%
Show: financial transactions you can make an organization within the Mexican financial system in relation to
their resources.
* Written evaluation on English vocabulary, extracts information and participation.
20%
Page:
of 10
PARTICULAR PURPOSE
Apply the concepts, elements and techniques of working capital management, related to the optimization of the same, in
planning cash needs, through the resolution of practical for proper decision-making.
No.
CONTENTS
Hours of
Teaching
Hours of
autonomous
Activites
learning activities
3.0
Inventories
Reading text related to the unit in english
key
Bibliography
17B
LEARNING STRATEGIES
Documentary research in various media on the content of the thematic unity.
Solution team of case studies related to cash management.
Solution team of case studies related to the management of accounts receivable.
Solution team of case studies related to inventory management.
Making reading and understanding English texts, individually and as a team with language skills.
EVALUATION OF LEARNING
Desk research report. 15%
Provide summary containing all the themes of unity considering at least three pages.
Case study 1. Related cash management. 20% Show information, arguing the procedures used to obtain
the results and interpretations thereof.
Case Study 2. Management related receivables. 30%
Show the information, arguing the procedures used to obtain the results and interpretations thereof.
Case Study 3. Related inventory management. 15%
Show the information, arguing the procedures used to obtain the results and interpretations thereof.
Written evaluation on English vocabulary, extracts information and participation. 20%
Page: 6
Of
PARTICULAR PURPOSE
Assess the financial feasibility of permanent investments of an entity based on financial capacity, profitability and efficiency to
optimize their assets through the solution of practical cases
4.4
LEARNING STRATEGIES
178
Thematic Unity Subtotals:
10
Page: 7
Of
10
PARTICULAR PURPOSE
Analyze the financial impact of other assets to guide organizations in making decisions about resource optimization, through
a case study.
. 1.0
other expenses
sustainable aspects
1.0
LEARNING STRATEGIES
1
.
1
!
1
List of Practices
PRCTICE No.
Cash management
Objective: To take effective decisions
regarding the financial information of
organizations.
Accounts Receivable Management
Objective: To take decisions on
accounts receivable in relation to the
financial information of organizations.
Thematic
Unit
111
Duration
60
Classroom.
111
12.0
Classroom
Inventory Management
Objective:
Make
decisions
on
inventories in relation to financial
reporting of organizations.
111
6.0
Classroom.
Financial viability.
Objective: To make a diagnosis, and
critical analyisis on the financial viability
of the equity investments of an
organization.
IV
6.0
Classroom
6.0
Classroom
Other assets.
Objective: To analyze the impact
other financial assets in the
organizations
TOTAL Hours
36.0
Application Place
20%
30%
15%
30%
40%
Evaluation Procedure
Thematic Unit I Introduction to Finance 15 %
Thematic Unit II Mexican financial system 20%
Thematic Unit III Working Capital
30%
Thematic Unit IV-term investments
15%
Thematic Unit V Other Assets
20%
This learning unit itself may be attested by:
Demonstrated competence during the first three weeks after the start of the course and will be evaluated
through the resolution of a case study where observe integrator that owns at least 80% of the mastery of
core competencies to determine the integration of the elements Mexican financial system working capital,
equity investments and other assets, using financial tools applicable to it, to support sound decisionmaking.
Be studied in other higher education institutions or foreign nationals who have agreement with IPN
Mobility between ESCA's according to the attention span of each unit.
Mobility school modal according to the attention span
CLA
B
X
3
4
5
6
7
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
'
20
bibliography
Academic Unit:
Learning Plan:
Training Area:
LEVEL: II
INSTITUTIONAL
BASIC
Professional
Terminal and integration
SCIENTIFIC
individual
ACADEMY FINANCE
:
2. TEACHER PROFILE
KNOWLEDGE
In finance, in
financial
reporting
standards
PROFESSIONAL
EXPERIENCE
HABILITIES
ATTITUDES
Professional
experience in
financial area and
experience teaching
in Higher Education
(3 years minimum)
Communication, group
management, leadership,
teamwork, group
management techniques,
skills of analysis,
synthesis and decision
making
ACADEMIC PROGRAM:
LEARNING UNIT:
Pattern Recognition
LEVEL: III
Marques de S, J. P. (2001). Pattern Recognition: Concepts, Methods and Application (1 Ed.) USA: Ed.
Springer, 2001. ISBN: 3-540-42297-8.
Sergios, T. Konstantinos, K. (2009). Pattern Recognition (4 Ed.) USA: Elsevier Inc. ISBN: 0-12-685875-6.
Simon, H. (2008). Neural Networks and Learning Machines (3 Ed.) USA: Ed. Prentice Hall. 2008. ISBN-13:
9780131471399.
Yaez, C. Diaz de Len. S., M. Juan Luis (2003) Introduccin a las Memorias Asociativas. Serie Research
on Computing Science, Vol. 6, Instituto Politcnico Nacional, Mxico. ISBN: 970-360116-2.
ACADEMIC AIM
This learning unit contributes to the profile of graduate in Engineering in Computer Sciences to develop skills for analyzing
problems, developing systems that solve problems by applying techniques of pattern recognition and evaluation. This will
develop strategic thinking, creative thinking, collaborative work and participatory and assertive communication.
This unit has the units Algorithm and Structured Programming, Object-Oriented Programming, Compilers and
Computational theory as antecedents.
AIM OF THE LEARNING UNIT:
The student develops pattern-recognition applications through techniques and classifiers methods.
CREDITS HOURS
1.5
REVISED BY:
Dr. Flavio Arturo Snchez Garfias.
Subdireccin Acadmica
81
AUTHORIZED
BY:
Comisin
de
Programas Acadmicos del Consejo
General Consultivo del IPN
APPROVED BY:
Ing. Apolinar Francisco Cruz Lzaro.
Presidente del CTCE
Pattern Recognition
PAGE:
OUT OF
12
THEMATIC UNIT: I
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
1.1
T
0.5
1.2
0.5
1.3
0.5
1.4
Supervised Learning.
1.0
0.5
1.5
Unsupervised Learning.
1.0
0.5
1.6
Semi-Supervised Learning.
1.0
1.5
Subtotals:
4.5
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
REFERENCES
KEY
P
3B,4B
4.5
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This Thematic will apply a Case-Based learning process, through inductive and heuristic methods, thus permitting the
consolidation of the following learning techniques: address issues through exhibitions based on documentary research,
led discussion, problem solving and practical work. In the state of the art form the student develops underpins work to
make a concept map. In each topic we propose to move the project to evidence its development so this unit should
submit a proposal.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Diagnostic Test
Project Portfolio:
Concept maps
5%
Technical data
5%
Cooperative Presentation
10%
Reports of practicals
20%
Project Proposal
20%
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
5%
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics 5%
Written Learning Evidence
30%
Pattern Recognition
PAGE:
4 OUT OF
12
THEMATIC UNIT: II
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
No.
CONTENTS
2.1
T
0.5
2.2
Pre-Processing.
0.5
2.3
1.0
2.4
0.5
1.5
2.5
1.0
Subtotals:
3.5
REFERENCES
KEY
P
3B,4C,2C
4.5
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This Thematic will apply a Case-Based learning process, through inductive and heuristic methods using theoretical
and practical tools. Address issues through exhibitions based on documentary research, led discussion, problem
solving and practical work.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Revision of papers
10%
Cooperative Presentation
10%
Reports of practicals
20%
Project advance
20%
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
5%
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics 5%
Written Learning Evidence
30%
Pattern Recognition
PAGE:
5 OUT OF
12
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
3.1
Introduction.
T
0.5
3.2
3.3
T
1.0
0.5
1.0
1.0
Discriminants Functions.
0.5
1.0
1.0
3.4
1.0
0.5
2.0
3.5
1.0
1.0
2.0
3.6
Bayesian Networks
1.0
0.5
1.0
2.5
4.5
0.5
5.5
8.5
Subtotals:
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
REFERENCES KEY
3B,6B,4C
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This Thematic will apply a Case-Based learning process, through inductive and heuristic methods using theoretical and
practical tools. Address issues through exhibitions based on documentary research, led discussion, problem solving and
practical work.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Revision of papers
10%
Cooperative Presentation
10%
Reports of practicals
20%
Project advance
20%
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
5%
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics 5%
Written Learning Evidence
30%
Pattern Recognition
PAGE:
OUT OF
12
THEMATIC UNIT: IV
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
4.1
Introduction.
T
0.5
4.2
1.0
1.5
1.0
4.3
1.0
2.0
2.5
4.4
1.0
0.5
2.0
2.0
3.5
0.5
5.5
5.5
Subtotals:
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
REFERENCES
KEY
P
3B,6C,4C
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This Thematic will apply a Case-Based learning process, through inductive and heuristic methods using theoretical
and practical tools. Address issues through exhibitions based on documentary research, led discussion, problem
solving and practical work.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Revision of papers
10%
Cooperative Presentation
10%
Reports of practicals
20%
Project advance
20%
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
5%
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics 5%
Written Learning Evidence
30%
Pattern Recognition
PAGE:
OUT OF
12
THEMATIC UNIT: V
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
5.1
T
0.5
5.2
0.5
1.0
0.5
5.3
Two-layer perceptron
1.0
1.0
1.0
5.4
Three-layer perceptron
1.0
1.5
2.0
5.5
Back-Propagation Algorithm
1.0
1.0
2.0
4.5
5.5
Subtotals:
4.0
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
REFERENCES
KEY
P
5C,3B,1C
0.5
0.5
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This Thematic will apply a Case-Based learning process, through inductive and heuristic methods using theoretical
and practical tools. Address issues through exhibitions based on documentary research, led discussion, problem
solving and practical work.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Revision of papers
10%
Cooperative Presentation
10%
Reports of practicals
20%
Project advance
20%
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
5%
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics 5%
Written Learning Evidence
30%
Pattern Recognition
PAGE:
OUT OF
12
THEMATIC UNIT: VI
No.
Teacher ledinstruction
HOURS
CONTENTS
6.1
T
0.5
6.2
Learnmatrix.
0.5
0.5
6.3
Correlograph.
0.5
0.5
1.0
6.4
Linear Asociator.
1.0
1.5
1.5
6.5
1.0
1.0
1.5
6.6
1.5
0.5
1.0
1.5
5.0
0.5
4.5
5.5
Subtotals:
Autonomous
Learning
HOURS
T
REFERENCES
KEY
P
3B,7C,2C
TEACHING PRINCIPLES
This Thematic will apply a Case-Based learning process, through inductive and heuristic methods using theoretical
and practical tools. Address issues through exhibitions based on documentary research, led discussion, problem
solving and practical work.
LEARNING EVALUATION
Project Portfolio:
Revision of papers
10%
Cooperative Presentation
10%
Reports of practicals
20%
Project report
50%
Self-Evaluation Rubrics
5%
Cooperative Evaluation Rubrics 5%
Pattern Recognition
PAGE:
OUT OF
RECORD OF PRACTICALS
No.
THEMATIC
UNITS
DURATION
III
3.0
III
3.0
III
3.0
Neural network
implementation.
Perceptron
IV
3.0
Support
Vector
implementation.
Machine
classifier
IV
3.0
Back-Propagation
implementation.
Neural
network
3.0
3.0
Fingerprint
Recognizer
Memories implementation.
Associative
VI
3.0
Classifier
using
implementation.
Memories
VI
3.0
TOTAL OF
HOURS
27.0
classifier
with
with
Associative
ACCOMPLISHMENT
LOCATION
Computer Labs.
12
Pattern Recognition
PERIOD
UNIT
1
2
3
I , II
III , IV
V
VI
PAGE:
10
OUT OF
12
EVALUATION TERMS
Continuous evaluation 70% and written learning evidence
Continuous evaluation 70% and written learning evidence
Continuous evaluation 70% and written learning evidence
Continuous evaluation 100%
30%
30%
30%
Pattern Recognition.
B
2
3
PAGE:
11
OUT OF
C
X
REFERENCES
Bishop, C. (1996) Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. Oxford
University Press, USA (January 18, 1996) ISBN: 0198538642
6
7
12
ACADEMIC PROGRAM:
FORMATION AREA:
ACADEMY:
Institutional
Ingeniera de Software
Basic Scientific
LEARNING UNIT:
LEVEL
Professional
III
Terminal and
Integration
Pattern Recognition.
Pattern
recognition.
Analysis on
the extraction and
feature selection.
Knowledge about
techniques
classifier.
Programming
Languajes.
Knowledge of the
Institutional
Educational
Model.
English.
PROFESSIONAL
EXPERIENCE
ABILITIES
A year in PR
programming
Actual in
educational as
facilitator of the
knowledge of six
months.
A year in applying
Artificial
Intelligence
techniques.
A year experience
in the Institutional
Educational
Model.
Analysis and
synthesis.
Problems
resolution.
Cooperative.
Leadership.
Teaching skills.
Ability to manage
groups.
Editorial review
and evaluation.
Applications of
Institutional
Educational
Model.
Decision making.
APTITUDES
Responsible.
Tolerant.
Honest.
Respectful.
Collaborative.
Participative.
Interested to learning.
Assertive.
DESIGNED BY
REVISED BY
AUTHORIZED BY
Coordinating Professor
Dr. Mario Aldape Prez
Dr. Benjamn Luna Benoso
M. en C. Miriam Pescador Rojas.
Collaborating Professors
Date: 2011
Computer Vision
Joaquin Salas
Instituto Politecnico Nacional
jsalasr@ipn.mx
August-December 2011
Introduction
Computer Vision is an exciting and young eld of study where the interest is focused on extracting information out of images using the processing capabilities of computers. As an interdisciplinary crossroads it
attracts knowledge from Mathematics, in particular Applied Mathematics, Physics, in particular Optics,
Statistics, and Computer Science, in particular Articial Intelligence. Considering the apparently eortless process under which we obtain our visual information, it is amazing to verify just how complex it is
to make computers to achieve an equivalent level of performance. Yet, Computer Vision has evolved in
only roughly 40 years from anecdotal early attempts[1] to a major discipline with a vigorous and steady
steam of breakthroughs reected in prestigious conference talks (http://iris.usc.edu/Information/
Iris-Conferences.html), journal papers (http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~mignotte/VisionJournals.
html), and applications (http://www.cs.ubc.ca/~lowe/vision.html).
General Objective
The objective of this course is for the student to understand the fundamentals, explore the techniques,
domain the tools, and get acquittance of the current state of the art in computer vision.
2.1
Specific Objectives
Syllabus
The syllabus includes 14 topics. In them, we will dene the eld, its main diculties, some applications,
and broadly its history. In the topics we will get in the bolts and nuts of the eld exploring in some detail
the ideas on which the eld is based, the implementation of the techniques, and possible applications.
1. Problem denition and account of the eld
2. Image formation
Geometric primitives and transformations.
Photometric image formation and digital cameras.
3. Image processing
Point operations, linear ltering.
1
General Aspects
This course is addressed to graduate students. All of you have bachelors degrees and some of you master
degrees. Indeed some of you may have already some experience in the eld. In addition to this, widely
available access to information sources and computational resources make it necessary to make a fresh
approach to the way this study sessions take place. My view is that this semester you are reserving some
time to study the topic of Computer Vision and I happen to be the person that will guide you in the
particular process that you use to gain intuition in the problem. In addition to it I am invested with the
particular responsibility of assessing how well you have achieved the goals of this course. The joint work will
be put together in a course wiki. Project implementations can be in any computer language of any platform,
although we highly recommend the use of Matlab and OpenCV for development and Latex for writing.
You are required to attend all the classes but the equivalent to two weeks during the semester, otherwise
you fail the course. The textbook is Szeliski book in Computer Vision[2], which can be downloaded from
http://szeliski.org/Book/. All homeworks, reports and presentations are going to be submitted and
graded on the CICATA Queretaro moodle platform (http://cv.cicataqro.ipn.mx/moodle/).
4.1
Course Mechanics
At the end of each session, teams will be created and I am going to give you homework, the objective, and
concepts and skills you are expected to acquire by the end of the next session. Additionally, you may be
provided with a number of articles and web links to explore on your own. Based on the framework, the
provided sources of information, and the supplemental information that your team may be able to obtain,
you are expected to deliver a power point presentation. Your peers and myself are going to ask you questions
on the topic under review. Sometimes we are going to get stuck. Laptops and other communication devices
are going to be needed to look for information and enrich our discussions. Of course the better prepared
we are for the session the least needed it will be to look for additional information, proofs or references
but all the devices to access information are welcome during the discussion sessions.
During the semester there will be two small projects to implement the ideas seen in class and one nal
project. These projects are required to be developed in teams. Also, there are going to be two partial tests
and one nal examination; these are going to be individual.
4.2
Evaluation
The course is going to be evaluated on four bases: homework, presentations, exams and examinations.
For all of them, I am going to ask you feedback but I will take the nal decision. The evaluation of the
course will include the partial tests (10% + 10%), the implemented projects (10% + 10%), homeworks
and presentations (25%), the nal test (20 %) and the nal project (15%). Partial test are planned for
September 13, and October 25. The partial projects are due one week after them. A nal test will be held
on December 1. The nal project will be due one week after that. The deadline to declare the nal project
is October 25. Passing grade is 8.0.
References
[1] N.J. Nilsson. The Quest for Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge University Press, 2009.
[2] R. Szeliski. Computer Vision: Algorithms and Applications. Microsoft Research, 2010.
Thermodynamics
CODE: 3460
CREDITS: 12
General Objective
The objective of this course is to provide necessary knowledge on the use of thermodynamic
laws and their applications to equilibrium and the properties of materials.
Specific Objectives
To apply appropriate concepts and develop models for multiphase equilibrium and for the
construction of phase diagrams.
To provide appropriate concepts from electrochemistry and thermodynamics of surfaces.
To introduce the concept of exegesis and the efficient use of energy in process.
Syllabus
UNIT I. INTRODUCTION
I.1 Definitions and Thermodynamic Variables (Temperature, Pressure, Energy, Internal Energy,
Heat, Work, State, Phase)
I.2 Gas Law and description of ideal gas
I.3 Variables and functions of State
1.4 Thermodynamic Quantities (extensive and intensive)
I.5 Thermodynamic Systems (open, closed, isolated)
I.6 Ideal Gas Law
I.7 Equation of State
I.8 Behavior of a real gas (Deviations from ideal systems)
I.9 Zero Law
I.10 The Chemical Reaction and the concept of initial and final state
UNIT II. Termochemistry and the First Law of Thermodynamics
II.1 Framework of the First Law of Thermodynamics
II.2 Heat capacity at P & T constant. Relationship between CP y Cv
II.3 Heat capacity of different materials. Theoretical and empiric determinations
II.4 Enthalpy
II.5 Thermodynamic Data Bases
II.6 Hess Law and Energy Balance
II.7 Calorimetry
II.8 Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC), Thermogram analysis
II.9 Differential Thermal Analysis (DTA) y Thermogram analysis
UNIT III. Second Law of Thermodynamics
III.1 Framework of the Second Law of Thermodynamics
III.2 Entropy
III.3 Entropy Balance
III.4 Clausius Equation
III.5 Gibbs Free Energy
III.6 Free Energy Balance
III.7 Helmholtz Energy
III.8 Helmholtz Energy Balance
III.9 Maxwell Relations
III.10 Gibbs Free Energy in reversible process
III.11 Gibbs Free Energy in irreversible process
III.12 Ellingham Richardson Diagrams
Bibliography
C. H. P. Lupis. Chemical Thermodynamics of Materials. Elsevier Science Pu. Co. ISBN: 0-4440779-2, 1983
2 G. M. Anderson. Thermodynamics of natural systems. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN: 0-47110943-6., 1996
3 J. Ott and Juliana Boering-Goates. Chemical Thermodynamics: Principles and Applications.
Academic Press. ISBN 0-12-530990-2. 2000
4 J. Ott and Juliana Boering-Goates. Chemical Thermodynamics: Advanced Applications.
Academic
Press. ISBN 0-12-530985-6. 2000
5 Donald T. Hayne. Biological Thermodynamics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN13:9780521791656. 2001
6 Norio Sato. Chemical Energy and Exergy. Elsevier Science. ISBN 0-444-51645-X. 2004
7 Paul Arnaud. Chimie Physique. Dunod. ISBN 2 10 003209 7. 1998
8 John B. Hudson. Surface Science.John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0-471-25239-5. 1992
Evaluation
Three written examinations (wks. 6, 12 y 18) and a final evaluation.
Homeworks of 10 to 15 problems each one.
Control readings of research papers and written reports.
ACADMIC UNIT:
ACADEMIC
PROGRAM:
Licenciatura en turismo
LEARNING UNIT:
LEVEL: V
GENERAL OBJETIVE: To Designe a touristical service organization project, including aspects of total quality,
mainly transportation lines, travel agencies, hotel industry and restaurants.
CONTENTS:
I.
II.
III.
IV.
V.
VI.
DIDACTIC ORIENTATION:
The didactic orientation includes the teaching of self-learning techniques, such as searching for information, information
analysis, exercises, tasks. As well as collective activities such as collaborative work, remarking the learning based on projects
(POL), among others.
EVALUATION Y ACCREDITATION:
This learning unit can be passed through a theoretical exam that must be approved with a 6 minimum grade and
should be applied two weeks before the beginning of the normal period of classes of the corresponding semester,
by means of a previous authorization from the Programacin y Evaluacin Acadmica departament.
The evaluation wil be continuous, considering the following aspects: written reports , team presentations, concept
maps, debates, essays, information searching, elaboration of comparative frames and the attendance to forums
and electronic blogs; as well as three written tests.
BIBLIOGRAPHY:
Belln lvarez, Luis Alberto. Calidad total. Editorial Panorama. Mxico, 2001. 93 pgs. ISBN 968380984-7
Cant Delgado, Humberto. Desarrollo de una cultura de calidad. Editorial Mc Graw-Hill. Mxico, 2006. 450 pgs.
ISBN 970105816X, 9789701058169
Goldratt, Eliyahu. La meta un proceso de mejora continua. 5 edicin. Ediciones Castillo. Mxico, 1999. 425
pgs. ISBN 0884271641, 9780884271642
Gutirrez Pulido, Humberto. Calidad total y productividad. Editorial Mc. Graw Hill. Mxico, 2005. 403 pgs.
ISBN 9701048776, 9789701048771
Hay, Edward J. Justo a tiempo: la tcnica japonesa que genera mayor ventaja competitiva. Editorial Norma.
Bogot, 2005. 255 pgs. ISBN 958-04-7027-8
LEVEL: V
CREDITS: 8.0
MODALITY: Presential
GENERAL PURPOSE
According to the control regulations, graduated students from Licenciatura en Turismo will interpret manuals related
with the quality (excellence) within the rendering of touristic services.
This learning unit is ralated in antecedent way to: Desarrollo humano; Turismo y medio ambiente; Administracin;
Comportamiento organizacional; Administracin del capital humano; Auditora administrativa; Marco legal turstico;
Administracin estratgica; Direccin de las reas de contacto en hoteles; Sistema globalizador de reservaciones I, II
y III; Gestin de turismo sustentable; Sistemas de gestin ambiental para el turismo; Direccin de reas de apoyo en
hoteles; Mantenimiento de instalaciones; Normatividad, certificacin y competencias laborales; Administracin de
hoteles I y Administracin de restaurantes I. It is related in collateral way with: Creatividad e innovacin de empresas
tursticas; Administracin de restaurantes II y con Administracin de hoteles II.
GENERAL OBJECTIVE
To design a touristical service organization project, including top quality aspects, mainly focused in transportation
lines, travel agencies, hotel industry and restaurants.
ASSIGNED TIMES
THEORY HOURS /WEEK: 3.5
PRACTICE HOURS /WEEK: 1.0
THEORY HOURS/SEMESTER:
63.0
PRACTICE HOURS /SEMESTER:
18.0
TOTAL HOURS /SEMESTER: 81.0
LEARNING UNIT
DESIGNED BY:
Academia de Administracin
AUTHORIZED BY:
Comisin de Programas
Acadmicos del Consejo
General Consultivo del IPN
REVISADED BY:
Lic. Orlando E. Aguirre Hernndez
Subdirector Acadmico
APPROVED BY:
Lic. Roberto Bravo Jimnez
Presidente de Consejo Tcnico
Consultivo Escolar.
Enero 2009
SHEET:
THEMTIC UNIT: I
OF
PARTICULAR OBJECTIVE
Categorize the cultural expressions in a diachronic and synchronic manner of the terms culture,
civilization and quality on a time line.
No.
AD HOURS
TEACHING
ACTIVITIES
(a)
CONTENTS
T
1.1
1.2
1.2.1
1.2.2
1.2.3
1.3
1.3.1
1.3.2
3.0
3.0
Subtotal
9.0
HORAS TAA
Self-learning
Activities
(b)
CLAVE
BIBLIOGR
APHICAL
KEY
10.0
2B,
4B,8B,
9B
3.0
ADDITI
ON
10.0
ADDITI
ON
ADDITION
ADDITION
LEARNING STRATEGIES
Teaching strategies: Course introduction and team formation; Students presentation using thge inductive
method.
Learning strategies: Searching for and clasifying documental information, written essay , time line with
a theoretical fundament and presentation.
Continuous Evaluation:
Written Report about searching for and clasifying documental information 10%
Written Essay
20%
Exposition
20%
Time Line
30%
Written test
20%
11
SHEET:
THEMTIC UNIT:
II
OF
PARTICULAR OBJECTIVE
Analyze the main philosophical principles, processes and concepts of total quality and service within
touristic companies for their optimal performance, reporting the evidences in written form.
AD HOURS
HORAS TAA
TEACHING
Self-learning
CLAVE
BIBLIOGR
ACTIVITIES
Activities
No.
CONTENTS
APHICAL
(a)
(b)
KEY
T
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.0
2.0
2.0
10.0
1B,2B,
4B,6B
2.0
2.0
2.0
10.0
12.0
ADDITI
ON
ADDITI
ON
ADDITION
ADDITION
LEARNING STRATEGIES
Learning strategies: searching for documental information, elaboration comparative chart, report and
presentation.
Teaching strategies: Topic presentation using explorative questioning.
ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING OUTCOMES
Continuous Evaluation:
Written report about the searching for documental information
Comparative Chart
Written report
Written test
20%
30%
30%
20%
11
SHEET:
THEMTIC UNIT:
OF
III
PARTICULAR OBJECTIVE
Apply the quality gap techniques in a practice case avoiding with it the conflict company- costumer.
No.
AD HOURS
TEACHING
ACTIVITIES
(a)
CONTENTS
T
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
Quality Cost
Quality improvement Programs
Zero defects and drop off
Quality Gap
Costumers and Quality
HORAS TAA
Self-learning
Activities
(b)
T
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
3.0
10.0
11.0
10.0
CLAVE
BIBLIOGR
APHICAL
KEY
P
1B,
2B,
3B,4B,
8B,9B
Subtotal
ADDITI
ON
ADDITI
ON
ADDITION
ADDITION
LEARNING STRATEGIES
Learning strategies: searching for documental information, elaboration of a comparative chart about
quality gaps, practice: study case and presentation.
Teaching strategies: Topic presentation throughout movie projections.
Continuous Evaluation:
10%
20%
20%
30%
20%
11
SHEET:
OF
THEMTIC UNIT: IV
Quality Evaluation
Measurement and Control by Type of
Touristic Companies Systems
Regulations and Quality Normativity
The global future of quality
Excellence vs. Quality
2.0
2.0
5.0
10.0
Subtotal
10.0
5.0
10.0
ADDITI
ON
ADDITI
ON
ADDITION
P
1B,2B,
4B,5B,
7C
2.0
2.0
2.0
ADDITION
LEARNING STRATEGIES
Learning strategies: searching for documental information, elaboration of a comparative chart about
national and international quality, and presentation.
Practice: touristic organizations and quality.
Teaching strategies: presentation of the topic using SECTUR publications and CONOCER program.
ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING OUTCOMES
Continuous Evaluation:
Searching for documental information report
Comparative chart
Presentation
Practice
Written test
10%
30%
25%
15%
20%
11
SHEET:
OF
THEMTIC UNIT: V
Labor Force
Materials ( suppliers)
Environment
Machinnery and working equipment
Methods and Operation Processes
Subtotal
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
4.0
10.0
10.0
4.0
10.0
ADDITI
ON
ADDITI
ON
ADDITION
3B,4B,
6B,9B
ADDITION
LEARNING STRATEGIES
Learning strategies: Searching for documental information, elaboration of a productivity diagram and
presentation.
Practice: Quality applications.
Teaching strategies: Topic presentation.
ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING OUTCOMES
Continuous evaluation:
Searching for documental information report
Productivity Diagram
Presentation
Practice
10%
30%
20%
20%
Written test
20%
11
SHEET:
OF
THEMTIC UNIT: VI
Subtotal
1.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
9.0
11.0
9.0
10.0
ADDITI
ON
ADDITI
ON
ADDITION
10.0
1B,2B,
3B,6B,
7C
ADDITION
LEARNING STRATEGIES
Learning strategies: searching for documental information, elaboration of a manual and presentation.
Practice: foment a quality culture
Teaching strategies: final project advisory.
ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING OUTCOMES
Continuous Evaluation:
Searching for documental information report
Manual presentation
Presentation
Practice: To foment a quality culture
Written test
10%
30%
20%
20%
20%
11
LEARNING UNIT:
SHEET:
PRACTICE REGISTER
PRACTICE No.
PRACTICE NAME
Organizations
and
the
THEMATIC
UNITS
TIMING
VENUE
IV
5.0
Classroom
Touristic
Quality
Quality Applications
9.0
Classroom
VI
4.0
Classroom
Subtotal
18.0
TOTAL OF
HOURS
ASSESSMENT AND ACCREDITATION
The value of all of the practices is
20%
Anotar el
total
de
horas.
OF
11
SHEET:
10
OF
11
ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE
1 Period I y II continuous evaluation 80% and written test 20%
2 Period III y IV continuous evaluation 80% and written test 20%
3 Period V, VI
continuous evaluation 80% and written test 20%
KEY
1
B
X
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Belln lvarez, Luis Alberto. Calidad total. Editorial Panorama. Mxico,
2001. 93 pgs. ISBN 968380984-7
10
11
12
13
Hansen, Mark Victor & Batten, Joe. The Master Motivator. Secrets of
Inspiring Leadership. Editor: Health Communications, INC. U.S.A., 1995.
120 pages. ISBN 1-558 74-355-3.
14
GENERAL INFORMATION
ACADMIC UNIT:
ACADEMIC
PROGRAM:
Licenciatura en Turismo
LEVEL
FORMATION REA:
ACADEMY:
Institutional
Formation
Administracin y Mercadotecnia
Basic Scientific
Formation
V
Professional
Formation
Terminal and
Integrative
Formation
Licenciatura en Turismo
LEARNING UNIT OBJETIVE: To design a touristical service organization project, including top quality
aspects, mainly focused in transportation lines, travel agencies, hotel industry and restaurants.
2. TEACHING PROFILE :
KNOWLEDGE
About hotel administration,
restaurant administracin,
quality certification, or
Industrial engineering and
auditing knowledge.
PROFESSIONAL
EXPERIENCE
At
least
one-year
experience within the field.
Quality certification and at
least one-year-experience
teaching similar subjects.
ELABORATED BY
Nombre y firma del Presidente de Academia
SKILLS
ATTITUDES
Precision,
meticulosity,
organization of processes
and
qualitative and
quantitative level methods.
Good
appearance,
responsability, goog attitude
towards
work,
good
at
interpersonal
relashionship,
social compromise, positive
group leadership.
REVISED BY
Nombre y firma del Subdirector Acadmico
AUTHORIZED BY
Nombre del Director de la Unidad Acadmica
LEVEL: v
GENERAL OBJETIVE: To prepare a project of a product or a touristic service for an organization, using concepts
and techniques that make the training and development of creativity and innovation.
CONTENTS:
I.
II.
III.
Creativity
Innovation
Innovator Project Design
DIDACTIC ORIENTATION:
According to the Educative Model of the Institute, and to the new psicopedagogic directions, which collocate the
students learning in the center of the educative process, and that recognizes the indissoluble partnership between
theory and practice in the significative and effective labor facing theoretical, methological and applied problems.
The teaching- learning methodology is oriented to the establishment of effective labor facing disciplinar problems
in meaningful and effective actions to face other problems such as theoretical, methodological and of application.
The teaching-learning methodology is oriented to the establishment of effective performances to face up to two
different sorts of problems; disciplinary ones and integral professional exercise ones in their technical, procedural,
theoretical, conceptual and ethical dimensions.
EVALUATION Y ACCREDITATION:
In order to create an atmosphere in which the learning process is stimulated during the development of the learning
unit, it is important that the students know the evaluation criteria and procedures, as well as the commitments
acquired within their academic contract which make the students participate individually as well as collectively.
The subject will be assessed with a written examination in each partial period which will represent 30% of the total
grade; the 70% left corresponds to continuous assessment.
For the course assessment, the theoretical part will have to be passed as well as the practical part. The minimum
acceptable passing grade is 6.0.
BIBLIOGRAPHY:
rnndez Romero, Andrs. Creatividad e innovacin en empresas y organizaciones. Tcnicas para la solucin de
blemas. Ediciones Daz de Santos. Madrid, 2005. 261 pgs. ISBN 8479787244.
King, Nigel. Cmo administrar la innovacin y el cambio: gua crtica para organizaciones, Editorial Paraninfo.
Madrid, 2004. 248 pgs. ISBN 8497321863
OECD y Eurostat. Manual de Oslo. Gua para la recogida e interpretacin de datos sobre innovacin. 3 edicin.
Editorial Tragsa. Madrid, 2005. 124 pgs. ISBN 92-64-15464-7
Valdes Buratti Luigi A. Innovacin: el arte de inventar el futuro. Grupo Editorial Norma. Bogot, 2004. 380 pgs.
ISBN 9580480710
TYPE
OF
compulsory
LEARNING
UNIT:
Teoretical-practical-
MODALITY: Presential
GENERAL PURPOSE
The purpose of this learning unit is that the learner considers the concern of the creativity and the innovation and
becomes knower of its mechanical process. The graduate student will be a person able to create new products
and/or services which satisfy visitors needs, implementing technology and with a greater investment, by a previous
plan for the competence right place .
The following learning units precede it: Administracin estratgica, Comercializacin de productos tursticos,
Investigacin de mercados tursticos, Planificacin y desarrollo de productos tursticos, Planificacin y desarrollo de
destinos tursticos, Identificacin y formulacin de proyectos de inversin I.
it is collateral to: Cultura de la calidad, Plan de mercadotecnia e Identificacin y formulacin de proyectos de inversin
II.
GENERAL OBJECTIVE
To prepare a Project of a product or a touristic service for an organization, using concepts and techniques that make
the training and development of creativity and innovation possible.
ASSIGNED TIMES
THEORY HOURS /WEEK: 3.5
PRACTICE HOURS /WEEK: 1.0
THEORY HOURS/SEMESTER:
63.0
REVISED BY:
Lic. Orlando E. Aguirre Hernndez
Subdirector Acadmico
AUTHORIZED BY:
Comisin
de
Programas
Acadmicos
del
Consejo
General Consultivo del IPN
APPROVED BY:
Lic. Roberto Bravo Jimnez
Presidente del Consejo Tcnico Consultivo
Escolar 2009
SHEET:
THEMTIC UNIT: I
OF
NAME: Creativity
PARTICULAR OBJECTIVE
To describe the different aspects of creativity as a form of wealthness recreation in a cognitive map.
No.
CONTENTS
AD HOURS
TEACHING
ACTIVITIES
(a)
T
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
Definitions of Creativity
Creativity Theoretical Contributions
Creativity Applications
Other Concepts Related to Creativity:
Imagination and Innovation
Barrers and Metal Blockades of Creativity
Creativity Components
Types of Thoughts and Creativity
Creative Process
Creativity Stimulation Techniques
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
CLAVE
BIBLIOGR
APHICAL
KEY
P
1B,
6B,
13B,
3B,
5B,7C.
6.0
2.0
2.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
21.0
HORAS TAA
Self-learning
Activities
(b)
ADDITI
ON
6.0
ADDITI
ON
ADDITION
ADDITION
LEARNING STRATEGIES
Teaching strategies : Course introduction, team formation, teachers presentation.
Learning strategies: Mind maps and cognitive maps, research task on the unit topics, using the
tecnique of Aronsons Jigzaw Puzzle.
ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING OUTCOMES
Continuous Evaluation:
Cognitive map about creativity
Research report
Concept map about creativity stimulation techniques
First partial written test
10%
30%
30%
30%
SHEET:
THEMTIC UNIT: II
OF
NAME: Innovation
PARTICULAR OBJECTIVE
To describe on a cognitive map the different aspects of innovation as a form to create competitivity within
the industrial and service sectors.
No.
CONTENTS
AD HOURS
TEACHING
ACTIVITIES
(a)
T
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
HORAS TAA
Self-learning
Activities
(b)
2.0
2.0
7.0
9B,
4C, 8C
y I4C
2.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
6.0
21.0
CLAVE
BIBLIOGR
APHICAL
KEY
ADDITI
ON
7.0
ADDITI
ON
ADDITION
ADDITION
LEARNING STRATEGIES
Teaching strategies: Teaching presentation.
Learning strategies: Mind maps and cognitive maps, research task about all of the topics contained in
this unit, using the tecnique of Aronsons Jigzaw Puzzle.
Continuous Evaluation:
Cognitive map about creativity
Research report
Concept map about creativity stimulation techniques
Second partial written test
10%
30%
30%
30%
SHEET:
OF
18.0
8.0
21.0
18.0
8.0
ADDITI
ON
ADDITI
ON
ADDITION
3.1
3.0
3.2
3.0
3.3
15.0
subtotal
P
12B,
14C,
2C,
10C,1
1C.
ADDITION
LEARNING STRATEGIES
Teaching strategies: Teaching presentation and advisory.
Learning strategies: Project Oriented Learning (POL)
Practice: Preparation of the project of product, service, process, technological application or method
development which rises touristical organization added value.
ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING OUTCOMES
Continuos Evaluation:
Practice: preparation of a collective innovation project
Third partial written test
70%
30%
LEARNING UNIT:
SHEET:
PRACTICE REGISTER
PRACTICE No.
PRACTICE NAME
THEMATIC
UNITS
TIMING
III
18.0
Subtotal
18.0
TOTAL OF
HOURS
Anotar el
total
de
horas.
VENUE
Classroom
OF
ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE
Written test 30%, Continuous evaluation 70%
Written test 30%, Continuous evaluation 70%
Written test 30%, Continuous evaluation 70%
1 Unit I,II,III
2 Unit IV,V y VI
3 Unit VII,VIII Y IX
KEY
SHEET:
BIBLIOGRAPHY
OF
X
X
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
GENERAL INFORMATION
ACADMIC UNIT:
ACADEMIC
PROGRAM:
Licenciatura en Turismo
FORMATION REA:
ACADEMY:
LEVEL
Institutional
Formation
Basic Scientific
Formation
V
Professional
Formation
LEARNING UNIT:
Administracin y mercadotecnia
Terminal and
Integrative
Formation
Creatividad e innovacin
en empresas tursticas
Licenciatura en Turismo.
LEARNING UNIT OBJETIVE: To prepare a Project of a product or a touristic service for an organization, using
concepts and techniques that make the training and development of creativity and innovation.
2. TEACHING PROFILE :
KNOWLEDGE
PROFESSIONAL
EXPERIENCE
SKILLS
ATTITUDES
On
innovation
and
technolgical
development,
administration
of
knowledge and strategical
administration
Management of teaching
strategies , self-learning
and collaborative learning,
manegement of applied
processes
to real
problems of the sector.
Patience,
tolerance,
respectful,
innovator,
constant,
responsible,
punctual, dinamic, deductive,
creative,
with
social
compromise.
ELABORATED BY
Nombre y firma del Presidente de Academia
REVISED BY
Nombre y firma del Subdirector Acadmico
AUTHORIZED BY
Nombre del Director de la Unidad Acadmica
ACADMIC UNIT:
ACADEMIC
PROGRAM:
B.A. TOURISM
LEARNING UNIT:
Sales Management
LEVEL: V
GENERAL OBJECTIVE:
To design a manual of basic functions of direction and sales administration for any touristic organization.
CONTENTS:
I.
II.
III.
IV.
V.
DIDACTIC ORIENTATION:
Didactic orientation includes self-learning strategies, such as: concept maps, flow diagrams, organigrams and
practical exercises; as well as collaborative learning strategies: round tables, information analysis, questionnaries,
interviews and group lectures.
Teaching strategies: lectures, use of inductive methods.
ASSESSMENT AND ACCREDITATION:
The assesment will be obtained throughout continuous evaluation: class participation, attendance, practical
exercises, concept maps, flow charts, organigrams and group presentations.
BIBLIOGRAPHY:
Cmara Ibez, Dionisio. Direccin de ventas. Editorial Pearson Educacin. Madrid, 2001. 283 pgs. ISBN
8420532126
Gua de mercadeo y las ventas de lo mejor de Inc. Ediciones Ventura. Mxico, 1991. 297 pgs. ISBN 9686346287,
9789686346282
Hartley, Robert F. Administracin de ventas. Editorial CECSA. Mxico, 2000. 527 pgs. ISBN 9682602785
L. Foster, Dennis. Ventas y mercadotecnia para el profesional del Turismo. Editorial McGraw-Hill. Mxico, 1994.
233 pgs. ISBN 9701003659, 9789701003657
Russell, Federick A. Manual prctico. Vol. I y II. Editorial Mc Graw Hill. Mxico, 2000. 302 pgs. ISBN 968-451751-3
Stanton, W., et al. Ventas, conceptos, planificacin y estrategias. Editorial Mc Graw Hill. Mxico, 1997. 536 pgs.
ISBN: 9586007030.
PROFESSIONAL ASOCIATED:
LEVEL: V
FORMATIVE AREA: Professional
CREDITS: 8.0
MODALITY: Presential
GENERAL PURPOSE
This thematic unit contributes importantly to graduate students profile, it makes students competent in the appropriate
management of strategies and sales policies at management and chairman on the board level.
This unit is related in antecedent with: Desarrollo de habilidades del pensamiento; Comunicacin oral y escrita;
Administracin; Destinos y productos tursticos del mundo y de Mxico I y II; Comportamiento organizacional;
Investigacin de mercados tursticos; Administracin del capital humano; Comercializacin de productos tursticos;
Planificacin turstica; Direccin de cocinas; Direccin del servicio de restaurantes; Direccin de reas de apoyo en
hoteles; Ventas de servicios y banquetes; Ventas hoteleras; and collaterally with: Administracin estratgica;
Administracin de restaurantes; Administracin de hoteles y de manera subsecuente con: Administracin de
restaurantes II; Administracin de hoteles, Plan de mercadotecnia; Cultura de la calidad en las organizaciones
tursticas e Innovacin de empresas tursticas.
GENERAL OBJECTIVE
To design a manual of basic functions of direction and sales administration for any touristic organization.
ASSIGNED TIMES
THEORY HOURS /WEEK: 3.5
AUTHORIZED BY:
Academia de Administracin y
Mercadotecnia
Comisin de Programas
Acadmicos del Consejo
General Consultivo del IPN
THEORY HOURS/SEMESTER:
63.0
PRACTICE HOURS /SEMESTER:
18.0
TOTAL HOURS /SEMESTER:
81.0
SHEET:
THEMTIC UNIT: I
OF
PARTICULAR OBJECTIVE
To describe the sales labour per periods, within the marketing annual plan, establishing strategies of
commercialization throughout a time line.
No.
AD HOURS
TEACHING
ACTIVITIES
(a)
CONTENTS
T
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
HORAS TAA
Self-learning
Activities
(b)
2.0
2.0
2.0
BIBLIOGR
APHICAL
KEY
3.0
1C,
2C,5B,
7C
2.0
8.0
3.0
Subtotal
ADDITI
ON
ADDITI
ON
ADDITION
ADDITION
LEARNING STRATEGIES
Teaching strategies: course introduction, team formation with presentations throughout the inductive
method.
Learning strategies: search for and classify documental information, flow diagram elaboration,
presentation through a sales simulation and a line time with theoretical support.
20%
25%
25%
30%
10
SHEET:
THEMTIC UNIT: II
OF
PARTICULAR OBJECTIVE
To make an activity chronogram of the sales points, increasing the product demand and / or services,
based on a publicity annual plan.
AD HOURS
HORAS TAA
TEACHING
Self-learning
CLAVE
BIBLIOGR
ACTIVITIES
Activities
No.
CONTENTS
APHICAL
(a)
(b)
KEY
T
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.0
1.0
2.0
1C,
2C,5B,
7C
2.0
2.0
3.0
7.0
ADDITI
ON
ADDITI
ON
ADDITION
ADDITION
LEARNING STRATEGIES
Learning strategies: interviews, questionnary application, data analisys and interpretation, elaboration
of executive report, activity chronogram and sales points.
Teaching strategies: facilitators presentation and coordination.
ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING OUTCOMES
Continuous Evaluation:
Interviews and questionnaries
Chronogram
Data analisys and interpretation
Executive report with conclusions and recommendations
20%
30%
20%
30%
10
SHEET:
OF
PARTICULAR OBJECTIVE
To make a descriptive catalogue with planning component elements.
No.
AD HOURS
TEACHING
ACTIVITIES
(a)
CONTENTS
T
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.5.1
Types of Enterprises
(hotels, travel
agencies, restaurants)
Common Forms of Sales or Systems
Function Delegation and Responsability
Assignment.
Objectives and Policies of Price and
Payment System to Suppliers
Objectives and Policies of Confirmation
and Collection of Payment Forms to
Clients.
Objectives and Policies of Discount,
HORAS TAA
Self-learning
Activities
(b)
1.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
CLAVE
BIBLIOGR
APHICAL
KEY
P
9.0
3C,
4C, 6B
7.0
3.5.2
3.6
16.0
9.0
Subtotal
Thematic Unit Subtotal *
ADDITI
ON
ADDITI
ON
LEARNING STRATEGIES
Learning strategies: documental information searching reports,
presentations) and catalogue elaboration.
ADDITION
presentations (audiovisual
ADDITION
10
SHEET:
THEMTIC UNIT: IV
OF
PARTICULAR OBJECTIVE
Analyse the processes and strategies of sales in markets for high return rate and competitiviness,
evidencing them within an enterprised system.
No.
CONTENTS
AD HOURS
TEACHING
ACTIVITIES
(a)
HORAS TAA
Self-learning
Activities
(b)
9.0
9.0
16.0
9.0
9.0
ADDITI
ON
ADDITI
ON
ADDITION
4.1
Sales
Team
Formation (recruitment,
seletion and hiring of sales executives)
3.0
4.2
2.0
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
Market Research
4.7
Competitive Forces
BIBLIOGR
APHICAL
KEY
P
3C,
4C, 6B
2.0
2.0
2.0
3.0
2.0
ADDITION
LEARNING STRATEGIES
Learning strategies: Use of whispering techniques to exchange information, analysis of information,
round tables, enterprised system performance, topic presentation in group form.
Practice: Sales organization
Teaching strategies: presentation and advisory.
ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING OUTCOMES
Continuous Evaluation:
Analysis of information report
Enterprise system
Topic presentation
Practice
15%
30%
30%
25%
10
SHEET:
THEMTIC UNIT: V
OF
PARTICULAR OBJECTIVE
To make an integral communication plan for the sales area.
No.
5.1
AD HOURS
TEACHING
ACTIVITIES
(a)
CONTENTS
Public
Image
Expenditures.
and
Mass
Media
2.0
9.0
10.0
5.2
3.0
5.3
Product Added
Difference.
3.0
5.4
2.0
5.5
2.0
5.6
Extraordinary Payments
Special Commisions)
5.7
Value
to
Make
(Viatica
and
HORAS TAA
Self-learning
Activities
(b)
CLAVE
BIBLIOGR
APHICAL
KEY
P
5B,8B,
9B,10
C,
11B,
12C
2.0
2.0
Subtotal
Thematic Unit Subtotal *:
9.0
10.0
ADDITI
ON
ADDITION
16.0
ADDITI
ON
ADDITION
LEARNING STRATEGIES
Learning strategies: information searching, the making of an integral communication plan for the sales
area, working it in teams.
Practice: Management and control of sales budget..
Teaching strategies: coordination, supervision and advisory for the plan making process.
ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING OUTCOMES
Continuous Evaluation
Media plan presentation and practice 100%
10
LEARNING UNIT:
SHEET:
OF
10
PRACTICE REGISTER
PRACTICE No.
PRACTICE NAME
THEMATIC
UNITS
TIMING
VENUE
Sales Organization
IV
9.0
9.0
Subtotal
18.0
TOTAL OF
HOURS
Anotar el
total
de
horas.
SHEET:
ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE
ST
1 Period I, II
Continuous Evaluation 100%
nd
2 Period III, IV Continuous Evaluation 100%
rd
3 Period V
Continuous Evaluation 100%
KEY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
OF
10
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Blinder,
Alan
S.
The
Economics
of
public
finance
Volumen 36 de Studies of government finance. Editor: Atlantic Publishers
& Distri. U.S.A.,1974. Pages 435. Without ISBN
GENERAL INFORMATION
ACADMIC UNIT:
ACADEMIC PROGRAM:
Licenciatura en Turismo
FORMATION REA:
ACADEMY:
Institutional
Formation
LEVEL
Basic Scientific
Formation
LEARNING UNIT:
Administration
v
Professional
Formation
Terminal and
Integrative
Formation
LEARNING UNIT OBJETIVE: To design a manual of basic functions of direction and sales administration for
any touristic organizations.
2. TEACHING PROFILE :
KNOWLEDGE
In Marketing,
Communication, Graphic
Design, Business
Administration.
PROFESSIONAL
SKILLS
ATTITUDES
EXPERIENCE
Two-year experience on Dynamism, able to analyze
Good appearance,
sales management, with at
responsability, good attitude
,to synthesize , to
least one-year experience research. This person has to work, good at interpersonal
in marketing and mass
relationships, social
to be creative and
media. At least one-year
compromise, group
innovative.
teaching experience in this
leadership.
area.
ELABORATED BY
Nombre y firma del Presidente de Academia
REVISED BY
Nombre y firma del Subdirector Acadmico
AUTHORIZED BY
Nombre del Director de la Unidad Acadmica
ACADMIC UNIT:
ACADEMIC
PROGRAM:
B.A. TOURISM
LEARNING UNIT:
Marketing Plan
LEVEL: V
GENERAL OBJECTIVE:
To design a marketing plan according to the selected tourist enterprise requirements.
CONTENTS:
I. The Tourist Enterprise and the marketing plan
II. Sorroundings and Environment Analysis (internal) FODA
III. Marketing Potential Determination (segmentos and niches)
IV. Objectives and Strategies of Marketing Operative Plan
V. Marketing Plan, Control Policies and Evaluation
DIDACTIC ORIENTATION:
Didactic orientation takes into consideration the following teaching activities: Teaching presentation, collaborative
work promotion, marketing plan, structure presentation, advisory on comprehension methods and concepts that
globalize the marketing plan. Learning strategies: Guided readings, documental and virtual research, elaboration
of a marketing plan within hotels, restaurants, tranportation lines, travel agencies, bars, spas, among other types of
enterprises which evidence the knowledge of a marketing plan knowledge.
EVALUATION Y ACCREDITATION:
The evaluation will be continuous, considering the following aspects: written reports, team presentations, concept
maps, debates, Elaboration of a diaporam with the marketing plan contents and the plan presentation.
BIBLIOGRAPHY:
Cohen William A. Plan de mercadotecnia. Editorial Continental. Mxico, 2001. 400 pgs. ISBN 9702405998,
9789702405993
Fernndez Valias, Ricardo. Manual para elaborar un plan de mercadotecnia en la empresa mexicana. Editorial
ECAFSA. Mxico, 2001. 260 pgs. ISBN 9687681810, 9789687681818
MC Daniel, Carlo, J. Gitman, Lawrence. El futuro de los negocios. Editorial Prentice Hall. Mxico, 2007. 788 pgs.
ISBN 9706864784
Kleppner, Otto. Publicidad. 12 edicin. Editorial Prentice Hall. Mxico, 2005. 766 pgs ISBN 9789688801086.
Kotler, Philip; Bowen John; Makens James. Marketing para turismo. 3 edicin. Editorial Pearson Prentice Hall.
Madrid, 2004. 584 pgs. ISBN 8420538957.
PROFESSIONAL ASOCIATED:
LEVEL: V
MODALITY: Presential
CREDITS: 8.0
GENERAL PURPOSE
This learning unit contributes importantly to the graduate students profile, for the graduate student to have the ability to
develop a marketing plan which contributes to the touristic enterprise subsistence, throughout the surrounding
analysis, the detection of needs and determination of strategies to satisfy them in order to achieve the market benefits,
and at the same time, achieving with it, rentability and a healthy growth of the enterprise.
This unit is related in antecedent form with: Metodologa de la investigacin turstica; Investigacin de mercados
tursticos; Comercializacin de productos tursticos; Direccin y administracin de ventas; Planificacin turstica;
Planificacin y desarrollo de productos tursticos; Anlisis del desarrollo de las empresas de turismo en el sector
social y Planificacin y desarrollo de destinos tursticos. It is neither related collaterally with any subject, nor are there
subsecuent subjects.
GENERAL OBJECTIVE
ASSIGNED TIMES
Administracin y Mercadotecnia
THEORY HOURS /WEEK: 3.5
PRACTICE HOURS /WEEK: 1.0
THEORY HOURS/SEMESTER: 6.3
PRACTICE HOURS /SEMESTER:
18.0
TOTAL HOURS /SEMESTER: 81.0
AUTHORIZED BY:
Comisin de Programas
Acadmicos del Consejo
General Consultivo del IPN
REVISED BY:
APPROVED BY:
SHEET:
Plan de mercadotecnia
THEMATIC UNIT:
OF
No.
AD HOURS
TEACHING
ACTIVITIES
(a)
CONTENTS
T
1.1
of
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.4
2.0
1.5
2.0
1.2
1.3
Subtotal
CLAVE
BIBLIOGR
APHICAL
KEY
5.0
10.0
ADDITI
ON
HORAS TAA
Self-learning
Activities
(b)
2B,
13B,14
C,16B
5.0
ADDITI
ON
ADDITION
ADDITION
LEARNING STRATEGIES
Teaching Strategies: Course introduction, team work formation with a inductive method presentation.
Learning strategies: Searching and classification of documental information, concept elaboration and
definitions (conceptual chart), diptych and presentation.
ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING OUTCOMES
Continuous Evaluation:
Information Clasificacin Reporte
Conceptual Table
Diptych
Presentation
15%
25%
35%
25%
10
SHEET:
Plan de Mercadotecnia
THEMTIC UNIT: II
OF
PARTICULAR OBJECTIVE
To Analyze the market sorroundings throughout the FODA method, evidencing it within a practical study
case.
No.
AD HOURS
TEACHING
ACTIVITIES
(a)
CONTENTS
HORAS TAA
Self-learning
Activities
(b)
5.0
5.0
2.1
2.0
2.2
2.0
2.3
2.0
2.4
Environment
and
Surroundings
to
Determine Treaths and Opportunities:
Cultural,
Poltical,
Environmental,
Consuming, Among Others,
2.0
2.5
2.0
Subtotal
10.0
9.0
5.0
ADDITI
ON
ADDITI
ON
ADDITION
CLAVE
BIBLIOGR
APHICAL
KEY
P
4C,7C,
12B
4.0
ADDITION
LEARNING STRATEGIES
Learning Strategies: field research, interviews, survey application, data analysis and interpretation,
practical case study presentation.
Practice: sorroundings and environmental analysis.
Teaching Strategies: presentation, movie projections and facilitator coordination
ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING OUTCOMES
Continuous Evaluation:
Interviews and surveys
20%
Data analysis and interpretation
20%
Field research report
20%
Practice case study presentation
20%
Movie report with conclusions
10%
Practice
10%
10
SHEET:
Plan de mercadotecnia
OF
PARTICULAR OBJECTIVE
To categorize the market by segments, according to its own characteristics, evidencing it within a
comparative market.
AD HOURS
HORAS TAA
TEACHING
Self-learning
CLAVE
BIBLIOGR
ACTIVITIES
Activities
No.
CONTENTS
APHICAL
(a)
(b)
KEY
T
3.1
2.0
3.2
2.0
3.3
2.0
3.4
3.0
3.5
New Manners
Segmentation.
Market
3.0
Subtotal
12.0
of
Touristic
ADDITI
ON
7.0
2B,3B,
7C,8C,
10B,
11C
7.0
ADDITI
ON
ADDITION
ADDITION
LEARNING STRATEGIES
Learning Strategies: Information classification backing up on the existent models (mind map),
searching for accredited documental information,
reports, group presentations (audiovisual
presentations), and comparative chart.
Teaching Strategies: Presentation, facilitators advisory and coordination.
ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING OUTCOMES
Continuous Evaluation:
Mind map
Comparative Chart
Information report
Audiovisual presentation
20%
35%
10%
35%
10
SHEET:
Plan de mercadotecnia
OF
THEMTIC UNIT: IV
2.0
4.2
Market Participation.
3.0
4.3
Product
Service.
/ or Market
3.0
4.4
3.0
4.5
3.0
Subtotal
14.0
Rentability and
ADDITI
ON
9.0
1C,2B,
3B,5C,
6B,9B
14C,
16B
9.0
ADDITI
ON
ADDITION
ADDITION
LEARNING STRATEGIES
Learning Strategies: Operative plan making focussed in the marketing mixture, group presentation of
the BOSTON CONSULTING GROUP model, information analysis and debate.
Teaching Strategies: presentation and advisory.
ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING OUTCOMES
Continuous Evaluation:
Operative plan presentation
Boston model Presentation
Information analysis and debate report
40%
40%
20%
10
SHEET:
OF
Plan de mercadotecnia
THEMTIC UNIT: V
PARTICULAR OBJECTIVE
To make a control and equilibrium catalogue of the marketing plan, evidencing it in a practice study case.
No.
AD HOURS
TEACHING
ACTIVITIES
(a)
CONTENTS
9.0
14.0
17.0
9.0
14.0
ADDITI
ON
ADDITI
ON
ADDITION
5.1
Between
3.0
5.2
3.0
5.3
3.0
5.4
4.0
5.5
4.0
Subtotal
HORAS TAA
Self-learning
Activities
(b)
CLAVE
BIBLIOGR
APHICAL
KEY
P
2B,3B,
10B,11
C,
13B,14
C,15B
ADDITION
LEARNING STRATEGIES
Learning Strategies: information searching and team work.
Practice: Marketing plan catalogue making.
Teaching Strategies: Coordination, supervision and advisory for the policies and control catalogue
making.
ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING OUTCOMES
Continuous Evaluation:
Catalogue presentation and practice writing an executive informative report based on the marketing plan
100%
10
LEARNING UNIT:
SHEET:
Plan de mercadotecnia
OF
10
PRACTICE REGISTER
PRACTICE No.
PRACTICE NAME
THEMATIC
UNITS
TIMING
VENUE
II
9.0
9.0
Subtotal
18.0
TOTAL OF
HOURS
Anotar el
total
de
horas.
SHEET:
Plan de mercadotecnia
ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE
st
1 v Periodo I and II Continuous evaluation 100%
nd
2 Periodo III and IV Continuous evaluation 100%
3rd Periodo V Continuous evaluation 100%
KEY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
OF
10
X
X
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
GENERAL INFORMATION
ACADMIC UNIT:
ACADEMIC
PROGRAM:
Licenciatura en Turismo
LEVEL
FORMATION REA:
ACADEMY:
Institutional
Formation
Basic Scientific
Formation
V
Professional
Formation
LEARNING UNIT:
Administracin y mercadotecnia
Terminal and
Integrative
Formation
Plan de mercadotecnia
LEARNING UNIT OBJETIVE: To design a marketing plan according to the selected tourist Enterprise
requirements.
2.
3. TEACHING PROFILE :
KNOWLEDGE
PROFESSIONAL
EXPERIENCE
in
Marketing, Two-year
experience
Communications, Graphic within
the
martketing
Designe,
Business area.With at least one-year
Administration.
experience teaching in this
area.
ELABORATED BY
Nombre y firma del Presidente de Academia
SKILLS
ATTITUDES
Good
appearance,
responsability, good attitude
to work, good at interpersonal
relationships,
social
compromise,
group
leadership.
REVISED BY
Nombre y firma del Subdirector Acadmico
AUTHORIZED BY
Nombre del Director de la Unidad Acadmica
ACADMIC PROGRAM:
LEARNING UNIT:
LEVEL: IV
theoretical- practical
VALIDITY: 2011
International
LEVEL:V
CREDITS: 6 Tepic 4.1 (SATCA)
AUTHORIZED BY:
Comisin de Programas
Acadmicos del Consejo General
Consultivo del IPN.
Domnguez
Secretario Tcnico de la Comisin
de Programas Acadmicos.
SHEET:
Internacional Scenarios
OF:
10
N THEMATIC UNIT: I
Subtotals:
9.0
11.0
LEARNING STRATEGIES
Documentary research on issues of unity in digital and print media, thereby developing a synoptic table on
globalization. Individually.
Conduct a discussion on globalization of capitalism, highlighting their contributions in a report. Individually.
Development of Practice No.1 "Visit to a Financial Institution". Writing a report individually.
Design a descriptive matrix. Exposing it to the group. Aspects of argument are verified and the strategy used
in the discussion of the descriptive matrix. In teams.
ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING
Synoptic Table.
Compile information relevant to the processes of globalization, regionalization and social integration.
Report of the debate.
Argue the difference of globalization and regionalization processes and social integration.
Practice Report No.1 "Visit to a financial institution."
Note the way in which capital flows reflect in a financial institution.
Matrix descriptive.
Involve the relevant aspects of capital flows.
20%
20%
30%
30%
Internacional Scenarios
SHEET:
OF:
10
N THEMATIC UNIT: II
Subtotals 9.0
LEARNING STRATEGIES
Documentary research on issues of this unit in digital and print media. In teams.
Development of a concept map of the Mexican state structure. Individually.
Development of a comparative matrix about economic, political and social, networks. Individually.
ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING
Synthesis.
20%
Supports the importance of the concepts and functions of businesses and educational institutions,
economic, political and social networks and non-governmental organizations and trade unions.
Concept Map.
20%
Refer Mexican state structure as a business regulator body.
Comparative Matrix.
30%
Break down the difference between economic, political and social networks.
Exposure Report No governmental Organizations and business organizations.
30%
Stresses viable competitive advantages offered by non-governmental organizations and viable business as
references for membership.
SHEET:
Internacional Scenarios
OF:
10
Subtotals
9.0
LITERATURE
KEY
5B
4C
14C
10.0
LEARNING STRATEGIES
Internacional Scenarios
SHEET:
OF:
10
N THEMATIC UNIT: IV
Documentary research in digital and print media on the topics of the unit. Writing an essay with it. In teams.
Round tables discussion on assigned topics of the unit. In teams.
1. Each team will have a different theme
2. They expose the issue and arguments underpinning the conclusions from its theoretical framework.
3. During the discussion, keep a record of group interaction and responses from the assigned topic.
4. A conclusion of the presented topics is delivered in teams each class.
Practice No.3 "Paper Economic Development Impacts"
Simulation of an open forum in which Papers have duration of 20 minutes, where students develop the most
relevant points of the topic assigned by the facilitator.
After the paper, students will have 5 minutes for questions and answers.
The paper should be in English.
Scheduling should be made in a form that the last three classes in a month are designated for such activity,
performing in the auditorium or other place assigned.
The paper is delivered in writing; minimum of 8 pages and power point presentation.
ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING
Essay.
20%
Value judgments about the trends that set international trends, in the introduction, development and conclusion
of the paper.
Report.
30%
Argue the importance of the elements in economic development their harmonious relationship with the
environment.
Practice Report No.3 "Paper Economic Development Impacts"
50%
Evidence of the substantial contribution of the paper, recording the teacher's evaluation on it.
It will be evaluated the originality of the handling of issues in terms of the depth of analysis based on the
objectives that arise at work.
SHEET:
Internacional Scenarios
OF:
10
LIST OF PRACTICES
PRACTICE
No
PRACTICES NAME
THEMATIC UNIT
DURATIN
PLACE OF
PERFORMANCE
10.0
World
Bank
Representation in Mexico
III
10.0
IV
16.0
II
III
Representations of the
Chambers of Commerce
and Sectoral Bodies in
Mexico City.
In
an
Auditorium.
ESCAs
30%
40%
50%
Internacional Scenarios
SHEET:
OF:
10
EVALUATION PROCEDURE
Thematic Unit
Thematic Unit
Thematic Unit
Thematic Unit
I
II
III
IV
Evaluation by previously acquired knowledge towards compliance with the criteria for the first three weeks of
the beginning of the course, and evaluated with documentary research on the proposed topics; an
examination certifying competences to identify functions of the organisms analyzed, the development of
practices based in Units I, III and IV, as well as the design and participation of a simulation on a paper
explaining the operation or characteristics of a international body and harmonious relationship with the
environment.
The learning unit may be studied in other national superior education institutions with agreements with the
IPN.
Mobility between ESCA academic units, according to the attention capacity.
Mobility between modalities, according to the attention capacity.
B
X
Internacional Scenarios
C
10
11
12
13
14
SHEET:
OF:
10
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Appleyard * Field. Economa Internacional. Ed. Mc Graw Hill. Mxico 2005.742 pags.
ISBN: 958-41-0337-7
Berumen Arellano Sergio. Globalizacin. Las Nuevas Perspectivas de las Viejas
Tradiciones. Ed. Taller Abierto. Mxico 2009. 207 pgs. ISBN: 9686148272
Capan, Ergun. Terrorismo y ataques suicidas una perspectiva islmica, Editorial La
Fuente. 2008, 158 pgs. ISBN: 975-278-269-3
Chandeler, Alfred. La mano invisible del mercado.
Ed. ESDA Fondo, Ediciones Belloch, Barcelona, 2008.
Dabat Latrubesse, Alejandro. Globalizacin conocimiento y desarrollo 1. Editorial
Porra, 2009. 602 pgs. ISBN 9786074010046.
Etchegreen, Robert. Las crisis financieras internacionales. Ed. Fondo de cultura
econmica. Mxico, 2008.
Gore, Al. Nuestra eleccin un plan para resolver la crisis climtica, Editorial Ocano
de Mxico, 2010, 416 pgs. ISBN 9786074002799
Luz Flix Tapia, Ricardo De las estrategias contra el terrorismo internacional,
Editorial Porra, 2005, 136 pgs. ISBN 970-07-5306-9.
Mndez Morales Silvestre. Problemas Polticos y Econmicos de Mxico. Ed. Mc
Graw Hill. Mxico 2003. 430 pgs. ISBN: 970-10-3826-6
Peralta Alemn Gilberto. Tendencias del Desarrollo Nacional. Editorial. Esfinge.
Mxico 2002. 303 pgs. ISBN: 970-647-638-5
Powell, Charles T. Democracias occidentales frente al terrorismo global, Editorial
Ariel, 2008, 381 pgs. ISBN 84-344-0005-4.
Rabanel Nuria G., Gonzlez Concepcin, Ortega Pedro. El Entorno Econmico
actual. Editorial Thompson. Mxico 2003. 145 pgs. ISBN: 84-9732-251-7
Requeijo Jaime. Economa mundial. Mac Graw Hill. Mxico 2002.390 pgs. ISBN:
84-481-3324-2
Sotelo Valencia, Adrian. Crisis capitalista y desmedida del valor un enfoque desde 1.
Editorial: Itaca, 2010. 143 pgs. ISBN 9786070017438.
PGINAS WEB:
Secretaras de Estado, Banco de Mxico, Nacional financiera e INEGI.
http://www.uv.mx/oferta/programasuv/default.aspx?mat=ADMK&cur=30003&Program
a=ADMI-03-A-CR/. Octubre 2010.
http://www.uinteramericana.edu/lev2_page.php?p_menu=5_2&num_comunicado=38
3&opc_value=2/ Febrero /2010.
http://calentamientoglobalclima.org/ Octubre 2010
http://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/items/2830.php Octubre 2010
http://www.economia.gob.mx/?P=5200_5208. Octubre 2010
http://oncetv-ipn.net/migrantes/mapas/Octubre 2010
ACADEMIC PROGRAM:
TRAINING AREA:
ACADEMY:
Basic Scientific
LEVEL:
IV
Professional
Terminal and
Integration
LEARNING UNIT:
Regional Blocks
Internacional Scenarios
KNOWLEDGE
In Economics,
International Business.
I.P.N. Educational Model
PROFESSIONAL
EXPERIENCE
TEACHING SKILLS
ATTITUDES
Responsibility.
Punctuality.
Dynamism.
Social commitment.
Tolerance.
Respect.
Take ownership of the
MEI.
ELABORATED
REVISED
AUTHORIZED
DATE:
2011
Foreign Investment
GENERAL PURPOSE
To analyze the norms that rule foreign investment in the national and international levels,
allowing the obtaining of the maximum benefit of an investment and the reduction to a
minimum, the risks involved, through a study case.
CONTENTS:
I. Legal and Institutional regime of foreign investment in the national and international
levels.
II. Legal status of entrepreneurs and foreign investors in Mexico.
III. Commercial activities related to direct and indirect foreign investment.
IV. Procedure for registration on the National Register of foreign investment.
DIDACTIC ORIENTATION:
Constructivism currently rules educational activities this is why the methodology used in
this learning unit is developed under this concept. Thus, the student will construct its own
knowledge and reflect about it, through strategies such as individual documentary
research, synthesis, essays and lectures, where the Professor will assume the role of
moderator, counselor and advisor of the activities developed by the student in the learning
process.
EVALUATION AND ACCREDITATION:
The teacher will apply a written diagnostic evaluation in order to identify the knowledge
that students have respect to the learning unit.
For the accreditation of the learning it will be applied a formative evaluation of each topic,
evaluating the learning strategies implemented in the course, integrating the evidence
portfolio and documentary research reports, analysis reports and resolution of practical
exercises.
It will be applied a summative assessment that consists in solving a practical case that
demonstrates the necessary competencies and skills to develop the analysis of regulations
that rule foreign investment. This learning unit can be accredited by:
Demonstrated competences during the first three weeks of the beginning of the course
and will be evaluated by solving an integrative study case that shows that the student
owns at least 80 % dominion of the core competencies to design strategies applicable to
the analysis and financial evaluation in projects of international marketing of an entity.
to attend other institutions of national or foreign higher education that have agreements
with the IPN.
Mobility between ESCA 'S according to the attention capacity of each unit.
Mobility between school rules according to the attention capacity.
BIBLIOGRAPHY:
Dussel Peters, Enrique (Coordinador). Condiciones y efectos de la inversin extranjera
directa y del proceso de integracin regional en Mxico durante los noventa. Una
perspectiva macro, meso y micro. FE, BID-INTAL, UNAM, Plaza y Valds editores, Mxico
D.F. 2003, pgs. 309, ISBN 970-722-165-8
GENERAL OBJECTIVE:
To apply the tools of the marketing process focused on International Business, for the
analysis of its variables and taking into account the competitive advantages of Mexican
companies through a practical case.
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF CONTENTS:
I. Situational analysis of the market
II -. Strategies of marketing mixture
III -. Design of Strategies to adapt the product in the international market
IV -. Design and strategies of international distribution channels
V. - Integral Communication
DIDACTIC ORIENTATION:
The teaching methodology of this learning unit will focus on cooperative and collaborative
work strategies, including the following activities: exercises, documental bibliographic
research, online and newspaper, summaries, concept maps and the resolution of
questionnaires. Moreover, the teacher shall have the responsibility for the feedback,
supervision and coordination of the learning activities.
Cateora Philip. International Marketing Ed. Mc Graw Hill Interamerican. USA 2008 14
Edition, 744 pags. ISBN: 9780073380988.
Czinkota Michael R., Negocios Internacionales Ed. Thompson, Mxico 2007, 7 edicin,
685 pgs. ISBN: 9789706866103
Keegan J. Warrren. Mercadotecnia Internacional Ed. Pearson. Mxico 2009 5 Edicin,
672 pgs. ISBN 9786074423396
Kotler, Philip. Direccion de Marketing Ed. Pearson. Mxico 2006 12 Edicin, 816 pgs.
ISBN 9702607639
WEB PAGES :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_marketing, noviembre 2009.
http://www.tradeon.com.ar/ayuda/ciclo/AYUDA/marketing/29mercintern.htm, enero 2010.
http://managementhelp.org/ad_prmot/ad_prmot.htm, febrero 2010.
International Scenarios