Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Abstract
Reservoir pressure monitoring during its production life is to
evaluate its performance to ensure the effective extraction of
hydrocarbon from the reservoir. Continuous reservoir
monitoring offers a window of prospects to increase well
productivity, while reducing operating costs through an
improved and more accurate well performance. These are
achieved through analyzing the long term, real time, dynamic
transient pressure obtained from Permanent Down-hole
Gauges (PDG), which will provide input and vital information
for improving the existing reservoir model for flow
simulation.
Reservoir monitoring during field development can amplify
the
understanding
of
the
reservoir
depletion,
compartmentalization, and efficiency of water injection, also
the presence of any flow barriers (such as activated fault). On
this basis, reservoir management can be more accurate and
realistic.
In contrast to the data obtained from the traditional well test
such as DST, pressure data from PDG is large in quantity
(long term up to six years), noisy, multiple phase flow and
multiple rate. The key for the analysis of such data set to
extract reservoir information is to develop a technique in
handling the data, i.e. to make the data analyzable but not
losing the true information contained in the data.
This paper presents techniques using wavelet transform
method for such purpose. These have been developed recently
through an industry sponsored research Project. The
procedures include PDG data visualization, de-noising,
smoothing and break point (due to drop of rate and well
shut-in) identification through analyzing field examples
provided by the sponsors. After this process, transient pressure
SPE 107521
SPE 107521
SPE 107521
Acknowledgement
Authors would like to take this opportunity to thank the
PRIME Project (Petroleum ReservoIr Monitoring and tEsting PRIME Project) sponsors: BG Group, ConocoPhillips and
Wintershall AG for their financial support.
Schlumberger and EPS, Weatherford is acknowledged for
providing softwares to conduct studies within the Project
including this study.
References
Ballinas, J., and Owen, J., Evaluation and Control of Drilling,
Completion and Workover Events with Permanent
Downhole Monitoring: Applications to Maximise Production
and Optimise Reservoir Management paper SPE 74395
presented at the 2002 SPE International Petroleum
Conference and Exhibition of Mexico, Villahermosa, Mexico
10-12th February 2002.
Chiriti, K.E. (PDVSA), Moffatt, T.G. (PROMORE
Engineering Inc) and Bussiere, C. (PROMORE Engineering
Inc), Permanent Downhole Monitoring for Extreme
Temperature and Pressure Environments paper SPE 71593
presented at the 2001 SPE Annual Technical Conference and
Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 30th September 3rd
October 2001.
Chorneyko D. M., ExxonMobil Upstream Research Co.,
Real-Time Reservoir Surveillance Utilizing Permanent
Downhole Pressures - An Operator's Experience, paper
SPE103213 presented at the SPE Annual Technical
Conference and Exhibition, 24-27 September, 2006, San
Antonio, Texas, USA
Frota H.M., SPE, and Destro W., Petrobras, Reliability
Evolution of Permanent Downhole Gauges for Campos
Basin Subsea Wells: A 10-Year Case Study, paper
SPE102700 presented at the SPE Annual Technical
Conference and Exhibition, 24-27 September, 2006, San
Antonio, Texas, USA.
Guan L., L.Li.U.: "Wavelets in petroleum Industry: Past,
Present and Future", Paper SPE 89952.
Haddad, S. (Schlumberger), Proano, E. (Schlumberger) and
Patel, Y. (BP), A Method to Diagnose Depletion, Skin , kh
and Drive Mechanism Effects Using Reservoir Monitoring
Data paper SPE 90032 presented at the 2004 SPE Annual
Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas,
U.S.A., 26-29th September 2004.
Jitendra Kikani, "Multi-resolution Analysis of Long-term
Pressure Transient Data Using Wavelet Methods",
SPE48966.
Mason, J. (Armeda Hess), Laidlaw, J., and Pai, S.
(Schlumberger), Downhole Communications: North Sea
Platform proves Permanent Monitoring Reliability Journal,
Oil and Gas Journal.
Ouyang Liang-Biao, "Improving Permanent Downhole Gauge
(PDG) Data Processing via Wavelet Analysis", SPE 78290
SPE 107521
SPE 107521
Fig.1 A six years transient pressure recorded by a Permanent Down-hole Gauge (PDG). Three main characteristics can be observed: a)
noisy due to rate fluctuations during production, b) large quantity due to high density sampling, and c) long term.
Fig.2 There are two approaches developed in the PRIME Tool Box for PDG data analysis: a) Traditional Approach and, b)
Advanced Approach.
SPE 107521
Fig.3 Field Example A: One month Permanent Down hole Gauge (PDG) data set (about 30,000 data points) from an oilfield in the
North Sea in Cartesian plot, where the vertical axis shows recorded pressure, while the horizontal axis shows the elapsed time. A
series of transient pressure draw downs and build ups are shown as continuous changes due to flowing rate changing or well shut-in.
This data set was chosen to demonstrate the capability of the developed software on processing long term transient pressure data.
Fig.4 Field Example B: This example data set shows the distinct differences from the one shown in Fig.1. The data duration is about
31 hours, which contains about 100,000 data points due to high density sampling from the PDG (down to one data point per second).
This data set was chosen to demonstrate the power of the developed software on data processing such as compression and signal high
frequency analysis.
SPE 107521
Fig.5 The HAAR wavelet was found to be capable of identifying the event in PDG data because the transient pressure signal is step
change, particularly for draw downs and build ups. This is used to decompose the original data into signals at different frequencies
(higher or lower). The values of the high frequency signals (positive or negative) are used to detect event. The figure shows the
decomposition analysis of the filed example B, where S is the original signal, a3 is low frequency signal, while d3, d2, and d1 are
frequencies at three levels (lower to higher).
SPE 107521
Fig.6 The HAAR wavelet was used for processing the PDG data from the field example A. This figure shows the decomposed signals
after the wavelet treatment, together with the original PDG data, where S is the original signal, a3 is low frequency signal, while d3, d2,
and d1 are frequencies at three levels (lower to higher).
10
SPE 107521
Fig.7 This figure shows the original PDG data from field example A, together with the chosen high frequency component at a proper
level after processing. The blue line is the original transient pressure and, the red line is the high frequency of the original transient
pressure data at the chosen level.
Fig.8 By examine the high frequency, any events during the production history can be detected as a sharp change. The value of the
high frequency at the point, where a sharp change occurred is used to distinguish different types of events, such as pressure draw
downs and build ups. When the value of high frequency is positive, the pressure DD happens, while the values are negative, the
pressure BU happens. This figure shows the DDs and BUs identified using this method from field example A (part of the data set).
SPE 107521
11
Fig.9 This figure shows outlier, the DDs and BUs due to drop of rate as well as well shut-in identified using HAAR wavelet
processing method for field example B, where the contrast between frequencies due to rate changes and those during DDs and BUs
makes it very easy to distinguish the events.
Fig.10 This figure shows the power of the algorithm used in PRIME Tool Box for PDG data compression, demonstrated by field
example B. The original signal has 111,702 points. The data points after the compression are only 1033, while the true response of the
original data retained. The compression coefficient for this example is 100. The used algorithm also considered the nonuniform
sampling characteristics, particularly for transient pressure data.
12
SPE 107521
Fig.11 This figure shows three BU data sets after wavelet processing from field example B: a) original data before compression (solid
blue dot), b) compressed signal (red circle) and, c) further smoothed signal (dotted green diamond). Apparently further smoothed
signal can best represent the measured transient pressure BU.
Fig.12 shows the pressure derivative log-log plot of the original BU data from Fig.11, before wavelet processing and data
compression, from which one can hardly identify any flow regimes from the calculated derivatives, but just see a heap of the crowded
data points with no trend.
SPE 107521
13
Fig.13 shows the log-log diagnostic plot of the BU from Fig.12, after wavelet processing, compression and further smoothing, from
which the well bore storage, reservoir radial flow, possible some outer boundary effects are all distinguishable. This further proved
that the developed data smoothing function used in PRIME Tool Box is working well.
Fig.14 After the wavelet data processing, compression and further smoothing, quality pressure DDs and BUs can be exported, then
analyzed using PanSystem to derive reservoir effective permeabilities and skin factors in a time lapsed fashion. These are then plotted
against the elapsed time to reflect the dynamic changes of these properties during the selected time window (field example B).
14
SPE 107521
Fig.15 After the wavelet data processing, compression and further smoothing, quality pressure DDs and BUs can be exported, then
analyzed using PanSystem to derive reservoir effective permeabilities and skin factors in a time lapsed fashion. These are then plotted
against the elapsed time to reflect the dynamic changes of these properties during the selected time window (field example A).