Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
6, JUNE 2014
2891
I. INTRODUCTION
0018-926X 2014 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission.
See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
2892
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, VOL. 62, NO. 6, JUNE 2014
2893
Fig. 4. (a) Top view of prototyped slot antenna, (b) bottom view of prototyped
slot antenna, and (c) prototyped metasurface.
axial ratio (AR) are carried out on the proposed PRMS antenna
with LHCP. The results are shown in Fig. 5 where the green
lines show the AR of the proposed PRMS antenna using the
parameters of Table I. It can be seen that the proposed PRMS
antenna has a AR bandwidth (ARBW) for
dB from 3.3
to 3.7 GHz, two dips of 0.9 and 0.5 dB at 3.4 and 3.65 GHz,
respectively, and a peak of 1.7 dB at 3.53 GHz between the two
dips.
As decreases from 20 mm to 18.5 mm, Fig. 5(a) shows
that the high- and low-frequency dips shift up from 3.18 and
3.56 GHz to 3.4 and 3.65 GHz, respectively, with the frequency
spacing between the two dips reduced from 380 to 250 MHz.
The peak between two dips shifts from 3.4 to 3.53 GHz with
amplitude dropped from 4.7 to 1.7 dB, respectively, resulting
in a large ARBW of 400 MHz. When decreases further to
17 mm, the two dips merge together with a minimum AR of
0.7 dB at 3.68 GHz. The antenna has an AR frequency band (for
dB) from 3.5 to 3.82 GHz, with the ARBW reduced
to 320 MHz. Thus, the parameter can be used to adjust the
frequency band of AR. Fig. 5(b) shows the AR with different
values of . It can be seen that as increases from 4.6 mm to
5, 5.3, and 5.6 mm, the AR at the frequency of 3.5 GHz drops
continuously. The two dips of AR move towards each other and
thus the ARBW reduces. When continues to increase to 6 mm,
the two dips merge together with a minimum AR of 1.2 dB at
around 3.5 GHz. Note that as changes, the frequency band for
dB is not changed much, with the center frequency
remained at about 3.5 GHz, unlike the case of changing in
Fig. 5(a). Thus the parameter can be used to slightly tradeoff
the value of AR against ARBW. The AR with different values of
is shown in Fig. 5(c). It can be seen that has the similar effects
to , but in an opposite way. When increases from 0.5 mm to
0.75, 1 and 1.5 mm, the two dips in AR move towards each other
and the peak between them drops. The ARBW decreases with
2894
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, VOL. 62, NO. 6, JUNE 2014
and
will lead
by 90 and the resultant -field through the MS
will be LHCP and rotating in the clockwise direction as indicated by the yellow arrowed arc in Fig. 6(b). To reconfigure the
antenna to RHCP, we can simply rotate the MS by
, so
that the value of
in (3) becomes larger and
will lead
by 90 instead. When the rotation angle is
or 135 ,
the unit cell is symmetrical along the and axes as shown in
Fig. 7. Thus, both
and
see an identical impedance and
so have the same amplitude and phase after going through the
MS. The PRMS antenna remains LP.
IV. SIMULATION AND MEASUREMENT RESULTS
A. Reflection Coefficient S11
The final design of proposed PRMS antenna has been studied
using computer simulation and measurement. The simulated
and (b)
, (b)
, (c)
2895
purity. Fig. 11(b) and (d) show that when the MS is rotated to
and 135 , (i.e., the PRMS antenna is LP), the realized
boresight gains are higher than 7.5 and 6 dBi, respectively,
2896
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, VOL. 62, NO. 6, JUNE 2014
Fig. 10. Simulated and measured efficiencies for different rotation angles.
D. Radiation Pattern
The simulated and measured radiation patterns of the PRMS
antenna at 3.5 GHz for different
are shown in Fig. 12. For
2897
are all large than 12 dB. For the radiation patterns in LP shown
in Fig. 12(c), (d), (g) and (h), the FBRs are larger than 15 dB,
where the cross-polarizations are too small to be shown and so
omitted. The results in Fig. 12 show that the MS receives the LP
signal from the source slot antenna and reradiates the signal in
CP (
or 90 ) or LP (
or 135 ) to the other side
in the opposite direction (along
axis as shown in Fig. 1).
V. CONCLUSIONS
A PRMS antenna designed using a slot antenna and a MS has
been presented. The polarization of the antenna can be mechanically reconfigured to LHCP, RHCP and LP by rotating the MS
around the center with respect to the slot. The polarization-reconfigurable property has been analyzed and explained using an
equivalent circuit. The simulated and measured performances in
terms of polarization reconfigurability, efficiency, gain and radiation pattern, have been presented. Results have shown that the
polarization reconfiguration can be achieved at around 3.5 GHz
with a fractional operating bandwidth 11.4%.
REFERENCES
Fig. 12. Simulated and measured radiation patterns at 3.5 GHz for different
. (a)
-plane; (b)
yz-plane; (c)
-plane;
yz-plane; (e)
-plane; (f)
-plane; (g)
(d)
xz-plane; (h)
-plane.
[1] D. Peroulis, K. Sarabandi, and L. P. B. Katehi, Design of reconfigurable slot antennas, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 53, no. 2,
pp. 645654, Feb. 2005.
[2] R. L. Haupt and M. Lanagan, Reconfigurable antennas, IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag., vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 4961, Feb. 2013.
[3] O. H. Karabey, S. Bildik, S. Bausch, S. Strunck, A. Gaebler, and
R. Jakoby, Continuously polarization agile antenna by using liquid
crystal-based tunable variable delay lines, IEEE Trans. Antennas
Propag., vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 7076, Jan. 2013.
[4] T. J. Jung, I. J. Hyeon, C. W. Baek, and S. Lim, Circular/linear polarization reconfigurable antenna on simplified RF-MEMS packaging
platform in K-band, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 60, no. 11,
pp. 50395045, Nov. 2012.
[5] Y. J. Sung, T. U. Jang, and Y. S. Kim, A reconfigurable microstrip
antenna for switchable polarization, IEEE Microw. Wireless Compon.
Lett., vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 534536, Nov. 2004.
[6] H. Aissat, L. Cirio, M. Grzeskowiak, J. M. Laheurte, and O. Picon,
Reconfigurable circularly polarized antenna for short-range communication systems, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 54, no. 6,
pp. 28562863, Jun. 2006.
[7] W. Yi-Fan, W. Chun-Hsien, D. Y. Lai, and C. Fu-Chiarng, A reconfigurable quadri-polarization diversity aperture-coupled patch antenna,
IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 10091012, Mar.
2007.
[8] K. Boyon, P. Bo, S. Nikolaou, K. Young-Sik, J. Papapolymerou, and M.
M. Tentzeris, A novel single-feed circular microstrip antenna with reconfigurable polarization capability, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.,
vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 630638, Mar. 2008.
[9] C. Rui-Hung and R. Jeen-Sheen, Single-fed microstrip patch antenna
with switchable polarization, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 56,
no. 4, pp. 922926, Apr. 2008.
[10] W. M. Dorsey, A. I. Zaghloul, and M. G. Parent, Perturbed square-ring
slot antenna with reconfigurable polarization, IEEE Antennas Wireless
Propag. Lett., vol. 8, pp. 603606, 2009.
[11] A. Khaleghi and M. Kamyab, Reconfigurable single port antenna with
circular polarization diversity, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 57,
no. 2, pp. 555559, Feb. 2009.
[12] Q. Pei-Yuan, A. R. Weily, Y. J. Guo, and L. Chang-Hong, Polarization
reconfigurable U-slot patch antenna, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.,
vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 33833388, Oct. 2010.
[13] S. Youngje, Investigation into the polarization of asymmetrical- feed
triangular microstrip antennas and its application to reconfigurable antennas, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 10391046,
Apr. 2010.
[14] A. G. Besoli and F. De Flaviis, A multifunctional reconfigurable pixeled antenna using MEMS technology on printed circuit board, IEEE
Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 44134424, Dec. 2011.
2898
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, VOL. 62, NO. 6, JUNE 2014