Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
675
676
Harvest
Height to
base of ear
(cm)
index
(%) i
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Variety*
Little Joss
Holdfastf
Cappelle-Desprez
Maris Widgeonf
Maris Huntsman
HobbitJ
MardlerJ
370/500J
730/3637$
989/10J
Armada
Benoist 10483
S.E.
Mean
Camp
Paternoster
Field
Field
Camp
Field
]Paternoster
Field
Camp
Field
5-22
4-96
5-86
5-68
6-54
7-30
6-21
6-34
7-07
7-57
6-86
7-23
112
98
87
96
86
64
57
61
60
64
76
67
142
126
110
127
106
80
77
78
78
84
97
87
34
34
42
39
46
50
47
49
50
49
45
45
36
011
013
0-9
1-3
0-5
0-9
3-96
640
77
99
44
44
Year of
Paternoster
Field
introduction
330
1908
2-91
1935
3-74
1953
3-57
1964
4-04
1972
4-63
1977
4'07
1978
4-25
4-35
4-59
1978
4-24
3-80
36
42
39
46
48
49
48
48
51
43
48
* The numbers 370/500, etc., refer to advanced breeding lines from the winter wheat breeding programme of
the Plant Breeding Institute. The numbers 1-12 are used to identify the varieties in Figs 4 and 5.
f These varieties are of breadmaking quality,
j Homozygous for the major dwarfing gene Rht2.
677
RESULTS
678
Maximum number
of
shoots/m2
Variety
Little Joss
Holdfast
Cappelle -Desprez
Maris Widgeon
Maris Huntsman
Hobbit
Mardler
370/500
730/3637
989/10
Armada
Benoist 10483
S.E.
Mean
Paternoster
Field
870
865
664
637
673
598
700
741
584
745
558
Camp
Field
1114
1200
50
925
922
947
794
821
837
922
813
753
1172
35
701
937
773
No. of ears/m 2
Survival of
shoots (%)
Paternoster
Field
Camp
Field
Paternoster
Field
Camp
Field
296
346
279
274
249
257
308
289
257
283
296
366
468
435
415
379
429
386
385
424
366
535
34
40
42
43
37
43
44
39
32
39
47
45
40
54
47
46
46
45
71
379
715
49
61
15
22
292
442
42
48
44
38
53
679
Table 3. Leaf area indices on 22-23 May, dates of anthesis and loss of dry matter from
vegetative organs between anthesis and maturity for 12 varieties in two fields
22-22(May
Variety
Little Joss
Holdfast
Cappolle-Desprez
Maris Widgeon
Maria Huntsman
Hobbit
Mardler
370/500
730/3637
989/10
Armada
Benoist 10483
Paternoster
Field
3-55
2-67
Camp
Field
6-90
307
310
313
304
7-37
664
810
818
3-32
3-65
6-27
7-64
8-84
307
814
2-82
5-88
7-58
7-46
0-68
7-42
312
314
S.E.
0-20
Mean
314
Date of anthesis
(date in June)
Paternoster Camp
Field
Field
15
12
12
12
11
9
9
10
11
10
9
4
20
19
18
17
16
12
12
13
17
13
12
7
10-3
14-7
Camp
Field
146
59
91
79
156
160
235
136
168
173
58
143
109
83
172
156
200
158
137
140
253
203
166
227
30
46
134
167
680
6. viii
7. vii
17. vii
27. vii
Date
Fig. 1. Time course of changes in crop components in two fields, (a) and (6): leaf area index; (c) and
(d): grain dry weight. Lines represent four varieties: Little Joss (), Maris Huntsman (), 989/10 (A),
and Benoist 10483 ( ) . The first point on each line is the value of the given component at anthesis. (a)
and (c) Paternoster Field, (6) and (d) Camp Field.
7.vi
681
9. vi
19. vi
29. vi
9. vii
Date
19. vii
29. vii
800
7. vi
17. vi
27. vi
7. vii
17. vii
27. vii
6. viii
16. viii
682
600
400 -
200 -
-200
10
20
30
40
Days after anthesis
50
60
70
30
40
Days after anthesis
50
60
70
-200
683
Table 4. Less in dry weight of various organs from the four oldest and from four newer, semi-dwarf varieties,
between the time of attainment of maximum weight of the vegetative organs and maturity
Paternoster Field
All
vegetative
organs
Oldest varieties
Semi-dwarf varieties
S.E.
Camp Field
Stems
All
Ear
Leaf
vegetative
sheaths laminae structures organs
Loss in dry weight (g/m2
and
266
275
227
220
25
35
23
19
14
20
2
Stems
and
sheaths
Ear
Leaf
laminae structures
314
344
227
220
56
71
53
55
30
18
16
17
19
Loss in dry weight as a percentage of the' total loss from the vegetative organs
Oldest varieties
Semi-dwarf varieties
85
81
9
9
5
10
65
65
Loss in dry weight of the organs as a percentage of their weight at the time of maximum vegetative weight
Oldest varieties
32
36
25
14
26
24
30
33
Semi-dwarf varieties
35
41
22
23
32
33
34
28
accumulation, though it appeared that these reflected dates of anthesis, the earlier varieties
ceasing grain growth sooner than the later ones.
Growth curves of the grains in the first, second
and third florets of the central spikelets of the ears
showed that in these grains there were varietal
differences in growth rates in both fields (see Fig.
3 for examples). The grains in florets 1 and 2 had
the fastest average growth rate. The mean rates
of growth of the grains in the three florets were
similar in the two fields. In both fields, averaging
over florets, Maris Huntsman and 989/10 had the
fastest rates, and Holdfast, Mardler and Benoist
10483 the slowest rates. When the mean rates of
growth of the grains in florets 13 of the central
spikelets were multiplied by the number of grains/
ma, the resulting rates of growth in g/m 2 /day were
strongly correlated with the rates estimated from
whole-ear data. Although the sampling frequency
was insufficient to quantify varietal differences in
the duration of grain growth, the curves given in
Fig. 3, as well as those for the other varieties,
indicate that the duration was less in Little Joss
and Holdfast than in most modern varieties.
684
10
20
30
40
Days after anthesis
10
20
30
40
Days after anthesis
SO
60
70
60
70
Fig. 3. Time course of changes in mean grain dry weight in floret 1 for four varieties: Little Joss (#),
Maris Huntsman (), 989/10 (A) and Benoist 10483 (), in two fields: (a) Paternoster Field, (6) Camp
Field, S.E. of a value is 6%.
final, bore a reasonably close, though not proportional, relation to stem height. Stem weight per
unit height was greater in Paternoster than in
Camp Field. Reduction in stem height by one half,
the varietal range, was accompanied by a reduction
in stem weight by about one third. The loss in
stem weight from the time of maximum vegetative
dry weight bore no relation with height. Harvest
index (the ratio of grain yield to grain + straw
yield at maturity) varied from 34-36 % for Little
Joss and Holdfast to 48-51% for 989/10 and
685
500 -
500
300
350
400
450
Grain yield in Paternoster Field (g/m2)
Fig. 4. Yields of varieties in Camp Field plotted against those in Paternoster Field. The numbers
refer to those alongside the variety names in Table 1. iji, S.E. of a value.
Variety
Little Joss
Holdfast
Cappelle-Desprez
Maris Widgeon
Maris Huntsman
Hobbit
Mardler
370/500
730/3637
989/10
Armada
Benoist 10483
S.E.
Mean
Paternoster
Field
370
31-9
48-1
45-7
461
461
41-8
43-6
394
48<3
40-3
37-7
0-7
42-2*
No. of grains/spikelet
in central spikelets
No. o)
grains/ear
Mean grain
weight (mg)
Camp
Field
38-8
32-6
44-8
451
47'7
36-9
38-2
43-2
41-9
47-5
37-8
364
11
40-9
Paternoster
Field
Camp
Field
Paternoster
Field
30 1
26-4
27-9
28-5
35-2
391
31-6
33-8
42-9
33-6
35-5
26-6
0-6
32-7
36-8
2-31
2-35
2-39
2-52
305
307
2-85
305
3-26
301
2-67
2-69
Camp
Field
2-77
2-59
2-50
2-61
304
3-59
3-36
316
291
3-52
2-66
2-72
009
2-77
008
2-95
32-5
301
30-3
36-2
461
421
381
398
43 6
339
27-8
0-9
36-5
686
Camp
Field
Paternoster
Field
6-4
60
6-8
6-5
6-8
71
6-6
74
75
77
78
79
79
78
82
71
82
78
71
72
7-2
161
190
18-3
18-3
180
19-8
171
171
200
20-1
20-4
21-5
Field
71
69
68
68
72
72
71
S.E.
0-27
Mean
6-8
Variety
Little Joss
Holdfast
Cappelle-Desprez
Maris Widgeon
Maris Huntsman
Hobbit
Mardler
370/500
730/3637
989/10
7-2
6-7
70
7-5
Armada
Benoist 10483
<% N i n
grain
Nitrogen
harvest index (%)
Camp
Paternoster
Field
Camp
Field
1-44
1-54
1-40
1-42
1-32
1-21
1-27
1-39
1-26
119
1-44
1-52
2-20
2-64
213
2-18
1-98
1-95
1-97
1-92
200
1-90
201
81
67
063
80
73
005
006
18-8
78
71
136
2-09
2-18
687
".
7 "
4 600 -
n 12
11
8
3
x:
eo
'\"4
'" 1
I 500 -
10
ft'
I 400.
2
-i-H
300
1
200 -
400
500
600
700
800
Straw dry weight (g/m2)
900
1000
Fig. 5. Grain dry weight plotted against straw dry weight at maturity for Camp Field ( ) and Paternoster
Field (#). The lines show a slope of 1-0. The numbers refer to those alongside the variety names in
Table 1. | - i J-l, S.E. of a value.
688
689
B. E. (1976). Some effects of leaf posture on photosynthesis and yield in wheat. Annals of Applied
Biology 83, 425-446.
AUSTIN, R. B. & JONES, H. G. (1975). The physiology
genes and breeding for yield in bread wheat. Zeitschrift fiir Pflanzenziichtung 76, 102-112.
PATRICK, J. W. (1972). Distribution of assimilate
during stem elongation in wheat. Australian Journal
of Biological Sciences 25, 455-467.
ACS 94