SPECIAL ACADEMIC EDITION

Montauk Pulse

THE

A CHRONICLE OF TIME

A newsletter of events and

circumstances concerning
The Montauk Project

SUMMER 2015
SPECIAL EDITION

DR. DAVID ANDERSONS TECHNOLOGY EXPLAINED

LIGHT CONES AND CLOSED TIMELIKE CURVES
x (time)

Copyright 2015
by Peter Moon and Dr. David Anderson
The following article is intended for academic and educational use worldwide and may be broadly distributed
as long as the authors are acknowledged and credited.

The purpose of this special edition of the Montauk Pulse

newsletter (see back page for explanation and context of

this publication) is to give a simplistic overview of the
mechanics of time control technology and to demonstrate
that the proposition of time travel does not violate the basic
laws of physics and mathematics; and further, that these
laws support the idea.
As this is written, time control technology has been
developed with varying degrees of success by different
governments on the planet, and it, along with censorship of
technology in general, is a prime defensive and offensive
imperative with regard to the survival of nations. It is in
the interest of the general public to learn and understand
the undeniable plausibility and potential of this technology
in order to advocate full disclosure and minimize abuse of
this technology.
What is written here is based upon decades of research
and breakthroughs by Dr. David Anderson who has patented a time reactor that literally manipulates time itself.
In order to understand how time travel or movement through space-time occurs, imagine yourself in a
science fiction story (the holodeck in Star Trek: The Next
Generation being one example) where time has stopped
and everything is literally frozen in time. In this scenario, however, is a character who is witnessing it but is
not similarly frozen. In other words, he can move around
and stick his tongue out at the various characters or do
whatever he wants to do. While it is self-evident that this
scenario can be referenced on a graph with various grid
lines and axes (used as the plural of axis here), it is too
unwieldy to render this three-dimensionally; so, for the
sake of simplicity, we will use a 2-D grid to explain how

y (space)
time control works. The x axis above represents time and
the y axis represents space.* In the frozen scenario above,
all people and objects are virtually still (or moving infinitely slow) in regards to space (the y axis) and time (the x
axis). When time is unfrozen, everything moves along the
vertical x time axis. As space-time are inextricably woven
together, there is a natural harmony between these two
expressions of experience. Each, however, is a different
aspect that can operate with different ratios of movement
to each other, just like slowing film down for slow-motion.
Dr. Andersons time reactor technology is based upon
either accelerating or decelerating time in a self-contained
field by stimulating a chemical reagent (which I have
identified as a noble gas) within a field of lasers containing extensive sensors and inducing a low-grade rotating
electromagnetic field.** This self-contained field is similar
to the electromagnetic bottle effect utilized in the Philadelphia Experiment, but it is being done by different and
safer means.
It is a principle of time control that when you either
accelerate or decelerate an object or person (with a time
reactor), this virtual bottle or bubble is no longer moving in synchronization with reference to the vertical time
line depicted above. For graphing purposes, the bubble
can be referred to as a particle that is moving away from
or veering off from the x axis. No matter what dimensions
(continued on page 2)
*

Rendering 3-D circumstances with a 2-D grid is no different than what

a surveyor or architect do when they create a blueprint for a house.
**

The prospect of how time acceleration or deceleration can be

achieved was discussed in the Winter 2010 and Summer 2013 issues
of the Pulse as well as the appendix of Transylvanian Moonrise.

Light Cones... (continued from page 1)

We will now take all of this one step further by introducing the concept of a light cone. If you look up the standard
physics definition of a light cone, you are likely to become
very confused if only because what is presented is not presented in a simple fashion. They do not do a good job of
explaining it to laymen, and if they were not confused about it
themselves, they would already have brought this technology
into the world. To make this as simple as possible, and to
give you a more subjective understanding of how time and
time control work, let us revisit our space-time axis again.

(including multiple dimenx (time)

sions) it traverses, it is referred to as the worldline in
worldline
modern physics. See right.
y (space)
If we reference the
veering off of the time axis
back to the frozen time scenario, the character subject
to time manipulation will
be in a virtual bubble or containment field that is no longer
moving in synch with the now unfrozen characters moving
along the x axis in regular time. Additionally, this character
in the bubble is literally moving AWAY from the time axis in
a geometric sense, but it is important to emphasize that the
only reason he can veer off the time axis is because spacetime is being bent; and more specifically, the space-time that
he is occupying. This is representative of the Doppler Effect
(or Doppler shift) which refers to the change in frequency of
a wave (or other periodic event) for an observer moving relative to its source. It is important to highlight the statement
there is a difference in frequency with regard to an object/
person in a time acceleration bubble. Just as a train appears
to be louder when it comes closer to an observer, so is there
an observable difference when something veers off of the
time line. Eventually, this results in an observable invisibility
of the person/object in the bubble. This is also what would
happen to a character in the previous sci-fi scenario subject
to time acceleration. He would be invisible.
The Doppler Effect in the above scenario is created by
the time reactor which is facilitating a curvature or literal
bending of space-time. The curvature of the time-warp
field or time bubble is the focal point of the boundary layer
between fields. [NOTE: It was the lack of control of such
a boundary layer which compromised the sailors involved
in the Philadelphia Experiment].
In summary, an object subject to time acceleration will
veer off of the time line to the point where it will disappear. There is, however, another factor involved and that
is the prospect that you can also cause something to veer
off by reason of time deceleration. This can cause the trajectory of the object to wiggle back and forth to and from
the time (x) axis (see right).
The act(s) of going back and
x (time)
forth with either acceleration
or deceleration is changing
the relationship between the
y (space)
worldline experience of the
object; and, in particular, its
continuing relationship to the
time axis.

x (time)
a

y (space)

one light-second
b
c

one second

In the above diagram, the distance from the center of

the cross (point o) to point a is arbitrarily designated as
one second of time along the time axis. The distance from
point c to point b is identical. As we are not seeking to
expand our paradigm beyond the speed of light, we designate
the distance from the center of the cross point o to point
c (the same distance as point a to point b) as one light
second. As this is referring to the space axis, this is the same
as saying 300,000 kilometers (the distance light will travel in
one second based upon the speed of light). Our diagram now
features a square. Point b represents the time and space it
would taken for a unit of light to move in one second from
the center of the cross or axes. If we draw a line from b
to the center, we have the hypotenuse of a right triangle and
this automatically tells us that the angle of the line is 45.
This line represents the actual speed of light. See below.

x (time)
b
y (space)

hypotenuse at
45 angle

We have not chosen to entertain scenarios that exceed the

speed of light. Therefore, if we are positioned at the center
of the axes or cross, we cannot veer off the time axis more
than 45 on either side. This is the basis for conceiving of
what is called a light cone. See the following diagram.
(continued on page 3
2

Light Cones... (continued from page 2)

In the scenario where surpassing light speed is not allowed, one cannot move out of the 45 restriction within the
realm of the light cone(s). There is, however, at least one
principle which makes this a moot point and enables time
travel to occur at sub-light speed. This has to do with the
scientific principle that space-time is curved. You might
have heard of Einsteins precept that if you travelled long
enough in a straight line that you would eventually return
to the point of origin. This is no different than the concept
of an ourobourus, a snake eating its tail. This curvature of
space-time, however, has other implications. If you look at
the previous diagrams and visualize a particle veering off the
time axis, it will never be able to cross the 45 angle. BUT,
if you can tip the light cone itself from its original path (this
is in addition to any trajectory it might be experiencing as a
result of independent time acceleration/deceleration) through
gravitational* (or some other) force exerted upon it, this will
manifest as a series of light cones. If the light cones are tilted
sufficiently and on a continuing basis, it is readily observable
that their path can return to a point in the past.

light cones
in 2-D
format

Note that if you place yourself at the original center

point of where the axes (axes is the plural of axis) stand or
stood, you have a light cone in front of you (representing
the future) and another behind you (representing the past).
To be more accurate, this two-dimensional format can be
extrapolated into three dimensions where what appear as
light vectors in the 2-D illustration above would manifest
as funnels or cones of light in 3-D. If we start at the center
and move upward (as far as the diagrams are concerned), we
can never move more than 45 away from the vertical time
axis providing we do not exceed the speed of light. Under
t
such conditions, this means that all worldlines (experience (time axis)
of particles) can never leave the bounds of the light cone.
Keep in mind, however, that this is a purely mathematical
framework and what we know as the past or history is simply
a reverse direction. It also means, however, that movement
into the past cannot exceed the speed of light. See below.

t
(time axis)
Here-Now

all potential
future events
y
(space axis)
y (space axis)

all potential
past events
In the above diagram, the very center is designated as
Here-Now. The inside of the upper cone is designated as
the future of Here-Now which includes all possible futures
within the speed of light reference frame. The bottom cone
includes the entirety of the past of Here-Now.
It is very important to grasp the idea that every point in
space-time is represented as having its own light cone and
that includes different potentialities every step of the way.
We are breaking down reality in this way to what might be
conceived of as digital space wherein virtually every spot
in space is like a pixel on a video screen and each with its
own set of light cones.

This circular path of light cones, by the way, are what

is known as a Closed Timelike Curve, a conceptual theory
introduced by Kurt Gdel in the 1940s. This is somewhat
of a catch word that people bandy about and do not truly
understand. While it is a wormhole-like pathway to the
past at sub-light speed, the model above, as it stands, does
not really allow for time travel to the past that is prior to the
original formation of the curved space-time. This objective,
(continued on page 4)
*

The prospect that gravity can actually bend space-time was a part of
Einsteins General Theory of Relativity that was actually demonstrated
to be true and is accepted as a scientific fact.

Light Cones... (continued from page 3)

physics (outside of secret projects such as the Philadelphia

Experiment) had that this might be possible was in 1974
when Dr. Frank Tipler offered a theoretical system by which
light cones could be tipped. His theory included the prospect
that a piece of matter ten times the mass of the sun could be
compressed into a long and thin super-dense cylinder and
rotated at a speed at least half light speed. The distortion
in space-time would create gravity through the principle of
centrifugal force and thereby tip the light clones. This model
was admired by physicists as it does not violate science. It
also creates closed timelike curves and allows for all sorts
of travel between points in the past and the future. While
Tiplers model holds up to scientific theory, it is neither
pragmatic nor feasible. David has taken an approach that
does not require the impractical logistical requirements of
Tiplers model.
While it is a given that gravity is indeed a scientifically
recognized means of bending space-time, I have taken notice
that the word gravity does not appear in either the patent
or description of the Anderson Time ReactorTM. David has
always stated that gravity is a label we put on something we
do not understand. More relevant is the fact that gravity
is curved space-time in action. In other words, the very
act of curving space-time is a senior or causation factor with
regard to gravity. Just as gravity is created by a whirling
cylinder of centrifugal force, so can such a force be created
by curving space-time. As the literal fabric of space-time
is being grabbed or twisted, not unlike a loose sock being
scooped up by the rotating brush of a vacuum cleaner, this
process is referred to as inertial frame dragging (which
also has more complicated explanations attached to it). By
coupling two different areas of slightly twisted space-time, it
accesses or creates extremely high energy. The discovery of
this phenomena was a remarkable breakthrough and David
has coined a name for this energy: space-time motive force.
If one has any doubts about the veracity of this, they can
watch his videos on youTube entitled:

however, can be achieved by bending the time axis excessively so that the worldline of the light cones is emulating
an ouroboros to the point where the snake is moving to
a point that is beneath the space axis or, more specifically,
where the space axis once was. If you look at the illustration below which begins with the original space-time axis,
I have turned it 45 and then did this repeatedly (for a total
of five times inclusive) in order to demonstrate that bending
space-time in such a manner allows for the worldline (represented by the continuous outer line below) to turn back to
a point that is earlier than the point below designated as the
original space-time axis. This is travelling into the past
(ti

m t
ea
xi

s)

t
(time axis)

45

45

(s

pa

ce

ax

y (space axis)

is)

y
)

(tim

ce

pa

(s

original space-time axis

xis

ea
)

y (space axis)
y

ce

pa

(s

is)

ax

worldline (continuous)

t
(time axis)
)

xis

ea

(tim

and to a past that is previous to the original point where the

path of our light cones began. Depending upon the manner
in which these bends of space-time have been engineered,
it could take one to the ancient past.
In the scenario laid out above, we have an object (within
a field) that is subjected to time acceleration (represented by
the continuous worldline) that is additionally or simultaneously being subjected to a continuous series of events where
time is being bent. This can described as a Closed Timelike
Curve within or subjected to another Closed Timelike Curve;
and it is by this procedure that one can travel to a point prior
to when your time machine was created. This is bending
time within time that is already being bent.
What I have laid out above is pure theory; and while
it is a sound theory, it is meaningless unless it can actually
be engineered into reality. The first clue that conventional

Harvesting Space-Time Motive Force, Part I

(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-OPgr7eXF0) and
Harvesting Space-Time Motive Force, Part II
(www.youtube.com/watch?v=-OwkV_BSrsw).
This was a remarkable breakthrough of Davids that
has been unheralded and under appreciated by the world
(although this might be to his own advantage up to this
point). A properly constructed time reactor could supply the
entire world with all the energy it needs (the videos explain
this). The entire process would also be very inexpensive in
comparison to other solutions. Even more spectacular than
this relatively cheap means of energy, however, is the fact

(continued on page 5)

Light Cones......(continued from page 4)

more risk-oriented endeavor than what David is doing.

Preston also stated that the researchers who studied the
Philadelphia Experiment determined that the sailors lost
their time references and lost their minds when they were
subjected to the electromagnetic bottle and that the solution
was to pump in a fake or virtual reality into the bottle so that
time travellers would not go crazy. This prospect, whether
true or not, was the justification used for the mind-control
technology that was developed. Thus far, we have heard
no indication that those subject to Davids technology have
had any need for a fake reality to be pumped into the selfcontained field. The way he has approached the subject does
not seem to necessitate any need for mind control, but he does
state that we cannot separate time from human consciousness
and that observation of past times will affect reality. Security
is also an issue in these matters and that includes enforced
censorship and all that might come with it.
A sensitive point with all of these endeavors has been
the so-called boundary layer between one self-contained
field and another. When it is unstable, dangerous radiation
or radiation-like phenomena occurs that will literally scorch
or destroy whatever is in the boundary and not within the
bounds of the contained field. Davids team has spent a lot
of time working on stabilizing the boundary issues, and it is
this prospect which suggests that there has been successful
adventures into the past and future.
As I studied all of this, it became evident to me that when
one is able to accelerate a self-contained field, it will move
into the past. Further, that the greater the acceleration, the
further into the past the object will travel to. When we are
dealing with the aforementioned principles demonstrated in
the illustrations, the proverbial sky is the limit. Conversely,
the greater the deceleration, the further into the future the
object will travel to. David confirmed to me that this is true.
He also told me that the geophysical location of the time
reactor is a very important factor and that there is an area
in Transylvania which has evidence of what amounts to a
huge discharge of space-time motive force (the result of a
tapping of curved space-time). It is the largest evidence of
such a discharge on the planet and is located in Cioclovina
Cave. This, of course, suggests that this area which is
in the vicinity of the Golden Thrones as described in Radu
Cinamars The Secret Parchment is an area that was or
is used for time travel. David and I found it a remarkable
oddity/synchronicity that I was in this very cave last August
14th. Several kilometers long, it is connected to at least seven
other caves and has the highest concentration of bat guano in
the world which has amalgamated with other minerals and
created a high concentration of exotic elements related to
the curving of space-time. All of this gives a much deeper
meaning to the experiences described in my book The White
Bat. I suggest you read it if you have not.
n

that this process of coupling two different areas of twisted

space-time facilitates the creation of dense fields of Closed
Timelike Curves (CTCs). Gravity, as applied in Tiplers
original model, is not necessary. It is the force or space-time
motive force that gets the job done.
All of this gives you a very clear abstract background
theory of how his time reactor works. You can read his
website for a more advanced description, but the purpose
here is to reduce these concepts to the lowest common denominator so that anyone with an understanding of the most
rudimentary knowledge of geometry can understand the
theory. While what he has written should be readily and easily understood by physicists, some of them have had a hostile
or incredulous response, even stating that if this were all
true, they could do it themselves. This is a rather immature
response to say the least. This sort of engineering requires
considerable access to resources most physicists will never
know. David understood this basic abstract over a quarter
of a century ago and has been working on the development
of it ever since in the private sector.
David has reviewed my work herein in preparation for
a podcast he will do with me that will be offered for free
on iTunes and at www.digitalmontauk.com. He was very
pleased and stated that no one has ever before had the patience to explain light cones and closed timelike curves so
simply and that this article should find its way into introductory physics texts in universities. This particular article has
been modified from my subscribers version of the Montauk
Pulse in order to make it more academic-oriented. He also
plans to send me further work along this line.
Recently, I have enjoyed the most lengthy and candid
conversations I have ever had with David. Even so, he has
to hold back as there is a lot he is guarded about talking
about and this includes any adventures into time by himself
or others. He is open to the idea of me visiting one of the
most advanced time control laboratories in the world but
when that might occur is still open to fate and also depends
upon both of our schedules.
I spent a long time studying for and preparing this article,
and I hope that it has broken open as many doors for you
as it has for me. My original understanding of time came
through the tutelage of Preston Nichols. In The Montauk
Project, he stated that the data regarding the electromagnetic bottle effect used in the Philadelphia Experiment was
classified, and he could not talk about it. What he did state
in that book, however, was that time was bent with a very
strong electromagnetic pulse. That is a different approach
but would still fit into the theories mentioned previously. It
is very clear to me that the technology used at Montauk and
during the Philadelphia Experiment was a much cruder and
5

Montauk and Space-Time

What you are reading is a special

edition of a quarterly newsletter that

is based upon an event known as the
Montauk Project which was a series of
experiments that took place at Montauk
Point at a semi-abandoned military
facility known as Camp Hero which
featured a SAGE (Semi-Automatic
Ground Environment) radar installation
once used as the first line of defense
by the U.S. military. While the precise
events of what happened at Camp Hero
during the 1970s and early 1980s is
classified and unknown, several people
came forward with stories of bizarre
experiments that have been described as
the most secretive and amazing research
project in recorded history.
This began with the classified
Philadelphia Experiment of 1943 where
invisibility experiments were conducted
aboard the USS Eldridge that resulted in
full scale teleportation of the ship and
crew but had disastrous effects on the
mental and physical states of the individuals involved. A massive research
project began to study the human psyche
and how it interfaced with distortions in
the space-time continuum. This included computer integration with the human
mind and radio frequency technology as
well as amplifying human emotions and
transmitting the frequencies of such so
as to affect the moods of populations.
Some of the most ambitious aspects
of the Montauk Project sought to tap
the powers of creation itself. The most
colorful of these endeavors included the
manipulation of time.
Most of what we know about the
Montauk Project comes from the experiences and investigations of Preston
Nichols, a scientist who was involved in
the experiments. By the very nature of
what was done and the effort to cover
it up, it has been hard to verify many of
the various claims. There is, however,
enough circumstance and documentation to declare that the Montauk Project

did exist in some for or another. It has

earned the status of an urban legend that
will not go away.
Peter Moon served as the ghost
writer and publisher of these stories in
a book entitled The Montauk Project:
Experiments in Time. His efforts to
verify the Montauk Project has resulted
in a series of many books which he has
published with Sky Books. He has issued a quarterly newsletter since 1993,
The Montauk Pulse, which has continued to investigate this subject and the
many additional threads it has led to.
Dr. David Anderson met Peter in
1999 when he was living on Long Island and was researching time control
under the auspices of The Time Travel
Research Center. The two have been
friends ever since and David arranged
for Peter to visit Romania in 2008 where
Peter has investigated and published
accounts of other space-time projects.
This includes The Transylvania Series
which tell the story of a Romanian
intelligence officers experience with
various projects. Peters most recent
book, The White Bat, is a summary of
these adventures and includes his own
adventures in Transylvania.
Most of Peters adventures center
around his experiences with synchronicity, a phenomena he began to encounter as soon as he investigated various
threads of the Montauk Project.
In recent times, Peter has taken a
particular interest in breaking down the
work of Dr. Anderson in order to put it
into simple times so that humanity can
better understand the benefits and predicaments of time travel technology. If
Mankind is better educated, it can take
full advantage of these circumstances
and also defend itself against the hazards.
If you are interested in subscribing to the Montauk Pulse, see the
information and address to the right.
Also visit www.skybooksusa and www.
digitalmontauk.com
n

From the Editor

The last few months have been

some of the most exciting ever at

Sky Books, and on June 13th, I
conducted an interview with Dr.
David Anderson on the subjects
included in this newsletter. It has
now been released in the form of a
podcast which is available for free
on iTunes and also at www.digitalmontauk.com. It is Peter Moon
Podcast #8, and there are now,
as of this writing, a total of eight
podcasts from Peter Moon which
can be found at the same website.
If you are interested in the
work of Dr. David Anderson, you
are encouraged to visit his website: www.andersoninstitute.com.
We will continue to give updates
on new developments from his
quarter in future editions of the
Montauk Pulse. There is also a
blog at www.digitalmontauk.com
which you are welcome to participate in. If you have questions
or want further info, you can also
write to me at the following email
address: skybooks@yahoo.com.
In the meantime, I am just
putting the finishing touches on a
Spanish version of The Montauk
Project: Experiments in Time.

Peter Moon
The Montauk Pulse
Editor: PETER MOON
Writer: Peter Moon
PUBLISHED BY SKY BOOKS
PO BOX 769, WESTBURY, NY 11590
by Preston Nichols & Peter Moon
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
No part of this publication may be photocopied or used without permission
from the publisher.

THE MONTAUK PULSE

For a subscription to the Pulse

(4 issues annually) send $15.00 plus
$4.00 S/H (outside U.S. add $9.00 S/H).