Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
DOI 10.1007/s11240-014-0587-0
ORIGINAL PAPER
Received: 16 May 2014 / Accepted: 28 July 2014 / Published online: 5 August 2014
Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014
Abbreviations
SH
Schenk and Hildebrandt
MS
Murashige and Skoog
PGR
Plant growth regulator
SE
Somatic embryo
NEC
Non-embryogenic callus
PAL
Phenylalanine ammonia lyase
FRSA Free radical scavenging activity
ESI
Electro spray ionization
PCA
Principal component analysis
H. Ali
Department of Biotechnology, Bacha Khan University Charsada,
Charsada, KP, Pakistan
I. Hussain
Department of Biological Sciences, Karakoram International
University, Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan
123
128
Introduction
Silybum marianum is a medicinally significant herb native
to Mediterranean basin, but is now naturalized throughout
the world. Its bioactive compound is rich in liver protecting
phenylpropanoids, known as silymarin (Abbasi et al.
2010). A very common problem associated with medicinal
plant preparations is the extreme variability in the phytochemical contents (Wu et al. 2009). Similarly, the efficacy
of silymarin from wild grown Silybum plants has been
compromised by geographic variability, lack of uniform
cultivation practices and deterioration of plant material by
biotic and abiotic contamination (Lee and Liu 2003; Haban
et al. 2009). These problems have produced inconsistencies
in the results of various clinical trials in S. marianum
products (Ram et al. 2005). Approaches of in vitro plant
technology like seed germination, micropropagation and
somatic embryogenesis can circumvent these issues of
variability and provide a suitable platform for consistent
production of many medicinally and commercially
important plants (Khan et al. 2014). Moreover, in vitro
cultures and regeneration of plant cells and tissues may
offer a promising source for the production of metabolites
that are difficult to obtain by conventional propagation
methods. The in vitro system for embryogenesis produces
uniform plants rapidly and easily which provides an ideal
experimental mean for investigation of plant differentiation
as well as the large scale production of plants with consistent phytochemical profiles (Moon et al. 2013).
It also gives a clear insight into the factors controlling
somatic embryogenesis, and an understanding towards
morphology of embryogenesis in vitro compared with
zygotic embryo formation. Furthermore, somatic embryos
can be utilized for the preparation of artificial seeds or
synthetic seeds which are analogous to the natural seeds
(Kumar and Thomas 2012). In the literature cited only
one report is available on somatic embryogenesis in cotyledon explants of S. marianum (Radice and Caso 1997).
Metabolite profiling is the analysis to identify and quantify maximum possible metabolites in a biological sample
and its demand is rapidly expanding in different biological fields (Dunn et al. 2005). Furthermore, it can describe
the metabolic events happening at point in specific plant
tissues (Bundy et al. 2009). Since a series of events is
practically executed in vitro during different steps of
somatic embryogenesis (Helmersson et al. 2004). Thus
using metabolite profiling, regulation of developmental
events in different growth phases of embryogenesis can
be further elucidated at the metabolic level (Businge et al.
2012).
The main objectives of present study were to establish a
feasible protocol for somatic embryogenesis and to
123
129
Extraction of metabolites
Extraction of metabolites was carried out according to the
method of Overy et al. (2005). Briefly, 1 ml of solvent
mixture A (methanol:chloroform:water, 2.5:1:1 at -20 C)
was added to the eppendorff tube containing the fine
powder of each sample. Samples were vortexed for 25 s
and kept on ice for 5 min and centrifuged at 14 9 103 rpm
for 5 min at 4 C. The supernatant was collected and
transferred into a pre-chilled storage tube and labeled as
supernatant A. The remaining pellet was re-extracted with
0.5 ml of the pre-chilled solvent B (methanol:chloroform,
1:1 at -20 C) followed by vortexing and centrifugation at
14 9 103 rpm for 5 min at 4 C to obtain the supernatant
B. In the next step, supernatants A and B were combined
and the top aqueous phase (methanol plus water) containing polar metabolites were decanted into a new cooled
1.5 ml eppendorff tube. Then organic layer was separated
from aqueous layer by adding 250 ll chilled distilled water
into the mixture followed by centrifugation for 2 min. Both
aqueous and organic phases were then stored at -80 C
until analysis.
Electrospray ionisation time of flight mass spectrometry
(ESI-TOF MS)
ESI-TOF MS was performed on a LCT spectrometer (API
Q-Star, Waters Corporation, Milford, USA.) based on the
methods described in Davey et al. (2008) and Walker
(2011). The mass spectrometer was operated at a resolution
of 4,000 (FWHM) in positive mode with a capillary voltage
of 4,800 V, extraction cone at 3 V and sample cone at
20 V with a range finder lens voltage of 75 V chosen for
detection of masses from 50 to 800 Da. Source temperature
was 110 C and desolvation temperature was 120 C. Flow
rates were 100 l h-1 for nebulisation and 400 l h-1 for
desolvation. Spectra were collected in centroid mode at a
rate of one spectrum s-1 (0.95 s scan time, 0.05 s interscan
delay) with 180 summed over a 3-min period without
background subtraction or smoothing. Samples were either
loaded using a syringe pump (Razel, Connecticut, USA) at
a flow rate of 20 ll min-1 (aqueous phase) or loaded using
an automated Waters 2,695 Separations Module combining
a HPLC pump and an autosampler (Waters Corporation,
Milford, USA) (organic phase) with an inject volume of
150 ll at a flow rate of 50 ll min-1. The Waters LCT
instrument has the capability to introduce an external
standard (LocksprayTM) and the compound sulphadimethoxine with a neutral exact mass of 310.0736, was used
for this purpose.
123
130
Table 1 Effects of 2,4-D
measured directly against BA or
combination equivalent in SH
media on embryogenic callus
formation (%) and mean
number of somatic embryos per
embryogenic callus from petiole
explants
S#
SH ? PGRS (mg/l)
Callus
induction (%)
0
Embryogenic callus
formation (%)
0
Number of somatic
embryos (mean)
SH (0)
2,4-D (0.5)
69.6 4.6
21.2 1.3
33 2.1
11 1.9
2,4-D (1.5)
73.4 5.4
33.6 2.1
22 1.0
2,4-D (2.5)
86.2 6.5
56 4.8
18 2.3
2,4-D (5.0)
75.1 5.9
43 3.4
13 1.2
10 0.9
2,4-D (8.0)
67.2 4.3
32.2 2.7
BA (0.5)
22.1 1.0
18 2.3
4 0.2
BA (1.5)
39 2.2
26 2.0
9 0.5
BA (2.5)
59.4 5.3
39 2.2
6 0.4
10
BA (5.0)
46 4.0
27 1.4
4 0.2
11
12
BA (8.0)
2,4-D (0.5) ? BAA (1.5)
22.2 1.0
63 4.5
19.3 2.5
53 4.1
2 0.08
29 2.6
13
76.1 5.7
61.4 4.0
46 4.0
14
90 7.6
72 5.6
18 2.3
15
78.4 5.1
64.2 4.4
11 1.9
16
64 4.4
49.4 3.7
6 0.4
Data processing
Statistical analysis
123
131
Fig. 1 Somatic embryogenesis in Silybum marianum a Callus formation at cut ends of petiole explants after 1 week of culture
(bar = 2 mm). b Embryogenic callus with pre-embryoid masses
(PEM) after 2 weeks of culture period (bar = 2 mm). c Embryogenic
callus with somatic emryos (arrows) (bar = 2 mm). d Embryonic
cells showing isodiametric cells (blue star) non-embryonic cells
(black star) with large vacuole, small starch granules and abundant
123
132
80
70
70
60
50
40
30
20
60
50
b
40
30
20
c
10
10
gl
m
2.
0
5
1.
-1
-1
m
gl
-1
1.
0
m
gl
-1
m
gl
5
0.
0
0.
2
S
M
1/
0
SH
EI
M
m
gl
-1
Fig. 2 Effects of various growth media on somatic embryo maturation. Data were collected after 2 weeks of culture. Values are the
mean standard error from three replicates. Column bars sharing the
same letter/s are similar otherwise differ significantly at p \ 0.05
123
133
Table 2 Phenylalanine ammonia lyase activity (Ug-1 FW), antioxidant potential (% FRSA) and silymarin content (mg g-1 DW) in
in vitro-grown plant samples collected from different growth phases
during somatic embryogenesis in Silybum marianum
Sample
FRSA (%)
Silymarin content
mg g-1 DW
NEC
19.9 1.1
21.9 2.1
0.56 0.01
PEM
31.1 3.1
43.8 8.2
0.71 0.02
SE
65.2 4.2
72.2 10.4
4.3 1.0
GSE
44.4 3.1
56.5 6.7
2.4 0.7
PAL
(Ug-1FW)
Silymarin content
(mg g-1DW)
Metabolite profiling
Mass spectra
FRSA (%)
PAL (Ug-1FW)
0.99
Silymarin content
(mg.g-1DW)
0.89
0.83
The spectrum profiles of both aqueous and organic fractions were different although some common peaks can be
seen (Figs. 7 & 8, Supplementary Data). Each spectrum
detected several hundred masses, although the aqueous
fractions of PEM and GSE lines exhibited abundance of
heavier molecules than the NEC and SE lines which
showed several low m/z molecules. Furthermore, the
spectra of aqueous fractions were dominated by common
peaks at m/z 214 and m/z 219, however many uncommon
peaks were also detected with a highest peak at m/z 116 in
GSE. The spectra of organic fractions were dominated by
common peaks at m/z 171, m/z 178 and m/z 183. Within
all organic fractions, SE was dominated by many peaks
which were not common in other samples. As some
compounds are very sensitive to ESIMS, it must be noted
that peak intensity is not necessarily a reflection of the
relative concentrations of these metabolites (Pitt 2009).
Due to the increased number of high mass peaks, the
identification of metabolites using just accurate mass
without any structural identification from a Time of Flight
MS (TOFMS) becomes more difficult due to the
increasing number of isomers which are possible at a
particular mass (Kruve et al. 2013). Several problems can
occur when running samples through ESIMS. Due to the
presence of very high concentration of metabolites in the
sample some of the metabolites may not ionize and so do
not enter the MS, for instance steroids do not ionize well
using ESI because they are relatively non-polar molecules, which lack a functional group capable of carrying a
123
134
123
135
4.0
NEC
PEM
SE
GSE
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
-0.5
80
70
97
144
147
NEC
PEM
SE
GSE
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
172
178
178.2
184
187.2
379.2
Bin masses
Metabolites that influenced the separation pattern among
the biological samples in the score scatter plot were sorted
in the loading scatter plots. As shown in (Fig. 4a; 9A,
Supplementary Data), bin mass 321.2 was found in the
loading scatter plot influencing the separation of the SE
lines and bin mass 137 was found contributing in the
separation of the GSE lines among aqueous fractions.
Similarly, the organic fractions of the biological samples
showed bin mass 178.2 separating the SE lines from the
other plant lines (Fig. 4b; 9B, Supplementary Data). Bin
mass 120 was found contributing in high score scatter
loadings of aqueous fractions but this bin was not identified
by the in-house bin program. So, such bins that were not
identified by the in-house bin program were ignored and
the selected bins identified by the in-house bin program
were compared among the biological samples. Comparison
of the selected bins among the biological samples was
carried out by calculating their percentage of total ion
counts and average intensity counts (Fig. 5a, b; 10A&B,
Supplementary Data). Increased signals of the bin mass
130 was found in SE followed by GSE and PEM while
decreased peak signals detected in NEC. Bin mass 214.2
was also compared among the biological samples with the
increased total ion counts detected in non-embryogenic
callus and decreased signals were detected in somatic
embryo. Average intensities calculated also depicted the
same behavior. Percentage of total ion counts of the bin
mass 379.2 was found to be higher among all the bins
tested in the organic fractions of the NEC and PEM.
Increased response of bin mass 178.2 was found in the SE
and GSE lines in comparison with NEC. Bin mass 172
showed increased peak intensity/average intensity counts
in the SE samples followed by the PEM, GSE and NEC
lines (Fig. 10B, Supplementary Data).
123
136
NEC
PEM
SE
GSE
123
Shikimate-3-P
Myricitin
Linolenic acid
Quercitin
Kaemferol
Cinnamic acid
Sucrose
Fructose-6-P
Fructose
Glucose
Urea
Tryptophan
Proline
Serine
Cystein
Asparagine
Arginine
Isoleucine
Glutamine
Conclusions
This paper reports a feasible protocol for establishment
of somatic embryogenesis in S. marianum and suggests
distinct metabolite profiles during different developmental stages. Future research will refine this technique
for achieving higher frequencies of embryo proliferation and should focus on characterizing the metabolic
137
pathways involved
embryogenesis.
in
the
process
of
somatic
References
Abbasi BH, Khan MA, Mahmood T, Ahmad M, Chaudhary MF,
Khan MA (2010) Shoot regeneration and free-radical scavenging
activity in Silybum marianum L. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult
101:371376
Azzi A, Davies KJA, Kelly F (2004) Free radical biology- terminology and critical thinking. FEBS Lett 558:36
Baskaran P, Staden JV (2012) Somatic embryogenesis of Merwilla
plumbea (Lindl.) Speta. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult
109:517524
Bolwell GP, Bell JN, Cramer CL, Schuch W, Lamb CJ, Dixon RA
(1985) L-Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase from Phaseolus vulgaris: characterization and differential induction of multiple forms
from elicitor-treated cell suspension cultures. Eur J Biochem
149:411419
Bundy JG, Davey MP, Viant MR (2009) Environmental metabolomics:
a critical review and future perspectives. Metabolomics 5:321
Businge E, Brackmann K, Moritz T, Egertsdotter U (2012) Metabolite
profiling reveals clear metabolic changes during somatic embryo
development of Norway spruce (Picea abies). Tree Physiol
32:232244
Cangahuala IGC, Dal VLL, Steinmacher D, Torres AC, Guerra MP
(2007) Improvements in somatic embryogenesis protocol in
Feijoa (Acca sellowiana (Berg) Burret): induction, conversion
and synthetic seeds. Sci Horti 111:228234
Canovas FM, Avila C, Canton FR, Canas RA, Dela TF (2007)
Ammonium assimilation and amino acid metabolism in conifers.
J Exp Bot 58:23072318
Chen JH, Ho CT (1997) Antioxidant activities of caffeic acid and its
related hydroxycinnamic acid compounds. J Agric Food Chem
45:23742378
Correa CM, Oliveira GND, Astarita LV, Santarem ER (2009) Plant
regeneration through somatic embryogenesis of Yacon [Smallanthus sonchifolius (Peopp. And Endl.) H. Robinson]. Braz
Arch Biol Technol 52:549554
Correia S, Cunha AE, Salgueiro L, Canhoto JM (2012) Somatic
embryogenesis in tamarillo (Cyphomandra betacea): approaches
to increase efficiency of embryo formation and plant development. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 109:143152
Dai JL, Tan X, Zhan YG, Zhang YQ, Xiao S, Gao Y, Xu DW, Wang
T, Wang XC, You XL (2011) Rapid and repetitive plant
regeneration of Aralia elata seem via somatic embryogenesis.
Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 104:125130
Davey MP, Burrell MM, Woodward FI (2008) Population specific
metabolic phenotypes of Arabidopsis lyrata ssp. petraea. New
Phytol 177:380388
Dunn WB, Overy S, Quick WP (2005) Evaluation of automated
electrospray-TOF mass spectrometry for metabolic fingerprinting of the plant metabolome. Metabolomics 1(2):137148
Firoozabady E, Moy Y (2004) Regeneration of pineapple via somatic
embryogenesis and organogenesis. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant
42:525533
Gerdakaneh M, Zohori M (2013) The effect of Picloram on somatic
embryogenesis of different explants of strawberry (Fragaria
ananassa Duch.). Brit Biotechnol J 2(2):133142
123
138
Gibson SI (2005) Control of plant development and gene expression
by sugar signaling. Curr Opin Plant Biol 8:93102
Haban M, Otepka P, Kobida L, Habanova M (2009) Production and
quality of milk thistle (Silybum marianum L) cultivated in
cultural conditions of warm agri-climatic macroregion. Hort Sci
36:2530
Helmersson A, Arnold SV, Burg K, Bozhkov P (2004) High stability
of nuclear microsatellite loci during early stages of somatic
embryogenesis in Norway spruce. Tree Physiol 24:11811186
Jeyaseelan M, Rao MV (2005) Biochemical studies of embryogenic
and non-embryogenic callus of Cardiospermum halicacabum L.
Ind J Exp Biol 43:555560
Jones DH (1984) Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase: regulation of its induction, and its role in plant development. Phytochem 23:13491359
Khan MA, Abbasi BH, Ahmed N, Ali H (2013) Effects of light
regimes on in vitro seed germination and silymarin content in
Silybum marianum. Ind Crops Prod 46:105110
Khan MA, Abbasi BH, Shinwari ZK (2014) Thidiazuron enhanced
regeneration and silymarin content in Silybum marianum L. Pak
J Bot 46:185190
Kishor PK (1989) Activities of phenylalanine- and tyrosine- ammonia
lyases in callus cultures of rice. Plant Cell Physiol 30:2529
Koksal E, Gulcin I, Beyza S, Sarikaya O, Bursal E (2009) In vitro
antioxidant activity of silymarin. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem
24:395405
Kong L, Attree SM, Fowke LC (1997) Changes of endogenous
hormone levels in developing seeds, zygotic embryos and
megagametophytes in Picea glauca. Physiol Plant 101:2330
Kruve A, Kaupmees K, Liigand J, Oss M, Leito I (2013) Sodium
adduct formation efficiency in ESI source. J Mass Spectrom
48:695702
Kumar GK, Thomas TD (2012) High frequency somatic embryogenesis and synthetic seed production in Clitoria ternateea Linn.
Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 110:141151
Lee DY, Liu Y (2003) Molecular structure and stereochemistry of
silybin A, silybin B, isosilybin A and isosilybin B, isolated from
Silybum marianum (milk thistle). J Nat Prod 66:11711174
Limem I, Guedon E, Hehn A, Bourgaud F, Ghedira LC, Engasser J-C,
Ghoul M (2008) Production of phenylpropanoid compounds by
recombinant microorganisms expressing plant-specific biosynthesis genes. Process Biochem 43:463479
Lipavska H, Konradova H (2004) Somatic embryogenesis in conifers:
the role of carbohydrate metabolism. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol
Plant 40:2330
Lulsdorf MM, Tautorus TE, Kikcio SI, Dunstan DI (1992) Growth
parameters of embryogenic suspension Culture of interior spruce
(Picea glauca-engelmannii complex) and black spruce (Picea
mariana mill.). Plant Sci 82:227234
Michalczuk L, Cooke TJ, Cohen JD (1992) Auxin levels at different
stages of carrot embryogenesis. Phytochemistry 31:10971103
Minocha R, Minocha SC, Long S (2004) Polyamines and their
biosynthetic enzymes during somatic embryo development in red
spruce (Picea rubens Sarg.). In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant
40:572580
Moon HK, Kim YW, Hong YP, Park SY (2013) Improvement of
somatic embryogenesis and plantlet conversion in Oplopanax
elatus, an endangered medicinal woody plant. Springer Plus
2:421428
Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth
and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant
15:473497
Omar GF, Mohammad FH, Haensch KT, Sarg SH, Morsey MM
(2013) Somatic embryo-like structures of strawberry regenerated
in vitro on media supplemented with 2,4_D and BAP. Ind J Exp
Biol 51:739745
123
139
Zhang N, Fang W, Shi Y, Liu Q, Yang H, Gui R, Lin X (2010)
Somatic embryogenesis and organogenesis in Dendrocalamus
hamiltonii. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 103:325332
Zimmerman JL (1993) Somatic embryogenesis: a model for early
development in higher plants. Plant Cell 5:14111423
123