Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
http://faculty.eas.ualberta.ca/jdwilson/EAS372_13/Vomel_CIRES_satvp...
A large number of saturation vapor pressure equations exists to calculate the pressure of water
vapor over a surface of liquid water or ice. This is a brief overview of the most important equations
used. Several useful reviews of the existing vapor pressure curves are listed in the references.
Please note the discussion of the WMO formulations.
1) Vapor pressure over liquid water below 0C
Goff Gratch equation
(Smithsonian Tables, 1984, after Goff and Gratch, 1946):
[1]
[2]
WMO
(Goff, 1957):
[3]
2 de 8
http://faculty.eas.ualberta.ca/jdwilson/EAS372_13/Vomel_CIRES_satvp...
used. A corrigendum (WMO, 2000) shows the term +0.42873 10-3 (10(-4.76955*(1-273.16/T)) - 1)
in the fourth line compared to the original publication by Goff (1957). Note the different sign of
the exponent. The earlier 1984 edition shows the correct formula.)
Hyland and Wexler
(Hyland and Wexler, 1983):
[4]
+ 0.13914993 101
- 0.48640239 10-1 T
+ 0.41764768 10-4 T2
- 0.14452093 10-7 T3
+ 0.65459673 101 Log(T)
with T in [K] and ew in [Pa]
Buck
(Buck Research Manual (1996); updated equation from Buck, A. L., New equations for computing vapor pressure
and enhancement factor, J. Appl. Meteorol., 20, 1527-1532, 1981)
[1981]
[1996]
[5]
[6]
Sonntag
(Sonntag, 1994)
Log ew = -6096.9385 / T
+ 16.635794
- 2.711193 10-2 * T
+ 1.673952 10-5 * T2
+ 2.433502 * Log(T)
with T in [K] and ew in [hPa]
[7]
Magnus Tetens
(Murray, 1967)
[8]
Bolton
(Bolton, 1980)
[9]
http://faculty.eas.ualberta.ca/jdwilson/EAS372_13/Vomel_CIRES_satvp...
Log ew = 54.842763
- 6763.22 / T
- 4.21 Log(T)
+ 0.000367 T
+ Tanh{0.0415 (T - 218.8)}
(53.878 - 1331.22 / T - 9.44523 Log(T) + 0.014025 T)
[10]
[11]
3 de 8
4 de 8
http://faculty.eas.ualberta.ca/jdwilson/EAS372_13/Vomel_CIRES_satvp...
The review of vapor pressures of ice and supercooled water by Murphy and Kopp (2005) provides
a formulation [10] based on recent data on the molar heat capacity of supercooled water. The
comparison of the the vapor pressure equations with the formulation by Murphy and Koop is shown
in figure 2.
The study by Fukuta and Gramada [2003] shows direct measurements of the vapor pressure over
liquid water down to -38C. Their result indicates tha t at the lowest temperatures the measured
vapor pressure may be as much as 10% lower than the value given by the Smithsonian Tables [1],
and as shown in figure 1 lower as any other vapor pressure formulation. However, these data are in
conflict with measured molar heat capacity data (Muprhy and Koop, 2005), which have been
measured both for bulk as for small water droplets.
Like most other formulations, the IAPWS formulation 1995 (Wagner and Pru, 2002) are valid only
above the triple point. The IAWPS formulation 1995 (Wagner and Pru, 2002) is valid in the
temperature range 273.16 K < T < 647.096 K.
It is important to note that in the upper troposphere, water vapor measurements reported in the
WMO convention as relative humidity with respect to liquid water depend critically on the saturation
vapor pressure equation that was used to calculate the RH value.
Figure 1: Comparison of equations [2]-[11] with the Goff Gratch equation [1] for the saturation
pressure of water vapor over liquid water. The measurements by Fukuta et al. [2003] are shown as
well.
(*)WMO (2000) is also shown. This is based on Goff (1957) with the different sign of one exponent,
5 de 8
http://faculty.eas.ualberta.ca/jdwilson/EAS372_13/Vomel_CIRES_satvp...
Figure 2: Comparison of several equations with the equation by Sonntag [7] for the saturation
pressure of water vapor over liquid water.
The equations by Hyland and Wexler [4], the nearly identical equation by Wexler (1976, see
reference below) and the equation by Sonntag [7] are the most commonly used equations among
radiosonde manufacturers and should be used in upper air applications to avoid inconsistencies.
2) Vapor pressure over ice
Goff Gratch equation
(Smithsonian Tables, 1984):
[12]
6 de 8
http://faculty.eas.ualberta.ca/jdwilson/EAS372_13/Vomel_CIRES_satvp...
[13]
101
+ 0.63925247
- 0.96778430 10-2 T
+ 0.62215701 10-6 T2
+ 0.20747825 10-8 T3
- 0.94840240 10-12 T4
+ 0.41635019 101 Log(T)
with T in [K] and ei in [Pa]
Guide to Meteorological Instruments and Methods of Observation (CIMO Guide)
(WMO, 2008)
[14]
Magnus Teten
(Murray, 1967)
[15]
Buck
(Buck Research Manual, 1996)
ei = 6.1115
with t in [C] and e i in [hPa]
[1981]
[1996]
[16]
[17]
Marti Mauersberger
(Marti and Mauersberger, 1993)
[18]
Log ei = 9.550426
- 5723.265/T
+ 3.53068 Log(T)
- 0.00728332 T
with T in [K] and ei in [Pa]
[19]
The Goff Gratch equation [11] for the vapor pressure over ice covers a region of -100C to 0C. It is
generally considered the reference equation; however, other equations have also been widely
used. The equations discussed here are mostly of interest for frost-point measurements using
chilled mirror hygrometers, since these instruments directly measure the temperature at which a
frost layer and the overlying vapor are in equilibrium. In meteorological practice, relative humidity is
http://faculty.eas.ualberta.ca/jdwilson/EAS372_13/Vomel_CIRES_satvp...
given over liquid water (see section 1) and care needs to be taken to consider this difference.
Buck Research, which manufactures frost-point hygrometers, uses the Buck formulations in their
instruments. These formulations include an enhancement factor, which corrects for the differences
between pure vapor and moist air. This enhancement factor is a weak function of temperature and
pressure and corrects about 0.5% at sea level. For the current discussion it has been omitted.
The Marti Mauersberger equation is the only equation based on direct measurements of the vapor
pressure down to temperatures of 170 K.
The comparison of equations 12-17 with the Goff Gratch equation (figure 3) shows, that with the
exception of the Magnus Teten formula, the deviations in the typical meteorological range of -100C
to 0C are less than 2.5%, and smaller than typical instr umental errors of frost-point hygrometers of
5-10%.
Not shown is the WMO recommended equation for vapor pressure over ice, since it is nearly
identical with the Goff-Gratch equation [12].
Figure 3: Comparison of equations [13]-[18] with the Goff Gratch equation [12] for the saturation
pressure of water vapor over ice.
3) References
Bolton, D., The computation of equivalent potential temperature, Monthly Weather Review, 108, 1046-1053, 1980..
Buck, A. L., New equations for computing vapor pressure and enhancement factor, J. Appl. Meteorol., 20, 1527-1532,
1981.
Buck Research Manuals, 1996
Detwiler, A., Extrapolation of the Goff-Gratch formula for vapor pressure over liquid water at temperatures below 0C, J.
7 de 8
8 de 8
http://faculty.eas.ualberta.ca/jdwilson/EAS372_13/Vomel_CIRES_satvp...
1 December 2011
Holger.Voemel@Colorado.edu