Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
110]
Original Article
ABSTRACT
Objective: To identify the clinical and psychological risk factors associated with dentine hypersensitivity(DH) in order
to provide an early diagnosis and preventive therapy. Materials and Methods: A nested casecontrol study was design
between 2011 and 2012. Atotal of 61 DH cases and 122 controls participated in this investigation. Cases and controls
were matched for sex, group of age and socioeconomic status in a ratio of 1:2. DH to different stimuli such as cold,
heat, acid, and sweet was asked in patient interviews, and dental examinations were used to detect DH. Clinical and
psychological risk factors such as dental hygiene, periodontal disease, acid diet, alcohol consumption, psychological
stress, and psychopathological symptoms were inquired. Psychological stress was measured through the PSS-10 and
psychopathological symptoms were evaluated by SCL-90-R in Spanish. Descriptive and univariate binary logistic regression
analysis were performed to estimate the association between clinical and psychological risk factors and the presence of DH.
Results: Toothpaste abrasivity(odds ratio[OR] 1.881, 95% confidence interval[CI] 1.0103.502, P=0.045), gingival recession
(OR 2.196, 95% CI 1.0204.728, P=0.041), and periodontal therapy(OR 5.357, 95% CI 2.05113.993, P<0.001) were associated
with DH. Subjects with perceived stress(OR 1.211, 95%, CI 0.5182.833, P=0.658), obsessivecompulsive(OR 1.266, 95%,
CI 0.4943.240, P=0.623) and hostility(OR 1.235, 95%, CI 0.5073.007, P=0.642) symptoms had a clinical greater odd of
DH. Conclusion: Oral hygiene products and periodontal conditions are important risk factors for DH. Individuals with perceived
stress, obsessivecompulsive, and hostility symptoms may increase a clinical risk for this entity. Targeting to dental counseling
focused on oral hygiene products, periodontal therapy and a psychological evaluation may be promising in DH prevention.
Key words: Casecontrol studies, dentine sensitivity, oral hygiene, psychology, risk factors
INTRODUCTION
Pain is an unpleasant sensory experience
associated with actual or potential tissue damage
or describe in terms of such damage.[1] Dentine
hypersensitivity(DH) as a state of uneasiness is a
short, sharp pain arising from exposed dentine in
response to stimuli, typically thermal, evaporative,
tactile, osmotic, or chemical and which cannot be
ascribed to any other dental defect or pathology[2] and
affects the quality of life substantially.[3]
The prevalence of DH is quite variable ranging from 1.3
to 68%.[48] The occurrence of DH increases throughout
lifecourse, peaking at 3040years of age. Further,
sex differences have been found, with females more
frequently affected than males,[7,8] although not always
statistically significant.[9] Potential causes include
progressive erosive tooth wear,[10] vigorous tooth
[Downloaded free from http://www.eurjdent.com on Sunday, February 21, 2016, IP: 114.4.82.110]
[Downloaded free from http://www.eurjdent.com on Sunday, February 21, 2016, IP: 114.4.82.110]
RESULTS
Among 61 study cases, 24.5%(n=15) were male
and 75.5%(n=46) were female. Approximately, a
femaletomale ratio was 3:1. Our findings showed
individuals who used a toothpaste with a RDA higher
than 70(OR 1.881, 95%, CI 1.0103.502, P=0.045)
had GR(OR 2.196, 95%, CI 1.0204.728, P=0.041),
and received periodontal therapy in the last month
(OR 5.357, 95%, CI 2.05113.993, P<0.001) increased the
risk for DH. There were some clinical but not statistical
associations between DH and type of toothbrush
bristles(OR 1.622, 95%, CI 0.6823.862, P=0.271), pH
of artificial fruit juices(OR 2.431, 95% CI 0.8177.227,
P =0.105), carbonated drinks p/w(OR 1.697, 95%,
CI 0.9113.162, P=0.094), or pH of alcohol(OR 3.818,
95%, CI 0.32044.479, P=0.254)[Table1].
There were no significant associations between DH
and psychological factors. However, subjects with
higher perceived psychological stress(OR 1.211,
95%, CI 0.5182.833 P=0.658), obsessivecompulsive
(OR 1.266, 95%, CI 0.4943.240 P=0.623) and hostility
(OR 1.235, 95%, CI 0.5073.007 P=0.642) symptoms
had a clinical greater odds of DH[Table2].
DISCUSSION
Biological variations between females and males may
make them differentially vulnerable to different oral
European Journal of Dentistry, Vol 10 / Issue 1 / Jan-Mar 2016
Frequency
OR
CI 95%
P*
15(33.3)
46(33.3)
0.957 0.490-2.042
1.000
26(33.3)
30(33.3)
5(33.3)
1.000 0.541-1.849
1.000 0.540-1.850
1.000 0.326-3.066
1.000
1.000
1.000
26(33.3)
35(33.3)
1.000 0.537-1.862
1.000
57(35.8)
4(21.1)
N/A
2.794 0.910-8.575
0.501 0.159-1.579
N/A
N/A
0.063
0.230
N/A
8(25.0)
53(35.1)
0.616 0.259-1.467
0.271
8(25.0)
53(35.1)
1.622 0.682-3.862
0.271
33(41.3)
28(27.2)
1.881 1.010-3.502
0.045
48(32.9)
13(35.1)
0.904 0.424-1.930
0.795
50(33.3)
11(33.3)
1.000 0.450-2.224
1.000
11(31.4)
50(33.8)
0.898 0.407-1.981
0.790
16(48.5)
45(30.0)
2.196 1.020-4.728
0.041
15(68.2)
46(28.6)
18(35.3)
40(34.2)
1.050 0.527-2.093
0.890
5(16.7)
56(36.6)
0.346 0.126-0.956
0.034
Contd...
[Downloaded free from http://www.eurjdent.com on Sunday, February 21, 2016, IP: 114.4.82.110]
Table1: Contd...
Characteristic
Artificial fruit juices pH
0-3*
>3
Frequency of artificial
fruit juices p/w
0-3
>3*
Carbonated drinks pH
0-3*
>3
Frequency of
carbonated drinks p/w
0-3
>3*
Total of beverages pH
0-3*
>3
Frequency of total
beverages intake p/w
>14*
0-14
Alcohol consumption
Alcohol pH
0-4*
>4
Frequency of alcohol
consumption
>1*
0-1
Frequency
OR
CI 95%
P*
10(35.7)
8(18.6)
2.431 0.817-7.227
9(29.0)
52(34.2)
0.787 0.338-1.831
0.577
18(31.0)
25(42.4)
0.612 0.286-1.307
0.203
0.911-3.162
0.105
36(39.1)
25(27.5)
1.697
22(29.3)
38(38.4)
0.666 0.351-1.265
9(28.1)
52(34.4)
0.745 0.321-1.727
2(66.7)
22(34.4)
2(28.6)
59(33.5)
0.793
0.149-4.211
0.094
0.214
0.491
0.785
Frequency
OR
CI 95%
P*
10(37.0)
51(32.7)
9(31.0)
52(33.8)
8(38.1)
53(32.7)
9(28.1)
52(34.4)
10(29.4)
51(34.2)
6(24.0)
55(34.8)
9(37.5)
52(32.7)
9(28.1)
52(34.4)
7(25.9)
54(34.6)
7(25.0)
54(34.8)
[Downloaded free from http://www.eurjdent.com on Sunday, February 21, 2016, IP: 114.4.82.110]
CONCLUSION
DH is relatively common and significant oral health
problem. Oral hygiene products and periodontal
conditions are important risk factors for DH.
Individuals with perceived psychological stress,
obsessivecompulsive, and hostility symptoms
increase a clinical risk for this entity. Targeting to
dental counseling focused on oral hygiene products,
periodontal therapy and a psychological evaluation
may be promising in DH prevention.
Acknowledgment
We thank the School of Dentistry, Cooperative
University of Colombia, Pasto clinic patients
who accepted to participate in the dentine
hypersensitivity assessment and Dr.Mara Isabel
Portilla Cabrera, clinic coordinator, for upholding
this project.
Financial support and sponsorship
The study was financially supported by the Comit
para el Desarrollo de la Investigacin (CONADI) at
Cooperative University of Colombia.
5
[Downloaded free from http://www.eurjdent.com on Sunday, February 21, 2016, IP: 114.4.82.110]
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
IASP Task Force on Taxonomy. PartIII: Pain terms, a current list with
definitions and notes on usage. In: MerskeyH, BogdukN, editors.
Classification of Chronic Pain. 2nd ed. Seattle: IASP Press; 1994.
p.209214.
DowellP, AddyM. Dentine hypersensitivityA review. Aetiology,
symptoms and theories of pain production. J Clin Periodontol
1983;10:34150.
BekesK, JohnMT, SchallerHG, HirschC. Oral healthrelated quality of
life in patients seeking care for dentin hypersensitivity. JOral Rehabil
2009;36:4551.
BamiseCT, OlusileAO, OginniAO, DosumuOO. The prevalence of
dentine hypersensitivity among adult patients attending a Nigerian
teaching hospital. Oral Health Prev Dent 2007;5:4953.
Que K, Ruan J, Fan X, Liang X, Hu D. A multicentre and
crosssectional study of dentine hypersensitivity in China. J Clin
Periodontol 2010;37:6317.
ReesJS, JinLJ, LamS, KudanowskaI, VowlesR. The prevalence of
dentine hypersensitivity in a hospital clinic population in Hong Kong.
JDent 2003;31:45361.
RahiotisC, PolychronopoulouA, TsiklakisK, KakabouraA. Cervical
dentin hypersensitivity: A crosssectional investigation in Athens,
Greece. JOral Rehabil 2013;40:94857.
Costa RS, Rios FS, Moura MS, Jardim JJ, Maltz M, Haas AN.
Prevalence and risk indicators of dentin hypersensitivity in adult
and elderly populations from Porto Alegre, Brazil. J Periodontol
2014;85:124758.
SpliethCH, TachouA. Epidemiology of dentin hypersensitivity. Clin
Oral Investig 2013;17Suppl1:S38.
West NX, Sanz M, LussiA, Bartlett D, Bouchard P, Bourgeois D.
Prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity and study of associated
factors: A European populationbased crosssectional study. JDent
2013;41:84151.
Addy M, Pearce N. Aetiological, predisposing and environmental
factors in dentine hypersensitivity. Arch Oral Biol 1994;39 Suppl:
33S38S.
Bernhardt O, Gesch D, Schwahn C, Mack F, Meyer G, John U,
etal. Epidemiological evaluation of the multifactorial aetiology of
abfractions. JOral Rehabil 2006;33:1725.
NaiduGM, Ram K C, SirishaNR, Sree Y S, KopuriRK, SattiNR, etal.
Prevalence of dentin hypersensitivity and related factors among adult
patients visiting a dental school in andhrapradesh, southern India.
JClin Diagn Res 2014;8:ZC4851.
Engel GL. The need for a new medical model: A challenge for
biomedicine. Science 1977;196:12936.
KiecoltGlaser JK, McGuire L, Robles TF, Glaser R.
Psychoneuroimmunology: Psychological influences on immune
function and health. JConsult Clin Psychol 2002;70:53747.
Bartley EJ, Fillingim RB. Sex differences in pain: A brief review of
clinical and experimental findings. Br J Anaesth 2013;111:528.
WiesenfeldHallinZ. Sex differences in pain perception. Gend Med
2005;2:13745.
OlleyRC, MoazzezR, BartlettD. The relationship between incisal/
occlusal wear, dentine hypersensitivity and time after the last acid
exposure invivo. JDent 2015;43:24852.
Dorner TE, Muckenhuber J, Stronegger WJ, Rsky E, Gustorff B,
Freidl W. The impact of socioeconomic status on pain and the
perception of disability due to pain. Eur J Pain 2011;15:1039.
Estrela C, Guedes OA, Silva JA, Leles CR, Estrela CR, Pcora JD.
Diagnostic and clinical factors associated with pulpal and periapical
pain. Braz Dent J 2011;22:30611.
Hefferren JJ. A laboratory method for assessment of dentrifrice
abrasivity. JDent Res 1976;55:56373.
RemorE. Psychometric properties of a European Spanish version of
the perceived stress scale(PSS). Span J Psychol 2006;9:8693.
BonicattoS, DewMA, SoriaJJ, SeghezzoME. Validity and reliability
of symptom checklist 90(SCL90) in an Argentine population sample.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1997;32:3328.