Sie sind auf Seite 1von 2

Self-Reflection and Feedback to Peers

Think about your contributions to the group during the entire project process. Review the rubric and
consider how well you meet the criteria. Write a narrative response that justifies includes evidence of your
assessment.
Afterwards, provide an assessment for each of your group members using the same process.
Excellent

Good

Minimally

Not Acceptable

Acceptable
Project

Contributed well to
the development and
the creation of a
visual project that
illustrates the thing,
the science of the
thing, and how the
thing impacts our
community.

Contributed to the
visual project.

Some contribution
to the project

Little contribution
to project,

Project
represents some
science and
some service to
the community.

Project represents
some science and
some service to
the community.

Project
represents the
thing but little
science or
service

Service

Fully participated in
preparing for and
enacting a
meaningful
community service
related to the project.

Participated in
preparing for and
enacting service
to the community.

Did something
related to the
thing that may
have some impact
on the community.

Little
participation,
or
service was not
for the benefit of
others.

Presentation

Contributed well to
the preparation and
the delivery of the
oral presentation
using appropriate
academic and
scientific language.

Contributed to the
preparation and
the delivery of the
oral presentation
using some
scientific
language.

Some
participation in the
oral presentation

Little participation
in preparation or
delivery of the
oral presentation.

Leadership/
Teamwork

Completed
leadership
responsibilities with
respect.
Listened well to
teammates.
Supportive of the
teammates in their
roles.
Contributed to all
aspects of the
project.

Completed
leadership
responsibilities
with respect.
Supportive of the
teammates in
their roles

Made sure my/


their role was
taken care of.

Left
responsibilities to
others.
Did not support
teammates in
their roles.

Did little to assist


in other aspects
of the project.

Example
My Name:
Self-Evaluation:
Overall participation and engagement: Excellent
I believe I was a very strong contributor to my group. I fulfilled my responsibilities as Artistic Director. I
worked to integrate all the ideas of my teammates. I made fair assignments toward the completion of our
project. I established a timeline to schedule the completion of our project. I contributed resources to our
project. One area I could have improved, however, was in communicating with my team. I could have
sent reminders as to expected contributions and helped my teammates better understand what we
needed to complete our project.
Group Member #1: Mickey Mouse
Overall Participation and engagement: Minimally Acceptable
Although I like Mickey Mouse as a classmate, he was not the ideal group member. There were a few
times when Mickey didnt bring the things he said he would bring and thus delayed our work. I didnt feel
that he was supportive of our team when he would criticize our plan or actions. He did the service but
didnt help with the planning. Mickey did do his job as oral presentation director. He did prepare and
contribute to the presentation. Because he was so inconsistent, I can only say that his participation was
minimally acceptable.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen