Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
The Senate held a meeting on April 22, 2009, but the notice and agenda for the meeting stated the
meeting was for April 22, 2008.
The Council said that error created a notice violation because a person seeing the date of the meeting
might reasonably assume the notice was old and thus lose any opportunity to attend the meeting.
The Senate, after voting to fast-track and amend, agreed to a resolution (E.R. 77-1) relative to the death
of Robert Weems, founding dean of the College of Business.
The Senate, after voting to fast-track and amend, agreed to a resolution (I.R. 77-__) (designation
unknown) to amend Senate Rule XXII relating to a senator’s absence during the Senate Transition and
Rules Training.
The Council, ruling on Petitioner’s summary judgment motion, stated that ASUN must comply with the
OML’s clear and complete agenda requirement. Further, since Respondents admitted liability, Council
granted Petitioner’s relief as stated in the complaint.
Actions Voided
Although the effect of the ruling is not clear given the language of the Judicial Council’s order, the
procedural posture indicates that the Council granted Petitioner’s relief in full.
The table below sets out the specific agenda items Petitioner claimed did not satisfy the clear and
complete standard. Since Petitioner’s requested relief was granted in full, any action taken on the items
is void. The source of the action voided is the minutes of the meeting, unless otherwise noted.
2
Statewide Budget Cuts
3
Item 18 S.R. 76-__ Expressing the Resolution agreed to, as
approval of the Senate to fill the amended
space on the third floor of the
Joe Crowley Student Union with
a restaurant concept.
October 15, 2008
Item 18 S.R. 76-__ Establishing a Select Resolution agreed to; no
Committee on University Budget minutes of this meeting
Cuts
October 22, 2008
Item 15 S.B. 76-__ Revisions to the ASUN Fast-track, bill passed, as
Budget amended
4
formation of the Student
Organizations as Academic
Resources initiative
5
S.B. 76-__ To extend the date for Bill passed
the dissolution of Select
Committee on University Budget
Cuts
6
S.R. 76-__ To recognize and Resolution agreed to, as
thank the Student Orientation amended
Staff for dedicating over 25 years
of service to the University of
Nevada
Item 15, Item 16 S.R. 76-__ Recognizing and Resolution believed agreed to
Thanking Dean Gregory Mosier
for His Dedication to the College
of Business
February 11, 2009
Item 18 S.B. 76-__ To Amend Public Law Postponed to next meeting
75-25 Relating to ASUN Elections
February 25, 2009
Item 15, Item 16 S.R. 76-__ Encouraging Deans to Postponed to next meeting
Create Policies That Compel
7
Professors to Turn in Their
Textbook Requests on Time.
8
March 11, 2009
Item 15 S.B. 76-__ Amending Public Law No final action taken
75-38
April 1, 2009
Item 15, Item 16 S.B. 76-_ Amending Public Law Bill fast-tracked, passed, as
75-38 amended
April 8, 2009
No minutes
Item 15, Item 16 S.B. 76-__ Establishing the SOAR Bill passed
Program to provide free and
supplemental tutoring for
Nevada’s students
9
75-7, relating to the duties of the
Vice President
10
April 15, 2009 (77th
Session)
Item 6(b) (Incomplete agenda statement) No relevant effect
11
The Secretary of the Senate enrolled and certified bills predating her appointment. The Council held that
this was a fraudulent act and invalidated the enactments.
The table below sets out the specific laws that were invalidated as a result of this case.
12
Council declined to invalidate actions from April 15, 2009, meeting, which was the only case the
complaint alleged specific violations.
The Judicial Council voided the meetings and all actions took at several meetings if the minutes did not
exist as of the date of the ruling.
The table below sets out the meetings voided and the actions taken, or believed to be taken, at the
meeting.
13
E.R. 76-7 Calling action against Darfur and genocides worldwide; resolution
agreed to
S.B. 76-__ To make revisions to the ASUN Budget, regarding the reallocation of
monies from student fees; bill passed; assigned ASUN Public Law No. 76-26
The Council decided since Defendants in this action did not dispute the complaint, Plaintiff was entitled
to the relief requested in the complaint. All enactments related to the ASUN budget for fiscal year 2009
are void.
As a result of this case, ASUN Public Law Nos. 76-3, 76-9, 76-11, 76-11, 76-18, 76-20, 76-22, 76-25, and
76-26 are void because a proper budget and appropriations bill was never legally enacted.
14