Sie sind auf Seite 1von 6

Case No 09-

09-A827

IN THE

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

______________

RICHARD I. FINE,

Petitioner,

v.

SHERIFF OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY,

Respondent.

______________

On Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus


to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
______________

AMENDED REQUEST FOR LENIENCE BY PRO SE FILER

JOSEPH ZERNIK
In Pro Se
1853 Foothill Blvd
La Verne, CA
Mail:PO Box 526
La Verne, CA 91750
Phone:323.515.4583
Fax: 323.488.9697
Email <jz12345@earthlink.net

Digitally signed by Joseph


H Zernik
DN: cn=Joseph H Zernik, o,
ou,
email=jz12345@earthlink.
net, c=US
Location: La Verne,
California
Date: 2010.04.18 01:24:52
-07'00'
Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 1/6

[PROPOSED] INTERVENOR’S VERIFIED


VERIFIED REQUEST FOR LENIENCE AS PRO

SE FILER

Concomitantly filed under separate covers, with and in support of the Motion to
Intervene:
1. Motion to Intervene;
2. Request for Lenience by Pro Se Filer;
3. Request for Corrections in US Supreme Court Records;
4. Request for Incorporation by Reference.
5. Appendices

TO THE HONORABLE COURT AND TO PARTIES: [Proposed] Intervenor


Joseph Zernik herein requests the Court for Lenience as pro se filer.

1. United States law provides lenience for pro se filers.


[Proposed] Intervenor Zernik requests the Court’s lenience for his "inartful
pleading",1 as accorded by US law to pro se filers. In particular, Pro Se Filer Zernik
is not qualified in assessing the validity of legal theories. He therefore asks the
Court to ignore any irrelevant or erroneous legal theory that he might claim, and to
do take into consideration the facts themselves, as well as the claims, if they can be
supported by some other valid legal theory.2

2. Sections of the code were often left unspecified.


For such reasons routine use was made in the Motion to Intervene and adjoining
records of language implying violations of the law, without spelling out the specific
section of the code.

3. Zernik is effectively denied access to counsel.

1
Ericson v Pardus et al, US Supreme Crt, June 4, 2007 (06–7317); 551 US (2007)
2
Haddock v California Board of Dental Examiners, US Crt App 9th Circ, Nov 26, 1985; 777 F.2d
462
Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 2/6

Once Zernik uncovered the collusion by judges of the LASC and large financial
institutions in the malicious litigation against him in early 2007, Zernik was no
longer able to find honest counsel to represent him. One counsel described Zernik,
already in mid-2007, as “radioactive” – explaining that any counsel who would
honestly represent him would suffer consequences.

4. For all the reasons listed above, [Proposed] Intervenor Zernik respectfully
requests that the court accord him lenience as pro se filer, pursuant to US law.

Therefore, Zernik respectfully requests that the Court accord him lenience as due to
pro se filers in US courts.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: April 18, 2010 Joseph H Zernik

By: ______________
JOSEPH H ZERNIK
In Pro Se
[Proposed] Intervenor]
PO Box 256
La Verne California 91750
Tel: 323.515.4583
Fax: 323.488.9697
E-Mail: jz12345@earthlink.net

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

I certify that the Request for Lenience is proportionately spaced, has a type face of
12
points, and contains 343 words according to the Word 2000, the word processing
system on
which it was prepared. The words counted are those on pages 1-2, excluding this
Certificate of Compliance.
Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 3/6

Executed on this date, April 18, 2010, in La Verne, County of Los Angeles,
California Joseph Zernik

By: ______________
JOSEPH ZERNIK
1853 Foothill Blvd.
Tel: 323.515.4583
Fax: 323.488.9697
E-Mail: jz12345@earthlink.net

STATEMENT OF VERIFICATION
VERIFICATION

[PROPOSED] INTERVENOR’S VERIFIED REQUEST FOR LINIENCE AS PRO

SE FILER

I, the undersigned, Joseph Zernik, wrote and read instant [Proposed] Intervenor’s
Verified Request For Lenience As Pro Se Filer,
Filer and I know the content thereof to be
true and correct, it is true and correct based on my own personal knowledge, except
as to those matters therein stated as based upon information and belief, and as to
those matters, I believe them to be true and correct as well.
I make this declaration that the foregoing is true and correct under penalty of
perjury pursuant
to the laws of the United States.
Executed here in La Verne, County of Los Angeles, on this 18th day in April, 2010.

____________________
Joseph Zernik
Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 4/6

PROOF OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned Joseph Zernik, served the documents described as: Request for
Lenience as Pro Se Filer on Respondents in this action by depositing a true copy
thereof, which was enclosed in a sealed envelope, with postage fully prepaid in the
United States Mail, addressed as follows:

1) Richard I Fine – Petitioner


Inmate RICHARD I. FINE (1824367)
LOS ANGELES COUNTY JAIL
450 Bauchet St.
Los Angeles, CA 90012

2) Sheriff of Los Angeles County - Respondent


Leroy D Baca, Sheriff
Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department
4700 Ramona Blvd.
Monterey Park, CA 91754
Phone: 323 526 5000
Fax: <13232676600@efaxsend.com>
Email: "Baca, Leroy D." <ldbaca@lasd.org>

3) Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles and Judge David Yaffe -
Respondents
John A Clarke, Clerk/Executive Officer
Stanley Mosk Courthouse
111 North Hill Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Phone 213 974 5401
Fax: 213 621 7952
Email: <jclarke@lasuperiorcourt.org>

I certify and declare, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United
States of America and the State of California, that the foregoing is true and
correct.

Executed this date, April 18, 2010, in La Verne, County of Los Angeles, California
Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 5/6

Joseph H Zernik

By: ______________
JOSEPH H ZERNIK
1853 Foothill Blvd
La Verne California 91750
Tel: 323.515.4583
Fax: 323.488.9697
E-Mail: jz12345@earthlink.net

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen