Sie sind auf Seite 1von 9

10/6/2014

CrPC 340-Perjury | Gladiator

Gladiator
Fighting Legal Terrorism
Home
INDIAN PENAL CODE

Helpline
Resources

Strategy
FAQ

Case Cycle

Strategy to Handle Police


CrPC 340-Perjury

Type text to search here...

CrPC 340-Perjury

Follow

Leave a comment Go to comments


http://terminatorak.wordpress.com/crpc-340-perjury/

Follow Gladiator

1/9

10/6/2014

CrPC 340-Perjury | Gladiator

Follow Gladiator
Guys,
As every body here are fighting the Gender Biased laws because our beloved Wives and our In-laws filed False
Get every new post delivered
Cases against us under different sections of IPC u/sto498
etc, DV ACT and CrPC 125. But this acts has to be
your Inbox.
fought back hard, as we need every action towards perfection.
Here is one of the actions where we can CHECK-MATE
Join 1,056
theother
opposition.
followers
If you have prove that the allegation is wrong & your Wife or In-Laws or any Witness has given false evidence
Enter340
your
email address
with intent to procure conviction then you can file CrPC
because
340 Crpc is based on 195 IPC read 195
Ipc
Sign me up

Section 195. Giving or fabricatingPowfalse


evidence with intent to
ered by WordPress.com
procure conviction of offence punishable with imprisonment for
life or imprisonment
Whoever gives or fabricates false evidence intending thereby to cause, or knowing it to be likely that he will
thereby cause, any person to be convicted of an offence which 1[by the law for the time being in force in 2[India]
is not capital, but punishable with 3[imprisonment for life], or imprisonment for a term of seven years or upwards,
shall be punished as a person convicted of that offence would be liable to be punished.
Illustration
A gives false evidence before a Court of Justice intending thereby to cause Z to be convicted of a dacoity. The
punishment of dacoity is 3[imprisonment for life], or rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten
years, with or without fine. A, therefore, is liable to3[imprisonment for life] or imprisonment, with or without fine.
CLASSIFICATION OF OFFENCE
PunishmentThe same as for the offenceNon-cognizableNon-bailableTriable by Court of Session
Non-compoundable.

340. Procedure in cases mentioned in section 195.


(1) When upon an application made to it in this behalf or otherwise any court is of opinion that it is expedient in
the interest of justice that an inquiry should be made into any offence referred to in clause (b) of sub-section (1)
of section 195, which appears to have been committed in or in relation to a proceeding in that court or, as the
case may be, in respect of a document produced or given in evidence in a proceeding in that court, such court
may, after such preliminary inquiry, if any, as it thinks necessary,(a) Record a finding to that effect;
(b) Make a complaint thereof in writing;
(c) Send it to a Magistrate of the first class having jurisdiction;
(d) Take sufficient security for the appearance for the accused before such Magistrate, or if the alleged offence is
non-bailable and the court thinks it necessary so to do send the accused in custody to such Magistrate; and
(e) Bind over any person to appear and give evidence before such Magistrate.
(2) The power conferred on a court by sub-section (1) in respect of an offence may, in any case where that
court has neither made a complaint under sub-section (1) in respect of that offence nor rejected an application
for the making of such complaint, be exercised by the court to which such former court is subordinate within the
meaning of sub-section (4) of section 195.
(3) A complaint made under this section shall be signed, http://terminatorak.wordpress.com/crpc-340-perjury/

2/9

10/6/2014

CrPC 340-Perjury | Gladiator

(a) Where the court making the complaint is a High Court, by such officer of the court as the court may appoint;
(b) In any other case, by the presiding officer of the court.
(4) In this section, court has the same meaning as in section 195.
If she has given two contradictory statementsshe can also be booked for perjury (u/s 340 CrPC)..in
the case of Gangawaa and State of Mysore, in the Crl.R.P No 311of 1966 (1967)1 MLJ (Crl) 421..the
court has stated that
If the prosecution succeeds in proving that the accused in the witness box deliberately made two
statements which are so contradictory and irreconcilable with each other, that both cannot be possibly
true, he can be convicted for perjury
Go ahead and file perjury.
Please find link below to know HOW TO FILE PERJURY IN INDIA?
http://terminatorak.wordpress.com/2012/07/23/how-to-file-perjury-in-india/
S hare this:

Twitter

Facebook

20

Like
Be the first to like this.

Comments (5) Trackbacks (0) Leave a comment Trackback


1.
ABHA MOHANTY
October 12, 2012 at 7:45 pm
Reply
THE HONORABLE COURTS WORK BEREFT OF EMOTION TO SEE UNDERLYING
MALAISE..?
2.
Mrahi
October 12, 2012 at 9:01 pm
Reply
Just to add
Order 6 Rule 15 of the Code of Civil Procedure reads as under:
Rule 15. Verification of pleadings. (1) Save as otherwise provided by any law for the time being in
force, every pleading shall be verified at the foot by the party or by one of the parties pleading or by some
other person proved to the satisfaction of the Court to be acquainted with the facts of the case. (2) The
person verifying shall specify, by reference to the numbered paragraphs of the pleading, what he verifies of
his own knowledge and what he verifies upon information received and believed to be true. (3) The
verification shall be signed by the person making it and shall state the date on which and the place at which
it was signed. (4) The person verifying the pleading shall also furnish an affidavit in support of his
pleadings.. This means there is no need for person to enter the witness box , if he had sign affidavit he shd
http://terminatorak.wordpress.com/crpc-340-perjury/

3/9

10/6/2014

CrPC 340-Perjury | Gladiator

be tried for perjury


3.
Sundar
January 10, 2013 at 10:47 am
Reply
Dear Sir, Many thanks for your guide lines.
in connection with this above article, I could not find the judgment which is referred in your article ..in
the case of Gangawaa and State of Mysore, in the Crl.R.P No 311of 1966 (1967)1 MLJ (Crl) 421..
I searched in Karnataka high court, supreme court. judgment list. but could not find
SO, I request you to pls provide few more info : the court name, Date of Judgment, judge name, petioner,
respondent etc..
So that with this search criteria, we could find..
thanks in advance for ur help .
Regards,
Sundar ( suffering by false 498a, dv, Cr.PC125, interim maintenance, etc.. & firmly fighting against
these false cases)
4.
498agladiator
January 10, 2013 at 11:42 am
Reply
Dear Sunder,
I just missed out the link the Judgment copy, thanks for your intervention.you can find the same here
http://wp.me/p1HnJY-lN.
5.
Sundar
January 12, 2013 at 12:25 am
Reply
My heartfelt thanks boss..
Regards,
Sundar
1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply
http://terminatorak.wordpress.com/crpc-340-perjury/

4/9

10/6/2014

CrPC 340-Perjury | Gladiator

Enter your comment here...

RSS feed

Twitter

Sitemeter

Live Feed

Facebook
http://terminatorak.wordpress.com/crpc-340-perjury/

5/9

10/6/2014

CrPC 340-Perjury | Gladiator

Amol Kurhe

Create Your Badge

World Map

Paper In
Paperli.PaperFrame.Show({id: '87c4a166-e1e5-41a2-9063-ec8e212450e5', width: 390, height: 480,
background: '#ECECEC', borderColor: '#DDDDDD'})
youtube downloader

Do not Copy

Categories
Anti Rape Law
Application Formats
498A discharge under 239 CrPC
Format- Discharge under CrPC 239 in IPC 498a
Argument for Discharge 239
Bail -Format
CAVEAT Petition-Format
Court Techniques
Cross Exam Techniques
Written Argument
http://terminatorak.wordpress.com/crpc-340-perjury/

6/9

10/6/2014

CrPC 340-Perjury | Gladiator

CrPC 91
Divorce Format
EXEMPT FROM PERSONAL APPEARANCE
Perjury CrPC 340
When to File Purjury CrPC 340???
RTI to DGP
RTI To Police on False 498a Arrest
RTI with Wife's Employer
Circulars
Maharashtra
Cracking 498a
Data & Statistics
Domestic Violence Act 2005
Fighting KIT-498a
Gender Neutral Laws
IMD
IPC
IrBM
Judgments
498A
Anticipatory Bail
Alimony
Child Custody
Contempt
CrPC 125
CrPC 407 Transfer
Divorce
False Rape
Guardians & Wards Act (GAWA)
HAMA
Hindu Minority & Guardianship Act (HMGA)
HMA 24
IT/ Hacking
Maintainace in DV Act
Perjury
PWDVA 2005
Quashing 498a
Under Jurisdiction
Under Mutual Agreement
Without Mutual Consent
Justice Shiv Narayan Dhingra
MRA
Multiple maintenance
NCRB
News
http://terminatorak.wordpress.com/crpc-340-perjury/

7/9

10/6/2014

CrPC 340-Perjury | Gladiator

Petition
RTI
CIC Decisions
How to get information of private entity under RTI?
RTI Campaign
RTI Guide
Statistics of RTI Data
SHWB
VAWA
Slogans
Strategy
498A
Child Custody
DV Act 2005
Fighting Maintenance
General Strategy
Restitution Of Conjugal Rights
Strategy -Divorce Cases
Transfer Petition
Videos

Recent Posts
CALCUTTA HC:- Coming with unclean hands disqualifies litigant from obtaining any relief
Movie Review Dawat-e-Ishq
Good Women vs Bad MenAn insight into media gender stereotyping
False Rape StatisticsYoung love often reported as rape in our cruel society The Hindu
CALCUTTA HC- The future salary not being a tangible corporeal property the same cannot be attached
for recovery of the arrear maintenance.
Dowry law misused by disgruntled housewives, stop automatic arrests: SC
SC: SC: dowry law the most misused, abused law in India. Police shld follow 9 point checklist as per
41 crpc
Bombay HC- Possibility of false implication by Wife cannot be ruled out, hence Anticipatory
Bail Granted.
Bombay HC- If there is no Domestic Violence on Woman then the children are not entitle for relief u/s. 20
of PWDVA 2005.
Bombay HC- CrPC 125(3) procedure to be followed for recovery of due amount/ arrears in PWDVA
2005 instead of issuing Non Bailable order Directly.

Gladiator498a
@mymumbra


??? Read: tl.gd/n_1schi5h @ShivSena 3 hours ago


??? Read: tl.gd/n_1schi5h @ShivSena @AUThackeray
@SanjayRautUvach 3 hours ago


??? Read: tl.gd/n_1schi5h 3 hours ago
http://terminatorak.wordpress.com/crpc-340-perjury/

8/9

10/6/2014

CrPC 340-Perjury | Gladiator

Follow @gladiator498a

Disclaimer:
The family of the writer was tortured by the Indian Law which are bias against the Indian Husband. Thousands of
498A, DV Act 2005 & Maintenance cases are filed each year in India by women seeking to wreak vengeance
on their husbands and in-laws. Enormous sums are extorted from intimidated families implicated in these cases by
corrupt Indian police officers and elements of the Indian judiciary. The author and his family haven't bribed any
public official nor have they given in to the extortion. This blog aims to raise awareness of due process in India.
The content of this blog constitutes, opinions, observations, and publicly available documents. The intent is not to
slander or defame anyone or any institution and is the manifestation of the author's right to freedom of expression
with all the protections this right guarantees.

Meta
Register
Log in
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Blogs I Follow
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

Men Against Fanny Queefs MAF~Q (MAAF KYON)


Fight for Justice
Stand up for your rights
MyNation Foundation - News
***Fighting Gender biased laws** **www.family-harmony.org*** *National Family Harmony Society*
498A HelpLine 9880141531
6. 498afighthard's Blog
7. WordPress.com News
Top
Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com. The INove Theme.

http://terminatorak.wordpress.com/crpc-340-perjury/

9/9