Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Statement:
In respect of the banks duty of confidentiality, the exception relating to Public
Interest is the most significant of the 4 exceptions in the 21st century, especially in our
age of global terrorism that threatens human lives. It, therefore, follows that the other
three exceptions are subservient to the exception relating to Public Interest
1. Introduction
The definition of duty of secrecy and four exceptions will firstly be explained.
Then, I will discuss about different points of view, supported by few arguments
and proves, and express my opinion afterwards. The conclusion will be made
1
at last.
a. Definition: duty of secrecy
The duty states that there is no need for a customer to ask the bank to keep
his affairs confidential, while the banks duty extends to all information gained
by virtue of the banking relationship and is not limited to information from or
about the account itself1 which means, all the materials related to
customers2. The duty is not only held when the relationships exist, but also
extended to after the end of relationship, even the customer is dead 3.
However, the duty is not absolute, but qualified, and the justification will be
made in four ways.
b. Four exceptions to the duty of secrecy
By the compulsion of law
It can be broadly divided into 4 types: Prevention of crime; it means the
disclosure required by ordinance will not breach the duty. Regulatory; it
means the disclosure is required by the commission. Evidence in
Proceedings; it means the disclosure is used to be the proof for litigation.
Taxation; it means some kind of authorities can request taxpayers records. 4
By Duty to the public
There is a must to disclose the related materials, as the failure of disclosure
will result on crime, terrorism, which will harm the societys interest.
Consequently, the duty of secrecy can be exempted at that time.
By Banks concern and own interest
The banks legal proceedings mainly aim at recovering the non-payment or
claiming the losses derived from the customers, the bank can disclose the
materials in order to smooth the litigation.5
Information disclosed with customers authority
In expressed form, the bank normally wishes the consent can be obtained by
written form though the oral consent might be acceptable occasionally. An
implied consent is that the customers presumed to notice the bank can
disclose the information under certain circumstances.6
2. Discussion: Is public interest the most significant of the 4 exceptions?
This is an argumentative question. I will illustrate a different point of view in
the following.
1 The judgments of Bankes and Atkin LJJ In Tournier being preferred to that of Scrutton LJ on this point
2 Banking Code, n.18 above, paras 13.1.
3 M. Hapgood, Pagets Law of Banking (11th edn., London, 1996), 121.
4 Ozannes, M. (2009). The duty of confidentiality: The rule and four exceptions.
5 Hsiao, M. Principles of hong kong banking law. (pp. 129-130).
6 Chan, B. S. (2000). Hong kong banking law and practice. (Vol. 1, p. 67). The Hong Kong Institute of Bankers.
I.
II.
3. Opinion:
After illustrating for and against argument, in my opinion, I suggest that the
public interest is the most significant out of the 4 exceptions.
The former part has mentioned some decisions are just motivated by the
private interests, e.g. the banks interests or customers consent. However,
the self-interest can be the reasonable qualification of disclosing materials
only if the disclosure is compatible with the public interests. Indeed, the public
interest is the key decision elements which it gains the first seniority to
determine whether the disclosure is legitimate or not. Also, in certain extent,
the other 3 exceptions are aiming to protect the public interest as well, not
only the private one.
Although the public interest may not have the clear standard, but it cannot be
abolished since it gives the reason to the bank about being permitted to
disclose even absence of compulsion. Moreover, it stands the vital role since
it gives the greatest flexibility of disclosing information in order to deal with the
unpredictable contemporary situation.
Ellinger, E. P., Lomnicka, E., & Hoolet, R. J. A. (2009).Modern banking law. (5th ed., p. 190). Oxford
University Press
4. Conclusion
The exception by duty to public is non-replaceable, and it has the highest
priority within that four exceptions when considering the disclosure, and the
rationale of drawing this conclusion has been established in the paragraphs
above.
5. Reference
Chan, B. S. (2000). Hong kong banking law and practice, The Hong Kong
Institute of Bankers
Ellinger, E. P., Lomnicka, E., & Hoolet, R. J. A. (2009).Modern banking law.
Oxford University Press.
Hsiao, M (2013). Principles of hong kong banking law
M. Hapgood, Pagets Law of Banking (11th edn., London, 1996)
Ozannes, M. (2009). The duty of confidentiality: The rule and four exceptions.
Retrieved from http://www.mourantozannes.com/media/453284/the duty of
confidentiality the rule and four exceptions.pdf
Alan L Tyree (1998), Banking Law in Austrlia 3rd edition
Andrew Laidlaw & Graham Roberts (1989), Law relating to banking services
Hood, P., & Virgo, J. (2012). Principles of lender liability. Oxford University
Press.
Ko, S. (1998). Law and practice of banking services in Hong Kong . City
University of Hong Kong Press.