Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Chapter 10
Flexible Pavement Design Catalog
Flexible asphalt
Flexible asphalt
6
7
SURFACING
BASE COURSE
T1 -T4 use GB1,GB2 or GB3
T5 use GB1 or GB2
T6 must be GB1
T1 -T4 use GB1,GB2 or GB3
T5 use GB1 or GB2
T6 T8 must be GB1
T1 T5 use GB1 or GB2
T6 use GB1
T1 T5 use GB1 or GB2
T6 T8 use GB1
GB1
GB1 or GB2
REFER TO
CHAPTERS
6 and 9
6, 7 and 8
6 and 8
6, 7 and 8
6 and 8
6, 7 and 8
8 and 9
CB1, CB2
7 and 9
All the charts provide alternate pavement structures for all subgrade classes (S1 through
S6). They are not however suitable for all classes of traffic, as some structures would be
neither technically appropriate nor economically justified.
10.2 Use of the Catalog
Although the thicknesses of layers should follow the design charts whenever possible,
some limited substitution of materials between subbase and selected fill is allowable
based on the structural number principles outlined in the AASHTO Guide for Design of
Pavement Structures (Ref. 6). Where substitution is allowed, a note is included with the
design chart.
Ethiopian Roads Authority
Page 10-1
Chapter 10
Flexible Pavement Design Catalog
It is not possible to give detailed guidance on these issues. The charts have been
developed on the basis of reasonable assumptions concerning the first three of these and
therefore the initial choice should be based on the local costs of the feasible options. If
any information is available concerning the likely behavior of the structures under the
local conditions, then a simple risk analysis can also be carried out to select the most
appropriate structure. For many roads, especially those that are more lightly trafficked,
local experience will dictate the most appropriate structures and sophisticated analysis
will not be warranted.
10.3 Design Example
An example of traffic calculations was given in Chapter 2 for a particular section of a
trunk road. In the example, a traffic class T8 has been derived (with a total of ESAs on
the order of 20 millions over the design period).
From Table 10-1 given above, for that class of traffic, it is readily apparent that the use of
the design charts in the catalog of structures is narrowed down to Charts 4 through 7.
From the same table, without further information regarding the subgrade and the
materials, it would also appear that any type of surfacing is possible, as well as several
types of roadbase.
The subgrade strength has reasonably been ascertained (cf. Section 3.2) to be represented
by CBRs in the range of 5 to 7, considering that some portions of the alignment which
might exhibit higher strength are so limited in number and extent that it makes it
impractical to consider several designs. The subgrade strength class to be assigned to this
project is therefore S3 (cf. Table 3-1 and Figure 10-1).
Page 10-2
Chapter 10
Flexible Pavement Design Catalog
The following preliminary information has been derived from the investigations and
simple cost comparison:
Based on the above, and with the T8/S3 combination of traffic and subgrade strength
classes, the design charts 4 through 7 indicate the possible alternate pavement structures
given in Table 10-2.
Table 10-2: Design Example: Possible Pavement Structures
Design Chart No. 4
Pavement
Possible Alternate
Components and Pavement
Selected Fill
Structures
Surfacing (asphalt concrete) (1)
Roadbase:
Crushed Stone
Bituminous stabilized
Granular subbase
Selected fill
Notes:
Alternate
Structure
No. 1
5 cm AC
15 cm
15 cm
12.5 cm
15 cm
Alternate
Structure
No. 2
15cm AC
Alternate
Structure
No. 3
15cm AC
Alternate
Structure
No. 4
5 cm AC
25 cm
27.5 cm
15 cm
22.5 cm
20 cm
27.5 cm (2)
(2)
Further analyses of recent contracts, production costs hauling distances and associated
costs have established relative costs for the various alternate pavement layers (all costs
per m2 and expressed as a ratio to the highest cost element) as shown in Table 10-3.
With these elements, the relative costs of the possible alternate pavement structures are
evaluated as follows in Table 10-4.
Based on the above, the alternate structures including cement stabilized layers (Nos. 1
and 3) appear prohibitive, and the alternate (No. 2) including only crushed stone roadbase
and subbase also appear at a disadvantage. The preferred solutions (Nos. 4a and 4b) are
only marginally different. It may be advisable to present both alternatives for bidding
purposes.
Page 10-3
Chapter 10
Flexible Pavement Design Catalog
5 cm thick
15 cm thick*
20 cm thick
1.00
15 cm thick
25 cm thick
0.56
0.90
15 cm thick
12.5 cm thick
22.5 cm thick
0.81
0.73
0.91
Granular subbase
20 cm thick
15 cm thick
0.29
0.39
Select fill
10 cm thick
15 cm thick
0.13
0.19
MATERIAL
Asphalt Concrete
4a
4b
Page 10-4
Description
Relative
Unit Cost
5 cm AC
+15 cm crushed stone roadbase
+15 cm cement stabilized roadbase (4 MPa)
+12.5 cm cement stabilized roadbase (2.5 MPa)
+15 cm selected fill
15 cm AC
+25 cm crushed stone roadbase
+27.5 cm granular subbase
15 cm AC
+25 cm crushed stone roadbase
+22.5 cm cement stabilized roadbase (2.5 Mpa)
5 cm AC
+20 cm bituminous stabilized roadbase
+27.5 cm granular subbase
5 cm AC
+20 cm bituminous stabilized roadbase
+20 cm granular subbase
+10 cm selected fill
2.62
2.16
2.33
1.73
1.75
Chapter 10
Flexible Pavement Design Catalog
Page 10-5
Chapter 10
Flexible Pavement Design Catalog
Page 10-6
Chapter 10
Flexible Pavement Design Catalog
Page 10-7
Chapter 10
Flexible Pavement Design Catalog
Page 10-8
Chapter 10
Flexible Pavement Design Catalog
Page 10-9
Chapter 10
Flexible Pavement Design Catalog
Page 10-10
Chapter 10
Flexible Pavement Design Catalog
Page 10-11
Chapter 10
Flexible Pavement Design Catalog
Page 10-12
Chapter 10
Flexible Pavement Design Catalog
Page 10-13