0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
42 Ansichten2 Seiten
Worlds of North and South Project Rubric Knowledge of Topics and Understanding of Historical Significance Excellent. Fair o Student(s) provide limited explanations that demonstrate some understanding of the differences between the North and South. Poor o student (s) provide no explanations, or the explanations are weak. Good o information is presented in a logical way and there is excellent evidence of learning, creativity, and innovation reflected in the student's project.
Worlds of North and South Project Rubric Knowledge of Topics and Understanding of Historical Significance Excellent. Fair o Student(s) provide limited explanations that demonstrate some understanding of the differences between the North and South. Poor o student (s) provide no explanations, or the explanations are weak. Good o information is presented in a logical way and there is excellent evidence of learning, creativity, and innovation reflected in the student's project.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Verfügbare Formate
Als PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
Worlds of North and South Project Rubric Knowledge of Topics and Understanding of Historical Significance Excellent. Fair o Student(s) provide limited explanations that demonstrate some understanding of the differences between the North and South. Poor o student (s) provide no explanations, or the explanations are weak. Good o information is presented in a logical way and there is excellent evidence of learning, creativity, and innovation reflected in the student's project.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Verfügbare Formate
Als PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
Knowledge
of
Topics
&
Understanding
of
Historical
Significance
• Excellent
o Student(s)
provide
exceptional
explanations
and
notable
insight
that
demonstrate
in-‐depth
understanding
of
the
differences
between
the
North
and
South
and
how
those
differences
could
negatively/positively
impact
future
relations
between
these
two
sections
of
the
country.
• Good
o Student(s)
provide
satisfactory
explanations
that
demonstrate
the
differences
between
the
North
and
South
and
how
those
differences
could
negatively/positively
impact
future
relations
between
these
two
sections
of
the
country.
• Fair
o Student(s)
provide
limited
explanations
that
demonstrate
some
understanding
of
the
differences
between
the
North
and
South
and
how
those
differences
could
negatively/positively
impact
future
relations
between
these
two
sections
of
the
country.
• Poor
o Student(s)
provide
no
explanations,
or
the
explanations
are
weak
and
demonstrate
a
very
limited
understanding
of
the
differences
between
the
North
and
South
and
how
those
differences
could
negatively/positively
impact
future
relations
between
these
two
sections
of
the
country.
Organization
&
Communication
of
Ideas
• Excellent
o Information
is
presented
in
a
logical
way
and
there
is
excellent
evidence
of
learning,
creativity,
and
innovation
reflected
in
the
student’s
project.
• Good
o Information
is
mostly
presented
in
a
logical
way,
and
ideas
are
understandable
if
not
fully
developed.
• Fair
o Student(s)
miss
some
of
the
information
requirements.
The
organization
and
the
development
of
ideas
are
not
strong.
• Poor
o Student(s)
miss
most
or
all
of
the
information
requirements.
The
presentation
is
disorganized
and
ideas
are
underdeveloped.
(SEE
REVERSE
SIDE
FOR
MORE
DETAILS)
Project
Rubric
adopted
from
ABC-‐CLIO
Middle
Grades
Evaluation
Criteria
Worlds
of
North
and
South
Project
Rubric
Technical
Elements
• Excellent
o The
video
and
any
included
media
(graphics,
sound,
video,
etc.)
or
student
acting
enhance
the
communication
of
the
content
and
meet
the
project
requirements.
• Good
o The
video
and
any
included
media
(graphics,
sound,
video,
etc.)
or
student
acting
mostly
reinforce
the
communication
of
the
content.
Minor
inconsistencies
in
format
do
not
have
a
significant
impact
on
the
presentation.
• Fair
o The
video
and
any
included
media
(graphics,
sound,
video,
etc.)
have
some
technical
problems.
Student
acting
within
the
movie
is
distractive,
silly,
or
unnecessary.
• Poor
o The
video
and
any
included
media
(graphics,
sound,
video,
etc.)
or
student
acting
has
several
flaws
and
is
not
meaningful
or
not
appropriate.
Synthesis
of
Presentation
• Excellent
o Final
video
is
unique
and
well
designed
(very
informative
as
well
as
engaging)
and
its
content
flows
smoothly
from
beginning
to
end.
• Good
o Final
video
is
well
designed
(informative
and
engaging)
and
its
content
is
mostly
easy
to
follow.
• Fair
o Final
video
is
adequate.
Its
content
delivery
has
some
lapses
in
consistency
and
may
be
confusing.
• Poor
o Final
video
does
not
convey
content.
Content
delivery
is
disorganized
and
difficult
to
comprehend
and/or
understand.
Project
Rubric
adopted
from
ABC-‐CLIO
Middle
Grades
Evaluation
Criteria