Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
State of Illinois
Judicial Inquiry Board
100 West Randolph Street
Suite 14-500
Chicago, Il 60601
Subject: Judicial Misconduct by Judges Tom Lytton, Mary McDade and
Daniel Schmidt , in the Appellate Court of Illinois, Third Judicial District
RE:
Based their decision and even copied extensive content from the
stricken Appellee Brief.
Intentionally denied my right to address the multiple lies
contained in the Appellee Brief.
Failed to address the two primary issues and basis of the appeal:
o The attorneys on both sides committed fraud.
o The financial position I was put in with a negative cash
flow of $1000/month as a result of fraud, coercion and an
unconscionable judgment from the Circuit Court of Peoria
County IL
Intentionally failed to list that I am responsible for the financial
needs of the children born into the marriage. Specifically that I
was responsible for supporting my minor son and pay their
education expenses
The Appellee Brief was struck yet Judges Lytton, McDade and Schmidt
used the stricken brief as the basis of their decision. Their decision
contains text copied directly from the stricken brief. The Appellate
Court recommended waiving oral arguments.
Had I known the Appellate Court Judges were going to use the
stricken brief I would have responded to the lies contained in
the Appellee Brief and I never would have agreed to waive oral
arguments. I am citizen of Illinois and the United States. I
have the Constitutional Right to due process. That right was
taken away from me. My civil rights have been violated.
Specifically I was denied the right to clarify the following:
The above facts are quite relevant to my appeal. Why did Judges
Lytton, McDade and Schmidt fail to mention Judge Risingers February
22, 2012 order stating he never said he would award 50-60% of my
gross pay in their decision? Were they protecting the attorneys that
clearly committed fraud? Were they protecting Judge Risinger who did
nothing knowing for a fact that I was told he would award 50-60% of
my gross pay? Why did the Appellate Court Judges intentionally leave
out of their decision that I was responsible for supporting my youngest
son? Why did they leave out that I am responsible for my sons
education expenses? Because it shows the attorneys committed fraud,
the settlement was coerced, and the judgment is unconscionable. It
sickens me that both the Circuit Court and the Appellate Court have
ignored the needs of my sons.
It appears from the actions of Judges Lytton, McDade and Schmidt that
the decision on my appeal was decided before the appeal process even
started.
A few additional facts:
Rob and Drew Parker
4
Ed Murphy
Ed Murphy is a liar and very effective at manipulating the court.
His strategy the morning of September 27, 2011 was an
assassination of my character to set the stage for the
prearranged meeting with the Judge. In March 2012, I filed a
complaint against Murphy for his lying and illegal actions with
the ARDC (Attachment F). That effort, like this appeal, proved to
be a waste of time.
Judge Michael Risinger
One would question where was Judge Risinger in all of this? He
has consistently done what ever Murphy told him to do and
worked to protect the attorneys involved on September 27, 2011.
He has consistently decided against me and made it very clear
that I must bury myself in debt or he would send me to jail. He
threatened me with jail in June and July 2012 simply because I
could not afford the maintenance, the mortgages and supporting
my son and myself. I navely relied on the Appellate Court to
right this wrong and continued go further in debt everyday
waiting for their decision.
As Judges Lytton, McDade and Schmidt reviewed transcripts they
must have ignored the following comments and actions from
Judge Risinger:
The Damage:
I have taken out a $25K personal loan, put my car up as
collateral for a $34K loan, taken out a $16K personal loan,
borrowed $50K against my stock and borrowed $50K from my
brother to purchase a home. I had to borrow from my brother
since Murphy retaliated against me and locked up my stock in
January 2013. That was because I obtained a restraining order
against my ex-wife in January for threatening to slit my oldest
sons throat, threatening to slit the throat of the woman I am
I will fix the injustice I have endured, not only for me but to protect
others from those involved in this debacle of justice described above.
For example I have asked the NAACP to review the sentences Judge
Risinger issued to blacks that had the misfortune to be in his court. I
do this because many of those sentenced may not have had a Polo
brand shirt in their closet.
As this case progresses, if I can, I will file criminal fraud charges
against Rob Parker, Drew Parker, Ed Murphy and Sherri Hexum. I will
pursue the mal-practice suit already filed against the law firm Parker &
Halliday. I am requesting the FBI to investigate the corruption in the
Illinois Courts. I am meeting with a reporter to follow the future events
in this case. I am copying the Illinois and United States Attorney
Generals on this complaint. I will hang on to the hope that the judicial
board will take the appropriate steps with Judges Lytton, McDade and
Schmidt.
All this, just so I get a fair divorce. Unconscionable.
Sincerely,
Mark G. Hexum
11123 N. Rhonda Way
Dunlap, IL 61525
(309) 253-9289
Enclosures:
Attachment
Attachment
Attachment
Attachment
Attachment
Attachment
A:
B:
C:
D:
E:
F:
Appellant Brief
Appellee Brief
Appellate Court Order dated August 16, 2012
Appellate Court Order dated December 18, 2012
Appellate Court Decision dated July 15, 2013
ARDC Complaint
cc:
FBI Springfield Corruption Investigation
Lisa Madigan - Illinois Attorney General
Eric Holder US Attorney General