Query No.

Subject:

Capitalisation of expenditures in respect of projects under construction.1

A.

Facts of the Case

1.

A company (hereinafter referred to as the company) has been created as an

undertaking of a State Government for implementing the Metro Rail Project (hereinafter
referred to as the project). The company has entered into an agreement with A Ltd. for
construction of phase IA of the project.

2.

The querist has stated that for the construction of phase IA, A Ltd. has agreed to

charge 6% on the total estimated value (as per Detailed Project Report (DPR)) of the
works carried out by A Ltd. as overhead charges/fees to cover their establishment and
administrative overheads. It is worth to note here that rate of fees normally charged on
the deposit works is 12.5%. The company, during the preparation of books of account for
the year ended on 31/03/2012, has charged the fees paid to A Ltd. to revenue instead of
capitalising the same on the premise that A Ltd. is providing administrative/management
support to the company by undertaking on behalf of the company, the appointment of
contractors and consultants and management thereof and procurement of equipments and
installation thereof; virtually this is as an extension of the administrative wing of the
company. If A Ltd. would not have agreed to do it, the company would have directly
incurred the establishment cost. According to the querist, as per Accounting Standard
(AS) 10, Accounting for Fixed Assets also, the cost which is not specifically
attributable to a specific asset is not to be capitalised. The expression "may be included as
part of the cost of the construction" has been used in paragraph 9.2 of AS 10, which
indicates that those expenses which are not specifically attributable to specific fixed
asset, may not be capitalised (emphasis supplied by the querist).
1

Opinion finalised by the Committee on 5.4.2013 and 6.4.2013

Page 1 of 6

3.

The querist has also stated that the administrative charges payable to A Ltd. are

on the total cost even if the actual expenditure is lower. Further, it is not attributable to a
specific asset group whereas the assets proposed to be created may fall under the
following asset groups:

(i)

Civil works (All building, depot, station etc.)

(ii)

Plant & Machinery

(iii)

Rolling stock

(iv)

Power sub-station

(v)

Other fixed assets

In view of this also, the capitalisation is not covered under the spirit of AS 10.

4.

During the supplementary audit under section 619(3)(b) of the Companies Act,

1956, of the company's accounts for the year ending on 31/03/2012, the Principal
Accountant General of the State, has stated this treatment to be in contravention to AS
10.

5.

However, the company differs on this interpretation of AS 10 due to the fact that

the spirit of AS 10 is not to ensure that all expenditure that may be classified as capital
expenditure must be so classified. Instead, it is to ensure that no expenditure that may not
be classified as capital expenditure is not so classified. This spirit of AS 10 has been
followed by the company only to avoid unnecessary capitalisation of the expenses in
question.

The querist has further mentioned that the establishment expenses incurred by the
company on its employees including Chairman-cum-Managing Director (CMD), finance
department, technical department and the administrative expenses incurred by the
Page 2 of 6

company have been accounted for as revenue expenses, the accounting of which has been
duly accepted by the Comptroller and Accountant General (C&AG).

B.

Query

6.

The querist has sought the opinion of the Expert Advisory Committee of the

Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) on the application of AS 10

particularly paragraph 9, components of costs, of which sub-paragraph 9.2 clearly states
that administrative and general overhead expenses are usually excluded from the cost of
fixed assets because they do not relate to a specific fixed asset. Accordingly, whether the
establishment and administrative overheads etc. paid by the company to A Ltd. is capital
or revenue expenditure (allowable under the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961) and
therefore, whether the treatment given in the accounts by the company is the violation of
AS 10.

C.

Points considered by the Committee

7.

The Committee notes that the basic issue raised in the query relates to accounting

treatment of fees paid to A Ltd. which is providing administrative and management

support to the company relating to the appointment of contractors and consultants,
procurement and installation of equipments for the construction of the project. The
Committee has, therefore, considered only this issue and has not touched upon any other
issue arising from the Facts of the Case, such as, correctness in the treatment of
establishment expenses incurred by the company and other administrative expenses,
which are accounted as revenue expenses and also accepted by the C&AG, etc. Further,
the Committee has presumed that various assets under the project or the project itself are
controlled by the company and have been appropriately capitalised in the books of the
company. The Committee also wishes to point out that its opinion is expressed purely
from accounting point of view and not from the angle of legal interpretation of any legal
Page 3 of 6

enactment, such as, Income-tax Act, 1961, i.e., whether any expense is allowable or
disallowable under the Income-tax Act as the Committee is prohibited from answering
such issues as per its Advisory Service Rules.

8.

The Committee notes paragraphs 9.1, 9.2, 20 and 21 of AS 10 reproduced below:

9.1 The cost of an item of fixed asset comprises its purchase price, including
import duties and other non-refundable taxes or levies and any directly
attributable cost of bringing the asset to its working condition for its intended use;
any trade discounts and rebates are deducted in arriving at the purchase price.
Examples of directly attributable costs are:
(i) site preparation;
(ii) initial delivery and handling costs;
(iii) installation cost, such as special foundations for plant; and
(iv) professional fees, for example fees of architects and engineers.

9.2 Administration and other general overhead expenses are usually excluded
from the cost of fixed assets because they do not relate to a specific fixed asset.
However, in some circumstances, such expenses as are specifically attributable to
construction of a project or to the acquisition of a fixed asset or bringing it to its
working condition, may be included as part of the cost of the construction project
or as a part of the cost of the fixed asset.

20. The cost of a fixed asset should comprise its purchase price and any
attributable cost of bringing the asset to its working condition for its intended
use.

21. The cost of a self-constructed fixed asset should comprise those costs that
Page 4 of 6

relate directly to the specific asset and those that are attributable to the
construction activity in general and can be allocated to the specific asset.

From the above paragraphs of AS 10, the Committee is of the view that the basic
principle to be applied while capitalising an item of cost (including administration and
other general overhead expenditure) to a fixed asset under construction is that it should be
directly attributable to the construction of the fixed asset for bringing it to its working
condition for its intended use. These are the expenditures without the incurrence of
which, the construction of fixed asset could not have taken place and the asset could not
be brought to its working condition, such as, site preparation costs, installation costs,
professional fees, etc. The Committee is further of the view that the above principles of
capitalisation relating to a fixed asset are equally applicable to a group of assets including
a project.

9.

The Committee notes that in the extant case the company has entered into the

agreement with A Ltd. for the appointment of contractors and consultants and
management thereof and for procurement and installation of equipments for the purpose
of the construction of the project which the company has argued to be administrative
overheads by nature. The Committee further notes from AS 10 that if expenses are
directly attributable to the construction of a project or to the acquisition of any fixed asset
or bringing it to its working condition, these may be included as part of the cost of the
project or as a part of the cost of the fixed asset. The Committee is of the view that the
fees paid to A Ltd. is being specifically incurred for the project and therefore, should be
regarded as directly attributable to the project or fixed asset(s) constructed or acquired for
the project and therefore should be capitalised in the cost of the project or fixed asset.

10.

As regards the querist's argument in the context of phrase, may be included as

part of the cost of the construction, used in paragraph 9.2 of AS 10, the Committee is of
the view that paragraph 9.2 explains only the application of the Main Principles as
Page 5 of 6

given in paragraph 20 of AS 10 (reproduced in paragraph 8 above), which states that the

cost of fixed asset should comprise any attributable cost of bringing the asset to its
working condition for its intended use. Accordingly, since the expenses incurred in the
extant case are specifically incurred for the project and are directly attributable to it, these
should be capitalised as discussed in paragraph 9 above.

11.

As regards the querist's argument that the principles of AS 10 is to avoid

unnecessary capitalisation of the expenses, the Committee does not agree with the querist
as there are specific principles for capitalising an expenditure as an asset or for expensing
it as the decision to capitalise/expense can have a material effect on the companys
reported results.
D.

Opinion

12.

On the basis of the above, the Committee is of the opinion that the treatment made

by the company on the expenses incurred as establishment and administrative expenses in

the form of fees to A Ltd. as revenue expenditure is not in accordance with AS 10 and
these should be capitalised to the project/asset(s) concerned as discussed in paragraphs 8
and 9 above.

Page 6 of 6