Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Lana O’Neill
Jan Rieman
English 1101X
February 10, 2010
Jean Anyon is a professor at the City University of New York who has written
several books, and is the author of “Social Class and the Hidden Curriculum of Work.”
This article is a result of an observation of five elementary schools in New Jersey. After
observing the interaction of teachers with students and their teaching practices in varying
reading Anyon’s essay, I believe that the middle class schools are the best choice because
toward students, how they teach the information, and the use of resources based on the
social class of the area that the school is located. Anyon reveals that the teachers change
to prepare the students for the jobs that they think, based on their social class and the
social class of their parents, that they will have in the future. The first two schools were
“working class schools” in which the majority of the parents had blue collar jobs, 15%
were unemployed, less than 30% of the mothers worked, and 15% of the families were
considered to be at or below the federal poverty line (Anyon 230). The third school was
considered a “middle class school” where most of the parents had blue collar jobs but the
jobs were mostly middle management (230). The fourth school was an “upper class
school” and the fifth school is called an “Executive Elite school” (231), where the parents
had higher paying jobs and the area in which they were located was of a higher social
O’Neill 2
class. The similarities between the schools were that the teachers asked questions, they
had rules, homework, textbooks, and tests (231). Despite the similarities, Anyon found
that each school was teaching its children differently. The working class schools students
had little decision making or choice, the textbooks weren’t used, the teacher referred to
classroom objects as hers, learning wasn’t interactive with the majority of the class being
spent copying notes, and following the right steps to find the answer was the main
concern (234-235). The middle class school focused on getting the right answer, some
choice and decision making was involved, textbooks were used, and the teacher asked
more questions to involve the students (236). The upper class school used a lot of
ideas, more activities instead of just copying notes, and the children’s opinion was very
valued (240-241). In the Executive Elite School, children were required to use reasoning
to figure out the problems, correct answers were not important, bells are not used to
announce the end of class, and the children’s movement was rarely monitored (242-245).
Anyon implies that she believes that the different methods of teaching are determined by
the area in which the school is located and that as the social class improves, so does the
teaching.
me that the teaching does differ depending on the location of the school,however I don’t
think that it is intentional. I think that if the school is located in a less fortunate
neighborhood then it probably doesn’t have as much money, therefore it can’t afford the
best teachers. Anyon mentions that the children in the working class schools are
“developing abilities and skills of resistance” which I think can pose a problem for the
O’Neill 3
teacher if students are resisting the work assigned (247). According to this article, the
teachers in the working class schools rarely involved the students and their opinions,
which makes me wonder if this is because the students have behavioral problems, or if
the students have behavioral problems because they are not being given a change to get
involved. In my opinion, the students have behavioral problems because they think that
If the school has the materials needed, such as textbooks, it makes sense to give
them to the students, but the lower class schools didn’t. I think that the teachers are
afraid to use the books because they think that the students won’t respect the books,
which is probably true, however I think that they wouldn’t respect them because they feel
the teacher doesn’t trust them. This is the same situation as the movie Freedom Writers.
In this movie, a teacher starts working at a very poor school and is told she is not allowed
to let the kids use the textbooks because they won’t respect them and the school can’t
afford to buy new ones. The school feels this way because the books they have are
already torn and the students have a history of being disrespectful towards the school’s
property. When the teacher raises the money herself and buys brand new books for the
students, they take care of them because they feel trusted and they appreciate the effort
that their teacher has made. I believe that if the teacher shows the students respect, then
The best school, in my opinion is the middle class school because it taught the
students how to get the right answer but also allowed for some creativity. The teacher
explained her decision making process and involved the students when teaching. The
teacher and students still relied on bells to change classes, which means that some rules
O’Neill 4
and structure were still visible. Also, the students respected the teacher and the
classroom materials because they were given a chance to use them and the teacher
offered them respect in return, unlike the working class schools. The middle class school
sounds most like the schools that I have always gone to and it seems to have been an
textbooks which, although sometimes shared, were distributed to every student. The
teachers, also, explained why answers were reached and why decisions in the classrooms
were made. Through explaining these things to the students, the students gained an
understanding for the decision making process and were able to fully understand
concepts. These skills helped to prepare me for my later school years. The middle class
schools are a good mixture of rules and freedom; it allows the students to be creative, yet
I think that the Executive Elite School is too high quality thinking for fifth
“reasoning through a problem, to produce intellectual products that are both logically
sound and of top academic quality” (242). I don’t think that this is an effective way to
teach such young children because they aren’t ready for this type of deep thinking. At
such a young age, I think in order for them to learn, children must stay both entertained
and interested. Also this article mentions that the correct answers are not given by the
book or the teacher (243), which I think could pose a problem in later school years
because correct answers are going to become important at some point in one’s
educational career. At a college level, I think that this teaching method would be
appropriate, but until then I think that the middle class school is the best choice.
O’Neill 5
Students are taught with a hidden curriculum that can be explain in Anyon’s
essay. It explains that depending on the working class of the student’s parents, different
material is taught to them. The different material and different methods of teaching are to
prepare the students for the jobs that the teachers think that they will have when they
graduate. This is wrong because I don’t think that the working class of their parents
should give other kids a better change at schooling and ultimately life. Everyone should
have a fair chance to make something of themselves and I think that the middle class
Work Cited
Anyon, Jean. "Social Class and the Hidden Curriculum of Work." Writing Conventions.