Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Research
PROJECT REPORT
ON
COMPARITIVE ANALYSIS OF MUTUAL FUNDS
SUBMITTED TO
SASMIRAS INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES &
RESEARCH,
SASMIRA MARG,WORLI, MUMBAI
BY
S. JAIDHEER REDDY
Roll No. 102
MMS 2015-16 Semester III
IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF
MASTER OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES (MMS),
UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI
June, 2015
A
Summer Internship Project Report
On
Specialization: FINANCE
Batch: 2014-16
Under the Guidance of
Dr Amit Oak
Director,
Sasmira`s Institute of Management Sudies & Research
June, 2015
DECLARATION
I, Mr. S. Jaidheer Reddy hereby declare that this project report is the
record of authentic work carried out by me during the period from 22nd
May 2015 to 21st July 2015 and has not been submitted to any other
University or Institute for the award of any degree / diploma etc.
Signature :
Date :
This project report is the record of authentic work carried out by him /
her during the period from 22nd of May 2015 to 21st of July 2015.
He / She has worked under my guidance.
Signature :
Name : Dr. Amit Oak
Project Guide (Internal):
Date :
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I would like to thank our Director Dr. Amit Oak for his
encouragement, cordial support, valuable information and guidance,
which helped me in completing this task through various stages
report.
Table of C O N T E N T S
Chapter No.
Title
Page No.
iii
iv
Acknowledgement
vi
Table of Contents
vii-viii
Chapter Scheme
ix-x
List of Tables
List of Graphs
x-xi
xiii
List of Charts
xiv
Executive Summary
xv
Introduction
1.1
1.2
3-4
1.3
Company profile
29
1.4
38
1.5
39
1.6
39
II
Research Methodology
2.1
Research design
41-42
2.2
Primary data
42-43
2.2
Secondary data
43
2.3
Sample design
43
2.3.1
Population
43
2.3.2
Sample size
44
2.3.3
Sampling method
44
2.4
44
2.4.2
44
2.4.3
Drafting of a questionnaire
44-45
2.4.4
2.5
45
46
2.6
Limitations
46
III
47-78
IV
Findings
79-80
Conclusions
81-83
VI
Recommendations
84-89
Bibliography
90
Appendices /Annexure
91-97
CHAPTER SCHEME
Chapter No.
Title
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Inception
1.2
3-4
1.3
1.4
Distribution Channels
6-9
1.5
9-10
1.6
Categories
11-14
1.7
Current scenario
15
1.8
Growth Drivers
16
1.9
Investment Strategies
16
1.10
17
1.11
Risk Involved
17-19
1.12
19-22
1.13
Financial Aspects
22-28
1.14
Company Profile
29
1.15
Products
30-36
Page No.
1.16
Competitors
37
1.17
Need of Study
38
1.18
39
10
LIST OF CHARTS
Chart No.
Title
Page No.
1.1
1.2
10
1.3
11
1.4
15
2.1
53
2.2
53
2.3
54
2.4
54
2.5
55
2.6
56
2.7
57
2.8
58
11
2.9
59
2.10
60
2.11
61
2.12
62
12
LIST OF GRAPHS
Graph No.
Title
Page No.
1.1
1.2
19
3.1
75
3.2
76
13
LIST OF TABLES
14
Table No.
Title
Page
No.
1.1
49
1.2
50
3.1
67
3.2
68
3.3
69
3.4
70
3.5
71
3.6
72
3.7
73
3.8
74
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
15
Mutual funds pool money from different investors and invest in different investment sources
like stocks, shares, bonds etc. A professional fund manager manages these and returns are
paid in according to what option the investor has opted (Regular or Growth). Mutual funds
have to be subscribed in units and the purchase or sale is dependent on NAV (Net Asset
Value), taking into consideration the exit load factor into account (before August, 2009 there
used to be entry load also, which SEBI has now discarded)
This project undertaken deals with customer perception with regard to mutual funds that is
the schemes they prefer, the plans they are opting, the reasons behind such selections and also
this project dealt with different investment options, which people prefer along with and apart
from mutual funds. Like postal saving schemes, recurring deposits, bonds, and shares. The
project also focuses on comparing the SBIs Focus products with that of competitors in the
business in respect of the key financial parameters.
The findings from this project is that most of the people are hesitant in going for new age
investments like mutual funds and prefer to avert risks by investing in less riskier investment
options like recurring deposits and so. Also people going for investment in mutual funds are
not going for high-risk portfolios and schemes but want to go for medium risk elements. And
another finding is that most of the workingwomen does not prefer this type of investments.
16