Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA, Allmandring 37, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
Stuttgart Media University, Nobelstr. 10, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 15 April 2013
Received in revised form 2 December 2013
Accepted 5 December 2013
Available online 25 December 2013
Keywords:
Barrier coatings
Filled polymer coatings
Inks
Platelet llers
Permeability
Flexographic printing
a b s t r a c t
Barrier properties of packaging materials against moisture and oxygen penetration are of high relevance.
Enhanced protection of existing materials against weather conditions can be achieved by application of
printed coatings. To improve barrier performance of packaging materials, new inks for obtaining printed
coatings with a layered structure were developed and investigated. The proposed ink compositions for
exographic printing on paper substrates are based on an environmentally friendly acrylic binder and
contain inorganic llers with platelet particles incorporated in the polymer matrix. Coatings based on
the developed printing inks demonstrate signicantly decreased water vapour permeability compared
to traditional polymer inks. The effect of decreased permeability was investigated considering inks rheological behaviour, the coating structure, mechanical properties, surface energy and water uptake for
different ink formulations. The developed inks provide variable optical properties including coatings
with a relatively high transparency. The development of the functional barrier inks contributes to saving
natural resources by prolonging life performance of packaging materials and goods.
2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The concept of improving the quality of paper packaging materials by enhancing their barrier performance is of high interest in
research, technology and application [15]. Enhancement of the
barrier properties of paper and board packaging materials is relevant for prolonging the life cycle of the materials and packed goods
thus bringing economic impact and contributing to saving natural resources. In addition to their barrier performance, packaging
materials are expected to be environmentally friendly, resistant to
mechanical impact, to be of a relatively low cost [1,2], and in several
cases to provide desired optical characteristics.
Examples of packaging materials with improved barrier performance include materials based on polymer lms, aluminium foils
and multi-layered polymer composite materials. Filled and unlled
polymer materials for packaging are usually based on polyvinyl
chloride, polystyrene, polypropylene, polyacrylonitrile and others
[3]. Inorganic llers with a platelet particle shape can be introduced in polymer materials for providing barrier effect against
water vapour and gases. The barrier effect is given by increasing
the tortuous path for water vapour and gas during their penetration
through the material [6]. Fillers with high aspect ratio and with a
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: irina.zvonkina@gmail.com (I.J. Zvonkina).
0300-9440/$ see front matter 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2013.12.001
relatively high specic surface area contribute to an enhanced reinforcement effect [7]. Most commonly used inorganic llers with
platelet particles are layered clays, such as montmorillonite nanoclays and silicates in general, known for their barrier performance,
low cost and easy processability [3,7,8].
Paper and board materials have been widely used in packaging.
Traditionally used paper and board have, however, a disadvantage
of a relatively poor resistance to moisture and gases [9]. Application of polymer coatings with enhanced barrier performance
is one of the possibilities to improve the quality of paper packaging materials. Application of polymer materials for coatings by
printing has benets in technological and economic aspects. The
existing materials for printing providing the barrier effect against
moisture are based mainly on polymer compositions containing
waxes or other organic components for decreasing coating water
vapour permeability [10,11]. However, application of wax in a polymer composition in an amount sufcient for providing the barrier
effect of the coatings can be disadvantageous due to a possibility
for decreasing printability and the quality of the printed coatings.
This can be due to the drawbacks in the ink transfer and adhesion
leading to ink refusal, print mottle and smearing of water-borne
inks containing wax [12]. Decreasing permeability of water vapour
and gases through materials with polymer coatings still remains a
challenge.
Development of new polymer ink compositions for packaging
with enhanced barrier performance and other improved characteristics of the printed coatings, such as desired mechanical strength
647
W x
t A p
(1)
mt m0
m0
(2)
648
Table 1
Surface energy at 20 C of the liquids used for the surface energy analysis.
Water
Diiodomethane
Thiodiglycol
Ethylene glycol
Total surface
energy (mN/m)
Dispersive
component (mN/m)
Polar component
(mN/m)
72.1
50.0
54.0
48.0
19.9
47.4
39.2
29.0
52.2
2.6
14.8
19.0
Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) of free lms was performed using a Netzsch-DMA 242C device at the temperature range
from 60 C to 145 C at the heating rate of 2 K/min with preliminary cooling of the lms to 60 C at the cooling rate of 2 K/min.
Wetting of paper substrates by the inks was analysed by deposition of at least 5 drops of a similar size of each composition on the
surface of the selected paper substrates. Contact angle of the ink
drops on paper was determined afterwards using the device applied
for surface energy evaluation (see above). The tests were performed
at the standard conditions with equal time intervals after deposition. The compositions were diluted as required for printing process
to achieve similar viscosity for each type of the formulation prior to
the wetting tests. The drops were assumed to be symmetrical with
regard to the vertical axe.
Water vapour permeability of the substrates coated by exographic printing was determined gravimetrically after specied
time intervals of water evaporation through the coated substrates.
The tests were performed at the standard conditions according to
the modied method ASTM E96 as described in the study of Arabuli
et al. [21]. The partial water vapour pressure difference (p) at both
sides of the coated substrates was calculated as follows according
to [22]:
p = p
RH
100
RH2
100
(3)
Fig. 1. Light transmittance of polymer coatings lled with glass and talc platelets
with the ller content of 1719 vol.% (a) and 26 vol.% (b) applied on glass substrates.
649
Table 2
Water vapour permeability and relative standard error for free lms based on the
developed ink compositions.
Composition
WVPC
(g/m 24 h Pa)
WVPC, barrer
Relative standard
error (%)
Polymer binder
Aluminium, 9 vol.%
Aluminium, 19 vol.%
Aluminium, 26 vol.%
Talc, 8 vol.%
Talc, 17 vol.%
Talc, 26 vol.%
Glass, 10 vol.%
Glass, 19 vol.%
Glass, 26 vol.%
20.2 106
5.75 106
2.34 106
1.57 106
15 106
12.4 106
6.25 106
8.62 106
4.73 106
4.51 106
23.3
6.62
2.70
1.81
17.3
14.3
7.2
9.93
5.45
5.20
1.85
2.35
1.00
0.9
4.26
0.57
0.27
2.96
4.16
2.66
Fig. 2. Viscosity curves with increasing and decreasing shear rate for the developed
ink compositions and unlled polymer dispersion.
650
Fig. 3. Light microscopy images of polymer coatings lled with aluminium akes at 9 vol.% (a) and 26 vol.% (b) serving as a model for printed coatings.
Fig. 4. Light microscopy images of polymer coatings lled with glass particles at 10 vol.% (a), 19 vol.% (b) and 26 vol.% (c) serving as a model for printed coatings.
Fig. 5. Polarised light microscopy images of polymer coatings lled with talc at 8 vol.% (a), 17 vol.% (b) and 26 vol.% (c) serving as a model for printed coatings.
651
Fig. 6. SEM images of polymer coatings lled with aluminium akes at 6 vol.%, different magnication (a and b), 12 vol.% (c) and interface between aluminium and polymer
(d).
Fig. 7. Water vapour permeability of unlled and lled polymer free lms serving as a model for printed coatings.
652
Fig. 8. Relative permeability of free lms prepared from the developed lled polymer inks.
Table 3
Free surface energy and water contact angle of coatings applied form the developed
ink compositions.
Composition
Surface energy
(mN/m)
Water contact
angle ( )
Polymer binder
Aluminium, 9 vol.%
Aluminium, 19 vol.%
Aluminium, 26 vol.%
Talc, 8 vol.%
Talc, 17 vol.%
Talc, 26 vol.%
Glass, 10 vol.%
Glass, 19 vol.%
Glass, 26 vol.%
20.85
20.58
21.87
20.59
20.46
20.81
20.71
20.99
21.15
21.01
90.6
91.2
91.4
92.5
91.5
90.6
93
91.3
91.4
93
above (see Section 2). The water uptake results for non-lled polymer lms and for samples with an intermediate ller content of
each type of the lled polymer compositions as a function of the
total immersion time in distilled water are shown in Fig. 11.
The water absorption capability of free lms changes with time
of their immersion in water. An average tendency for water uptake
is shown in Fig. 11. The results demonstrate two stages of water
uptake. At the beginning, the amount of absorbed water increases
abruptly with increasing ller content. At this stage occupation of
pores in the lm by water molecules is supposed to take place that
is driven mainly by micro-capillary forces and by the afnity of
hydrophilic components of the lms to water (Fig. 11). After a sharp
increase, water uptake values come to a plateau corresponding to
the second stage with a slower increase of the amount of absorbed
water. Unlled polymer lms have the highest water uptake; the
compositions lled with aluminium akes have the lowest water
uptake values. The lms based on talc and glass lled compositions are located in between in a decreasing of water uptake order
(Fig. 11).
The process of water uptake by lled and non-lled polymer
lms is supposed to be related to polymer swelling [28]. This can
decrease the lm porosity at the interfaces of the polymer and llers
or in the polymer. The increased due to this pressure at the interface
can lead to expelling of water molecules from the lled polymer
lms. Therefore, water uptake increases sharply at the beginning
of immersion in water and after a certain time interval it can slightly
decrease (Fig. 11). The speed of water uptake is not uniform during
the time of immersion of the lms in water as well, as it follows
from Fig. 11.
653
Fig. 9. DMA plots of free lms based on lled and unlled polymer printing ink compositions containing aluminium (a), glass (b) and talc (c) platelets with different ller
content.
654
Fig. 10. Polarity of the surface of coatings based on different ink compositions.
Table 4
Wetting contact angle of the polymer binder and of the developed ink compositions.
Composition
Wetting contact
angle ( )
Relative standard
error (%)
Polymer binder
Aluminium, 19 vol.%
Talc, 26 vol.%
Glass, 26 vol.%
86
79.1
64.9
59.4
1.3
3.3
5.4
4.2
selected paper substrates (see Table 4). Improving wetting is essential to enhance adhesion of the printed coatings to paper and to
avoid or to decrease pinhole formation during exographic printing. This is especially relevant for improving barrier performance
of the printed coatings.
Fig. 11. Water uptake ratio for unlled and lled polymer lms.
655
Fig. 12. Water vapour permeability of uncoated paper substrates and developed ink compositions containing aluminium, talc and glass llers.
4. Conclusions
New exographic inks were developed based on acrylic polymer dispersion with incorporation of inorganic llers consisting of
platelet particles. The different types of llers introduced in the
polymer matrix provide an enhanced barrier effect to the printed
coatings and contribute to different mechanical, optical and other
properties of the coatings. The design of the developed materials
provides a layered structure of the coatings with a relatively good
distribution of particles in the polymer matrix.
Water vapour permeability of free lms serving as a model of
coatings decreased signicantly with incorporation of llers and
with increasing their content in the polymer matrix. An increased
barrier effect of the coatings is associated with an enhanced
mechanical strength, a slightly decreased polarity of the coating
surface at certain ller content and with other physicalmechanical
properties of the coatings applied from the developed inks.
The developed inks were applied on the selected paper substrates by laboratory exographic printing. Incorporation of llers
in the polymer binder at certain content led to a slightly improved
wetting of the paper substrates that is of relevance in a printing
process. The substrates covered by printed coatings demonstrated
a decreased permeability of water vapour at standard conditions.
The proposed new environmentally friendly inks contribute to
the development of packaging materials with improved barrier
performance, achieved by application of the developed printed
coatings with decreased water vapour permeability.
References
[1] R. Coles, D. McDowell, M.J. Kirwan, Food Packaging Technology, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., London, 2000.
[2] K. Majeed, M. Jawaid, A. Hassan, A. Abu Bakar, H.P.S. Abdul Khalil, A.A. Salema,
I. Inuwa, Potential materials for food packaging from nanoclay/natural bres
lled hybrid composites, Mater. Des. 46 (2013) 391410.
[3] A. Sorrentino, Nanoclays and ultrathin lms for packaging applications, in: A.S.H. Makhlouf, A. Tiginyanu (Eds.), Nanocoatings and Ultrathin Films. Technologies and Applications, Woodhead Publishing Ltd.,
Oxford/Cambridge/Philadelphia/New Delhi, 2011, pp. 203234.
[4] J.-W. Rhim, H.-M. Park, C.-S. Ha, Bio-nanocomposites for Food packaging applications, Prog. Polym. Sci. 38 (1011) (2013) 16291652.
[5] N. Peelman, P. Ragaert, B. De Meulenaer, D. Adons, R. Peeters, L. Cardon, F. Van
Impe, F. Devlieghere, Application of bioplastics for food packaging, Trends Food
Sci. Technol. 32 (2013) 128141.
[6] C. Silvestre, D. Duraccio, S. Cimmino, Food packaging based on polymer nanomaterials, Prog. Polym. Sci. 36 (2011) 17661782.
[7] H. Azeredo, Nanocomposites for food packaging applications, Food Res. Int. 42
(2009) 12401253.
[8] M. Xanthos, Functional Fillers for Plastics, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co KGaA,
Weinheim, 2005.
[9] H. Holik, Handbook on Paper and Board, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co KGaA,
Weinheim, 2006.
[10] M. Vh-Nissi, Ph.D. Thesis, Tampere University of Technology, Paper Converting Institute, Tampere, Finland, 1998.
[11] T. Schuman, M. Wikstroem, M. Rigdahl, Dispersion coating with carboxylated
and cross-linked styrene-butadiene lattice. 2. Effects of substrate and polymer characteristics on the properties of coated paperboard, Prog. Org. Coat. 51
(2004) 228237.
[12] T. Schuman, B. Adolffson, M. Wikstroem, M. Rigdahl, Surface treatment and
printing properties of dispersion-coated paperboard, Prog. Org. Coat. 54 (2005)
188197.
[13] DIN EN ISO 787-5, Allgemaine Pruefverfahren fuer Pigmente und Fuellstoffe.
Teil 5: Bestimmung der Oeilsatz, 1980.
[14] J. Bieleman, Additives for Coatings, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, Weinheim, 2000.
[15] S. Pavildou, C.D. Papaspyrides, A review on polymer-layered silicate nanocomposites, Prog. Polym. Sci. 33 (2008) 11191198.
656
[16] H.J. Busscher, et al., The effect of surface roughening of polymers on measured
contact angles of liquids, Colloids Surf. 9 (1984) 319331.
[17] J.-R. Chen, T. Wakida, Studies on surface free energy and surface structure of
PTFE rm treated with low temperature plasma, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 63 (1997)
17331739.
[18] H. Yildirim Erbil, Surface tension of polymer, in: K.S. Birdi (Ed.), CRC Handbook
of Surface and Colloid Chemistry, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1997, p. 292 (Chapter
9).
[19] D.K. Owens, R.C. Wendt, Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers, J.
Appl. Polym. Sci. 13 (1969) 17411747.
[20] G. Meichsner, G.T. Mezger, J. Schroeder, Lackeigenscahften messen und steuern,
Vincent Network, Hannover, 2003.
[21] S. Arabuli, V. Vlasenko, A. Havelka, Z. Kus, Analysis of modern methods for
measuring vapour permeability of textiles, in: 7th International conference
TEXSCI 2010, 2010.
[22] http://www.conservationphysics.org/atmcalc/atmoclc2.pdf
(accessed
20.03.13).
[23] Sun Chemical Corporation, An Introductory Guide to Rheology, vol. VII, Sun
Chemical Corporation, 1995.
[24] V. Mittal, Barrier properties of composite materials, in: V. Mittal (Ed.), Barrier
Properties of Polymer Clay Nanocomposites, Nova Science Publishers Inc., New
York, 2009, pp. 117.
[25] IMERYS, Pigments for Paper. IMERYS Technical Guide: New Concepts for Barrier
Coatings, 2008 (accessed 04.2012).
[26] K.P. Menard, Dynamic Mechanical Analysis. A Practical Introduction, Taylor &
Francis Group LLC, Boca Raton/London/New York, 2008.
[27] M. Vh-Nissi, A. Savolainen, Filled Barrier Dispersion Coatings, in: Tappi
Coatng Confrence Proceedings, Toronto, Canada, 1999.
[28] X.J. Fan, S.W.R. Lee, Q. Han, Experimental investigations and model study of
moisture behaviours in polymeric materials, Microelectron. Reliab. 49 (2009)
861871.
[29] E.R. Todd, Printing Inks. Formulation Principles, Manufacture and Quality Control Testing Procedures, Pira International, United Kingdom,
1994.