Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
EXHIBITB000001
Outline
EXHIBITB000002
EXHIBITB000003
Todays Purpose
EXHIBITB000004
QUESTION:
How effective are existing treatments for PTSD ?
(i.e., are there alternative conventional treatments available ?)
EXHIBITB000005
Intrusion (re-experiencing)
Avoidance
EXHIBITB000006
EXHIBITB000007
The committee was also struck by the scant evidence exploring some of the
possibly unique aspects of PTSD in veterans. For the most part we cannot say
whether the treatment of PTSD in veterans should be the same as in civilians
Lack of assessor blinding or independence, small sample size, lack of f/u for dropouts
High dropout rates & weak handling of missing data
the evidence fails to address the effects of high rates of comorbidity among
veterans with PTSD, especially major depression, traumatic brain injury, and
substance abuse.
EXHIBITB000008
Authors searched for RCTs of any treatment for PTSD in adults published
between January 1980 and April 1, 2012 in English
EXHIBITB000009
For both Rx types, studies w/ more women & fewer vets had larger effects
EXHIBITB000010
VA Mental Health Services launched a national initiative w/ competencybased training to disseminate PE throughout VA in 2007:
Largest PE training program in the nation (> 1500 providers trained by 3/1/2012)
Data collected from 804 clinician trainees & 1931 patients w/ PTSD
EXHIBITB000011
EXHIBITB000012
there have been relatively few studies to directly examine the impact
of a given intervention on sleep problems in PTSD, and even fewer that
have used validated measures of sleep. Thus, currently our arsenal is
quite limited when it comes to managing sleep disturbances in PTSD.
EXHIBITB000013
EXHIBITB000014
Raskind MA, et al. A trial of prazosin for combat trauma PTSD with
nightmares in active-duty soldiers returned from Iraq and Afghanistan.
Am J Psychiatry 2013;170:1003-1010
RCT x 15 weeks in 67 (young) active duty soldiers w/ recalled distressing combatrelated nightmares
EXHIBITB000015
ANSWER:
(to: How effective are existing treatments for PTSD ?)
EXHIBITB000016
EXHIBITB000017
EXHIBITB000018
Assessment:
Clinical trial* and Obs study* included in Depts review of evidence (next)
Otherwise, non-contributory to adequately demonstrating clinical efficacy in
humans for PTSD
EXHIBITB000019
association between PTSD and receipt of opioids, hi-risk use, adverse outcomes
QUALITY of Evidence
Based on GRADE methodology & definitions:
EXHIBITB000021
EXHIBITB000022
LIMITATIONS
Small size
Males only
Nabilone (synthetic THC analogue) started @ 0.5 mg (range 0.2 4.0 mg)
EXHIBITB000024
LIMITATIONS
No placebo control
Primary focus on nightmares only
Use of THC analogue rather than cannabis
No standardized or validated outcome measures
No reporting of results by gender or type of trauma
LOW Quality Evidence
EXHIBITB000025
THC in olive oil sublingually - started @ 2.5 mg bid; titrated to 5.0 mg bid
Outcomes assessed by:
EXHIBITB000026
LIMITATIONS
No placebo control
Short duration
EXHIBITB000027
EXHIBITB000028
LIMITATIONS
No placebo control
Retrospective/observational design
EXHIBITB000029
EXHIBITB000030
LIMITATIONS
No placebo control
Retrospective/observational design
only patients who reported benefit from cannabis in reducing their PTSD
were studied
Recall bias
EXHIBITB000031
EXHIBITB000032
DISCUSSION
* PHOTO *
EXHIBITB000033